Architectural design dynamic process management method and system

Abstract

The invention is suitable for the technical field of architectural design process management, provides an architectural design dynamic process management method and system, and realizes remarkable optimization of a drawing review process through intelligent comparison and priority ranking of architectural construction drawings. The method comprises the following steps: firstly, acquiring a specified construction blueprint of a target building and a building construction primary drawing submitted by each corresponding construction participation unit, and combining with a selected revised drawing, so that the system can automatically evaluate the matching degree of the drawings of each unit; the cumulative calculation of the matching degree provides a clear basis for subsequent sorting, and the generated first priority set enables units with high drawing quality to be recognized preferentially.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of building design process management, and particularly relates to a method and system for dynamic process management of building design. Background Technique

[0002] In building design and construction projects, construction drawings are a key link in project execution, running through the entire process of project design, approval, and construction. Construction drawings are usually submitted by design units or participating construction units and are reviewed by various functional departments to ensure that the drawings meet design specifications and project requirements. The qualified reviewed drawings are then used to guide construction operations, directly affecting the implementation effect and progress of the project. Therefore, the submission, review, and feedback of drawings are important contents in building project management. Especially in large-scale complex projects, the review efficiency of drawings is directly related to the construction progress and project cost.

[0003] However, in the existing drawing review process, reviewers usually need to process multiple drawings submitted by different participating construction units. Without scientific sorting, the review process is often linear or manually arranged, lacking comprehensive consideration of drawing quality and response speed. Reviewers often process drawings in the order of submission time or sequence, failing to prioritize the review of more accurate and timely drawings. This unscientific review order leads to low review efficiency and may even cause high-quality drawings to be reviewed late, affecting the overall progress of the project. At the same time, for low-quality or late-submitted drawings, due to the unreasonable arrangement of the review order, reviewers may spend more time on these drawings, further reducing the review efficiency. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method and system for dynamic process management of building design, aiming to solve the problems raised in the background technique.

[0005] The present invention is implemented as follows. A method for dynamic process management of building design, the method includes:

[0006] Obtain the selected revised drawings corresponding to the specified construction blueprints of the target building, and collect the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing;

[0007] Analyze the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, evaluate their matching degree values, and accumulate the matching degree values of each participating construction unit. Sort all participating construction units according to the accumulated matching degree values to generate a first priority set;

[0008] Evaluate the response speed index of each participating unit in the first priority set for the specified construction blueprint in sequence, adjust the corresponding cumulative matching degree value according to the response speed index, and then re - sort according to the adjusted cumulative matching degree value to generate the second priority set;

[0009] According to the second priority set, determine the review priority order of the initial construction drawings submitted by each subsequent participating unit, and optimize the sequence of the review process.

[0010] As a further limitation of the technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention, the steps of analyzing the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, evaluating its matching degree value, and accumulating the matching degree values of each participating unit, and sorting all participating units according to the accumulated matching degree value to generate the first priority set include:

[0011] Analyze the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, perform an intelligent comparison between the initial construction drawings and the specified construction blueprint, evaluate the degree of coincidence between the initial construction drawings of each participating unit and the selected revised drawing, and generate the matching degree value of each initial construction drawing;

[0012] Accumulate the matching degree values of the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating unit, and synthesize the matching degree values of each copy of the initial construction drawings of the same participating unit into an accumulated matching degree value;

[0013] Sort all participating units according to the accumulated matching degree value of each participating unit to generate the first priority set.

[0014] As a further limitation of the technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention, the steps of evaluating the response speed index of each participating unit in the first priority set for the specified construction blueprint in sequence, adjusting the corresponding cumulative matching degree value according to the response speed index, and then re - sorting according to the adjusted cumulative matching degree value to generate the second priority set include:

[0015] Evaluate the response speed index of each participating unit in the first priority set for the specified construction blueprint in sequence;

[0016] Multiply the cumulative matching degree value of each participating unit by its corresponding response speed index to calculate the adjusted cumulative matching degree value;

[0017] Re - sort all participating units according to the adjusted cumulative matching degree value to generate the second priority set.

[0018] As a further limitation of the technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention, the steps of evaluating the response speed index of each participating unit in the first priority set for the specified construction blueprint in sequence include:

[0019] Collect the response time of each participating unit in the first priority set for the initial version of the construction drawings submitted each time for the selected revised drawings;

[0020] Calculate the average value of the response times of each participating unit in all submissions to obtain its average response time;

[0021] Compare the average response time of each participating unit with the predetermined submission time limit and calculate its response speed index.

[0022] As a further limitation of the technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention, the predetermined submission time limit refers to the deadline for the participating unit to submit the initial version of the construction drawings within the specified time after receiving the selected revised drawings according to the project plan and contract requirements. This time limit is set according to the complexity of the project, progress requirements, scope of design modifications, and industry standards.

