Power enterprise emergency drill management system based on Internet

Abstract

The invention discloses a power enterprise emergency drilling management system based on the Internet, and relates to the technical field of power emergency drilling, and the system comprises a plan collection module which is used for collecting the information of a power enterprise emergency plan; the pre-arranged plan evaluation module evaluates whether the current emergency pre-arranged plan has compliance, practicability and operability or not; the feedback module is used for evaluating the emergency plan meeting the requirements and feeding back an evaluation result to the plan evaluation module; the standardization and the speciality of emergency drilling are improved through a standardized process; on-line stored drilling data is convenient to query and manage, the risk of data loss is avoided, continuous improvement and optimization of emergency drilling work are promoted through continuous evaluation and rectification, the seriousness and tension atmosphere of drilling are enhanced through systematic drilling management, the attention degree of participants is improved, and the training efficiency is improved. Complete drill records and data storage help to avoid responsibility investigation risks caused by data problems.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of electric power emergency drills, and more specifically to an Internet-based emergency drill management system for electric power enterprises. Background Art

[0002] The power enterprise emergency drill management system adopts the idea of ​​Internet + drill business, combining traditional desktop emergency drill work with Internet technology. It is the direction of emergency drill informatization development, which can not only save manpower, but also standardize emergency drill management work and improve the quality and efficiency of emergency drill work. Relying on a professional emergency plan drill system, this platform integrates emergency drill laws and regulations, management systems, regional risk four-color maps, emergency evacuation route maps, drill plans, drill programs, emergency organizations, emergency teams, emergency supplies, drill programs, scenario construction, drill implementation, drill records, drill evaluation, drill summary, rectification verification, annual evaluation and other functions, making the emergency plan drill work of power companies more professional, standardized and convenient; However, when applying emergency plans for power company safety management, there may be a lack of in-depth research and professional guidance during the formulation of emergency plans, resulting in incomplete plan content, unreasonable link settings, and failure to fully consider possible problems in specific scenarios. In addition, some plans are not targeted and do not conduct risk analysis and emergency investigations based on actual conditions. This technical solution can be achieved by evaluating the emergency plan in advance and making adjustments based on the results of the evaluation. Summary of the invention

[0003] In view of the existing deficiencies in the prior art, an object of the present invention is to provide an Internet-based emergency drill management system for power enterprises.

[0004] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the present invention provides, on one hand, an Internet-based emergency drill management system for electric power enterprises, including a plan collection module, wherein the plan collection module is used to collect information on emergency plans of electric power enterprises; A plan evaluation module, which is used to evaluate the emergency plan; A feedback module is used to generate feedback modification suggestions based on the results of the plan evaluation module: Preferably, the plan assessment module includes a risk assessment unit and an emergency plan unit, and the risk assessment unit is used to quantitatively analyze the potential risks of the emergency plan of the power enterprise in the emergency plan, specifically: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the total evaluation score Q of the emergency plan; in To use the plan responsibility value, To use the content value of the plan, is the plan process value, is the emergency event value; Transmitting the total evaluation score Q to the emergency plan unit; The emergency plan unit is used to formulate a corresponding emergency plan according to the quantitative analysis results of the risk assessment unit.

[0005] Preferred: The specific way to obtain is as follows: According to the formula ; ; ; ; Calculate and obtain The value of is the authenticity value, For practical value, is the compliance value, is the validity value, It is a guide value.

[0006] Preferably: the specific working mode of the emergency plan unit is as follows: Obtain the resource assessment value R and assistance capacity value A of the emergency plan; Standardize the risk score to obtain the standardized total assessment score ; According to the formula , get the total evaluation value P of the plan content, where , and is the preset weight coefficient; A threshold value P of the total evaluation value of the plan content is set in advance. If the total evaluation value P of the plan content is greater than the threshold, the emergency plan is judged to meet the requirements, otherwise it is adjusted.

[0007] Arrange the total evaluation value P of the plan contents from large to small, and purchase or supplement resources from outside according to priority and resource gaps.

