Instrument state determination method and apparatus, computer device, and storage medium

Abstract

The present application discloses an instrument state determination method and apparatus, a computer device, and a storage medium. The method can be applied to the technical field of computers, and specifically may comprise: when a self-quality-control reagent has been provided in a target instrument, using the self-quality-control reagent to perform self-quality-control detection on the target instrument to obtain a target detection result of the self-quality-control detection; and determining the state of the target instrument on the basis of the target detection result of the self-quality control detection. The scheme can improve the accuracy and reliability of the determined instrument state.

Description

Instrument status determination method, device, computer equipment and storage medium Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of computer technology, and in particular to a method, apparatus, computer device, and storage medium for determining an instrument status. Background Art

[0002] In vitro diagnostic analytical instruments are used to detect and evaluate biological samples to help users diagnose diseases, monitor treatment progress, and provide health management advice.

[0003] Traditional in vitro diagnostic instruments rely on tedious manual quality control procedures with accompanying test reagents to determine instrument status. This is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. Furthermore, human error can easily lead to low accuracy and reliability in the determined instrument status.

[0004] Summary of the Invention

[0005] Based on this, it is necessary to provide an instrument status determination method, apparatus, computer equipment and storage medium that can improve the accuracy and reliability of the determined instrument status in order to address the above technical problems.

[0006] In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for determining an instrument state, the method comprising:

[0007] When a self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, the self-quality control reagent is used to perform a self-quality control test on the target instrument to obtain a target test result of the self-quality control test;

[0008] Determine the status of the target instrument based on the target test results of the self-quality control test.

[0009] In one embodiment, determining the status of the target instrument based on the test results of the self-quality control test includes:

[0010] When the target test result of the self-quality control test complies with the Westgard rule, the status of the target instrument is determined to be normal;

[0011] When the target detection result of the self-quality control detection does not comply with the Westgard rule, the state of the target instrument is determined to be abnormal.

[0012] In one embodiment, the method further comprises:

[0013] When the test results of the self-quality control test do not comply with the Westgard rule, the average of multiple historical test results of the self-quality control test is obtained;

[0014] Comparing the target detection results of the self-quality control detection with the mean value to obtain multiple comparison results;

[0015] Output a target anomaly label based on multiple comparison results.

[0016] In one embodiment, outputting a target abnormality mark based on multiple comparison results includes:

[0017] Obtain multiple deviation ranges; multiple deviation ranges are determined based on standard deviations of the mean;

[0018] According to the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and the preset corresponding relationship, the target abnormality mark is output; the preset corresponding relationship is the corresponding relationship between the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and the candidate abnormality mark.

[0019] In one embodiment, the candidate abnormality marks include a warning mark and an out-of-control mark. According to the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and a preset corresponding relationship, the target abnormality mark is output, including:

[0020] When the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is less than a preset number threshold, a warning mark is output; wherein μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation;

[0021] When the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is greater than or equal to a preset number threshold, an out-of-control flag is output.

[0022] In one embodiment, a self-quality control test is performed on a target instrument using a self-quality control reagent to obtain a target test result of the self-quality control test, including:

[0023] Using self-quality control reagents, a preset method is used to perform self-quality control detection on the target instrument to obtain the target detection result of the self-quality control detection; the preset method is one of the competitive method, the sandwich method, and the indirect method, preferably the competitive method.

[0024] In a second aspect, the present application further provides an apparatus for determining an instrument state, the apparatus comprising:

[0025] The detection module is used to perform self-quality control detection on the target instrument using the self-quality control reagent when the self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, and obtain the target detection result of the self-quality control detection;

[0026] The determination module is used to determine the status of the target instrument based on the target detection result of the self-quality control detection.

[0027] In a third aspect, the present application further provides a computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor implements the steps of the above-mentioned instrument status determination method when executing the computer program.

[0028] In a fourth aspect, the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which implements the steps of the above-mentioned instrument status determination method when executed by a processor.

