Method for checking hidden dangers of same routing of optical cable

Abstract

The invention provides a method for checking hidden dangers of an optical cable same route, and the method comprises the steps: building a same route resource model according to the information of a reserved relay section during the construction of a network; when same-route troubleshooting needs to be carried out, relay sections needing to be detected in the same-route self-selection model are screened out according to the pre-detection position, hidden danger risk assessment is carried out on the relay sections needing to be detected, the detection priority is obtained, and then same-route hidden danger detection analysis is carried out according to the detection priority. Wherein the same-route hidden danger detection analysis comprises same-site detection, same-optical-cable-section detection, same-laying-section detection, cross-route detection and adjacent-route detection. And carrying out same-route hidden danger detection analysis according to the detection priority, namely, setting different detection priorities according to different conditions, thereby obtaining fault information and carrying out fault processing.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of co-routing hidden dangers, and in particular to a method for troubleshooting co-routing hidden dangers of optical cables. Background Art

[0002] At present, in the existing technology, for a long time, the number of operators' various external engineering construction projects has gradually increased, and some units have not carried out standardized construction, which has posed a serious threat to the operators' communication pipelines and optical cables. In view of the many failures that have occurred in the transmission network due to the damage of optical cables during construction, it is necessary to attach great importance to and strengthen line inspections and monitoring, carry out the investigation and rectification of hidden dangers on the same route, and effectively improve the safe operation capacity of the transmission network.

[0003] Due to resource and environmental constraints, network construction cannot achieve physical dual-route protection for each link, so the same-route hidden danger has a great impact on network services. To solve the above problems, the conventional manual same-route analysis method is mainly used in the maintenance of the existing network. The topological data in the system is used to carry out manual same-route hidden danger analysis, and the analyzed same-route sections are optimized. However, the efficiency of manual same-route hidden danger analysis is low, and the update speed of existing network resources is fast, while the update of dumb resource related data is relatively lagging, which seriously affects the accuracy of the analysis results. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present invention aims to solve at least one of the technical problems existing in the prior art or related art.

[0005] To this end, a first aspect of the present invention provides a method for troubleshooting hidden dangers of optical cable co-routing.

[0006] A second aspect of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium.

[0007] In view of this, the first aspect of the present invention provides a method for troubleshooting hidden dangers of the same route of optical cables, comprising: establishing a same route resource model based on the information of the relay segment; obtaining the pre-detected relay segment in the same route resource model based on the pre-detection position; performing a hidden danger risk assessment on the pre-detected relay segment to obtain a detection priority; performing a same route hidden danger detection analysis based on the detection priority to obtain fault information; performing fault handling based on the fault information; wherein the same route hidden danger detection analysis includes same-site detection, same optical cable segment detection, same laying segment detection, cross-route detection and adjacent route detection.

[0008] In addition, the method for troubleshooting optical cable co-routing hazards in the above technical solution provided by the present invention may also have the following additional technical features: In some technical solutions of the present invention, optionally, a hidden danger risk assessment is performed on the pre-detected relay segment to obtain a detection priority, including: obtaining a preset detection priority and a priority parameter of the pre-detected relay segment; based on the priority parameter, adjusting the preset priority to obtain the detection priority; wherein the priority parameters include a preset service level, a historical failure probability, a repair difficulty coefficient and a climate parameter.

[0009] In some technical solutions of the present invention, optionally, the preset priorities include: same-site detection, same optical cable segment detection, same laying segment detection, cross-route detection and adjacent route detection are sorted in descending order of priority.

[0010] In some technical schemes of the present invention, optionally, based on the detection priority, a same-route hidden danger detection analysis is performed to obtain fault information, including: if the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is a same-site detection, based on two pre-detected relay segments, obtaining a first optical exchange site set and a second optical exchange site set; judging whether the first optical exchange site set and the second optical exchange site set have the same site, if the first optical exchange site set and the second optical exchange site set have the same site, determining that the same-site situation exists, otherwise, continuing the same-route hidden danger detection analysis according to the detection priority.

