A method and system for evaluating special rectification of safety problems of power enterprise engineering projects

Abstract

A method and system for assessing safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects, relating to the field of data processing technology, are disclosed. The method includes: acquiring historical operation information of multiple engineering projects within the power enterprise to be assessed; identifying high-frequency violation projects based on the number of unlicensed operations in each historical operation information; receiving current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation projects, and conducting a safety assessment of the construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data according to preset safety operation indicators to identify safety issues requiring rectification within the high-frequency violation projects; identifying the power equipment associated with the safety issues requiring rectification; and generating an assessment report for the high-frequency violation projects by combining the information of the responsible persons for the safety issues requiring rectification and the power equipment. Implementing the technical solution provided in this application improves the efficiency of the assessment of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of data processing technology, specifically to an assessment method, system, electronic device, and storage medium for the special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects. Background Technology

[0002] With the rapid development of my country's power industry, the number and scale of power enterprise engineering projects are constantly expanding. In this process, ensuring the safety of these projects has become a top priority for power enterprise management. Project safety not only affects the economic benefits of enterprises but also directly impacts the stable operation of the power system and the safety of life and property for the general public.

[0003] Currently, existing assessment methods for special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects rely on conducting regular safety assessments of all engineering projects within the power enterprise. However, in practice, due to the large number of engineering projects in power enterprises, conducting regular safety assessments of all projects would consume a significant amount of assessment time and would often make it difficult to conduct targeted assessments of projects with a high incidence of violations, resulting in low efficiency in the special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This application provides a method, system, electronic device, and storage medium for evaluating the special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects, which can improve the efficiency of the evaluation of the special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects.

[0005] Firstly, this application provides an assessment method for the special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects, including:

[0006] Obtain historical operational information for multiple engineering projects within the power company to be evaluated;

[0007] Based on the number of unlicensed operations in each of the aforementioned historical operation information, high-frequency violation items are identified;

[0008] Receive the current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation project, and conduct a safety assessment of the construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data according to the preset safety operation indicators to determine the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency violation project;

[0009] Identify the electrical equipment associated with the safety issues requiring rectification;

[0010] An assessment report for the high-frequency violation projects is generated by combining the safety issues to be rectified and the information of the responsible persons for the power equipment.

[0011] A second aspect of this application provides an assessment system for the special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects, the system comprising:

[0012] The information acquisition module is used to acquire historical operational information of multiple engineering projects in the power company to be evaluated;

[0013] The project identification module is used to identify high-frequency violation projects based on the number of unlicensed operations in each of the historical operation information.

[0014] The safety issue identification module is used to receive the current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation project, and to conduct a safety assessment of the construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data according to preset safety operation indicators to identify the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency violation project.

[0015] The safety assessment module is used to identify the power equipment associated with the safety issues to be rectified; and to generate an assessment report for the high-frequency violation projects by combining the information of the person in charge of the safety issues to be rectified and the power equipment.

[0016] A third aspect of this application provides an electronic device, including a memory, a processor, and a program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, which, when loaded and executed by the processor, implements an assessment method for special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects.

[0017] In a fourth aspect, this application provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to implement an assessment method for special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects.

[0018] In summary, one or more technical solutions provided in the embodiments of this application have at least the following technical effects or advantages:

[0019] By adopting the above technical solutions, historical operational information is obtained, high-frequency violation projects are identified, and more targeted assessments of problems are achieved. By receiving real-time construction and operation and maintenance data of projects, assessments are conducted based on preset safety operation indicators, making the results more accurate and objective. The associated power equipment and responsible persons are identified, establishing a correspondence between problems and equipment / personnel. Finally, a special assessment report for high-frequency violation projects is generated, providing a basis for subsequent rectification. The use of preset safety operation indicators improves the standardization of the assessment. Establishing the correspondence between safety issues to be rectified and power equipment and responsible persons makes the assessment more comprehensive. The resulting assessment report reflects existing problems and provides a reference for rectification suggestions. The overall adoption of a special assessment method targeting high-frequency violation projects makes rectification more targeted, avoiding the time-consuming process of repeatedly assessing all engineering projects, thereby improving the efficiency of special rectification assessments of safety issues in power company engineering projects. Attached Figure Description