[0029] In a fifth aspect, the present application also provides a computer program product, which includes a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the steps of the above-mentioned instrument status determination method.

[0030] The above-mentioned instrument status determination method, device, computer equipment and storage medium, by using the self-quality control reagent to perform self-quality control detection on the target instrument when the self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, obtain the target detection result of the self-quality control detection, and then determine the status of the target instrument based on the target detection result of the self-quality control detection. Compared with the in vitro diagnostic analysis instrument in the prior art that relies on cumbersome manual quality control procedures to determine the status of the instrument, resulting in higher cost and lower reliability of the determined instrument status, the instrument status determination method of the present application, by installing the self-quality control reagent on the instrument, automatically performs self-quality control detection on the target instrument, and the entire process is automatically executed by a computer, so that the accuracy and reliability of the instrument status finally determined are greatly improved. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0031] FIG1 is a schematic flow chart of a method for determining an instrument state in one embodiment;

[0032] FIG2 is a schematic diagram of a process for outputting a target abnormality mark in one embodiment;

[0033] FIG3 is a schematic diagram of another process of outputting a target abnormality mark in one embodiment;

[0034] FIG4 is a schematic flow chart of a method for determining an instrument status in another embodiment;

[0035] FIG5 is a block diagram of a device for determining an instrument state according to an embodiment;

[0036] FIG6 is a diagram showing the internal structure of a computer device in one embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0037] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of this application more clear, the following further describes this application in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain this application and are not intended to limit this application.

[0038] Traditional in vitro diagnostic analytical instruments rely on tedious manual quality control procedures with matching test item reagents to determine instrument status, which is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. Furthermore, human error can easily occur, resulting in low accuracy and reliability in the determined instrument status. Therefore, embodiments of the present application provide a method for determining instrument status to address these technical issues.

[0039] In one embodiment, FIG1 is a flow chart of a method for determining an instrument status according to an embodiment of the present application, and is described using the method applied to a server as an example. The method includes the following steps:

[0040] S101 , when a self-quality control reagent has been installed in a target instrument, a self-quality control test is performed on the target instrument using the self-quality control reagent to obtain a target test result of the self-quality control test.

[0041] Optionally, the target instrument may be an instrument that is to perform self-quality control testing. The self-quality control reagent may be a reagent installed on the target instrument to control the target instrument to automatically perform self-quality control testing. It should be noted that existing instruments are not capable of installing self-quality control reagents and, therefore, are not capable of automatically performing self-quality control testing. Existing instruments can only install quality control reagents that are not capable of automatically performing self-quality control testing.

[0042] Optionally, self-quality control is a function that should be implemented for proper control. It is mainly used to detect and control the precision of routine instruments in this laboratory and detect changes in their accuracy to improve the detection accuracy and reliability of routine instruments in this laboratory.

[0043] Specifically, after the self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, the self-quality control reagent is used to control the target instrument to automatically perform self-quality control testing to obtain a target test result of the self-quality control testing.

[0044] S102, determining the status of the target instrument according to the target detection result of the self-quality control detection.

[0045] Optionally, there is a pre-set correspondence between the target detection result of the self-quality control test and the status of the target instrument. After determining the target detection result of the self-quality control test, the status of the target instrument can be quickly and accurately obtained according to the pre-set correspondence, so that abnormal conditions of the instrument can be quickly discovered and corresponding troubleshooting operations can be performed in time to improve laboratory efficiency.

[0046] In the above-mentioned instrument status determination method, when the self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, the self-quality control reagent is used to perform a self-quality control test on the target instrument to obtain the target detection result of the self-quality control test, and then the status of the target instrument is determined based on the target detection result of the self-quality control test. Compared with the in vitro diagnostic analysis instruments in the prior art that rely on cumbersome manual quality control procedures to determine the status of the instrument, resulting in low accuracy and reliability of the determined instrument status, the instrument status determination method of the present application automatically performs a self-quality control test on the target instrument by installing a self-quality control reagent on the instrument. The entire process is automatically executed by a computer, which greatly improves the accuracy and reliability of the instrument status finally determined.

