Capsule for gastrointestinal sampling

Abstract

To provide a passive sampling digestive device capable of sealing a capsule when collected from a desired part of a digestive tract.SOLUTION: A device includes a capsule housing 202 containing an absorbent sampling hydrogel 214. The capsule may be ingested by a patient and subsequently travel through the gastrointestinal tract. Once the capsule reaches a desired location in the gastrointestinal tract, gastrointestinal fluid may flow into the capsule through a sampling aperture 208 of the capsule. The fluid may be absorbed by and stored within the sampling hydrogel for subsequent analysis, and the absorption of the fluid may cause the sampling hydrogel to expand within the capsule. The capsule may further include a sealing member 216 positioned between the sampling hydrogel and the sampling aperture, and the expansion of the sampling hydrogel may press the sealing member against the sampling aperture to seal the capsule.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2A

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The disclosed embodiments relate to a capsule for non-invasive gastrointestinal sampling. [Background technology]

[0002] Many studies have found that the gut microbiota plays a key role in the pathophysiology governing human health. Many of these studies have identified the impact of the gut microbiota on human metabolism, nutritional intake, the efficacy of orally administered therapeutics, and the functioning of the immune and nervous systems. For example, many studies have found a correlation between an imbalance of the microbiota (dysbiosis) and various diseases such as diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome, diseases that affect approximately 30 million people in the United States. Similarly, recent insights into the possible ways in which gut bacteria may affect the development and maintenance of the nervous system suggest a link between the composition of the gut microbiota and neuropsychiatric disorders such as anxiety, depression, and the regulation of dysbiosis. Summary of the Invention

[0003] In one embodiment, a device for passive sampling of the gastrointestinal tract includes a capsule housing that bounds a cavity, a sampling opening formed in the capsule housing and providing fluid communication between the cavity and an exterior of the capsule housing, and a sampling hydrogel located within the cavity. Upon exposure to a sample fluid, the sampling hydrogel is configured to absorb the sample fluid and expand within the cavity to store the sample fluid for subsequent analysis. The device further includes a sealing member located within the cavity between the sampling hydrogel and the sampling opening. Expansion of the sampling hydrogel within the cavity pressurizes the sealing member into engagement with the sampling opening to seal the cavity.

[0004] In another embodiment, a method for passive sampling of a patient's gastrointestinal tract includes administering to the patient an ingestible device. The ingestible device includes a capsule housing defining a cavity, a sampling opening formed in the capsule housing and providing fluid communication between the cavity and an exterior of the capsule housing, a sampling hydrogel located in the cavity, and a sealing member located in the cavity between the sampling hydrogel and the sampling opening. The method also includes exposing the sampling hydrogel to a sample fluid in the patient's gastrointestinal tract, absorbing the sample fluid into the sampling hydrogel, expanding the sampling hydrogel in the cavity via absorption of the sample fluid, and sealing the cavity by pressurizing the sealing member to engage the sampling opening via expansion of the sampling hydrogel. The method further includes retrieving the device after the device has passed through the patient's gastrointestinal tract, and retrieving the sample fluid from the sampling hydrogel after retrieving the device.

[0005] In another embodiment, a device for passive sampling of the gastrointestinal tract includes a capsule housing that bounds a cavity, and a sampling opening formed within the capsule housing that provides fluid communication between the cavity and an exterior of the capsule housing. A solution-cast enteric coating covers the sampling opening, and degradation of the enteric coating exposes the sampling opening to allow flow into the cavity.

[0006] In another embodiment, a method of manufacturing a device for passive sampling of the gastrointestinal tract includes providing a capsule housing having a cavity and a sampling opening, the sampling opening providing fluid communication between the cavity and an exterior of the capsule housing, the method further includes forming an enteric coating over the sampling opening using a solution casting technique to cover the sampling opening.

[0007] It should be appreciated that the foregoing concepts and additional concepts discussed below may be arranged in any suitable combination, as the disclosure is not limited in this respect. Moreover, other advantages and novel features of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following detailed description of various non-limiting embodiments when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0008] The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component illustrated in various figures may be represented by a similar numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be numbered in every drawing. In the drawings,

[0009] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a capsule moving through the digestive tract, according to some embodiments. [Figure 1A] 2 is an enlarged view of FIG. 1 showing the capsule in a first position in the digestive tract. [Figure 1B] 2 is another enlarged view of FIG. 1 showing the capsule in a second position in the digestive tract. [Figure 2A] FIG. 2 is an exploded view of a capsule according to some embodiments. [Figure 2B] FIG. 2 is an exploded view of a capsule according to some embodiments. [Diagram 3] 1 is a photograph of components of a capsule according to one embodiment. [Figure 4] Photograph of the components of Figure 3 assembled into a capsule. [Diagram 5] 1 shows photographs of a hydrogel swelling experiment, according to one embodiment. [Figure 6] 1 is a plot showing swelling ratio over time for hydrogels made with different AA / AM ratios, according to one example. [Figure 7] 1 shows a photograph of a hydrogel swelling force experiment, according to one embodiment. [Figure 8]1 is a plot showing the force profile generated during swelling of a hydrogel, according to one embodiment. [Figure 9] 1 shows a photograph of a contact angle experiment, according to one embodiment. [Figure 10] 1 is a plot showing contact angle over time for different surface treatments, according to one embodiment. [Figure 11] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a leak test, according to one embodiment. [Figure 12] 12 is a plot showing the change in conductivity over time in the leakage test of FIG. 11. [Figure 13] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an experimental setup for leak testing, according to another embodiment. [Figure 14] 14 is a plot of UV spectroscopy measurements from the leak test of FIG. 13. [Figure 15A] 1 is an SEM image of a hydrogel after exposure to deionized water, according to one embodiment. [Figure 15B] FIG. 15B is a SEM image showing a magnified view of the SEM image of FIG. 15A. [Figure 15C] 1 is an SEM image of a hydrogel after exposure to a TSB / PBS solution, according to one embodiment. [Figure 15D] 1 is a SEM image showing an enlarged view of the above SEM image. [Figure 16] 1 shows photographs of TSB / agar plates with CFU counts of hydrogels and sealed capsules exposed to different solutions, according to one example. [Figure 17] 17 is a bar graph showing the CFU / ml counts of the hydrogels of FIG. 16. [Figure 18] [Figure 18A] Plot showing dye release of different enteric coating polymers in a buffer of pH 1.2. [Figure 18B] Plot showing dye release of enteric coating polymers in a buffer of pH 3.0. [Figure 18C] Plot showing dye release of enteric coating polymers in a buffer of pH 6.8. [Figure 19A] Photographs of dry hydrogels and hydrogels swollen for 4 hours. [Figure 19B]1 is a plot showing the swelling ratio over time of hydrogels in pH 6.8 and 7.4 buffers. [Figure 19C] 1 is a plot showing the elongation of a hydrogel over time. [Figure 19D] 1 is a plot showing the compressive force profile of a hydrogel when it contacts a PDMS membrane. [Figure 20A] FIG. 1 is a photograph showing two microcentrifuges filled with green fluorescent protein (GFP) and deionized water (DI) and the corresponding hydrogels exposed to the solutions for 2 hours. [Figure 20B] 1 is an image showing a close-up of a control sample exposed to deionized water. [Figure 20C] FIG. 13 is an image showing a magnified view of a sample exposed to GFP. [Figure 20D] 1 is a plot showing the extraction profile of GFP over time. [Figure 21A] 1 is a plot showing UV-Vis absorbance of test environment concentrations diluted 1:10 with an absorbance peak at 562 nm. [Figure 21B] 1 is a plot showing a calibration curve for bovine serum albumin (BSA). [Figure 21C] 1 is a plot showing the concentration of extracted BSA after 2 hours compared to the test environment concentration. [Figure 21D] 1 is a plot showing a standard curve for calprotectin. [Figure 21E] 1 is a plot showing the extractable concentration of calprotectin after 2 hours compared to the test environment concentration. [Figure 22-1] [Figure 22A] Photograph of four flasks containing various pH buffers using different colored dyes to simulate pH changes along the digestive tract: from left to right, saliva pH 7, stomach pH 3, small intestine pH 6.8, and colon pH 7.4 (deionized water). [Figure 22B] Photograph of a capsule removed and opened after 2 hours in the stomach (pH 3 buffer). [Figure 22C] Photograph of a capsule removed and opened after 2 hours in the small intestine (pH 6.8 buffer). [Figure 22-2][Figure 22D] Plot of UV-Vis absorbance of pH 3 medium before and after holding capsules. [Figure 22E] Plot of UV-Vis absorbance of pH 6.8 medium before and after holding capsules. [Figure 22F] Plot of UV-Vis absorbance of deionized water medium before and after holding capsules. [Figure 23A] 1 is a bar graph showing the concentration of BSA extracted in vitro. [Figure 23B] FIG. 1 is a bar graph showing the concentration of extracted calprotectin in vitro. [Figure 24A] FIG. 1 is a photograph of a section of small intestine filled with intestinal fluid loaded with calprotectin with two sampling capsules inside. [Figure 24B] Photographs showing recovery of capsules from the intestine. [Figure 24C] Photographs of disintegrated capsules extracted with collected intestinal fluid in Tris buffer for 2 hours. [Figure 24D] A bar graph showing the extractable concentrations of two test environmental concentrations, one with a low concentration of calprotectin and one with a high concentration of calprotectin. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0010] Sampling of the human microbiota is becoming an essential aspect in understanding the mechanisms of microbiota-drug interactions, as well as the extent to which this complex interaction may affect drug efficacy and bioavailability. Much of what is known about the structure and function of the human gut microbiota has been ascertained from ex situ culture and / or sequencing of bacteria from fecal samples. However, because only a small fraction of gut bacteria is available and culturable from fecal samples, efforts have been made to develop tools that would allow for direct sampling of microbes from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. For example, colonoscopy and / or gastroscopy methods are currently used, but these methods are limited to sampling at specific sections throughout the GI tract, invasive approaches that can cause patient discomfort and lead to reduced compliance. Other approaches have used smart functional capsules with the ability to collect samples at various target locations within the GI tract, but these methods may address some of the limitations associated with traditional colonoscopy and gastroscopy. Furthermore, capsule-based devices may improve patient comfort without the need to be administered in a clinical setting. For example, PillCam™ capsule endoscopy (CE) technology is used to collect images from hard-to-reach areas throughout the digestive tract to diagnose diseases associated with the small intestine such as obscure digestive bleeding, tumors, Crohn's disease, angiodysplasia, celiac disease, and polyposis, however, this technology does not have the ability to collect and store samples as they pass through the digestive tract.

