Apparatus and method for monitoring a spindle unit - Patents.com

Abstract

To provide a device and method for monitoring a work spindle that makes it possible to recognize incorrect tool clamping with high accuracy and reliability.SOLUTION: In a device for recording deformation of a rotor head (5) or a work spindle, at least one magnet (14) is arranged on a stator (2) or a rotor of the work spindle. The magnetic field of the magnet penetrates a measurement section (10) of the rotor head (5), which is traversed by an axial flow of force during clamping of a tool or tool carrier on the rotor head (5) by a tool clamping device arranged in the rotor.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to Spindle Unit The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for monitoring Arbeitsspindel. [Background technology]

[0002] Insufficient tool clamping can occur if debris is present on the contact surface between the machine tool and the tool. Debris can consist of scraps of material which inevitably occur during machining of the workpiece. Machining defects can occur due to misalignment or misalignment of the tool. These effects are further intensified by the use of long tools. In order to increase production quality and reduce rejects, it is desirable to be able to recognize even before machining begins that an incorrect tool clamping has occurred. It has therefore already been proposed to check the quality of tool clamping in machine tools by monitoring the tool contact surface.

[0003] The document US 2007 / 0133633 discloses a monitoring device in which a measuring device is provided on the circumferential surface of the spindle head, which detects lateral or circumferential variations or deformations due to imbalance conditions or the presence of debris. The measuring device can be a mechanical dial gauge with an attached probe on the circumferential surface of the spindle head, or the sensor can be arranged on the spindle head as an inductive or capacitive sensor or in the form of a strain gauge. The possibility of using mechanized, electrical, electromechanical, acoustic or optical measuring devices is also mentioned. However, apart from a mechanical dial gauge, no specific implementation of the above mentioned types of measuring device is mentioned. The sensor is arranged to measure the rotational speed of the rotor. Spindle Unit The rotor is disposed at a portion protruding forward from the stator.

[0004] Spindle UnitMechanical probing of the circumferential surface of the rotor head with a dial gauge requires a slow rotation of the rotor and subsequent removal of the probe from the rotor surface at normal operating speed. Dynamic measuring systems, in which a sensor mechanism is provided on the rotor and power and data transmission takes place between the stator and the rotor, are laborious and therefore costly to implement and can be replaced only at great expense. The mechanical stiffness of the rotor is reduced by incorporating sensors. The measuring system for measuring the eccentricity in the vicinity of the tool extends into the machining space. It is undesirable to provide sensors there, since chips may accumulate there and it is difficult to protect the sensors. It is only possible with difficulty to mount an additional measuring ring on the rotor so that all deformations are detected. If the eccentricity is measured at a distance from the tool, corresponding deformations of the lower part of the rotor occur, which impairs the measurement accuracy. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0005] [Patent Document 1] European Patent No. 1889685 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0006] In view of the above, the object of the present invention is to overcome the shortcomings of the prior art and to provide a method for preventing the clamping of a tool or a tool carrier. Spindle Unit To enable accurate and reliable recognition of incorrect tool tightening by measuring the deformation of the rotor head of the rotor. Spindle Unit The present invention provides an apparatus and method for monitoring a [Means for solving the problem]

[0007] This object is achieved according to the invention by an apparatus having the features of claim 1 and by a method having the features of claim 11. Advantageous refinements of the invention are set forth in the corresponding dependent claims.

[0008] The rotor head according to the present invention Spindle Unit In the device for detecting deformation of Spindle Unit At least one magnet is arranged on the stator or rotor of the rotor head, the magnetic field of which penetrates a measurement portion of the rotor head traversed by an axial force flow during clamping of a tool or tool carrier on the rotor head by a tool clamping device arranged on the rotor, the rotor head having an axially varying magnetic permeability or susceptibility in its measurement portion, and at least one direction-dependent magnetic field sensor is arranged on the stator diametrically opposite the measurement portion of the rotor head and is connected to an evaluation device, the evaluation device being configured to determine a measured value of the axial deformation of the rotor head as a function of the rotation angle from the strength of the magnetic field as a function of the rotation angle detected by the magnetic field sensor during one rotation of the rotor.

[0009] In this way, the average axial deformation of the rotor head in the circumferential direction, which depends on the clamping force of the tool clamping device, can be measured and thus monitored, and also variations in the circumferential deformation can be measured, which clearly indicate the presence of contamination on the contact surface between the clamped tool or tool carrier and the rotor head, in particular in the form of chips on the front contact surface of the rotor head. The magnetic field sensor is contact-free during operation and does not require any signal transmission between the rotor and the stator. The sensor and the entire electronic circuit for signal processing can be accommodated in one place in the stator, where it is protected from any kind of debris and mechanical influences.

[0010] It is also advantageous if the evaluation device is configured to determine a measurement value for the axial position of the rotor head relative to the stator from the strength of the magnetic field as a function of the rotation angle detected by the magnetic field sensor during one revolution of the rotor. Spindle UnitThe systematic axial displacement of the rotor relative to the stator during operation (known as spindle expansion, the extent of which needs to be known in order to compensate for it during tool axial positioning) can be detected by the same sensor.

