Project configuration management capability matching degree evaluation method and device based on ASPICE model

Abstract

The invention provides a project configuration management capability matching degree evaluation method based on an ASPICE model. The method comprises the following steps: S1, determining a project configuration management capability grade requirement based on the ASPICE model; s2, determining a plurality of process activity requirement detailed rules of the project according to the configuration management capability level requirements; and S3, based on a plurality of matching management capability dimensions, performing quantitative evaluation on each process activity requirement detailed rule, and outputting a resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project. Therefore, starting from basic practice, the matching degree of the configuration management capability is preferentially evaluated before the project is developed, and different resources are configured according to different matching degrees, so that project process activity redundancy and project resource waste with low capability level requirements are avoided, the resources required by configuration management are reasonably allocated, and the configuration management efficiency is improved. And the pressure caused by resources required by the ASPICE project is reduced.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of Internet technology, and in particular to a project configuration management capability matching evaluation method and device based on an ASPICE model. Background Art

[0002] With the rapid development of Internet of Vehicles, intelligent driving, and new energy vehicles in recent years, the proportion of software in automobile research and development has increased sharply, and enterprises have continuously strengthened their demand for software quality management. In order to improve the quality and efficiency of automobile software development and ensure that automobile software meets safety and functional requirements, the Automotive Software Process Improvement and Capability Deterministic Model (Automotive SPICE, referred to as ASPICE) has gradually been introduced into China and is well known by domestic enterprises. On the other hand, with the revision of TS16949, the requirement for regular audits for enterprises has also greatly promoted the application of ASPICE in China.

[0003] At present, ASPICE is a mandatory requirement for many domestic and foreign OEMs for software development-related suppliers. ASPICE is used to evaluate the process capabilities of suppliers and is used as a criterion for selecting suppliers.

[0004] For an enterprise, after the introduction of ASPICE, it is necessary to have full-time personnel to grasp the overall ASPICE requirements and participate in the discussion and formulation of all process plans. It is also necessary to have representatives of the implementation of specific process stages to participate in the discussion and formulation of the process and technical plans of that stage. Compared with the previous development method without the introduction of ASPICE, the R&D manpower investment of the project may increase by 1 times. Therefore, due to the substantial increase in manpower investment, it is even more necessary to allocate human resources more reasonably.

[0005] In the existing ASPICE system, there is only a strategy for software capability maturity, which only defines the requirements for establishing and maintaining the integrity of all work products of a process or project and making them available to affected parties. This requirement is based on basic practice and does not give priority to the matching assessment of configuration management capabilities before the project is launched. If all projects are configured according to the same requirements, it will lead to redundancy of project process activities and waste of project resources for projects with low capability level requirements.

[0006] Based on this, a new solution is needed. Summary of the invention

[0007] Aiming at the problem that the existing technology does not give priority to evaluating the matching degree of project configuration management capability requirements and cannot reasonably allocate project resources in configuration management activities, a project configuration management capability matching degree evaluation method and device based on ASPICE model are provided.

[0008] In a first aspect, the present invention implements a project configuration management capability matching evaluation method based on the ASPICE model, comprising:

[0009] S1. Determine the configuration management capability level requirements for projects based on the ASPICE model;

[0010] S2. Determine the detailed requirements of multiple process activities of the project according to the configuration management capability level requirements;

[0011] S3. Based on multiple matching management capability dimensions, a quantitative assessment is performed on the requirements of each process activity, and the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is output.

[0012] Preferably, the multiple matching management capability dimensions include configuration management policy, configuration items, configuration management system, branch management, and baseline management.

[0013] Preferably, step S3 comprises:

[0014] S31. For each of the process activity requirement details, score the required resources and existing resources for each matching management capability dimension according to the configuration management capability matching calculation table;

[0015] S32, adding up all the required resource scores and all the existing resource scores of the process activity requirement details, respectively, to obtain the total required resource score and the total existing resource score of the process activity requirement details;

[0016] S33, obtaining the resource matching degree of the process activity requirement details according to the required resource total score and the existing resource total score;

[0017] S34. Taking the average value of the resource matching degree of all process activity requirement details of the project as the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project.