[0011] In some technical schemes of the present invention, optionally, based on the detection priority, the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis is performed to obtain fault information, and also includes: if the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis is the same optical cable segment detection, based on two pre-detected relay segments, obtaining the first relay segment coordinate set and the second relay segment coordinate set; judging whether the first relay segment coordinate set and the second relay segment coordinate set have the same coordinates, if the first relay segment coordinate set and the second relay segment coordinate set have the same coordinates, then determining the same optical cable segment situation; otherwise, continuing the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis according to the detection priority.

[0012] In some technical schemes of the present invention, optionally, based on the detection priority, same-route hidden danger detection and analysis is performed to obtain fault information, and also includes: if the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis is a same-laying section detection, based on two pre-detected relay sections, obtaining the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set; judging whether the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set have the same bearer facility number; if the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set have the same number, it is determined that the same laying section exists; otherwise, continuing the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis according to the detection priority.

[0013] In some technical solutions of the present invention, optionally, based on the detection priority, the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis is performed to obtain fault information, and it also includes: if the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis is an adjacent route detection, based on the longitude and latitude of the two pre-detected relay segments, the vector information of the two relay segments is obtained; based on the vector information, it is determined whether the angle between the two pre-detected relay segments exceeds 90°. If the vector angle exceeds 90°, it is determined that an adjacent route exists, and an adjacent route analysis is performed on the two pre-detected relay segments; otherwise, the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis continues according to the detection priority.

[0014] In some technical schemes of the present invention, optionally, based on the detection priority, the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is performed to obtain fault information, and also includes: if the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is a cross-route detection, based on the longitude and latitude of two pre-detected relay segments, the vector information of the two relay segments, the difference in longitude at the starting point of the two relay segments, the difference in latitude at the starting point of the two relay segments, the difference in longitude at the end point of the two relay segments, and the difference in latitude at the end point of the two relay segments are obtained; based on the vector information, the difference in longitude and latitude at the starting point and the difference in longitude and latitude at the end point, it is determined whether there is an intersection; if there is an intersection, it is determined that there is a cross-route; otherwise, the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is continued according to the detection priority.

[0015] In some technical solutions of the present invention, optionally, a proximity routing analysis is performed on two pre-detected relay segments, including: dividing one of the pre-detected relay segments into multiple line segments of equal length, and calculating the distance from the line segment to the other pre-detected relay segment respectively; if the distance is less than a threshold, it is determined that the line segment has a proximity routing.

[0016] A second aspect of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a program or instruction is stored. When the program or instruction is executed by a processor, a method for troubleshooting optical cable co-routing hazards as in any of the above technical solutions is implemented.

[0017] Additional aspects and advantages of the present invention will be given in part in the following description and in part will be obvious from the following description, or will be learned through practice of the present invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0018] The above and / or additional aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent and easily understood from the description of the embodiments in conjunction with the following drawings, in which: Figure 1 This is one of the flow charts of a method for troubleshooting hidden dangers of optical cable co-routing according to an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0019] In order to more clearly understand the above-mentioned purpose, features and advantages of the present invention, the present invention is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. It should be noted that the embodiments of the present application and the features in the embodiments can be combined with each other without conflict.

[0020] In the following description, many specific details are set forth to facilitate a full understanding of the present invention. However, the present invention may also be implemented in other ways different from those described herein. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed below.

[0021] Refer to the following Figure 1 A method for troubleshooting optical cable co-routing hazards according to some embodiments of the present invention is described.

[0022] like Figure 1 As shown, the first aspect of the present invention provides a method for troubleshooting hidden dangers of optical cable co-routing, comprising: Step 102, establishing a same-route resource model based on the relay segment information; Step 104, based on the pre-detected position, obtaining the pre-detected relay segment in the same routing resource model; Step 106, performing a hidden danger risk assessment on the pre-detected relay segment to obtain a detection priority; Step 108, based on the detection priority, perform the same route hidden danger detection analysis to obtain fault information; Step 110, performing fault processing based on the fault information; Among them, the same route hidden danger detection and analysis includes same site detection, same optical cable section detection, same laying section detection, cross-route detection and adjacent route detection.

