Aircraft structure auditing and signing process query system

Abstract

The invention belongs to the technical field of process query, and provides an aircraft structure auditing and signing process query system, which comprises a query interface module and a query database module, and is characterized in that the query interface module provides a corresponding auditing and signing process and a corresponding auditing and signing personnel list for a user after receiving an auditing and signing process query condition input by the user; the query interface module comprises option display and query keys for a user to input, the option display and query keys comprise a first option, a second option and a third option, after the user determines specific option items in the first option, the second option and the third option, the query keys can be clicked, and after the user clicks the query keys, the query keys can be clicked. The query interface module sends a query instruction with option information to the query database module; the query database module comprises auditing and signing processes of all combination options and auditing and signing personnel list data, receives a query instruction, calls out the corresponding auditing and signing processes and auditing and signing personnel list data according to option information and sends the auditing and signing processes and the auditing and signing personnel list data to the query interface module; and the query interface module displays the auditing and signing process and the auditing and signing personnel list to the user. According to the method, based on an aircraft model, personnel in each department of the structure can query information of each flow related role auditing and signing personnel by one key according to a flow type, a change refining category and a system to which the flow belongs, so that a structure research and development designer can conveniently perform flow auditing and signing personnel selection; and the influence on aircraft production and research and development progress caused by process rejection and change due to simple wrong selection or missed selection of process-related role auditing and signing personnel is avoided, and the time cost is saved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of process query, relates to a process reviewer query tool, and specifically relates to an aircraft structure review process query system. Background Art

[0002] The factory-in-one unit integrates production and R&D. Production has various types of workshops such as CNC, machining, subassembly, and final assembly. R&D has a design institute. R&D guides production, and production feeds back problems to R&D to improve and perfect R&D. The two work together and promote each other. Among them, the technical problem handling form, design change suggestion, and change form / technical form as the three major change documents play an important bridging role between production and R&D. Correspondingly, in order to connect production and R&D and open up the change document review process, the EPDM system must be involved, and the internal R&D process involves the VPM system.

[0003] As the skeleton of the aircraft, the structural department undertakes the structural plan, detailed design and drawing work of the aircraft during R&D, and undertakes the production of parts, sub-assembly, and final assembly of the workshop, etc., and cooperates with each workshop to complete the production, flight test, maintenance and repair of the aircraft. Due to the different systems of aircraft models, structural professional departments, detailed change categories and processes, on the one hand, the internal reviewers of R&D related roles such as proofreading, strength, weight, review, and approval are different, and external reviewers of downstream supporting roles such as process, standard review, production, and file archiving are different. Therefore, when the structural R&D designers submit the three types of change document processes, they are prone to selecting the wrong reviewer or missing the reviewer, resulting in the rejection of the process change. Such rejection of the process due to non-technical issues not only affects the progress of the process, but also affects the progress of aircraft R&D and production.

[0004] Patent CN108431806B relates to an auxiliary search query, which solves the problem that users must spend a lot of time learning to use complex search tools and collect and organize previous successful queries as much as possible for future use. Patent CN115203229A relates to a process query system and method, which aims to solve the technical problem of low efficiency of process query in the prior art. The above patent is limited to the use scenario and function and is not suitable for aircraft structure R&D designers to use for related role reviewers to query when submitting three types of change document processes. Summary of the invention

[0005] In order to solve the above problems, the present invention provides an aircraft structure review process query system, which enables structural R&D and design personnel to directly determine the corresponding reviewers when selecting reviewers of different roles for three types of change document processes, thereby improving the efficiency of process completion and thus improving the efficiency of R&D and production work.

[0006] The technical solution of the present invention is as follows:

[0007] A system for querying the review process of an aircraft structure comprises a query interface module and a query database module. After receiving the review process query conditions input by a user, the query interface module provides the user with the corresponding review process and a list of corresponding reviewers; the query interface module comprises an option display for user input and a query button, including a first option, a second option and a third option. The query button can be clicked only after the user determines a specific option item among the first option, the second option and the third option. After the user clicks the query button, the query interface module sends a query instruction with option information to the query database module; the query database module includes the review process and the list of reviewers data of all combined options. The query database module receives the query instruction, and according to the option information, calls out the corresponding review process and the list of reviewers data and sends them to the query interface module. The query interface module displays the review process and the list of reviewers to the user.

