Purchase supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method and system

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention provides a purchase supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method and system, and belongs to the technical field of digital evaluation. The method comprises the following steps: determining an evaluation system construction rule based on a user demand, and determining each evaluation index for purchasing supply chain energy efficiency evaluation based on the evaluation system construction rule; performing parameter definition and evaluation standard definition on each evaluation index to obtain an evaluation model; collecting current purchase supply chain parameter information, taking the parameter information as an input parameter of the evaluation model, and outputting a corresponding evaluation result; and extracting an evaluation report template based on the evaluation result to generate a corresponding evaluation report, and pushing corresponding early warning information based on the evaluation report. According to the scheme, standardized evaluation and real-time monitoring of the energy efficiency of the purchase supply chain are achieved, the decision-making efficiency and the management level of an enterprise in supply chain management are improved, meanwhile, the capacity of benchmarking the advanced level of the industry is provided, and continuous optimization of the supply chain is promoted.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of digital evaluation, and in particular to a procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method and a procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation system. Background Art

[0002] With the deepening of enterprise information management, especially in large state-owned energy enterprises, the relevant indicator system in the field of material management and procurement has been basically established. These enterprises calculate and display indicators through management cockpits, large screens and other supervision systems to monitor and manage the material procurement process. However, the existing systems and methods have obvious deficiencies in supply chain energy efficiency evaluation. Although the existing solutions can monitor various indicators of procurement and supply chain, these indicators are often independent and lack a unified standardized evaluation system, making it difficult for enterprises to systematically evaluate their own procurement supply chain energy efficiency levels.

[0003] In addition, the existing solutions lack a set of benchmarking evaluation methods, which makes it impossible for enterprises to conduct effective benchmarking analysis with advanced enterprises in the industry when conducting energy efficiency evaluation. In this case, it is difficult for enterprises to accurately measure their own strengths and weaknesses in supply chain energy efficiency management, which affects their ability to continuously improve and optimize supply chain management. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a standardized and benchmarkable supply chain energy efficiency evaluation system and corresponding methods to help enterprises systematically evaluate and improve the energy efficiency level of their procurement supply chain and benchmark with the best practices in the industry. Summary of the invention

[0004] The purpose of the embodiments of the present invention is to provide a procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method and system, so as to at least solve the problem that the existing solutions cannot provide a standardized and benchmarkable supply chain energy efficiency evaluation system and corresponding methods.

[0005] In order to achieve the above-mentioned objectives, the first aspect of the present invention provides a procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method, the method comprising: determining an evaluation system construction rule based on user needs, and determining each evaluation indicator for procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation based on the evaluation system construction rule; performing parameter definition and evaluation standard definition on each evaluation indicator to obtain an evaluation model; collecting current procurement supply chain parameter information, and using the parameter information as an input parameter of the evaluation model, and outputting corresponding evaluation results; extracting an evaluation report template based on the evaluation result to generate a corresponding evaluation report, and pushing corresponding warning information based on the evaluation report.

[0006] Optionally, the evaluation system construction rules include indicator library construction rules, indicator system construction rules and indicator information maintenance rules; wherein, the indicator library includes one or more of an industry table, an indicator first-level business classification table, an indicator second-level business classification table, an indicator domain table and an indicator regulatory dimension table; wherein, the industry table is used to indicate the industry to which the current procurement supply chain belongs based on user needs; the indicator first-level business classification table and the indicator second-level business classification table are used to determine the evaluation objects of the current procurement supply chain based on user needs; the indicator domain table is used to determine the standard indicator type applied for the current procurement supply chain evaluation based on user needs, and the standard indicator type is any one or more of general indicators, industry indicators and enterprise indicators; the regulatory dimension table is used to determine the current procurement supply chain evaluation objectives based on needs, and the evaluation objectives are any one or more of efficiency, effectiveness, compliance, resilience, flexibility, social responsibility and degree of digitization.

[0007] Optionally, the indicator system includes one or more of system code, system description, total weight, total score, status, effective start date, effective end date, version information, system application scope and benchmarking settings.

[0008] Optionally, the indicator information includes one or more of indicator code, indicator description, indicator definition, indicator explanation, first-level business classification code, second-level business classification code, indicator domain code, regulatory dimension code, reference weight, reference score, unit of measurement, effective status, assessment period category, indicator level, superior indicator code, reference logic and indicator dimension.

