Concrete pouring quality control method, system and storage medium

Abstract

The present invention provides a concrete pouring quality control method, system and storage medium, which belong to the field of concrete technology. Specifically, the method comprises: determining a preset concrete pouring rate based on a concrete uniformity variation assessment value and a uniformity assessment value, determining a concrete pouring problem value in combination with a variation in the concrete pouring height at different times, determining a concrete pouring position type and a pouring amount based on the concrete pouring position, determining a concrete pouring quality assessment value based on the concrete pouring problem value, the uniformity variation assessment value and the uniformity assessment value, outputting a pouring quality control suggestion based on the pouring quality assessment value, thereby further improving the quality control of concrete pouring construction.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of concrete, and in particular relates to a concrete pouring quality control method, system and storage medium. Background Art

[0002] The pouring quality of concrete is not only affected by the strength of the concrete itself, but also by the pouring flow rate and height change rate, which will have a certain degree of impact on the pouring quality of concrete. Therefore, how to achieve accurate control of the pouring quality of concrete has become a technical problem that needs to be solved urgently.

[0003] In order to achieve accurate control of the pouring quality of concrete, the invention patent CN202211156749.6 "Self-compacting concrete pouring quality control method, terminal and storage medium" collects the current pouring height information, calculates the current pouring flow rate based on the pouring time information and the current pouring height information, and sends the pouring flow rate information based on the current pouring flow rate and the current pouring height information to control the pouring quality. However, there are the following technical problems:

[0004] The existing technical solutions ignore the evaluation of the uniformity of concrete during the pouring process. During the pouring process, the uniformity of concrete can affect the pouring quality to a certain extent. Therefore, if differentiated pouring progress control is not considered in combination with the monitoring of the uniformity of concrete, accurate control of the concrete pouring quality cannot be achieved.

[0005] In response to the above technical problems, the present invention provides a concrete pouring quality control method, system and storage medium. Summary of the Invention

[0006] To achieve the purpose of the present invention, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:

[0007] According to one aspect of the present invention, an observable full-link log tracing method is provided.

[0008] A method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring, characterized by comprising:

[0009] S1 determines the concrete homogeneity of different image frames by analyzing the image analysis results of different image frames of the pouring monitoring image, and determines the concrete homogeneity evaluation value according to the number and distribution of image frames whose concrete homogeneity does not meet the requirements;

[0010] S2: determining the variation of the homogeneity at different moments based on the similarity evaluation results of different image frames of the pouring monitoring image, and determining the homogeneity variation evaluation amount of the concrete based on the variation of the homogeneity;

[0011] S3: determining a preset pouring rate of the concrete based on the concrete uniformity variation assessment value and the uniformity assessment value, and determining a pouring problem value of the concrete based on changes in the pouring height of the concrete at different times, and proceeding to the next step when the pouring problem value of the concrete meets the requirements;

[0012] S4 determines the type and amount of the concrete pouring position according to the concrete pouring position, and determines the pouring quality assessment value of the concrete in combination with the pouring problem value, uniformity variation assessment value and uniformity assessment value of the concrete, and outputs pouring quality control suggestions based on the pouring quality assessment value.

[0013] The beneficial effects of the present invention are:

[0014] 1. By determining the concrete homogeneity assessment value based on the number and distribution of image frames whose concrete homogeneity does not meet the requirements, the concrete pouring quality can be evaluated based on the concrete homogeneity, avoiding the technical problem of inaccurate pouring quality assessment results caused by the original single consideration of pouring rate.

[0015] 2. By determining the concrete uniformity change assessment amount based on the change in uniformity, a further assessment of the casting quality based on the change in concrete uniformity is achieved, thus avoiding technical problems of unqualified casting quality due to failure of concrete casting equipment or unqualified concrete uniformity, and further improving the accuracy of casting quality assessment.