[0047] Based on the above embodiment, whether the status of the target instrument is normal can be determined by judging whether the target detection result of the self-quality control detection complies with the Westgard rule.

[0048] Alternatively, the Westgard rule is a quality control rule used for quality control that helps laboratories detect and assess errors and variability in analytical processes. The Westgard rule determines whether test results are within acceptable limits by setting a series of control limits for laboratory tests.

[0049] If the target detection result of the self-quality control test complies with the Westgard rule, the state of the target instrument is determined to be normal. Optionally, if the target detection result of the self-quality control test complies with the Westgard rule, it indicates that the error of the target detection result is small or almost negligible, in which case the state of the target instrument is determined to be normal.

[0050] If the target detection result of the self-quality control test does not comply with the Westgard rule, the state of the target instrument is determined to be abnormal. Optionally, if the target detection result of the self-quality control test does not comply with the Westgard rule, it indicates that the error of the target detection result is large. In this case, the state of the target instrument is determined to be abnormal.

[0051] Optionally, when the test results of the self-quality control test do not follow the Westgard rule, multiple historical test results of the self-quality control test can be obtained, and corresponding target abnormality marks can be output based on the multiple historical test results. One way is to obtain the mean of multiple historical test results of the self-quality control test; compare the target test result of the self-quality control test with the mean to obtain multiple comparison results; and output the target abnormality mark based on the multiple comparison results. Another way is to obtain the mean square value of multiple historical test results of the self-quality control test, compare the target test result of the self-quality control test with the mean square value to obtain multiple comparison results; and output the target abnormality mark based on the multiple comparison results.

[0052] It can be understood that in this embodiment, the Westgard rule is used to determine whether the state of the target instrument is normal. The solution is simple and easy to operate, and lays a foundation for determining the abnormal state type of the target instrument.

[0053] Based on the above embodiment, the steps of outputting target abnormality marks are decomposed and refined through Figure 2. Optionally, as shown in Figure 2, the following implementation process is included:

[0054] S201, obtaining multiple deviation ranges.

[0055] Optionally, the multiple deviation ranges are determined based on the standard deviation of the mean. Typically, the deviation range is a range represented by positive and negative multiples of the standard deviation of the mean. For example, if the standard deviation is σ and the multiple is 2, the deviation range is -2σ to +2σ.

[0056] S202: Output a target abnormality mark according to the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and a preset corresponding relationship.

[0057] Optionally, the preset corresponding relationship is a corresponding relationship between the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and the candidate abnormality markers.

[0058] Optionally, the number of comparison results outside each deviation range is counted, and combined with a preset correspondence, the abnormal state type of the target instrument is determined, and the corresponding target abnormality mark is output. For example, if the preset correspondence is: when one test result falls outside +2σ or -2σ of the mean, a warning mark is output; when two consecutive test results fall outside +2σ or -2σ of the mean, an out-of-control mark is output. Based on the target test results of the self-quality control test, combined with the statistical number of comparison results outside each deviation range and the above-mentioned preset correspondence, the corresponding target abnormality mark can be output.

[0059] It can be understood that in this embodiment, the type of target abnormality mark to be output is determined based on the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and the preset corresponding relationship. The entire process is automatically executed by a computer, so that the accuracy and reliability of the type of target abnormality mark finally determined are greatly improved.

[0060] Based on the above embodiment, the steps of outputting the target abnormality mark are further decomposed and refined through Figure 3. Optionally, the candidate abnormality marks include warning marks and out-of-control marks, as shown in Figure 3, including the following implementation process:

[0061] S301 : When the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ−2σ, μ+2σ) is less than a preset number threshold, output a warning mark.

[0062] Where μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation.

[0063] Optionally, if it is outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ), it indicates that the error of the target detection result is large. At this time, the state of the target instrument is determined to be abnormal. When the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is less than the preset number threshold, it indicates that the number of target detection results with large errors is small. At this time, a warning mark is output.

