A function-based air defense equipment system construction system

Abstract

The application discloses a kind of construction systems of function-based air defense equipment system, comprising: equipment relationship definition module: for defining the basic information of air defense equipment, according to the visualization structure of air defense equipment of basic information establishment;Equipment function definition module: for defining the function function of air defense equipment, according to the parameter of function function Establishment function flow view;The parameter of function function includes execution equipment ID, target equipment ID and task instruction;Demand confirmation module: for obtaining operational requirement from management interface, generates air defense equipment system;Operational requirement includes air defense operational task and system operational capability requirement;System logic construction module: for extracting the basic information of air defense equipment according to operational requirement, visualize air defense equipment and operational task, constitute air defense equipment system.According to the above technical scheme, the completeness of system equipment element can be verified to undertake system operational capability, improve the compactness of air defense equipment system structure and the reliability of function implementation.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of air defense equipment management, and more specifically, to a system for constructing a function-based air defense equipment system. Background Technology

[0002] The key to air defense equipment system architecture design lies in selecting appropriate equipment from air defense equipment with different functional performance indicators based on combat capability requirements and defense operation procedures. This system includes major subsystems such as early warning and detection, command and control, interception and destruction, and electronic countermeasures. It can determine and optimize the composition and relationship of air defense equipment according to a specified process, with the goal of optimal combat capability, so that the air defense equipment system can achieve combat missions more efficiently and without waste of air defense equipment in the process of achieving the mission.

[0003] However, the number and types of air defense equipment capable of supporting system-wide combat capabilities are numerous. Under different types and quantities of equipment elements, the solution space for the combination and relationships of these elements is large, leading to uncertainties in the performance of the functional components constituting the system. For example, when the state of one piece of equipment changes, the impact on the system's combat capability cannot be predicted. Furthermore, in practical applications, with the increasing complexity and variability of operational requirements and modes, the composition and relationships of air defense equipment elements need adaptive and dynamic adjustments. Existing design verification methods for air defense equipment system components and their relationships generally employ logical view models, which can meet the requirements for design efficiency and dynamic adjustment of system elements and their relationships. However, they have the following shortcomings: 1) The support relationship between the view model and the system architecture design process is unclear; the system architecture view model modeling is disconnected from the system architecture design process, resulting in low rationality of the system architecture design results; 2) Logical verification methods based on view models lack quantitative information such as quantity, scale, space, and time, making it difficult to quantitatively evaluate the degree of satisfaction with system combat capabilities; the system architecture verification is incomplete, and the reliability of the results is low; 3) There is a lack of a mapping view model from combat capability to system and system function, resulting in insufficient verification of the completeness of system equipment elements in undertaking system combat capabilities. Summary of the Invention

[0004] To address the aforementioned problems, this application provides a system for constructing a function-based air defense equipment system, comprising:

[0005] Equipment Relationship Definition Module: Used to define the basic information of air defense equipment and establish a visual structure of the air defense equipment based on the basic information; the basic information includes equipment ID, equipment name, equipment category, mission attributes, performance indicators, associated equipment ID, relationship, and equipment status; mission attributes include executor, mission content, and the corresponding task; the mission content includes: target detection, target tracking, target identification, information processing, command decision-making, effect evaluation, and decision-making; the task corresponding to the mission content is defined through functional functions; a subsystem consists of a combination of one or more air defense equipment.

[0006] Equipment Function Definition Module: Used to define the function functions of air defense equipment and establish a function flow view based on the parameters of the function functions; the parameters of the function functions include the executing equipment ID, the target equipment ID, and the mission command;

[0007] Requirements Confirmation Module: Used to obtain operational requirements from the management interface and generate an air defense equipment system; operational requirements include air defense combat missions and system combat capability requirements;

[0008] System logic construction module: used to extract basic information of air defense equipment according to combat requirements, visualize air defense equipment and combat missions, and form an air defense equipment system;

[0009] The air defense equipment system includes: early warning and detection subsystem, interception and countermeasure subsystem, command and control subsystem, and basic support subsystem.

