Carbon emission analysis system suitable for kitchen garbage treatment equipment

Abstract

The invention discloses a carbon emission analysis system suitable for kitchen garbage treatment equipment, relates to the technical field of carbon emission monitoring, solves the technical problem that in the prior art, treatment equipment matched use analysis cannot be performed on a region, and particularly relates to a multi-region carbon emission analysis unit for performing kitchen garbage treatment equipment carbon emission analysis on the region. The method comprises the following steps: collecting regional emission information, obtaining a carbon emission analysis coefficient corresponding to each region, and dividing the region into a high-intensity emission region and a low-intensity emission region according to comparison of the carbon emission analysis coefficients; the equipment cooperative use control unit is used for performing equipment cooperative use control analysis on a high-intensity emission area, dividing kitchen garbage treatment equipment into high-emission equipment and low-emission equipment, dividing a current emission task into composite emission and single emission, collecting and processing distribution quantity information and processing emission quantity information, and sending the information to the control unit; and deducing whether the equipment cooperative use control is efficient or not according to information comparison, if not, carrying out reasonable scheduling, and if so, carrying out the next step.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of carbon emission monitoring, and in particular to a carbon emission analysis system suitable for kitchen waste treatment equipment. Background Art

[0002] Food waste treatment equipment usually uses technologies such as biodegradation, composting, and anaerobic fermentation to convert food waste into useful products such as organic fertilizer and biogas. For example, biodegradation equipment uses microorganisms to decompose organic matter in food waste, while composting equipment promotes the decomposition and stabilization of food waste by controlling conditions such as temperature, humidity, and ventilation.

[0003] The patent with announcement number CN118674172A discloses a method and system for calculating the carbon footprint of kitchen waste disposal, which comprises the following steps: recycling kitchen waste according to a first set period to obtain the amount of recycled kitchen waste; obtaining the treatment method and the number of treatment methods for the kitchen waste; sampling the kitchen waste according to a second set period to obtain a test sample; the method and system for calculating the carbon footprint of kitchen waste disposal, by regularly testing the carbon emissions, i.e., the carbon footprint, of each treatment method of kitchen waste, obtains the carbon emission factor of the corresponding period, thereby making the carbon emission factor more accurate and improving the accuracy of the predicted carbon footprint.

[0004] However, in the existing technology, it is impossible to conduct carbon emission analysis on the amount of waste to be treated in each area when treating food waste, so that it is impossible to make reasonable treatment plans for each area. At the same time, it is impossible to analyze the coordinated use of treatment equipment in the region, which reduces the utilization efficiency of food waste treatment equipment. In addition, it is impossible to analyze the food waste treatment trend in each area, resulting in the waste treatment efficiency not being in the optimal state.

[0005] In view of the above technical defects, a solution is now proposed. Summary of the invention

[0006] The purpose of the present invention is to solve the above-mentioned problems and to propose a carbon emission analysis system suitable for kitchen waste treatment equipment.

[0007] The purpose of the present invention can be achieved through the following technical solutions:

[0008] A carbon emission analysis system applicable to kitchen waste treatment equipment, including a carbon emission management platform, which is communicatively connected to a multi-region carbon emission analysis unit, an equipment coordination control unit, and a logistics transportation analysis unit;

[0009] The multi-region carbon emission analysis unit conducts carbon emission analysis of food waste treatment equipment in the region, collects regional emission information, and substitutes it into the formula to obtain the corresponding carbon emission analysis coefficient of each region. According to the comparison of carbon emission analysis coefficients, the region is divided into high-intensity emission area and low-intensity emission area;

[0010] The equipment coordination control unit analyzes the equipment coordination control in the high-intensity emission area, divides the food waste treatment equipment into high-emission equipment and low-emission equipment, and divides the current emission task into compound emission and single emission. It collects the processing allocation information and the processing emission information, and infers whether the equipment coordination control is efficient based on the information comparison. If not, it will make reasonable scheduling. If yes, it will proceed to the next step.

