Pipeline strength determination method and apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium

Abstract

Provided is a pipeline strength determination method, comprising: acquiring a measurement beam of an ultrasonic flaw detection device for a target pipeline and measurement parameters of the target pipeline; comparing the measurement beam with a comparison beam sample, and, on the basis of the comparison result, determining a pipeline damage level of the target pipeline; and on the basis of the pipeline damage level, determining a target pipeline strength algorithm from among candidate pipeline strength algorithms, and, on the basis of the measurement parameters and according to the target pipeline strength algorithm, calculating a pipeline strength of the target pipeline.

Description

Pipeline strength determination method, device, electronic device and storage medium

[0001] CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0002] This application is based on the Chinese patent application with application number 2024100517365 and application date of January 12, 2024, and claims the priority of the Chinese patent application. The entire content of the Chinese patent application is hereby introduced into this application as a reference. Technical Field

[0003] The present disclosure relates to the technical field of pipeline strength measurement, and in particular to a pipeline strength determination method, device, electronic device, and storage medium. Background Art

[0004] Dry ice (CO2) is not inherently corrosive. However, CO2 is readily soluble in water and, when dissolved, is highly corrosive to certain metals. The resulting material damage is collectively referred to as CO2 corrosion. Due to the numerous factors influencing CO2 pipeline corrosion and the complex corrosion mechanisms, research on the remaining life of pipelines is subject to numerous uncertainties. These uncertainties primarily arise from factors such as pipe material properties, pipe wall thickness, dimensional deviations in the detected corrosion area, and pressure fluctuations, making it difficult to systematically analyze or establish specific functional relationships in theory. Summary of the Invention

[0005] One objective of the present disclosure is to provide a method for determining pipeline strength.

[0006] A second objective of the present disclosure is to provide a pipeline strength determination device.

[0007] A third objective of the present disclosure is to provide an electronic device.

[0008] A fourth object of the present disclosure is to provide a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium.

[0009] A fifth object of the present disclosure is to provide a computer program product.

[0010] A sixth object of the present disclosure is to provide a computer program.

[0011] To achieve the above objectives, a first embodiment of the present disclosure proposes a pipeline strength determination method, comprising: obtaining a measurement beam of an ultrasonic flaw detection device on a target pipeline and measurement parameters of the target pipeline; comparing the measurement beam with a comparison beam sample, and determining a pipeline damage level of the target pipeline based on the comparison result; determining a target pipeline strength algorithm from candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level, and calculating the pipeline strength of the target pipeline according to the target pipeline strength algorithm based on the measurement parameters.

[0012] According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, comparing the measurement beam and the comparison beam sample and determining the pipeline damage level of the target pipeline based on the comparison result includes: in response to the comparison result that the corrosion defect length of the target pipeline is greater than a preset length, determining the damage level as a first level; and in response to the comparison result that the corrosion defect length of the target pipeline is less than or equal to the preset length, determining the damage level as a second level.

[0013] According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, determining a target pipeline strength algorithm from candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level includes: in response to the damage level being the first level, determining a first candidate pipeline strength algorithm as the target pipeline strength algorithm.

[0014] According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, the target pipeline strength algorithm is: Among them, the p f is the pipeline strength of the target pipeline, t is the pipeline wall thickness, D is the pipeline outer diameter, d is the corrosion defect depth, and σ is the stress rheological force.

[0015] According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, determining a target pipeline strength algorithm from candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level includes: in response to the damage level being the second level, determining a second candidate pipeline strength algorithm as the target pipeline strength algorithm.

[0016] According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, the target pipeline strength algorithm is:

[0017] Among them, the p f is the pipeline strength of the target pipeline, t is the pipeline wall thickness, D is the pipeline outer diameter, d is the corrosion defect depth, σ is the strain gravitational force, l is the corrosion defect length of the target pipeline, and M is the expansion coefficient.

[0018] According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, obtaining the corrosion defect length includes: processing the measurement beam based on a length measurement method to obtain the corrosion defect length.