[0008] Preferably, the specific method of obtaining the resource evaluation value R is as follows: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the resource evaluation value R, where n is the total number of resources, represents the effectiveness score of the i-th resource, is the number of the i-th resource.

[0009] Preferably, the specific method of obtaining the assistance capability value A is as follows: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the assistance capability value A, where m is the total number of assistance sources, represents the effectiveness score of the j-th aid source, is the responsiveness of the jth assistance source.

[0010] Preferably: the specific working mode of the feedback module is as follows: First, all relevant data were collected from the online collaborative unit; The total score G of the collaborative exercise process is obtained based on the collected relevant data; According to the formula , calculate and obtain the feedback adjustment coefficient ,in The coefficient of influence of feedback on plan adjustment; According to the formula , calculate and obtain the total evaluation value of the optimized plan content , the total value of the optimized plan content evaluation Substitute into the plan evaluation module for evaluation.

[0011] Preferably, the specific method for obtaining the total score G of the collaborative exercise process is as follows: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the total score G of the collaborative exercise process; Where V is the number of key indicators of the total score of the collaborative exercise process, It is The weight of the key indicators, It is The scores of key indicators.

[0012] Preferably, it also includes a comprehensive management module, which is used to improve the standardization of emergency drills of power companies in emergency plans through information technology, and the specific steps are: First, search for laws and regulations, then establish a management system; Finally, the simultaneous generation of drill records and on-site formation of evaluation reports are achieved to ensure the authenticity and reliability of the data.

[0013] Preferred: The process of querying laws and regulations and then establishing a management system is as follows: Obtain national laws, regulations, industry standards and local policies related to emergency drills for power companies in emergency plans; Use the legal and regulatory query function in the power company emergency drill management system in the emergency plan to search and obtain the latest legal and regulatory information; Assess the compliance of existing management systems and operating procedures with laws and regulations, and identify gaps and potential compliance risks.

[0014] How it works Help power companies to comprehensively consider possible emergencies, improve the pertinence and practicality of emergency plans, and ensure that the contents of emergency plans are close to actual needs. The emergency drill management system for power companies can effectively solve problems such as incomplete emergency plan content, lack of pertinence, and imperfect drill evaluation and feedback mechanisms, and improve the emergency management and response capabilities of power companies. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0015] Figure 1 It is a system block diagram of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0016] Application scenarios: It is mainly used in the fields of power enterprise safety management, government agencies and public services, schools and educational institutions in emergency plans. By simulating natural disasters, production safety accidents, social security incidents, public health incidents and other scenarios, it helps power enterprises and institutions in emergency plans to improve their emergency response capabilities to emergencies. It is used to solve problems including enhancing risk awareness in dealing with emergencies, testing and optimizing emergency plans, enhancing emergency response capabilities, running-in mechanisms, training teams, and reducing possible losses in actual emergencies through simulations; However, when applying emergency plans to power companies for safety management, there may be a lack of in-depth research and professional guidance in the process of formulating emergency plans, resulting in incomplete plans, unreasonable link settings, and failure to fully consider possible problems in specific scenarios. In addition, some plans are not targeted and do not conduct risk analysis and emergency investigation based on actual conditions. This technical solution can evaluate the emergency plan in advance and make adjustments based on the results of the evaluation; Reference Figure 1 : An Internet-based emergency drill management system for power enterprises, including a plan collection module, a plan evaluation module and a feedback module; Help power companies to comprehensively consider possible emergencies, improve the pertinence and practicality of emergency plans, and ensure that the contents of emergency plans are close to actual needs. The emergency drill management system for power companies can effectively solve problems such as incomplete contents of emergency plans, lack of pertinence, and imperfect drill evaluation and feedback mechanisms, and improve the emergency management and response capabilities of power companies; The plan collection module is used to collect information on the emergency plan of the power company; it should be noted that in this embodiment, the plan of the power company is a fire plan, and the specific process is: early warning and alarm, how to discover a fire and report it in time, evacuation: evacuation plan and route, including evacuation guidance and assembly points, fire extinguishing: how to use firefighting facilities and equipment to extinguish an initial fire, rescue: how to search and rescue personnel and first aid for the wounded; The emergency plan evaluation module is used to evaluate the emergency plan; it should be noted that it can help the power company to comprehensively consider possible emergencies in the emergency plan, improve the pertinence and practicality of the plan, and ensure that the content of the plan is close to actual needs; A feedback module is used to generate feedback modification suggestions based on the results of the plan evaluation module.