[0011] Efforts to develop new capsules with different methods for sampling the gut microbiota can be divided into two main categories: active and passive devices. In active devices, the actuation and sampling mechanism is often achieved by using an on-board battery that provides the energy required to operate the various plungers, pistons, biopsy forceps, etc. that collect and store the sample within the capsule. However, in such devices, the battery often occupies a large portion of the capsule's volume, which can limit the space in which the sample can be stored, and active devices usually have a high risk of failure and possible leakage of corrosive electrolytes that can cause severe corrosive injury and liquefaction necrosis. To circumvent these and other drawbacks associated with active devices, various passive actuation sampling mechanism approaches have been utilized, which allow the capsule to be more compact, economically viable, and with fewer safety-related issues. In such designs, the capsule moves through the digestive tract via peristaltic motion at an average speed of 1-2 cm / min, and the sample is collected by simple passive actuation such as capillary action or pressure differential forces. However, the inventors have recognized and appreciated that there are many important design considerations that have not yet been addressed by existing passive devices. For example, some existing approaches rely on capsule assemblies that require a well-sealed vacuum chamber within the capsule, which significantly increases the complexity of the device. Other approaches have relied on retrieval of the sampling device via a string that extends upstream of the digestive tract, which can cause discomfort to the patient. Furthermore, most existing passive sampling devices lack the ability to seal and protect the collected sample after sampling at the target location is complete, making such devices incapable of providing localized samples from specific portions of the digestive tract.

[0012] In view of the above, the inventors have recognized and appreciated many advantages associated with passive sampling gastrointestinal devices that provide a simple construction and allow for sealing of the capsule once a sample is collected from a desired portion of the gastrointestinal tract. For example, in some embodiments, a passive sampling device may include a capsule that may be ingested by a patient as the capsule travels through the gastrointestinal tract. The capsule may include a capsule housing that defines a cavity and an absorbent sampling hydrogel located within the cavity. The capsule housing may include a sampling opening that allows fluid from the gastrointestinal tract (e.g., fluid containing microorganisms or proteins such as calprotectin) to flow into the cavity where it is absorbed by the sampling hydrogel. Upon absorbing the fluid, the sampling hydrogel may expand within the cavity and pressurize a sealing member (e.g., a sealing membrane) located in the cavity between the opening and the hydrogel material to engage the opening and seal the opening, thereby restricting subsequent fluid from entering or exiting the capsule. In this manner, the devices disclosed herein may utilize the sampling hydrogel as a medium for storing the microbial sample within the capsule and as a means for providing passive mechanical actuation to seal the capsule once sampling is complete. Additionally, the inventors have appreciated that after the capsule is sealed, the hydrated sampling hydrogel within the capsule may provide an ideal living environment with nutrients for the sampled bacteria to survive prior to retrieving the capsule. Additionally, according to some embodiments, the sealing of the capsule serves to protect the sample collected within the capsule from the harsh environment located within the digestive tract, thereby preserving the bacterial sample stored in the sampling hydrogel sample for subsequent analysis.

[0013] In some embodiments, the capsule may include a biodegradable coating on at least a portion of the capsule housing. For example, the biodegradable coating may be an enteric coating that is configured to dissolve at a desired target location along the length of the digestive tract. In one embodiment, the biodegradable coating is provided on a portion of the capsule housing where an opening is formed. Thus, the biodegradable coating may seal the opening until the capsule reaches the target location and then degrade to allow intestinal fluids to enter the capsule cavity through the opening. It should be understood that the capsule according to the present disclosure may include any suitable biodegradable enteric coating, as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, suitable coating materials include, but are not limited to, pH-sensitive polymeric materials such as polymethacrylic acid-co-ethyl acrylate (EDURAGIT L100-55), polymethacrylic acid-co-methyl methacrylate (EUDRAGIT L100), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate (HP-55), hypromellose phthalate (HPMCP), cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP), and polyvinyl acetate phthalate (PVAP).

[0014] In some embodiments, the enteric coating is formed using a solution casting technique. In such techniques, a polymer is dissolved in a solution and the solution is coated into the sampling opening of the cap. In some embodiments, the cap of the sampling capsule is placed on a silicone (e.g., PDMS) holder that blocks the opening of the cap while the enteric coating is deposited on the cap, preventing the enteric coating from passing through the opening. The solution may have a high viscosity and may also dry quickly. After the coating has dried, the cap may be lifted off the holder. The solution may be easily separated from the silicon holder, allowing the coating to remain on the cap and cover the opening of the cap. In some embodiments, the coating may be formed by drop casting, which involves releasing large droplets with controlled size and momentum that spread upon impact and wet the surface. In some embodiments, a doctor blade may be used to create a film of uniform thickness. Doctor blading, also known as knife coating or blade coating, involves moving a blade over a surface (or moving a surface under the blade). A small gap between the blade and the substrate determines how much solution may pass as the blade passes, spreading the solution evenly across the substrate. In both the drop casting and doctor blade processes, an enteric coating covers the sampling opening in the capsule cap and provides targeted dissolution throughout the gastrointestinal tract to allow for targeted activation and sampling.

[0015] As described above, the capsule may include a sealing member that may be pressurized by the sampling hydrogel to engage the sampling opening of the capsule after the sampling hydrogel absorbs the intestinal fluid sample and expands within the capsule cavity. According to some aspects, the sealing member may be configured to provide a desired gas permeability between the capsule cavity and the external environment. For example, in some embodiments, the sealing member may be formed as a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane, which may provide a gas permeability that allows natural gas exchange between the digestive tract and the interior (i.e., cavity) of the capsule, which may help maintain the natural metabolism of the sampled bacteria and promote their survival after the capsule is sealed. Other materials suitable for the sealing member include, but are not limited to, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), silyl olefin copolymer (COC), and perfluoropolyether (PFPE).

[0016] Depending on the particular embodiment, the capsules described herein may be capable of maintaining viable bacteria viable for extended periods of time for subsequent analysis after the capsule is sealed via the sealing member. For example, in some embodiments, the sampling hydrogel and / or sealing member may be constructed and arranged to maintain viable bacteria (i.e., keep viable bacteria alive) in the sample fluid for at least 1 hour, at least 5 hours, 10 hours, at least 20 hours, or at least 24 hours or more before the sampling fluid is collected for analysis.

[0017] In some embodiments, the device can be used to collect proteins or other biomarkers to investigate conditions in the body. For example, in some embodiments, the device can be used to collect calprotectin in the digestive tract to diagnose inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Calprotectin is a protein released by neutrophils when there is inflammation in the digestive tract.

[0018] After passing through the digestive tract, the sealed capsule may be excreted by the patient and then retrieved for analysis of the gut microbiota sample contained therein. According to some aspects, the capsule may be constructed and arranged to allow easy disassembly after retrieval, thereby allowing easy retrieval of the sampling hydrogel containing the sample. For example, in some embodiments, the capsule housing may be formed from two or more housing parts that may be removably fastened to each other to allow access to the capsule cavity. In one exemplary embodiment, the capsule housing may be formed from two capsule parts that attach to each other via a threaded interface, which may allow the capsule to be easily disassembled after retrieval by excretion so that the sampling hydrogel within the capsule may be removed for future culturing and analysis of the bacterial sample contained therein. Other suitable interfaces include, but are not limited to, snap-fit ​​interfaces, and friction or interference fit interfaces.

[0019] According to some aspects, prior to assembling the various components of the capsule housing, the components may be treated to provide a hydrophilic coating on the capsule housing. The inventors have recognized and appreciated that such treatment may help to facilitate the flow of sample fluid through the sampling opening and into the interior of the cavity where the sampling fluid may be absorbed by the hydrogel material contained therein. In particular, the hydrophilic coating on the surface of the capsule housing may help provide a continuous draw of fluid from the intestine into the narrow sampling opening of the capsule. For example, in some embodiments, the hydrophilic surface modification may be performed by activating the surfaces of the housing components with air plasma treatment followed by polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment, as described in more detail below.