[0009] Optionally, the parameter definition and evaluation standard definition are performed on each evaluation indicator to obtain an evaluation model, including: defining a parameter file for each evaluation indicator, the parameter file is used to define and manage the properties and rules of each evaluation indicator; in the defined evaluation parameter file, determining the evaluation rules of the indicator, the evaluation rules are any one or more of calculation rules, evaluation conditions, evaluation results and evaluation suggestions; based on the defined evaluation parameter file, establishing evaluation standards for each evaluation indicator; applying the defined evaluation standards to each evaluation indicator to form an evaluation model.

[0010] Optionally, the method of establishing evaluation criteria for each evaluation indicator based on a defined evaluation parameter file includes: selecting an evaluation parameter file related to the current evaluation requirements; determining the overall structure of the evaluation criteria based on the selected parameter file, including one or more of the classification, scope of application, total score, status and effective date of the evaluation criteria; setting specific evaluation criteria in the evaluation criteria for each evaluation indicator, including any one or more of benchmark values, upper and lower limits and calculation rules.

[0011] Optionally, current procurement supply chain parameter information is collected and used as an input parameter of the evaluation model to output corresponding evaluation results, including: classifying the current procurement supply chain parameter information to obtain parameter values ​​corresponding to each evaluation indicator in the evaluation model; performing corresponding evaluation value calculations for each evaluation indicator based on the evaluation criteria of each evaluation indicator to obtain the evaluation value of each evaluation indicator; performing step-by-step weighted calculations based on the indicator level of the evaluation model to obtain the evaluation value of the top-level indicator; and outputting corresponding evaluation results based on the evaluation values ​​of each top-level indicator and the evaluation value of each evaluation indicator.

[0012] Optionally, the method of extracting an evaluation report template based on the evaluation results to generate a corresponding evaluation report, and triggering corresponding early warning rules based on the evaluation report, includes: extracting an evaluation report template based on the evaluation results, determining each preset key indicator, and performing differentiated display on each evaluation result based on the visualization rules of each preset key indicator; judging whether there are abnormal indicators in the evaluation report, and if so, triggering corresponding early warning rules based on the abnormal level corresponding to the abnormal indicator; wherein the early warning rules include: notification form, notification level, calculation rule-condition, notification object and notification content; the notification form is any one or more of platform notification, email notification and SMS notification; the notification level is any one or more of notification, early warning, error, failure and major event.

[0013] The second aspect of the present invention provides a procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation system, the system comprising: a system construction unit, used to determine the evaluation system construction rules based on user needs, and determine the various evaluation indicators used for procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation based on the evaluation system construction rules; a model construction unit, used to perform parameter definition and evaluation standard definition on each evaluation indicator to obtain an evaluation model; an evaluation unit, used to collect current procurement supply chain parameter information, and use the parameter information as an input parameter of the evaluation model to output a corresponding evaluation result; a push unit, used to extract an evaluation report template based on the evaluation result to generate a corresponding evaluation report, and push corresponding warning information based on the evaluation report.

[0014] On the other hand, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon, which, when executed on a computer, enables the computer to execute the above-mentioned procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method.

[0015] Through the above technical solution, the solution of the present invention determines the various evaluation indicators of the procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation by constructing evaluation system rules based on user needs. By performing parameter definition and evaluation standard definition on these indicators, an evaluation model is formed, and the actual collected procurement supply chain parameter information is used as input to output the corresponding evaluation results. Based on the evaluation results, the system can automatically generate an evaluation report and push relevant early warning information based on the report content. This method realizes the standardized evaluation and real-time monitoring of the procurement supply chain energy efficiency, improves the decision-making efficiency and management level of enterprises in supply chain management, and at the same time provides the ability to benchmark with the advanced level of the industry, promoting the continuous optimization of the supply chain.

[0016] Other features and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail in the following detailed description. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0017] The accompanying drawings are used to provide a further understanding of the embodiments of the present invention and constitute a part of the specification. Together with the following specific embodiments, they are used to explain the embodiments of the present invention, but do not constitute a limitation on the embodiments of the present invention. In the accompanying drawings:

[0018] Figure 1 It is a flowchart of the steps of a procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0019] Figure 2 It is a system structure diagram of a procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation system provided by an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0020] The specific implementation of the present invention is described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the specific implementation described here is only used to illustrate and explain the present invention, and is not used to limit the present invention.

[0021] Figure 1 1 is a flowchart of a procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method provided by an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1 As shown, an embodiment of the present invention provides a procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method, the method comprising:

[0022] Step S10: determining evaluation system construction rules based on user needs, and determining various evaluation indicators for procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation based on the evaluation system construction rules.