[0023] The present invention provides a method for checking the hidden dangers of the same route of optical cables, wherein a same route resource model is established according to the reserved relay segment information during network construction. When it is necessary to check the same route, the relay segments required for pre-detection in the same route self-selection model are screened out according to the pre-detection position, and the hidden danger risk assessment is performed on these pre-detected relay segments to obtain the detection priority, and then the same route hidden danger detection analysis is performed according to the detection priority, wherein the same route hidden danger detection analysis includes same site detection, same optical cable segment detection, same laying segment detection, cross-route detection and adjacent route detection. The same route hidden danger detection analysis is performed according to the detection priority, that is, different detection priorities are set according to different situations, so as to obtain fault information and perform fault processing.

[0024] This method is based on the same-route troubleshooting solution for the entire life cycle of optical cables. The method of analyzing the same-route hidden dangers with the relay segment as the entry point supports the analysis of multiple types of same-route hidden dangers, including the same optical cable segment, the same site, the same laying segment, adjacent routes and cross-routes. At the same time, combined with the association between networks at all levels, a hidden danger troubleshooting model based on layering, scenarios and levels is established to support business-oriented end-to-end analysis, so as to effectively analyze business security, efficiently troubleshoot existing hidden dangers, and provide a complete solution for existing same-route hidden dangers, effectively improving network security.

[0025] Specifically, based on the fault information, fault handling includes: providing the relevant operator management personnel with a hidden danger work order to be processed through mobile phone text messages, APP message push and PC system pop-up windows.

[0026] Specifically, after the fault processing is performed based on the fault information, it includes: one-click verification of the hidden dangers of the same route in the hidden danger database, confirmation that the hidden dangers have been rectified, and root cause analysis of the hidden dangers.

[0027] Specifically, after the fault is handled based on the fault information, preventive measures for similar hidden dangers are formulated.

[0028] When designing and opening services, use the external line resource data of the Cable Doctor system, fiber core quality, routing direction and other data to plan the service optical path group.

[0029] (1) The system can support the verification of all optical cable segment information between the two stations A / Z. For example, if you input station A / station Z, the system can determine how many direct optical cable segments exist between the two stations, as well as the number of idle fiber cores in each optical cable segment and the number of available fiber cores.

[0030] (2) The system can give an early warning of optical cable utilization based on the direct optical cable data between the A / Z stations and the number of available fiber cores. For example, if there are few direct optical cable sections between the A / Z stations and the fiber core occupancy rate is high, it is recommended to relocate some services or expand the fiber core capacity.

[0031] (3) The system can automatically plan multiple optical cable routes based on the A / Z end site name and the fiber core performance. If there are no idle fiber cores or cable segments in all routes, the system should aim to open up the entire path, generate an instant connection plan (including the shortest hop or the least hop plan), and present the macro planning plan on the map.

[0032] (4) The planned routing information should include the number of fiber jumper nodes, total loss, and average loss; (5) The system can classify the planned routes, including: minimum attenuation route, minimum fiber jump node route, minimum fiber jump site route, etc.

[0033] The above points form the online planning capability of the optical cable network, exclude the same routing situation and provide a planning plan before the actual business migration and fiber jump. You can also view the routing details of the optical path group based on GIS in real time to compare whether the business optical paths have the same routing.

[0034] Specifically, based on the information of the relay segment, a same-route resource model is established, including: docking with the transmission workbench: based on the transmission workbench interface, the full amount of transmission systems, transmission subnets, transmission circuits, network elements and port resources in the transmission workbench are obtained, the topological connection relationship of the transmission system and the transmission subnet is parsed, the network element name-port information of the batch topological segment based on the adjacent network elements is obtained, and the end-to-end circuit related information is obtained; docking with the transmission network management: an EOTDR data management module is established, and the transmission network management is connected through the relevant interface to obtain the online EOTDR test file of the optical cable of the optical amplifier segment, the A\Z end network elements and port information involved in the optical amplifier segment; the above docking information is synchronized to the relay segment resources and fiber core resources of this system for matching; at the same time, model matching is performed with the site, optical cable segment, laying segment and business.