[0018] Preferably, it also includes:

[0019] When the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is higher than a preset threshold, the project is classified as a project that can reuse existing resources, and a low score is assigned to the resource allocation weight of the project;

[0020] When the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is lower than a preset threshold, the project is classified as a project that cannot reuse existing resources, and a high score is assigned to the resource allocation weight of the project;

[0021] Project configuration management resources are allocated to the project according to the resource allocation weight of the project.

[0022] In a second aspect, the present invention provides a project configuration management capability matching evaluation device based on the ASPICE model, comprising:

[0023] The first determination module is used to determine the configuration management capability level requirements of the project based on the ASPICE model;

[0024] A second determination module is used to determine the detailed requirements of multiple process activities of the project according to the configuration management capability level requirements;

[0025] The evaluation module is used to quantitatively evaluate the requirements of each process activity based on multiple matching management capability dimensions, and output the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project.

[0026] Preferably, the multiple matching management capability dimensions include configuration management policy, configuration items, configuration management system, branch management, and baseline management.

[0027] Preferably, the evaluation module comprises:

[0028] A scoring unit, for scoring the required resources and existing resources of each matching management capability dimension according to the configuration management capability matching degree calculation table for each of the process activity requirement details;

[0029] A weighting unit, used for adding all the required resource scores and all the existing resource scores of the process activity requirement details respectively to obtain the required resource total score and the existing resource total score of the process activity requirement details;

[0030] The calculation unit obtains the resource matching degree of the process activity requirement details according to the required resource total score and the existing resource total score, and takes the average value of the resource matching degrees of all process activity requirement details of the project as the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project.

[0031] Preferably, it also includes:

[0032] A classification and assignment module, for classifying the project as a project that can reuse existing resources and assigning a low score to the resource allocation weight of the project when the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is higher than a preset threshold; for classifying the project as a project that cannot reuse existing resources and assigning a high score to the resource allocation weight of the project when the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is lower than the preset threshold;

[0033] The resource allocation module is used to allocate project configuration management resources to the project according to the resource allocation weight of the project.

[0034] The project configuration management capability matching evaluation method and device based on the ASPICE model provided by the present invention determine the configuration management capability level requirements of the project based on the ASPICE model according to the project requirements; determine the multiple process activity requirement details of the project according to the configuration management capability level requirements; quantitatively evaluate each process activity requirement detail according to different management capability dimensions; finally, calculate the configuration management capability resource matching evaluation result of the project according to the evaluation result of each activity requirement detail; thus, starting from basic practice, the matching degree of the configuration management capability is evaluated first before the project is carried out, and different resources are configured for different matching degrees, so as to avoid the redundancy of project process activities and waste of project resources that lead to low capability level requirements, thereby reasonably allocating the resources required for configuration management and reducing the pressure brought by the resources required for the ASPICE project. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0035] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art are briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only embodiments of the present invention. For those of ordinary skill in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on the provided drawings without creative work:

[0036] Figure 1 A flowchart of a project configuration management capability matching evaluation method based on the ASPICE model provided for the implementation of the present invention;

[0037] Figure 2 A system block diagram of a device for evaluating project configuration management capability matching based on the ASPICE model provided for the implementation of the present invention; DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0038] In order to facilitate understanding of the present invention, the present invention will be described more fully below with reference to the relevant drawings. Typical embodiments of the present invention are given in the drawings. However, the present invention can be implemented in many different forms and is not limited to the embodiments described herein. On the contrary, the purpose of providing these embodiments is to make the disclosure of the present invention more thorough and comprehensive.

[0039] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as those commonly understood by those skilled in the art of the present invention. The terms used in the specification of the present invention herein are only for the purpose of describing specific embodiments and are not intended to limit the present invention.