[0023] Specifically, the evaluation system construction rules include indicator library construction rules, indicator system construction rules and indicator information maintenance rules; wherein, the indicator library includes one or more of an industry table, an indicator first-level business classification table, an indicator second-level business classification table, an indicator domain table and an indicator regulatory dimension table; wherein, the industry table is used to indicate the industry to which the current procurement supply chain belongs based on user needs; the indicator first-level business classification table and the indicator second-level business classification table are used to determine the various evaluation objects of the current procurement supply chain based on user needs; the indicator domain table is used to determine the standard indicator type applied to the current procurement supply chain evaluation based on user needs, and the standard indicator type is any one or more of general indicators, industry indicators and enterprise indicators; the regulatory dimension table is used to determine the current procurement supply chain evaluation objectives based on needs, and the evaluation objectives are any one or more of efficiency, effectiveness, compliance, resilience, flexibility, social responsibility and degree of digitization.

[0024] In the embodiment of the present invention, the indicator library construction rules ensure that the evaluation system has sufficient flexibility and scalability. The contents of the indicator library mainly include industry table, indicator first-level business classification table, indicator second-level business classification table, indicator domain table and indicator supervision dimension table. Through these tables, the evaluation system can flexibly adapt to different industry needs and business scenarios.

[0025] In a possible implementation, the industry table includes: A agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fishery, B mining, C manufacturing, D electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply, E construction, F transportation, warehousing and postal services, G information transmission, software and information technology services, H wholesale and retail, I accommodation and catering, J finance, K real estate, L leasing and business services, M scientific research and technical services, N water conservancy, environment and public facilities management, O resident services, repair and other services, P education, Q health and social work, R culture, sports and entertainment, S public administration, social security and social organizations, T international organizations. The table indicates the industry to which the current procurement supply chain belongs based on user needs. The industry table contains a wide range of classifications, from agriculture, manufacturing, construction to finance and information technology services, each industry has its own unique supply chain characteristics and evaluation needs. This allows the evaluation system to be tailored to the characteristics of different industries to ensure the accuracy and applicability of the evaluation results.

[0026] Furthermore, the first-level business classification table of indicators includes: GYSGL supplier management and evaluation, CGGL procurement management and operation, YSCB budget and cost, and SZHNL digital capabilities and levels.

[0027] Furthermore, the secondary business classification table of indicators includes: GYSZR supplier access, GYSLY supplier performance, GYSJX supplier performance management, XQYJH demand and planning, CGXY procurement sourcing, HTGL contract management, LYJF performance and delivery, KCGL inventory management, HSGL recycling management, GCJG process supervision, YSGL budget control, CBGL cost management, SJGLNL data management capabilities, YYSP application level, SZHSP digital level, AQBZ security assurance, and YYYWH operation and maintenance.

[0028] In an embodiment of the present invention, these two types of tables are used to determine the evaluation objects of the current procurement supply chain based on user needs. The first-level business classification table covers core business areas such as supplier management and evaluation, procurement management and operation, budget and cost management, digital capabilities and levels, while the second-level business classification table further refines the specific evaluation objects in these areas, such as supplier access, contract management, inventory management, etc. This hierarchical classification structure helps enterprises to clarify the evaluation objects in a complex supply chain environment and ensure the comprehensiveness and pertinence of the evaluation.

[0029] Furthermore, the indicator domain table contains: 10 general indicators, 20 industry indicators, and 30 enterprise indicators. This table is used to determine the standard indicator types used in the current procurement supply chain evaluation based on user needs. The evaluation indicators are divided into three categories: general indicators, industry indicators, and enterprise indicators. This classification allows enterprises to choose the most suitable evaluation indicator type according to their specific needs. General indicators are suitable for most enterprises, industry indicators are targeted at the characteristics of specific industries, and enterprise indicators reflect the unique needs and strategic goals of the enterprise itself.

[0030] Furthermore, the indicator supervision dimension table includes: 01 efficiency, 02 effectiveness, 03 compliance, 04 resilience, 05 flexibility, 06 social responsibility, and 07 digitalization. The supervision dimension table is used to determine the evaluation objectives of the current procurement supply chain based on demand. These evaluation objectives include efficiency, effectiveness, compliance, resilience, flexibility, social responsibility, and degree of digitalization. These dimensions cover the key areas of modern enterprises in supply chain management. For example, the efficiency dimension focuses on the operating speed and resource utilization of the supply chain, the compliance dimension focuses on whether relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards are followed, and the social responsibility dimension involves the company's performance in environmental protection and social impact. By clarifying these dimensions, companies can more comprehensively evaluate the energy efficiency of the supply chain.