[0017] The feedback module further includes an online collaboration unit, which is used to conduct collaborative drills on emergency plans that meet the requirements; It should be noted that, in this embodiment, the specific steps are: First, based on the results of the plan assessment module, create one or more possible emergency scenarios. These scenarios should simulate real events as much as possible, including the time, location, type and possible impact of the accident. Participants in the drill were assigned different roles and responsibilities, such as commanders, rescuers, information reporters, etc., to ensure that each role clearly understood their tasks and responsibilities; During the exercise, participants interacted in real time through an online platform to simulate the emergency response process, which may include information collection, decision-making, resource deployment and on-site disposal; The online collaboration unit should have data tracking capabilities to record key decisions and actions during the exercise and provide a basis for subsequent evaluation; Based on the progress of the exercise and the performance of the participants, the instructor can adjust the complexity of the scenario in real time, increasing or decreasing the challenges, in order to test and improve the emergency response capabilities of the participants; After the exercise, all participants should provide feedback; It should be noted that it may include enhancing risk awareness in dealing with emergencies, testing and optimizing emergency plans, enhancing emergency response capabilities, running-in mechanisms, training teams, and reducing possible losses in actual emergencies through simulations.

[0018] As an optional embodiment: the plan assessment module includes a risk assessment unit and an emergency plan unit, and the risk assessment unit is used to quantitatively analyze the potential risks of the emergency plan of the power enterprise in the emergency plan, specifically: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the total evaluation score Q of the emergency plan; in To use the plan responsibility value, To use the content value of the plan, is the plan process value, is the emergency event value; it should be noted that, in this embodiment, various risk factors can be comprehensively considered instead of focusing on a single maximum risk. This method helps to provide a more comprehensive perspective and ensure that all relevant risk factors are taken into consideration; not using a weighted superposition method avoids the complexity of determining weights, simplifies the risk assessment process, and provides an intuitive method to observe the contribution of different risk factors to the total risk. This method is easy to understand and explain, and is conducive to communication between stakeholders. This method allows power companies in emergency plans to flexibly adjust risk assessment models according to their own risk management strategies and goals; Transmitting the total evaluation score Q to the emergency plan unit; The emergency plan unit is used to formulate a corresponding emergency plan according to the quantitative analysis results of the risk assessment unit.

[0019] As an optional embodiment: The specific way to obtain is as follows: According to the formula ; ; ; ; Calculate and obtain The value of is the authenticity value, For practical value, is the compliance value, is the validity value, is a guideline value; it should be noted that , by considering the product of likelihood and severity to assess the magnitude of the risk, Assessing risk by considering the interaction of the three dimensions provides a more comprehensive perspective. By combining likelihood, severity, control measures and frequency of exposure, the risk Assess risk by combining probability and impact; It should also be noted that The value of can be the probability of historical accidents. The value of can be the number of casualties caused by the accident. The value of can be the proportion of working time of power enterprise staff in dangerous environment in the emergency plan. The value of can be the impact of the accident on individual health. The value of can be used to determine the effectiveness of preventive measures. The value of can be obtained by combining the external threats of the power company in the emergency plan, such as natural disasters and terrorist attacks, internal threats, such as equipment failures, human errors, and the vulnerability of assets to threats, and the weak links in the system or process to obtain the risk probability. Specifically, it can be obtained by weighted calculation. The value of can be obtained based on the importance of the asset to the operation of the power company in the emergency plan, the market value and replacement cost of the asset, the severity of the vulnerability, the impact of the vulnerability on the safety of the asset, and the resources and time required to repair the vulnerability. It can be obtained through weighted calculation.