[0040] The general idea of ​​the present invention is: in view of the problem that the prior art does not give priority to evaluating the matching degree of project configuration management capability requirements and cannot reasonably allocate resources in the configuration management activities of the project, a project configuration management capability matching degree evaluation method and device based on the ASPICE model are provided. According to the project requirements, the configuration management capability level requirements of the project based on the ASPICE model are determined; according to the configuration management capability level requirements, multiple process activity requirement details of the project are determined; according to different management capability dimensions, each process activity requirement detail is quantitatively evaluated; finally, according to the evaluation result of each activity requirement detail, the configuration management capability resource matching degree evaluation result of the project is calculated; therefore, starting from basic practice, the matching degree of configuration management capability is evaluated first before the project is carried out, and different resources are allocated according to different matching degrees, so as to avoid the redundancy of project process activities and waste of project resources that lead to low capability level requirements, thereby reasonably allocating the resources required for configuration management and reducing the pressure brought by the resources required for the ASPICE project.

[0041] In order to better understand the above-mentioned technical scheme, the above-mentioned technical scheme will be described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific implementation methods. It should be understood that the embodiments of the present invention and the specific features in the embodiments are detailed descriptions of the technical scheme of the present application, rather than limitations on the technical scheme of the present application. In the absence of conflict, the embodiments of the present invention and the technical features in the embodiments can be combined with each other.

[0042] Embodiment 1.

[0043] The embodiment of the present invention provides a project configuration management capability matching evaluation method based on the ASPICE model. Figure 1 As shown, the method includes:

[0044] S1, determine the configuration management capability level requirements of the project based on the ASPICE model;

[0045] Specifically, when starting a project based on the ASPICE model, the configuration management capability requirement of the project will be determined first, for example, the process level, project level, etc., and the capability level requirement is the configuration management capability requirement described in the present invention.

[0046] S2. Determine the detailed requirements of multiple process activities of the project according to the configuration management capability level requirements;

[0047] Specifically, unlike the traditional packaging by level, configuration management resources are directly allocated according to the required capability level, which ultimately results in configuration management resources being allocated to activities that have already met the requirements and do not require resource allocation. After determining the configuration management capability level requirements according to the project requirements, the present invention first analyzes which process activity requirements details are involved in the project requirements, and then determines from each configuration management capability dimension whether it is the company's existing capability and how many process activity requirements details need to be met.

[0048] For example, if the configuration management capability level requirement determined according to the project requirements is at the project level, first analyze the process activity requirement details involved in the configuration management capability level requirement, whether the requirement has been met by the existing capabilities, and how many process activity requirement details need to be met. For example, as shown in Table 1 below, if the configuration management capability level requirement is at the process level, then the process activity requirement details included are determined to be "the process achieves its defined outcomes"; if the configuration management capability level requirement is at the project level, then multiple process activity requirement details such as "the implementation objectives of the process are identified" are determined to be included.

[0049] If there are requirements for configuration items, no modification is required; then the analysis results are imported into the analysis system to obtain the score results for each sub-item.

[0050] S3. Based on multiple matching management capability dimensions, quantitatively evaluate the requirements of each process activity and output the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project;

[0051] Specifically, in order to select the best configuration management resource allocation plan, it is necessary to score each process activity requirement from each matching management capability dimension, where multiple matching management capability dimensions include configuration management strategy, configuration items, configuration management system, branch management, and baseline management, to determine whether the company's existing resources meet the requirements. Specifically, it includes:

[0052] S31. For each of the process activity requirement details, score the required resources and existing resources for each matching management capability dimension according to the configuration management capability matching calculation table;

[0053] S32, adding up all the required resource scores and all the existing resource scores of the process activity requirement details, respectively, to obtain the total required resource score and the total existing resource score of the process activity requirement details;

[0054] S33, obtaining the resource matching degree of the process activity requirement details according to the required resource total score and the existing resource total score;

[0055] S34. Taking the average value of the resource matching degree of all process activity requirement details of the project as the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project.

[0056] Specifically, in the embodiment of the present invention, a configuration management capability matching calculation table is established, and scoring is performed in the calculation table. Specifically, the configuration management capability matching calculation table is as follows:

[0057]

[0058]

[0059]

[0060] It should be noted that the process activity requirements in the above matching calculation table are only partial and can be increased or decreased in actual application.

