Composite particles
Composite particles with supported ammonia-generating compounds on carriers like silicon carbide or carbon black efficiently produce ammonia at lower temperatures, addressing the inefficiencies of existing catalyst systems by enhancing production and stability.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- WO · WO
- Patent Type
- Applications
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-09-30
- Publication Date
- 2026-04-02
AI Technical Summary
The inefficient conversion of solid nitrogen-containing compounds like urea into ammonia using reducing agent decomposition catalysts such as alumina and silica at room temperature and pressure, necessitating high temperatures of 250°C to 500°C.
Composite particles are developed with an ammonia-generating compound supported on a carrier, such as silicon carbide, alumina, titania, or carbon black, ensuring the compound and carrier remain in constant contact, allowing efficient ammonia production even at temperatures below 200°C.
The composite particles enhance ammonia generation efficiency, producing up to three times more ammonia at lower temperatures compared to heating the ammonia-generating compound alone, with improved handling properties and stability.
Smart Images

Figure JP2025034665_02042026_PF_FP_ABST
Abstract
Description
composite particles
[0001] This disclosure relates to composite particles.
[0002] Patent Document 1 describes a method of decomposing a reducing agent into ammonia by contacting a reducing agent decomposition catalyst such as alumina or silica with a heated gas (such as air) containing water vapor, which is a nitrogen-containing compound that is solid at room temperature and pressure.
[0003] Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 5-15739
[0004] However, the contact between reducing agents such as urea, which are solid nitrogen-containing compounds at room temperature and pressure, and reducing agent decomposition catalysts such as alumina and silica is insufficient, resulting in inefficient conversion to ammonia. Therefore, a challenge was the need to heat the reducing agent decomposition catalyst to 250°C to 500°C.
[0005] This disclosure aims to provide composite particles that can efficiently generate ammonia.
[0006] The present disclosure provides a composite particle in which an ammonia-generating compound is supported on a carrier, wherein the carrier is at least one selected from the group consisting of silicon carbide, alumina, titania, silica, zirconia, ceria, silica-alumina, calcia, magnesia, and carbon black, and the ammonia-generating compound is a compound that generates ammonia upon heating, is insoluble in perfluorohexane, and has a specific gravity less than that of perfluorohexane at 20°C.
[0007] With these composite particles, the ammonia-generating compound and the carrier are in constant contact, allowing for efficient conversion of the ammonia-generating compound to ammonia upon heating, and enabling sufficient ammonia production even at temperatures below 200°C.
[0008] According to this disclosure, it is possible to provide composite particles that can efficiently generate ammonia.
[0009] Figure 1 shows the relationship between NH and heating time. 3This is a graph showing absorbance. Figure 2 shows the relationship between NH and heating temperature. 3 This is a graph showing absorbance. Figure 3 is a schematic diagram showing the state in which the entire amount of the support introduced into perfluorohexane is submerged in the liquid. Figure 4 is a schematic diagram showing the state in which the entire amount of the ammonia-generating compound introduced into perfluorohexane is floating on the liquid surface. Figure 5 is a schematic diagram showing the state in which some of the composite particles introduced into perfluorohexane are floating on the liquid surface, and the rest are submerged in the liquid. Figure 6 is a schematic diagram showing the state in which the entire amount of composite particles introduced into perfluorohexane is floating on the liquid surface. Figure 7 is a schematic diagram showing the state in which the entire amount of composite particles introduced into perfluorohexane is submerged in the liquid.
[0010] The following describes specific embodiments of this disclosure in detail, but this disclosure is not limited to the embodiments described below.
[0011] 1. Composite particles The composite particles of this disclosure contain an ammonia-generating compound and a carrier.
[0012] The support is at least one selected from the group consisting of silicon carbide, alumina, titania, silica, zirconia, ceria, silica-alumina, calcia, magnesia, and carbon black. All of the support materials contained in the composite particles of this disclosure are insoluble in perfluorohexane and have a specific gravity greater than that of perfluorohexane at 20°C. Therefore, when only the support is added to perfluorohexane at 20°C, the entire amount of the added support sinks into the liquid (see Figure 3).
[0013] As a support material, at least one selected from the group consisting of silicon carbide, alumina, titania, silica, and carbon black is preferred, and at least one selected from the group consisting of silicon carbide and silica is more preferred, as it can generate ammonia more efficiently.