[0008] Furthermore, the first option is an aircraft model option, the second option is a department option, and the third option is a process type option.

[0009] Furthermore, in the aircraft model option, the user selects the abbreviation corresponding to the corresponding aircraft model.

[0010] Furthermore, in the department option, the user selects a corresponding department, and the department is divided according to specific units of the aircraft structure.

[0011] Furthermore, in the process type option, the user selects the corresponding technical process, including technical problem handling process, change order / technical order process, and design change suggestion process.

[0012] Furthermore, the query interface module also includes sub-options. After the user selects the design change suggestion process option, the query interface module displays the sub-options. The query button can only be clicked after the user selects the sub-option; the sub-options include category options and system options. The category options are classified according to the nature of the changes and the impact on the work-in-progress. The system options are the selection of the process system. The process system includes the VPM system and the EPDM system.

[0013] Furthermore, when the query interface module displays the review process and the list of reviewers, they are displayed in order according to the review items in the review process, and the corresponding reviewer information is displayed next to the corresponding review item.

[0014] Furthermore, it also includes a query update module, through which the administrator modifies the data in the query database module; the query update module includes a review process change sub-module and a reviewer change sub-module, in which the administrator can add and delete specific review items in the review process corresponding to different option combinations, and enter the reviewer information corresponding to the added review items; in the reviewer change sub-module, the administrator can check the review process corresponding to different option combinations, and modify the reviewer information corresponding to the specific review items in the review process.

[0015] The beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows:

[0016] The present invention is based on the aircraft model. Personnel from various structural departments can query the information of reviewers of relevant roles of each process with one click according to the process type, change detailed category and the system to which the process belongs, so as to facilitate the structural R&D and design personnel to select process reviewers, avoid the rejection of process changes due to simple wrong selection or omission of process-related role reviewers, affect the progress of aircraft production and R&D, and save time costs. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0017] Figure 1 It is the reviewer selection query tool architecture of the present invention;

[0018] Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of aircraft model options according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0019] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of department options in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0020] Figure 4 It is a modified refinement category of the embodiment of the present invention;

[0021] Figure 5 Is the person who reviews the technical problem handling form and design change suggestion process of the embodiment of the present invention;

[0022] Figure 6 A reviewer of the change order / technical order process of the embodiment of the present invention;

[0023] Figure 7 It is a process review icon of an embodiment of the present invention;

[0024] Figure 8 This is the process reviewer selection query tool interface of the embodiment of the present invention;

[0025] Fig. 9 This is an example of a reviewer for a technical problem handling process in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0026] Fig.10 This is an example of a reviewer for the design change suggestion process in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0027] Fig.11 This is an example of a reviewer for a VPM system for a type 2(1) change order / technical order according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0028] Fig.12 This is an example of a reviewer for the EPDM system for type 2(2) change orders / technical orders in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0029] This section is an embodiment of the present invention, which is used to explain and illustrate the technical solution of the present invention. In the absence of conflict, the embodiments of the present invention and the features in the embodiments can be combined with each other.

[0030] In the description of the present invention, it should be understood that the terms "center", "longitudinal", "lateral", "up", "down", "front", "back", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "top", "bottom", "inside", "outside" and the like indicate directions or positional relationships based on the orientations or positional relationships in the accompanying drawings, and are only for the convenience of describing the present invention and simplifying the description, rather than indicating or implying that the device or case referred to must have a specific orientation, be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, and therefore cannot be understood as limiting the present invention. In addition, the terms "first", "second", etc. are used for descriptive purposes only, and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance or implying the number of technical features indicated. Thus, features defined as "first", "second", etc. may explicitly or implicitly include more of the features. In the description of the present invention, unless otherwise specified, "multiple" means two or more.

[0031] In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that, unless otherwise clearly specified and limited, the terms "installed", "connected" and "connected" should be interpreted in a broad sense, for example, it can be a fixed connection, a detachable connection or an integrated connection; it can be a mechanical connection or a point connection; it can be a direct connection or an indirect connection through an intermediate medium, or it can be the internal communication of two components. For ordinary technicians in this field, the specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood by specific circumstances.