[0035] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, a hidden danger risk assessment is performed on the pre-detected relay segment to obtain a detection priority, including: obtaining a preset detection priority and a priority parameter of the pre-detected relay segment; based on the priority parameter, adjusting the preset priority to obtain the detection priority; wherein the priority parameters include a preset service level, a historical failure probability, a repair difficulty coefficient and a climate parameter.

[0036] In this embodiment, the present invention is provided with a preset detection priority and a priority parameter that can affect the priority sorting, and the preset priority is adjusted according to the priority parameter, and the detection priority is obtained. Among them, the priority parameter includes a preset service level, a historical failure probability, a repair difficulty coefficient, and a climate parameter. The method is adapted to local conditions and dynamically adjusts the priority according to the actual situation of the pre-detected relay segment, thereby improving the detection efficiency.

[0037] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, the preset priorities include: same-site detection, same optical cable segment detection, same laying segment detection, cross-route detection and adjacent route detection are ranked in descending order of priority.

[0038] In this embodiment, the preset priorities are the same-site detection, the same optical cable segment detection, the same laying segment detection, the cross-route detection and the adjacent route detection, which are ranked in order from high to low. Among them, the same site is the highest priority, because the same-site failure may cause multiple routes to be interrupted at the same time; the same optical cable segment is the second highest priority, which may affect a large range of communications; the same laying segment is the medium priority, and its impact range is usually smaller than the same optical cable segment; the cross-route is a lower priority, and the potential risk is relatively small; the adjacent route is the lowest priority, and usually does not affect multiple routes at the same time. The present invention adopts this priority sorting order because it takes into account the impact range of the same route hidden dangers, and gives priority to detecting and handling hidden dangers with a large impact range to reduce losses and improve the pertinence and effectiveness of detection.

[0039] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, based on the detection priority, the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is performed to obtain fault information, including: if the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is a same-site detection, based on two pre-detected relay segments, obtaining the first optical exchange site set and the second optical exchange site set; judging whether the first optical exchange site set and the second optical exchange site set have the same site, if the first optical exchange site set and the second optical exchange site set have the same site, then determining that the same-site situation exists, otherwise, continuing the same-route hidden danger detection analysis according to the detection priority.

[0040] In this embodiment, if the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is the same-site detection, the first optical cross-site set and the second optical cross-site set are obtained according to the two pre-detected relay segments, the first optical cross-site set and the second optical cross-site set respectively cover all the optical cross-sites of the two pre-detected relay segments, and it is judged whether the first optical cross-site set and the second optical cross-site set have the same site. If the same site exists, it is determined that there is a same site situation, otherwise, the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is continued according to the detection priority. The same-site detection is performed according to the above method, which improves the accuracy and effectiveness of the detection work.

[0041] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, based on the detection priority, the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis is performed to obtain fault information, which also includes: if the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis is a same-optical cable segment detection, based on two pre-detected relay segments, obtaining a first relay segment coordinate set and a second relay segment coordinate set; determining whether the first relay segment coordinate set and the second relay segment coordinate set have the same coordinates, if the first relay segment coordinate set and the second relay segment coordinate set have the same coordinates, determining the same optical cable segment situation, otherwise, continuing the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis according to the detection priority.

[0042] In this embodiment, if the same route hidden danger detection analysis is the same optical cable segment detection, based on the two pre-detected relay segments, the first relay segment coordinate set and the second relay segment coordinate set are obtained, wherein the first relay segment coordinate set and the second relay segment coordinate set contain the coordinates of any position of the two pre-detected relay segments. Then, it is determined whether the first relay segment coordinate set and the second relay segment coordinate set have the same coordinates. If the first relay segment coordinate set and the second relay segment coordinate set have the same coordinates, the same optical cable segment situation is determined. In this way, the same optical cable segment detection is accurately realized, which helps to quickly locate and solve optical cable faults and improve the efficiency of optical cable maintenance.

[0043] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, based on the detection priority, the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is performed to obtain fault information, which also includes: if the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is a same-laying section detection, based on two pre-detected relay sections, obtaining the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set; judging whether the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set have the same bearer facility number; if the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set have the same number, it is determined that the same laying section exists; otherwise, continuing the same-route hidden danger detection analysis according to the detection priority.