[0014] The BET specific surface area of the carrier is preferably 5 to 300 m², as this allows for more efficient ammonia generation. 2 / g, more preferably 15m 2 It is 1 / g or more, and more preferably 25m2 / g or more, and more preferably 35 m 2 / g or more, particularly preferably 50 m 2 / g or more, more preferably 250 m 2 / g or less, more preferably 200 m 2 / g or less, and more preferably 150 m 2 / g or less, particularly preferably 100 m 2 / g or less. In particular, when the BET specific surface area of the carrier is within the above range, it tends to be easy to balance the ammonia generation efficiency and the handling property of the composite particles at a high level.
[0015] The BET specific surface area of the carrier can be calculated by the BET method using a specific surface area measuring device. The BET method is a method of measuring the amount of gas (nitrogen gas) physically adsorbed on the particle surface when the particles are in a low-temperature state and calculating the specific surface area. For the measurement of the BET specific surface area, Macsorb HM-1208 manufactured by Mountech Co., Ltd. was used.
[0016] The bulk density of the carrier is preferably 0.01 g / cm 3 or more, more preferably 0.03 g / cm 3 or more, still more preferably 0.05 g / cm 3 or more, preferably 1.00 g / cm 3 or less, more preferably 0.80 g / cm 3 or less.
[0017] The bulk density of the carrier is obtained by collecting W (g) of the carrier particles as a measurement sample, allowing this measurement sample to fall naturally into a graduated cylinder, and then gently shaking to make the apparent volume V (cm 3 ) constant, measuring its mass and volume, and calculating based on the following formula. Bulk density (g / cm 3 ) = mass of the measurement sample [W (g)] / volume of the measurement sample [V (cm 3 )]
[0018] The ammonia-generating compound contained in the composite particles of this disclosure is insoluble in perfluorohexane and has a specific gravity lower than that of perfluorohexane at 20°C. Therefore, when only the ammonia-generating compound is added to perfluorohexane at 20°C, the entire amount of the added ammonia-generating compound floats on the surface of the liquid (see Figure 4).
[0019] In the composite particles of this disclosure, the ammonia-generating compound is supported on a carrier. In this disclosure, if the particles are placed in perfluorohexane adjusted to a temperature of 20°C, the perfluorohexane is stirred for 1 minute, and after sufficient standing, the particles are not separated in the perfluorohexane, then it can be said that the ammonia-generating compound is supported on the carrier.
[0020] If the ammonia-generating compound is not supported on a carrier, but merely in contact with the carrier, some of the particles introduced into perfluorohexane will float on the surface, while the rest of the particles will sink (see Figure 5).
[0021] On the other hand, in the case of composite particles in which the ammonia-generating compound is supported on a carrier, the entire amount of composite particles added to perfluorohexane will either float on the surface of the liquid or sink (see Figures 6 and 7). The buoyancy or sinking of the composite particles is determined by the ratio of the ammonia-generating compound to the carrier within the composite particles.
[0022] The ammonia-generating compound contained in the composite particles of this disclosure is a compound that generates ammonia upon heating. In the composite particles of this disclosure, the ammonia-generating compound is supported on a carrier. Therefore, by heating the composite particles of this disclosure, ammonia can be generated more efficiently than when only the ammonia-generating compound is heated.
[0023] In one embodiment, by heating the composite particles of the present disclosure, a larger amount of ammonia can be generated than when heating only the ammonia-generating compound, even if the heating temperature and heating time are the same.
[0024] In one embodiment, the amount of ammonia generated when the composite particles are heated at 180°C for 30 minutes is 1.1 times or more the amount of ammonia generated when only the ammonia-generating compound is heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. The amount of ammonia generated when the composite particles are heated at 180°C for 30 minutes may be 1.3 times or more, 1.5 times or more, 1.7 times or more, 1.9 times or more, 2.1 times or more, or 2.3 times or more the amount of ammonia generated when only the ammonia-generating compound is heated at 180°C for 30 minutes, and may be 5.0 times or less, 4.5 times or less, 4.0 or less, or 3.5 times or less. Thus, by heating the composite particles of the present disclosure, a larger amount of ammonia can be generated compared to heating only the ammonia-generating compound.
[0025] In one embodiment, by heating the composite particles of the present disclosure at a temperature lower than that when only the ammonia-generating compound is heated, an amount of ammonia equal to or more than that generated when only the ammonia-generating compound is heated can be generated. In one embodiment, by heating the composite particles of the present disclosure at a temperature 20°C or more lower than that when only the ammonia-generating compound is heated, an amount of ammonia equal to or more than that generated when only the ammonia-generating compound is heated can be generated.