[0064] S302 : When the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ−2σ, μ+2σ) is greater than or equal to a preset number threshold, output an out-of-control flag.

[0065] Optionally, when the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is greater than or equal to a preset number threshold, it indicates that the number of target detection results with large errors is large, and an out-of-control flag is output.

[0066] It should be noted that for the deviation range, a larger deviation range, such as (μ-3σ, μ+3σ) and (μ-4σ, μ+4σ), indicates a larger allowable error; a smaller deviation range, such as (μ-σ, μ+σ), indicates a smaller allowable error. The deviation range and preset number threshold can be adjusted according to accuracy requirements to obtain different anomaly label classification situations.

[0067] It can be understood that this embodiment provides a method for determining the type of abnormal marker, which is simple, easy to implement and highly flexible.

[0068] On the basis of the above embodiments, in the process of using self-quality control reagents to perform self-quality control testing on the target instrument and obtaining the target detection results of the self-quality control testing, it is necessary to select a detection method, that is, using self-quality control reagents, a preset method is used to perform self-quality control testing on the target instrument to obtain the target detection results of the self-quality control testing; the preset method is one of the competitive method, the sandwich method, and the indirect method, preferably, the competitive method.

[0069] Competition assays are methods used to determine the concentration of a specific antigen or antibody in a sample. These methods rely on competitive binding between an antigen and a marker (e.g., an antibody labeled with a radioisotope or enzyme). The antigen or antibody in the sample competes for binding with the marker, affecting the extent of marker binding. By measuring the reduction in marker binding, the concentration of the target antigen or antibody in the sample can be inferred.

[0070] The indirect method is a commonly used immunoassay. It is used to detect and measure the presence and concentration of specific antibodies in a sample. This method relies on the specific binding of a specific antibody to the antigen being tested. First, the test antigen binds to a known antibody to form a complex. Then, a secondary antibody (usually an anti-animal antibody labeled with a fluorescent agent or enzyme) is introduced that binds to the known antibody. By detecting the signal from the secondary antibody, the presence and concentration of the specific antibody in the sample can be determined.

[0071] The sandwich assay is a method used to detect and measure the presence and concentration of a specific antigen in a sample. This method relies on two specific antibodies that simultaneously bind to a specific antigen in a sandwich configuration. First, a specific antibody is coated onto a test plate and allowed to bind to the antigen to be detected. Then, a second specific antibody is introduced, which binds to a different epitope of the antigen to be detected and reacts with a substrate to produce a detectable signal. By measuring the intensity of the signal, the presence and concentration of the specific antigen in the sample can be determined.

[0072] In one embodiment, FIG4 shows a flow chart of a method for determining an instrument status in another embodiment. In conjunction with FIG4 , each stage specifically includes the following implementation process:

[0073] S401, when a self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, the self-quality control reagent is used to perform a self-quality control test on the target instrument using a preset method to obtain a target test result of the self-quality control test.

[0074] Optionally, the preset method is one of the competitive method, the sandwich method, and the indirect method, preferably the competitive method.

[0075] S402 , when the target detection result of the self-quality control detection complies with the Westgard rule, determining that the state of the target instrument is normal; when the target detection result of the self-quality control detection does not comply with the Westgard rule, determining that the state of the target instrument is abnormal.

[0076] S403 : When the test result of the self-quality control test does not comply with the Westgard rule, obtain an average of multiple historical test results of the self-quality control test.

[0077] S404: Compare the target detection result of the self-quality control detection with the mean value to obtain multiple comparison results.

[0078] S405: Acquire multiple deviation ranges.

[0079] Optionally, the plurality of deviation ranges are determined based on standard deviations from the mean.

[0080] S406, when the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is less than the preset number threshold, output a warning mark; wherein μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation; when the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is greater than or equal to the preset number threshold, output an out-of-control mark.

[0081] Optionally, the preset corresponding relationship is a corresponding relationship between the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and the candidate abnormality markers.