[0023] An architectural design dynamic process management system, the system includes: a data collection module, a first priority set generation module, a second priority set generation module, and a review process optimization module, where:

[0024] The data collection module is used to obtain the selected revised drawings corresponding to the specified construction blueprints of the target building and collect the initial versions of the construction drawings submitted by each participating unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing;

[0025] The first priority set generation module is used to analyze the initial versions of the construction drawings submitted by each participating unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, evaluate its matching degree value, accumulate the matching degree values of each participating unit, and sort all participating units according to the accumulated matching degree values to generate a first priority set;

[0026] The second priority set generation module is used to sequentially evaluate the response speed index of each participating unit in the first priority set for the specified construction blueprints, adjust the corresponding accumulated matching degree values according to the response speed index, and re-sort according to the adjusted accumulated matching degree values to generate a second priority set;

[0027] The review process optimization module is used to determine the review priority order of the initial versions of the construction drawings submitted by each subsequent participating unit according to the second priority set and optimize the sequence of the review process.

[0028] As a further limitation of the technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention, the first priority set generation module specifically includes:

[0029] A matching degree value generation unit, which is used to analyze the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, intelligently compare the initial construction drawings with the specified construction blueprint, evaluate the coincidence degree between the initial construction drawings of each participating construction unit and the selected revised drawing, and generate the matching degree value of each initial construction drawing;

[0030] An accumulated matching degree value determination unit, which is used to accumulate the matching degree values of the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit, and synthesize the matching degree values of each initial construction drawing of the same participating construction unit into an accumulated matching degree value;

[0031] A first priority set generation unit, which is used to sort all participating construction units according to the accumulated matching degree value of each participating construction unit, and generate a first priority set.

[0032] As a further limitation of the technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention, the second priority set generation module specifically includes:

[0033] A response speed index evaluation unit, which is used to sequentially evaluate the response speed index of each participating construction unit in the first priority set to the specified construction blueprint;

[0034] An accumulated matching degree value adjustment unit, which is used to multiply the accumulated matching degree value of each participating construction unit by its corresponding response speed index to calculate the adjusted accumulated matching degree value;

[0035] A second priority set generation unit, which is used to re-sort all participating construction units according to the adjusted accumulated matching degree value, and generate a second priority set.

[0036] As a further limitation of the technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention, the second priority set generation module specifically further includes:

[0037] A response time determination unit, which is used to collect the response time of each participating construction unit in the first priority set for each initial construction drawing submitted for the selected revised drawing;

[0038] An average response time calculation unit, which is used to calculate the average value of the response times of each participating construction unit in all submissions to obtain its average response time;

[0039] A response speed index calculation unit, which is used to compare the average response time of each participating construction unit with a predetermined submission time limit, and calculate its response speed index.

[0040] As a further limitation of the technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention, the predetermined submission time limit refers to the deadline for the participating units to submit the initial version of the construction drawings within the specified time after receiving the selected revised drawings according to the project plan and contract requirements. This time limit is set according to the complexity of the project, progress requirements, scope of design modifications, and industry standards.

[0041] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0042] Through the intelligent comparison and priority ranking of construction drawings, the drawing review process has been significantly optimized. First, by obtaining the specified construction blueprints of the target building and the initial versions of the construction drawings submitted by each participating unit, and combining with the selected revised drawings, the system can automatically evaluate the matching degree of each unit's drawings. The cumulative calculation of the matching degree provides a clear basis for subsequent ranking, and the generated first priority set enables units with high-quality drawings to be identified first.

[0043] Subsequently, the response speed index is introduced as a second dimension for comprehensive evaluation, incorporating the timeliness of the participating units' responses into the review priority ranking. By adjusting the matching degree values and re-ranking to generate the second priority set, the dual considerations of drawing quality and submission timeliness are ensured. This secondary ranking method greatly optimizes the order of drawing review, enabling high-quality and quickly responsive drawings to enter the review process first, thereby reducing the time waste caused by low-quality drawings.

[0044] Through the present invention, the drawing review process has been greatly simplified and accelerated, effectively improving the review efficiency and reducing the burden of manual screening and judgment. At the same time, this technical solution promotes competition among participating units, motivating them to improve the quality and response efficiency of drawing submissions, thus providing strong support for the overall project progress control and quality assurance. Overall, the present invention optimizes the drawing review process of construction projects, significantly improving work efficiency and project management level. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0045] Figure 1 It is a flowchart of the method provided by the embodiment of the present invention;

[0046] Figure 2 It is a flowchart of generating the first priority set in the method provided by the embodiment of the present invention;

[0047] Figure 3 It is a flowchart of generating the second priority set in the method provided by the embodiment of the present invention;

[0048] Figure 4 It is a flowchart of evaluating the response speed index in the method provided by the embodiment of the present invention;

[0049] Figure 5It is the application architecture diagram of the system provided by the embodiment of the present invention;

[0050] Figure 6 It is the structural block diagram of the first priority set generation module in the system provided by the embodiment of the present invention;

[0051] Figure 7 It is the structural block diagram of the second priority set generation module in the system provided by the embodiment of the present invention. Detailed implementation manners

[0052] In order to make the objectives, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention clearer, the present invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present invention and are not used to limit the present invention.

[0053] It can be understood that the terms "first", "second", etc. used in the present application can be used in this article to describe various elements, but unless otherwise specified, these elements are not limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish the first element from another element. For example, without departing from the scope of the present application, the first xx script can be called the second xx script, and similarly, the second xx script can be called the first xx script.