[0020] As an optional embodiment: the specific working mode of the emergency plan unit is as follows: The risk level of the power enterprises in the emergency plan is divided according to the total assessment score Q, specifically into low risk, medium risk and high risk; it should be noted that, in this embodiment, the level division method can be to set a range of the total assessment score Q in advance, which can be 20 to 80 in this embodiment. If the total assessment score Q is within the range, it is medium risk. If the total assessment score Q is greater than the maximum value of the range, it is marked as high risk. Similarly, if the total assessment score Q is less than the maximum value of the range, it is marked as low risk. The resource evaluation value R and the assistance capacity value A of the emergency plan are obtained; it should be noted that, in this embodiment, the resource evaluation value R can quantify the resource capacity of the emergency plan, which is conducive to the optimization of subsequent resource allocation, and the assistance capacity value A can quantify the external assistance that can be relied on in an emergency, as well as the reliability of such assistance, which is conducive to the comprehensiveness and effectiveness of the subsequent emergency plan; Standardize the risk score to obtain the standardized total assessment score ; It should be noted that, in this embodiment, the normalization method may be to divide the total assessment score Q by the maximum possible value of the risk score; According to the formula , get the total evaluation value P of the plan content, where , and is the preset weight coefficient; it should be noted that the total evaluation value P of the plan content is obtained by The resource assessment value R and the assistance capacity value A are considered comprehensively to quantify the risk and emergency preparedness status of power enterprises in emergency plans, and can be used to determine the priority of plans. For example, a higher P value indicates that more attention and resources are needed to prepare for and respond to potential risks. It should also be noted that it can help decision makers make reasonable allocation decisions under limited resources. According to the value of, those areas with higher P values ​​can be prioritized to ensure that key resources are used where they are most needed; It is also possible to periodically evaluate the total value P of the plan content and identify possible deficiencies in the plan by setting thresholds for judgment; It should also be noted that , and It is used to balance the importance of the three factors and ensure that the plan can fully consider various situations. In this embodiment, the specific value can be , and ; A threshold value P of the total evaluation value of the plan content is set in advance. If the total evaluation value P of the plan content is greater than the threshold, the emergency plan is judged to meet the requirements, otherwise it is adjusted. It should be noted that specific adjustment strategies can also be implemented according to the risk level of the emergency plan. Specifically, according to different risk levels (low, medium, and high), corresponding strategy sets are selected. The strategy set under each risk level may include specific actions such as evacuation, rescue, communication, and resource allocation; Set different risk levels (low, medium, high) in advance to correspond to the required resource requirements; Compare resource demand with current resource assessment value R to obtain resource gap; Arrange the total evaluation value P of the plan contents from large to small, and purchase or supplement resources from outside according to priority and resource gap; It should also be noted that the specific implementation part of the priority value P of the specific response strategy plan is , and It can affect the selection and priority of strategies in the response strategy. For example, in this embodiment Corresponding standardized total assessment score If the weight is high, it means that risk assessment plays a dominant role in the formulation of emergency plans, and more active strategies are chosen in the implementation of specific response strategies; Moreover, the specific response strategy can be dynamically adjusted according to the evaluation results of the total value P of the plan content, which can be adjusted by , and To optimize the choice of specific response strategies.

[0021] As an optional embodiment: the specific method of obtaining the resource evaluation value R is as follows: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the resource evaluation value R, where n is the total number of resources, represents the effectiveness score of the i-th resource, is the number of the i-th resource. It should be noted that, in this embodiment, the number of n is 5, the value of i is an integer from 1 to 5, and in this embodiment, the resources are human resources, material resources, equipment resources, transportation resources and communication resources in order of type. In this embodiment, human resources are obtained by the number of emergency response team members, material resources are obtained by the inventory of medical materials, equipment resources are obtained by the number of emergency equipment, transportation resources are obtained by the number of available transportation vehicles, and communication resources are obtained by the number of communication equipment; The effectiveness scores of the corresponding resources can be obtained by scoring the professional skills and emergency experience of team members for human resources, scoring the applicability and quality of materials for material resources, scoring the performance and maintenance status of equipment resources, scoring the availability and rapid deployment capability of vehicles for transportation resources, and scoring the coverage and reliability of communication equipment for communication resources. The above scores are obtained through staff evaluation and are any integers from 1 to 10. It should also be noted that such calculations can accurately quantify the resource assessment within the power company in the emergency plan, which will then facilitate subsequent evaluations.