[0019] To achieve the above-mentioned objectives, a second embodiment of the present disclosure proposes a pipeline strength determination device, comprising: an acquisition module for acquiring a measurement beam of an ultrasonic flaw detection device on a target pipeline and measurement parameters of the target pipeline; a comparison module for comparing the measurement beam and a comparison beam sample based on the measurement beam and determining the pipeline damage level of the target pipeline based on the comparison result; and a calculation module for determining a target pipeline strength algorithm from candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level, and calculating the pipeline strength of the target pipeline according to the target pipeline strength algorithm based on the measurement parameters.

[0020] To achieve the above-mentioned objectives, the third aspect of the present disclosure proposes an electronic device, comprising: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, and the instructions are executed by the at least one processor to implement the pipeline strength determination method as described in the embodiment of the first aspect of the present disclosure.

[0021] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the fourth aspect of the present disclosure proposes a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions, wherein the computer instructions are used to implement the pipeline strength determination method as described in the embodiment of the first aspect of the present disclosure.

[0022] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the fifth embodiment of the present disclosure proposes a computer program product, including a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, is used to implement the pipeline strength determination method as described in the embodiment of the first aspect of the present disclosure.

[0023] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the sixth embodiment of the present disclosure proposes a computer program, which includes computer program code. When the computer program code is run on a computer, the computer executes the pipeline strength determination method as described in the first aspect.

[0024] The embodiments of the present disclosure achieve the following beneficial effects:

[0025] By comparing the measurement beam and the comparison beam, the corresponding target pipeline strength algorithm is determined. Compared with the method of determining the pipeline strength by analyzing the measurement beam in the prior art, the measurement cost is lower and the measurement cycle is shorter. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0026] FIG1 is a schematic diagram of a pipeline strength determination method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0027] FIG2 is a schematic diagram of another pipeline strength determination method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0028] FIG3 is a schematic diagram of another pipeline strength determination method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0029] FIG4 is a schematic diagram of a pipeline strength determination device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0030] FIG5 is a schematic diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0031] The following describes in detail embodiments of the present disclosure, examples of which are shown in the accompanying drawings, wherein the same or similar reference numerals throughout represent the same or similar elements or elements having the same or similar functions. The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are exemplary and are intended to be used to explain the present disclosure, and should not be construed as limiting the present disclosure.

[0032] The acquisition, storage, use, and processing of data in this disclosed technical solution comply with the relevant provisions of relevant laws and regulations.

[0033] FIG1 is a schematic diagram of a pipeline strength determination method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG1 , the pipeline strength determination method includes the following steps: S101 - S103 .

[0034] S101, obtaining a measurement beam and measurement parameters of a target pipeline by an ultrasonic flaw detection device.

[0035] The pipeline strength determination method of the embodiment of the present disclosure can be applied to the scenario of ultrasonic pipeline flaw detection. The execution subject of the pipeline strength determination of the embodiment of the present disclosure can be the pipeline strength determination device of the embodiment of the present disclosure, and the pipeline strength determination device can be set on an electronic device.

[0036] Since the corroded parts of the pipeline are generally located inside the pipeline, it is necessary to analyze the corroded parts using ultrasonic flaw detection equipment. For example, ultrasonic flaw detection equipment can be used to locate and perform depth analysis on the corroded parts.

[0037] It should be noted that the measurement parameters may include multiple ones, which are not limited here. For example, they may include the length of the pipeline, the material of the pipeline, the thickness of the pipeline wall, etc.

[0038] S102: performing a comparison based on the measurement beam and the comparison beam sample, and determining a pipeline damage level of the target pipeline based on the comparison result.

[0039] In actual operation, after ultrasonic data is obtained through detection by ultrasonic flaw detection equipment, it is necessary to analyze the ultrasonic data to obtain the length of the corrosion defect, which is very costly.