[0020] The hydrogel materials disclosed herein may be composed of hydrophilic polymer networks that can absorb large amounts of water while maintaining their structure. These polymer networks are typically crosslinked via covalent bonds, hydrogen bonds, van der Waals interactions, and / or physical entanglements. The devices disclosed herein utilize both the absorption capacity as well as the mechanical properties of hydrogels to provide a non-invasive sampling device that can passively extract and secure samples from target locations along the digestive tract.

[0021] In some embodiments, the sampling hydrogel in the capsule may be synthesized from a combination of acrylic acid (AA) and acrylamide (AM) monomers. It should be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to a particular ratio of these monomers to form a hydrogel material. For example, suitable ratios of these monomers may include, but are not limited to, 10% AA / 90% AM, 30% AA / 70% AM, 50% AA / 50% AM, 70% AA / 30% AM, or 90% AA / 10% AM. As described in more detail below, the hydrogel material may be formed by mixing these monomers with deionized (DI) water, as well as methylene bis-acrylamide (MBA) as a crosslinker and ammonium persulfate (AP) as an initiator. Although certain hydrogel materials are described herein, it should be understood that other hydrogel materials may be suitable, such as hydrogels based on other acrylic polymers (e.g., acrylic acid, acrylamide, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), and / or N,N-diethylacrylamide) and / or combinations of non-acrylic polymers. In some embodiments, the hydrogel may be synthesized from a combination of acrylamide and N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA).

[0022] It should be appreciated that the capsule housing according to the present disclosure may be made from any suitable biocompatible material. For example, in some embodiments, the capsule housing may be formed from a biocompatible polymeric material, such as a methacrylate polymer. Other suitable materials include, but are not limited to, commercially available biocompatible polymers, such as Dental LT Clear, MED625FLX, and MED610, and / or other polymeric materials treated with PEG to provide biocompatibility. Furthermore, it should be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to a particular method for forming the capsule housing. For example, some embodiments described in more detail below utilize a capsule housing formed by a 3D printing process. Other suitable manufacturing methods may include, but are not limited to, casting methods, molding methods (e.g., injection molding), or other methods that would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.

[0023] Depending on the particular embodiment, the capsule may have any suitable dimensions. For example, a cylindrical capsule may have a length of about 9 mm to about 23 mm, and a diameter of about 4.5 mm to about 10 mm. For example, in one embodiment, the capsule may have a diameter of about 9 mm and a length of about 15 mm, which is smaller than a standard 000 size gelatin capsule (having dimensions of 9.97 x 26.14 mm). Additionally, the sampling opening formed in the capsule housing may have a diameter selected based on the size of the sealing member contained within the capsule. For example, in some embodiments, the diameter of the sampling opening may be selected to be at least 1 mm smaller than the diameter of the sealing member, which may help ensure proper sealing of the capsule by the sealing member. In one exemplary embodiment, the sampling opening may have a diameter of about 5 mm.

[0024] With reference to the drawings, certain non-limiting embodiments are described in further detail. It should be understood that the disclosure is not limited to only the specific embodiments described herein, and therefore the various systems, components, features, and methods described with respect to these embodiments may be used individually and / or in any desired combination.

[0025] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a sampling capsule 102 in a gastrointestinal tract 100. As shown in FIG. 1A, the capsule 102 includes a biodegradable coating 106 (e.g., an enteric coating) that seals a sampling opening 108 of the capsule. In this manner, the biodegradable coating protects the components within the capsule cavity 104, including the sampling hydrogel 110 and the sealing member 112, and delays sampling until the capsule reaches a target location in the gastrointestinal tract. In the illustrated embodiment, the biodegradable coating covers only a portion of the capsule 102, such as covering the sampling opening 108. However, it should be understood that other arrangements may be suitable, such as an arrangement in which the biodegradable coating initially surrounds a majority of the capsule 102, or the entire exterior of the capsule 102. As shown in FIG. 1B, once the capsule 102 reaches the target location, the coating 106 degrades, allowing gastrointestinal fluids containing bacteria 114 to enter the capsule, where the fluids are absorbed by the sampling hydrogel 110. Upon absorbing fluid, the sampling hydrogel expands and swells within cavity 104, filling substantially the entire volume of the cavity. Additionally, the expansion of the sampling hydrogel pressurizes sealing member 112 into contact with the sampling opening, thereby sealing the sampling opening through the mechanical force exerted by the swollen hydrogel. As shown, the fluid absorbed by the sampling hydrogel may contain bacteria 114 from within the gastrointestinal tract. After the capsule is excreted, it may be degraded to permit recovery of the sampling hydrogel and the bacterial sample contained therein, such that the bacteria may be subjected to future culture and analysis.

[0026] For example, when a patient swallows a sampling device with a biodegradable polymer enteric coating, the device may be exposed to saliva with a pH of 7 for less than a minute. As the device moves toward the stomach, the pH drops to about 3. The device may remain inactivated because the polymer remains unionized in the acidic pH environment of the stomach. As the device moves further down the digestive tract, the pH increases as it reaches the small intestine with an average pH of 6.8 and a maximum pH of 7.5. When the pH exceeds the dissolution threshold of the enteric coating, the polymer begins to ionize, initiating dissolution of the polymer. Once dissolved, intestinal fluids enter the cavity 104 and the hydrogel may begin to swell by absorbing intestinal fluids while pushing the sealing member in the cavity toward the sampling opening. The pH then decreases as the capsule approaches the ileocecal valve and increases slightly as it continues to pass through the colon. Because the opening of the device is sealed with a sealing member, the device may move through the colon without fluid exchange.

[0027] It may take approximately 4-6 hours for the device to pass through the small intestine. Depending on the intended use of the device, the dissolution of the enteric coating and / or the elongation of the hydrogel may be tailored to the desired destination location in the small intestine. For example, in some embodiments, the enteric coating may be configured to completely dissolve 1 hour after the device enters the small intestine, then the hydrogel may be configured to elongate 1 hour, and finally, the device may be configured to be sealed by the sealing member at 0.4 hours. These time target intervals may allow a safety margin of 1.6 hours or more before the device reaches the colon. After excretion, the capsule may be collected and degraded, and samples may be analyzed for further investigation.

[0028] 2A and 2B are schematic exploded views of two embodiments of a capsule 200, 200' for passive sampling of the gastrointestinal tract. The capsule 200, 200' includes a capsule housing 202, 202' including a first housing portion 204, 204' (also referred to herein as a cap) and a second housing portion 206, 206'. The first housing portion includes a sampling opening 208, 208' for providing fluid communication between an exterior of the capsule and a cavity 210, 210' formed in the capsule housing 202, 202'. A biodegradable coating 212, 212' (e.g., an enteric coating as described above) is provided around at least a portion of the capsule housing to seal the sampling opening 208, 208' until the capsule 200, 200' reaches a desired location in the gastrointestinal tract. The sampling hydrogel 214, 21' and the sealing member 216, 216' are located within the cavity 210, 210', and as shown, the sealing member 216, 216' is located between the sampling hydrogel 214, 214' and the sampling opening 208, 208'. As noted above, in some embodiments, the sealing member may be a flexible membrane, such as a PDMS membrane, that may provide gas permeability between the cavity 210, 210' and the exterior of the capsule 200, 200' after the sealing member seals the cavity. Additionally, the first and second housing portions 204, 204' and 206, 206' include attachment interfaces 218, 218' that allow the capsule housing to be easily disassembled to retrieve the hydrogel material after the sample has been collected. In the illustrated embodiment, the attachment interfaces 218, 218' comprise corresponding threaded features formed on the first and second housing portions that cooperate to form a screw interface. However, as noted above, other attachment configurations, such as a snap fit or an interference fit, may be suitable in other embodiments.

[0029] The biodegradable coating may have different shapes. For example, the biodegradable coating may be circular, such as the circular coating 212, 212' shown in Figures 2A, 2B, respectively. In other embodiments, the biodegradable coating may be square, rectangular, oval, or any other suitable shape. In some embodiments, the biodegradable coating may have a curved outer surface, such as the biodegradable coating 212 with a curved outer surface 213 shown in Figure 2A. In some embodiments, the biodegradable coating may have a flat outer surface, such as the biodegradable coating 212' shown in Figure 2B with a flat outer surface 213'. In some embodiments, the biodegradable coating may have a flat outer surface and a flat inner surface, such as the flat disk shown in Figure 2B with a flat outer surface 213' and a flat inner surface 215'. The biodegradable coating may be any shape that seals the sampling opening 208, 208' of the capsule 200, 200'. In some embodiments, the biodegradable coating may extend across only a portion of the capsule housing 202, 202'. In some embodiments, the biodegradable coating may surround the entire exterior of the capsule housing. EXAMPLES

[0030] Research I Device Design and Construction In one example, a device for passive sampling of the gastrointestinal tract was fabricated using 3D printing. The device consisted of four components: a 3D printed housing including a biodegradable enteric coating, a first housing portion and a cap, a sampling hydrogel, and a gas-permeable PDMS membrane. The 3D printed housing was designed in SolidWorks (Dassault Systemes) and printed with a biocompatible methacrylate photocurable polymer via stereolithography using a Form 2 3D printer via the PreForm software package (FormLabs). The final outer diameter and length of the capsules were 9 mm and 15 mm, respectively. The inner and inner diameters were 7 mm and 14 mm, respectively. Each capsule was designed to include a sampling hydrogel and a 1 mm thick PDMS membrane placed between the hydrogel and a sampling opening formed in the cap. In particular, Figure 3 shows a photograph of the various components prior to assembly. The sampling opening (5 mm in diameter) in the capsule cap was designed to allow easy flow of liquid into the capsule.