[0044] In this embodiment, if the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is the same-laying section detection, based on two pre-detected relay sections, the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set are obtained, wherein the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set respectively include any bearer facilities of the two pre-detected relay sections, wherein the bearer facilities are represented by numbers, and then it is determined whether the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set have the same bearer facility number. If the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set have the same number, it is determined that there is a same-laying section, otherwise, the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is continued according to the detection priority. The same-laying section detection is performed by the above scheme, which greatly improves the detection efficiency and accuracy.

[0045] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, based on the detection priority, the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis is performed to obtain fault information, which also includes: if the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis is an adjacent route detection, based on the longitude and latitude of the two pre-detected relay segments, obtaining the vector information of the two relay segments; based on the vector information, judging whether the angle between the two pre-detected relay segments exceeds 90°; if the angle exceeds 90°, judging that there is an adjacent route, performing an adjacent route analysis on the two pre-detected relay segments; otherwise, continuing the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis according to the detection priority.

[0046] In this embodiment, if the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is a nearby route detection, the present invention first obtains the vector information of the two relay segments based on the longitude and latitude of the two pre-detected relay segments. Among them, the vector information of the optical cable segment, the X value is obtained by subtracting the latitude of the starting point from the latitude of the end point, and the Y value is obtained by subtracting the longitude of the starting point from the longitude of the end point. According to the vector information, the line segment lengths of the two pre-detected relay segments can be obtained respectively, and then the dot product of the vectors of the two pre-detected relay segments can be obtained, and the cosine value is calculated by the dot product and the product of the vector length, and then the radian value of the angle is obtained by reverse calculation using the cosine value, and the radian system is converted into an angle value. It can be determined that if the angle of the angle between the two pre-detected relay segments exceeds 90°, it means that there is a nearby route, and on this basis, the two pre-detected relay segments continue to be analyzed for nearby routes, otherwise, the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is continued according to the detection priority. By calculating the vector angle of the two relay segments, the relative position relationship between them can be accurately determined, thereby determining whether there is a nearby route. This method does not require complex spatial distance calculations or graphic matching, thereby improving detection efficiency.

[0047] Further, in some embodiments of the present invention, based on the detection priority, the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is performed to obtain fault information, which also includes: if the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is a cross-route detection, based on the longitude and latitude of two pre-detected relay segments, the vector information of the two relay segments, the difference in longitude at the starting point of the two relay segments, the difference in latitude at the starting point of the two relay segments, the longitude difference at the end point of the two relay segments, and the latitude difference at the end point of the two relay segments are obtained; based on the vector information, the difference in longitude and latitude of the starting point and the difference in longitude and latitude of the end point, it is determined whether there is an intersection; if there is an intersection, it is determined that there is a cross-route; otherwise, the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is continued according to the detection priority.

[0048] In this embodiment, if the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is cross-route detection, based on the longitude and latitude of two pre-detected relay segments, the vector information of the two relay segments, the difference in longitude of the starting point of the two relay segments, the difference in latitude of the starting point of the two relay segments, the difference in longitude of the end point of the two relay segments, and the difference in latitude of the end point of the two relay segments are obtained. Among them, the X value of the vector information is obtained by subtracting the latitude of the starting point from the latitude of the end point, and the Y value is obtained by subtracting the longitude of the starting point from the longitude of the end point. On this basis, the first parameter and the second parameter are set respectively, wherein the numerator of the first parameter is the cross product of the vector of one of the relay segments and "the difference in longitude of the starting point of the two relay segments as the X value, and the difference in latitude of the starting point of the two relay segments as the Y value", and the denominator of the first parameter is the cross product of the vector information of the two relay segments. The numerator of the second parameter is the cross product of the vector of another relay segment and "the difference in longitude of the hour of the two relay segments as the X value, and the difference in latitude of the end point of the two relay segments as the Y value", and the denominator is the cross product of the vector information of the two relay segments. Then, it is determined whether the first parameter and the second parameter are both greater than zero and less than one. If the first parameter and the second parameter are both greater than zero and less than one, it means that there is an intersection, and it is determined that there is a cross-route. Otherwise, the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis is continued according to the detection priority. By judging the cross-route situation by the above method, the accuracy of detection is improved, and the computing time and resource consumption are significantly reduced.