[0016] 3. By combining the concrete pouring problem value, uniformity variation assessment value and uniformity assessment value to determine the pouring quality assessment value of the concrete, it is achieved that in addition to the assessment perspective of uniformity, the influence of the change in concrete pouring rate on the pouring quality is further considered, and the assessment of pouring quality from multiple angles is achieved, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of the assessment of pouring quality.

[0017] A further technical solution is that the pouring monitoring image is obtained according to a monitoring camera device, specifically, a monitoring image of the concrete during the pouring process is obtained according to the monitoring camera device, and the monitoring image is used as the pouring monitoring image.

[0018] A further technical solution is that the uniformity of the concrete in the image frame is determined based on the recognition result of the image feature of the image frame. Specifically, the image feature can be one or more of HOG, texture feature, and shape feature.

[0019] A further technical solution is that the method for determining the evaluation result of the similarity of the image frames is:

[0020] Image features of different image frames of the pouring monitoring image are extracted, and an evaluation result of a similarity between an image frame and a previous image frame of the image frame is determined based on the image features.

[0021] A further technical solution is that the value range of the concrete homogeneity variation evaluation value is between 0 and 1, wherein the larger the concrete homogeneity variation evaluation value is, the more drastic the variation of the concrete homogeneity during the pouring process.

[0022] In a second aspect, the present invention provides a computer system comprising: a memory and a processor in communication connection, and a computer program stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor, characterized in that: when the processor runs the computer program, the above-mentioned method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring is executed.

[0023] In a third aspect, the present invention provides a computer storage medium having a computer program stored thereon. When the computer program is executed in a computer, the computer is caused to execute the above-mentioned method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring.

[0024] Other features and advantages will be described in the following description, and in part will become apparent from the description, or understood by practicing the invention. The purpose and other advantages of the invention are realized and obtained by the structures particularly pointed out in the description and the drawings.

[0025] In order to make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, preferred embodiments are given below and described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0026] The above and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by describing in detail example embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0027] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of a method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring;

[0028] Figure 2 It is a flow chart of a method for determining an evaluation quantity of concrete homogeneity;

[0029] Figure 3 It is a framework diagram of a computer storage medium. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0030] To help those skilled in the art better understand the technical solutions in this specification, the following will provide a clear and complete description of the technical solutions in the embodiments of this specification, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of this specification, not all of them. All other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of this specification without creative work should fall within the scope of protection of this specification.

[0031] Example 1

[0032] To solve the above problems, according to one aspect of the present invention, Figure 1 As shown, a method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring is provided, which is characterized by specifically comprising:

[0033] S1 determines the concrete homogeneity of different image frames by analyzing the image analysis results of different image frames of the pouring monitoring image, and determines the concrete homogeneity evaluation value according to the number and distribution of image frames whose concrete homogeneity does not meet the requirements;

[0034] It should be noted that the pouring monitoring image is obtained according to a monitoring camera device. Specifically, the monitoring image of the concrete during the pouring process is obtained according to the monitoring camera device, and the monitoring image is used as the pouring monitoring image.

[0035] It is understandable that the uniformity of the concrete in the image frame is determined based on the recognition result of the image feature of the image frame. Specifically, the image feature may be one or more of HOG, texture feature, and shape feature.

[0036] For example, Figure 2 As shown, the method for determining the concrete homogeneity evaluation value is:

[0037] S11 determines a limited range of the uniformity of the concrete according to the concrete model, and determines image frames whose uniformity does not meet the requirement based on the uniformity of the concrete in different image frames and the limited range of the uniformity, and uses the determined image frames as difference image frames;

[0038] S12 determines whether the uniformity of the concrete meets the requirements based on the number of the difference image frames. If yes, proceed to the next step; if not, proceed to step S14;

[0039] S13: The deviation data between the uniformity of the concrete in the difference image frame and the uniformity limit range is used as uniformity deviation data, and a maximum value of the uniformity deviation data is used to determine whether the uniformity of the concrete meets the requirement. If so, the uniformity evaluation value of the concrete is determined based on the maximum value of the uniformity deviation data and the number of the difference image frames. If not, the process proceeds to step S14.