[0031] In this example, superabsorbent hydrogels were synthesized using a mixture of deionized (DI) water, acrylic acid (AA) and acrylamide (AM) as monomers, methylene bis-acrylamide (MBA) as a crosslinker, and ammonium persulfate (AP) as an initiator. The crosslinked hydrogels were cut into cylindrical samples and thoroughly dried before being encapsulated. PDMS membranes were fabricated by laser cutting circular membranes with a diameter of 6.5 mm using a Class 4 CO2 Laser (Universal Laser System) using a standard 1:10 ratio of hardener-silicone base (Dow Corning) after curing at 80 °C for 3 h.

[0032] Prior to assembling the device, the surfaces of the 3D printed housing were subjected to hydrophilic surface modification to ensure and facilitate the flow of sampling fluid through the capsule opening into the capsule cavity. Surface modification was performed using air plasma treatment followed by polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment. Plasma treatment was achieved using a Tegal Corp Plasma Etcher at 480 mTorr for 2 min, followed by immersion in the PEG solution for 18 h. The housing was removed from the solution, rinsed thoroughly with deionized water, and air-dried for 24 h. After both the housing and hydrogel were completely dry, the device was assembled by placing the dried hydrogel into the bottom half of the 3D printed housing. The PDMS membrane was placed between the hydrogel and the device cap. Figure 4 shows a photograph of the final assembled capsule, which is 9 mm in diameter and 15 mm in length. This is smaller than a standard 000 size gelatin capsule (9.97 mm × 26.14 mm).

[0033] Synthesis and characterization of hydrogels In one example, four ratios of AA to AM were used to determine which ratio resulted in the fastest absorption and highest compressive force: 10% AA / 90% AM, 30% AA / 70% AM, 50% AA / 50% AM, 70% AA / 30% AM, and 90% AA / 10% AM. The total concentration of the monomer mixture was 35 wt% of the total weight of the solution. Deionized water accounted for 60 wt% of the total weight, and MBA and AP accounted for 1 wt% and 4 wt% of the total weight, respectively. The different mixtures of AA / AM were mixed with deionized water in 20 mL scintillation vials. The MBA was completely dissolved by vortexing the solution for 3 minutes using a VWR Digital Vortex System. Once the MBA was completely dissolved, the solution was bubbled with nitrogen gas for 30 minutes to remove oxygen molecules that may inhibit polymerization, followed by the addition of the initiator. The solution was allowed to polymerize for 3 hours at room temperature. After complete polymerization, cylinders of 5 mm diameter and 12 mm length were cut and dried overnight in an isothermal oven at 80 °C. Once the hydrogels were completely dry, they were considered ready for testing.

[0034] Next, the swelling ability of hydrogels with different AA / AM ratios was determined. For each AA / AM ratio, dried samples were weighed and immersed in a solution of 1:10 phosphate buffer solution (PBS), purchased from Sigma Aldrich, and deionized water for 5 h. Samples were removed from the solution and weighed every hour to measure the amount of water absorbed. The swelling response of hydrogels with different monomer ratios of 10%AA / 90%AM, 30%AA / 70%AM, 50%AA / 50%AM, 70%AA / 30%AM, and 90%AA / 10%AM is shown in Figure 5-6. In particular, Figure 5 shows photographs of fully dried (left) and fully swollen (right) hydrogels. The response is expressed as a weight ratio calculated by dividing the difference between the weight after submersion and the initial weight of the dried sample (Gt-G0) by the initial weight (G0). The general trend shown in Figure 6 indicates that as the AA to AM ratio increases, the swelling potential of the hydrogel decreases. In particular, Figure 6 shows plots of the ratios 10%AA / 90%AM (602), 30%AA / 70%AM (604), 50%AA / 50%AM (606), 70%AA / 30%AM (608), and 90%AA / 10%AM (610). The samples with the ratio 10%AA / 90%AM were found to have the fastest and greatest swelling power, reaching 2.2 times the initial dry weight within 5 hours. The only exception to this trend is seen in the samples with the ratio 90%AA / 10%AM. These samples, like the samples with the ratio 10%AA / 90%AM, show rapid absorption initially. However, despite the fast initial response, the swelling rate levels off within the first hour.

[0035] To determine whether the hydrogels could exert enough force to overcome the gastrointestinal pressure and effectively seal the capsules, the compressive force of each hydrogel upon swelling was measured using an Admet Tensile Tester. Dried hydrogels were placed in 10 mL scintillation vials and fixed vertically to the stage of the tensiometer. A PDMS membrane probe was attached to a 10 N load cell and positioned 1 mm away from the surface of each dehydrated hydrogel block. The vials were then filled with 1:10 PBS / deionized water solution, and the compressive force generated by each sample was measured and recorded as the hydrogels swelled over time and pressed against the probe.

[0036] The normal baseline pressure within the lumen of the human colon has been reported to be between 12mmHg and 20mmHg, with a maximum of 26mmHg (3466.38N / m) after a meal in constipated patients. 2 ) using the force-pressure relationship, the estimated extreme back force that can be exerted by the intraluminal pressure of the small intestine on the PDMS membrane in the capsule is equal to 0.46 N. Therefore, for complete sealing after sampling / activation, the PDMS membrane valve of the sampling capsule needed to withstand a back force of more than 0.46 N.

[0037] Figure 7 shows two photographs of dried and swollen hydrogels against the force probe, and Figure 8 shows the force profiles recorded during the hydration process of hydrogel samples made with different AA / AM ratios as a function of time. In particular, Figure 8 shows plots for ratios of 10% AA / 90% AM (802), 30% AA / 70% AM (804), 50% AA / 50% AM (806), 70% AA / 30% AM (808), and 90% AA / 10% AM (810). These results show that the force exerted on the PDMS membrane increases relatively faster in samples with lower AA / AM ratios. With the exception of the hydrogel made with a 90% AA / 10% AM monomer ratio, all other hydrogels were able to provide the necessary force during the 5-h hydration and swelling period to overcome the estimated backpressure within the lumen of the digestive tract (>0.46 N). The sample made with 10% AA / 90% AM showed the fastest increase, meeting the required force within an hour of hydration and swelling. The observed delay in the force generated at different AA / AM ratios can be directly correlated with the corresponding swelling profile. As shown in Figure 7, the dry hydrogel was placed 1 mm away from the force probe, as this is the total length the hydrogel needs to swell to seal the capsule. A faster absorption rate translates into faster detection of the force generated as the hydrogel more easily reaches the probe. Considering these results, the crosslinked hydrogel with a monomer ratio of 10% AA / 90% AM offered both the best absorption and force generation properties and was therefore used for the final assembly of the sampling capsule and further characterization, thus with optimal actuation and sampling capabilities.

[0038] Surface Wettability In one embodiment, to ensure continuous drawing of fluid from the intestine into the narrow sampling opening of the capsule, the polymer surface of the capsule was modified with a long-lasting hydrophilic coating as discussed above. To evaluate the surface modifications, surface contact angle measurements were performed on untreated, plasma-treated, and plasma+PEG-treated samples using a Rame-Hart Model290 F1 Advanced Goniometer. Initial and receding contact angle measurements were performed at ambient temperature by placing a drop of approximately 10 μL of water on the 3D-printed surfaces before and after different surface modifications.

[0039] Figures 9-10 show the results of contact angle measurements on 3D printed capsule casings before and after different surface modification procedures of plasma treatment only and plasma treatment followed by PEG coating and its stability over time. In particular, Figure 9 shows photographs of water droplets on these various surfaces and Figure 10 shows plots of contact angles over time. As shown in plot 1002, the untreated 3D printed surface exhibited a relative high water contact angle with an angle of 80°. As shown in plot 1004, the results of the plasma treated sample showed that the water contact angle immediately after plasma activation decreased from 80° to 33°, signifying the generation of a hydrophilic surface. However, despite the initial increase in hydrophilicity, the results showed that the surface modification was unstable and the contact angle increased from 33° to 60° after 5 days. On the other hand, the plasma treatment followed by PEG coating exhibited superhydrophilic surface properties with a contact angle of near 0° over the entire period of 7 days, as shown in plot 1006. The significant decrease in contact angle and its high stability over time indicates that the robustness of the plasma + PEG surface modification treatment may help ensure that intestinal fluids can easily wick up and flow through the sampling opening.