[0031] Based on the solution of the present invention, through the implementation of these rules, enterprises can build a standardized and benchmarkable supply chain energy efficiency evaluation system. This system can not only help enterprises accurately evaluate the energy efficiency level of their procurement supply chain, but also identify their own shortcomings and improve them by benchmarking with advanced companies in the industry. The establishment of this system provides strong support for enterprises to maintain their advantages in the fierce market competition. At the same time, through the detailed indicator classification and dimension setting, the evaluation system has a high degree of flexibility and adaptability, and can meet the diverse needs of different enterprises and different scenarios.

[0032] Furthermore, the indicator system includes one or more of system code, system description, total weight, total score, status, effective start date, effective end date, version information, system application scope and benchmarking settings. Specifically:

[0033] 1) System code: used to uniquely identify each assessment system to ensure accurate identification and call in various assessment scenarios.

[0034] 2) System Description: Provide a detailed description of the assessment system so that users can clearly understand the assessment scope and purpose of the system.

[0035] 3) Total weight and total score: used to set the weight distribution and scoring criteria of the entire evaluation system to ensure the fairness and comparability of the evaluation results.

[0036] 4) Status: Indicates the current usage of the assessment system, such as whether it is activated, to facilitate management and updating.

[0037] 5) Effective start date and end date: Define the validity period of the evaluation system to ensure that the evaluation criteria meet current business needs and industry standards.

[0038] 6) Version information: record the historical versions and update information of the assessment system to ensure that it can be traced and compared when the assessment standards change.

[0039] 7) Scope of application: Clarify the business scenarios or industries to which the evaluation system is applicable to make the system more targeted.

[0040] 8) Benchmarking: Allows the evaluation system to be benchmarked against advanced standards in the industry to help companies find ways to improve.

[0041] Furthermore, the indicator information includes one or more of indicator code, indicator description, indicator definition, indicator explanation, primary business classification code, secondary business classification code, indicator domain code, regulatory dimension code, reference weight, reference score, measurement unit, effective status, assessment period category, indicator level, superior indicator code, reference logic and indicator dimension. Specifically:

[0042] 1) Indicator coding: Assign a unique identifier to each indicator to ensure accurate reference and tracking within the system.

[0043] 2) Indicator description and definition: Provide clear indicator explanations to help users understand the meaning and application scenarios of the indicators.

[0044] 3) Indicator description: Further refine the application rules and conditions of the indicators to make the evaluation process more transparent and easy to operate.

[0045] 4) Primary and secondary business classification codes: Business classification codes are used to ensure that indicators accurately correspond to specific business areas, thereby improving the pertinence and effectiveness of the assessment.

[0046] 5) Indicator domain coding: Identify the field to which the indicator belongs (such as general indicators, industry indicators, enterprise indicators), so that the evaluation system can adapt to the needs of different industries and enterprises.

[0047] 6) Regulatory dimension coding: Define the specific dimensions that the assessment focuses on (such as efficiency, effectiveness, compliance, etc.) to ensure that the assessment covers the core concerns of corporate management.

[0048] 7) Reference weight and reference score: Set the weight and score of each indicator in the entire evaluation system to ensure that the evaluation results can accurately reflect the actual performance of the enterprise.

[0049] 8) Unit of measurement: Unify the data representation of indicators to ensure consistent comparison during the evaluation process.

[0050] 9) Effective status and assessment period category: Define the validity period and assessment cycle of the indicator so that the assessment work can proceed as planned.

[0051] 10) Indicator level and superior indicator coding: Ensure the structure and hierarchy of the evaluation system by setting the hierarchical relationship and logical association of indicators.

[0052] 11) Reference logic and indicator dimensions: Provide calculation and interpretation rules for evaluation indicators to make the evaluation results more scientific and reasonable.

[0053] Based on the solution of the present invention, the detailed definition and organization of these indicator information ensures the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the evaluation system. Through the careful setting of indicator coding, classification, weight, dimension, etc., the evaluation system can achieve accurate data analysis and evaluation. Ultimately, enterprises can obtain reliable evaluation results through this system, thereby supporting the decision-making and optimization of supply chain management and improving the overall operational efficiency and competitiveness of enterprises.

[0054] Step S20: Execute parameter definition and evaluation standard definition for each evaluation indicator to obtain an evaluation model.