[0082] The specific process of the above S401-S406 can be found in the description of the above method embodiment. The implementation principles and technical effects are similar and will not be repeated here.

[0083] It should be understood that, although the various steps in the flowcharts involved in the various embodiments described above are displayed in sequence according to the instructions of the arrows, these steps are not necessarily executed in sequence in the order indicated by the arrows. Unless otherwise specified herein, there is no strict order restriction on the execution of these steps, and these steps can be executed in other orders. Moreover, at least a portion of the steps in the flowcharts involved in the various embodiments described above can include multiple steps or multiple stages, and these steps or stages are not necessarily executed and completed at the same time, but can be executed at different times, and the execution order of these steps or stages is not necessarily to be carried out in sequence, but can be executed in turn or alternately with other steps or at least a portion of steps or stages in other steps.

[0084] Based on the same inventive concept, embodiments of the present application also provide an apparatus for determining an instrument state for implementing the aforementioned method for determining an instrument state. The solution provided by this apparatus is similar to the solution described in the aforementioned method. Therefore, the specific limitations of one or more embodiments of the apparatus for determining an instrument state provided below can be found in the aforementioned limitations of the method for determining an instrument state, and will not be further elaborated here.

[0085] In one embodiment, a structural block diagram of an apparatus for determining an instrument state in one embodiment is shown in FIG5 . As shown in FIG5 , an apparatus for determining an instrument state 5 is provided, and the apparatus 5 includes: a detection module 50 and a determination module 51 , wherein:

[0086] The detection module 50 is used to perform a self-quality control test on the target instrument using the self-quality control reagent when the self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, and obtain a target detection result of the self-quality control test;

[0087] The determination module 51 is used to determine the status of the target instrument according to the target detection result of the self-quality control detection.

[0088] The above-mentioned device for determining the state of the instrument, by using the self-quality control reagent to perform self-quality control detection on the target instrument when the self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, obtains the target detection result of the self-quality control detection, and then determines the state of the target instrument according to the target detection result of the self-quality control detection. Compared with the in vitro diagnostic analysis instrument in the prior art that relies on cumbersome manual quality control procedures to determine the state of the instrument, resulting in low accuracy and reliability of the determined instrument state, the device for determining the state of the instrument of the present application automatically performs self-quality control detection on the target instrument by installing the self-quality control reagent on the instrument. The entire process is automatically executed by a computer, so that the accuracy and reliability of the instrument state finally determined are greatly improved.

[0089] In one embodiment, the determination module 51 is specifically configured to:

[0090] When the target detection result of the self-quality control detection complies with the Westgard rule, the state of the target instrument is determined to be normal; when the target detection result of the self-quality control detection does not comply with the Westgard rule, the state of the target instrument is determined to be abnormal.

[0091] In one embodiment, the device 5 further comprises:

[0092] An acquisition module, used for acquiring an average of multiple historical test results of the self-quality control test when the test result of the self-quality control test does not comply with the Westgard rule;

[0093] A comparison module is used to compare the target detection results of the self-quality control detection with the mean value to obtain multiple comparison results;

[0094] The output module is used to output a target abnormality mark according to multiple comparison results.

[0095] In one embodiment, the output module specifically includes:

[0096] an acquiring unit, configured to acquire a plurality of deviation ranges; the plurality of deviation ranges are determined based on a standard deviation of a mean;

[0097] The output unit is used to output a target abnormality mark according to the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and a preset corresponding relationship; the preset corresponding relationship is the corresponding relationship between the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and the candidate abnormality mark.

[0098] In one embodiment, the output unit is specifically configured to:

[0099] When the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is less than the preset number threshold, a warning mark is output; where μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation; when the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is greater than or equal to the preset number threshold, an out-of-control mark is output.

[0100] In one embodiment, the determination module 51 is specifically configured to:

[0101] Using self-quality control reagents, a preset method is used to perform self-quality control detection on the target instrument to obtain the target detection result of the self-quality control detection; the preset method is one of the competitive method, the sandwich method, and the indirect method, preferably the competitive method.