[0054] Figure 1 It shows the flowchart of the method provided by the embodiment of the present invention.

[0055] Specifically, a method for dynamic process management of building design, the method specifically includes the following steps:

[0056] Step S100, obtain the selected revised drawings corresponding to the specified construction blueprints of the target building, and collect the initial building construction drawings submitted by each participating unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing.

[0057] In the embodiment of the present invention, the target building refers to a specific building that is under construction or planning in the entire project; it is the central object of construction and design. The specified construction blueprints are key design drawings set for the target building, covering the main structure, layout, functional requirements, etc. of the building, and are used to guide the overall construction plan. The selected revised drawings are necessary modifications or adjustments to the specified construction blueprints, usually provided by the design team or relevant functional departments according to the actual situation to update and improve the original design plan.

[0058] In the specific implementation process, first, the system automatically obtains the specified construction blueprints of the target building through a Building Information Modeling (BIM) platform or a project management system. Then, through the revision records in the platform or the project database, the selected revised drawings for these blueprints are obtained. These revised drawings contain the latest design adjustments, usually released by the design unit or functional departments according to project requirements.

[0059] Meanwhile, the system automatically collects the initial construction drawings corresponding to each selected revised drawing from the submission records of each participating construction unit. Participating construction units usually submit the corresponding initial construction drawings based on the latest design modifications after receiving the revision requirements. The system classifies these drawings under the corresponding revised documents according to the submission time of the participating construction units and the matching situation of the revised drawings for subsequent comparison and evaluation.

[0060] Furthermore, the dynamic process management method for building design further includes the following steps:

[0061] Step S200, analyze the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, evaluate their matching degree values, accumulate the matching degree values of each participating construction unit, and sort all participating construction units according to the accumulated matching degree values to generate a first priority set.

[0062] Specifically, Figure 2 shows the flowchart for generating the first priority set.

[0063] Among them, analyzing the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, evaluating their matching degree values, accumulating the matching degree values of each participating construction unit, and sorting all participating construction units according to the accumulated matching degree values to generate a first priority set specifically includes the following steps:

[0064] Step S201, analyze the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, perform an intelligent comparison between the initial construction drawings and the specified construction blueprints, evaluate the degree of coincidence between the initial construction drawings of each participating construction unit and the selected revised drawing, and generate the matching degree value of each initial construction drawing.

[0065] Step S202, accumulate the matching degree values of the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit, and synthesize the matching degree values of each copy of the initial construction drawings of the same participating construction unit into an accumulated matching degree value.

[0066] Step S203, sort all participating construction units according to the accumulated matching degree value of each participating construction unit to generate a first priority set.

[0067] In an embodiment of the present invention, the process of intelligently comparing the preliminary drawings of the building construction with the designated construction blueprints relies on the combination of the building information model (BIM) platform and the drawing comparison algorithm. BIM technology can provide complete three-dimensional design data, and supports version control and change tracking, ensuring that the system can obtain the latest revised drawings and preliminary drawings. Through the drawing comparison algorithm (such as technology based on computer vision and geometric analysis), the differences between the preliminary drawings of the building construction and the designated construction blueprints can be automatically identified, including changes in structure, size, design details, etc. In addition, parametric design tools such as Dynamo or Grasshopper can also help analyze and automatically adjust the architectural design model to quickly evaluate the matching degree of the revised drawings. Finally, the system generates a matching degree value for each preliminary drawing of the building construction, which reflects the degree of fit between the preliminary drawing and the revised drawing.

[0068] After the matching evaluation, the system will summarize the preliminary drawings of all participating units and accumulate the matching values ​​of each participating unit to obtain the comprehensive matching of each unit. The system sorts the participating units according to the cumulative matching degree and generates the first priority set. The significance of this set is that it can help reviewers give priority to those drawings that are submitted with high quality and meet the revision requirements, thereby speeding up the review process and reducing unnecessary work caused by low-quality drawings. At the same time, this sorting can also help project managers identify the most reliable participating units so that they can give more trust and resource allocation in subsequent cooperation. This priority sorting can greatly improve the efficiency of drawing review and the quality control of the overall project.

[0069] Furthermore, the architectural design dynamic process management method further comprises the following steps:

[0070] Step S300, sequentially evaluate the response speed index of each construction unit in the first priority set to the specified construction blueprint, adjust the corresponding cumulative matching value according to the response speed index, and then re-sort according to the adjusted cumulative matching value to generate a second priority set.

[0071] Specifically, Figure 3 A flowchart for generating a second priority set is shown.

[0072] The following steps are specifically included in the process of evaluating the response speed index of each construction unit in the first priority set to the specified construction blueprint, adjusting the corresponding cumulative matching value according to the response speed index, and re-ranking according to the adjusted cumulative matching value to generate the second priority set:

[0073] Step S301, sequentially evaluating the response speed index of each construction unit in the first priority set to a designated construction blueprint;

[0074] In step S302, multiply the cumulative matching degree values of each participating construction unit by their corresponding response speed indexes to calculate the adjusted cumulative matching degree values.