[0026] In one embodiment, the ammonia generation temperature of the composite particles is 70 to 300°C. The ammonia generation temperature of the composite particles is preferably 80°C or more, more preferably 90°C or more, still more preferably 100°C or more, and yet even more preferably 110°C or more. Also, even when the composite particles of the present disclosure are heated to a low temperature range such as 180°C or less, 170°C or less, 160°C or less, or 150°C or less, a sufficient amount of ammonia is generated from the composite particles of the present disclosure.
[0027] As described above, by heating the composite particles of the present disclosure, a larger amount of ammonia can be generated compared to heating only the ammonia-generating compound, or the same amount or more of ammonia can be generated at a lower temperature. That is, the composite particles of the present disclosure can efficiently generate ammonia.
[0028] The average particle diameter of the composite particles of the present disclosure is preferably from 0.01 to 200 μm, more preferably 0.05 μm or more, still more preferably 0.1 μm or more, more preferably 150 μm or less, and still more preferably 100 μm or less. The average particle diameter of the composite particles is the median diameter determined using a laser diffraction particle size distribution analyzer. When the average particle diameter of the composite particles is within the above range, it tends to be easier to balance the ammonia generation efficiency and the handleability of the composite particles at a high level.
[0029] Since the content of the ammonia-generating compound in the composite particles of the present disclosure can generate ammonia more efficiently, it is preferably 1% by mass or more, more preferably 3% by mass or more, still more preferably 5% by mass or more, yet still more preferably 8% by mass or more, even more preferably 10% by mass or more, preferably 90% by mass or less, more preferably 80% by mass or less, still more preferably 70% by mass or less, yet still more preferably 50% by mass or less, based on the total mass of the ammonia-generating compound and the carrier.
[0030] When the carrier is silicon carbide, since the content of the ammonia-generating compound in the composite particles of the present disclosure can generate ammonia more efficiently, it is preferably 1% by mass or more, more preferably 5% by mass or more, still more preferably 8% by mass or more, yet still more preferably 10% by mass or more, preferably 90% by mass or less, more preferably 80% by mass or less, still more preferably 70% by mass or less, yet still more preferably 30% by mass or less, based on the total mass of the ammonia-generating compound and the carrier.
[0031] When the carrier is silica, the content of the ammonia-generating compound in the composite particles of this disclosure is preferably 1% by mass or more, more preferably 5% by mass or more, even more preferably 10% by mass or more, preferably 90% by mass or less, more preferably 80% by mass or less, even more preferably 50% by mass or less, and still more preferably 30% by mass or less, based on the total mass of the ammonia-generating compound and the carrier, in order to generate ammonia more efficiently.
[0032] When the carrier is carbon black, the content of the ammonia-generating compound in the composite particles of this disclosure is preferably 1% by mass or more, more preferably 5% by mass or more, even more preferably 10% by mass or more, preferably 90% by mass or less, more preferably 50% by mass or less, and even more preferably 30% by mass or less, relative to the total mass of the ammonia-generating compound and the carrier, in order to generate ammonia more efficiently.
[0033] The melting point of the ammonia-generating compound is preferably 100 to 350°C, more preferably 120°C or higher, and more preferably 340°C or lower. In particular, by using an ammonia-generating compound that is solid below 100°C, the ammonia-generating compound can remain stable in the composite particles even when the composite particles are stored for a long period of time, improving the handling of the composite particles.
[0034] As the ammonia-generating compound, at least one selected from urea, acetylurea, biuret, inorganic ammonium salts, N-phenylbenzamidine, and guanidines is preferred, more preferably at least one selected from urea, inorganic ammonium salts, and guanidines, and even more preferably urea.
[0035] Examples of guanidines include phenylguanidine, diphenylguanidine, cyanoguanidine, guanidine hydrochloride, and guanidine carbonate. An example of an inorganic ammonium salt is ammonium chloride.
[0036] The composite particles of this disclosure can efficiently generate ammonia when heated, and therefore can be suitably used in applications where efficient ammonia generation during use is required. The composite particles of this disclosure can be suitably used, for example, as a polymer additive or fertilizer.