[0049] For ease of understanding, the following parts are marked with some numbers for ease of understanding. Assume that the vector information of the two relay segments is (X1, Y1) and (X2, Y2), the first parameter is S, the second parameter is T, the difference in longitude at the start of the two relay segments is X3, the difference in latitude at the start of the two relay segments is Y3, the difference in longitude at the end of the two relay segments is X4, and the difference in latitude at the end of the two relay segments is Y4, S is the quotient of the cross product of (X1, Y1) and (X3, Y3) and the cross product of (X1, Y1) and (X2, Y2), and T is the quotient of the cross product of (X2, Y2) and (X4, Y4) and the cross product of (X1, Y1) and (X2, Y2).

[0050] Furthermore, in some embodiments of the present invention, a proximity routing analysis is performed on two pre-detected relay segments, including: dividing one of the pre-detected relay segments into multiple line segments of equal length, and calculating the distance from the line segment to the other pre-detected relay segment respectively; if the distance is less than a threshold, it is determined that a proximity routing exists for the line segment.

[0051] In this embodiment, one of the pre-detected relay segments is divided into multiple line segments of equal length, and the distance from the line segment to another pre-detected relay segment is calculated; if the distance is less than a threshold, it is determined that the line segment has an adjacent route. Under the premise that the existence of an adjacent route is known, the specific location of the adjacent route is determined by this method, which effectively improves the detection efficiency.

[0052] A second aspect of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a program or instruction. When the program or instruction is executed by a processor, a method for troubleshooting optical cable co-routing hazards as in any of the above embodiments is implemented.

[0053] The computer readable storage medium includes a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk.

[0054] A computer-readable storage medium may be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device, and may be an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the above devices, but is not limited thereto. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of computer-readable storage media includes: portable computer floppy disks, hard disks, random access memories, read-only memories, erasable programmable read-only memories, static random access memories, portable compact disk read-only memories, digital versatile disks, memory cards, floppy disks, encoding mechanical devices (such as punched cards or grooves with raised structures having instructions recorded therein), and any suitable combination of the above devices. The computer-readable storage medium used herein should not be understood as a transmission signal itself, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through waveguides or other transmission media, or electrical signals transmitted through wires, etc.

[0055] In the claims, specification and drawings of the present invention, the term "multiple" refers to two or more than two. Unless otherwise clearly defined, the orientation or positional relationship indicated by the terms "upper" and "lower" is based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the drawings, which is only for the purpose of more conveniently describing the present invention and making the description process simpler, rather than indicating or implying that the device or element referred to must have the specific orientation described, be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, so these descriptions cannot be understood as limiting the present invention; the terms "connect", "install", "fix" and the like should be understood in a broad sense. For example, "connection" can be a fixed connection between multiple objects, or a detachable connection between multiple objects, or an integral connection; it can be a direct connection between multiple objects, or an indirect connection between multiple objects through an intermediate medium. For ordinary technicians in this field, the specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood based on the specific circumstances of the above data.

[0056] In the claims, specification and drawings of the present invention, the description of the terms "one embodiment", "some embodiments", "specific embodiments" and the like means that the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiment or example are included in at least one embodiment or example of the present invention. In the claims, specification and drawings of the present invention, the schematic representations of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Moreover, the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described may be combined in any one or more embodiments or examples in a suitable manner.

[0057] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. For those skilled in the art, the present invention may have various modifications and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for troubleshooting hidden dangers of optical cable routing, characterized in that: include: Based on the information of relay segments, a co-routing resource model is established; Based on the pre-detected position, obtaining the pre-detected relay segment in the same routing resource model; Performing a hidden danger risk assessment on the pre-detected relay segment to obtain a detection priority; Based on the detection priority, perform detection and analysis of hidden dangers on the same route to obtain fault information; Performing fault processing based on the fault information; The same-route hidden danger detection and analysis includes same-site detection, same-optical cable section detection, same-laying section detection, cross-route detection and adjacent-route detection.