[0011] The material transportation analysis unit conducts material transportation analysis on high-intensity emission areas, collects route impact information and driving impact information, and infers whether material transportation is normal based on information comparison and analysis.

[0012] As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the regional emission information includes the numerical ratio of the increasing speed of the demand processing volume of food waste treatment equipment in each region to the maximum average speed of food waste treatment corresponding to the food waste treatment equipment in the current region, the non-intersecting period duration of the waste treatment efficiency adjustment cycle of the food waste treatment equipment in each region and the high-span increase period of the regional food waste output, the carbon emissions of the corresponding treatment methods of the food waste treatment equipment in each region and the numerical ratio of the growth span of the carbon emissions of the corresponding treatment methods, and corresponding labels SVB, JZS, and KDB are set.

[0013] As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the formula is:

[0014] Among them, PF is the carbon emission analysis coefficient, fsz1, fsz2 and fsz3 are preset proportional coefficients, e is a natural constant, and β is an error correction factor with a value of 1.12.

[0015] As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, if the corresponding carbon emission analysis coefficient exceeds the carbon emission analysis coefficient threshold, the corresponding area is marked as a high-intensity emission area; if the corresponding carbon emission analysis coefficient does not exceed the carbon emission analysis coefficient threshold, the corresponding area is marked as a low-intensity emission area.

[0016] As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the processing allocation amount information and the processing emission amount information are respectively the maximum proportion of the processing amount of the same type of emission mode of the corresponding composite emission equipment and the single emission equipment to the total task processing amount when the type of processed garbage continues to increase at the current moment in the high-intensity emission area, and the numerical ratio of the carbon emissions processed by the corresponding composite emission low emission equipment to the carbon emissions of the single emission when the same type of processed garbage exists in the composite emission and single emission in the high-intensity emission area.

[0017] As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, if the processing allocation amount information exceeds the maximum proportion threshold, or the processing emission amount information does not exceed the emission amount numerical ratio threshold, a planning scheduling signal is generated; if the processing allocation amount information does not exceed the maximum proportion threshold, and the processing emission amount information exceeds the emission amount numerical ratio threshold, an optimal processing signal is generated.

[0018] As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the route impact information and the driving impact information are respectively the numerical ratio of the fuel consumption carbon emissions of the overlapping routes corresponding to the preset kitchen waste recycling points in the high-intensity emission area and the set planning time to reduce the fuel consumption carbon emissions of the overlapping routes, and the total number of moments when the expected carbon emissions of planned driving on the recycling routes in the high-intensity emission area are lower than the actual driving carbon emissions.

[0019] As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, if the route impact information exceeds the emission value ratio threshold, or the driving impact information exceeds the total number ratio threshold at a time, a transportation control signal is generated; if the route impact information does not exceed the emission value ratio threshold, and the driving impact information does not exceed the total number ratio threshold at a time, a transportation qualification signal is generated.

[0020] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0021] 1. In the present invention, the carbon emission of kitchen waste treatment equipment in the region is analyzed to infer whether the carbon emission of kitchen waste treatment equipment in each region exceeds the standard, so as to evaluate the waste treatment efficiency of each region, thereby inferring the feasibility of waste treatment execution in each region, facilitating the distribution control of the region to ensure the waste treatment efficiency of the region, and avoiding the waste treatment execution intensity of the region being too high or even unable to adapt to the waste generation demand of the region;

[0022] Conduct equipment coordination control analysis on high-intensity emission areas to infer whether the coordinated use control of the corresponding food waste treatment equipment when the current area is conducting carbon emissions meets the treatment needs of the current area, thereby reducing the utilization efficiency of the food waste treatment equipment in the area, and avoid reducing the treatment efficiency of the food waste treatment equipment due to lack of usage planning, resulting in waste in the operating costs of the food waste treatment equipment.