[0037] 2. Method for Manufacturing Composite Particles The composite particles of this disclosure can be manufactured by a manufacturing method in which an ammonia-generating compound is supported on a carrier, for example, using a thermal plasma method, an impregnation support method, or a mechanical particle composite method.
[0038] One method for producing composite particles using the thermal plasma method is to supply a carrier into a thermal plasma flame to put the carrier into a gas phase state, rapidly cool the carrier in the gas phase state by supplying a cooling gas toward the terminal end of the thermal plasma flame to generate primary carrier particles, and then supply an ammonia-generating compound to the primary carrier particles to support the ammonia-generating compound on the primary carrier particles.
[0039] The temperature of the thermal plasma flame must be higher than the boiling point of the carrier. For example, the temperature of the thermal plasma flame can be set to 6000°C. The atmospheric pressure of the thermal plasma flame is preferably below atmospheric pressure, for example, 0.5 to 100 kPa. The shape of the carrier supplied into the thermal plasma flame is preferably in powder form. The supply of the ammonia-generating compound to the primary fine particles can be carried out, for example, by spraying an aqueous solution of the ammonia-generating compound onto the primary fine particles. Preferably, the aqueous solution of the ammonia-generating compound is sprayed into an atmosphere in which the ammonia-generating compound does not thermally decompose. The droplets containing the sprayed ammonia-generating compound come into contact with the primary fine particles, the solvent then evaporates, and the ammonia-generating compound precipitates on the primary fine particles.
[0040] One method for producing composite particles using the impregnation-supporting method involves adding a support to a solution of an ammonia-generating compound and evaporating the solvent to support the ammonia-generating compound on the support. The solution of the ammonia-generating compound is preferably an aqueous solution. The solvent is preferably water.
[0041] The mechanical particle compounding method is a method of producing composite particles by applying mechanical forces such as compressive force, shear force, frictional force, and impact force while mixing an ammonia-generating compound with a carrier, thereby coating the surface of the carrier with the ammonia-generating compound. For example, one method is to mix the ammonia-generating compound and the carrier while crushing them using a mortar and pestle. In a method in which the ammonia-generating compound and carrier are placed in a bag and the bag is shaken, no mechanical force is applied to the ammonia-generating compound or the carrier, so the ammonia-generating compound cannot be supported on the carrier.
[0042] Although embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that various modifications to the form and details are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the claims.
[0043] <1> According to a first aspect of this disclosure, composite particles are provided in which an ammonia-generating compound is supported on a carrier, wherein the carrier is at least one selected from the group consisting of silicon carbide, alumina, titania, silica, zirconia, ceria, silica-alumina, calcia, magnesia, and carbon black, and the ammonia-generating compound is a compound that generates ammonia upon heating, is insoluble in perfluorohexane, and has a specific gravity less than that of perfluorohexane at 20°C. <2> According to a second aspect of this disclosure, composite particles according to the first aspect are provided in which the amount of ammonia generated when the composite particles are heated at 180°C for 30 minutes is 1.1 times or more the amount of ammonia generated when only the ammonia-generating compound is heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. <3> According to a third aspect of this disclosure, composite particles according to the first or second aspect are provided in which the content of the ammonia-generating compound in the composite particles is 1% by mass or more with respect to the total mass of the ammonia-generating compound and the carrier. <4> According to a fourth aspect of this disclosure, composite particles according to any one of the first to third aspects are provided, wherein the ammonia generation temperature of the composite particles is 70 to 300°C. <5> According to a fifth aspect of this disclosure, composite particles according to any one of the first to fourth aspects are provided, wherein the melting point of the ammonia generation compound is 100 to 350°C. <6> According to a sixth aspect of this disclosure, composite particles according to any one of the first to fifth aspects are provided, wherein the ammonia generation compound is at least one selected from urea, acetylurea, biuret, N-phenylbenzamidine, and guanidines. <7> According to a seventh aspect of this disclosure, the BET specific surface area of the carrier is 5 to 300 m². 2 A composite particle according to any of the first to sixth aspects is provided, which is / g. <8> According to the eighth aspect of the present disclosure, a composite particle according to any of the first to seventh aspects is provided, which is obtained by a manufacturing method that supports the ammonia-generating compound on the carrier using a thermal plasma method, an impregnation-supporting method or a mechanical particle composite method.
[0044] Next, embodiments of the present disclosure will be described with reference to examples, but the present disclosure is not limited to such embodiments.
