Standardized evaluation system for single health degree of communication engineering

Abstract

The invention discloses a communication engineering single health degree standardization evaluation system, which comprises a data acquisition system, the data acquisition system is connected with a monitoring system and an evaluation system, and the evaluation system comprises a health degree evaluation model unit. A unified single health degree standardization assessment system is established, and links such as project design, project implementation, project acceptance and project submission in the whole life cycle of project construction are assessed by taking a single project as an assessment object in a mode of combining subjective scoring and objective value taking. The engineering health level is accurately and quickly evaluated, the network resource utilization rate is improved, the communication service quality is ensured, related personnel are promoted to better understand the construction target and the construction range of the engineering construction management platform, and subsequent construction work is guided to be carried out.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of communication engineering, and in particular to a communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system. Background Art

[0002] In order to strengthen the construction management of individual communication projects, ensure that the project construction is legal and compliant, and realize the high-efficiency and low-cost construction of high-quality networks, based on the full life cycle project management process, with individual projects as the evaluation objects, project health assessments are carried out on the project design, project implementation, project acceptance, and project submission for review in the entire life cycle of the project construction.

[0003] According to data, in existing technical solutions, the evaluation system relies on a series of technologies, such as data analysis, algorithm models, sensor networks and cloud computing, which can conduct a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the operating status, performance, security, reliability and other aspects of a single communication project. However, the system also has data quality problems and lacks certain data comparison and verification, resulting in relatively general data quality. Therefore, staff are required to improve data quality to meet the actual needs of single projects.

[0004] Chinese patent document CN102081622B discloses a "method for evaluating system health and a system health evaluation device". It includes: classifying database data and establishing classification quantification technical indicators; assigning different data quantification weights to each database data technical indicator in the classification quantification technical indicators; obtaining and storing the classification quantification technical indicator thresholds when the database is running stably according to the database data technical indicators and the data quantification weights; collecting database data, calculating the classification quantification technical indicators according to the collected database data, and comparing them with the pre-stored classification quantification technical indicator thresholds to evaluate the system health. The above technical solution has limited efficiency in evaluating the system health and is difficult to meet the monitoring quality requirements. Summary of the invention

[0005] The present invention mainly solves the technical problem that the efficiency of the health of the original technical solution evaluation system is limited and it is difficult to meet the monitoring quality requirements. It provides a standardized evaluation system for the health of a single communication project, establishes a unified standardized evaluation system for the health of a single project, and combines subjective scoring with objective value taking. The single project is taken as the evaluation object, and the project design, project implementation, project acceptance, project submission and other links in the entire life cycle of the project construction are evaluated. The project health level is evaluated accurately and quickly, the utilization rate of network resources is improved, the quality of communication services is ensured, and relevant personnel are promoted to better understand the construction objectives and scope of the project construction management platform, and guide the subsequent construction work.

[0006] The above technical problems of the present invention are mainly solved by the following technical solutions: the present invention includes a data acquisition system, which is respectively connected to a monitoring system and an evaluation system, and the evaluation system includes a health evaluation model unit, which automatically calculates and evaluates the health of the project based on the collected data based on preset rules and algorithms. A unified single-item health standardization evaluation system is established, and by combining subjective scoring with objective values, a single project is used as the evaluation object to evaluate the project design, project implementation, project acceptance, project submission and other links in the entire life cycle of the project construction, accurately and quickly evaluate the health level of the project, improve the utilization rate of network resources, ensure the quality of communication services, promote relevant personnel to better understand the construction goals and scope of the project construction management platform, and guide the subsequent construction work.

[0007] Preferably, the data acquisition system includes a standardized evaluation indicator unit and a data acquisition and monitoring unit. The standardized evaluation indicator unit takes a single project as the evaluation object and evaluates the entire life cycle of the project construction. The standardized evaluation indicator unit takes a single project as the evaluation object and evaluates the engineering design, engineering implementation, engineering acceptance, and engineering submission for review in the entire life cycle of the project construction. The evaluation factors include engineering construction quality, progress, cost, compliance, and safety, and the evaluation indicators cover all aspects of the single project.

[0008] Preferably, the entire life cycle of the engineering construction includes the engineering design phase and the engineering implementation phase, as well as the engineering acceptance phase and the engineering submission phase.