[0020] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating an assessment method for the special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects, provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0021] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a special assessment system for safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects provided in an embodiment of this application;

[0022] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0023] Explanation of reference numerals in the attached drawings: 300, electronic device; 301, processor; 302, communication bus; 303, user interface; 304, network interface; 305, memory. Detailed Implementation

[0024] To enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in this specification, the technical solutions in the embodiments of this specification will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this application, and not all embodiments.

[0025] In the description of the embodiments of this application, the words "for example" or "for instance" are used to indicate examples, illustrations, or explanations. Any embodiment or design that is described as "for example" or "for instance" in the embodiments of this application should not be construed as being more preferred or advantageous than other embodiments or design options. Rather, the use of the words "for example" or "for instance" is intended to present the relevant concepts in a specific manner.

[0026] In the description of the embodiments of this application, the term "multiple" means two or more. For example, multiple systems means two or more systems, and multiple screen terminals means two or more screen terminals. Furthermore, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the indicated technical features. Thus, a feature defined with "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of that feature. The terms "comprising," "including," "having," and variations thereof all mean "including but not limited to," unless otherwise specifically emphasized.

[0027] This application provides an assessment method for the special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects. In one embodiment, please refer to... Figure 1 , Figure 1This is a flowchart illustrating the assessment method for the special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects provided in this application embodiment. This method can be implemented using a computer program, which can be integrated into an application or run as a standalone tool application. The method can also be implemented using a microcontroller or run on a power enterprise engineering project safety issue special rectification assessment system based on the von Neumann architecture. Specifically, the method may include the following steps:

[0028] Step 101: Obtain historical operation information for multiple engineering projects in the power company to be evaluated.

[0029] Historical work information refers to relevant data on the operational activities of various engineering projects of a power company within a certain period of time. In the embodiments of this application, historical work information can be understood as work tickets for each project within the most recent year, including operation tickets, work tickets, etc.

[0030] Specifically, to improve the targeting and accuracy of special rectification campaigns targeting safety issues in power company engineering projects, it is necessary to obtain historical operational information for each project before the assessment to identify weaknesses in safety management. This can be achieved by extracting work permit information uploaded by each project department through the company's information management system, including operation tickets, work permits, and accident statistics tables. These work permits record information such as the time, location, participating personnel, work content, and approval status of each operation. Among these, unlicensed operations are a significant safety risk indicator. After obtaining this historical operational information, the number of unlicensed operations for each project can be counted to determine the frequency of violations. Projects with an excessively high number of unlicensed operations indicate significant safety management problems and are considered high-risk projects, thus requiring priority assessment. This method of obtaining historical operational information can quickly pinpoint high-risk projects that power companies are focusing on, thereby improving the accuracy and effectiveness of subsequent safety assessments, concentrating assessment resources on key projects, and providing a basis for identifying and rectifying safety vulnerabilities in projects.

[0031] Step 102: Based on the number of unlicensed operations in each historical operation information, identify high-frequency violation items.

[0032] The term "number of unlicensed operations" refers to the total number of times that various project departments have conducted unauthorized operations without operation permits or work permits, as recorded in historical operation information. In the embodiments of this application, the number of unlicensed operations can be understood as the statistical number of operation activities without work permits conducted by each project within the past year.

[0033] High-frequency violation projects refer to engineering projects that, in the statistical analysis of historical work information, have a high number of unlicensed operations and serious violations of safe operating procedures. In the embodiments of this application, high-frequency violation projects can be understood as those projects where the number of unlicensed operations exceeds a preset threshold. This indicates that these projects frequently violate operating procedures in daily operations, posing significant safety hazards.