[0061] Furthermore, in this embodiment, for each process activity requirement, the [required resources] and [existing resources] of the five dimensions of "configuration management strategy / configuration item / configuration management system / branch management / baseline management" are scored; the final matching score is obtained by adding and comparing the scores. For example, for the [required resources] item, if the ASPICE project has requirements for the five dimensions of "configuration management strategy / configuration item / configuration management system / branch management / baseline management", 1 point is given; if there are no requirements, 0 points are given. For the [existing resources] item, it is evaluated according to the existing capabilities. If the five dimensions of "configuration management strategy / configuration item / configuration management system / branch management / baseline management" have met the requirements, 1 point is given; if the requirements are not met, 0 points are given.

[0062] Furthermore, for each process activity requirement, resource matching degree = (total score of existing resources / total score of required resources) * 100%; when the total score of existing resources is greater than the total score of required resources, the resource matching degree is directly 100%. For example, if the total score of existing resources is 4 and the total score of required resources is 5, the resource matching degree is 80%; if the total score of existing resources is 4 and the total score of required resources is 3, the resource matching degree is 100%.

[0063] Furthermore, for this project, after obtaining the resource matching degree of each process activity requirement, the resource matching degree of each process activity requirement is added together and the average value is taken as the resource matching degree of the project. For example, a project includes 4 process activity requirement, and the resource matching degree of each process activity requirement is 1, 0.6, 0.8, and 0.4 respectively, then the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is 0.7.

[0064] Furthermore, when the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is higher than the preset threshold, the project is classified as a project that can reuse existing resources, and a low score is assigned to the resource allocation weight of the project; when the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is lower than the preset threshold, the project is classified as a project that cannot reuse existing resources, and a high score is assigned to the resource allocation weight of the project; project configuration management resources are allocated to the project according to the resource allocation weight of the project. For example, if the preset threshold is 0.8 and the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of a certain project is 0.7, it means that the existing resources cannot fully meet the project requirements, and the project is a project that cannot reuse existing resources. The resource allocation weight of the project is set to high, and more resources are allocated to the project in the subsequent resource allocation; if the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of a certain project is 0.9, it means that the existing resources can meet the project requirements, and the project is a project that can reuse existing resources. The resource allocation weight of the project is set to low, and fewer resources are allocated to the project in the subsequent resource allocation. Therefore, starting from basic practice, configuration management capabilities are given priority, and a matching assessment is conducted before the project is launched, so that projects do not have to be configured according to the same requirements, avoiding redundancy in project process activities with low capability level requirements and waste of project resources.

[0065] The embodiment of the present invention provides a project configuration management capability matching evaluation device based on the ASPICE model, such as Figure 2 As shown, the device includes a first determination module 210, a second determination module 220 and an evaluation module 230, wherein:

[0066] The first determination module is used to determine the configuration management capability level requirements of the project based on the ASPICE model;

[0067] A second determination module is used to determine the detailed requirements of multiple process activities of the project according to the configuration management capability level requirements;

[0068] The evaluation module is used to quantitatively evaluate the requirements of each process activity based on multiple matching management capability dimensions, and output the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project.

[0069] Specifically, in an embodiment of the present invention, the multiple matching management capability dimensions include configuration management policies, configuration items, configuration management systems, branch management, and baseline management.

[0070] Specifically, in one embodiment of the present invention, the evaluation module includes: a scoring unit, which is used to score the required resources and existing resources of each matching management capability dimension for each process activity requirement detail according to the configuration management capability matching calculation table; a weighting unit, which is used to add all the required resource scores and all the existing resource scores of the process activity requirement detail respectively to obtain the total score of the required resources and the total score of the existing resources of the process activity requirement detail; a calculation unit, which obtains the resource matching degree of the process activity requirement detail according to the total score of the required resources and the total score of the existing resources, and takes the average value of the resource matching degrees of all the process activity requirement details of the project as the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project.