[0055] Specifically, a parameter file for each evaluation indicator is defined, wherein the parameter file is used to define and manage the properties and rules of each evaluation indicator; in the defined evaluation parameter file, the evaluation rules of the indicator are determined, wherein the evaluation rules are any one or more of calculation rules, evaluation conditions, evaluation results and evaluation suggestions; based on the defined evaluation parameter file, an evaluation standard is established for each evaluation indicator; and the defined evaluation standard is applied to each evaluation indicator to form an evaluation model.

[0056] Furthermore, the method of establishing evaluation criteria for each evaluation indicator based on the defined evaluation parameter file includes: selecting an evaluation parameter file related to the current evaluation needs; determining the overall structure of the evaluation criteria based on the selected parameter file, including one or more of the classification, scope of application, total score, status and effective date of the evaluation criteria; setting specific evaluation criteria in the evaluation criteria for each evaluation indicator, including any one or more of the benchmark value, upper and lower limits and calculation rules.

[0057] In the embodiment of the present invention, the role of the parameter file is to provide detailed attribute definitions and management rules for each evaluation indicator. These attributes and rules cover the basic information of the indicator, such as the description of the indicator, the unit of measurement, the scope of application, etc., as well as more complex logical rules, such as evaluation conditions, calculation methods and weight settings. By defining these parameter files, it is ensured that the evaluation system can flexibly and accurately apply appropriate evaluation rules when facing different business scenarios.

[0058] Furthermore, in the defined parameter file, the evaluation rules of each indicator are further clarified. The evaluation rules are the core part of the entire evaluation system, which determines how to evaluate each indicator based on actual data. These rules include calculation rules, evaluation conditions, evaluation results and evaluation suggestions. For example, the calculation rules may involve how to perform weighted average on different data, while the evaluation conditions stipulate under what circumstances the result of the indicator is qualified or unqualified. Through these rules, the evaluation process becomes based on evidence, ensuring the scientificity and consistency of the evaluation results.

[0059] Furthermore, based on the defined evaluation parameter files, evaluation criteria are established for each evaluation indicator. Evaluation criteria are the embodiment of specific requirements and expected values ​​for each evaluation indicator. This process includes several steps: First, it is necessary to select evaluation parameter files related to the current evaluation needs. This step ensures that the construction of evaluation criteria is targeted and can meet the needs of specific businesses or projects. Then, based on these selected parameter files, the overall structure of the evaluation criteria is determined, including the classification, scope of application, total score, status and effective date of the evaluation criteria. These settings determine the status and role of the evaluation criteria in the entire evaluation system. For each evaluation indicator, the evaluation criteria also need to set specific benchmark values, upper and lower limits, and calculation rules. For example, for a supply chain efficiency indicator, the benchmark value may be the ideal supply time, the upper and lower limits specify the range within which the performance of the supply chain is acceptable, and the calculation rules determine how to calculate the score based on the actual supply time. Through these refined standard settings, the evaluation model is formed, making the evaluation process more detailed and comprehensive.

[0060] Step S30: Collect the current procurement supply chain parameter information, and use the parameter information as the input parameter of the evaluation model to output the corresponding evaluation result.

[0061] Specifically, the current procurement supply chain parameter information is classified to obtain the parameter value corresponding to each evaluation indicator in the evaluation model; the corresponding evaluation value calculation of each evaluation indicator is performed based on the evaluation standard of each evaluation indicator to obtain the evaluation value of each evaluation indicator; based on the indicator level of the evaluation model, a step-by-step weighted calculation is performed to obtain the evaluation value of the top-level indicator; based on the evaluation value of each top-level indicator and the evaluation value of each evaluation indicator, the corresponding evaluation result is output.

[0062] In an embodiment of the present invention, the system classifies the collected procurement supply chain parameter information. This step is crucial because there are many types of data in the procurement supply chain, covering multiple aspects from supplier management, procurement execution to inventory control. Through classification, these parameter information can be effectively matched with various evaluation indicators in the evaluation model. For example, indicators such as the supplier's delivery timeliness, the control level of procurement costs, and inventory turnover rate correspond to different parameter values. This classification process not only improves the efficiency of data processing, but also ensures the accurate matching of data and evaluation indicators. Next, based on the evaluation criteria of each evaluation indicator, the system performs the corresponding evaluation value calculation. Each evaluation indicator has specific evaluation criteria and calculation rules. For example, the performance evaluation of a supplier may be based on the timeliness and compliance of its delivery. According to these standards, the system calculates the classified parameter information and generates specific evaluation values ​​for each evaluation indicator. These evaluation values ​​are a quantitative reflection of the performance of each link in the supply chain, reflecting the gap between actual operations and expected standards.