[0075] In step S303, re - sort all participating construction units according to the adjusted cumulative matching degree values to generate a second priority set.

[0076] In the embodiment of the present invention, multiplying the cumulative matching degree values of each participating construction unit by their corresponding response speed indexes aims to combine the matching quality of the drawings with the response efficiency of the participating construction units for evaluation. The basis for this adjustment is that not only the accuracy and quality of the drawings themselves are relied on, but also the speed and timeliness of the participating construction units when submitting the drawings need to be considered. The response speed index, as a standard for measuring the timeliness of the participating construction units in submitting the drawings, can more comprehensively reflect the comprehensive performance of the participating construction units in the actual project implementation by combining the matching degree with the response speed. In this way, both the drawing quality can be guaranteed and the project progress can be ensured not to be delayed. The application of the dual criteria makes the evaluation results more scientific and comprehensive.

[0077] The advantage of this secondary adjustment method is that it can more effectively distinguish the participating construction units that can not only provide high - quality drawings but also quickly respond to the requirements of design revisions. Relying solely on the matching degree may ignore the performance of some units in terms of response speed, while relying solely on the response speed may also cover up the drawing quality problems. Therefore, multiplying the matching degree by the response speed index for adjustment can help managers better balance the dual requirements of quality and efficiency. This method is of great significance for ensuring project progress control and overall execution effect, especially in large - scale projects, which can reduce the risk of schedule delays caused by slow response.

[0078] Compared with the original single - matching - degree sorting method, this priority sorting method combined with the response speed can further help project managers identify the participating construction units that perform the best in terms of drawing quality and submission efficiency. This not only improves the efficiency of the drawing review process but also provides a clear basis for subsequent cooperation, ensuring that resource allocation is tilted towards the most reliable and efficient participating construction units. Through this improvement, project managers can more reasonably adjust resource and task allocation, further enhancing the overall project quality control and execution effect.

[0079] Specifically, Figure 4 shows a flowchart for evaluating the response speed index.

[0080] Among them, sequentially evaluating the response speed indexes of each participating construction unit in the first priority set for a specified construction blueprint specifically includes the following steps:

[0081] Step S3011: Collect the response times of each participating unit in the first priority set for each initial version of the construction drawings submitted in response to the selected revised drawings.

[0082] Step S3012: Calculate the average value of the response times of each participating unit in all submissions to obtain its average response time.

[0083] Step S3013: Compare the average response time of each participating unit with the predetermined submission deadline and calculate its response speed index.

[0084] The predetermined submission deadline refers to the final deadline for a participating unit to submit the initial version of the construction drawings within a specified time after receiving the selected revised drawings, in accordance with the project plan and contract requirements. This deadline is set according to the complexity of the project, schedule requirements, scope of design modifications, and industry standards.

[0085] In the embodiment of the present invention, the system automatically collects the response times of each participating unit in the first priority set for each initial version of the construction drawings submitted in response to the selected revised drawings through a building information management platform (such as BIM) or a project management system. The time data of each drawing submission is recorded for subsequent calculation.

[0086] Next, the system calculates the average of all submission response times of each participating unit to obtain its average response time. This average value is used to measure the overall response efficiency of the participating unit during multiple submissions, thereby avoiding the influence of occasional overly long or short response times on the results.

[0087] Finally, the system compares the average response time of each participating unit with the pre-set submission deadline of the project. The response speed index is calculated through this comparison and is usually expressed as a percentage. The specific calculation method is to use the predetermined submission deadline as the benchmark. When the average response time of the participating unit is less than or equal to the submission deadline, the response speed index approaches 100%; if the response time exceeds the predetermined deadline, the index decreases accordingly. Conversely, if the unit submission time is faster than the predetermined deadline, the response speed index may exceed 100%.

[0088] This calculation process can be carried out with the help of existing algorithms and data analysis tools (such as the data processing library Pandas in Python, or specialized project management software tools). The system will automatically process the recorded time data and calculate the response speed index through a simple formula in combination with the predetermined deadline, ensuring the efficiency and accuracy of this process.

[0089] Furthermore, the dynamic process management method for building design further includes the following steps:

[0090] Step S400: Determine the review priority order of the initial construction drawings submitted by each subsequent participating unit according to the second priority set, and optimize the sequence of the review process.

[0091] In the embodiment of the present invention, the system will apply the result of comprehensively considering the response speed and drawing matching degree to the review process according to the ranking of the participating units in the second priority set. The system will automatically adjust the review queue and give priority to reviewing the drawings submitted by those participating units with high cumulative matching degree and fast response speed.

[0092] This process is implemented through a BIM platform or a project management system. These platforms can track the drawing submission records, response times, and matching degree scores of participating units, and then automatically generate an optimized review order for drawing review. Functional departments or project management teams can quickly find the drawings to be reviewed first according to this order, avoiding inefficient manual screening. The review order of each drawing will be based on the comprehensive performance (quality and efficiency) of the unit, so as to ensure that high-quality drawings can be quickly identified and reviewed first.