[0034] Specifically, to improve the efficiency of limited safety management resources in power companies, it is necessary to prioritize the identification of high-risk engineering projects that most require rectification. This goal can be effectively achieved by analyzing the number of unlicensed operations. Unlicensed operations directly reflect the safety management level of a project and the safety awareness of its personnel; the more instances, the more serious the problem. First, the total number of unlicensed operations for each project is statistically analyzed to calculate the average number of unlicensed operations. Then, based on the company's risk control requirements, a standard threshold for the number of unlicensed operations is set, which can be obtained by multiplying the average number by a preset coefficient. Finally, the actual number of unlicensed operations for each project is compared with this threshold. Projects with a number of operations greater than or equal to the threshold are identified as high-frequency violation projects. Using this quantitative method based on the number of unlicensed operations allows for more accurate identification of high-frequency violation projects, relying on data to reduce subjective influence. These high-frequency violation projects will be the focus of rectification efforts, undergoing targeted safety inspections and detailed rectification measures to quickly eliminate safety hazards. This allows for the concentration of resources and improved rectification efficiency.

[0035] Based on the above embodiments, as an optional embodiment, step 102: determining high-frequency violation items based on the number of unlicensed operations in each historical operation information may further include the following steps:

[0036] Step 201: Based on the number of unlicensed operations, calculate the average number of unlicensed operations for each project; multiply the average number of unlicensed operations by a preset coefficient to obtain the threshold number of unlicensed operations.

[0037] The preset coefficient refers to a value used to amplify the average number of unlicensed operations when calculating the threshold for unlicensed operations. In the embodiments of this application, the preset coefficient can be understood as a constant multiple, such as 1.5 times or 2 times, predetermined by the enterprise based on its own safety management requirements. The purpose of setting this preset coefficient is to increase the strictness of the final judgment threshold by amplifying the average number of unlicensed operations, thereby prompting enterprises to further strengthen safety management and reduce the risk of unlicensed operations.

[0038] The threshold for the number of unlicensed operations refers to the threshold standard for determining whether an engineering project belongs to the category of high-frequency non-compliant projects. In the embodiments of this application, the threshold for the number of unlicensed operations can be understood as a standard for judging the number of unlicensed operations obtained by multiplying the average number of unlicensed operations by a preset coefficient.

[0039] Specifically, to identify high-frequency violations, a threshold threshold needs to be established that combines industry averages with a company's risk tolerance to determine the number of unlicensed operations. First, the total number of unlicensed operations for all projects is statistically analyzed to calculate the average number of unlicensed operations, reflecting the industry average. Then, based on their own risk management capabilities, companies pre-set an amplification factor (preset coefficient), which is multiplied by the average number of unlicensed operations to obtain the final threshold. Projects with more than this threshold are clearly identified as high-risk projects and prioritized for safety hazard rectification. This threshold-setting method ensures the identification of the largest number of high-frequency violations for concentrated rectification.

[0040] Step 202: Compare the number of unlicensed operations for each project with the threshold number of unlicensed operations; if the number of unlicensed operations for a project is greater than or equal to the threshold number of unlicensed operations, then the project is identified as a high-frequency violation project.

[0041] Specifically, after determining the threshold for unlicensed work operations, each project needs to be assessed according to a unified standard to identify high-frequency violations. The total number of unlicensed operations for each project department is compared one by one with the pre-defined threshold. If the number of unlicensed operations for a project is greater than or equal to the threshold, the project is directly identified as a high-frequency violation project with excessive unlicensed operations. Using this comparison method with standard thresholds ensures consistency in the judgment criteria for high-risk projects, reducing the influence of subjective factors. Identifying projects with serious unlicensed operations allows subsequent safety rectification efforts to focus resources on these key projects, quickly eliminating hidden dangers and encouraging project departments to prioritize safety management and reduce unauthorized unlicensed work operations.