[0102] Each module in the above-mentioned apparatus for determining the instrument status may be implemented in whole or in part through software, hardware, or a combination thereof. Each module may be embedded in or independent of a processor in a computer device in the form of hardware, or may be stored in a memory in the computer device in the form of software, so that the processor can call and execute the corresponding operations of each module.

[0103] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, which may be a server, and its internal structure diagram may be as shown in Figure 6. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a network interface, and a transceiver connected via a system bus. The processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The transceiver of the computer device is used to perform operations of receiving or sending data under the control of the processor. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program, and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The database of the computer device is used to store data such as sample data. The network interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal via a network connection. When the computer program is executed by the processor, an instrument status determination method is implemented.

[0104] Those skilled in the art will understand that the structure shown in Figure 6 is merely a block diagram of a portion of the structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of the present application is applied. Specifically, the computer device may include more or fewer components than shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different component arrangement.

[0105] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are implemented:

[0106] When a self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, the self-quality control reagent is used to perform a self-quality control test on the target instrument to obtain a target test result of the self-quality control test;

[0107] Determine the status of the target instrument based on the target test results of the self-quality control test.

[0108] In one embodiment, when a processor executes logic in a computer program for determining a state of a target instrument based on a test result of a self-quality control test, the processor specifically implements the following steps:

[0109] When the target detection result of the self-quality control detection complies with the Westgard rule, the state of the target instrument is determined to be normal; when the target detection result of the self-quality control detection does not comply with the Westgard rule, the state of the target instrument is determined to be abnormal.

[0110] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the logic in the computer program, it further specifically implements the following steps:

[0111] When the test results of the self-quality control test do not follow the Westgard rule, the average of multiple historical test results of the self-quality control test is obtained; the target test result of the self-quality control test is compared with the average to obtain multiple comparison results; and the target abnormality mark is output according to the multiple comparison results.

[0112] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the logic in the computer program that outputs a target abnormality flag based on multiple comparison results, the processor further specifically implements the following steps:

[0113] Acquire multiple deviation ranges; the multiple deviation ranges are determined based on the standard deviation of the mean; output a target anomaly marker based on the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and a preset correspondence; the preset correspondence is the correspondence between the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and the candidate anomaly marker.

[0114] In one embodiment, the candidate anomaly flags include a warning flag and an out-of-control flag. When the processor executes the logic in the computer program that outputs the target anomaly flag based on the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and a preset correspondence, the processor further specifically implements the following steps:

[0115] When the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is less than the preset number threshold, a warning mark is output; where μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation; when the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is greater than or equal to the preset number threshold, an out-of-control mark is output.

[0116] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the logic in the computer program for performing self-quality control testing on a target instrument using a self-quality control reagent to obtain a target detection result of the self-quality control testing, the processor further specifically implements the following:

[0117] Using self-quality control reagents, a preset method is used to perform self-quality control detection on the target instrument to obtain the target detection result of the self-quality control detection; the preset method is one of the competitive method, the sandwich method, and the indirect method, preferably the competitive method.

[0118] The principles and specific processes of implementing the computer device provided above in each embodiment can be found in the description of the instrument status determination method embodiment in the aforementioned embodiment, and will not be repeated here.

[0119] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are performed:

[0120] When a self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, the self-quality control reagent is used to perform a self-quality control test on the target instrument to obtain a target test result of the self-quality control test;

[0121] Determine the status of the target instrument based on the target test results of the self-quality control test.

[0122] In one embodiment, when the logic in the computer program for determining the status of the target instrument based on the test results of the self-quality control test is executed by the processor, the following steps are specifically implemented:

[0123] When the target detection result of the self-quality control detection complies with the Westgard rule, the state of the target instrument is determined to be normal; when the target detection result of the self-quality control detection does not comply with the Westgard rule, the state of the target instrument is determined to be abnormal.