[0023] 2. In the present invention, material transportation analysis is performed on high-intensity emission areas to infer whether the material transportation efficiency corresponding to the garbage treatment stage in the current high-intensity emission area meets the actual demand, so as to reasonably control the material transportation and ensure the reasonable control of carbon emissions generated by transportation during kitchen waste treatment, and avoid the increase of carbon emissions due to the transportation process after the garbage treatment equipment is reasonably scheduled, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the overall kitchen waste treatment in the area;

[0024] Conduct emission area analysis on food waste production areas, and evaluate the impact of food waste at each stage during the food waste treatment process in each area, so as to infer whether there is fluctuation in the impact of food waste in the area, so as to adjust the treatment plan in time when the food waste treatment efficiency decreases, and ensure that the carbon emissions from food waste treatment are planned and treated in the optimal emission mode, so that the food waste treatment efficiency is in the optimal state. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0025] In order to facilitate understanding by those skilled in the art, the present invention is further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0026] Figure 1 This is a principle block diagram of Embodiment 1 of the present invention;

[0027] Figure 2 This is a principle block diagram of the second embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0028] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the scheme of the present invention, the technical scheme in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0029] Reference to "embodiments" herein means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in conjunction with the embodiments may be included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. The appearance of the phrase in various places in the specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, nor is it an independent or alternative embodiment that is mutually exclusive with other embodiments. It is explicitly and implicitly understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments described herein may be combined with other embodiments.

[0030] Embodiment 1

[0031] See also Figure 1 As shown, a carbon emission analysis system suitable for kitchen waste treatment equipment includes a carbon emission management platform, which is communicatively connected to a multi-region carbon emission analysis unit, an equipment coordination control unit, and a logistics transportation analysis unit;

[0032] The carbon emission management platform generates a multi-region carbon emission analysis signal and sends the multi-region carbon emission analysis signal to the multi-region carbon emission analysis unit. After receiving the multi-region carbon emission analysis signal, the multi-region carbon emission analysis unit performs carbon emission analysis on the regional kitchen waste treatment equipment to infer whether the carbon emissions of the kitchen waste treatment equipment in each region currently exceed the emission standards, so as to evaluate the waste treatment efficiency of each region, thereby inferring the feasibility of waste treatment execution in each region, facilitating the distributed control of the region to ensure the waste treatment efficiency of the region, and avoiding the waste treatment execution intensity of the region being too high or even unable to adapt to the waste generation demand of the region;

[0033] Obtain the numerical ratio of the increasing speed of the required processing volume of the food waste treatment equipment in each area to the maximum average processing speed of the food waste treatment equipment in the current area, and at the same time obtain the non-intersecting cycle length of the waste treatment efficiency adjustment cycle of the food waste treatment equipment in each area and the high-span increase cycle of the regional food waste output, where the efficiency adjustment cycle is represented by the amount of waste processed per unit time by all food waste treatment equipment in the current area, and the high-span increase cycle is represented by the increase span of food waste in the current cycle exceeding 30% of the amount of food waste processed in the previous cycle;

[0034] The ratio of the increase rate of the demand for food waste treatment equipment in each region to the highest average rate of food waste treatment corresponding to the current regional food waste treatment equipment, and the non-intersection period length of the waste treatment efficiency adjustment period of the food waste treatment equipment in each region and the high span increase period of regional food waste output are marked as SVB and JZS respectively;

[0035] Obtain the numerical ratio of the carbon emissions of the kitchen waste treatment equipment corresponding to the treatment method in each region to the carbon emissions growth span of the corresponding treatment method, and mark the numerical ratio of the carbon emissions of the kitchen waste treatment equipment corresponding to the treatment method in each region to the carbon emissions growth span of the corresponding treatment method as KDB;

[0036] The above collected data are uniformly marked as regional emission information, and substituted into the formula to obtain the corresponding carbon emission analysis coefficient of each region. The specific formula is: Wherein, PF is the carbon emission analysis coefficient, fsz1, fsz2 and fsz3 are preset proportional coefficients, e is a natural constant, and β is an error correction factor with a value of 1.12;

[0037] Compare the carbon emission analysis coefficients corresponding to each region with the carbon emission analysis coefficient threshold:

[0038] If the carbon emission analysis coefficient corresponding to each area exceeds the carbon emission analysis coefficient threshold, it is inferred that the carbon emission analysis of the corresponding area is abnormal, the corresponding area is marked as a high-intensity emission area, and the corresponding number is sent to the carbon emission management platform;

[0039] If the carbon emission analysis coefficient corresponding to each area does not exceed the carbon emission analysis coefficient threshold, it is inferred that the carbon emission analysis of the corresponding area is normal, the corresponding area is marked as a low-intensity emission area, and the corresponding number is sent to the carbon emission management platform;

[0040] Subsequently, a device coordination control signal is generated and sent to the device coordination control unit. After receiving the device coordination control signal, the device coordination control unit performs device coordination control analysis on the high-intensity emission area to infer whether the coordination control of the corresponding food waste treatment equipment during carbon emissions in the current area meets the treatment needs of the current area, thereby reducing the use efficiency of the food waste treatment equipment in the area, thereby avoiding reducing the treatment efficiency of the food waste treatment equipment due to lack of use planning, resulting in waste in the operation cost of the food waste treatment equipment;

[0041] The kitchen waste treatment equipment is divided into high-emission equipment and low-emission equipment, specifically high-emission equipment and low-emission equipment. The emission methods in the prior art are landfill, comprehensive treatment, crushing and direct discharge, composting, and anaerobic digestion, and the current emission task is divided into composite emission and single emission. Among them, composite emission means that both high-emission equipment and low-emission equipment can emit. This type of composite emission method is for the emission deviation of high and low emission equipment within the set range. On the contrary, single emission is represented by only high-emission equipment or low-emission equipment.

[0042] The maximum proportion of the treatment capacity of the same type of emission mode of the composite emission equipment and the single emission equipment to the total treatment capacity of the task is obtained when the type of garbage being treated at the current moment in the high-intensity emission area continues to increase. At the same time, the numerical ratio of the carbon emissions treated by the composite emission low emission equipment to the carbon emissions of the single emission when the same type of garbage is treated in the composite emission and single emission in the high-intensity emission area is obtained. The maximum proportion of the treatment capacity of the same type of emission mode of the composite emission equipment and the single emission equipment to the total treatment capacity of the task when the type of garbage being treated at the current moment in the high-intensity emission area continues to increase, and the numerical ratio of the carbon emissions treated by the composite emission low emission equipment to the carbon emissions of the single emission when the same type of garbage is treated in the composite emission and single emission in the high-intensity emission area are marked as treatment allocation information and treatment emission information, and are compared with the maximum proportion threshold and the emission value ratio threshold respectively:

[0043] If the types of garbage being processed at the current moment in the high-intensity emission area continue to increase, the maximum proportion of the corresponding composite emission equipment and the single emission equipment's same type of emission mode processing capacity to the total task processing capacity exceeds the maximum proportion threshold, or when the composite emission and single emission in the high-intensity emission area have the same type of garbage processed, the numerical ratio of the carbon emissions processed by the corresponding composite emission low-emission equipment to the carbon emissions of the single emission does not exceed the emission numerical ratio threshold, then it is inferred that the equipment coordination control in the current high-intensity emission area is inefficient, and a planning and scheduling signal is generated and sent to the carbon emission management platform. After receiving the planning and scheduling signal, the carbon emission management platform reasonably schedules the use of kitchen waste treatment equipment in the high-intensity emission area according to the type of garbage, and gives priority to the use of low-emission equipment without affecting the progress of garbage treatment;

[0044] If the types of garbage being processed at the current moment in the high-intensity emission area continue to increase, the maximum proportion of the corresponding composite emission equipment and the single emission equipment's same type of emission mode processing volume to the total task processing volume does not exceed the maximum proportion threshold, and when the composite emission and single emission in the high-intensity emission area have the same type of garbage processed, the numerical ratio of the carbon emissions processed by the corresponding composite emission low-emission equipment to the carbon emissions of the single emission exceeds the emission numerical ratio threshold, it is inferred that the equipment in the current high-intensity emission area is efficiently controlled, and the optimal processing signal is generated and sent to the carbon emission management platform;