[0093] The implementation of this technical solution has a significant impact on practical applications. First of all, it greatly optimizes the work process of drawing review. By giving priority to reviewing high-quality and timely submitted drawings, it saves the time of reviewers and reduces unnecessary repetitive work. Secondly, this mechanism promotes positive competition among participating units, encouraging each unit to not only improve the quality of the submitted drawings but also increase its response speed to ensure that the project progress is not delayed.

[0094] Finally, the optimized review order contributes to the overall construction progress of the project, because timely review and confirmation of high-quality drawings can ensure that the construction progresses according to the plan, reducing construction rework or schedule delays caused by drawing errors or review delays. This optimization solution improves the efficiency of project management and the accuracy of drawing review, thus providing strong support for the successful implementation of the entire construction project.

[0095] In summary, based on the implementation of all the above technical solutions, the beneficial effects are significant and multi-dimensional. First of all, through intelligent drawing comparison and automated matching degree evaluation, the system can quickly screen out the initial construction drawings that meet the revision requirements, reducing errors and repetitive labor in manual review. Secondly, by combining the response speed index, the participating units that attach equal importance to quality and efficiency are prioritized, optimizing the review sequence of drawings and greatly improving the overall efficiency of the drawing review process.

[0096] This comprehensive evaluation method not only improves the work efficiency of reviewers, but also effectively shortens the review cycle of the project, ensuring that the project progress can be promoted on time. At the same time, the combination of response speed and matching degree promotes the competition among participating construction units, encouraging them to continuously improve the quality of drawings and the timeliness of submissions. This technical solution helps to reduce the risk of project rework and the construction period delay caused by delayed review, thereby significantly improving the overall quality control and management level of construction projects.

[0097] Furthermore, Figure 5 The application architecture diagram of the system provided by the embodiment of the present invention is shown.

[0098] Among them, in another preferred embodiment provided by the present invention, an architectural design dynamic process management system includes:

[0099] A data collection module 100, configured to obtain selected revised drawings corresponding to the specified construction blueprints of the target building, and collect the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing.

[0100] In the embodiment of the present invention, the target building refers to a specific building that is under construction or planning in the entire project; it is the central object of construction and design. The specified construction blueprints are key design drawings set for the target building, covering the main structure, layout, functional requirements, etc. of the building, and are used to guide the overall construction plan. The selected revised drawings are necessary modifications or adjustments to the specified construction blueprints, usually provided by the design team or relevant functional departments according to the actual situation to update and improve the original design scheme.

[0101] In the specific implementation process, first, the system will automatically obtain the specified construction blueprints of the target building through the Building Information Modeling (BIM) platform or the project management system. Then, through the revision records in the platform or the project database, the selected revised drawings for these blueprints are obtained. These revised drawings contain the latest design adjustment contents, usually released by the design unit or functional department according to the project requirements.

[0102] At the same time, the system will automatically collect the initial construction drawings corresponding to each selected revised drawing from the submission records of each participating construction unit. Participating construction units usually submit the corresponding initial construction drawings based on the latest design modifications after receiving the revision requirements. The system classifies these drawings under the corresponding revision files according to the submission time of the participating construction units and the matching situation of the revised drawings for subsequent comparison and evaluation.

[0103] Furthermore, the architectural design dynamic process management system further includes:

[0104] The first priority set generation module 200 is configured to parse the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, evaluate their matching degree values, accumulate the matching degree values of each participating construction unit, sort all the participating construction units according to the accumulated matching degree values, and generate a first priority set.

[0105] Specifically, Figure 6 FIG. 5 shows a structural block diagram of the first priority set generation module 200 in the system provided by the embodiment of the present invention.

[0106] Among them, in the preferred embodiment provided by the present invention, the first priority set generation module 200 specifically includes:

[0107] The matching degree value generation unit 201 is configured to parse the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, perform intelligent comparison between the initial construction drawings and the specified construction blueprints, evaluate the coincidence degree between the initial construction drawings of each participating construction unit and the selected revised drawing, and generate the matching degree value of each initial construction drawing;

[0108] The cumulative matching degree value determination unit 202 is configured to accumulate the matching degree values of the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit, and synthesize the matching degree values of each initial construction drawing of the same participating construction unit into a cumulative matching degree value;

[0109] The first priority set generation unit 203 is configured to sort all the participating construction units according to the cumulative matching degree values of each participating construction unit, and generate a first priority set.

[0110] In the embodiment of the present invention, the process of performing intelligent comparison between the initial construction drawings and the specified construction blueprints depends on the combination of a building information model (BIM) platform and a drawing comparison algorithm. The BIM technology can provide complete three-dimensional design data and support version control and change tracking to ensure that the system can obtain the latest revised drawings and initial drawings. Through the drawing comparison algorithm (such as technology based on computer vision and geometric analysis), the difference points between the initial construction drawings and the specified construction blueprints can be automatically identified, including changes in aspects such as structure, dimensions, and design details. In addition, parametric design tools such as Dynamo or Grasshopper can also help analyze and automatically adjust the building design model to quickly evaluate the matching degree of the revised drawings. Finally, the system generates the matching degree value of each initial construction drawing, and this value reflects the coincidence degree between the initial drawing and the revised drawing.

