Equipment distribution system deployment contrastive analysis system
By designing equipment systems to deploy a comparison and analysis system, integrating multiple calculation methods and optimization algorithms, the problems of long design time and poor applicability of results are solved, the ability to quickly generate multiple deployment solutions is realized, and the efficiency of pre-war planning is improved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202311702270.2
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2023-12-12
- Publication Date
- 2025-03-14
AI Technical Summary
Traditional equipment deployment computing systems have been designed for a long time, and the results are poorly applicable, making it difficult to quickly respond to dynamic and complex battlefield environments, and can only provide results in one calculation method.
Design a system for deploying equipment systems that integrate multiple system systems to deploy computing methods and optimization methods, including traditional methods and intelligent optimization methods, such as genetic algorithms and reinforcement learning algorithms, which can generate multiple deployment solutions and perform comparison and analysis.
Through this system, the system deployment plan for air defense equipment can be quickly and reasonably generated, which improves the efficiency of pre-war planning, and solves the problem of long manual arrangement time, slow response and only one solution is provided.
Smart Images
Figure CN119623227A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The invention relates to an equipment matching deployment comparison and analysis system, belonging to the field of air defense equipment combat planning technology and software technology. Background Art
[0002] The deployment of air defense equipment is an important part of the campaign / tactical air defense combat planning. It mainly determines the type and quantity of air defense equipment that meets the combat mission and gives the deployment position of each equipment. In modern air defense operations, the purpose of air defense weapon deployment is to create a combat situation that is favorable to air defense and unfavorable to air raids under certain combat conditions, so as to form a reasonable firepower structure and detection structure in the battle, occupy a certain advantage, and give full play to the advantages of air defense firepower, curb the power of air raid weapons and achieve the purpose of defending our important places. As an important part of pre-war planning, the reasonable deployment of air defense weapons is particularly important, and an excellent deployment calculation system is also indispensable. The traditional equipment deployment calculation system can only provide the result of a calculation method, and it is repeatedly optimized through large sample simulation. The design time is long, and the applicability of the results is poor, and it is difficult to quickly respond to the dynamic and complex battlefield environment.
[0003] In the complex combat scenarios of the future, in order to effectively support combat, how to quickly and reasonably generate a deployment plan for air defense equipment based on the enemy and friendly situation is one of the key issues that need to be solved in pre-war combat planning. Summary of the invention
[0004] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides an equipment configuration deployment comparison and analysis system, which can integrate a variety of configuration deployment calculation methods and provide a variety of scheme comparison and analysis. While ensuring the rationality and effectiveness of the calculation, it improves the efficiency of pre-war planning for specific air defense combat tasks.
[0005] The present invention is achieved through the following technical solutions.
[0006] The present invention provides an equipment configuration deployment comparison and analysis system, which includes a configuration calculation module, a deployment calculation module, an evaluation index calculation module and a deployment result visualization display module, wherein: The system calculation module completes the weapon types and corresponding quantities required for coordinated combat tasks by designing traditional system calculation methods and intelligent optimization system calculation methods. When using multiple system calculation methods, multiple results can be compared. The system calculation results are displayed in a graphical way and compared with the calculation results of various methods; The deployment calculation module deployment calculation path includes traditional deployment methods and optimization methods, and the deployment calculation is performed by obtaining the system calculation results; Evaluation indicator calculation module, which designs multiple indicators for deployment solution evaluation under different calculation methods; The deployment result visualization display module displays the deployment location points and protectable range on the map according to the deployment area settings, and can realize manual adjustment.
[0007] The graphical methods include bar graphs and straight line graphs.
[0008] The matching calculation method includes blocking type, blocking type and covering type calculation method.
[0009] The equipment for which the matching calculation module performs matching calculations includes interception equipment, early warning detection equipment, and interference equipment.
[0010] The intelligent optimization matching calculation method includes a genetic algorithm and a particle swarm algorithm, and the optimal solution is obtained by designing an objective function and constraint conditions.