[0010] The equipment relationship definition module includes:

[0011] Data structure unit: used to manage and store basic information about air defense equipment;

[0012] Data Relationship Unit: Used to establish relationships between air defense equipment. The relationships between air defense equipment include association relationships and task relationships. Association relationships are defined in the basic information, and task relationships are defined in the function.

[0013] Visualization processing unit: used to form a topology between equipment, between equipment functions, and between equipment and requirements based on the basic information of the air defense equipment, and output it to the display terminal as needed.

[0014] Furthermore, when the data relationship unit establishes the task relationship between air defense equipment, multiple functional functions interact and call each other according to the time sequence to form a functional flow when the specified combat function is realized; the functional flow view is a view that takes the realization of combat mission as the main line and reflects the data flow logic with executors, functional function combinations, and event interactions; combat functions include: early warning detection, command and control, interception and countermeasures, and basic support.

[0015] The equipment function definition module includes:

[0016] Function flow definition unit: used to define the operational mission flow for operational functions. The nodes of the operational mission flow consist of executing equipment and function functions. Interactive data is input to the function functions of the executing equipment. The function functions execute the action commands of the air defense equipment and update the status information according to the interactive data. When the function functions of each node interact with each other, event interactions are formed between the nodes. The functional flow view can be represented by tree structure and sequence diagram.

[0017] Functional flow verification unit: used to demonstrate the three-dimensional mapping relationship between combat operations, air defense equipment nodes and equipment functions, and to verify whether the information exchange between air defense equipment is effective when executing combat mission procedures.

[0018] Furthermore, there are event interactions between different subsystems, including: the data interaction between the early warning and detection subsystem and the interception and countermeasure subsystem includes information sharing, information reporting, and information distribution; the data interaction between the command and control subsystem and the early warning and detection subsystem and the interception and countermeasure subsystem includes command decision commands.

[0019] The requirement confirmation module includes:

[0020] Requirements decomposition unit: Obtain operational requirements, and analyze the air defense combat mission and system combat capability requirements from the operational requirements;

[0021] Requirements Implementation Unit: Select air defense equipment function items according to the system's combat capability requirements, extract function values, and select candidate air defense equipment elements; extract and form function flows according to the combat mission, generate function flow views, and construct the air defense equipment system.

[0022] The system logic construction module includes:

[0023] System optimization unit: The air defense equipment view model of the air defense equipment system is converted into a heterogeneous network model. The conversion method includes: using air defense equipment as nodes and the information interaction between air defense equipment as the connection relationship to construct a heterogeneous network model; the connection relationship includes detection edge, information edge, command and control edge, and interception edge.

[0024] When determining the connection relationships in the system optimization unit, the air defense equipment in the view model is used as nodes, and the relationship between the target and the equipment elements of the early warning and detection subsystem is used as the detection edge; the interactive relationship between the early warning and detection subsystem, the interception and countermeasure subsystem and the command and control equipment elements, such as information sharing, information reporting and information distribution, is used as the information edge; the command and control decision commands between different command and control equipment elements and between the command and control equipment elements and the early warning and detection subsystem, the interception and countermeasure subsystem are used as the command and control edge; and the relationship between the target and the interception and countermeasure elements is used as the interception edge.

[0025] System architecture simulation unit: Converts the functional flow view of the air defense equipment system into a physical model in the simulation scenario, conducts simulation tests and combat effectiveness assessments under typical combat scenarios, and verifies the system's combat capability in large-scale confrontation.

[0026] Furthermore, after the requirement fulfillment unit generates the air defense equipment system, it also determines whether the functional flow can fulfill the operational requirements, including: checking the mapping view or functional relationship mapping table to see if there are any situations where there are no corresponding air defense equipment for the operational requirements. If there are no corresponding situations, the coverage verification of the equipment element functions to the system's operational capabilities can be achieved.

[0027] The present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0028] 1) This invention organically integrates the view model, complex network model, and system adversarial simulation model into the system architecture design and verification process. Through the trial and error of multiple design-verification loops and the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, it improves the system's flexibility, adaptability, and iterative evolution capabilities.