[0045] At the same time, a material transportation analysis signal is generated and sent to the material transportation analysis unit. After receiving the material transportation analysis signal, the material transportation analysis unit performs material transportation analysis on the high-intensity emission area to infer whether the material transportation efficiency corresponding to the garbage treatment stage in the current high-intensity emission area meets the actual demand, so as to reasonably carry out material transportation control and ensure that the carbon emissions generated by transportation are reasonably controlled during the treatment of kitchen waste, so as to avoid the increase of carbon emissions due to the transportation process after the garbage treatment equipment is reasonably scheduled, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the overall kitchen waste treatment in the area;

[0046] The numerical ratio of the carbon emissions of fuel consumption corresponding to the overlapping routes of the preset kitchen waste recycling points in the high-intensity emission area and the carbon emissions of fuel consumption of the overlapping routes reduced by the set planning time is obtained. At the same time, the total number of moments when the expected carbon emissions of planned driving on the recycling routes in the high-intensity emission area are lower than the actual driving carbon emissions are obtained. The numerical ratio of the carbon emissions of fuel consumption corresponding to the overlapping routes of the preset kitchen waste recycling points in the high-intensity emission area and the carbon emissions of fuel consumption of the overlapping routes reduced by the set planning time, and the total number of moments when the expected carbon emissions of planned driving on the recycling routes in the high-intensity emission area are lower than the actual driving carbon emissions are marked as route impact information and driving impact information, respectively, and compared with the emission value ratio threshold and the total number of moments ratio threshold, respectively:

[0047] If the ratio of the carbon emissions of fuel consumption of overlapping routes corresponding to preset kitchen waste recycling points in high-intensity emission areas to the carbon emissions of fuel consumption of overlapping routes reduced during the set planning time exceeds the emission value ratio threshold, or the total number of moments when the expected carbon emissions of planned driving on the recycling routes in the high-intensity emission areas are lower than the actual carbon emissions exceeds the total number of moments ratio threshold, it is inferred that the material transportation analysis in the high-intensity emission area is abnormal, and a transportation control signal is generated and sent to the carbon emission management platform. After receiving the transportation control signal, the carbon emission management platform re-plans the kitchen waste recycling routes in the high-intensity emission areas to reduce the distance of overlapping routes, and at the same time controls the driving of recycling vehicles to reduce the increase in carbon emissions caused by the fluctuating driving speed;

[0048] If the ratio of the carbon emissions of fuel consumption corresponding to the overlapping routes of the preset kitchen waste recycling points in the high-intensity emission area to the carbon emissions of fuel consumption of the overlapping routes reduced by the set planning time does not exceed the emission value ratio threshold, and the total number of moments when the expected carbon emissions of planned driving on the recycling routes in the high-intensity emission area are lower than the actual driving carbon emissions does not exceed the total number of moments ratio threshold, it is inferred that the material transportation analysis in the high-intensity emission area is normal, and a qualified transportation signal is generated and sent to the carbon emission management platform;

[0049] Embodiment 2

[0050] This embodiment adds an emission trend analysis unit based on the previous embodiment. Figure 2 As shown, the carbon emission management platform is connected to the emission trend analysis unit in communication;

[0051] The carbon emission management platform generates an emission trend analysis signal and sends the emission trend analysis signal to the emission trend analysis unit. After receiving the emission trend analysis signal, the emission trend analysis unit conducts emission area analysis on the food waste production area, and evaluates the impact of food waste at various stages during the food waste treatment process in each area, so as to infer whether there is fluctuation in the impact of food waste in the area, so as to adjust the treatment plan in time when the food waste treatment efficiency decreases, and ensure that the carbon emissions of food waste treatment are planned and treated in the optimal emission mode, so that the food waste treatment efficiency is in the optimal state;