[0011] The traditional deployment methods include blocking, blocking and covering calculation methods.
[0012] The optimization method for deploying the computing module adopts a reinforcement learning algorithm.
[0013] The multiple indicators designed by the evaluation indicator calculation module include firepower overlap and firepower coverage area.
[0014] The equipment that the deployment calculation module performs deployment calculation on includes interception equipment, early warning detection equipment, and interference equipment.
[0015] The beneficial effects of the present invention are that it can determine the data input format and content based on the rapid and reasonable generation of air defense equipment deployment plans, solve the problems of long manual allocation time, slow response and only providing one plan, and is conducive to the rapid calculation of pre-war equipment deployment plans. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016] Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a module arrangement of at least one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the target protection interface.
[0017] Figure 3 for Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the interface of the central matching system calculation module.
[0018] Figure 4 for Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the interface for displaying the matching results of the matching calculation module.
[0019] Figure 5 for Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the interface for deploying computing modules to perform deployment area analysis.
[0020] Figure 6 for Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the interface for deploying the calculation module to calculate the deployment plan. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0021] The technical solution of the present invention is further described below, but the scope of protection claimed is not limited to the description.
[0022] Example 1 like Figures 1 to 6 The equipment configuration deployment comparison and analysis system shown in the figure includes a configuration calculation module, a deployment calculation module, an evaluation index calculation module and a deployment result visualization display module, wherein: The system calculation module completes the weapon types and corresponding quantities required for coordinated combat tasks by designing traditional system calculation methods and intelligent optimization system calculation methods. When using multiple system calculation methods, multiple results can be compared. The system calculation results are displayed in a graphical way and compared with the calculation results of various methods; The deployment calculation module deployment calculation path includes traditional deployment methods and optimization methods, and the deployment calculation is performed by obtaining the system calculation results; Evaluation indicator calculation module, which designs multiple indicators for deployment solution evaluation under different calculation methods; The deployment result visualization display module displays the deployment location points and protectable range on the map according to the deployment area settings, and can realize manual adjustment.
[0023] Example 2 Based on Example 1, the graphical methods include bar graphs and straight line graphs.
[0024] Furthermore, the matching calculation method includes blocking, blocking and covering calculation methods.
[0025] Furthermore, the equipment for which the system calculation module performs system calculations includes interception equipment, early warning detection equipment, and interference equipment.
[0026] Furthermore, intelligent optimization matching calculation methods include genetic algorithms and particle swarm algorithms, which obtain the optimal solution by designing objective functions and constraints.
[0027] Furthermore, traditional deployment methods include blocking, blocking, and covering computing methods.
[0028] Furthermore, the optimization method for deploying computing modules adopts reinforcement learning algorithm.
[0029] Furthermore, the evaluation index calculation module is designed with multiple indicators including firepower overlap, firepower coverage area, frontal attack width, number of firepower gaps, etc.
[0030] Furthermore, the equipment deployed and calculated by the deployment calculation module includes interception equipment, early warning detection equipment, and interference equipment.
[0031] Example 3 Based on the above embodiment, the present invention specifically includes: (1) In the system calculation module, the data content and format are first determined. The data content mainly includes the performance parameters of the air defense equipment itself, the target parameters, and the defense area parameters. The data format can be imported in the form of a text document or a table.
[0032] The interception zone calculation formula is used to calculate the interception capability of weapons against different targets at different altitudes, including interception depth, route shortcuts, cover angles, interception far and near boundaries at different altitudes, and other parameters. It includes traditional calculation methods and intelligent optimization methods. The equipment for system calculation includes interception equipment, early warning detection equipment, and interference equipment. The system calculation results can be displayed graphically and compared in a variety of ways.
[0033] Three traditional matching calculation methods, namely, blocking, blocking and covering, and an intelligent optimization matching calculation method are designed for interception equipment. Only one traditional matching calculation method is designed for early warning detection equipment and electronic jamming equipment.