[0029] 2) Construct a mapping view model from combat capabilities to systems and system functions using tables, views, and other model formats to verify the completeness of the system equipment elements in undertaking system combat capabilities. Attached Figure Description

[0030] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the construction system structure of the air defense equipment system provided in the embodiment of the present invention;

[0031] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the basic information data structure of air defense equipment in an air defense equipment system provided according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0032] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the air defense equipment system provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0033] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the functional flow data structure provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0034] Figure 5 This is a functional breakdown diagram of an air defense equipment system provided according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0035] Figure 6 This is a mapping view of operational requirements and functions provided according to embodiments of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0036] The specific implementation of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0037] The structure of the function-based air defense equipment system construction system provided by this invention is as follows: Figure 1As shown, it includes:

[0038] P100: Equipment Relationship Definition Module: Used to define the basic information of air defense equipment and establish the visual structure of the air defense equipment based on the basic information;

[0039] Basic information includes equipment ID, equipment name, equipment category, mission attributes, performance indicators, associated equipment IDs, relationships, and equipment status; the data structure of basic information is as follows: Figure 2 As shown, multiple air defense equipment can be associated with each other by associating equipment IDs;

[0040] Specifically, equipment names such as Early Warning Radar-1 and Early Warning Radar-2, and equipment categories include: early warning radar, tracking radar, detection radar, etc., with performance indicators corresponding to the equipment category. For example, the performance indicators of a detection radar include information related to the detection function, such as detection range and detection accuracy, while the performance indicators of a tracking radar include information related to the tracking function, such as tracking range and tracking accuracy. The working status of air defense equipment includes ready, search, track, shut down, and transfer. Specifically, Early Warning Radar-1 belongs to the category of early warning radar, and its detection function is characterized by tracking range and tracking accuracy, with a tracking range of 5km and a tracking accuracy of 100m.

[0041] The mission attributes of air defense equipment include the executor, mission content, and the corresponding task. Generally, the executor is the equipment ID. The mission content includes target detection, target tracking, target identification, information processing, command and decision-making, effect evaluation, and decision-making. The task corresponding to the content is defined through a function, the parameters of which include the executing equipment ID, the target equipment ID, and the mission instruction. The function of an air defense equipment is determined by the content of its mission attributes. When defining the attributes of an air defense equipment, its content can be determined based on the mission instruction of the function.

[0042] Generally, a combination of air defense equipment corresponding to one or more equipment IDs constitutes a subsystem; that is, a group of functionally related air defense equipment constitutes a subsystem, and multiple subsystems constitute an air defense equipment system, such as... Figure 3 As shown: Air defense equipment with target detection, target tracking and target identification functions can be used to form an early warning and detection subsystem; by adding the above air defense equipment into the functional flow of the early warning and detection subsystem, the early warning and detection subsystem can have relevant combat functions, such as early warning and detection capabilities and tracking and identification capabilities.

[0043] Based on the achievable combat functions, this invention includes four subsystems: early warning and detection subsystem, interception and countermeasure subsystem, command and control subsystem, and basic support subsystem.

[0044] Specifically, the equipment relationship definition module includes:

[0045] P101: Data structure unit: used to define and store basic information about air defense equipment;

[0046] P102: Data Relationship Unit: Used to establish the relationship between the air defense equipment. The data relationship between the air defense equipment includes association relationship and task relationship.

[0047] like Figure 2 As shown, the relationship between the equipment ID and the associated equipment ID stored in the basic information is an association relationship;

[0048] The task relationship is defined in the function as the relationship between the execution equipment ID and the target equipment ID.

[0049] P103: Visualization Processing Unit: Used to form a network or tree-like topology structure between equipment, between equipment functions, and between equipment and requirements based on the data relationships reflected in the basic information of air defense equipment, and output it to the display terminal as needed.

[0050] P110: Equipment Function Definition Module: Used to define the function functions of air defense equipment, including the parameters and corresponding instructions of the function functions, and to establish a function flow view based on the parameters of the function functions; such as Figure 4 As shown, multiple function calls are made according to a time sequence to form a function flow when a specified combat function is implemented. The function flow view is a view that takes the implementation of combat missions as the main line and reflects the data flow logic through executors, function function combinations, and data interactions. The function flow view can be represented in the form of tree structure, sequence diagram, etc.