[0022] As an optional embodiment: the specific method of obtaining the assistance capability value A is as follows: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the assistance capability value A, where m is the total number of assistance sources, represents the effectiveness score of the j-th aid source, is the response capability of the jth aid source. It should be noted that, in this embodiment, the number of m is 5, and the value of j is an integer from 1 to 5. In this embodiment, the aid sources are government aid, power company aid, volunteer organization, international aid and non-governmental organization aid in the emergency plan. The corresponding response capability of each aid source can be the response capability of the local government emergency department, the material support capability of the cooperative emergency plan, the manpower mobilization capability of the volunteer organization, the rescue capability of the international aid agency and the professional rescue capability of the non-governmental organization. The above scores are obtained through staff evaluation, which are any integers from 1 to 10. The effectiveness score of the corresponding aid resources can be obtained by the reliability and timeliness score of government aid, the response speed and quality score of power company aid in the emergency plan, the coordination and efficiency score of volunteers, the arrival speed and resource adequacy score of international aid, and the reliability and professional ability score of non-governmental organizations; the above scores are obtained through staff evaluation and are any integers from 1 to 10; By assigning numerical values ​​to resources and sources of assistance, their contribution to emergency response can be evaluated more objectively. All types of resources and sources of assistance are taken into account to ensure that no important factors are missed in the evaluation. A unified scoring system is provided so that different resources and sources of assistance can be compared. The calculation results can be used to determine which resources or sources of assistance are the most critical and need to be prioritized.

[0023] As an optional embodiment: the specific working mode of the feedback module is as follows: First, all relevant data are collected from the online collaboration unit; it should be noted that in this embodiment, the relevant data includes but is not limited to the drill time, performance of participants, resource usage, response time, etc.; The overall score G of the collaborative exercise process is obtained based on the collected relevant data; it should be noted that, in this embodiment, the overall exercise score provides a comprehensive evaluation of the entire collaborative exercise performance; According to the formula , calculate and obtain the feedback adjustment coefficient ,in The coefficient of influence of feedback on plan adjustment; It should also be noted that the total score G of the exercise process can be obtained in five aspects: "exercise plan, scenario design, participants, response actions, and proficiency". Each aspect includes five dimensions: "authenticity, practicality, compliance, effectiveness, and guidance". Among them, the exercise process includes 12 sub-items: Early warning reports; Emergency mobilization; Monitoring and assessment; command and coordination; On-site disposal measures; Personnel rescue; alert control; emergency resource management; Emergency communications; Information disclosure; Site control and recovery; Safety management during the drill; To evaluate the score of a certain dimension, click on the ☆ to change it to ★. Each ★ is scored as "2 points". The total score of all ★ in the evaluation of the exercise process is "160 points". The total score of the evaluation of the plan content and the evaluation of the exercise process is "210 points"; The exercise unit can set the passing score of the assessment by itself. For example, 160 points are required to pass. In addition to "guidance", all four dimensions of "authenticity, practicality, compliance, and effectiveness" must be ★; Exercise Evaluation Conclusion According to the conditions set by the drill unit, click "Drill Conclusion". For example, if 160 points are passed, all four dimensions, "authenticity, practicality, compliance, and effectiveness", except for "guidance" need to be ★. The platform will automatically generate "Drill Conclusion: After the rectification and acceptance of existing problems, this drill has passed"; According to the conditions set by the exercise unit, click "Exercise Conclusion". For example, if you pass with 160 points, except for "guidance", all four dimensions of "authenticity, practicality, compliance, and effectiveness" must be ★ to be "passed"; and in this exercise, one of the four dimensions of "authenticity, practicality, compliance, and effectiveness" is ☆, the platform will automatically generate "Exercise Conclusion: This exercise failed"; If the application fails, the 12 items with scores lower than the historical average will be output as written correction opinions; According to the formula , calculate and obtain the total evaluation value of the optimized plan content , the total value of the optimized plan content evaluation Substitute it into the plan assessment module for assessment. It should be noted that the adjustment coefficient directly reflects the improvement that needs to be added to the current plan, making the plan optimization process quantifiable and operational, by considering the lessons learned from the drill and converting them into specific improvements to the plan; It should also be noted that a systematic approach is provided to improve the plan based on the results of the exercise, converting qualitative feedback into quantitative adjustment factors for easy understanding and application, allowing the plan to be flexibly adjusted based on the results of the exercise and feedback, rather than relying solely on periodic large-scale revisions. By continuously optimizing the plan, the risks that may be faced in the future can be better managed, allowing the plan to adapt to the changing environment and emerging challenges.