[0040] The inventors have discovered that when the corrosion defect length reaches a certain value, the effect of the increase in corrosion defect length on pipeline strength is minimal, and the effect of the corrosion defect length on the final pipeline strength calculation can be ignored. This critical value is set in advance and can be obtained through experimental measurements or manual experience. For example, this critical value can be 150 mm.

[0041] It should be noted that the comparison beam sample can be multiple or one, and there is no limitation here. For example, the comparison beam sample is the beam corresponding to the critical value, and the comparison beam sample can also be multiple beams corresponding to different lengths.

[0042] Therefore, the present disclosure proposes that after a measurement beam is acquired, the measurement beam may be first compared with a beam sample to determine whether the current measurement beam exceeds a critical value.

[0043] It should be noted that there are many comparison methods, which are not limited here and can be specifically limited according to actual design requirements.

[0044] In some embodiments, a comparison result can be obtained by inputting the measurement beam and comparison beam into a pre-trained comparison model. This comparison model is used to determine whether the corrosion defect length of the current target pipeline has reached a critical value based on the measurement beam and comparison beam. It should be noted that the comparison model can be stored in the storage space of the electronic device for easy access when needed.

[0045] In some embodiments, the comparison result of the measurement beam and the comparison beam samples can be determined by calculating a difference value between the measurement beam and the comparison beam samples. The difference value can be calculated using a difference value algorithm or obtained by processing using a preset difference calculation application.

[0046] S103: determining a target pipeline strength algorithm from candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level, and calculating the pipeline strength of the target pipeline according to the target pipeline strength algorithm based on the measurement parameters.

[0047] It should be noted that the target pipeline strength algorithms corresponding to different pipeline damage levels may be different, and no limitation is made here.

[0048] In the disclosed embodiment, the ultrasonic flaw detection equipment first obtains the measurement beam and measurement parameters of the target pipeline. Then, the measurement beam and comparison beam samples are compared, and the target pipeline damage level is determined based on the comparison results. Finally, a target pipeline strength algorithm is determined from candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level, and the pipeline strength of the target pipeline is calculated according to the target pipeline strength algorithm based on the measurement parameters. Thus, by comparing the measurement beam and comparison beam to determine the corresponding target pipeline strength algorithm, compared to the existing method of determining pipeline strength by analyzing the measurement beam, the measurement cost is lower and the measurement cycle is shorter.

[0049] It should be noted that two pipeline damage levels are set in the present disclosure. In response to the comparison result that the corrosion defect length of the target pipeline is greater than the preset length, the damage level is determined to be the first level. In response to the comparison result that the corrosion defect length of the target pipeline is less than or equal to the preset length, the damage level is determined to be the second level.

[0050] In the above embodiment, the target pipeline strength algorithm is determined from the candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level. As further explained in FIG2 , the method includes:

[0051] S201: In response to the damage level being the first level, determining the first candidate pipeline strength algorithm as the target pipeline strength algorithm. It should be noted that the target pipeline strength algorithm is:

[0052] Among them, p f is the pipeline strength of the target pipeline, t is the pipeline wall thickness, D is the pipeline outer diameter, d is the corrosion defect depth, and σ is the stress rheological force.

[0053] It should be noted that pipeline strength, pipeline wall thickness, pipeline outer diameter, corrosion defect depth, and stress rheology can be obtained through measurement. There are many ways to obtain these data, and different data may require different acquisition methods, which will not be detailed here.

[0054] In the above embodiment, the target pipeline strength algorithm is determined from the candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level, which can be further explained by FIG3 . The method includes:

[0055] S301 : In response to the damage level being the second level, determining a second candidate pipeline strength algorithm as a target pipeline strength algorithm.

[0056] Among them, p f is the pipeline strength of the target pipeline, t is the pipeline wall thickness, D is the pipeline outer diameter, d is the corrosion defect depth, σ is the stress rheological force, l is the corrosion defect length of the target pipeline, and M is the expansion coefficient.

[0057] It should be noted that pipeline strength, pipeline wall thickness, pipeline outer diameter, corrosion defect depth, and stress rheology can be obtained through measurement. There are many ways to obtain these data, and different data may require different acquisition methods, which will not be detailed here.