[0051] The operational functions that functional flows can achieve include: early warning and detection, command and control, interception and countermeasures, and basic support.

[0052] Specifically, the equipment function definition module includes:

[0053] P111: Function Flow Definition Unit: Used to define the operational mission flow for operational functions. The nodes of the operational mission flow consist of executing equipment and function functions. Interactive data (parameters of the function functions) is input to the function functions of the executing equipment. The function functions execute the action instructions of the air defense equipment according to the interactive data, and update the basic information and status information of the air defense equipment according to the action instructions. After the current air defense equipment completes its mission, one or more air defense equipment are designated to execute the function functions next. When the function functions of each node interact with each other, event interactions are formed between the nodes.

[0054] There are also event interactions between different subsystems. For example, the data interaction between the early warning and detection subsystem and the interception and countermeasure subsystem includes information sharing, information reporting, and information distribution; the data interaction between the command and control subsystem and the early warning and detection subsystem and the interception and countermeasure subsystem includes command decision commands.

[0055] In a functional flow, the state of an air defense device can transition: for example, a radar device defaults to the ready state; when it receives a detection command from a functional function, it enters the search state; when the target enters the detection range, it detects the target and reports it to the command and control equipment; when it receives a tracking command, it enters the tracking state; when it receives a shutdown or mission end command, it enters the end state.

[0056] The timing sequence is the order in which multiple air defense equipment response functions are defined according to the chronological order of events.

[0057] P112: Functional Flow Verification Unit: Used to demonstrate the ternary mapping relationship between combat operations, air defense equipment nodes, and equipment functions, and to verify whether the information interaction between the air defense equipment is effective when executing combat missions.

[0058] P120: Requirements Confirmation Module: Used to obtain operational requirements from the management interface and generate an air defense equipment system; the operational requirements include air defense operational tasks and system operational capability requirements; if the operational task does not exist in the equipment function definition module, the operational task is created in the equipment function definition module.

[0059] The requirements confirmation module includes:

[0060] P121: Requirements Decomposition Unit: Obtain operational requirements, and analyze the air defense operational tasks and system operational capability requirements from the operational requirements;

[0061] In this invention, operational requirements refer to the operational capabilities of an air defense equipment system. These requirements are achieved through a requirement decomposition unit, which selects functional flow combinations corresponding to the operational capabilities. In this invention, the basic operational functions that have been determined to be achievable by the functional flows include four main categories: early warning and detection, command and control, interception and countermeasures, and basic support. Figure 5 As shown, functions can be selected and combined from existing functional flows according to the combat mission, or functional functions can be established and new functional flows can be created based on the basic information of existing air defense equipment to meet specific combat requirements.

[0062] In this embodiment, the early warning and detection subsystem generally includes functions such as target detection, target tracking, and target identification, which can support early warning and detection capabilities as well as tracking and identification capabilities; the command and control subsystem generally includes functions such as information processing, command decision-making, and effect evaluation, which can support command and control capabilities as well as operational evaluation capabilities; the interception and countermeasure subsystem generally includes functions such as fire decision-making, target destruction, result evaluation, and comprehensive support, which can support interception and countermeasure capabilities, operational evaluation capabilities, and comprehensive support capabilities; and the basic support subsystem generally includes functions such as communication support, navigation and positioning, and system simulation, which can support comprehensive support capabilities and system simulation capabilities.

[0063] P122: Requirement Implementation Unit: Analyze the system's combat capability requirements, select air defense equipment function items, extract function values, and then select candidate air defense equipment elements; analyze the combat mission, extract and form a function flow, and combine the air defense equipment to generate the parameters of the function functions in the nodes of the function flow;

[0064] When selecting air defense equipment features, the conditions of the air defense equipment should also be considered, including the status, mission attributes, and performance indicators of the air defense equipment.

[0065] The functional flow view corresponding to the functional flow is used to construct and generate an air defense equipment system.