[0052] The span value ratio of the decreasing span of the carbon emission deviation value corresponding to different emission modes of the composite emission modes in the high-intensity emission area and the increasing span of the mean carbon emission value corresponding to the single emission mode is obtained. At the same time, the speed ratio of the decreasing speed of the kitchen waste treatment period and the increasing speed of the peak carbon emission value of the kitchen waste treatment in the low-intensity emission area is obtained. The span value ratio of the decreasing span of the carbon emission deviation value corresponding to different emission modes of the composite emission modes in the high-intensity emission area and the increasing span of the mean carbon emission value corresponding to the single emission mode, and the speed ratio of the decreasing speed of the kitchen waste treatment period and the increasing speed of the peak carbon emission value of the kitchen waste treatment in the low-intensity emission area are marked as span trend data and speed trend data, respectively, and compared with the span value ratio threshold and the speed value ratio threshold, respectively:

[0053] If the ratio of the decreasing span of the carbon emission deviation values ​​corresponding to different emission modes of the composite emission modes in the high-intensity emission area to the increasing span of the average carbon emission values ​​corresponding to the single emission mode exceeds the span ratio threshold, and the ratio of the decreasing speed of the kitchen waste treatment period in the low-intensity emission area to the increasing speed of the peak carbon emission value of the kitchen waste treatment exceeds the speed ratio threshold, it is inferred that the emission trend analysis of the kitchen waste treatment area is stable, a trend constant signal is generated and the trend constant signal is sent to the carbon emission management platform;

[0054] If the span value ratio of the decreasing span of the carbon emission deviation value corresponding to different emission modes of the composite emission modes in the high-intensity emission area and the increasing span of the carbon emission mean value corresponding to the single emission mode does not exceed the span value ratio threshold, or the speed ratio of the reduction speed of the kitchen waste treatment period in the low-intensity emission area and the peak rising speed of the carbon emission from the kitchen waste treatment does not exceed the speed value ratio threshold, it is inferred that the emission trend analysis of the kitchen waste treatment area is unstable, and a trend abnormality signal is generated and sent to the carbon emission management platform; after receiving the trend abnormality signal, the carbon emission management platform controls the amount of kitchen waste in the current area and optimizes the kitchen waste treatment method to reduce the carbon emissions of each treatment method as much as possible;

[0055] The above formulas are obtained by collecting a large amount of data and performing software simulation, and a formula close to the actual value is selected. The coefficients in the formula are set by technicians in this field according to actual conditions;

[0056] When the present invention is in use, the multi-region carbon emission analysis unit performs carbon emission analysis of food waste treatment equipment in the region, collects regional emission information, and substitutes it into the formula to obtain the corresponding carbon emission analysis coefficient of each region, and divides the region into a high-intensity emission region and a low-intensity emission region according to the carbon emission analysis coefficient comparison; the equipment coordination control unit performs equipment coordination control analysis on the high-intensity emission area, divides the food waste treatment equipment into high-emission equipment and low-emission equipment, and divides the current emission task into compound emission and single emission, collects and processes allocation information and processing emission information, and infers whether the equipment coordination control is efficient based on information comparison, if not, performs reasonable scheduling, and if yes, proceeds to the next step; the material transportation analysis unit performs material transportation analysis on the high-intensity emission area, collects route impact information and driving impact information, and infers whether the material transportation is normal based on information comparison analysis.

[0057] The preferred embodiments of the present invention disclosed above are only used to help explain the present invention. The preferred embodiments do not describe all the details in detail, nor do they limit the invention to only specific implementation methods. Obviously, many modifications and changes can be made according to the content of this specification. This specification selects and specifically describes these embodiments in order to better explain the principles and practical applications of the present invention, so that those skilled in the art can understand and use the present invention well. The present invention is limited only by the claims and their full scope and equivalents.