[0024] As an optional embodiment: the specific method of obtaining the total score G of the collaborative exercise process is as follows: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the total score G of the collaborative exercise process; Where V is the number of key indicators of the total score of the collaborative exercise process, It is The weight of the key indicators, It is The score of each key indicator; it should be noted that in this implementation, the score of the key indicator is obtained by subtracting the minimum value of the indicator from the actual data, divided by the maximum value of the indicator from the actual data, and multiplied by 100%. The weight of the key indicator is obtained through staff evaluation, ranging from 0 to 1, and the sum of all weights is 1; It should also be noted that the actual performance was compared with the expected maximum and minimum values ​​to quantify the performance of each key indicator and make it a comparable value. The different key indicators were converted to a common scale (0 to 100%) by subtracting the minimum expected value from the actual performance and then dividing it by the expected maximum range (i.e., the difference between the maximum and minimum values) to facilitate comparison. When calculating the total score of the exercise process, different key indicators were assigned different weights to reflect the relative importance of each indicator in the overall evaluation, ensuring that the evaluation results can reflect the most important aspects. The scores of all key indicators were combined through weighted summation to obtain an overall score for the exercise process. This score provides a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of the entire collaborative exercise.

[0025] As an optional embodiment: it also includes a comprehensive management module, which is used to improve the standardization of emergency drills of power companies in emergency plans through information technology, and the specific steps are: First, search for laws and regulations, then establish a management system; Finally, the simultaneous generation of drill records and on-site formation of evaluation reports are achieved to ensure the authenticity and reliability of the data.

[0026] It should be noted that through standardized processes, the standardization and professionalism of emergency drills can be improved; the drill materials stored online are easy to query and manage, avoiding the risk of data loss; through continuous evaluation and rectification, the continuous improvement and optimization of emergency drills are promoted; systematic drill management enhances the seriousness and tense atmosphere of the drills, and increases the attention of participants; complete drill records and data preservation help avoid the risk of accountability caused by data problems, so that power companies in emergency plans can carry out emergency drills more professionally and in a standardized manner, effectively improving the level of emergency management and emergency response capabilities.

[0027] As an optional embodiment: the process of querying laws and regulations and then establishing a management system is as follows: Obtain national laws, regulations, industry standards and local policies related to emergency drills for power companies in emergency plans; Use the legal and regulatory query function in the power company emergency drill management system in the emergency plan to search and obtain the latest legal and regulatory information; Assess the compliance of existing management systems and operating procedures with laws and regulations, and identify gaps and potential compliance risks.

[0028] Working principle: Help power companies to comprehensively consider possible emergencies, improve the pertinence and practicality of emergency plans, and ensure that the contents of emergency plans are close to actual needs. The emergency drill management system for power companies can effectively solve problems such as incomplete emergency plan content, lack of pertinence, and imperfect drill evaluation and feedback mechanisms, and improve the emergency management and response capabilities of power companies.

[0029] The above are only preferred implementations of the present invention. The protection scope of the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments. All technical solutions under the concept of the present invention belong to the protection scope of the present invention. It should be pointed out that for ordinary technicians in this technical field, some improvements and modifications without departing from the principle of the present invention should also be regarded as the protection scope of this template.