[0011] Preferably, magnets with radially arranged poles are arranged on the stator diametrically opposite the measuring part of the rotor head, which has at least two circumferentially extending grooves on its surface and separated from each other in the axial direction. With this structure, strong magnetic distortions at the sensor location can easily arise from axial deformations and / or displacements of the rotor head.

[0012] The groove preferably has at least one marking extending a certain length in the circumferential direction at one point in the circumferential direction of the measuring part of the rotor head in the form of a break or a certain degree of axial offset, whereby a zero reference point of the rotation angle of the rotor head is created, which can be detected by the magnetic field sensor itself, so that no additional sensor mechanism is required for this purpose. If a certain degree of axial displacement is used as the marking, there is furthermore the possibility of self-calibrating the magnetic field, so that a known amount of axial offset can be assigned to the signal change occurring when passing through the offset groove part.

[0013] Instead of magnets on the stator and grooves in the rotor head, at least three magnets can be arranged axially one after the other in the measuring part of the rotor head, or at least three axially consecutive regions of the rotor head can be magnetized, with the magnetic poles being arranged radially, and with the radially aligned magnetic poles being arranged in opposite directions for every two axially consecutive magnets or magnetized regions, so that during axial deformation or displacement of the rotor head, an axial magnetic distortion also occurs through the magnetic field sensor.

[0014] Similar to the axial offset of a single interruption or groove, the magnet or magnetized area arranged in the measurement portion of the rotor head may have a marking extending a predetermined length in the circumferential direction at least at one location in the circumferential direction of the measurement portion of the rotor head in the form of a interruption in the magnetization or a predetermined degree of axial offset of the magnetization to create a zero reference point of the rotor rotation angle so as to enable self-calibration of the magnetic field sensor.

[0015] The magnetic field sensor is preferably a magnetoresistive sensor having at least one bridge circuit consisting of a plurality of resistors, the value of each of which depends on the strength and direction of the magnetic field passing through it, such that the axial variation of the permeability or magnetic susceptibility of the measurement portion of the rotor head is periodic and the geometric arrangement of the resistors is axially adapted to this axial variation, so that when the rotor head is displaced axially relative to the stator by one period of the axial variation, a periodic waveform of the output signal of the bridge circuit is obtained as a function of the axial displacement of the rotor head having the same period length.

[0016] Magnetoresistive sensors are highly sensitive and therefore have a pronounced directional dependence, which is essential for implementation according to the invention. This allows position and deformation measurements with extremely high resolution in the nanometer range. The sensor configuration coupled with the axial variation of permeability or susceptibility greatly simplifies the conversion of changes in the sensor signal into position or deformation.

[0017] The evaluation device preferably comprises a memory, which is configured to store a reference signal derived from at least one sensor signal recorded during one revolution of the rotor with the correctly clamped tool or tool carrier, and to determine the axial deformation of the rotor head by the deviation between the signal derived from the at least one sensor signal recorded during one revolution of the rotor with the clamped tool or tool carrier and the stored reference signal. Interference effects such as noise in the recorded measurement signals can be largely eliminated, since here we do not mean a temporal noise, but a spatial noise, i.e. a systematic offset of the recorded measurement signals.

[0018] The evaluation device is preferably configured to derive a signal from the axial deformation of the rotor head which indicates an incorrect clamping state of the tool or the tool carrier, which may consist either of a contamination of the contact surface between the rotor head and the tool or of an insufficient clamping force as a result of defects or excessive wear in the tool clamping device.

[0019] Furthermore, several direction-dependent magnetic field sensors can be arranged on the stator diametrically opposite the measurement part of the rotor head, separated from one another in the circumferential direction of the stator and each connected to an evaluation device. Such an arrangement can speed up the measurement, since it is not necessary to rotate the rotor one full revolution in order to record the axial position of the measurement part of the rotor head over the entire circumference of the rotor head, which means that measurements can be made at several positions along the circumference of the rotor head simultaneously with the rotor at rest.

[0020] By the device according to the present invention Spindle Unit The method for monitoring a) The tool or tool carrier Spindle Unit recording at least one signal derived from the at least one signal generated by the magnetic field sensor during one rotation of the rotor while clamped to the rotor of the rotor; b) calculating from the recorded signals a position signal indicative of the axial position of a measurement portion of the rotor head diametrically opposite the magnetic field sensor as a function of the angle of rotation of the rotor during one revolution of the rotor; c) calculating a difference signal from the calculated position signal and a reference signal stored in a memory as a function of the rotation angle of the rotor during one revolution of the rotor; d) determining at least one measure of axial deformation of the rotor head from the calculated difference signal; e) comparing the determined measured value of the axial deformation of the rotor head with a limit value and generating a status signal as a function of the result of the comparison, which indicates that the clamped tool or tool carrier is in an incorrect clamped state.