[0063] Furthermore, after obtaining the evaluation value of each evaluation indicator, the system further performs a step-by-step weighted calculation to determine the evaluation value of the top-level indicator. The procurement supply chain evaluation system is multi-level, and each top-level indicator may contain multiple sub-indicators. For example, the overall efficiency of the supply chain may include sub-indicators such as procurement costs, supplier performance, and inventory management. Through weighted calculation, the system can integrate the evaluation values ​​of each sub-indicator to obtain a more comprehensive top-level indicator evaluation value. This step-by-step weighted method ensures that the influence of each sub-indicator on the final result is reasonably distributed. Finally, based on the evaluation values ​​of the top-level indicator and each evaluation indicator, the system outputs the corresponding evaluation results. This result is an overall evaluation of the current procurement supply chain efficiency, which can provide strong decision-making support for the enterprise management. The evaluation results can not only reveal the strengths and weaknesses in the supply chain operation, but also help enterprises discover potential risks and improvement opportunities, thereby optimizing the supply chain management strategy.

[0064] Step S40: extracting an assessment report template based on the assessment result to generate a corresponding assessment report, and pushing corresponding warning information based on the assessment report.

[0065] Specifically, an evaluation report template is extracted based on the evaluation results, each preset key indicator is determined, and each evaluation result is displayed differently based on the visualization rules of each preset key indicator; it is determined whether there are abnormal indicators in the evaluation report, and if so, the corresponding early warning rules are triggered based on the abnormal level corresponding to the abnormal indicator; wherein the early warning rules include: notification form, notification level, calculation rule-condition, notification object and notification content; the notification form is any one or more of platform notification, email notification and SMS notification; the notification level is any one or more of notification, warning, error, failure and major event.

[0066] In an embodiment of the present invention, the system first extracts an evaluation report template based on the evaluation results, and generates a corresponding evaluation report on this basis. In the process of generating the evaluation report, the system will automatically determine the preset key indicators, which are the core of the company's attention, such as procurement efficiency, contract execution, inventory management level, etc. In order to enable management to understand these evaluation results more intuitively, the system will also perform differentiated display of the evaluation results based on the visualization rules of each preset key indicator. The key indicators are displayed graphically in the management cockpit, which is subdivided into three main modules: procurement analysis / efficiency, contract / supplier analysis, and inventory analysis.

[0067] Furthermore, in the procurement analysis / efficiency module, the system displays indicators such as the accuracy of procurement plans, the frequency of emergency procurement, and the situation where bidding quotas are not bid. The contract / supplier analysis module focuses on indicators such as the timeliness of contract signing, contract execution, and the risk status of key suppliers. The inventory analysis module focuses on core data such as inventory count differences, inventory age analysis, and inventory turnover. Through these modular graphical displays, management can quickly identify possible problems or potential areas for improvement in the supply chain.

[0068] Furthermore, after generating the evaluation report, the system will further determine whether there are abnormal indicators in the report. These abnormal indicators refer to those indicators whose evaluation results are significantly deviated from the expected or standard values, which may indicate that there is a risk in a certain link in the supply chain. If the system detects an abnormal indicator, it will trigger the corresponding warning rules according to the abnormal level.

[0069] Furthermore, the setting of early warning rules includes multiple aspects: first, the form of notification. Enterprises can choose to push early warning information to relevant persons in charge through platform notification, email notification or SMS notification; second, the notification level. Early warnings can be divided into multiple levels such as notification, warning, error, failure and major event, and are classified and processed according to the severity of the abnormality. In addition, the early warning rules also cover the calculation rules-conditions, notification objects and notification content to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of early warning information.

[0070] Furthermore, the evaluation results include detailed information such as evaluation result code, evaluation standard code, system code, evaluation result description, total score, evaluation period category, evaluation period, status, indicator code, unified social credit code, indicator value, score, measurement unit, evaluation results and evaluation suggestions. The system will not only record this information in detail, but also allow necessary adjustments to the evaluation results. If the evaluation results are adjusted, the approval process will be triggered to ensure the validity and consistency of the results. The evaluation report includes evaluation indicators, indicator values, scores, evaluation results and evaluation suggestions to help companies fully understand the performance of the current supply chain. Through these reports, corporate management can fully grasp the actual situation of various key indicators and make more scientific management decisions.