[0040] S14: dividing the difference image frames into problem image frames and deviation image frames based on the concrete uniformity deviation data of the difference image frames, determining the distribution uniformity of the problem image frames according to the distribution of the problem image frames, and determining the uniformity evaluation amount of the problem image frames based on the number of the problem image frames and the uniformity deviation data;

[0041] S15 determines the distribution uniformity of the deviation image frame according to the distribution of the deviation image frame, and determines the uniformity evaluation amount of the deviation image frame in combination with the number of the deviation image frames and the uniformity deviation data. The image frame excluding the difference image frame is regarded as a normal image, and the uniformity evaluation amount of the concrete is determined by the number of normal image frames and the uniformity deviation data, the uniformity evaluation amount of the problem image frame and the uniformity evaluation amount of the deviation image frame.

[0042] In one possible embodiment, determining the distribution uniformity of the problem image frames according to the distribution of the problem image frames specifically includes:

[0043] The pouring monitoring image is divided into multiple time periods using a preset time length, and the distribution number of problem image frames in different time periods is determined based on the distribution of the problem image frames in the pouring monitoring image. The distribution uniformity of the problem image frames is determined based on the distribution number of problem image frames in different time periods and the number of time periods in which problem image frames exist.

[0044] In another possible embodiment, the method for determining the concrete homogeneity evaluation value is:

[0045] Determining a limited range of the uniformity of the concrete according to the concrete model, and determining image frames whose uniformity does not meet the requirements based on the uniformity of the concrete in different image frames and the limited range of the uniformity, and using the determined image frames as difference image frames;

[0046] Dividing the difference image frames into problem image frames and deviation image frames based on the concrete uniformity deviation data of the difference image frames, determining the distribution uniformity of the problem image frames according to the distribution of the problem image frames, and determining the uniformity evaluation amount of the problem image frames based on the number of the problem image frames and the uniformity deviation data;

[0047] When the uniformity evaluation value of the problem image frame meets the requirements:

[0048] Then determining the concrete homogeneity evaluation value according to the homogeneity evaluation value and the proportion of the problem image frame in the image frame;

[0049] When the uniformity evaluation value of the problem image frame does not meet the requirements:

[0050] The distribution uniformity of the deviation image frames is determined according to the distribution of the deviation image frames, and the uniformity evaluation amount of the deviation image frames is determined in combination with the number of the deviation image frames and the uniformity deviation data. The image frame excluding the difference image frame is regarded as a normal image, and the uniformity evaluation amount of the concrete is determined by the number of normal image frames and the uniformity deviation data, the uniformity evaluation amount of the problem image frame and the uniformity evaluation amount of the deviation image frame.

[0051] S2: determining the variation of the homogeneity at different moments based on the similarity evaluation results of different image frames of the pouring monitoring image, and determining the homogeneity variation evaluation amount of the concrete based on the variation of the homogeneity;

[0052] It should be noted that the method for determining the evaluation result of the similarity of the image frames is:

[0053] Image features of different image frames of the pouring monitoring image are extracted, and an evaluation result of a similarity between an image frame and a previous image frame of the image frame is determined based on the image features.

[0054] For example, the method for determining the concrete homogeneity variation evaluation value is as follows:

[0055] S21: determining a variation in the homogeneity between the image frame and the image frame preceding the image frame based on a similarity evaluation result between the image frame and the image frame preceding the image frame, and determining whether there is an image frame whose homogeneity variation does not meet the requirement based on the homogeneity variation; if so, proceeding to the next step; if not, determining an evaluation amount of the homogeneity variation of the concrete based on a mean value of the homogeneity variation and the number of image frames;

[0056] S22: The image frames whose uniformity variation does not meet the requirement are regarded as abnormal variation image frames, and whether the number of abnormal variation image frames meets the requirement is determined based on the number of the image frames and the number of abnormal variation image frames. If so, the process proceeds to the next step; if not, the process proceeds to step S24.