[0045] Preparation Example 1 In Preparation Example 1, silicon carbide particles with a particle size of approximately 2-3 μm were used as raw materials and supplied into a thermal plasma flame using a powder feeder. The input to the high-frequency oscillation coil for generating the thermal plasma flame was kept constant at 50 kW, and the pressure inside the plasma torch was fixed at 40 kPa. Argon gas and hydrogen gas were used as the plasma gas, with the flow rate of argon gas set to 210 liters / min (converted to standard conditions) and the flow rate of hydrogen gas set to 15 liters / min (converted to standard conditions). Argon gas was used as the cooling gas, with the flow rate of argon gas set to 400 liters / min (converted to standard conditions). Urea was used as the ammonia-generating compound, and water was used as the solvent. An aqueous solution containing urea (urea concentration 25.0 W / W%) was sprayed onto the primary silicon carbide particles using a spray gas from a region where the urea does not thermally decompose. Argon gas was used as the spray gas. The urea used was manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries (melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335).
[0046] Preparation Example 2: Preparation Example 2 was the same as Preparation Example 1, except that methane gas was added to the argon gas used as the cooling gas, and the flow rate of the methane gas was set to 0.5 liters / minute.
[0047] Evaluation of Ammonia Generation 1: Samples (composite particles prepared in Preparation Example 1 and urea from Comparative Example 3) were placed in a reactor. While flowing a gas adjusted to an oxygen concentration of 20 vol% and a nitrogen concentration of 80 vol% at a rate of 10 cc / min, the temperature inside the reactor was raised from room temperature to 180°C, and then the samples were heated at 180°C for a predetermined time. The ammonia generated by heating was measured using a Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FT-IR). Note that the evaluation of ammonia generation was performed using a wavenumber of 966 cm⁻¹. -1 The absorbance was used. Figure 1 shows the ammonia generation behavior with respect to heating time per 2 mg of urea. The heating time shown in Figure 1 is defined as the time when the temperature inside the reactor reaches 180°C, with 0 minutes being the time. If ammonia is generated from the sample before the temperature inside the reactor reaches 180°C, then even at the point of 0 minutes of heating, NH3 The absorbance is greater than 0.
[0048] As shown in Figure 1, it can be seen that when composite particles of urea and silicon carbide are heated at 180°C, more ammonia is generated than when urea alone is used.
[0049] Evaluation of Ammonia Generation 2 Samples (composite particles prepared in Preparation Example 1 and urea from Comparative Example 3) were placed in a reactor, and the reactor was heated at a heating rate of 4°C / min while flowing a gas adjusted to an oxygen concentration of 20 vol% and a nitrogen concentration of 80 vol% at a rate of 10 cc / min. The ammonia generated by heating was measured using a Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FT-IR). Note that the evaluation of ammonia generation was performed using a wavenumber of 966 cm⁻¹. -1 The absorbance was used. Figure 2 shows the ammonia evolution behavior with respect to heating temperature per 2 mg of urea.
[0050] As shown in Figure 2, when comparing composite particles of urea and silicon carbide (Preparation Example 1) with urea alone, the NH of both is 3 Differences in absorbance began to be observed at 80°C, with the absorbance of urea alone being compared to that of the composite particles NH 3 It can be seen that the absorbance increases by approximately three times at 100°C, by approximately 15 times at 120°C, and by approximately 25 times at 140°C. Therefore, it can be seen that by heating the composite particles of urea and silicon carbide at a temperature more than 20°C lower than when heating urea alone, it is possible to generate the same or greater amount of ammonia compared to heating urea alone.
[0051] Immersion test of particles in perfluorohexane 30 ml of perfluorohexane (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., specific gravity 1.69) was poured into a 50 ml glass screw tube, 100 mg of particles were added, and the mixture was stirred for 1 minute at 270 rpm using a magnetic stirrer. After standing for 30 minutes, the separation state was visually observed and evaluated according to the following criteria. Y: As shown in Figure 5, some of the particles were floating on the liquid surface and some of the particles were submerged in the liquid. N: As shown in Figure 6, the entire amount of particles was floating on the liquid surface, or as shown in Figure 7, the entire amount of particles was submerged in the liquid. If the entire amount of particles is floating on the liquid surface or the entire amount of particles is submerged in the liquid, it can be said that the ammonia-generating compound is supported on the carrier.