[0071] Furthermore, the system also supports the viewing of detailed reports, which provide more detailed data information, such as procurement plan accuracy, emergency procurement frequency, bidding limit without bidding, multiple bidding procurement plan, one-time success rate, procurement result approval abnormality, intensive procurement rate, open procurement rate, procurement time, average procurement method time, contract signing timeliness rate, framework contract completion rate, contract arrival timeliness rate, contract delivery overtime, contract completion rate, key suppliers, supplier risk situation, waste material utilization rate, idle material utilization rate, inventory count differences, inventory age analysis, inventory turnover rate, inventory change trend, key materials, etc. These detailed reports provide the basis for in-depth analysis for management and support more detailed decision-making.

[0072] In one possible implementation, the system uses a predefined evaluation parameter file to perform parameter definition and evaluation standard definition for each evaluation indicator in the fields of procurement, contract and inventory management to form a complete evaluation model. The model covers key indicators such as supplier performance, procurement costs, and inventory turnover. As daily operations proceed, the system collects parameter information of the current procurement supply chain in real time and uses this information as input to the evaluation model. Based on the calculation rules of the model, the system quantitatively evaluates the performance of each evaluation indicator and calculates the evaluation value of the top-level indicator by weighting it step by step. The system further integrates the results of each top-level indicator to generate an overall supply chain performance evaluation result.

[0073] After generating the evaluation results, the system automatically extracts the preset evaluation report template and generates an evaluation report containing assessment indicators, indicator values, scores, evaluation results and evaluation recommendations. Key indicators are displayed graphically in the management cockpit, which is divided into three modules: procurement analysis / efficiency, contract / supplier analysis, and inventory analysis. Management can quickly understand the overall performance of the supply chain through the cockpit. At the same time, the system will also detect whether there are abnormal indicators based on the evaluation results. If an abnormality is found, such as the supplier's fulfillment rate is lower than the set benchmark value, the system will trigger the corresponding early warning rules based on the abnormality level. The early warning information is promptly conveyed to the relevant responsible personnel through platform notifications, emails or text messages. The warning levels range from general notifications to major events to ensure that problems of different severity can be properly handled.

[0074] When an abnormal warning is triggered, management can view detailed reports through the system to obtain more detailed data support, analyze the root cause of the problem and take corrective measures. The evaluation results in the report can also be adjusted according to the actual situation. After the adjustment, the system automatically triggers the approval process to ensure the accuracy of the final result.

[0075] Figure 2 : is a system structure diagram of a procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation system provided by an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2As shown, an embodiment of the present invention provides a procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation system, and the system includes: a system construction unit, which is used to determine the evaluation system construction rules based on user needs, and determine each evaluation index for procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation based on the evaluation system construction rules; a model construction unit, which is used to perform parameter definition and evaluation standard definition on each evaluation index to obtain an evaluation model; an evaluation unit, which is used to collect current procurement supply chain parameter information, and use the parameter information as an input parameter of the evaluation model to output a corresponding evaluation result; a push unit, which is used to extract an evaluation report template based on the evaluation result to generate a corresponding evaluation report, and push corresponding warning information based on the evaluation report.

[0076] The embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which instructions are stored, which, when executed on a computer, enable the computer to execute the above-mentioned procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method.

[0077] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps in the method for implementing the above-mentioned embodiments can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a program, and the program is stored in a storage medium, including several instructions for making a single-chip microcomputer, a chip or a processor (processor) perform all or part of the steps of the method described in each embodiment of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), disk or optical disk and other media that can store program codes.

[0078] The optional embodiments of the present invention are described in detail above in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. However, the embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the specific details in the above embodiments. Within the technical concept of the embodiments of the present invention, the technical scheme of the embodiments of the present invention can be subjected to a variety of simple modifications, and these simple modifications all belong to the protection scope of the embodiments of the present invention. It should also be noted that the various specific technical features described in the above specific embodiments can be combined in any suitable manner without contradiction. In order to avoid unnecessary repetition, the embodiments of the present invention will not further describe various possible combinations.