[0111] After the matching degree evaluation, the system will summarize the initial version of the drawings of all participating construction units, accumulate the matching degree values of each participating construction unit, and obtain the comprehensive matching degree of each unit. The system sorts the participating construction units according to the accumulated matching degree to generate the first priority set. The significance of this set is that it can help the reviewers prioritize the processing of the drawings that are of high quality and meet the revision requirements, thus speeding up the review process and reducing the unnecessary work brought by low-quality drawings. At the same time, this kind of sorting can also help the project managers identify the most reliable participating construction units, so as to give more trust and resource allocation in subsequent cooperation. This priority sorting can greatly improve the efficiency of drawing review and the quality control of the overall project.

[0112] Further, the building design dynamic process management system further includes:

[0113] A second priority set generation module 300, configured to sequentially evaluate the response speed indexes of each participating construction unit in the first priority set for the specified construction blueprint, adjust the corresponding accumulated matching degree values according to the response speed indexes, and then re-sort according to the adjusted accumulated matching degree values to generate a second priority set.

[0114] Specifically, Figure 7 FIG. shows the structural block diagram of the second priority set generation module 300 in the system provided by the embodiment of the present invention.

[0115] Among them, in the preferred embodiment provided by the present invention, the second priority set generation module 300 specifically includes:

[0116] A response speed index evaluation unit 301, configured to sequentially evaluate the response speed indexes of each participating construction unit in the first priority set for the specified construction blueprint;

[0117] An accumulated matching degree value adjustment unit 302, configured to multiply the accumulated matching degree value of each participating construction unit by its corresponding response speed index to calculate the adjusted accumulated matching degree value;

[0118] A second priority set generation unit 303, configured to re-sort all participating construction units according to the adjusted accumulated matching degree values to generate a second priority set;

[0119] A response time determination unit 304, configured to collect the response time of each participating construction unit in the first priority set for each time the initial version of the building construction drawing submitted for the selected revised drawing;

[0120] An average response time calculation unit 305, configured to calculate the average value of the response times of each participating construction unit in all submissions to obtain its average response time;

[0121] The response speed index calculation unit 306 is used to compare the average response time of each participating unit with the predetermined submission deadline and calculate its response speed index.

[0122] The predetermined submission deadline refers to the final deadline for a participating unit to submit the initial version of the construction drawings within a specified time after receiving the selected revised drawings, in accordance with the project plan and contract requirements. This deadline is set based on the complexity of the project, progress requirements, scope of design modifications, and industry standards.

[0123] In the embodiment of the present invention, multiplying the cumulative matching degree value of each participating unit by its corresponding response speed index aims to evaluate by combining the matching quality of the drawings with the response efficiency of the participating units. The basis for this adjustment is that not only the accuracy and quality of the drawings themselves are relied on, but also the speed and timeliness of the participating units when submitting the drawings need to be considered. As a standard for measuring the timeliness of a participating unit in submitting drawings, by combining the matching degree with the response speed, the response speed index can more comprehensively reflect the comprehensive performance of the participating unit in the actual project execution. In this way, both the quality of the drawings can be guaranteed and the project progress can be ensured not to be delayed. The application of the dual criteria makes the evaluation result more scientific and comprehensive.

[0124] The advantage of this secondary adjustment method is that it can more effectively distinguish the participating units that can not only provide high-quality drawings but also quickly respond to the requirements of design revisions. Relying solely on the matching degree may ignore the performance of some units in terms of response speed, while relying solely on the response speed may also cover up the drawing quality problems. Therefore, multiplying the matching degree by the response speed index for adjustment can help managers better balance the dual needs of quality and efficiency. This method is of great significance for ensuring the project progress control and overall execution effect. Especially in large projects, it can reduce the risk of progress delays caused by slow response.

[0125] Compared with the original single matching degree ranking method, this priority ranking combined with the response speed can further help project managers identify the participating units that perform the best in terms of drawing quality and submission efficiency. This not only improves the efficiency of the drawing review process but also provides a clear basis for subsequent cooperation, ensuring that resource allocation is tilted towards the most reliable and efficient participating units. Through this improvement, project managers can more reasonably adjust resource and task allocation, further enhancing the overall project quality control and execution effect.

[0126] The system automatically collects the response time of each participating unit in the first priority set for each submission of the initial version of the construction drawings for the selected revised drawings through a building information management platform (such as BIM) or a project management system. The time data of each drawing submission is recorded for subsequent calculation.

[0127] Next, the system calculates the average of all the submission response times of each participating unit to obtain its average response time. This average value is used to measure the overall response efficiency of the participating units during multiple submissions, thus avoiding the influence of occasional overly long or short response times on the results.

[0128] Finally, the system compares the average response time of each participating unit with the preset submission time limit of the project. The response speed index is calculated through this comparison and is usually expressed as a percentage. The specific calculation method is to use the preset submission time limit as the benchmark. When the average response time of the participating unit is less than or equal to the submission time limit, the response speed index is close to 100%; if the response time exceeds the preset time limit, the index will decrease accordingly. Conversely, if the unit's submission time is faster than the preset time limit, the response speed index may exceed 100%.