[0040] Leak Test In one example, the sealing mechanism of the capsule was tested in two independent leakage tests. In the first test, shown diagrammatically in Figure 11, the change in electrical conductivity (EC) over time was examined to detect possible leakage from the capsule after activation and sealing with a swollen hydrogel. For this test, the fully assembled capsule and bare hydrogel were submerged in a 1 M solution of sodium chloride and deionized water for 18 hours to allow the hydrogel to fully swell in both settings. They were then introduced into separate 20 mL solutions of fresh deionized water and the change in electrical resistivity was measured for 8 hours using a Gw Instek LCR-821 meter. Given that the conductivity of deionized water is low (0.05 μS / cm), the significant increase in conductivity was attributed to the exchange of fluid between the deionized water and the salt-infused hydrogel. FIG. 12 shows a plot of the change in conductivity for a solution of undisturbed deionized water (1202), deionized water after exposure to bare hydrogel (1204), and deionized water after exposure to a sealed capsule (1206). As shown, lines 1202 and 1206 overlap one another. The baseline conductivity of deionized water is close to 0.5 μS due to a lack of ions in the solution. When bare hydrogel is introduced, the conductivity of the medium increases rapidly due to the rapid exchange of fluid between the hydrogel and the environment. This scenario simulates a complete failure of the sealing mechanism, where free sodium and chloride ions are released into the fresh medium, increasing the conductivity of the system. Results for the hydrogel in the capsule show no increase in conductivity over 8 hours, suggesting no leakage from the capsule into the fresh medium.

[0041] In the second test, the fully assembled capsules and bare hydrogels were placed in a deionized water solution containing red food coloring for 18 hours to ensure complete swelling and absorption of the food coloring into both hydrogels. They were then removed and placed in another container with deionized water without opening the sealed capsule. The experimental setup for this test is shown diagrammatically in FIG. 13. From left to right, flask 1302 contained bare hydrogel 1304 in deionized water, flask 1306 contained sealed capsule 1308 in deionized water, flask 1310 contained plain deionized water, and flask 1312 contained deionized water with red food coloring dye. Comparing the solutions in flasks 1302 and 1306 reveals the differences between the bare hydrogel and the sealed capsules. A slight visible color change was observed in flask 1302 as the bare hydrogel released its contents into the solution. The solution containing the capsules sealed in flask 1306 visually resembled ordinary deionized water since the sealing mechanism prevented leakage.

[0042] Additionally, UV-Visible spectroscopy measurements were performed on 100 μL samples collected hourly from both conditions and their absorbance peaks at 510 nm were detected using a BioTek Epoch™ 2 microplate spectrophotometer. This test was used to evaluate and compare the leakage rates of absorbed / sampled food coloring from bare swollen hydrogels as well as activated and sealed capsules. The results of this test, shown in FIG. 14, confirm that the sealing mechanism prevents leakage within 8 hours. The absorption intensity of the deionized water with bare hydrogel (plot 1404) increases over time as the food coloring is released into the environment. The dramatic increase after 5 hours confirms the presence of the dye. The absorption intensity of the deionized water with sealed capsules (plot 1406) and pure deionized water (plot 1404) is comparable and remains stable over time, confirming that no fluid is exchanged between the hydrogel in the sealed capsule and the environment. The small peak observed in the sealed capsule plot 1406 reflects noise due to the detection limit of the UV spectrometer used in this example.

[0043] Bacterial sampling and viability assessment In addition to testing the effectiveness of the sealing mechanism, it was important to evaluate the ability of the hydrogel to collect bacteria and determine if culture of the recovered bacteria was achievable. The most relevant applications of this device include the ability to access currently inaccessible regions of the digestive tract to collect viable bacterial samples for subsequent culture. It is important to determine whether further fluid exchange occurs upon ingestion as well as whether the bacteria can survive once collected.

[0044] In one example, cross-sectional SEM images were obtained from the hydrogels to determine the effectiveness of bacterial sampling and understand the mechanisms by which the hydrogels may collect microorganisms. In particular, the microstructure network of the generated hydrogels and their ability to entrap bacteria within their porous matrix were evaluated using a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) after Au / Pd sputtering. SEM imaging was performed on bare and bacteria-entrapped hydrogel samples. The first hydrogel sample was placed in a solution of PBS for 8 hours, and the second hydrogel was placed in a solution of 100% TSB inoculated with E. coli. Both hydrogel samples were freeze-dried for 18 hours using a SP Scientific LyoStar3 freeze dryer before performing SEM imaging.

[0045] Figures 15A-15D show SEM images of the cross-sectional morphology of freeze-dried hydrogels submerged in a solution of deionized water (15A and 15B) and hydrogels submerged in 100% TSB inoculated with E. coli (15C and 15D). The images at low magnification (15A and 15C) show a dense network of cross-linked AA and AM monomers with pores of 10 μm to 50 μm in diameter. Figure 15B shows the clean surface of the hydrogel after swelling with deionized water. Figure 15C shows the presence of bacteria on the surface of the hydrogel submerged in the bacterial solution. These images confirm that E. coli could attach to the solid polymer network of the hydrogel. The high porosity of the developed superabsorbent hydrogel not only allows fluids containing bacteria to flow through its matrix but also allows them to be easily trapped within the bound fluids within the hydrogel.

[0046] In another example, the ability of the device to effectively sample bacteria was verified by introducing the device into a culture solution to simulate gut microbiota in a gastrointestinal environment. The ability of the capsule to protect the sampled bacteria after activation and sealing was tested in different extreme environments that would directly affect bacterial growth and viability if in direct contact. In this test, three fully assembled (but not yet activated / sealed) capsules and three bare hydrogel samples were immersed in a solution of 100% Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB, Sigma Aldrich) containing Escherichia coli and incubated at 37°C for 8 hours. During the incubation period, the bacteria in the culture medium were captured within the hydrated hydrogel matrix in the capsule and the bare hydrogel sample. Then, one activated / sealed capsule and one bare hydrogel sample were removed from the bacterial culture solution and immersed in the first solution containing PBS. Another activated / sealed capsule and one bare hydrogel sample were removed from the bacterial culture solution and immersed in a second solution containing 1000 μg / mL of tobramycin (an antibiotic) prepared in PBS. A third activated / sealed capsule and bare hydrogel sample were removed from the bacterial culture solution and immersed in a third solution of bleach diluted in a 1:10 ratio with deionized water. PBS was used as a biocompatible medium and control experiment. The tobramycin and bleach solutions were used to verify the effectiveness of the sealing mechanism of the activated capsule in protecting the sampled bacteria from an extreme hostile environment. The bare hydrogel sample containing the trapped bacteria was used as a control to evaluate the viability of the sampled bacteria when directly exposed to the three conditions. The capsule and bare hydrogel pairs were kept in each of the three test solutions for 1 hour, after which the samples were removed from the solutions and the viable bacterial counts for each condition were evaluated. The trapped bacteria were extracted by loosening the two parts of the capsule and removing the loaded hydrogel with a sterile inoculation loop into 10 mL of 100% TSB solution. The bare hydrogel sample with trapped bacteria was also transferred directly into another 10 mL vial of TSB solution.The bacteria entrapped within all hydrogel samples were extracted into TSB solution by incubating under mechanical agitation for 20 min at 37° C. The number of viable bacteria within the hydrogel samples was determined by plating the extracted solutions onto trypticase soy agar plates and counting the number of colony forming units (CFU).

[0047] Figure 16 shows pictures of TSB / agar plates with bacterial colonies collected from bare hydrogels and sealed capsules in different solutions. The bacterial concentrations of the stock solutions used for the different experiments are shown on the left. The actual CFU counts for each condition are shown in Figure 17. In this plot, one bar represents the CFU / mL of bare hydrogels after exposure, and the other bar represents the CFU / mL of hydrogels in sealed capsules. Solutions inoculated with bacteria from bare hydrogels have lower concentrations than those from hydrogels in sealed capsules across all conditions. For hydrogels submerged in PBS, the number of CFU / mL drops by three orders of magnitude when comparing bare hydrogels to hydrogels in sealed capsules. PBS is commonly used as a medium for long-term storage of bacteria due to its biocompatibility and antiseptic properties. Based on this result, bare hydrogels experience a drop in bacterial concentration due to dilution of the initial sample collected with it as it is introduced into different solutions. Despite the reduction due to dilution, the bacterial concentration of hydrogels soaked in solutions containing tobramycin and bleach is reduced more obviously. When introduced to tobramycin, the number of CFU / mL is reduced by six orders of magnitude, which is twice the reduction in PBS. Tobramycin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic, can inhibit 92% of E. coli strains at a concentration as low as 6.25 μg / mL. Based on the inhibitory ability of tobramycin, a sharp drop in bacterial concentration is expected. At the same time, the higher concentration of bacteria from hydrogels in sealed capsules suggests that the sealing mechanism protected the hydrogel from interaction with the antibiotic, as well as that the hydrogel provides a comfortable environment for maintaining the bacterial concentration for a long period of time.