Claims

1. An Internet-based emergency drill management system for power companies. It is characterized in that It includes a plan collection module, which is used to collect information on emergency plans of power companies; A plan evaluation module, which is used to evaluate the emergency plan; A feedback module is used to generate feedback modification suggestions based on the results of the plan evaluation module.

2. According to the Internet-based emergency drill management system for electric power enterprises as described in claim 1, It is characterized in that The plan assessment module includes a risk assessment unit and an emergency plan unit. The risk assessment unit is used to quantitatively analyze the potential risks of the emergency plan of the power enterprise, specifically: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the total evaluation score Q of the emergency plan; in To use the plan responsibility value, To use the content value of the plan, is the plan process value, is the emergency value; Transmitting the total evaluation score Q to the emergency plan unit; The emergency plan unit is used to formulate a corresponding emergency plan according to the quantitative analysis results of the risk assessment unit.

3. According to the Internet-based emergency drill management system for electric power enterprises as described in claim 2, It is characterized in that Said The specific way to obtain is as follows: According to the formula ; ； ； ； Calculate and obtain The value of is the authenticity value, For practical value, is the compliance value, is the validity value, It is a guide value.

4. According to the Internet-based power enterprise emergency drill management system of claim 1, It is characterized in that The specific working mode of the emergency plan unit is as follows: Obtain the resource assessment value R and assistance capacity value A of the emergency plan; Standardize the risk score to obtain the standardized total assessment score ; According to the formula , get the total evaluation value P of the plan content, where , and is the preset weight coefficient; A threshold value P of the total evaluation value of the plan content is set in advance. If the total evaluation value P of the plan content is greater than the threshold, the emergency plan is judged to meet the requirements, otherwise it is adjusted. Arrange the total evaluation value P of the plan contents from large to small, and purchase or supplement resources from outside according to priority and resource gaps.

5. According to claim 4, an Internet-based emergency drill management system for electric power enterprises, It is characterized in that The specific method of obtaining the resource evaluation value R is as follows: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the resource evaluation value R, where n is the total number of resources, represents the effectiveness score of the i-th resource, is the number of the i-th resource.

6. According to claim 4, an Internet-based emergency drill management system for electric power enterprises, It is characterized in that The specific method of obtaining the assistance capability value A is as follows: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the assistance capability value A, where m is the total number of assistance sources, represents the effectiveness score of the j-th aid source, is the responsiveness of the jth assistance source.

7. According to claim 1, an Internet-based power enterprise emergency drill management system, It is characterized in that The specific working mode of the feedback module is as follows: First, all relevant data were collected from the online collaborative unit; The total score G of the collaborative exercise process is obtained based on the collected relevant data; According to the formula , calculate and obtain the feedback adjustment coefficient ,in The coefficient of influence of feedback on plan adjustment; According to the formula , calculate and obtain the total evaluation value of the optimized plan content , the total value of the optimized plan content evaluation Substitute into the plan evaluation module for evaluation.

8. According to claim 7, an Internet-based emergency drill management system for electric power enterprises, It is characterized in that The specific method for obtaining the total score G of the collaborative exercise process is as follows: According to the formula , calculate and obtain the total score G of the collaborative exercise process; Where V is the number of key indicators of the total score of the collaborative exercise process, It is The weight of the key indicators, It is The scores of key indicators.

9. The Internet-based emergency drill management system for electric power enterprises according to claim 1, It is characterized in that It also includes a comprehensive management module, which is used to improve the standardization of emergency drills of power companies in emergency plans through information technology. The specific steps are: First, search for laws and regulations, then establish a management system; Finally, the simultaneous generation of drill records and on-site formation of evaluation reports are achieved to ensure the authenticity and reliability of the data.

10. The Internet-based emergency drill management system for electric power enterprises according to claim 1, It is characterized in that The process of querying laws and regulations and then establishing a management system is as follows: Obtain national laws, regulations, industry standards and local policies related to emergency drills for power companies in emergency plans; Use the legal and regulatory query function in the power company emergency drill management system in the emergency plan to search and obtain the latest legal and regulatory information; Assess the compliance of existing management systems and operating procedures with laws and regulations, and identify gaps and potential compliance risks.

Images