[0071] Specifically, in one embodiment of the present invention, it also includes a classification assignment module, which is used to classify the project as a project that can reuse existing resources when the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is higher than a preset threshold, and assign a low score to the resource allocation weight of the project; when the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is lower than the preset threshold, classify the project as a project that cannot reuse existing resources, and assign a high score to the resource allocation weight of the project; a resource allocation module, which is used to allocate project configuration management resources to the project according to the resource allocation weight of the project.

[0072] Those skilled in the art can understand that the above is an embodiment of the project configuration management capability matching evaluation device based on the ASPICE model provided in an embodiment of the present invention. The system and the device belong to the same inventive concept as the project configuration management capability matching evaluation method based on the ASPICE model. For details not fully described in the embodiment of the project configuration management capability matching evaluation device based on the ASPICE model, reference can be made to the embodiment of the project configuration management capability matching evaluation method based on the ASPICE model.

[0073] The embodiment of the present invention further provides a project configuration management capability matching evaluation device based on the ASPICE model, which may include:

[0074] Memory for storing computer programs;

[0075] The processor can implement the following steps when executing the computer program stored in the above memory:

[0076] Determine the configuration management capability level requirements of the project based on the ASPICE model; determine multiple process activity requirement details of the project according to the configuration management capability level requirements; quantitatively evaluate each process activity requirement detail based on multiple matching management capability dimensions, and output the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project.

[0077] The embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps can be implemented;

[0078] Determine the configuration management capability level requirements of the project based on the ASPICE model; determine multiple process activity requirement details of the project according to the configuration management capability level requirements; quantitatively evaluate each process activity requirement detail based on multiple matching management capability dimensions, and output the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project.

[0079] The computer-readable storage medium may include: a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and other media that can store program codes.

[0080] In the description provided herein, a large number of specific details are described. However, it is understood that embodiments of the present invention can be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well-known methods, structures and techniques are not shown in detail so as not to obscure the understanding of this description.

[0081] Similarly, it should be understood that in order to streamline the present disclosure and aid in understanding one or more of the various inventive aspects, in the above description of exemplary embodiments of the present invention, various features of the present invention are sometimes grouped together into a single embodiment, figure, or description thereof. However, this disclosed method should not be interpreted as reflecting the intention that the claimed invention requires more features than those explicitly recited in each claim. More specifically, as reflected in the claims below, inventive aspects lie in less than all the features of the individual embodiments disclosed above. Therefore, the claims that follow the specific embodiment are hereby expressly incorporated into the specific embodiment, with each claim itself serving as a separate embodiment of the present invention.

[0082] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the modules in the devices in the embodiments can be adaptively changed and arranged in one or more devices different from the embodiments. The modules or units or components in the embodiments can be combined into one module or unit or component, and in addition they can be divided into multiple submodules or subunits or subassemblies. Except that at least some of such features and / or processes or units are mutually exclusive, all features disclosed in this specification and all processes or units of any method or device disclosed in this manner can be combined in any combination. Unless otherwise clearly stated, each feature disclosed in this specification can be replaced by an alternative feature providing the same, equivalent or similar purpose.

[0083] In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that, although some embodiments described herein include certain features included in other embodiments but not other features, the combination of features of different embodiments is meant to be within the scope of the present invention and form different embodiments. For example, any one of the claimed embodiments may be used in any combination.

[0084] The various component embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in hardware, or in software modules running on one or more processors, or in a combination thereof. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that a microprocessor or digital signal processor (DSP) can be used in practice to implement some or all of the functions of some or all of the components in the embodiments of the present invention. The present invention can also be implemented as a device or apparatus program (e.g., computer program and computer program product) for executing part or all of the methods described herein. Such a program implementing the present invention can be stored on a computer-readable medium, or can have the form of one or more signals. Such a signal can be downloaded from an Internet website, or provided on a carrier signal, or provided in any other form.