[0129] This calculation process can be carried out with the help of existing algorithms and data analysis tools (such as the data processing library Pandas in Python, or specialized project management software tools). The system will automatically process the recorded time data and calculate the response speed index through a simple formula in combination with the preset time limit to ensure the efficiency and accuracy of this process.

[0130] Furthermore, the building design dynamic process management system further includes:

[0131] A review process optimization module 400, which is used to determine the review priority order of the initial version of the building construction drawings submitted by each subsequent participating unit according to the second priority set, and optimize the sequence of the review process.

[0132] In the embodiment of the present invention, the system will apply the result of comprehensively considering the response speed and drawing matching degree to the review process according to the ranking of the participating units in the second priority set. The system will automatically adjust the review queue and preferentially arrange the drawings submitted by those participating units with high cumulative matching degree and fast response speed for review.

[0133] This process is realized through a BIM platform or a project management system. These platforms can track the drawing submission records, response times, and matching degree scores of participating units, and then automatically generate an optimized review order for drawing review. Functional departments or project management teams can quickly find the drawings to be reviewed preferentially based on this order, avoiding inefficient manual screening. The review order of each drawing will be based on the comprehensive performance (quality and efficiency) of the unit, so as to ensure that high-quality drawings can be quickly identified and preferentially reviewed.

[0134] The implementation of this technical solution has a significant impact on practical applications. First of all, it greatly optimizes the workflow of drawing review. By prioritizing the review of high-quality and timely submitted drawings, it saves the time of reviewers and reduces unnecessary repetitive work. Secondly, this mechanism promotes positive competition among the participating construction units, encouraging each unit to not only improve the quality of the submitted drawings but also enhance its response speed to ensure that the project schedule is not delayed.

[0135] Finally, the optimized review order contributes to the overall construction progress of the project. Because timely review and confirmation of high-quality drawings can ensure that the construction progresses as planned, reducing construction rework or schedule delays caused by drawing errors or review delays. This optimized solution improves the efficiency of project management and the accuracy of drawing review, thus providing strong support for the successful implementation of the entire construction project.

[0136] In summary, based on the implementation of all the above technical solutions, the beneficial effects brought are significant and multi-dimensional. First of all, through intelligent drawing comparison and automated matching degree evaluation, the system can quickly screen out the initial construction drawings that meet the revision requirements, reducing errors and repetitive labor in manual review. Secondly, combined with the response speed index, the participating construction units that emphasize both quality and efficiency are prioritized, optimizing the order of drawing review and greatly improving the overall efficiency of the drawing review process.

[0137] This comprehensive evaluation method not only improves the work efficiency of reviewers but also effectively shortens the review cycle of the project, ensuring that the project schedule can be advanced on time. At the same time, the combination of response speed and matching degree promotes competition among the participating construction units, encouraging them to continuously improve the quality of drawings and the timeliness of submission. This technical solution helps to reduce the risk of project rework and the project duration delay caused by delayed review, thereby significantly improving the overall quality control and management level of the construction project.

[0138] It should be understood that although each step in the flowchart of each embodiment of the present invention is shown in sequence according to the indication of the arrow, these steps do not necessarily have to be executed in the order indicated by the arrow. Unless there is a clear description in this article, the execution of these steps does not have a strict order limit, and these steps can be executed in other orders. Moreover, at least a part of the steps in each embodiment may include multiple sub-steps or multiple stages. These sub-steps or stages do not necessarily have to be executed at the same moment, but can be executed at different moments. The execution order of these sub-steps or stages does not necessarily have to be sequential, but can be executed alternately or in turn with at least a part of other steps or sub-steps or stages of other steps.

[0139] Those of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the methods of the above embodiments can be completed by instructing relevant hardware through a computer program. The program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above methods. Among them, any reference to a memory, storage, database, or other medium used in the various embodiments provided in the present application can include non-volatile and / or volatile memories. Non-volatile memories can include read-only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memories can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in various forms, such as static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDR SDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous link DRAM (SLDRAM), Rambus direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and Rambus dynamic RAM (RDRAM), etc.

[0140] The technical features of the above embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. For the sake of brevity of description, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, it should be considered as the scope described in this specification.

[0141] The above embodiments merely represent several implementation manners of the present invention. The description is relatively specific and detailed, but it should not be construed as a limitation on the scope of the patent of the present invention. It should be noted that for those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the concept of the present invention, several modifications and improvements can still be made, and these all belong to the protection scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the patent of the present invention should be subject to the appended claims.

[0142] The above is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent replacements, and improvements made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A dynamic process management method for architectural design, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtain the selected revised drawings corresponding to the designated construction blueprint of the target building, and collect the preliminary construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing; Analyze the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, evaluate their matching values, accumulate the matching values ​​of each participating construction unit, sort all participating construction units according to the accumulated matching values, and generate a first priority set; The response speed index of each construction unit in the first priority set to the designated construction blueprint is evaluated in turn, and the corresponding cumulative matching value is adjusted according to the response speed index, and then the adjusted cumulative matching value is re-ranked to generate a second priority set; Based on the second priority set, determine the review priority of the preliminary construction drawings submitted by each participating unit, and optimize the order of the review process.