[0009] Preferably, the evaluation factors include the quality, progress and cost of the project construction, and also include whether the project construction is compliant and safe.

[0010] Preferably, the data acquisition and monitoring unit collects and analyzes various operation data of individual projects in real time, collects individual data from each individual project, and cleans and pre-processes the data. The data acquisition and monitoring unit collects and analyzes various operation data of individual projects of communication projects in real time, collects individual data from each communication project, and the data processing layer cleans and pre-processes the data, mines and analyzes the technology through network equipment, system logs and user feedback, and checks the problems and bottlenecks in the operation of the project.

[0011] Preferably, the monitoring system includes an early warning and alarm mechanism unit, an optimization suggestion and decision support unit, and a safety and reliability unit. The early warning and alarm mechanism unit automatically triggers an early warning or alarm when the health of the project is lower than a certain threshold. This effectively avoids serious problems in the project and ensures the continuity and stability of communication services. The optimization suggestion and decision support unit gives targeted optimization suggestions and improvement measures based on the evaluation results and data analysis.

[0012] Preferably, the safety and reliability unit encrypts, backs up and fault-tolerant process data to ensure data integrity and availability. The safety and reliability unit uses appropriate encryption, backup and fault-tolerant technologies to ensure data integrity and availability and to operate stably in complex and harsh environments.

[0013] Preferably, the evaluation system comprises a health evaluation model unit, which automatically calculates and evaluates the health of the project based on the collected data in combination with the evaluation indicators, and performs health evaluation on individual items based on preset rules and algorithms.

[0014] Preferably, a visualization system is also included, which is connected to the monitoring system and the evaluation system respectively. The visualization and report generation unit displays the evaluation results, data analysis, optimization suggestions and other information in an intuitive and clear manner. At the same time, the system generates various reports and statistical charts to facilitate reporting, auditing and decision-making by all parties.

[0015] Preferably, the visualization system comprises a visualization and report generation unit, which generates reports and statistical charts to display evaluation results, data analysis and optimization suggestions.

[0016] The beneficial effects of the present invention are: 1. Establish a unified standardized assessment system for single-item health. By combining subjective scoring with objective values, taking single projects as the assessment object, evaluate the project design, project implementation, project acceptance, project submission and other links in the entire life cycle of the project construction, accurately and quickly assess the project health level, improve network resource utilization, ensure the quality of communication services, promote relevant personnel to better understand the construction objectives and scope of the project construction management platform, and guide subsequent construction work.

[0017] 2. Based on preset rules and algorithms, the standardization and consistency of the evaluation process are ensured. All individual projects follow the same evaluation standards and processes, making the evaluation results more objective, fair and reliable. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0018] Figure 1 It is a system principle connection structure diagram of the present invention.

[0019] In the figure, 1 is the standardized evaluation indicator unit, 2 is the data collection and monitoring unit, 3 is the early warning and alarm mechanism unit, 4 is the optimization suggestion and decision support unit, 5 is the safety and reliability unit, 6 is the health assessment model unit, and 7 is the visualization and report generation unit. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0020] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the present invention more clearly understood, the technical solution of the present invention is further described in detail below through embodiments and in combination with the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the specific implementation method described here is only an optimal embodiment of the present invention, which is only used to explain the present invention and does not limit the scope of protection of the present invention. All other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0021] In mobile communication system networks, such as Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) networks, Passive Optical Networks (PON), Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS), and other IT equipment system networks, such as host, storage, network, middleware and other networks, the network equipment in each system is configured with network equipment parameters including network operation parameters and network equipment performance parameters. The network equipment parameters involve business indicators, technical indicators and management indicators of network equipment to ensure the security and stable operation of the mobile communication system network. The configuration of network equipment parameters will have a great impact on the reliability, health, effectiveness and commerciality of the system network. These network equipment parameters are managed and maintained in the form of databases. Therefore, database maintenance and management technology is a key technology in modern network management systems, operation and maintenance systems and other information systems. The quality of database operation will directly affect the operation quality of the entire information system. In other words, the health of the database directly affects the health of the system. By evaluating the database operation, i.e., the system health, while ensuring the normal operation of the system network, the optimal state of the system network operation can be sought and the system network performance can be optimized.