[0042] Step 103: Receive the current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of high-frequency non-compliant projects, and conduct a safety assessment of the construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data according to the preset safety operation indicators to identify the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency non-compliant projects.

[0043] Construction data refers to data reflecting safety information during the construction process of an engineering project. In the embodiments of this application, construction data can be understood as data such as the qualification information of project construction personnel and the implementation status of various safety protection measures.

[0044] Equipment operation and maintenance data refers to relevant data reflecting the operation and maintenance status of equipment in an engineering project. In the embodiments of this application, equipment operation and maintenance data can be understood as data such as equipment operating parameters, maintenance records, and inspection reports. The purpose of obtaining equipment operation and maintenance data is to assess whether the project equipment is being operated and maintained in a standardized manner, detect potential safety hazards during the equipment operation and maintenance process, and identify problems that need to be rectified.

[0045] Safety issues requiring rectification refer to problems that do not meet safety standards, detected through analysis of construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of engineering projects. In the embodiments of this application, safety issues requiring rectification can be understood as construction and equipment operation and maintenance issues that are found to fail to meet preset safety operation indicators. The purpose of identifying these safety issues requiring rectification is to find existing safety hazards and improvement points in the project, so as to carry out targeted rectification of safety hazards.

[0046] Specifically, after identifying frequently violated regulations, it's necessary to pinpoint the specific safety hazards present in these projects to facilitate targeted rectification. This requires obtaining current construction and equipment maintenance data, as this data reflects the project's real-time safety status. Next, based on pre-set safety operation standards set by the company, such as operator qualification certificates and equipment inspection reports, these standards are compared and analyzed with the actual project data to determine if any non-compliance exists. Once non-compliance is found, such as equipment not being maintained for an extended period or construction personnel lacking the necessary operating qualifications, it is identified as a safety hazard requiring rectification.

[0047] Based on the above embodiments, as an optional embodiment, step 103, which involves conducting a safety assessment of the construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data according to preset safety operation indicators to identify safety issues to be rectified in high-frequency violation projects, may further include the following steps:

[0048] Step 301: Determine the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications based on the qualification data of construction personnel, and determine the implementation rate of safety protection measures based on the implementation data of safety protection measures.

[0049] The construction personnel qualification data refers to relevant data reflecting the professional qualifications of the project's construction personnel. In the embodiments of this application, construction personnel qualification data can be understood as data such as the operating qualification certificates and professional registration information held by the construction personnel. The purpose of obtaining construction personnel qualification data is to assess whether the project's construction personnel meet the qualification requirements and whether there are any potential safety risks.

[0050] The personnel qualification compliance rate refers to the proportion of construction workers holding relevant professional qualification certificates to the total number of construction workers during the construction of an engineering project. In the embodiments of this application, the personnel qualification compliance rate can be understood as the ratio of the number of construction workers with professional operating qualifications to the total number of workers within a certain project or time period.

[0051] Safety protection measure implementation data refers to data reflecting the implementation status of various safety protection measures during the construction process of an engineering project. In the embodiments of this application, safety protection measure implementation data can be understood as data such as guardrail installation records and hot work safety inspection reports.

[0052] The safety protection measure implementation rate refers to the ratio of the number of safety protection measures implemented during the construction of an engineering project to the total number planned. In the embodiments of this application, the safety protection measure implementation rate can be understood as the ratio of the number of implemented safety protection measures to the total number of protection measures for a certain project or time period.

[0053] Specifically, to make the assessment of project construction safety more convincing and instructive, clear quantitative indicators need to be established. Among these, the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications and the implementation rate of safety protection measures are two key indicators. First, the qualification certificate data of project construction workers is collected, and the percentage of certified personnel to the total number of personnel is calculated as the qualification compliance rate. Then, implementation records of various safety protection measures, such as protective fencing, are collected, and the ratio of implemented measures to the total planned measures is calculated to obtain the protection measure implementation rate. By evaluating these two quantitative indicators, it can be reflected whether there are any safety hazards in terms of personnel allocation and equipment setup. If either compliance rate or implementation rate is too low, a rectification plan needs to be developed for the corresponding aspect. Using this quantitative assessment method is beneficial for identifying weak points for detailed rectification, thereby effectively improving the construction safety control level of power system engineering projects.