2. The architectural design dynamic process management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The steps of analyzing the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, evaluating the matching value thereof, accumulating the matching value of each participating construction unit, and ranking all participating construction units according to the accumulated matching value to generate the first priority set include: Analyze the preliminary construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, intelligently compare the preliminary construction drawings with the designated construction blueprints, evaluate the degree of consistency between the preliminary construction drawings of each participating construction unit and the selected revised drawings, and generate a matching value for each preliminary construction drawing; The matching values ​​of the preliminary construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit are accumulated, and the matching values ​​of the preliminary construction drawings of the same participating construction unit are combined into a cumulative matching value; According to the cumulative matching value of each participating unit, all participating units are sorted to generate a first priority set.

3. The architectural design dynamic process management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The steps of sequentially evaluating the response speed index of each construction unit in the first priority set to the designated construction blueprint, adjusting the corresponding cumulative matching value according to the response speed index, and then re-ranking according to the adjusted cumulative matching value to generate the second priority set include: Sequentially evaluate the response speed index of each construction unit in the first priority set to the designated construction blueprint; Multiply the cumulative matching value of each participating unit by its corresponding response speed index to calculate the adjusted cumulative matching value; All participating units are reordered according to the adjusted cumulative matching degree values ​​to generate a second priority set.

4. The architectural design dynamic process management method according to claim 3 is characterized in that: The steps of sequentially evaluating the response speed index of each construction unit in the first priority set to the designated construction blueprint include: Collect the response time of the initial version of the building construction drawings submitted by each construction unit in the first priority set for the selected revised drawings; Calculate the average response time of each construction unit in all submissions to obtain its average response time; The average response time of each construction participating unit is compared with the scheduled submission deadline to calculate its response speed index.

5. The architectural design dynamic process management method according to claim 4, characterized in that: The scheduled submission deadline refers to the deadline for the construction unit to submit the initial construction drawings within the specified time after receiving the selected revised drawings in accordance with the project plan and contract requirements. This deadline is set based on the complexity of the project, schedule requirements, scope of design modifications and industry standards.

6. A dynamic process management system for architectural design, characterized in that: The system comprises: a data collection module, a first priority set generation module, a second priority set generation module and a review process optimization module, wherein: A data collection module is used to obtain the selected revised drawings corresponding to the designated construction blueprint of the target building, and collect the preliminary construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing; A first priority set generation module is used to parse the initial construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, evaluate the matching value thereof, accumulate the matching value of each participating construction unit, sort all participating construction units according to the accumulated matching value, and generate a first priority set; The second priority set generation module is used to sequentially evaluate the response speed index of each construction unit in the first priority set to the specified construction blueprint, and adjust the corresponding cumulative matching value according to the response speed index, and then re-rank according to the adjusted cumulative matching value to generate a second priority set; The review process optimization module is used to determine the review priority of the preliminary construction drawings submitted by the subsequent participating construction units based on the second priority set, and optimize the order of the review process.

7. The architectural design dynamic process management system according to claim 6, characterized in that: The first priority set generation module specifically includes: A matching value generating unit is used to analyze the preliminary construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit corresponding to each selected revised drawing, intelligently compare the preliminary construction drawings with the designated construction blueprint, evaluate the degree of consistency between the preliminary construction drawings of each participating construction unit and the selected revised drawings, and generate a matching value for each preliminary construction drawing; The cumulative matching value determination unit is used to accumulate the matching values ​​of the preliminary construction drawings submitted by each participating construction unit, and integrate the matching degrees of various preliminary construction drawings of the same participating construction unit into a cumulative matching value; The first priority set generating unit is used to sort all the participating units according to the accumulated matching degree value of each participating unit to generate a first priority set.

8. The architectural design dynamic process management system according to claim 7, characterized in that: The second priority set generation module specifically includes: A response speed index evaluation unit, used to sequentially evaluate the response speed index of each construction participating unit in the first priority set to a designated construction blueprint; The cumulative matching value adjustment unit is used to multiply the cumulative matching value of each participating unit by its corresponding response speed index to calculate the adjusted cumulative matching value; The second priority set generating unit is used to re-order all construction participating units according to the adjusted cumulative matching degree values ​​to generate a second priority set.

9. The architectural design dynamic process management system according to claim 8, characterized in that: The second priority set generation module specifically includes: A response time determination unit is used to collect the response time of the initial version of the building construction drawings submitted by each construction unit in the first priority set for the selected revised drawings each time; The average response time calculation unit is used to calculate the average response time of each construction participating unit in all submissions to obtain its average response time; The response speed index calculation unit is used to compare the average response time of each participating construction unit with the predetermined submission time limit to calculate its response speed index.

10. The architectural design dynamic process management system according to claim 9, characterized in that: The scheduled submission deadline refers to the deadline for the construction unit to submit the initial construction drawings within the specified time after receiving the selected revised drawings in accordance with the project plan and contract requirements. This deadline is set based on the complexity of the project, schedule requirements, scope of design modifications and industry standards.

Images