[0032] Embodiment 1:

[0033] A system for querying the review process of an aircraft structure comprises a query interface module and a query database module. After receiving the review process query conditions input by a user, the query interface module provides the user with the corresponding review process and a list of corresponding reviewers; the query interface module comprises an option display for user input and a query button, including a first option, a second option and a third option. The query button can be clicked only after the user determines a specific option item among the first option, the second option and the third option. After the user clicks the query button, the query interface module sends a query instruction with option information to the query database module; the query database module includes the review process and the list of reviewers data of all combined options. The query database module receives the query instruction, and according to the option information, calls out the corresponding review process and the list of reviewers data and sends them to the query interface module. The query interface module displays the review process and the list of reviewers to the user.

[0034] The first option is the aircraft model option, the second option is the department option, and the third option is the process type option.

[0035] In the aircraft model option, the user selects the abbreviation corresponding to the corresponding aircraft model.

[0036] In the department option, the user selects the corresponding department, which is divided into specific units of the aircraft structure.

[0037] In the process type option, the user selects the corresponding technical process, including technical problem handling process, change order / technical order process, and design change suggestion process.

[0038] The query interface module also includes sub-options. After the user selects the design change suggestion process option, the query interface module displays the sub-options. The query button can only be clicked after the user selects the sub-option. The sub-options include category options and system options. Category options are classified according to the nature of the change and the impact on the work-in-progress. System options are the selection of process systems. The process systems include VPM systems and EPDM systems.

[0039] When the query interface module displays the review process and the list of reviewers, it displays them in order according to the review items in the review process, and displays the corresponding reviewer information on the right side of the corresponding review item, including the person's name, work number, internal telephone number, position, etc. The reviewer list data can be linked to the human resources management database in the query database module, thereby facilitating the retrieval of corresponding information.

[0040] It also includes a query update module, through which the administrator can modify the data in the query database module; the query update module includes a review process change sub-module and a reviewer change sub-module. In the review process change sub-module, the administrator can add and delete specific review items in the review process corresponding to different option combinations, and enter the reviewer information corresponding to the added review items; in the reviewer change sub-module, the administrator can check the review process corresponding to different option combinations, and modify the reviewer information corresponding to specific review items in the review process.

[0041] Embodiment 2:

[0042] The aircraft structure process reviewer selection query tool architecture of the present invention is as follows Figure 1 As shown, its query interface is as follows Figure 8 As shown in the figure, it consists of an aircraft model drop-down list, a department drop-down list, a process type selection, a reviewer text box and a query button. Figure 2 As shown, the department composition is as follows Figure 3 As shown in the figure, the process type selection includes technical problem handling form, design change suggestion, change form / technical form, and the change form / technical form involves the change detailed category drop-down list and the system (VPM, EPDM) drop-down list, such as Figure 4 As shown in the figure, the reviewers of the three types of change document processes are as follows: Figure 5-6 As shown, it includes review, verification, bid review, process, approval, etc.

[0043] In the embodiment of the present invention,

[0044] Figure 2 In the code, the aircraft models are composed of KL1, L1, 18, 23, 24, and 25.

[0045] Figure 3 In the middle, the department consists of the front fuselage room, middle fuselage room, rear fuselage room, wing room, tail room and landing gear room.

[0046] Figure 4 In the , the change categories are divided into five categories according to the nature of the change and the impact on the work in progress: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Category 2 includes 2(1) and 2(2). Based on the different review roles, the five categories are reclassified into two major groups: ≤2(1) and ≥2(2). Category ≤2(1) includes 1 and 2(1), and category ≥2(2) includes 2(2), 3, 4, and 5.

[0047] Figure 5 In the process, the reviewers of technical problem handling forms are composed of review, verification, counter-signing, inspection, approval, and problem determination personnel; the reviewers of design change proposals are composed of review, verification, and approval personnel.