[0048] The results for the hydrogel in bleach further confirm the effectiveness of the seal and the biocompatibility of the hydrogel. Bleach is a strong germicide, capable of completely killing most bacterial strains within 10 minutes of exposure. In Figure 17, no bars are shown for the bare hydrogel soaked in bleach, since the strong antibacterial properties of bleach inhibited microbial growth to the point where no colonies formed on the culture plate (Figure 16, middle image). The fact that bacteria within the sealed capsule are able to survive such a harsh environment indicates the ability of the capsule to protect samples held within the hydrogel in the less harsh environment of the digestive tract.

[0049] The ability to easily collect samples from the gastrointestinal tract and protect the microbial samples within the matrix proves the device an effective sampling agent using fast absorbing hydrogels. The simple design and passive sampling / sealing mechanism allow for low-cost manufacturing and easy reproducibility. This has resulted in an accessible tool for sampling currently inaccessible sections of the gastrointestinal tract, which will further advance our understanding of how the gut microbiota can be used as an indicator of health.

[0050] Research II Device Design and Construction In one example, a device for passive sampling of the gastrointestinal tract for calprotectin was fabricated using 3D printing. The device consisted of four components: a biodegradable enteric coating, a 3D printed housing including the first housing part and the cap, a sampling hydrogel, and a gas-permeable polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane (see Figures 2-3). The 3D printed housing was designed in SolidWorks (Dassault Systemes) and printed by stereolithography using a Form 2 printer (FormLabs) at a thickness of 50 μm with a biocompatible resin (EN-ISO 10993-1:2009 / AC:2010, USP Class VI) purchased from Formlabs. After 3D printing, the model was rinsed in 99% pure isopropyl alcohol (IPA) for 15 min to remove any residues, and then post-cured in a UV light curing device (Formlabs Inc.) for 60 min to complete the polymerization. The final outer diameter and length of the capsules were 9 mm and 15 mm, respectively. The inner and outer diameters were 5.6 mm and 13 mm, respectively. Each capsule was designed to contain a sampling hydrogel and a PDMS membrane positioned between the hydrogel and a sampling opening formed in the cap. The sampling opening was 4 mm in diameter.

[0051] PDMS membranes were fabricated using a standard 1:10 ratio of curing agent to silicone base (Dow Corning) and cured for 4 h at 70 °C. Disks (5.5 mm diameter, 2 mm height) were cut using a computer-controlled CO2 laser (10.6 μm wavelength) cutting and engraving system (PLS6MW, Universal Laser, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ).

[0052] pH-sensitive polymer enteric coating The pH of the digestive tract generally varies from 1 to 7.5. The inventors have recognised that anionic polymers containing carboxyl groups are insoluble at the low pH of the stomach, but soluble at the neutral pH of the intestine, and therefore may be used as enteric coatings for sampling devices to activate selective sampling via the digestive tract.

[0053] The dissolution behavior of five pH-sensitive polymers in different pH solutions was analyzed: (1) polymethacrylic acid-co-ethyl acrylate (Eudragit® L100-55, Evonik, New Jersey) ("L100-55"), (2) polymethacrylic acid-co-methyl methacrylate (Eudragit® L100, Evonik, New Jersey) ("L100"), (3) hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate (HP-55) polymer (GM Chemie Pvt. Ltd, India) ("Chemie"), (4) a second HP-55 polymer (Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Japan) ("Shinetsu"), and (5) cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) (GM Chemie Pvt. Ltd, India) ("CAP"). L100-55, Chemie and Shinetsu have a dissolution pH threshold of 5.5, while L100 has a dissolution pH threshold of 6.

[0054] Polymer films were fabricated using solution coating techniques. For the L100-55 and L100 polymers, EUDRAGIT® powder (3.8 g) was dissolved in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) (9.5 g) and acetone (6.32 g) and vortexed for 10 min followed by water bath sonication for 1 h (Model 2510, Branson, Danbury, CT). Once the powder was completely dissolved, triethyl citrate (TEC) (0.38 g; Sigma-Aldrich) was added as a plasticizer and the solution was stirred for 2 min. For the Chemie and Shinetsu polymers, methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer powder (1.29 g) was dissolved in water (3.716 g) and ethanol (14.864 g; Sigma-Aldrich) by vortexing for 15 min followed by water bath sonication for 30 min. Once completely dissolved, triethyl citrate (TEC) (0.129 g) was added to the solution and stirred for 2 min. For the CAP polymer, CAP powder (1.42 g) was dissolved in water (0.547 g) and triacetin (355 g; Sigma-Aldrich) by vortexing for 15 min followed by water bath sonication for 30 min. To calculate the calibration curve and measure the dissolution of the polymer over time, methylene blue (40 mg; Sigma-Aldrich) was added to each polymer solution to enhance visualization.

[0055] Doctor blade coating technique was used to form thin polymer films (MSK-AFA-II, MTI, USA). Each polymer solution was spread on an acrylic sheet substrate using a doctor blade and sintered at 70 °C for 4 h. A 0.5 mm gauge blade (Precision Brand) was used for L-100, L-100-55, and CAP solutions, and a 1.25 mm gauge blade was used for Chemie and Shinetsu solutions to form a 50 μm thick dry film. Once the film was completely dry, 10 mm coated disks were cut using a CO2 laser cutter machine and introduced into pH buffer solution. Triplicate samples were collected at 10 min intervals and UV-Visible spectroscopy of each sample was performed using a BMG Clariostar plate reader (BMG Labtech, Germany).

[0056] Calibration curves for each polymer were obtained using separate vessels filled with 40 mL of pH 7.4, representing 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% dissolution. One disk was placed in the vessel representing 25% dissolution, two disks in the vessel representing 50% dissolution, three disks in the vessel representing 75% dissolution, and four disks in the vessel representing 100% dissolution. To avoid photodegradation of the dye, all vessels were sealed, covered with aluminum foil, and then placed on a shaking platform for complete dissolution. Once the disks were completely dissolved, 200 μL of each vessel was dispensed into a 96-well plate and the absorbance was measured on a BMG Clariostar plate reader. Calibration curves were plotted against the wavelength maximum of methylene blue (λ max = 666 nm) for each polymer in pH 7.4 buffer. The absorbance of blank buffer medium was measured and subtracted from the absorbance of the dye-loaded polymer to remove interferences.

[0057] Next, for the dissolution experiments, four coated disks from each polymer solution were submerged in 40 mL of various pHs, including 1.2 and 3.0 (mimicking the gastric acidic environment of the stomach in fasted and fed modes) and pH 6.8 (mimicking the pH of the small intestine). Similar to the method used to obtain the calibration curve, the containers were sealed and covered with aluminum foil to avoid photodegradation of the dye. At 10 min intervals, 200 µL of the solution was transferred to a 96-well plate and absorbance values ​​were measured with a UV-VIS spectrometer. The absorbance data were converted to dissolution percentages over time by comparison with the previously obtained dissolution curves of each polymer. Figure 18A-C show the dye release profiles of each polymer coating at gastric pH (pH 1.2 for fasted and pH 3.0 for fed modes) and small intestine (pH 6.8).

[0058] In the dissolution profiles of the polymers at pH 1.2 (FIG. 18A), all polymers remained intact except for Chemie and Shinetsu, which started to partially dissolve after about 20 minutes and had dissolutions of 34±1.8% and 28±1.7%, respectively. Chemie and Shinetsu showed similar degradation at pH 3.0, while L100-55, CAP, and L100 showed negligible dissolutions of 10.4±2.3%, 14.2±1.0, and 14.3±2.1%, respectively, which still prevented any inflow into the capsule when exposed to a real environment (FIG. 18B). Conversely, at pH 6.8, all organic formulations were completely dissolved within 2 hours except for L100 (dissolution of 32.3±2.6) (FIG. 18C). The dissolution order of organic enteric coatings can be detailed by pKa and backbone structure. For example, L100 had a higher pKa value and exhibited a higher pH threshold, so it was partially dissolved at pH 6.8. The water-insoluble backbone of CAP caused it to dissolve slower than Chemie and Shinetsu. Overall, the dissolution order of the enteric-coated formulations was Chemie was almost equal to Shinetsu>L100-55>CAP>L100. L100-55 was selected for further capsule experiments because of its low dissolution in acidic environment and rapid dissolution in high pH conditions.

[0059] Hydrogel synthesis and characterization In one example, acrylamide (4.5 g; Sigma-Aldrich) and N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) (0.15 g; Sigma-Aldrich) as a crosslinker were dissolved in 10 mL of water by vortexing the solution at room temperature for 3 min using a Signature Digital Vortex Mixer 945303 (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA). The solution was thoroughly degassed by bubbling nitrogen gas for 10 min to replace dissolved oxygen as a polymerization inhibitor. Ammonium persulfate (0.1 g; Sigma-Aldrich) was then added to the solution as an initiator. The pregel solution was transferred to a PDMS mold cylinder in a volume of 150 μL, and the mold was placed in an isothermal oven at 70 °C overnight to form the acrylamide network and fully harden. For the swelling ratio, three dry identical hydrogels were weighed and immersed in 25 ml of buffers of pH 6.8 and 7.4 at 37°C for 36 h in an incubator equipped with a shaking platform at 100 rpm. The hydrogels were removed from the buffer at 10 min intervals and the excess buffer on the outer surface was gently blotted with a wiper. The mass of each hydrogel was measured. The swelling ratio was calculated as Swelling Ratio = (W t -W i ) / W i where Wt and Wi are the weights of the swollen and dry hydrogels, respectively.