[0054] Step 302: Determine the equipment maintenance rate based on the equipment maintenance record data, and determine the equipment failure handling rate based on the equipment failure handling data.

[0055] Among them, equipment maintenance record data refers to relevant data reflecting the maintenance, inspection, and repair status of equipment in an engineering project. In the embodiments of this application, equipment maintenance record data can be understood as equipment routine inspection reports, maintenance work records, maintenance logs, and other data.

[0056] Equipment maintenance rate refers to the ratio of the number of devices that have undergone standardized maintenance to the total number of devices during the operation and maintenance of an engineering project. In the embodiments of this application, equipment maintenance rate can be understood as the ratio of the number of devices that have completed maintenance and testing within a certain project or time period to the total number of devices in that project or system.

[0057] Equipment failure handling data refers to data reflecting the handling of equipment failures during operation and maintenance in engineering projects. In the embodiments of this application, equipment failure handling data can be understood as equipment failure reports, handling result records, and other data.

[0058] Equipment failure handling rate refers to the ratio of the number of equipment failures that have been handled to the total number of failures that occur during the operation and maintenance of equipment in an engineering project. In the embodiments of this application, equipment failure handling rate can be understood as the ratio of the number of equipment failures that have been handled to the total number of failures within a certain project or time period.

[0059] Specifically, to make the assessment of project equipment operation and maintenance status more convincing and instructive, clear quantitative indicators need to be established. Among these, equipment maintenance rate and equipment failure handling rate are two key indicators. First, the maintenance, inspection, and repair records of the equipment are statistically analyzed, and the percentage of equipment that has completed maintenance out of the total number of equipment is calculated to obtain the equipment maintenance rate. Then, data on the handling results of equipment failures during operation and maintenance are collected, and the ratio of the number of handled failures to the total number of failures is calculated as the equipment failure handling rate. Based on the calculation results of these two quantitative indicators, it is possible to intuitively determine whether there are problems in the project's equipment maintenance and failure response. If either the maintenance rate or the handling rate is too low, the corresponding equipment operation and maintenance processes and mechanisms need to be improved. Using this quantitative assessment method, weaknesses in the project's equipment operation and maintenance process can be identified, allowing for targeted improvement measures to be proposed.

[0060] Step 303: Based on the preset safety operation indicators, the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications, the implementation rate of safety protection measures, the equipment maintenance rate, and the equipment failure handling rate, identify the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency violation projects.

[0061] Specifically, to pinpoint specific safety hazards in frequently non-compliant projects, a comprehensive comparative analysis of pre-set safety operation standards and actual project execution data is necessary. This involves comparing pre-set safety operation indicators, such as the required percentage of qualified personnel, with the actual personnel qualification compliance rate calculated for the project. If a compliance rate falls below the stipulated standard, or equipment maintenance rates fail to meet requirements, a safety hazard is identified, requiring rectification. This quantitative indicator comparison method identifies specific safety loopholes in personnel, equipment, and work processes within frequently non-compliant projects, making rectification measures more targeted. Furthermore, rectification priorities can be determined based on different projects, encouraging proactive improvements from various project departments.

[0062] Based on the above embodiments, as an optional embodiment, in step 303: combining preset safety operation indicators, compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications, implementation rate of safety protection measures, equipment maintenance rate, and equipment failure handling rate, to determine the safety issues to be rectified in high-frequency violation projects, this step may also include the following steps:

[0063] Step 313: Compare the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications and the implementation rate of safety protection measures as indicators with the corresponding indicator thresholds in the construction safety indicators to obtain the construction safety assessment results.