[0022] At present, there is no unified standard for evaluating the operation of the database. It is mainly based on the maintenance managers' manual monitoring of the database and the judgment based on their personal experience. In other words, the maintenance managers obtain some technical indicators of the operation of the network equipment and determine whether the technical indicators are reasonable based on their personal work experience to confirm the health of the system: if the technical indicators are good and there are no network failures, the health is considered high; otherwise, the health is low.

[0023] The existing method of evaluating the health of the system by monitoring the database is that it is difficult to obtain the various data required for database management manually, the obtained database data is incomplete, it is difficult to reflect the actual health of the database, and the monitoring quality is low; at the same time, it is difficult for maintenance managers to process the massive data of many indicators, the data processing efficiency is low, and it cannot adapt to the changes in the operating environment of the system network equipment, and the efficiency of evaluating the health of the system is low; further, the technical indicators of the database data obtained are analyzed and judged based on the personal experience of the maintenance managers, lack of scientific decision-making, different maintenance managers may come to completely opposite conclusions on the health of the same system network equipment, which is not conducive to the maintenance and management of the system network equipment database.

[0024] Before discussing the exemplary embodiments in more detail, it should be mentioned that some exemplary embodiments are described as processes or methods depicted as flow charts. Although the flow charts describe the operations (or steps) as sequential processes, many of the operations (or steps) therein can be implemented in parallel, concurrently, or simultaneously. In addition, the order of the operations can be rearranged. The process can be terminated when its operation is completed, but can also have additional steps not included in the drawings; the process can correspond to a method, function, procedure, subroutine, subprogram, etc.

[0025] The technical solution of the present invention is further specifically described below through embodiments and in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

[0026] Embodiment: A communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system of this embodiment, such as Figure 1 As shown, it includes a data acquisition system, which is connected to the monitoring system and the evaluation system respectively, and the evaluation system includes a health evaluation model unit 6, which automatically calculates and evaluates the health of the project based on the collected data based on the preset rules and algorithms. A unified single-item health standardization evaluation system is established. By combining subjective scoring with objective values, a single project is used as the evaluation object to evaluate the engineering design, engineering implementation, engineering acceptance, engineering submission and other links in the entire life cycle of the engineering construction, accurately and quickly evaluate the health level of the project, improve the utilization rate of network resources, ensure the quality of communication services, promote relevant personnel to better understand the construction goals and scope of the engineering construction management platform, and guide the subsequent construction work.

[0027] The data acquisition system includes a standardized evaluation index unit 1 and a data acquisition and monitoring unit 2. The standardized evaluation index unit 1 takes a single project as the evaluation object and evaluates the entire life cycle of the project construction. The standardized evaluation index unit 1 takes a single project as the evaluation object and evaluates the engineering design, engineering implementation, engineering acceptance, and engineering submission for review in the entire life cycle of the project construction. The evaluation factors include the quality, progress, cost, compliance, and safety of the project construction. The evaluation indicators cover all aspects of the single project. The entire life cycle of the project construction includes the engineering design link and the engineering implementation link, as well as the engineering acceptance link and the engineering submission for review link. The evaluation factors include the quality, progress and cost of the project construction, as well as whether the project construction is compliant and safe.

[0028] The data acquisition and monitoring unit 2 collects and analyzes various operation data of individual projects in real time, collects individual data from each individual project, and cleans and pre-processes the data. The data acquisition and monitoring unit collects and analyzes various operation data of individual projects of communication projects in real time, collects individual data from each communication project, and the data processing layer cleans and pre-processes the data, and mines and analyzes the technology through network equipment, system logs and user feedback to check the problems and bottlenecks in the operation of the project.

[0029] The monitoring system includes an early warning and alarm mechanism unit 3, an optimization suggestion and decision support unit 4, and a safety and reliability unit 5. The early warning and alarm mechanism unit 3 automatically triggers an early warning or alarm when the health of the project is lower than a certain threshold. It effectively avoids serious problems in the project and ensures the continuity and stability of communication services. The optimization suggestion and decision support unit gives targeted optimization suggestions and improvement measures based on the evaluation results and data analysis. The safety and reliability unit 5 encrypts, backs up and fault-tolerant process data to ensure the integrity and availability of the data. The safety and reliability unit 5 uses appropriate encryption, backup and fault-tolerant technologies to ensure the integrity and availability of the data and to operate stably in complex and harsh environments.