[0021] By forming the difference between the position signal calculated from the recorded measured values ​​and the stored reference signal, interference effects can be largely eliminated and a reliable measured value can be determined that indicates the deformation of the rotor head, which means that it is easy to evaluate whether the clamping state of the tool or tool carrier is correct or incorrect by comparing it with limit values.

[0022] During correct tightening of an equivalent tool or tool carrier, a reference signal is preferably determined using steps a) and b) and then stored in a memory, so that criteria for evaluating the current tightening state as correct or incorrect are easily defined.

[0023] During step c), corresponding average values ​​of the position signal and the reference signal are preferably calculated, which average values ​​are first subtracted from each of the two signals. The mean free reference signal is subtracted from the mean free position signal to calculate a difference signal, the status signal indicating the presence or absence of debris between the clamped tool or tool carrier and the surface of the rotor head. Due to the subtraction of the corresponding average values, systematic offsets in the sensor signals have no effect on the accuracy of the calculation of the deviation between the current position signal and the reference signal.

[0024] If during the step of determining the reference signal steps a) and b) are carried out in a first run without applying axial stress to the rotor head, then steps a) and b) are carried out in a second run with an equivalent tool or tool carrier that has been correctly clamped, the reference signal is calculated by subtracting the position signals acquired during the first run from the position signals acquired during the second run, and during the execution of step c) corresponding average values ​​of the position signals and the reference signal are calculated, then the average value of the reference signals is subtracted from the average value of the position signals to calculate a difference signal, a status signal can be generated indicating that the clamping force output by the tool clamping device was insufficient. Thus, further types of error functions for the clamping of the tool can be recognized using the same measuring device simply by carrying out additional measurements and expanding the signal processing.

[0025] Spindle Unit carrying out steps a) and b) without applying axial stress to the rotor head at the defined reference state, calculating the average value of the obtained position signals and storing the average value as a reference average value, and then Spindle Unit By performing steps a) and b) without applying axial stress to the rotor head in the current operating state, calculating the actual average value of the obtained position signal, and then subtracting the reference average value from the current average value, the axial displacement of the rotor head relative to the stator can be calculated, and then the axial displacement can be transmitted to the upper controller. Thus, in the form of the axial displacement of the rotor head, Spindle Unit Additional status information significant to the operation of the system can be recorded using the same measuring device, so that a reduction in the quality of the machining of the workpiece can be avoided simply by extending the signal processing.

[0026] Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0027] [Figure 1]FIG. 2 shows the front part of the spindle unit with the clamped tool carrier. [Diagram 2] FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of section A in FIG. [Diagram 3] FIG. 2 is an electrical block diagram of the device according to the present invention. [Figure 4] FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of section B in FIG. 2. [Diagram 5] FIG. 2 shows two measurement signals of a sensor in a device according to the invention. [Figure 6] 6 shows the measured signals of FIG. 5 for three different cases after low-pass filtering. [Figure 7] FIG. 7 shows the axial position of the rotor head calculated from the filtered measurement signal of FIG. 6. [Figure 8] 8 is a diagram showing the amount of axial deformation of the rotor head calculated from the positions in FIG. 7 and the stored reference signal. FIG. [Figure 9] FIG. 2 shows, in the form of a program sequence, the processing of a sensor signal according to the invention for detecting soiling. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0028] Figure 1 shows Spindle Unit 1 FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a front end of the Spindle Unit 1 The main components of the are a stator 2 and a rotor 3 arranged within the stator 2. A tool clamping device 4 is arranged within the rotor 3, by means of which a tool carrier 6 is clamped to a front end 5 of the rotor 3, hereinafter referred to as rotor head 5. Spindle Unit 1 Such a construction is recognized by experts and does not require further explanation here. The tool clamping device 4 has several collets 7 along its circumference which exert a uniformly distributed clamping force circumferentially on the tool carrier 6, which clamping force acts axially over a contact surface 8 against the rotor head 5.

[0029] In particular, the presence of chips on the contact surface 8 leads to irregularities in the distribution of the clamping force in the circumferential direction, and therefore to corresponding irregularities in the elastic deformation of the rotor head 5. These deformation irregularities in the rotor head 5 have both radial and axial components, the terms axial and radial being always used herein. Spindle Unit The axial component of such irregular deformations in the rotor head 5 is measured according to the present invention. The structure of the measuring device is described below with reference to FIG. 2, which shows the structure of the measuring device labeled A in FIG. Spindle Unit 1 1 shows an enlarged cross-section of the front end of the device.

[0030] As shown in FIG. 2, the measuring device on the rotor head 5 side consists of a series of grooves 9 circumferentially on the outer surface of the rotor head 5, separated from one another in the axial direction. Every two adjacent grooves 9 are separated from one another by a land 10 which also extends in the circumferential direction. All the grooves 9 have the same width. This also applies to the lands 10, so that a periodic arrangement of the grooves 9 and lands 10 is obtained in the axial direction. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, four grooves 9 and three lands 10 are provided. The grooves 9 and the lands 10 together define a measuring part 11 of the rotor head. It is essential that the measuring part 11 is located in an area in the rotor head 5 through which an axial flow of forces penetrates during the clamping of the tool or tool carrier 6, so that an elastic deformation of the measuring part 11 results in the axial direction from said clamping. With a correct tool clamping, this elastic deformation is approximately the same along the circumference of the rotor head 5, but in the case of contamination, it varies irregularly along the circumference of the rotor head 5.