[0060] In this example, the swelling rate of hydrogels was investigated by measuring the swelling ratio and swelling rate. Figure 19A shows a photograph of a completely dried hydrogel (left) and a hydrogel swollen for 4 h at 37 °C in a pH 6.8 buffer containing methylene blue to enhance contrast (right). As shown in Figure 19B, the results of the swelling ratio experiment show high diffusivity of water into pre-existing or dynamically formed gaps between hydrogel chains before approaching a plateau at 14 h. Given that the sampling time is limited to 2 h, the swelling exceeds 130%, indicating sufficient water uptake by the hydrogel to activate the sampling / sealing mechanism.

[0061] The elongation of the hydrogel was also investigated to determine when the PDMS membrane blocks the capsule. For the elongation experiment, the same procedure was followed as for the swelling ratio experiment. Pictures were taken at 10 min intervals and analyzed using ImageJ software to measure the change in length. The results show that within 60 min, there is a rapid increase in length that moves the PDMS membrane in close proximity to the sampling opening (Figure 19C). At this point, the hydrogel is longitudinally confined to the capsule reservoir, so as swelling continues, the hydrogel continues to exert a compressive force towards the PDMS membrane.

[0062] The hydrogel compressive force during swelling was recorded using an Admet Tensile Tester. The capsule with the dried hydrogel was placed in a container and a probe attached to a 10N load cell was placed on top of the hydrogel. The container was then filled with pH buffer while stirring with an overhead mixer (Model 50006-03, Cole Parmer, IL, USA) at 100 rpm to mimic the turbulence of the gastrointestinal environment. The force generated for each hydrogel was recorded over time and converted to pressure based on the cross-sectional area of ​​the hydrogel. Within 2 hours, the compressive force exerted by the hydrogel exceeded 1.7N over an area of ​​7.07mm^2, which is enough force to exceed the maximum intraluminal pressure of 100kPa after force-pressure conversion. Figure 19D shows that the hydrogel can effectively exceed the maximum gastrointestinal pressure about 20 minutes after it contacts the PDMS membrane to seal the capsule and prevent fluid exchange. For all characterizations, the two pH buffers, 6.8 and 7.4, consistently showed similar trends, suggesting similar hydrogel behavior over various pH ranges throughout the small intestine.

[0063] Protein sampling and extraction To evaluate the sampling performance of the sampling capsules, three different proteins with similar size and molecular weight were tested, including green fluorescent protein (GFP), bovine serum albumin (BSA), and calprotectin (a biomarker of inflammation). GFP was chosen to provide a visual indication of protein capture within the hydrogel composition (Figure 20A-D).

[0064] GFP loading and characterization GFP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was diluted with PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to achieve a GFP concentration of 100 μg / mL. The solution was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 1 min (Sorvall Legend Micro 21 Microcentrifuge, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) to precipitate GFP aggregates. Hydrogels were introduced into the GFP supernatant for 2 h to qualitatively display the protein sampling efficiency throughout the hydrogel structure. Images were captured with a High Performance 2UV Transilluminator UVP (Upland, CA, USA) and a digital inverted microscope (AMG EVOS fl, Bothell, WA). To monitor the GFP extraction behavior of the hydrogels, they were exposed to 4 mL of PBS for 2 h and fluorescence analysis (excitation at maximum 488 nm and emission at maximum 510 nm) was performed at 30 min intervals via a BMG Clariostar plate reader. At each time point, triplicate 100 μL aliquots were transferred to UV-transparent 96-well microplates purchased from Corning (NY, USA) and fluorescence was measured.

[0065] Due to the large hydrogel pore size, GFP with an average diameter of 5 nm can permeate the hydrogel matrix shown in Figure 20A, which compares hydrogels exposed to GFP solution (left) and deionized (DI) water (right) under UV light. Microscopic images taken from the same hydrogels also confirm the absence of color change in the sample submerged in DI water (Figure 20B) compared to the sample exposed to GFP solution for 2 hours (Figure 20C).

[0066] Protein extraction from the hydrogels over time was also measured. GFP-loaded hydrogels were introduced into phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fluorescence was measured at 30 min intervals. Results showed a spike in fluorescence intensity within the first 30 min, indicating rapid release of protein from the sample, after which equilibrium was achieved at a relatively constant intensity (Figure 20C). This rapid protein delivery is attributed to large voids formed within the hydrogel structure during polymerization that facilitate the extraction process. Extraction studies confirmed the release of GFP from the hydrogels within 60 min of exposure to PBS (Figure 20D).

[0067] Loading and characterization of BSA Next, the sampling and extraction of BSA protein was investigated. BSA has an average diameter of approximately 7 nm. Bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was serially diluted 2-fold from 10 to 0.625 mg / mL in PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for a total of five concentrations (10, 5, 2.5, 1.25, and 0.625 mg / mL). Capsules without enteric coating were immersed in the BSA solution for 2 h at 100 rpm. Subsequently, the capsules were collected, disassembled, and introduced into PBS medium for 2 h of extraction. To confirm the presence of BSA in the extraction PBS solution, the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay was used to detect the protein content. 25 μL of each standard sample and unknown sample was added to a microplate well, followed by 200 μL of working reagent. After incubation at 37°C for 30 min, the plates were cooled to room temperature and the absorbance was measured at 562 nm using a BMG CLARIOstar Plus microplate reader.

[0068] The UV-Visible spectroscopy absorption of the test environment concentrations diluted 1:10 showed an absorbance peak at 562 nm, so 562 nm was selected as the wavelength to measure absorbance (see FIG. 21A). To obtain a calibration curve for BSA sampling extraction, triplicate capsules without polymer coating were stirred at 100 rpm for 2 hours at various test environment concentrations to capture samples, taking into account peristaltic interference. The capsules were then removed, opened, and introduced into PBS for 2 hours for extraction. The total concentration of BSA in the extraction solution was determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay. The absorbance observed for various concentrations of extraction PBS solutions is shown in FIG. 21B, and the amount of BSA extracted from capsules submerged in test environments with different BSA concentrations is shown in FIG. 21C. As can be seen, the amount of BSA extracted exhibits a reliably linear trend with respect to the BSA concentration of the test environment.

[0069] Calprotectin loading and characterization Calprotectin (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA) was reconstituted in Tris buffer (20 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) to a concentration of 1 mg / mL. The protein solution was further diluted to four different concentrations. A fully assembled capsule was immersed in 4 mL of each concentration for 2 h while the vial was stirred at 100 rpm. The capsule was then opened and the contents transferred to 4 mL of buffer and extracted again for 2 h at 100 rpm. Measurement of calprotectin was by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following the standard manufacturer's protocol (4–240 ng / mL) and analyzed using a BUHLMANN fCAL ELISA. The extraction buffer was loaded into a 96-well plate coated with the capture antibody. After 30 min of incubation and washing, a detection antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was added, which attached the detection antibody to the calprotectin. After incubation and washing, tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was added (forming a blue color) followed by stop solution (turning yellow). Absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a BMG CLARIOstar Plus microplate reader.

[0070] For extraction, the capsule contents were buffer exchanged into Tris buffer for 2 hours with stirring at 100 rpm. Extracted calprotectin concentrations were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compared to the test environment concentrations (Figure 21E) according to the calprotectin standard curve (Figure 21D). The linear trends obtained from the sampling extraction experiments for both BSA and calprotectin (Figure 21C, Figure 21E), with extracted concentration / test environment concentration (E values) being 2.6% and 3.2% for BSA and calprotectin, respectively, indicate a reliable correlation between extracted and test environment concentrations.

[0071] In vitro dye sampling To evaluate the sampling performance of the capsules at actual GI transit times, fully assembled capsules were assembled in different aqueous colors and buffers at pH 7, 3, 6.8, and 7.4 shown in FIG. 22A (left to right). These pH environments help model the pH changes along the GI tract. Based on GI residence time, groups of three capsules were introduced in each of the aforementioned pH buffers for 1 min, 2 h, 2 h, and 18 h in sequence. After each time slot, the capsules were opened and observed for liquid penetration or color change of the hydrogel. Capsules opened after 2 h of retention in the stomach (pH 3) showed an intact enteric coating and no change in hydrogel color and liquid contents in the housing (FIG. 22B). This proves the efficiency of the polymer to resist dissolution in an acidic environment. Conversely, capsules opened after 2 h of confinement in the small intestine (pH 6.8 buffer) showed a completely dissolved enteric coating and produced a swollen blue hydrogel with buffer contents in the sampling reservoir (FIG. 22C). To evaluate the performance of the capsule sealing before and after sampling, the absorbance of the buffer solution was detected before and after introducing the capsule into the buffer solution. The results revealed no addition of peaks (i.e., no fluid exchange), suggesting proper sealing of the capsule (Figure 22D-F).

[0072] In vitro sampling of BSA and calprotectin Two experiments were performed in vitro to study capsule efficiency in sampling BSA and calprotectin. Four different pH buffers were provided: pH 7, 3, 6.8, and 7.4. Proteins were injected only in the pH 6.8 buffer (a buffer simulating the small intestine).