[0030] The evaluation system includes a health evaluation model unit 6, which automatically calculates and evaluates the health of the project based on the collected data and the evaluation indicators, and performs health evaluation on individual items based on preset rules and algorithms.

[0031] The visualization system is connected to the monitoring system and the evaluation system respectively. The visualization system includes a visualization and report generation unit 7, which generates reports and statistical charts to display the evaluation results, data analysis and optimization suggestions. The visualization and report generation unit 7 displays the evaluation results, data analysis, optimization suggestions and other information in an intuitive and clear manner. At the same time, the system generates various reports and statistical charts to facilitate reporting, auditing and decision-making by all parties.

[0032] Embodiment 1: See also Figure 1 As shown, a communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system includes: Data acquisition system, monitoring system, evaluation system, visualization system; The data collection system includes a standardized evaluation index unit 1 and a data collection and monitoring unit 2, the monitoring system includes an early warning and alarm mechanism unit 3, an optimization suggestion and decision support unit 4 and a safety and reliability unit 5, the evaluation system includes a health evaluation model unit 6, and the visualization system includes a visualization and report generation unit 7; Standardized evaluation indicator unit 1 takes a single project as the evaluation object and establishes a set of scientific and comprehensive evaluation indicators to evaluate the project design, project implementation, project acceptance, and project submission for review in the entire life cycle of the project construction. The evaluation elements include project construction quality, progress, cost, compliance, and safety. The evaluation indicators cover all aspects of a single project.

[0033] The scope of single project assessment: base stations, full services, indoor distribution / WLAN, pipelines, and transmission equipment in the single platform, excluding purchase and sporadic expansion projects; according to the project approval year, the investment projects that have been approved in the selected year and all the designed projects are displayed. Investment projects refer to all projects in the investment project management system that have been formally approved or pre-approved and included in the single project management.

[0034] According to the query conditions (project establishment year), the investment projects that have been established in the selected year and all the individual projects that have been launched are displayed; the remark is: "The score rate refers to the percentage converted from the ratio of the actual score divided by the total score of the assessable items"; the total row is displayed; all data statistics are up to the time selected in the query conditions (statistical deadline), and data occurring after the deadline is not included.

[0035] Summary 1 includes: scores of cities and counties, including the average scores of individual health items in cities or districts and counties, including the average scores and the average score rates. At the same time, the average scores are calculated separately according to the evaluation dimensions, evaluation stages, and responsible units.

[0036] The second summary includes: the scores of each evaluation item, and the scores of each city or district and county, and each detailed evaluation item.

[0037] Summary three includes: the scores of cooperative units, and the scores of each company and each detailed evaluation item according to different responsible entities.

[0038] Summary 1 specifically includes: The list states: City / District / County: When a provincial company employee logs in, the city will be displayed; when a branch company employee logs in, the district and county under the city will be displayed; when a district and county employee logs in, the district and county where the person is located will be displayed; Number of items: the number of items in the city or district within the screening criteria; Average score rate: the average score rate of each single evaluable item; Number of items with scores of 85 or above: the number of items with a health score of 85 or above; Percentage: (number of items with scores of 85 or above) / (number of items) × 100%; Number of items with scores below 60: the number of items with health score below 60; Percentage: (number of items below 60 points) / (number of items) × 100%; Average score: the average of the scores of each individual evaluable item; Evaluation dimensions: Average score of quality dimension (30 points): the average score of each item of "design quality", "construction quality", "supervision quality" and "acceptance quality"; Average score of progress dimension (30 points): the average score of each single item "construction progress", "acceptance progress", and "submission progress"; Average score of cost dimension (20 points): the average score of each single item "single expenditure budget ratio" and "surplus material return"; Average score of compliance dimension (15 points): the average score of each item "single design material collection quantity ratio", "single non-design material collection coding ratio" and "capital transfer ratio"; Average score of safety dimension (5 points): the average score of each individual "safety production fee"; Evaluation Phase: Average score of the design stage (35 points): the average of the scores of each item "design quality", "construction progress", "single expenditure budget ratio" and "safety production fee"; Average score of the construction stage (45 points): the average of the scores of each single item "construction quality", "supervision quality", "acceptance progress", "surplus material return", "single item design material quantity ratio", and "single item non-design material coding ratio"; Average score of the acceptance stage (20 points): the average score of each item "acceptance quality", "submission progress", and "transfer ratio"; responsible unit: Average score of construction units (50 points): the average of scores of each single item "acceptance quality", "acceptance progress", "single expenditure budget ratio", "transfer ratio", "safety production fee", "single design material collection quantity ratio", "single non-design material collection coding ratio"; Average score of design units (5 points): the average of scores of each single item "design quality"; Average score of the construction unit (35 points): the average score of each item "construction quality", "construction progress", "submission progress", and "surplus material return"; Average score of the supervision unit (10 points): the average of the scores of each individual "supervision quality" item.