[0031] The said measuring device on the stator 2 side is designed in the form of a chip on a printed circuit board 13 and comprises a magnetic field sensor 12 integrated in a cavity of the stator 2, which is diametrically opposite the measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5 and separated from the rotor head 5 only by a narrow radial gap. A permanent magnet 14 is arranged radially outside the circuit board 13, symmetrically with respect to the magnetic field sensor 12, so that the magnetic field of the permanent magnet 14 flows radially therein. The S pole of the permanent magnet 14 in the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 is located at its radially inner end and the N pole at its radially outer end. Thus, without a special shaping of the measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5, the magnetic field lines pass through the printed circuit board 13 and the sensor chip 12 approximately radially and at least symmetrically with respect to the common radial center axis M of the magnetic field sensor 12 and the permanent magnet 14.

[0032] Through the grooves 9 and lands 10 of the measuring part 11, the magnetic field of the permanent magnet 14 is distorted in the axial direction in the area of ​​the magnetic field sensor 12, but the distortion is uniform over the entire circumference of the rotor head 5 without deforming the rotor head 5, or is uniform over the entire circumference of the rotor head 5 while the rotor head 5 is deforming axially uniformly along the circumference of the rotor head 5. If the axial deformation of the rotor head 5 is non-uniform along the circumference of the rotor head 5, as in the case of the presence of chips on the contact surface 8 (FIG. 1) during the tightening of the tool or tool carrier 6, the distortion of the magnetic field through the measuring part 11 will be the same.

[0033] The material constituting the rotor head 5 has a high magnetic permeability, and is particularly suitable for the Spindle Unit 1 If the rotor head 5 is ferromagnetic, as can usually be assumed, the distortion of the magnetic field depends on the position of the groove 9. The groove 9 can be filled with a non-magnetic material, in particular with a plastic, to prevent contamination.

[0034] The axial distortion of the magnetic field passing through the measuring section 11 is measured according to the invention by means of a magnetic field sensor 12 with a strong direction-dependent detection sensitivity. The printed circuit board 13 with the magnetic field sensor 12 and the permanent magnet 14 is mounted in a housing 15 which in turn is mounted in a cavity 16 of the stator 2 and on its rear side is provided with signal processing electronics 17. A cable 18 (FIG. 1) starts from the signal processing electronics 17 and Spindle Unit 1 From Stator 2 of Spindle Unit 1 Therefore, no signal transmission from the rotor 3 to the stator 2 is required.

[0035] A known type of direction-dependent magnetic field sensor 12 is a magnetoresistive sensor whose electrical resistance value depends strongly on the direction of the magnetic field penetrating the sensor. Such magnetoresistive sensors are known per se and are commercially available, in particular in the form of four resistors connected in a bridge circuit, so that their output signal is proportional to the strength of the magnetic field in the sensitive direction of the magnetic field sensor 12. Two such bridge circuits of magnetic field-dependent resistors are typically provided together on a chip in a specific geometric arrangement, which will be explained below.

[0036] Figure 3 shows a part of the measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5, which has a period of length L consisting of a series of grooves 9 and lands 10. The magnetic field sensor 12 comprises two magnetoresistive bridge circuits whose respective resistors S1-S4 and C1-C4 are arranged nested in the direction of the position of the measuring part 11 to be measured, i.e. here in the axial direction of the rotor head 5, as shown diagrammatically in Figure 3, so that in said direction a resistor Sn of one bridge circuit is always followed by a corresponding resistor Cn of the other bridge circuit, and the two resistors of each bridge circuit are arranged one above the other.

[0037] The total length of the resistor arrangement in the direction of the position of the measuring part 11 to be measured and the period length L of the series of grooves 9 and lands 10 here coincide with each other, so that, during the displacement of the measuring part 11 by the period length L, one bridge circuit consisting of resistors S1-S4 generates one period of a sine wave output signal, while the other bridge circuit consisting of resistors C1-C4 generates one period with a phase shift of 90°, i.e. a cosine wave output signal. In this case, by applying the known arctangent 2 function, an output signal that is linearly dependent on the axial position of the measuring part 11 can be generated from the two bridge output signals within one period length L.

[0038] This concept of path measurement is known per se and does not require further explanation here. This path measurement is usually used to measure large displacement paths corresponding to multiples of the period length L or for gear speed measurement. However, this concept can also be used according to the invention to Spindle Unit 1 The measurement of the smallest deformations along the circumference of the rotor head 5 in the nanometer range represents a significant departure in objective from the previously known applications, which requires a different type of signal processing than the measurement of larger displacement paths or velocities, this special type of signal processing being described below.