[0057] S23: determining a maximum value of the variation of the uniformity of the abnormally changed image frames according to the variation of the uniformity of the abnormally changed image frames, and determining whether the requirement is met by the maximum value of the variation of the uniformity of the abnormally changed image frames; if so, determining the homogeneity variation evaluation amount of the concrete according to the number of the abnormally changed image frames and the maximum value of the variation of the uniformity of the abnormally changed image frames; if not, proceeding to the next step;

[0058] S24: determining a maximum value and an average value of the uniformity variation of the abnormally varied image frames based on the uniformity variation of the abnormally varied image frames, and determining an abnormal variation assessment value of the pouring monitoring image based on the number of the abnormally varied image frames, and defining the image frames excluding the abnormally varied image frames as normal variation image frames;

[0059] S25 obtains the number of the normal change image frames and the average value of the homogeneity change amount, and determines the homogeneity change evaluation amount of the concrete in combination with the abnormal change evaluation amount of the pouring monitoring image.

[0060] It can be understood that the value range of the concrete homogeneity variation evaluation value is between 0 and 1, wherein the larger the concrete homogeneity variation evaluation value is, the more drastic the variation of the concrete homogeneity during the pouring process.

[0061] In another possible embodiment, the method for determining the concrete homogeneity variation assessment value is:

[0062] determining a change in uniformity between the image frame and the image frame preceding the image frame based on a similarity evaluation result between the image frame and the image frame preceding the image frame, and determining an image frame whose change in uniformity does not meet a requirement as an abnormal change image frame;

[0063] When there is no abnormal change image frame in the image frames:

[0064] Then, the concrete homogeneity variation evaluation amount is determined by taking the average value of the homogeneity variation amount of the image frame and the image frame preceding the image frame;

[0065] When there is an abnormal change image frame among the image frames:

[0066] Determining a maximum value and an average value of the variation in uniformity of the abnormally varied image frames based on the variation in uniformity of the abnormally varied image frames, and determining an abnormal variation assessment value of the pouring monitoring image based on the number of the abnormally varied image frames;

[0067] When the abnormal change assessment value of the pouring monitoring image is within the preset data range:

[0068] determining the concrete uniformity variation evaluation amount based on the abnormal variation evaluation amount of the pouring monitoring image and the pouring duration of the pouring monitoring image;

[0069] When the abnormal change assessment value of the pouring monitoring image is outside the preset data range:

[0070] The image frames excluding the abnormal change image frames are used as normal change image frames, the number of the normal change image frames and the average value of the uniformity change amount are obtained, and the uniformity change assessment amount of the concrete is determined in combination with the abnormal change assessment amount of the pouring monitoring image.

[0071] S3: determining a preset pouring rate of the concrete based on the concrete uniformity variation assessment value and the uniformity assessment value, and determining a pouring problem value of the concrete based on changes in the pouring height of the concrete at different times, and proceeding to the next step when the pouring problem value of the concrete meets the requirements;

[0072] For example, the method for determining the preset pouring rate is:

[0073] When the concrete homogeneity evaluation meets the requirements:

[0074] Determining a concrete homogeneity variation interval corresponding to the concrete homogeneity variation assessment amount according to the concrete homogeneity variation assessment amount, and determining a preset concrete pouring rate according to a pouring control rate corresponding to the concrete homogeneity variation interval;

[0075] When the concrete homogeneity evaluation does not meet the requirements:

[0076] Determining the fastest pouring rate of the concrete based on the concrete homogeneity evaluation;

[0077] The concrete uniformity variation interval corresponding to the uniformity variation assessment amount is determined based on the concrete uniformity variation assessment amount, and the preset concrete pouring rate is determined based on the pouring control rate corresponding to the uniformity variation interval and the maximum value of the fastest pouring rate.