[0058] The length of a corrosion defect can be determined by processing the measurement beam using the length measurement method. Specifically, the length measurement method determines the defect size based on the defect wave height and the probe travel distance. The defect length measured using the specified method is called the indicated length of the defect. Because the orientation, nature, and surface condition of the defect in the actual workpiece affect the defect echo height, the indicated length of the defect is always less than or equal to the actual defect length. Length measurement methods are categorized into relative sensitivity, absolute sensitivity, and endpoint peak methods based on the sensitivity criteria used to determine defect length.

[0059] It should be noted that the expansion coefficient also needs to be determined based on the depth of the corrosion defect. Different corrosion defect depths correspond to different expansion coefficient calculation methods. In the embodiment of the present disclosure, the formula for calculating the expansion coefficient is as follows:

[0060] As can be seen from the embodiments of Figures 2 and 3, when the damage level is Level 1, there is no need to obtain the corrosion defect length. Therefore, by setting the damage level, the amount of calculation and data processing required when the corrosion defect length reaches a predetermined value can be reduced, thereby reducing the cost of calculating the pipeline strength of the target pipeline.

[0061] Corresponding to the pipeline strength determination methods provided in the above-mentioned embodiments, an embodiment of the present disclosure also provides a pipeline strength determination device. Since the pipeline strength determination device provided in the embodiment of the present disclosure corresponds to the pipeline strength determination methods provided in the above-mentioned embodiments, the implementation methods of the above-mentioned pipeline strength determination methods are also applicable to the pipeline strength determination device provided in the embodiment of the present disclosure and will not be described in detail in the following embodiments.

[0062] FIG4 is a schematic diagram of a pipeline strength determination device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG4 , the pipeline strength determination device 400 includes: an acquisition module 410 , a comparison module 420 and a calculation module 430 .

[0063] The acquisition module 410 is used to obtain the measurement beam of the ultrasonic flaw detection equipment on the target pipeline and the measurement parameters of the target pipeline;

[0064] a comparison module 420 for comparing the measurement beam and the comparison beam sample, and determining the pipeline damage level of the target pipeline based on the comparison result;

[0065] The calculation module 430 is configured to determine a target pipeline strength algorithm from candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level, and calculate the pipeline strength of the target pipeline according to the target pipeline strength algorithm based on the measurement parameters.

[0066] In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the comparison module 420 is further configured to: determine the damage level as a first level in response to a comparison result indicating that the length of the corrosion defect of the target pipeline is greater than a preset length; and determine the damage level as a second level in response to a comparison result indicating that the length of the corrosion defect of the target pipeline is less than or equal to the preset length.

[0067] In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the comparison module 420 is further configured to: in response to the damage level being the first level, determine the first candidate pipeline strength algorithm as the target pipeline strength algorithm.

[0068] In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the target pipeline strength algorithm is: Among them, p f is the pipeline strength of the target pipeline, t is the pipeline wall thickness, D is the pipeline outer diameter, d is the corrosion defect depth, and σ is the stress rheological force.

[0069] In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the comparison module 420 is further configured to: in response to the damage level being the second level, determine the second candidate pipeline strength algorithm as the target pipeline strength algorithm.

[0070] In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the target pipeline strength algorithm is: Among them, p f is the pipeline strength of the target pipeline, t is the pipeline wall thickness, D is the pipeline outer diameter, d is the corrosion defect depth, σ is the stress rheological force, l is the corrosion defect length of the target pipeline, and M is the expansion coefficient.

[0071] In one embodiment of the present disclosure, obtaining the corrosion defect length includes: processing the measurement beam based on a length measurement method to obtain the corrosion defect length.

[0072] Therefore, by comparing the measurement beam and the comparison beam, the corresponding target pipeline strength algorithm is determined. Compared with the method of determining the pipeline strength by analyzing the measurement beam in the prior art, the measurement cost is lower and the measurement cycle is shorter.