[0039] A block diagram of a magnetic field sensor 12 with two bridge circuits on a chip is shown in figure 4 together with the signal processing electronics 17 according to the invention. Each bridge output signal is first amplified by an amplifier 19 and then converted by an analogue / digital converter 20 into digital signals 21 and 22, which are then sent to a digital signal processor 23. This digital signal processor 23 comprises a memory 24 in which reference signals, defined below, are stored, Spindle Unit 1 and a control unit 25 of the machine tool having the above components.

[0040] FIG. 5 shows the waveforms of the measured raw signals 21 and 22 over slightly more than one revolution. Spindle Unit 12 shows an example of the axial deformation of the rotor 3 as a function of the rotation angle of the rotor 3. It is clear that both signals 21 and 22 are very noisy, which is due to the presence of irregularities on the surface of the measured part 11 of the rotor head 5. These irregularities act in exactly the same way on both signals 21 and 22, as shown by the clearly visible similarity in the two signals 21 and 22. These raw signals 21 and 22 are again not proportional to the axial deformation of the measured part 11 of the rotor head 5. The first operation performed by the digital signal processor 23 is to low-pass filter the sensor signals 21 and 22, the variable now being the angle of rotation of the rotor 3 rather than time, i.e. with spatial filtering to suppress spatial noise.

[0041] FIG. 6 shows the waveforms of the low-pass filtered signals 21 and 22 over slightly more than one revolution. Spindle Unit 1 6 shows an example of the signal waveform as a function of the rotation angle of the rotor 3, where three different signal waveforms are shown, in other words as a solid line representing a waveform with an unhindered tool clamping, i.e. without any contamination on the contact surface 8, as a dashed line representing a waveform with small chips deposited on the contact surface 8 and as a dashed line representing a waveform with an average sized chip deposit on the contact surface 8. As is evident from FIG. 6, most of the noticeable noise has been removed by low-pass filtering and there are significant deviations in both signals between the waveforms of the three different cases, especially in the rotation angle range of about 220° to 320°.

[0042] Spindle Unit 1The waveforms of the position signals for the three aforementioned cases as a function of the angle of rotation of the rotor 3 are shown again in FIG. 7, which are then calculated in the digital signal processor 23 using the arctangent 2 function from the two signals of FIG. 6 low-pass filtered. The deviations already perceptible by the two individual signals of FIG. 6 between the three different cases are even clearer in the position signals of FIG. 6, and it is clear that the deviations are maximum in the range 220°-320°, although they are not limited only in this range. The scale of the ordinates in FIGS. 5 and 6 is again the digitized voltage values, whereas the unit of the ordinate in FIG. 7 is nanometers, since the absolute values ​​are here less significant than their change over one revolution of the rotor 3, i.e. over a rotation angle of 360°.

[0043] As is evident from Fig. 7, the position signal is periodic and has a similar waveform in all three cases, where the deviation from the waveform caused by debris adhering to the contact surface 8 during debris-free tool clamping depends on the size of the debris. In order to extract only this deviation as a signal, the average value of the position signal of Fig. 7 is first calculated over one revolution of the rotor 3 and then subtracted from the position signal of Fig. 7 to obtain a position change signal with a zero average value. A reference signal stored in memory 24 (Fig. 4) is then subtracted from this mean free position change signal. This is the signal obtained by subtracting the average value from the position signal shown as a solid line in Fig. 7, i.e. the mean free position change signal when debris-free tool clamping is performed.

[0044] The result of this calculation is shown in Figure 8. In the case of correct tool clamping, a baseline is logically obtained as the signal waveform, since the reference signal is subtracted from itself. In the presence of contamination, significant deviations from the baseline in the signal waveform are already obtained over one revolution of the rotor 3, even during the adhesion of small chips. The unit of the ordinate is also in nanometers in Figure 8, which means that even the smallest axial deformations can be recognized reliably and accurately.

[0045] 8, as the difference between the position change signal and the stored reference signal, it is essential that the signal to be analyzed is correctly synchronized with the stored reference signal, i.e. that pairs of values ​​of both signals, which are assigned exactly to the same angular position of the rotor 3, are subtracted from each other. This can be ensured, since starting from obtaining known approximations, which are assigned exactly pointwise to the two signals for the different displacements of the two signals compared to each other, their cross-correlation function is calculated and the assignment of the pair of values ​​for which said cross-correlation function has a maximum value is selected for the subtraction purpose.

[0046] An approximation of the exact point-by-point assignment of the two signals can be obtained, for example, by applying markings at certain locations on the circumference of the measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5 which generate characteristic pulses in the output signal of the magnetic field sensor 12. A simple type of such marking is a short length of groove 9 interruption, or a shorter length of groove 9 and axial offset of land 10. During one revolution of the rotor 5, both structures result in short sections of characteristic shape in both the signal to be analyzed and in the stored reference signal, which provide an approximation of the exact point-by-point assignment of the two signals.