[0124] In one embodiment, when the logic in the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further specifically implemented:

[0125] When the test results of the self-quality control test do not follow the Westgard rule, the average of multiple historical test results of the self-quality control test is obtained; the target test result of the self-quality control test is compared with the average to obtain multiple comparison results; and the target abnormality mark is output according to the multiple comparison results.

[0126] In one embodiment, when the logic of outputting a target abnormality flag based on multiple comparison results in the computer program is executed by the processor, the following steps are further specifically implemented:

[0127] Acquire multiple deviation ranges; the multiple deviation ranges are determined based on the standard deviation of the mean; output a target anomaly marker based on the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and a preset correspondence; the preset correspondence is the correspondence between the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and the candidate anomaly marker.

[0128] In one embodiment, the candidate abnormality flags include a warning flag and an out-of-control flag. When the logic of the computer program for outputting a target abnormality flag based on the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and a preset correspondence is executed by the processor, the following steps are specifically implemented:

[0129] When the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is less than the preset number threshold, a warning mark is output; where μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation; when the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is greater than or equal to the preset number threshold, an out-of-control mark is output.

[0130] In one embodiment, when the logic of the computer program for performing self-quality control testing on a target instrument using a self-quality control reagent to obtain a target detection result of the self-quality control testing is executed by a processor, the following steps are specifically implemented:

[0131] Using self-quality control reagents, a preset method is used to perform self-quality control detection on the target instrument to obtain the target detection result of the self-quality control detection; the preset method is one of the competitive method, the sandwich method, and the indirect method, preferably the competitive method.

[0132] The principles and specific processes of the computer-readable storage medium provided above in implementing each embodiment can be found in the description of the target detection method embodiment in the aforementioned embodiment, and will not be repeated here.

[0133] In one embodiment, a computer program product is provided, comprising a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the following steps:

[0134] When a self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, the self-quality control reagent is used to perform a self-quality control test on the target instrument to obtain a target test result of the self-quality control test;

[0135] Determine the status of the target instrument based on the target test results of the self-quality control test.

[0136] In one embodiment, when the logic in the computer program for determining the status of the target instrument based on the test results of the self-quality control test is executed by the processor, the following steps are specifically implemented:

[0137] When the target detection result of the self-quality control detection complies with the Westgard rule, the state of the target instrument is determined to be normal; when the target detection result of the self-quality control detection does not comply with the Westgard rule, the state of the target instrument is determined to be abnormal.

[0138] In one embodiment, when the logic in the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further specifically implemented:

[0139] When the test results of the self-quality control test do not follow the Westgard rule, the average of multiple historical test results of the self-quality control test is obtained; the target test result of the self-quality control test is compared with the average to obtain multiple comparison results; and the target abnormality mark is output according to the multiple comparison results.

[0140] In one embodiment, when the logic of outputting a target abnormality flag based on multiple comparison results in the computer program is executed by the processor, the following steps are further specifically implemented:

[0141] Acquire multiple deviation ranges; the multiple deviation ranges are determined based on the standard deviation of the mean; output a target anomaly marker based on the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and a preset correspondence; the preset correspondence is the correspondence between the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and the candidate anomaly marker.

[0142] In one embodiment, the candidate abnormality flags include a warning flag and an out-of-control flag. When the logic of the computer program for outputting a target abnormality flag based on the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and a preset correspondence is executed by the processor, the following steps are specifically implemented:

[0143] When the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is less than the preset number threshold, a warning mark is output; where μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation; when the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is greater than or equal to the preset number threshold, an out-of-control mark is output.

[0144] In one embodiment, when the logic of the computer program for performing self-quality control testing on a target instrument using a self-quality control reagent to obtain a target detection result of the self-quality control testing is executed by a processor, the following steps are specifically implemented:

[0145] Using self-quality control reagents, a preset method is used to perform self-quality control detection on the target instrument to obtain the target detection result of the self-quality control detection; the preset method is one of the competitive method, the sandwich method, and the indirect method, preferably the competitive method.