[0066] After generating the air defense equipment system, it also involves, for example... Figure 6 The tree-like mapping view shown can determine whether the functional flow can meet the operational requirements, and Table 1 can also be used to determine whether the current air defense equipment composition can meet the operational requirements.

[0067] Table 1: Functional Relationship Mapping Table

[0068]

[0069] The specific judgment process includes: checking the mapping view or functional relationship mapping table to see if there are any operational requirements without corresponding air defense equipment. If no such cases exist, the coverage of equipment element functions with the system's operational capabilities can be verified. If there are operational requirement items that are not fully corresponding, the operational mission flow needs to be supplemented and defined. On the other hand, the judgment process can also determine whether any air defense equipment functions are not involved in the realization of operational requirements. For example, as shown in Table 1, if the row containing the air defense equipment function item does not have a corresponding operational requirement column, it is necessary to analyze whether the air defense equipment is being wasted in the system.

[0070] P130: System Logic Construction Module: Used to extract basic information of air defense equipment according to combat requirements, visualize the air defense equipment and combat missions, and construct an air defense equipment system.

[0071] The system logic construction module includes:

[0072] P131: System Optimization Unit: Converts the air defense equipment view model of the air defense equipment system into a heterogeneous network model. The conversion method includes: constructing a heterogeneous network model with air defense equipment as nodes and information interaction between air defense equipment as edge relationships; the edge relationships are generally divided into detection edge, information edge, command and control edge, and interception edge.

[0073] Specifically, the air defense equipment in the view model is taken as nodes, the relationship between the target and the equipment elements of the early warning and detection subsystem is taken as the detection edge; the interactive relationship between the early warning and detection subsystem, the interception and countermeasure subsystem and the command and control equipment elements, such as information sharing, information reporting and information distribution, is taken as the information edge; the command and control decision commands between different command and control equipment elements and between command and control equipment elements and the early warning and detection subsystem, the interception and countermeasure subsystem are taken as the command and control edge; and the relationship between the target and the interception and countermeasure elements is taken as the interception edge.

[0074] The vulnerability and balance of the system architecture are analyzed by network characteristic parameters, and the relationship between air defense equipment elements is optimized based on the results. The network characteristic parameters include: degree distribution, betweenness, and number of connected segments.

[0075] P132: System Architecture Simulation Unit: Converts the functional flow view of the air defense equipment system into an entity model in the simulation scenario, i.e., the system confrontation simulation system, conducts simulation tests and combat effectiveness assessments under typical combat scenarios, and verifies the system's combat capability in large-scale confrontation.

[0076] In this invention, a view model, a complex network model, and a system-on-system confrontation simulation model are integrated into the construction system of an air defense equipment system. Starting from the basic information of air defense equipment, functional functions are designed, and the relationships between different meanings of air defense equipment are flexibly defined. The functional flow of function implementation is realized through ordered functional functions. Combined with verification methods, the flexibility of the air defense equipment system is improved. On the other hand, the operational requirements are decomposed, and the completion status of existing functions for operational requirements is verified. This allows for a systematic verification of the completeness of the system equipment elements in undertaking the system's operational capabilities, further improving the structural compactness and functional reliability of the air defense equipment system implemented through the construction system of this invention.