[0047] If this marking has the shape of a precisely defined range of axial offset of the grooves 9 and lands 10, it can be used not only for approximate synchronization but also for automatic calibration of the position determination made between the currently recorded position signal and a stored reference signal, since it is in this case precisely known which axial position change of the rotor head 5 corresponds to the change in the sensor signal occurring on the offset side of the grooves 9 and lands 10.

[0048] The difference signal shown in Figure 8 then needs to be evaluated as to whether its deviation from the baseline is significant enough to indicate the presence of debris on the contact surface. A simple evaluation criterion is that the amount of difference signal at any value of the rotation angle exceeds a threshold. Another criterion that can be used is that the average value of the difference signal over one revolution exceeds a threshold. These criteria can also be combined with each other in the form of logical operations (e.g., AND, OR, etc.) to increase the reliability of error detection.

[0049] 9 shows in flow chart form a functional method according to the invention for processing the signals recorded by the magnetic field sensor 12 in a digital signal processor 23 in order to detect debris. When a measurement cycle is started, which can be initiated by a corresponding control signal of the control unit 25, in step 26 the two signals 21 and 22 of the magnetic field sensor 12 are Spindle Unit 1 The signals are recorded over one revolution of the rotor 3. The signals are spatially low pass filtered in step 27 and then in step 28 a single signal is calculated from the two phase shifted signals, indicative of the axial position of the measurement portion 11 of the rotor head 5. In step 29 the average value is subtracted from this position signal over one revolution of the rotor 3.

[0050] The mean free position change signal thus obtained is synchronized in step 30 by cross-correlation with a mean free reference signal stored in memory 24. The difference of these synchronized signals is calculated in step 31 by subtracting the reference signal. In step 32 the difference signal is evaluated for the presence of debris and in step 33 the result of said evaluation is communicated to the machine tool control 25.

[0051] If the presence of debris is signalled in step 33, the control 25 releases the tool or tool carrier 6 via the clamping device 4, removes it from the rotor head 5 by means of the tool changer and then automatically cleans the contact surface 8. If this is unsuccessful and debris is still detected after retightening of the tool or tool carrier 6, the intervention of the machine tool operator is called for by a corresponding error message. If no debris is detected during the operator's inspection, the uneven deformations occurring in the rotor head 5 indicate defects in the tool clamping device 4 in the form of wear or breakage of individual collets.

[0052] The step of calculating the reference signal, which is stored in memory 24, is also carried out by the device according to the invention, ensuring that no debris is present before clamping the tool or tool carrier 6, after which only steps 26 to 28 are carried out from the sequence according to figure 9. After step 28, the signal present at this position is stored in memory 24 as the reference signal.

[0053] Measurements at constant speed of the rotor 3 are in each case advantageously the simplest method. Such measurements can be carried out, for example, after a tool change. Spindle Unit 1 This can be done while the rotor 3 is approaching the processing position, which can be well below the normal operating speed. In principle, measurements can also be made while the rotor 3 is accelerating up to the operating speed, but this would lead to fluctuations in the allocation between time and rotation angle, which would lead to high signal processing costs.

[0054] If, as a result of carrying out the complete procedure, no significant unevenness in the deformation of the rotor head 5 is detected along the circumference of the rotor head 5, it can be assumed that no debris is present between the rotor head 5 and the tool or tool carrier 6.

[0055] On the other hand, the device according to the invention can also be used to determine whether the clamping force of the tool clamping device 4 is within the permissible range. For this purpose, the position measurement of the measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5 performed by the magnetic field sensor 12 during one revolution of the rotor 3 is performed during a tool change either in the released state of the tool clamping device 4 or in the clamped state of this device 4 in the absence of a tool or a tool carrier 6, i.e. when there is no axial deformation of the rotor head 5 due to the absence of force flow. The output signal of the magnetic field sensor 12 is then processed according to steps 26 to 28 of the procedure shown in FIG. 9. The average value of the position signal is then calculated in step 29, but is not subtracted from said position signal but is instead stored. After clamping of the tool or tool carrier 6, the usual position measurement of the measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5 is performed by the magnetic field sensor 12 during one revolution of the rotor 3, and also steps 26 to 28 of the signal processing are performed according to FIG. 9, and then the average value of the position signal is also calculated.

[0056] A difference between the average position values ​​is then calculated, which represents the average axial deformation to which the measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5 has been subjected by the clamping of the tool or tool carrier 6. This entire procedure is carried out first when starting up a new tool clamping device 4, and the difference between the average position values ​​obtained in this case before and after the clamping of the tool or tool carrier 6 is stored as a reference value for the axial deformation. During a tool change with the tool clamping device 4 in operation, this average position value is determined in the same way before and after the clamping of the tool or tool carrier 6 and is then subtracted from the stored reference value.