[0078] Specifically, the method for determining the concrete pouring problem value is:

[0079] S31 determines the concrete pouring rate at different times according to the change of the concrete pouring height at different times, and determines whether there is a moment when the pouring rate is greater than the preset pouring rate according to the concrete pouring rate at different times. If so, proceed to the next step; if not, determine the concrete pouring problem value according to the preset problem value;

[0080] S32: The moment when the pouring rate is greater than the preset pouring rate is regarded as the problematic pouring moment, and whether the number of problematic pouring moments meets the requirement is determined according to the number of problematic pouring moments and the pouring time of the concrete. If so, the process proceeds to the next step; if not, the process proceeds to step S34;

[0081] S33 determines the pouring rate deviation at the problematic pouring moment by using the pouring rate at the problematic pouring moment and the deviation of the preset pouring rate, and judges whether the sum of the pouring rate deviation at the problematic pouring moment meets the requirement; if so, determines the concrete pouring problem value by using the sum of the pouring rate deviation at the problematic pouring moment; if not, proceeds to the next step;

[0082] S34: determining the number of problematic pouring moments at which the pouring rate deviation is greater than a preset deviation based on the pouring rate deviation at the problematic pouring moment, and determining a pouring rate problem evaluation value at the problematic pouring moment in combination with the number of pouring rate deviations at the problematic pouring moment and the number of problematic pouring moments;

[0083] S35 obtains the number and distribution of moments when the pouring rate is not greater than the preset pouring rate, and determines the pouring problem value of the concrete in combination with the pouring rate problem evaluation value of the problematic pouring moment.

[0084] S4 determines the type and amount of the concrete pouring position according to the concrete pouring position, and determines the pouring quality assessment value of the concrete in combination with the pouring problem value, uniformity variation assessment value and uniformity assessment value of the concrete, and outputs pouring quality control suggestions based on the pouring quality assessment value.

[0085] Specifically, the method for determining the concrete pouring quality assessment value is:

[0086] Determining the concrete pouring quality impact value according to the type of the concrete pouring position and the pouring amount;

[0087] Determining a pouring uniformity quality assessment value of the concrete according to the uniformity variation assessment value, the uniformity assessment value, and the pouring quality impact value;

[0088] Determining a pouring rate quality assessment value of the concrete according to a pouring problem value, pouring time, and pouring quality impact value of the concrete;

[0089] The current pouring amount of the concrete is determined according to the pouring time of the concrete, and the pouring quality evaluation value of the concrete is determined in combination with the pouring uniformity quality evaluation value and the pouring rate quality evaluation value of the concrete.

[0090] Example 2

[0091] On the other hand, the present invention provides a computer system comprising: a memory and a processor in communication connection, and a computer program stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor, characterized in that the processor executes the above-mentioned concrete pouring quality control method when running the computer program.

[0092] Example 3

[0093] like Figure 3 As shown, the present invention provides a computer storage medium on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed in a computer, the computer is caused to execute the above-mentioned method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring.

[0094] Through the above embodiments, the present application achieves the following beneficial effects:

[0095] 1. By determining the concrete homogeneity assessment value based on the number and distribution of image frames whose concrete homogeneity does not meet the requirements, the concrete pouring quality can be evaluated based on the concrete homogeneity, avoiding the technical problem of inaccurate pouring quality assessment results caused by the original single consideration of pouring rate.

[0096] 2. By determining the concrete uniformity change assessment amount based on the change in uniformity, a further assessment of the casting quality based on the change in concrete uniformity is achieved, thus avoiding technical problems of unqualified casting quality due to failure of concrete casting equipment or unqualified concrete uniformity, and further improving the accuracy of casting quality assessment.

[0097] 3. By combining the concrete pouring problem value, uniformity variation assessment value and uniformity assessment value to determine the pouring quality assessment value of the concrete, it is achieved that in addition to the assessment perspective of uniformity, the influence of the change in concrete pouring rate on the pouring quality is further considered, and the assessment of pouring quality from multiple angles is achieved, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of the assessment of pouring quality.