[0073] To implement the above embodiment, the present disclosure further provides an electronic device 500. FIG5 is a schematic diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG5 , the electronic device 500 includes a processor 501 and a memory 502 communicatively connected to the processor. The memory 502 stores instructions executable by at least one processor. The instructions are executed by the at least one processor 501 to implement the pipeline strength determination method according to the embodiments of FIG1 to FIG3 of the present disclosure.

[0074] In order to implement the above embodiment, the embodiment of the present disclosure further proposes a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions, wherein the computer instructions are used to enable a computer to implement the pipeline strength determination method of the embodiment of Figures 1 to 3 of the present disclosure.

[0075] In order to implement the above embodiments, the embodiments of the present disclosure further provide a computer program product, including a computer program. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the pipeline strength determination method of the embodiments of FIG. 1 to FIG. 3 of the present disclosure is implemented.

[0076] In order to implement the above embodiment, the embodiment of the present disclosure further proposes a computer program, which includes computer program code. When the computer program code runs on a computer, it enables the computer to execute the pipeline strength determination method of the embodiment of Figures 1 to 3 of the present disclosure.

[0077] It is important to note that personal information collected from users should be used for legitimate and reasonable purposes and should not be shared or sold beyond these legitimate uses. Furthermore, such collection / sharing should be conducted only after receiving the user's informed consent, including but not limited to notifying the user to read the user agreement / user notice and sign an agreement / authorization that includes the relevant user information before using the feature. Furthermore, any necessary steps must be taken to safeguard and secure access to such personal information and ensure that others with access to personal information comply with its privacy policy and procedures.

[0078] This disclosure contemplates providing implementations that allow users to selectively block the use or access of personal information data. Specifically, this disclosure contemplates providing hardware and / or software to prevent or block access to such personal information data. Risks can be minimized by limiting data collection and deleting data once it is no longer needed. Furthermore, where applicable, such personal information can be de-identified to protect user privacy.

[0079] In the descriptions of the aforementioned embodiments, the reference terms "one embodiment", "some embodiments", "example", "specific example", or "some examples" mean that the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiment or example are included in at least one embodiment or example of the present disclosure. In this specification, the schematic expressions of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Moreover, the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described may be combined in any one or more embodiments or examples in a suitable manner. In addition, those skilled in the art may combine and combine the different embodiments or examples described in this specification and the features of the different embodiments or examples, unless they are mutually inconsistent.

[0080] Furthermore, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of technical features being referred to. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one such feature. Throughout the present disclosure, "plurality" means at least two, such as two, three, etc., unless otherwise specifically defined.

[0081] Any process or method description in a flowchart or otherwise described herein may be understood to represent a module, segment or portion of code comprising one or more executable instructions for implementing the steps of a custom logical function or process, and the scope of the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure includes additional implementations in which functions may be performed out of the order shown or discussed, including performing functions in a substantially simultaneous manner or in the reverse order depending on the functions involved, which should be understood by those skilled in the art to which the embodiments of the present disclosure belong.

[0082] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowcharts or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as a sequenced list of executable instructions for implementing the logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device (e.g., a computer-based system, a system including a processor, or other system that can fetch and execute instructions from an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device). For purposes of this specification, a "computer-readable medium" can be any device that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of computer-readable media include the following: an electrical connection with one or more wires (electronic devices), a portable computer disk cartridge (magnetic device), random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable and programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), fiber optic devices, and a portable compact disc read-only memory (CDROM). Furthermore, the computer-readable medium may even be paper or other suitable medium on which the program is printed, since the program may be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other medium and then editing, interpreting or processing it in another suitable manner if necessary, and then storing it in a computer memory.

[0083] It should be understood that various parts of the present disclosure can be implemented using hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented using software or firmware stored in a memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented using hardware, as in another embodiment, any one of the following technologies known in the art or a combination thereof can be used to implement: a discrete logic circuit having a logic gate circuit for implementing a logic function on a data signal, an application-specific integrated circuit having a suitable combination of logic gate circuits, a programmable gate array (PGA), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), etc.