[0079] In addition, various embodiments of the present invention may be arbitrarily combined, and as long as they do not violate the concept of the embodiments of the present invention, they should also be regarded as the contents disclosed in the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method, characterized in that: The method comprises: Determine evaluation system construction rules based on user needs, and determine various evaluation indicators for procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation based on the evaluation system construction rules; Execute parameter definition and evaluation standard definition for each evaluation indicator to obtain an evaluation model; Collect current procurement supply chain parameter information, use the parameter information as input to the evaluation model, and output corresponding evaluation results; An assessment report template is extracted based on the assessment result to generate a corresponding assessment report, and corresponding warning information is pushed based on the assessment report.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The evaluation system construction rules include indicator library construction rules, indicator system construction rules and indicator information maintenance rules; The indicator database includes one or more of the following: industry table, indicator primary business classification table, indicator secondary business classification table, indicator domain table, and indicator supervision dimension table; among which, The industry table is used to indicate the industry to which the current procurement supply chain belongs based on user needs; The first-level business classification table and the second-level business classification table are used to determine the evaluation objects of the current procurement supply chain based on user needs; The indicator domain table is used to determine the standard indicator type applied to the current procurement supply chain evaluation based on user needs, and the standard indicator type is any one or more of general indicators, industry indicators and enterprise indicators; The regulatory dimension table is used to determine the current procurement supply chain evaluation objectives based on demand, and the evaluation objectives are any one or more of efficiency, effectiveness, compliance, resilience, flexibility, social responsibility and degree of digitization.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The indicator system includes one or more of system code, system description, total weight, total score, status, effective start date, effective end date, version information, system application scope and benchmarking settings.

4. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The indicator information includes one or more of the indicator code, indicator description, indicator definition, indicator explanation, first-level business classification code, second-level business classification code, indicator domain code, regulatory dimension code, reference weight, reference score, measurement unit, effective status, assessment period category, indicator level, superior indicator code, reference logic and indicator dimension.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The step of performing parameter definition and evaluation standard definition on each evaluation indicator to obtain an evaluation model includes: A parameter file defining each evaluation indicator, wherein the parameter file is used to define and manage the attributes and rules of each evaluation indicator; In the defined evaluation parameter file, determining the evaluation rules of the indicators, wherein the evaluation rules are any one or more of calculation rules, evaluation conditions, evaluation results and evaluation suggestions; Establish evaluation criteria for each evaluation indicator based on the defined evaluation parameter file; Apply the defined evaluation criteria to each evaluation indicator to form an evaluation model.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that The evaluation criteria are established for each evaluation indicator based on the defined evaluation parameter file, including: Select the assessment parameter file related to the current assessment needs; Based on the selected parameter file, determine the overall structure of the evaluation criteria, including one or more of the classification, scope of application, total score, status and effective date of the evaluation criteria; Specific evaluation criteria are set in the evaluation criteria for each evaluation indicator, including any one or more of a benchmark value, upper and lower limits, and calculation rules.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Collect the current procurement supply chain parameter information, and use the parameter information as the input parameter of the evaluation model to output the corresponding evaluation results, including: Classify the current procurement supply chain parameter information and obtain the parameter values ​​corresponding to each evaluation indicator in the evaluation model; Calculate the evaluation value of each evaluation indicator based on the evaluation standard of each evaluation indicator to obtain the evaluation value of each evaluation indicator; Perform a step-by-step weighted calculation based on the indicator level of the evaluation model to obtain the evaluation value of the top-level indicator; The corresponding evaluation results are output based on the evaluation values ​​of each top-level indicator and the evaluation values ​​of each evaluation indicator.

8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Extracting an assessment report template based on the assessment result to generate a corresponding assessment report, and triggering a corresponding warning rule based on the assessment report, includes: Extracting an evaluation report template based on the evaluation results, determining each preset key indicator, and performing differentiated display on each evaluation result based on the visualization rules of each preset key indicator; Determine whether there are abnormal indicators in the evaluation report. If so, trigger the corresponding warning rules based on the abnormal level corresponding to the abnormal indicators; The warning rules include: Notification form, notification level, calculation rules-conditions, notification recipients and notification content; The notification form is any one or more of platform notification, email notification and SMS notification; The notification level is any one or more of notification, warning, error, failure, and major event.

9. A procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation system, characterized in that: The system comprises: A system construction unit, used to determine evaluation system construction rules based on user needs, and determine various evaluation indicators for procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation based on the evaluation system construction rules; A model building unit, used to perform parameter definition and evaluation standard definition on each evaluation indicator to obtain an evaluation model; An evaluation unit, used to collect current procurement supply chain parameter information, use the parameter information as input to the evaluation model, and output corresponding evaluation results; The push unit is used to extract an assessment report template based on the assessment result to generate a corresponding assessment report, and push corresponding warning information based on the assessment report.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores instructions, which, when executed on a computer, enable the computer to execute the procurement supply chain energy efficiency evaluation method described in any one of claims 1 to 8.

Images