[0052] Weight loss rate of ammonia-generating compounds after heating at 180°C for 30 minutes The initial weight of the sample (particles) was weighed using an analytical balance (product name: AUX220 (manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation)), and the sample was heated in a 180°C oven for 30 minutes. After heating, the weight was weighed using an analytical balance (product name: AUX220 (manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation)). The weight loss rate (mass %) was calculated using the following formula: Weight loss rate (%) = (A - B) / A A = Initial weight of particles (g) × Ammonia-generating compound content in composite particles (mass %) / 100) B = Weight of particles after heating at 180°C for 30 minutes (g) - Initial weight of particles (g) × Carrier content in composite particles (mass %) / 100)
[0053] Furthermore, the weight loss ratio of the particles was calculated using the following formula: Weight loss ratio = D / E D = Weight loss rate of the ammonia-generating compound in the composite particles (%) E = Weight loss rate of only the ammonia-generating compound contained in the composite particles (%) (The weight loss rate (%) of E is as described in Comparative Examples 3 to 5 in Table 1.) The weight loss ratio is the ratio of the amount of ammonia generated when the composite particles are heated at 180°C for 30 minutes to the amount of ammonia generated when only the ammonia-generating compound is heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. The more efficiently the composite particles can generate ammonia, the larger the weight loss ratio. In other words, the ammonia generation efficiency of the composite particles can be determined from the weight loss ratio.
[0054] Example 1: The weight loss rate of urea was measured when the composite particles prepared in Preparation Example 1 were heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state of the particles in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0055] Example 2: The weight loss rate of urea was measured when the composite particles prepared in Preparation Example 2 were heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state of the particles in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0056] Example 3: Urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335) as the ammonia-generating compound and silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support were weighed in a weight ratio of 10:90 and thoroughly mixed using a mortar and pestle until homogenized to prepare composite particles. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when these composite particles were heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0057] Example 4: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02271) was used as the support instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071). The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0058] Example 5: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silicon carbide (NMSiC99, manufactured by Nanomakers) was used as the support instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071), and urea and silicon carbide were weighed in a weight ratio of 90:10. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0059] Example 6: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silicon carbide (NMSiC99, manufactured by Nanomakers) was used as the support instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071), and urea and silicon carbide were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0060] Example 7: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silicon carbide (NMSiC99, manufactured by Nanomakers) was used as the support instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071), and urea and silicon carbide were weighed in a weight ratio of 50:50. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0061] Example 8: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silicon carbide (NMSiC99, manufactured by Nanomakers) was used as the support instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071), and urea and silicon carbide were weighed in a weight ratio of 30:70. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0062] Example 9: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silicon carbide (NMSiC99, manufactured by Nanomakers) was used as the support instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071), and urea and silicon carbide were weighed in a weight ratio of 10:90. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0063] Example 10: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silica (AEROSIL 50, manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd.) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 90:10. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0064] Example 11: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silica (AEROSIL 50, manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd.) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0065] Example 12: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silica (AEROSIL 50, manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd.) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 50:50. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0066] Example 13: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silica (AEROSIL 50, manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd.) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 30:70. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0067] Example 14: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silica (AEROSIL 50, manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd.) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 10:90. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0068] Example 15: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silica (AEROSIL OX50, manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd.) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0069] Example 16: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silica (AEROSIL 130, manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd.) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0070] Example 17: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silica (Rheorosil CP-102, manufactured by Tokuyama Corporation) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0071] Example 18: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silica (RheoroSeal QS-102, manufactured by Tokuyama Corporation) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0072] Example 19: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that silica (Tokuyama Corporation, Rheoroseal QS-30) was used instead of silicon carbide (Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0073] Example 20: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that carbon black (Cancarb, THERMAX N990) was used instead of silicon carbide (Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and carbon black were weighed in a weight ratio of 90:10. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0074] Example 21: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that carbon black (Cancarb, THERMAX N990) was used instead of silicon carbide (Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and carbon black were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0075] Example 22: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that carbon black (Cancarb, THERMAX N990) was used instead of silicon carbide (Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and carbon black were weighed in a weight ratio of 50:50. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0076] Example 23: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that carbon black (Cancarb, THERMAX N990) was used instead of silicon carbide (Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and carbon black were weighed in a weight ratio of 30:70. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0077] Example 24: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that carbon black (Cancarb, THERMAX N990) was used instead of silicon carbide (Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support, and urea and carbon black were weighed in a weight ratio of 10:90. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0078] Example 25: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that alumina (AKP-G07, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.) was used as the support instead of silicon carbide (02071, Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd.), and urea and alumina were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0079] Example 26: Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that titania (Sakai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., R-5N) was used as the support instead of silicon carbide (Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071), and urea and titania were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0080] In Example 27, 1,3-diphenylguanidine (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., melting point 147°C, specific gravity 1.13) was used instead of urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335) as the ammonia-generating compound, and silicon carbide (manufactured by Nanomakers, NMSiC99) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support. Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that 1,3-diphenylguanidine and silicon carbide were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20. The weight loss rate of 1,3-diphenylguanidine was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0081] In Example 28, 1,3-diphenylguanidine (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., melting point 147°C, specific gravity 1.13) was used as the ammonia-generating compound instead of urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335), and silicon carbide (manufactured by Nanomakers, NMSiC99) was used as the support instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071). Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that 1,3-diphenylguanidine and silicon carbide were weighed in a weight ratio of 70:30. The weight loss rate of 1,3-diphenylguanidine was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0082] In Example 29, 1,3-diphenylguanidine (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., melting point 147°C, specific gravity 1.13) was used instead of urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335) as the ammonia-generating compound, and silicon carbide (manufactured by Nanomakers, NMSiC99) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support. Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that 1,3-diphenylguanidine and silicon carbide were weighed in a weight ratio of 50:50. The weight loss rate of 1,3-diphenylguanidine was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0083] In Example 30, 1,3-diphenylguanidine (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., melting point 147°C, specific gravity 1.13) was used instead of urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335) as the ammonia-generating compound, and silicon carbide (manufactured by Nanomakers, NMSiC99) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support. Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that 1,3-diphenylguanidine and silicon carbide were weighed in a weight ratio of 20:80. The weight loss rate of 1,3-diphenylguanidine was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0084] In Example 31, 1,3-diphenylguanidine (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., melting point 147°C, specific gravity 1.13) was used instead of urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335) as the ammonia-generating compound, and silicon carbide (manufactured by Nanomakers, NMSiC99) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support. Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that 1,3-diphenylguanidine and silicon carbide were weighed in a weight ratio of 10:90. The weight loss rate of 1,3-diphenylguanidine was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0085] In Example 32, ammonium chloride (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., melting point 338°C, specific gravity 1.53) was used instead of urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335) as the ammonia-generating compound, and silica (manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd., AEROSIL 50) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support. Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that ammonium chloride and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 80:20, and the weight loss rate of ammonium chloride was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0086] In Example 33, ammonium chloride (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., melting point 338°C, specific gravity 1.53) was used instead of urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335) as the ammonia-generating compound, and silica (manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd., AEROSIL 50) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support. Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that ammonium chloride and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 50:50. The weight loss rate of ammonium chloride was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0087] In Example 34, ammonium chloride (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., melting point 338°C, specific gravity 1.53) was used instead of urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335) as the ammonia-generating compound, and silica (manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd., AEROSIL 50) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support. Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that ammonium chloride and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 20:80, and the weight loss rate of ammonium chloride was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0088] In Example 35, ammonium chloride (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., melting point 338°C, specific gravity 1.53) was used instead of urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335) as the ammonia-generating compound, and silica (manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd., AEROSIL 50) was used instead of silicon carbide (manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071) as the support. Composite particles were prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that ammonium chloride and silica were weighed in a weight ratio of 10:90, and the weight loss rate of ammonium chloride was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0089] Comparative Example 1: Urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335) as an ammonia-generating compound and silicon carbide (manufactured by Nanomakers, NMSiC99) as a support were weighed in a 10:90 ratio and placed in a polyethylene bag. The polyethylene bag was then shaken to mix the compounds. The weight loss rate of the urea was measured when the mixed particles were heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0090] Comparative Example 2: Mixed particles were prepared in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1, except that urea and silicon carbide were weighed in a weight ratio of 30:70. The weight loss rate of urea was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes. Furthermore, the separation state in perfluorohexane was confirmed.
[0091] Comparative Example 3: The weight loss rate of urea (manufactured by Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335) was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes.
[0092] Comparative Example 4: The weight loss rate of 1,3-diphenylguanidine (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., melting point 147°C, specific gravity 1.13) was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes.