[0057] Assuming that the clamping force of the new tool clamping device 4 which generated the reference value of the axial deformation is correct, a suitable threshold value will determine whether the clamping force still has a sufficient value by comparing the differential deviation of the current average position value from the reference value. If the comparison indicates that the average axial deformation of the rotor head 5 during continuous operation is significantly less than the average axial deformation with the correct clamping force, and the deviation between the two exceeds the threshold value, then the clamping force should have decreased beyond an acceptable amount, indicating a defect or excessive wear in the tool clamping device 4.

[0058] The effect of the superposition on the position change of the measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5 as a result of deformation due to the clamping force of the tool clamping device 4 is Spindle Unit 1 As a result of the bearing heating, Spindle Unit 1 This is an axial forward displacement of the entire rotor 3, known as spindle expansion. This position change due to spindle expansion is not a deformation of the rotor head 5 but an axial displacement of the entire rotor 3. In the latter case, this plays no role in identifying debris, since the average values ​​of both the actual position signal and the reference signal are omitted and only the average free axial position change of the measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5 is evaluated during one revolution.

[0059] The spindle expansion is potentially significant for monitoring the clamping force of the tool clamping device 4, and the resulting position change of the measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5 has the same direction as the resulting smaller axial deformation caused by the reduced clamping force. However, since the spindle expansion is a relatively slow process, it can be assumed that the deviation of the rotor 3 caused by the expansion remains approximately constant during a tool change, which takes very little time on modern machine tools. Therefore, the measurement of the deformation of the measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5 as a result of the clamping force, which takes the form of a difference between the position where the clamping force is applied and the position where it is not applied, is not affected by distortions due to the spindle expansion.

[0060] On the other hand, during a tool change, either in the released state of the tool clamping device 4 or in the clamped state of the device without the presence of a tool or a tool carrier 6, only the spindle expansion can be recorded by the position measurement of the aforementioned measuring part 11 of the rotor head 5, performed by the magnetic field sensor 12, during one revolution of the rotor 3. For this purpose, a first measurement must be performed in cold state, i.e. at the start of the operation of the machine tool, and the measured value obtained therein is then stored as a reference value. During operation, during each tool change, either in the released state of the tool clamping device 4 or in the clamped state of the device without the presence of a tool or a tool carrier 6, a position measurement can be performed and the deviation of the position value from the reference value is then calculated. Since no deformation of the rotor head 5 is detected during these measurements, the revealed position changes can be attributed only to the spindle expansion.

[0061] Alternatively, if it can be assumed that the changes in the average position values ​​during operation are almost exclusively caused by spindle expansion, then said average position values ​​can also be recorded in the cold state, i.e. with the tool or tool carrier 6 clamped at the start of and during operation of the machine tool, since in practice the extent of spindle expansion is much greater than the extent of the axial deformation of the rotor head 5 caused by the clamping forces, and the latter also changes only very slowly and slightly during operation.

[0062] Thus, the measuring device according to the invention makes it possible, depending on the type of signal processing, not only to detect contamination of the contact surface between the rotor head 5 and the tool or tool carrier 6, but also to detect excessive wear or failure of the tool clamping device 4 and to record spindle expansion without the use of additional sensors.

Claims

1. A device for monitoring a spindle unit (1) provided for clamping and rotating a tool or a tool carrier (6), comprising: The present invention is characterized in that at least one magnet (14) is arranged on the stator (2) or rotor (3) of the spindle unit (1), the magnetic field of which penetrates a measuring portion (11) of the rotor head (5) across which an axial force flow crosses during clamping of a tool or a tool carrier (6) on the rotor head (5) by a tool clamping device (4) arranged on the rotor (3), the rotor head (5) having an axially varying magnetic permeability or magnetic susceptibility in its measuring portion (11), and at least one direction-dependent magnetic field sensor (12) is arranged on the stator (2) diametrically opposite the measuring portion (11) of the rotor head (5), and the magnetic field sensor (12) is connected to an evaluation device (17) configured to determine a measurement of the axial deformation of the rotor head (5) as a function of the rotation angle from the magnetic field intensity as a function of the rotation angle recorded by the magnetic field sensor (12) during one rotation of the rotor. A device for monitoring the spindle unit (1).

2. 2. The arrangement according to claim 1, characterized in that the evaluation device (17) is configured to determine a measurement of the axial position of the rotor head (5) relative to the stator (2) from the strength of the magnetic field as a function of the rotation angle recorded by the magnetic field sensor (12) during one revolution of the rotor.

3. 3. The device according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that magnets (14) arranged with radially oriented poles are arranged on a stator radially opposite the measuring part (11) of the rotor head (5), and that the measuring part (11) of the rotor head (5) has at least two grooves (9) on its surface which are axially separated from one another and extend in the circumferential direction.

4. 4. The device according to claim 3, characterized in that the groove (9) has, at least at one location in the circumferential direction of the measuring portion (11) of the rotor head (5), a marking extending in the circumferential direction for a predetermined length in the form of a single interruption or a predetermined degree of axial offset.