[0146] The principles and specific processes of the computer program products provided above in implementing each embodiment can be found in the description of the target detection method embodiment in the aforementioned embodiment, and will not be repeated here.

[0147] It should be noted that the information involved in this application (including but not limited to the target detection results in the instrument status determination method in this application, the status information of the target instrument, etc.) is information that has been fully authorized by all parties.

[0148] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment methods can be implemented by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to memory, database or other media used in the embodiments provided in this application may include at least one of non-volatile and volatile memory. Non-volatile memory may include read-only memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash memory, optical memory, high-density embedded non-volatile memory, resistive random access memory (ReRAM), magnetic random access memory (MRAM), ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM), phase change memory (PCM), graphene memory, etc. Volatile memory may include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory, etc. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM can be in various forms, such as static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM). The database involved in the various embodiments provided herein may include at least one of a relational database and a non-relational database. Non-relational databases may include, but are not limited to, distributed databases based on blockchains. The processor involved in the various embodiments provided herein may be, but are not limited to, a general-purpose processor, a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit, a digital signal processor, a programmable logic unit, a data processing logic unit based on quantum computing, and the like.

[0149] The technical features of the above embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. To make the description concise, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this specification.

[0150] The above-described embodiments merely represent several implementation methods of the present application. While the descriptions are relatively specific and detailed, they should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present application. It should be noted that a person of ordinary skill in the art may make various modifications and improvements without departing from the spirit of the present application, and these modifications and improvements fall within the scope of protection of the present application. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present application shall be determined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for determining an instrument state, characterized in that: The method comprises: In the case where a self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, using the self-quality control reagent to perform a self-quality control test on the target instrument to obtain a target test result of the self-quality control test; The state of the target instrument is determined according to the target detection result of the self-quality control detection.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Determining the state of the target instrument according to the test result of the self-quality control test includes: In the case where the target detection result of the self-quality control detection complies with the Westgard rule, determining that the state of the target instrument is normal; When the target detection result of the self-quality control detection does not comply with the Westgard rule, it is determined that the state of the target instrument is abnormal.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The method further comprises: When the test result of the self-quality control test does not comply with the Westgard rule, obtaining an average of multiple historical test results of the self-quality control test; Comparing the target detection result of the self-quality control detection with the mean value to obtain multiple comparison results; A target abnormality flag is output according to the plurality of comparison results.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that Outputting a target abnormality mark according to the plurality of comparison results includes: Acquire multiple deviation ranges; the multiple deviation ranges are determined according to the standard deviation of the mean; According to the number of comparison results outside each of the deviation ranges and a preset corresponding relationship, a target abnormality mark is output; the preset corresponding relationship is the corresponding relationship between the number of comparison results outside each of the deviation ranges and the candidate abnormality marks.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that The candidate abnormality marks include warning marks and out-of-control marks, and the target abnormality mark is output according to the number of comparison results outside each deviation range and the preset corresponding relationship, including: When the number of comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is less than the preset number threshold, the warning mark is output; wherein μ is the mean value, σ is the standard deviation; When the number of the comparison results outside the deviation range (μ-2σ, μ+2σ) is greater than or equal to the preset number threshold, the out-of-control flag is output.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The using the self-quality control reagent to perform self-quality control detection on the target instrument to obtain the target detection result of the self-quality control detection includes: The self-quality control reagent is used to perform self-quality control detection on the target instrument using a preset method to obtain the target detection result of the self-quality control detection; the preset method is one of the competitive method, the sandwich method, and the indirect method.

7. An apparatus for determining an instrument state, characterized in that: The device comprises: A detection module, used to perform a self-quality control test on the target instrument using the self-quality control reagent when the self-quality control reagent has been installed in the target instrument, so as to obtain a target detection result of the self-quality control test; A determination module is used to determine the state of the target instrument according to the target detection result of the self-quality control detection.

8. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, wherein: When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

10. A computer program product, comprising a computer program, characterized in that When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

Images