[0048] Figure 6 In the change order / technical order review, the change order / technical order reviewers are composed of people with different roles according to the change classification (≤2(1) category and ≥2(2) category) and system process (VPM system (process system within the institute) and EPDM system (process system for production)). The VPM system process includes proofreading, review, strength, weight, counter-signature, review, standard review, process, approval, and quality control personnel; the EPDM system process includes proofreading, review, review, standard review, process, production, approval, quality control / quality control pre-review, filing, overall control, strength and other personnel.

[0049] Double-click or right-click on the computer desktop to open the process reviewer selection query tool icon, such as Figure 7 As shown in the figure, enter the process reviewer selection query interface, such as Figure 8 Select an aircraft model in the Aircraft Model drop-down list, then select a department in the Department drop-down list, and select Change File Type in the Process Type as needed.

[0050] If it is a technical problem handling form, click the Technical Problem Handling Form radio button, then click the Query button, and the Technical Problem Handling Form process reviewer will appear, as shown in the example below. Fig. 9 As shown;

[0051] If it is a design change suggestion, click the Design Change Suggestion radio button, then click the Query button, and the design change suggestion reviewers will appear, such as Fig.10 As shown;

[0052] If it is a change order / technical order, click the Change Order / Technical Order radio button. The Category and System drop-down list boxes pop up. Select ≤2(1) or ≥2(2) according to the category, then select VPM System or EPDM System. Then click the Query button. The Change Order / Technical Order Reviewer will appear. An example of a 2(1) Change Order / Technical Order VPM System Reviewer is as follows: Fig.11 As shown, the example of EPDM system reviewer for type 2(2) change order / technical order is as follows: Fig.12 shown.

[0053] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, but the protection scope of the present invention is not limited thereto. Any technician familiar with the field can easily think of various equivalent modifications or substitutions within the technical scope disclosed by the present invention, and these modifications or substitutions should all be covered within the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. An aircraft structure review process query system, characterized in that: It includes a query interface module and a query database module. After receiving the review process query conditions input by the user, the query interface module provides the user with the corresponding review process and the corresponding reviewer list; the query interface module includes an option display for user input and a query button, including a first option, a second option and a third option. The user can click the query button only after determining the specific option item in the first option, the second option and the third option. After the user clicks the query button, the query interface module sends a query instruction with option information to the query database module; the query database module includes the review process and reviewer list data of all combined options. The query database module receives the query instruction, and calls out the corresponding review process and reviewer list data according to the option information and sends them to the query interface module. The query interface module displays the review process and the reviewer list to the user.

2. The aircraft structure review process query system according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The first option is the aircraft model option, the second option is the department option, and the third option is the process type option.

3. The aircraft structure review process query system according to claim 2 is characterized in that: In the aircraft model option, the user selects the abbreviation corresponding to the corresponding aircraft model.

4. The aircraft structure review process query system according to claim 2 is characterized in that: In the department option, the user selects the corresponding department, which is divided into specific units of the aircraft structure.

5. The aircraft structure review process query system according to claim 2 is characterized in that: In the process type option, the user selects the corresponding technical process, including technical problem handling process, change order / technical order process, and design change suggestion process.

6. The aircraft structure review process query system according to claim 5 is characterized in that: The query interface module also includes sub-options. After the user selects the design change suggestion process option, the query interface module displays the sub-options. The query button can only be clicked after the user selects the sub-option. The sub-options include category options and system options. Category options are classified according to the nature of the change and the impact on the work-in-progress. System options are the selection of process systems. The process systems include VPM systems and EPDM systems.

7. The aircraft structure review process query system according to claim 1 is characterized in that: When the query interface module displays the review process and the list of reviewers, it displays them in order according to the review items in the review process, and displays the corresponding reviewer information next to the corresponding review item.

8. The aircraft structure review process query system according to claim 1 is characterized in that: It also includes a query update module, through which the administrator can modify the data in the query database module; the query update module includes a review process change sub-module and a reviewer change sub-module. In the review process change sub-module, the administrator can add and delete specific review items in the review process corresponding to different option combinations, and enter the reviewer information corresponding to the added review items; in the reviewer change sub-module, the administrator can check the review process corresponding to different option combinations, and modify the reviewer information corresponding to specific review items in the review process.

Images