[0098] The various embodiments in this specification are described in a progressive manner. Similar portions between the various embodiments can be referenced to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from the other embodiments. In particular, the device, apparatus, and non-volatile computer storage medium embodiments are generally similar to the method embodiments, so their descriptions are relatively simplified. For relevant details, refer to the descriptions of the method embodiments.

[0099] The foregoing description of this specification describes specific embodiments. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recited in the claims can be performed in an order different from that described in the embodiments and still achieve the desired results. Furthermore, the processes depicted in the accompanying drawings do not necessarily require the specific order shown or the sequential order to achieve the desired results. In certain embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.

[0100] The foregoing description is merely one or more embodiments of this specification and is not intended to limit this specification. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations may be made to one or more embodiments of this specification. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, or improvements made within the spirit and principles of one or more embodiments of this specification are intended to be within the scope of the claims of this specification.

Claims

1. A method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring, characterized in that: Specifically include: Determining the concrete homogeneity of different image frames by analyzing the image analysis results of different image frames of the pouring monitoring image, and determining the concrete homogeneity evaluation value according to the number and distribution of image frames in which the concrete homogeneity does not meet the requirements; Determining variations in homogeneity at different moments based on similarity evaluation results of different image frames of the pouring monitoring image, and determining an assessment amount of variations in homogeneity of the concrete based on the variations in homogeneity; Determining a preset concrete pouring rate based on the concrete uniformity variation assessment amount and the uniformity assessment amount, and determining a concrete pouring problem value based on variations in the concrete pouring height at different times, and proceeding to the next step when the concrete pouring problem value meets the requirements; Determining the type and amount of concrete pouring location based on the concrete pouring location, and determining a pouring quality assessment value of the concrete based on the pouring problem value, uniformity variation assessment value, and uniformity assessment value of the concrete, and outputting pouring quality control suggestions based on the pouring quality assessment value; The method for determining the preset pouring rate is: When the concrete homogeneity evaluation meets the requirements: Determining a concrete homogeneity variation interval corresponding to the concrete homogeneity variation assessment amount according to the concrete homogeneity variation assessment amount, and determining a preset concrete pouring rate according to a pouring control rate corresponding to the concrete homogeneity variation interval; When the concrete homogeneity evaluation does not meet the requirements: Determining the fastest pouring rate of the concrete based on the concrete homogeneity evaluation; determining, based on the concrete uniformity variation assessment amount, a concrete uniformity variation interval corresponding to the uniformity variation assessment amount, and determining a preset concrete pouring rate based on a pouring control rate corresponding to the uniformity variation interval and a maximum value of the fastest pouring rate; The method for determining the concrete pouring quality assessment value is: Determining the concrete pouring quality impact value according to the type of the concrete pouring position and the pouring amount; Determining a pouring uniformity quality assessment value of the concrete according to the uniformity variation assessment value, the uniformity assessment value, and the pouring quality impact value; Determining a pouring rate quality assessment value of the concrete according to a pouring problem value, pouring time, and pouring quality impact value of the concrete; The current pouring amount of the concrete is determined according to the pouring time of the concrete, and the pouring quality evaluation value of the concrete is determined in combination with the pouring uniformity quality evaluation value and the pouring rate quality evaluation value of the concrete.

2. The method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring according to claim 1, wherein: The pouring monitoring image is acquired using a monitoring camera device. Specifically, the monitoring image of the concrete during the pouring process is acquired using the monitoring camera device, and the monitoring image is used as the pouring monitoring image.

3. The method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring according to claim 1, wherein: The uniformity of the concrete in the image frame is determined based on a recognition result of an image feature of the image frame. Specifically, the image feature may be one or more of HOG, texture features, and shape features.