2. The method for troubleshooting optical cable routing hazards according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of performing a hidden danger risk assessment on the pre-detected relay segment to obtain a detection priority includes: Obtaining a preset detection priority and a priority parameter of the pre-detected relay segment; Based on the priority parameter, adjusting the preset priority to obtain the detection priority; The priority parameters include preset service level, historical failure probability, repair difficulty coefficient and climate parameters.

3. The method for troubleshooting optical cable routing hazards according to claim 2, characterized in that: The preset priorities include: The priorities of the same-site detection, the same-optical cable segment detection, the same-laying segment detection, the cross-route detection and the adjacent route detection are arranged in descending order.

4. The method for troubleshooting optical cable routing hazards according to claim 3, characterized in that: The performing the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis based on the detection priority and obtaining the fault information includes: If the same-route risk detection analysis is the same-site detection, Based on the two pre-detected relay segments, acquiring a first optical cross-point set and a second optical cross-point set; Determine whether the first optical cross-point set and the second optical cross-point set have the same site. If the first optical cross-point set and the second optical cross-point set have the same site, determine that the same site exists. Otherwise, continue to perform the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis according to the detection priority.

5. The method for troubleshooting optical cable routing hazards according to claim 3, characterized in that: The performing the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis based on the detection priority and obtaining the fault information further includes: If the same route hidden danger detection analysis is the same optical cable segment detection, Based on the two pre-detected relay segments, obtaining a first relay segment coordinate set and a second relay segment coordinate set; Determine whether the first relay segment coordinate set and the second relay segment coordinate set have the same coordinates. If the first relay segment coordinate set and the second relay segment coordinate set have the same coordinates, determine that they are the same optical cable segment. Otherwise, continue to perform the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis according to the detection priority.

6. The method for troubleshooting optical cable routing hazards according to claim 3, characterized in that: The performing the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis based on the detection priority and obtaining the fault information further includes: If the same route hidden danger detection analysis is the same laying section detection, Based on the two pre-detected relay segments, obtaining a first bearer facility number set and a second bearer facility number set; Determine whether the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set have the same bearer facility number, if the first bearer facility number set and the second bearer facility number set have the same number, then determine that there is a same laying section, Otherwise, continue to perform the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis according to the detection priority.

7. The method for troubleshooting optical cable routing hazards according to claim 3, characterized in that: The performing the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis based on the detection priority and obtaining the fault information further includes: If the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is the adjacent route detection, Based on the longitude and latitude of the two pre-detected relay segments, obtaining vector information of the two relay segments; Based on the vector information, it is determined whether the angle between the two pre-detected relay segments exceeds 90°; if the angle exceeds 90°, it is determined that there is an adjacent route, and an adjacent route analysis is performed on the two pre-detected relay segments. Otherwise, continue to perform the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis according to the detection priority.

8. The method for troubleshooting optical cable routing hazards according to claim 3, characterized in that: The performing the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis based on the detection priority and obtaining the fault information further includes: If the same-route hidden danger detection analysis is the cross-route detection, Based on the longitude and latitude of the two pre-detected relay segments, obtain vector information of the two relay segments, a difference in longitude of the starting points of the two relay segments, a difference in latitude of the starting points of the two relay segments, a difference in longitude of the ending points of the two relay segments, and a difference in latitude of the ending points of the two relay segments; Based on the vector information, the latitude and longitude difference of the starting point and the latitude and longitude difference of the end point, it is determined whether there is an intersection, and if there is an intersection, it is determined that there is a cross route, Otherwise, continue to perform the same-route hidden danger detection and analysis according to the detection priority.

9. The method for troubleshooting optical cable routing hazards according to claim 1, characterized in that: The performing adjacent routing analysis on the two pre-detected relay segments includes: Dividing one of the pre-detected relay segments into a plurality of line segments of equal length, and respectively calculating the distances from the line segments to another of the pre-detected relay segments; If the distance is less than a threshold, it is determined that there is an adjacent route for the line segment.

10. A computer-readable storage medium storing a program or an instruction, characterized in that: When the program or the instruction is executed by the processor, the method for troubleshooting optical cable co-routing hazards described in any one of claims 1 to 9 is implemented.

Images