[0064] Here, "indicator item" refers to the name of each specific indicator that makes up the safety assessment index. In the embodiments of this application, indicator items can be understood as multiple specific safety management indicators such as the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications and the implementation rate of safety protection measures. These indicator items are set to quantitatively reflect various aspects or links of safety management work and compare them with standard thresholds to assess the safety status of the project.

[0065] Construction safety indicators refer to a series of quantitative indicators used to assess and monitor the safety status of a construction project. In the embodiments of this application, construction safety indicators can be understood as pre-established assessment standards for project construction safety management by an enterprise, including multiple specific indicator items and quantitative assessment indicator thresholds for construction personnel, equipment, work processes, etc.

[0066] The construction safety assessment result refers to the assessment conclusion obtained after verifying the actual construction safety status based on the project's construction safety indicators. In the embodiments of this application, the construction safety assessment result can be understood as a quantitative assessment report on the project's construction safety status after comparing data such as the compliance rate of actual construction personnel qualifications and the implementation rate of protective measures with the requirements of safety indicators.

[0067] Specifically, to conduct a quantitative and standardized assessment of the project's construction safety status, a comprehensive safety indicator system and assessment process are needed. Enterprises formulate multiple construction safety management indicators, including the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications and the implementation rate of safety protection measures, and set quantitative assessment standards, i.e., indicator thresholds, for each indicator. During project implementation, the actual values ​​of each indicator are calculated and compared with the standard thresholds. For example, if the actual compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications reaches or exceeds the enterprise's preset standard value, then that indicator is considered qualified; similarly, the actual implementation rate of protective measures is compared with the standard value. Finally, the assessment results of all indicators are combined to form a construction safety assessment report for the project. This quantitative indicator assessment method can make construction safety management more standardized and identify which safety management aspects of the project have deficiencies or hidden dangers, enabling targeted prevention and rectification.

[0068] Step 323: Compare the equipment maintenance rate and equipment failure handling rate as indicators with the corresponding indicator thresholds in the equipment operation and maintenance safety indicators to obtain the equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment results.

[0069] Among them, equipment operation and maintenance safety indicators refer to a series of quantitative indicators used to assess and monitor the safety status of equipment operation and maintenance in engineering projects. In the embodiments of this application, equipment operation and maintenance safety indicators can be understood as the assessment standards for project equipment maintenance and fault response management pre-established by the enterprise, including multiple specific equipment operation and maintenance safety management indicators such as equipment repair rate and fault handling rate, as well as their quantitative assessment thresholds.

[0070] The equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment result refers to the assessment conclusion obtained after verifying the actual equipment operation and maintenance safety status based on the project's equipment operation and maintenance safety indicators. In the embodiments of this application, the equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment result can be understood as a quantitative assessment report on the project's equipment operation and maintenance safety status by comparing the project's actual equipment maintenance rate, fault handling rate, and other data with the requirements of the safety indicators.

[0071] Specifically, to conduct a standardized and quantitative assessment of the safety status of project equipment operation and maintenance, a comprehensive safety indicator system needs to be established. Enterprises first formulate equipment operation and maintenance safety indicators, including specific indicators such as equipment maintenance rate and fault handling rate, and provide quantitative assessment standards, i.e., thresholds, for each item. During project implementation, the actual values ​​of each item are calculated and compared with the standard thresholds one by one. For example, if the actual equipment maintenance rate of the project reaches or exceeds the preset standard value, then the evaluation of that indicator is satisfactory; similarly, the actual fault handling rate is compared with the standard value. Finally, the evaluation results of all indicators are combined to form a project equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment report. By comparing with standard indicators, it can be determined whether there are any safety hazards in equipment maintenance, fault response, etc., so as to make targeted improvements to equipment operation and maintenance processes and enhance equipment safety management levels.

[0072] Step 333: Identify the indicator items in the construction safety assessment results and equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment results that have not met the preset safety operation indicators, and designate the safety issues corresponding to the indicator items as safety issues to be rectified.