4. The method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring according to claim 1, wherein: The method for determining the homogeneity evaluation value of the concrete is: Determining a limited range of the uniformity of the concrete according to the concrete model, and determining image frames whose uniformity does not meet the requirements based on the uniformity of the concrete in different image frames and the limited range of the uniformity, and using the determined image frames as difference image frames; Dividing the difference image frames into problem image frames and deviation image frames based on the concrete uniformity deviation data of the difference image frames, determining the distribution uniformity of the problem image frames according to the distribution of the problem image frames, and determining the uniformity evaluation amount of the problem image frames based on the number of the problem image frames and the uniformity deviation data; When the uniformity evaluation value of the problem image frame meets the requirements: Then determining the concrete homogeneity evaluation value according to the homogeneity evaluation value and the proportion of the problem image frame in the image frame; When the uniformity evaluation value of the problem image frame does not meet the requirements: The distribution uniformity of the deviation image frames is determined according to the distribution of the deviation image frames, and the uniformity evaluation amount of the deviation image frames is determined in combination with the number of the deviation image frames and the uniformity deviation data. The image frame excluding the difference image frame is regarded as a normal image, and the uniformity evaluation amount of the concrete is determined by the number of normal image frames and the uniformity deviation data, the uniformity evaluation amount of the problem image frame and the uniformity evaluation amount of the deviation image frame.

5. The method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring according to claim 4, wherein: Determining the distribution uniformity of the problem image frames according to the distribution of the problem image frames specifically includes: The pouring monitoring image is divided into multiple time periods using a preset time length, and the distribution number of problem image frames in different time periods is determined based on the distribution of the problem image frames in the pouring monitoring image. The distribution uniformity of the problem image frames is determined based on the distribution number of problem image frames in different time periods and the number of time periods in which problem image frames exist.

6. The method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring according to claim 1, wherein: The method for determining the evaluation result of the similarity of the image frames is: Image features of different image frames of the pouring monitoring image are extracted, and an evaluation result of a similarity between an image frame and a previous image frame of the image frame is determined based on the image features.

7. The method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring according to claim 1, wherein: The value range of the concrete homogeneity variation evaluation value is between 0 and 1, wherein the larger the concrete homogeneity variation evaluation value is, the more drastic the variation of the concrete homogeneity during the pouring process is.

8. The method for controlling the quality of concrete pouring according to claim 1, wherein: The method for determining the concrete homogeneity variation evaluation amount is: determining a change in uniformity between the image frame and the image frame preceding the image frame based on a similarity evaluation result between the image frame and the image frame preceding the image frame, and determining an image frame whose change in uniformity does not meet a requirement as an abnormal change image frame; When there is no abnormal change image frame in the image frames: Then, the concrete homogeneity variation evaluation amount is determined by taking the average value of the homogeneity variation amount of the image frame and the image frame preceding the image frame; When there is an abnormal change image frame among the image frames: Determining a maximum value and an average value of the variation in uniformity of the abnormally varied image frames based on the variation in uniformity of the abnormally varied image frames, and determining an abnormal variation assessment value of the pouring monitoring image based on the number of the abnormally varied image frames; When the abnormal change assessment value of the pouring monitoring image is within the preset data range: determining the concrete uniformity variation evaluation amount based on the abnormal variation evaluation amount of the pouring monitoring image and the pouring duration of the pouring monitoring image; When the abnormal change assessment value of the pouring monitoring image is outside the preset data range: The image frames excluding the abnormal change image frames are used as normal change image frames, the number of the normal change image frames and the average value of the uniformity change amount are obtained, and the uniformity change assessment amount of the concrete is determined in combination with the abnormal change assessment amount of the pouring monitoring image.

9. A computer system comprising: A memory and a processor in communication connection, and a computer program stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor, characterized in that the processor executes a concrete pouring quality control method according to any one of claims 1 to 8 when running the computer program.

10. A computer storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed in a computer, causes the computer to execute the concrete pouring quality control method according to any one of claims 1 to 8.

Images