[0034] Intelligent optimization matching calculation can adopt artificial intelligence algorithms such as genetic algorithm and particle swarm algorithm to obtain the optimal solution by designing objective function and constraint conditions.
[0035] In the result display interface, for interception equipment, if multiple configuration calculation methods are used, the results can be compared in the form of a bar chart, line chart or pie chart. The comparison content is the comparison of the quantity required for each type of equipment under different configuration calculation methods. The commander can choose the appropriate plan according to the specific situation.
[0036] (2) The deployment calculation approach includes traditional deployment methods and optimization methods. Deployment calculation is performed by obtaining the system calculation results. The equipment involved includes interception equipment, early warning detection equipment, and interference equipment.
[0037] Before performing deployment calculations, the deployment positions need to be analyzed, and the deployable point set needs to be determined based on constraints such as position height difference, shielding angle, and no water area. The deployable point set is saved and referenced in the deployment calculations.
[0038] Three traditional deployment calculation methods, namely, blocking, blocking and covering, and an intelligent optimization deployment calculation method are designed for intercepting equipment.
[0039] Only one traditional deployment calculation method is designed for early warning detection equipment and electronic jamming equipment.
[0040] The intelligent optimization algorithm can adopt the reinforcement learning algorithm. The reinforcement learning algorithm has global optimization capabilities and fast optimization speed. It can complete equipment deployment calculations efficiently and quickly to avoid falling into local optimality.
[0041] (3) Evaluation indicator calculation module, which designs multiple indicators for deployment solution evaluation under different calculation methods; Multiple indicators such as firepower overlap and firepower coverage area are designed to be used for evaluating deployment plans under different calculation methods.
[0042] (4) The deployment result visualization module displays the deployment location and fire coverage on the map according to the deployment area settings. The deployment display interface can be manually adjusted according to the commander, and the designed evaluation index values can be dynamically displayed.
Claims
1. An equipment deployment comparison and analysis system, characterized by: It includes the system calculation module, deployment calculation module, evaluation index calculation module and deployment result visualization display module, among which: The system calculation module completes the weapon types and corresponding quantities required for coordinated combat tasks by designing traditional system calculation methods and intelligent optimization system calculation methods. When using multiple system calculation methods, multiple results can be compared. The system calculation results are displayed in a graphical way and compared with the calculation results of various methods; The deployment calculation module deployment calculation path includes traditional deployment methods and optimization methods, and the deployment calculation is performed by obtaining the system calculation results; Evaluation indicator calculation module, which designs multiple indicators for deployment solution evaluation under different calculation methods; The deployment result visualization display module displays the deployment location points and protectable range on the map according to the deployment area settings, and can realize manual adjustment.
2. The equipment configuration deployment comparison and analysis system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The graphical methods include bar graphs and straight line graphs.
3. The equipment configuration deployment comparison and analysis system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The matching calculation method includes blocking type, blocking type and covering type calculation method.
4. The equipment configuration deployment comparison and analysis system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The equipment for which the matching calculation module performs matching calculations includes interception equipment, early warning detection equipment, and interference equipment.
5. The equipment configuration deployment comparison and analysis system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The intelligent optimization matching calculation method includes a genetic algorithm and a particle swarm algorithm, and the optimal solution is obtained by designing an objective function and constraint conditions.
6. The equipment configuration deployment comparison and analysis system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The traditional deployment methods include blocking, blocking and covering calculation methods.
7. The equipment configuration deployment comparison and analysis system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The optimization method for deploying the computing module adopts a reinforcement learning algorithm.
8. The equipment configuration deployment comparison and analysis system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The multiple indicators designed by the evaluation indicator calculation module include firepower overlap and firepower coverage area.
9. The equipment configuration deployment comparison and analysis system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The equipment that the deployment calculation module performs deployment calculation on includes interception equipment, early warning detection equipment, and interference equipment.