5. 3. The device according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that at least three of the magnets are arranged axially one after the other in the measuring part (11) of the rotor head (5) or at least three axially consecutive regions of the rotor head (5) are magnetized, in which case the magnetic poles are arranged radially and the arrangement of the radially aligned magnetic poles is in opposite directions for every two axially consecutive magnets or magnetized regions.

6. 6. The device according to claim 5, characterized in that the magnet or magnetized area arranged in the measuring portion (11) of the rotor head (5) has a marking extending a predetermined length in the circumferential direction at least at one place in the circumferential direction of the measuring portion (11) of the rotor head in the form of a break in magnetization or a predetermined degree of axial offset of the magnetization.

7. 3. The device according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic field sensor (12) is a magnetoresistive sensor having at least one bridge circuit of resistors, the value of each of which depends on the strength and direction of the magnetic field passing through it, and wherein the axial variation of the permeability or susceptibility of the measuring portion (11) of the rotor head (5) is periodic, and the axial geometric arrangement of the resistors is adapted to said axial variation, so that an axial displacement of the rotor head (5) relative to the stator (2) by one period length (L) of the axial variation results in a periodic waveform of the output signal of the bridge circuit as a function of the axial displacement of the rotor head (5) having the same period length (L).

8. 3. The device according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation device (17) comprises a memory (24) and a reference signal derived from at least one sensor signal recorded during one revolution of the rotor (3) together with a correctly tightened tool or tool carrier (6) is stored in the memory (24), and the evaluation device (17) is configured to determine the axial deformation of the rotor head (5) by the deviation between a signal derived from at least one sensor signal (21, 22) recorded during one revolution of the rotor (3) together with the tightened tool or tool carrier (6) and the stored reference signal.

9. 3. The device according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the evaluation device (17) is configured to derive a signal from the axial deformation of the rotor head (5) which indicates an incorrect clamping state of the tool or tool carrier (6).

10. 3. The device according to claim 1, wherein several direction-dependent magnetic field sensors (12) are arranged on the stator (2) radially opposite the measuring portion (11) of the rotor head (5), separated from one another in the circumferential direction of the stator (2) and each connected to the evaluation device (17).

11. 2. A method for monitoring a spindle unit (1) provided for clamping and rotating a tool or a tool carrier (6) by means of a device according to claim 1, said method comprising the steps of: a) recording at least one signal (21, 22) derived from at least one signal generated by a magnetic field sensor (12) during one revolution of the rotor (3) of said spindle unit (1) with a tool or a tool carrier (6) clamped thereon; b) calculating from the recorded signals (21, 22) a position signal indicative of the axial position of a measuring part (11) of the rotor head (5) diametrically opposite the magnetic field sensor (12) as a function of the rotation angle of the rotor (3) during one revolution of the rotor; c) calculating a difference signal from the calculated position signal and a reference signal stored in a memory (24) as a function of the rotation angle of the rotor (3) during one revolution of the rotor; d) determining at least one magnitude of the axial deformation of the rotor head (5) from the calculated difference signal; e) comparing the magnitude of the determined axial deformation of the rotor head (5) with a limit value and issuing a status signal, as a function of the result of the comparison, indicating that the tightened tool or tool carrier (6) is in an incorrect tightening state. method.

12. 12. The method according to claim 11, characterized in that the reference signal is determined using steps a) and b) during correct tightening of the equivalent tool or tool carrier (6) and then stored in the memory (24).

13. 13. The method according to claim 11 or 12, characterized in that during step c), corresponding average values ​​of the position signal and the reference signal are calculated, said average values ​​being first subtracted from each of the two signals, and in that the mean free reference signal is subtracted from the mean free position signal to calculate the difference signal, and in that the status signal indicates the presence or absence of debris between the clamped tool or tool carrier (6) and the surface (8) of the rotor head (5).

14. 13. The method according to claim 11 or 12, characterized in that during the step of determining the reference signal, steps a) and b) are performed in a first run without applying axial stress to the rotor head (5) and then steps a) and b) are performed in a second run with an equivalent tool or tool carrier (6) that has been correctly clamped, characterized in that the reference signal is calculated by subtracting the position signals acquired during the first run from the position signals acquired during the second run, characterized in that during the execution of step c), corresponding average values ​​of the position signals and the reference signal are calculated, characterized in that the average value of the reference signals is subtracted from the average value of the position signals to calculate the difference signal, characterized in that the status signal indicates that the clamping force output by the tool clamping device (4) was insufficient.

15. A method according to claim 11 or 12, characterized in that steps a) and b) are performed without applying axial stress to the rotor head (5) in a defined reference state of the spindle unit (1), an average value of the obtained position signals is calculated and stored as a reference average value, and then steps a) and b) are performed without applying axial stress to the rotor head (5) in a current operating state of the spindle unit (1), a current average value of the obtained position signals is calculated, and then the axial displacement amount of the rotor head (5) relative to the stator (2) is calculated by subtracting the reference average value from the current average value, and then the axial displacement amount is transmitted to a higher-level control unit (24).

Images