[0039] The query states: Project establishment year: The default is the latest year in the current system. Select all years in the system from the drop-down list. Multiple selections are allowed. Statistical deadline: default is the current natural year, month and day; Major: All by default, drop down to select all majors, multiple selections are allowed; Single stage: Accepted by default, drop-down options: Designed but not completed, Completed but not accepted, Accepted, single choice; Single start time: time interval selection, year, month, and day.

[0040] Summary 2 specifically includes: List: Cities / districts / counties, number of individual items and average scores; Design stage: Average score of design quality (5 points), average score of construction progress (10 points), average score of single expenditure budget ratio (15 points), average score of safety production fee (5 points): the average score of each single item of "design quality", "construction progress", "single expenditure budget ratio", and "safety production fee" within the statistical scope; Construction stage: Average score of construction quality (10 points), average score of supervision quality (10 points), average score of acceptance progress (10 points), average score of surplus material return (5 points), average score of single design material collection rate (5 points), average score of single non-design material collection rate (5 points): the average score of each single item "construction quality", "supervision quality", "acceptance progress", "surplus material return", "single design material collection rate", "single non-design material collection rate" within the statistical scope; when the query condition (single stage) selects "designed but not completed", the column is not displayed; Acceptance stage: Average score of acceptance quality (5 points), average score of submission progress (10 points), average score of transfer ratio: the average score of each single "acceptance quality", "submission progress", and "transfer ratio" evaluation item within the statistical scope; when the query condition (single stage) selects "designed but not completed" or "completed but not accepted", the column will not be displayed; Query: Project establishment year: The default is the latest year in the current system. Select all years in the system from the drop-down list. Multiple selections are allowed. Statistical deadline: default is the current natural year, month and day; Major: All by default, drop down to select all majors, multiple selections are allowed; Single stage: Accepted by default, drop-down options: Designed but not completed, Completed but not accepted, Accepted, single choice; Single start time: time interval selection, year, month, and day.

[0041] Summary 3 specifically includes: List: Company Name: When "Construction Unit" is selected as the query condition (responsible unit), 11 cities are displayed. When other options are selected, the name of the cooperating unit is displayed; Average score of construction quality (10 points): the average score of individual items with construction quality scores within the statistical scope, where the construction unit is the current unit; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "construction unit"; Average score of construction progress (10 points): the average score of individual items with construction progress scores within the statistical scope, where the construction unit is the current unit; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "construction unit"; Average score of submission progress (10 points): the average score of individual items with submission progress scores within the statistical range, where the construction unit is the current unit; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "construction unit"; Average score of surplus material return (5 points): the average score of the single items with surplus material return scores within the statistical range, where the construction unit is the current unit; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "construction unit"; Average score of supervision quality (10 points): the average score of individual items with supervision quality scores within the statistical scope, where the supervision unit is the current unit; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "supervision unit"; Design quality average score (5 points): the average score of individual items with design quality scores within the statistical range, where the design unit is the current unit; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "design unit"; Acceptance quality average score (5 points): the average score of the individual items with acceptance quality scores in the current city / county within the statistical scope; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "construction unit"; Average score of acceptance progress (10 points): the average score of the single items with acceptance progress scores in the current city / county within the statistical scope; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "construction unit"; Average score of single expenditure budget ratio (15 points): the average score of single items with single expenditure budget ratio scores in the current city / county within the statistical scope; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "construction unit"; Average score of single design material collection quantity ratio (5 points): the average score of single items with single design material collection quantity ratio scores in the current city / county within the statistical scope; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "construction unit"; Average score of single non-design material collection coding ratio (5 points): the average score of single items with single non-design material collection coding ratio scores that belong to the current city / district / county, are within the statistical scope; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "construction unit": Average score of capital transfer ratio (5 points): the average score of single items with capital transfer ratio scores that belong to the current city / district / county, are within the statistical scope; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "construction unit"; Average score of production safety fee (5 points): the average score of individual items with production safety fee scores in the current city / county within the statistical scope; this column is displayed only when the query condition (responsible unit) is selected as "construction unit"; Query: Project establishment year: The default is the latest year in the current system. Select all years in the system from the drop-down list. Multiple selections are allowed. Statistical deadline: default is the current natural year, month and day; Major: All by default, drop down to select all majors, multiple selections are allowed; Responsible unit: Default is construction unit, drop-down selection: construction unit, supervision unit, design unit, construction unit, single selection; single item start time: time interval selection, year, month, day.