Claims

1. A carbon emission analysis system for kitchen waste treatment equipment, characterized in that: It includes a carbon emission management platform, which is connected to a multi-region carbon emission analysis unit, an equipment coordination control unit, and a logistics transportation analysis unit; The multi-region carbon emission analysis unit conducts carbon emission analysis of food waste treatment equipment in the region, collects regional emission information, and substitutes it into the formula to obtain the corresponding carbon emission analysis coefficient of each region. According to the comparison of carbon emission analysis coefficients, the region is divided into high-intensity emission area and low-intensity emission area; The equipment coordination control unit analyzes the equipment coordination control in the high-intensity emission area, divides the food waste treatment equipment into high-emission equipment and low-emission equipment, and divides the current emission task into compound emission and single emission. It collects the processing allocation information and the processing emission information, and infers whether the equipment coordination control is efficient based on the information comparison. If not, it will make reasonable scheduling. If yes, it will proceed to the next step. The material transportation analysis unit conducts material transportation analysis on high-intensity emission areas, collects route impact information and driving impact information, and infers whether material transportation is normal based on information comparison and analysis.

2. The carbon emission analysis system for kitchen waste treatment equipment according to claim 1, characterized in that: The regional emission information includes the numerical ratio of the increasing speed of the demand for food waste treatment equipment in each region to the maximum average speed of food waste treatment corresponding to the current regional food waste treatment equipment, the non-intersecting cycle duration of the waste treatment efficiency adjustment cycle of the food waste treatment equipment in each region and the high-span increase cycle of the regional food waste output, the numerical ratio of the carbon emissions of the corresponding treatment methods of the food waste treatment equipment in each region to the growth span of the carbon emissions of the corresponding treatment methods, and the corresponding labels SVB, JZS, and KDB are set.

3. The carbon emission analysis system for kitchen waste treatment equipment according to claim 2, characterized in that: The formula is: Among them, PF is the carbon emission analysis coefficient, fsz1, fsz2 and fsz3 are preset proportional coefficients, e is a natural constant, and β is an error correction factor with a value of 1.

12.

4. The carbon emission analysis system for kitchen waste treatment equipment according to claim 3 is characterized in that: If the corresponding carbon emission analysis coefficient exceeds the carbon emission analysis coefficient threshold, the corresponding area will be marked as a high-intensity emission area; if the corresponding carbon emission analysis coefficient does not exceed the carbon emission analysis coefficient threshold, the corresponding area will be marked as a low-intensity emission area.

5. The carbon emission analysis system for kitchen waste treatment equipment according to claim 1, characterized in that: The processing allocation quantity information and the processing emission quantity information are respectively the maximum proportion of the processing quantity of the same type of emission mode of the composite emission equipment and the single emission equipment to the total processing quantity of the task when the types of garbage being processed at the current moment in the high-intensity emission area continue to increase, and the numerical ratio of the carbon emissions processed by the composite emission low-emission equipment to the carbon emissions of the single emission when the same type of garbage is processed for composite emission and single emission in the high-intensity emission area.

6. The carbon emission analysis system for kitchen waste treatment equipment according to claim 5, characterized in that: If the processing allocation amount information exceeds the maximum proportion threshold, or the processing emission amount information does not exceed the emission amount numerical ratio threshold, a planning scheduling signal is generated; if the processing allocation amount information does not exceed the maximum proportion threshold, and the processing emission amount information exceeds the emission amount numerical ratio threshold, an optimal processing signal is generated.

7. The carbon emission analysis system for kitchen waste treatment equipment according to claim 1, characterized in that: The route impact information and driving impact information are the numerical ratio of the fuel consumption carbon emissions of the overlapping routes corresponding to the preset kitchen waste recycling points in the high-intensity emission area and the set planning time to reduce the fuel consumption carbon emissions of the overlapping routes, and the total proportion of moments when the expected carbon emissions of planned driving on the recycling routes in the high-intensity emission area are lower than the actual driving carbon emissions.

8. The carbon emission analysis system for kitchen waste treatment equipment according to claim 7, characterized in that: If the route impact information exceeds the emission value ratio threshold, or the driving impact information exceeds the time If the total quantity ratio threshold is exceeded, a transport control signal is generated; if the route impact information does not exceed the emission value ratio threshold, If the traffic impact information does not exceed the total number of time periods, a qualified transportation signal is generated.

Images