[0093] Comparative Example 5: The weight loss rate of ammonium chloride (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., melting point 338°C, specific gravity 1.53) was measured when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes.
[0094] Table 1 shows the weight loss rate of the ammonia-generating compound and the separation state in perfluorohexane when heated at 180°C for 30 minutes in each example and comparative example. The content of each component in the composite particles of Examples 1 and 2 was determined by Rietveld analysis. Aeris, manufactured by Spectris Corporation, was used for the Rietveld analysis. From Table 1, it was confirmed that the particles produced by the thermal plasma method and the mechanical particle composite method showed a greater weight loss rate of the ammonia-generating compound and a greater amount of ammonia generation compared to the particles mixed in a bag or the ammonia-generating compound alone. Furthermore, separation of the ammonia-generating compound and the carrier was not observed in perfluorohexane for the particles produced by the thermal plasma method and the mechanical particle composite method, but separation was observed for the particles mixed in a bag.
[0095] The physical properties of each component listed in Table 1 are shown below.
[0096] Ammonia-generating compounds: Urea: Melting point 132-136°C, specific gravity 1.335; 1,3-Diphenylguanidine: Melting point 147°C, specific gravity 1.13; Ammonium chloride: Melting point 338°C, specific gravity 1.53
[0097] Silicon carbide carrier (1): Manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02071, BET specific surface area 71 m² 2 / g Silicon carbide (2): Manufactured by Nisshin Engineering Co., Ltd., 02271, BET specific surface area 75 m² 2 / g Silicon carbide (3): Nanomakers, NMSiC99, BET specific surface area 55 m² 2 / g Silica (1): Manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd., AEROSIL 50, BET specific surface area 50 m² 2 / g Silica (2): Manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd., AEROSIL OX50, BET specific surface area 50 m² 2 / g Silica (3): Manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd., AEROSIL 130, BET specific surface area 130 m² 2 / g Silica (4): Tokuyama Corporation, Rheoroseal CP-102, BET specific surface area 200 m² 2 / g Silica (5): Tokuyama Corporation, Rheoroseal QS-102, BET specific surface area 200 m²2 / g Silica (6): Tokuyama Corporation, Rheoroseal QS-30BET, specific surface area 300 m² 2 / g Carbon Black: Made by Cancarb, THERMAX N990, BET specific surface area 7m² 2 / g Alumina: Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., AKP-G07, BET specific surface area 80 m² 2 / g Titania: Manufactured by Sakai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., R-5N, BET specific surface area 17 m² 2 / g
[0098]
[0099] 11. Perfluorohexane 12. Carrier particles 13. Ammonia-generating compounds 14. Particles
Claims
1. A composite particle in which an ammonia-generating compound is supported on a carrier, wherein the carrier is at least one selected from the group consisting of silicon carbide, alumina, titania, silica, zirconia, ceria, silica-alumina, calcia, magnesia, and carbon black, and the ammonia-generating compound is a compound that generates ammonia upon heating, is insoluble in perfluorohexane, and has a specific gravity less than that of perfluorohexane at 20°C.
2. The composite particles according to claim 1, wherein the amount of ammonia generated when the composite particles are heated at 180°C for 30 minutes is 1.1 times or more the amount of ammonia generated when only the ammonia-generating compound is heated at 180°C for 30 minutes.
3. The composite particle according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the content of the ammonia-generating compound in the composite particle is 1% by mass or more with respect to the total mass of the ammonia-generating compound and the carrier.
4. The composite particle according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the ammonia generation temperature of the composite particle is 70 to 300°C.
5. The composite particle according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the melting point of the ammonia-generating compound is 100 to 350°C.
6. The composite particle according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the ammonia-generating compound is at least one selected from urea, acetylurea, biuret, inorganic ammonium salts, N-phenylbenzamidine, and guanidines.
7. The BET specific surface area of the carrier is 5 to 300 m². 2 The composite particles according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the particle size is / g.
8. A composite particle according to any one of claims 1 to 7, obtained by a manufacturing method in which the ammonia-generating compound is supported on the carrier using a thermal plasma method, an impregnation support method, or a mechanical particle composite method.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Sustained release porous fine particle and method for producing the same
JP2003286196A
Decomposing catalyst for urea, and exhaust gas denitrification method and apparatus using the catalyst
JP2006223937A
Method for decomposing ammonia and ruthenium complex
WO2019168094A1
Composition, crosslinked product, and sealing material
WO2023189547A1