[0077] The above-disclosed embodiments are merely a few specific examples of the present invention. However, the present invention is not limited thereto, and any variations that can be conceived by those skilled in the art should fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A function-based air defense equipment system construction system, characterized by, The application comprises: An equipment relationship definition module: used for defining basic information of air defense equipment, and establishing a visual structure of the air defense equipment according to the basic information; The basic information comprises equipment ID, equipment name, equipment category, task attribute, performance index, associated equipment ID, association relationship and equipment state; The task attribute comprises an executor, task content and a task corresponding to the task content, the task content of the task attribute comprises target discovery, target tracking, target identification, information processing, command decision, effect evaluation and decision, and the task corresponding to the task content is defined by a function function; An equipment function definition module: used for defining a function function of the air defense equipment, and establishing a function flow view according to parameters of the function function; the parameters of the function function comprise an executing equipment ID, a target equipment ID and a task instruction; A demand confirmation module: used for obtaining a combat demand from a management interface, and generating an air defense equipment system; the combat demand comprises an air defense combat task and a system combat capability demand; A system logic construction module: used for extracting basic information of the air defense equipment according to the combat demand, visualizing the air defense equipment and the combat task, and constituting an air defense equipment system; The air defense equipment system comprises a warning and detection subsystem, an interception and countermeasure subsystem, a command and control subsystem and a basic support subsystem; The equipment function definition module comprises: A function flow definition unit: used for defining a combat task flow for a combat function, wherein a node of the combat task flow is constituted by an executing equipment and a function function; interactive data is input into the function function of the executing equipment, the function function executes an action instruction and updates state information of the air defense equipment according to the interactive data, and data interaction between the function functions of the nodes forms event interaction between the nodes; A function flow verification unit: used for embodying a ternary mapping relationship between a combat task, an air defense equipment node and an equipment function, and verifying whether information interaction between the air defense equipments is effective when the combat task flow is executed; The demand confirmation module comprises: A demand decomposition unit: used for obtaining a combat demand, and analyzing an air defense combat task and a system combat capability demand from the combat demand; A demand realization unit: used for selecting an air defense equipment function item according to the system combat capability demand, extracting a function value, selecting a candidate air defense equipment element, extracting a function flow according to the combat task, generating a function flow view, and constructing an air defense equipment system; after the air defense equipment system is generated, it is further judged whether the function flow can realize the combat demand, comprising: checking a mapping view or a function relationship mapping table, checking whether there is a case that no air defense equipment corresponds to the combat demand, and if there is no case that no air defense equipment corresponds to the combat demand, the coverage verification of the equipment element function to the system combat capability is realized; The system logic construction module comprises: The system optimization unit converts the air defense equipment view model of the air defense equipment system into a heterogeneous network model, and the conversion includes: taking the air defense equipment as a node and the information interaction between the air defense equipment as a connection relationship to construct a heterogeneous network model; the connection relationship includes: detection edges, information edges, command and control edges, and interception edges; when determining the connection relationship, the air defense equipment in the view model is taken as a node, the relationship between the target and the equipment elements of the early warning detection subsystem is taken as a detection edge, the information sharing, information reporting, and information distribution between the early warning detection subsystem and the interception countermeasure subsystem are taken as information edges, the command and decision commands between different command and control equipment elements and between the command and control equipment elements and the early warning detection subsystem and the interception countermeasure subsystem are taken as command and control edges, and the relationship between the target and the interception countermeasure element is taken as an interception edge; The system architecture simulation unit converts the function flow view constituting the air defense equipment system into an entity model in the simulation scenario, carries out simulation tests and combat effectiveness evaluation in a typical combat scenario, and verifies the combat capability of the system in large-scale confrontation.

2. The construction system of claim 1, wherein, The equipment relationship definition module includes: A data structure unit for managing and storing basic information of air defense equipment; A data relationship unit for establishing relationships between the air defense equipment, including association relationships and task relationships, the association relationships being defined in the basic information, and the task relationships being defined in the function functions; A visualization processing unit for forming a topological structure between equipment, between equipment and equipment functions, and between equipment and requirements according to the basic information of the air defense equipment, and outputting to a display terminal as needed.

3. The construction system according to claim 2, wherein Wherein, When the data relationship unit establishes the task relationship between the air defense equipment, multiple function functions interact and call according to the time sequence, and a function flow is constructed when a specified combat function is implemented; The function flow view is a view that takes the implementation of combat tasks as the main line, and reflects the data flow logic through executors, function function combinations, and event interactions; The combat functions include: early warning detection, command and control, interception countermeasures, and basic support.

4. The construction system of claim 1, wherein, There are event interactions between different subsystems, including: the data interaction between the early warning detection subsystem and the interception countermeasure subsystem includes: information sharing, information reporting, and information distribution; the data interaction between the command and control subsystem command and the early warning detection subsystem and the interception countermeasure subsystem includes command and decision commands.

5. The construction system of claim 1, wherein, The embodiment mode of the function flow view includes: tree structure and sequence diagram.

Images