[0042] The data acquisition and monitoring unit 2 collects and analyzes various operating data of individual communication projects in real time, collects individual data from various communication projects, and the data processing layer cleans and pre-processes the data. It mines and analyzes technology through network equipment, system logs and user feedback to check problems and bottlenecks in project operation.

[0043] The project health quality assessment mainly includes the quality of the design stage, the construction quality and supervision quality of the implementation stage, and the quality of the acceptance stage. It assesses whether the various quality management requirements are strictly implemented in the engineering management process to achieve quality goals. If it is found during the spot check and review that the process data is inconsistent with the text or the actual situation on site, the points should be increased. The spot check ratio and spot check personnel are set according to the project specialty.

[0044] Provides the function of quality spot check to check the design, completion, acceptance and quality inspection content of a single item, record the inspection results, deduct points and describe the problems.

[0045] Spot check method: 1. Random spot check: Set the spot check ratio and scope, and the system will randomly select items that meet the requirements; 2. Targeted spot check: Filter out items that meet the requirements through various query conditions. Provincial companies can spot check items across the province, and branches can spot check items of the company. The query conditions include project approval year, item start time (interval), major, construction status, project number, project name, design unit name, construction unit name, and supervision unit name. Among them, the query condition for construction status refers to all items that have completed this stage, for example, "designed" refers to all items that have completed engineering design.

[0046] When the health of the project is lower than a certain threshold, the early warning and alarm mechanism unit 3 automatically triggers an early warning or alarm to remind relevant personnel to handle it in time, effectively avoiding serious problems in the project and ensuring the continuity and stability of communication services.

[0047] The optimization suggestion and decision support unit 4 gives targeted optimization suggestions and improvement measures based on the evaluation results and data analysis.

[0048] Security and Reliability Unit 5 uses appropriate encryption, backup and fault-tolerance technologies to ensure data integrity and availability, and to operate stably in complex and harsh environments.

[0049] The health evaluation model unit 6 automatically calculates and evaluates the health of the project based on the collected data and the evaluation indicators, and performs health evaluation on individual items based on preset rules and algorithms.

[0050] Preset rules: Equipment performance standards: Evaluate whether the performance of communication equipment meets the predetermined technical specifications and requirements, including equipment stability, reliability, compatibility, etc.

[0051] Signal quality indicators: detect the strength, stability and quality of communication signals to ensure that the communication quality within the signal coverage area meets user needs.

[0052] Network security requirements: Evaluate the security of communication networks, including the security of network architecture, encryption of data transmission, and user access authority control.

[0053] Maintenance management specifications: Evaluate the processes, systems and implementation of communication engineering maintenance management to ensure the normal operation of equipment and timely handling of faults.

[0054] Completeness of project documents: Check the completeness and standardization of project documents, including design documents, construction documents, maintenance documents, etc., to ensure the traceability and maintainability of the project.

[0055] Troubleshooting process: Evaluate whether the troubleshooting process in the communication project is efficient and standardized, and whether it can locate and solve problems quickly and accurately.

[0056] Resource utilization efficiency: Evaluate the utilization of resources in communication projects, including equipment resources, spectrum resources, energy resources, etc., to ensure the rational utilization and efficient allocation of resources.