[0085] It should be noted that the above embodiments illustrate the present invention rather than limit it, and that those skilled in the art may devise alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In the claims, any reference symbol between brackets should not be constructed as a limitation to the claims. The word "one" or "an" preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. The present invention may be implemented by means of hardware including a number of different elements and by means of a suitably programmed computer. Several of these devices may be embodied by the same hardware item. The use of the words first, second, and third, etc. does not indicate any order. These words may be interpreted as names.

Claims

1. A project configuration management capability matching evaluation method based on the ASPICE model, characterized in that: include: S1. Determine the configuration management capability level requirements for projects based on the ASPICE model; S2. Determine the detailed requirements of multiple process activities of the project according to the configuration management capability level requirements; S3. Based on multiple matching management capability dimensions, a quantitative assessment is performed on the requirements of each process activity, and the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is output.

2. According to the project configuration management capability matching evaluation method based on the ASPICE model in claim 1, it is characterized in that: The multiple matching management capability dimensions include configuration management strategy, configuration items, configuration management system, branch management, and baseline management.

3. The project configuration management capability matching evaluation method based on the ASPICE model according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The step S3 comprises: S31. For each of the process activity requirement details, score the required resources and existing resources for each matching management capability dimension according to the configuration management capability matching calculation table; S32, adding up all the required resource scores and all the existing resource scores of the process activity requirement details, respectively, to obtain the total required resource score and the total existing resource score of the process activity requirement details; S33, obtaining the resource matching degree of the process activity requirement details according to the required resource total score and the existing resource total score; S34. Taking the average value of the resource matching degree of all process activity requirement details of the project as the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project.

4. The project configuration management capability matching evaluation method based on the ASPICE model according to claim 3 is characterized in that: Also includes: When the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is higher than a preset threshold, the project is classified as a project that can reuse existing resources, and a low score is assigned to the resource allocation weight of the project; When the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is lower than a preset threshold, the project is classified as a project that cannot reuse existing resources, and a high score is assigned to the resource allocation weight of the project; Project configuration management resources are allocated to the project according to the resource allocation weight of the project.

5. A project configuration management capability matching evaluation device based on the ASPICE model, characterized in that: include: The first determination module is used to determine the configuration management capability level requirements of the project based on the ASPICE model; A second determination module is used to determine the detailed requirements of multiple process activities of the project according to the configuration management capability level requirements; The evaluation module is used to quantitatively evaluate the requirements of each process activity based on multiple matching management capability dimensions, and output the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project.

6. The project configuration management capability matching evaluation device based on the ASPICE model according to claim 5 is characterized in that: The multiple matching management capability dimensions include configuration management strategy, configuration items, configuration management system, branch management, and baseline management.

7. The project configuration management capability matching evaluation device based on the ASPICE model according to claim 6 is characterized in that: The evaluation module includes: A scoring unit, for scoring the required resources and existing resources of each matching management capability dimension according to the configuration management capability matching degree calculation table for each of the process activity requirement details; A weighting unit, used for adding all the required resource scores and all the existing resource scores of the process activity requirement details respectively to obtain the required resource total score and the existing resource total score of the process activity requirement details; The calculation unit obtains the resource matching degree of the process activity requirement details according to the required resource total score and the existing resource total score, and takes the average value of the resource matching degrees of all process activity requirement details of the project as the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project.

8. The project configuration management capability matching evaluation device based on the ASPICE model according to claim 7 is characterized in that: Also includes: A classification and assignment module, for classifying the project as a project that can reuse existing resources and assigning a low score to the resource allocation weight of the project when the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is higher than a preset threshold; for classifying the project as a project that cannot reuse existing resources and assigning a high score to the resource allocation weight of the project when the resource matching degree of the configuration management capability of the project is lower than the preset threshold; The resource allocation module is used to allocate project configuration management resources to the project according to the resource allocation weight of the project.

9. A project configuration management capability matching evaluation device based on the ASPICE model, characterized in that: include: Memory for storing computer programs; A processor is used to implement the steps of the project configuration management capability matching evaluation method based on the ASPICE model as described in any one of claims 1 to 4 when executing the computer program.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the project configuration management capability matching evaluation method based on the ASPICE model according to any one of claims 1 to 4 are implemented.

Images