[0073] In the first experiment, BSA was used as the target analyte and sampled in a pH 6.8 solution (simulating the small intestine). For all in vitro studies, three capsules were used and the average of the extracted analytes was reported. After capsules were retrieved in the experiment, the sampled analytes in the hydrogel were extracted by removing them from the capsule and introducing them into another PBS containing vial for 2 h. The amount of BSA extracted from the hydrogel was determined by BCA assay and UV-vis spectroscopy, which showed similar extracted concentrations compared to those performed in the previous buffer test condition (Figure 23A). In the second experiment, calprotectin was used as the target compound to be sampled and was added to the simulating small intestine (pH 6.8) solution and the output was identified by ELISA. The results extracted from the test environment concentrations at normal calprotectin levels (<100 μg / mL) were consistent with the concentrations in the buffer experiment supporting the reliability of the capsule sampling performance in the in vitro test conditions (Figure 23B).

[0074] Ex vivo protectin sampling Next, the effect of intestinal fluid complexity on the capsule sampling performance was investigated by performing ex vivo experiments. Calprotectin was added to freshly dissected porcine small intestine followed by a sampling extraction procedure (Figure 24A-C). Figure 24A shows a segment of calprotectin-loaded intestinal fluid-filled small intestine with two sampling capsules inside. Figure 24B shows the recovery of the capsules. Figure 24C shows a disassembled capsule with sampled intestinal fluid placed in Tris buffer for 2 hours of extraction. As shown in Figure 24D, two test environment concentrations were selected such that both normal (113 μg / mL) and elevated (745.5 μg / mL) calprotectin levels were tested. The ex vivo extraction values ​​of 3.85 μg / mL and 27.5 μg / mL show no significant difference relative to the E value of 2.6% achieved in the buffer and in vitro experiments. Overall, the sampling capsule appears to be a reliable device that can site-specifically capture calprotectin from the small intestine and effectively protect it until the capsule is excreted from the body. In this example, the device contained a hydrogel with an enteric coating dissolution time of 1 hour after entering the small intestine, and a swelling and capsule sealing time of 1.4 hours. Since the residence time in the small intestine is usually 4-6 hours, an average sampling time of 2.4 hours was chosen to allow for a rest time of 1.6 hours, thereby allowing for all unnecessary long steps that may occur during the capsule sampling process inside the small intestine.

[0075] Various aspects of the present disclosure may be used alone, in combination, or in various arrangements not specifically described in the above embodiments, and therefore are not limited in their application to the details and arrangements of components shown in the above description or illustrated in the drawings. For example, aspects described in one embodiment may be combined in any manner with aspects described in other embodiments. Thus, although the present teachings have been described in conjunction with various embodiments and examples, it is not intended that the present teachings be limited to such embodiments or examples. On the contrary, the present teachings encompass various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as will be understood by those skilled in the art. Thus, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only.

Claims

1. 1. A device for passive sampling of the gastrointestinal tract, comprising: a capsule housing defining a cavity; a sampling opening formed in the capsule housing and providing fluid communication between the cavity and an exterior of the capsule housing; a sampling hydrogel located within the cavity, the sampling hydrogel configured, upon exposure to a sample fluid, to absorb the sample fluid, expand within the cavity, and store the sample fluid for subsequent analysis; a sealing member positioned within the cavity between the sampling hydrogel and the sampling opening, wherein expansion of the sampling hydrogel within the cavity pressurizes the sealing member into engagement with the sampling opening to seal the cavity.

2. 10. The device of claim 1, further comprising a biodegradable coating covering the sampling opening, the degradation of the biodegradable coating exposing the sampling opening to allow fluid to flow into the cavity.

3. The device of claim 2 , wherein the biodegradable coating is an enteric coating configured to degrade in place within the digestive tract.

4. The device of claim 1 , wherein the capsule housing comprises a hydrophilic coating.

5. The device of claim 4 , wherein the hydrophilic coating is formed by exposing the capsule housing to a plasma treatment followed by a polyethylene glycol treatment.

6. The device of claim 1 , wherein the sampling hydrogel is synthesized from acrylic acid and acrylamide monomers.

7. 7. The device of claim 6, wherein the ratio of acrylic acid monomers to acrylamide monomers is about 10% acrylic acid monomers and about 90% acrylamide monomers.

8. The device of claim 1 , wherein the sealing member is at least partially gas permeable.

9. The device of claim 8 , wherein the sealing member is a polydimethylsiloxane membrane.

10. The device of claim 1 , wherein the capsule housing comprises a first housing portion and a second housing portion that are removably attachable to one another to form the capsule housing.

11. The device of claim 10 , wherein the first and second housing portions are attachable to one another via a screw interface.

12. The device of claim 10 , wherein the sampling opening is formed in the first housing portion.

13. 10. The device of claim 1, wherein the sampling hydrogel is constructed and arranged to maintain viable bacteria present in the sample fluid viable for at least one hour after the capsule is sealed.

14. 14. The device of claim 13, wherein the sampling hydrogel is constructed and arranged to maintain viable bacteria present in the sample fluid for up to 24 hours after the capsule is sealed.

15. The device of claim 1 , wherein the sampling hydrogel is the only component within the capsule housing that is configured to absorb the sample fluid.

16. 1. A method for passive sampling of the gastrointestinal tract of a patient, comprising: To the patient, a capsule housing defining a cavity; a sampling opening formed in the capsule housing and providing fluid communication between the cavity and an exterior of the capsule housing; a sampling hydrogel positioned within the cavity; a sealing member positioned within the cavity between the sampling hydrogel and the sampling opening; and exposing the sampling hydrogel to a sample fluid within the patient's gastrointestinal tract; Absorbing the sample fluid into the sampling hydrogel; expanding the sampling hydrogel within the cavity through absorption of the sample fluid; pressurizing the sealing member into engagement with the sampling opening via expansion of the sampling hydrogel to seal the cavity; retrieving the device after it has passed through the patient's gastrointestinal tract; and and recovering the sample fluid from the sampling hydrogel after recovering the device.

17. The method of claim 15, further comprising analyzing the sample fluid after recovering the sample fluid from the sampling hydrogel.

18. 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising maintaining viable bacteria present in the sampling fluid viable for at least 1 hour after sealing the cavity.

19. 20. The method of claim 18, wherein the viable bacteria present in the sampling fluid remain viable for up to 24 hours after sealing the cavity.

20. 1. A device for passive sampling of the gastrointestinal tract, comprising: a capsule housing defining a cavity; a sampling opening formed in the capsule housing and providing fluid communication between the cavity and an exterior of the capsule housing; a solution-cast enteric coating covering the sampling opening, wherein degradation of the enteric coating exposes the sampling opening to allow access to the cavity.

21. 21. The device of claim 20, wherein the solution-cast enteric coating is formed with a doctor blade.

22. 21. The device of claim 20, wherein the enteric coating is configured to degrade at a predetermined location in the digestive tract.

23. 21. The device of claim 20, wherein the enteric coating has a thickness of 50 μm.

24. 21. The device of claim 20, wherein the enteric coating comprises a material selected from carboxylic acid groups, polymethacrylic acid-co-ethyl acrylate, polymethacrylic acid-co-methyl methacrylate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate polymer, hypromellose phthalate, cellulose acetate phthalate, and polyvinyl acetate phthalate.

25. 21. The device of claim 20, wherein the enteric coating has a flat outer surface.

26. 21. The device of claim 20, wherein the enteric coating extends over only a portion of the capsule housing.

27. 21. The device of claim 20, wherein the sampling opening is formed in a recess in the capsule housing, and the enteric coating is received in the recess.

28. 21. The device of claim 20, wherein the enteric coating is circular.

29. 21. The device of claim 20, wherein the enteric coating surrounds the entire exterior of the capsule housing.

30. 21. The device of claim 20, further comprising a sampling hydrogel located within the cavity, wherein upon exposure to a sample fluid, the sampling hydrogel is configured to absorb the sample fluid, expand within the cavity, and store the sample fluid for subsequent analysis.

31. 1. A method of manufacturing a device for passive sampling of the gastrointestinal tract, comprising: providing a capsule housing having a cavity and a sampling opening, the sampling opening providing fluid communication between the cavity and an exterior of the capsule housing; forming an enteric coating over said sampling opening using a solution casting technique to cover said sampling opening.

32. 32. The method of claim 31 , wherein the solution casting technique comprises using a doctor blade.

33. 32. The method of claim 31 , wherein the enteric coating is formed on only a portion of the capsule housing.

34. 32. The method of claim 31 , wherein the enteric coating is formed as a planar surface.

35. 32. The method of claim 31, further comprising providing a sampling hydrogel within the cavity, wherein upon exposure to a sample fluid, the sampling hydrogel is configured to absorb the sample fluid, expand within the cavity, and store the sample fluid for subsequent analysis.

36. The device of claim 1 , wherein the sampling hydrogel is synthesized from acrylamide monomers.

37. 21. The device of claim 20, wherein the solution cast enteric coating is formed by drop casting.

38. The method of claim 31 , wherein the solution casting technique comprises drop casting.

Images