[0057] Environmental adaptability: Evaluate the adaptability and stability of communication equipment under different environmental conditions, including environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and electromagnetic interference.

[0058] Calculate the maximum characteristic root λ to judge the health max and its corresponding eigenvector b=[b1,b2,…,b n ] n , and the feature vector is normalized and used as the weight vector of each indicator.

[0059] Calculate the consistency index: Calculate the consistency ratio: Among them, λ max To determine the maximum eigenvalue of health, n is the number of evaluated indicators, that is, the order corresponding to the health, RI is the average random consistency index, CI is the consistency index, where n is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and RI corresponds to 0, 0, 0.58, 0.89, 1.12, 1.26, 1.36, 1.41, 1.46. After using the above steps to find the maximum eigenvalue and its corresponding eigenvector, it is necessary to use Calculate the consistency ratio and perform consistency test. Generally, if the consistency ratio CR<0.1, it is considered that the health judgment has satisfactory consistency, and the smaller the CR value, the higher the consistency; if CR≥0.1, it is considered that the health judgment is inconsistent and the health judgment needs to be reconstructed.

[0060] The visualization and report generation unit 7 can display the evaluation results, data analysis, optimization suggestions and other information in an intuitive and clear manner. At the same time, the system can also generate various reports and statistical charts to facilitate reporting, auditing and decision-making by all parties.

[0061] A person of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the steps in the various methods of the above embodiments can be completed by instructing related hardware through a program, and the program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and the storage medium may include: a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a disk or an optical disk, etc.

[0062] The specific embodiments described herein are merely examples of the spirit of the present invention. The above embodiments only express several implementation methods of the present invention, and the descriptions thereof are relatively specific and detailed, but they cannot be understood as limiting the scope of the patent of the present invention. It should be pointed out that technicians in the technical field to which the present invention belongs can make various modifications or supplements to the described specific embodiments or replace them in a similar manner, but will not deviate from the spirit of the present invention or exceed the scope defined in the attached claims. For ordinary technicians in this field, multiple deformations and improvements can also be made without departing from the concept of the present invention. Therefore, the scope of protection of the patent of the present invention shall be based on the attached claims.

Claims

1. A communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system, characterized by: It comprises a data acquisition system, which is respectively connected to a monitoring system and an evaluation system. The evaluation system comprises a health evaluation model unit (6). The health evaluation model unit (6) automatically calculates and evaluates the health of the project based on the collected data based on preset rules and algorithms.

2. According to claim 1, a communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system is characterized in that: The data collection system comprises a standardized evaluation index unit (1) and a data collection and monitoring unit (2). The standardized evaluation index unit (1) takes a single project as an evaluation object and carries out an evaluation on the entire life cycle of the project construction.

3. A communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system according to claim 2, characterized in that: The entire life cycle of the engineering construction includes the engineering design phase and the engineering implementation phase, as well as the engineering acceptance phase and the engineering submission phase.

4. A communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system according to claim 2 or 3, characterized in that: The evaluation factors include the quality, progress and cost of the project construction, as well as whether the project construction is compliant and safe.

5. A communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system according to claim 2, characterized in that: The data collection and monitoring unit (2) collects and analyzes various operation data of individual projects in real time, collects individual data from each individual project, and cleans and pre-processes the data.

6. A communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The monitoring system comprises an early warning and alarm mechanism unit (3), an optimization suggestion and decision support unit (4) and a safety and reliability unit (5). When the health of the project is lower than a certain threshold, the early warning and alarm mechanism unit (3) automatically triggers an early warning or an alarm.

7. A communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system according to claim 6, characterized in that: The safety and reliability unit (5) encrypts, backs up and fault-tolerant the process data to ensure the integrity and availability of the data.

8. A communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation system comprises a health evaluation model unit (6), which automatically calculates and evaluates the health of the project based on the collected data and in combination with the evaluation index, and performs health evaluation on a single item based on preset rules and algorithms.

9. A communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system according to claim 1, 3 or 6, characterized in that: It also includes a visualization system, which is connected to the monitoring system and the evaluation system respectively.

10. A communication engineering single item health standardization evaluation system according to claim 9, characterized in that: The visualization system comprises a visualization and report generation unit (7), which generates reports and statistical charts to display evaluation results, data analysis and optimization suggestions.

Images