[0084] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps in the method of the above embodiment can be completed by instructing related hardware through a program, and the program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When the program is executed, it includes one or a combination of the steps of the method embodiment.

[0085] In addition, the functional units in the various embodiments of the present disclosure may be integrated into a single processing module, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into a single module. The aforementioned integrated modules may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional modules. If the integrated modules are implemented in the form of software functional modules and sold or used as independent products, they may also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium.

[0086] The storage medium mentioned above may be a read-only memory, a magnetic disk, or an optical disk, etc. Although the embodiments of the present disclosure have been shown and described above, it is understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting the present disclosure. A person of ordinary skill in the art may make changes, modifications, substitutions, and variations to the above embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure.

Claims

1. A method for determining pipeline strength, comprising: Obtaining a measurement beam of an ultrasonic flaw detection device for a target pipeline and measurement parameters of the target pipeline; Comparing the measurement beam with a comparison beam sample, and determining a pipeline damage level of the target pipeline based on the comparison result; And Determining a target pipeline strength algorithm from candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level, and calculating the pipeline strength of the target pipeline according to the target pipeline strength algorithm based on the measurement parameters.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein The comparing the measurement beam with a comparison beam sample and determining a pipeline damage level of the target pipeline based on the comparison result includes: In response to the comparison result indicating that the corrosion defect length of the target pipeline is greater than a preset length, determining that the damage level is the first level; and In response to the comparison result indicating that the corrosion defect length of the target pipeline is less than or equal to the preset length, determining that the damage level is the second level.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein The determining a target pipeline strength algorithm from candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level includes: In response to the damage level being the first level, determining a first candidate pipeline strength algorithm as the target pipeline strength algorithm.

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein The target pipeline strength algorithm is as follows: wherein, the p f is the pipe strength of the target pipe, the t is the pipe wall thickness, the D is the pipe outer diameter, the d is the corrosion defect depth, and the σ is the yield stress.

5. The method according to claim 2, wherein The determining a target pipeline strength algorithm from candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level includes: In response to the damage level being the second level, determining a second candidate pipeline strength algorithm as the target pipeline strength algorithm.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein, The target pipeline strength algorithm is as follows: wherein, the p f is the pipe strength of the target pipe, the t is the pipe wall thickness, the D is the pipe outer diameter, the d is the corrosion defect depth, the σ is the yield stress, the l is the corrosion defect length of the target pipe, and the M is the expansion coefficient.

7. The method according to any one of claims 2 to 6, wherein Obtaining the corrosion defect length includes: Processing the measurement beam based on the length measurement method to obtain the corrosion defect length.

8. A device for determining pipeline strength, comprising: An obtaining module configured to obtain a measurement beam of an ultrasonic flaw detection device for a target pipeline and measurement parameters of the target pipeline; A comparison module configured to compare the measurement beam with a comparison beam sample and determine a pipeline damage level of the target pipeline based on the comparison result; And A calculation module configured to determine a target pipeline strength algorithm from candidate pipeline strength algorithms based on the pipeline damage level, and calculate the pipeline strength of the target pipeline according to the target pipeline strength algorithm based on the measurement parameters.

9. An electronic device, comprising a memory and a processor; Among them, The processor runs a program corresponding to the executable program code by reading the executable program code stored in the memory, so as to implement the method according to any one of claims 1-7.

10. A computer program product, comprising a computer program or instructions, wherein, The computer program instructions, when executed by the processor, implement the method according to any one of claims 1-7.

11. A computer-readable storage medium, wherein computer-executable instructions are stored in the computer-readable storage medium, and when the computer-executable instructions are executed by a processor, they are used to implement the method according to any one of claims 1-7.

12. A computer program, the computer program includes computer program code, and when the computer program code runs on a computer, it causes the computer to execute the method according to any one of claims 1-7.

Images