[0073] Specifically, to clearly identify specific safety hazards in a project, it is necessary to fully utilize the safety assessment results to guide safety rectification. First, based on pre-set safety operation indicators, assessment reports on the project's construction safety and equipment operation and maintenance safety have been obtained. Then, each specific indicator in the assessment report is checked one by one to determine whether its measured values ​​meet the safety requirements. For example, if the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications is not up to standard, or the equipment failure handling rate is lower than the standard requirement, then the project can be considered to have safety hazards in the corresponding aspects. Finally, all specific indicators that failed the safety indicator assessment are compiled as safety issues to be rectified in the project. By comparing them with standard safety indicators, safety rectification can be made more targeted.

[0074] Step 104: Identify the electrical equipment associated with the safety issues to be rectified; combine the information of the responsible persons for the safety issues to be rectified and the electrical equipment to generate an assessment report for high-frequency violation projects.

[0075] In this context, "power equipment" refers to various electrical facilities and electromechanical equipment used in power system engineering projects. In the embodiments of this application, "power equipment" can be understood as high-voltage switchgear, transformers, cables, monitoring systems, and other power equipment directly related to power transmission, conversion, and control. Specifying "power equipment" is intended to ensure that safety hazards or problems are associated with specific equipment and responsible personnel during safety assessments.

[0076] The information of the person in charge refers to the information of the department and personnel responsible for the operation, maintenance, and safety management of the power equipment. In the embodiments of this application, the information of the person in charge can be understood as the specific department using the power equipment, as well as the name, position, and other information of the personnel who operate, maintain, and service the equipment.

[0077] An assessment report refers to a written assessment report document generated based on the results of a project safety assessment. In the embodiments of this application, an assessment report can be understood as an assessment report document generated after inspecting and evaluating various safety hazards and risks of the project.

[0078] Specifically, to make rectification more precise and effective, it is necessary to establish a correspondence between problems, equipment, and personnel. First, based on the identified safety issues to be rectified, determine the specific electrical equipment involved or affected, such as the correlation between unqualified personnel and high-voltage switchgear. Then, using the company's asset management system, identify the departments using these electrical equipment and the information of the operators and maintenance personnel. Finally, in the safety assessment report, for each issue to be rectified, note the name of the corresponding electrical equipment and the name and position of the responsible department and personnel. In this way, the assessment report can clearly reflect each safety issue and the specific responsible party, making subsequent rectification more targeted and responsible, and promoting the company's implementation of a comprehensive safety production responsibility system involving all employees and all processes. This problem-oriented, equipment-matching, and personnel-precise safety assessment method can improve the efficiency of rectification assessments for power system projects.

[0079] Based on the above embodiments, as an optional embodiment, step 104: generating an assessment report for high-frequency violation projects by combining the safety issues to be rectified and the information of the responsible persons corresponding to the power equipment, may further include the following steps:

[0080] Step 401: Construct a correlation matrix between the safety issues to be rectified and the information of the responsible persons for the corresponding power equipment; based on the correlation matrix, determine the risk weight of the safety issues to be rectified.

[0081] In this context, an association matrix refers to a two-dimensional table that represents the relationships between multiple elements in a matrix form according to row and column correspondences. In the embodiments of this application, the association matrix can be understood as organizing the correspondence between the safety issues to be rectified, power equipment, and responsible personnel information in a matrix table, where rows and columns represent the issues and equipment / personnel, respectively, and matrix cells represent the degree of their association.

[0082] Risk weight refers to the weight obtained after quantitative analysis of each safety hazard or risk. In the embodiments of this application, risk weight can be understood as constructing a correlation matrix between the problem to be rectified and the equipment and personnel, and giving the weights corresponding to different degrees of correlation in the matrix, and finally calculating the risk weight value of each problem.

[0083] Specifically, to quantitatively analyze the risk level of each safety hazard, a correlation matrix needs to be established to establish the relationship between problems and equipment / personnel. First, based on the problems to be rectified listed in the safety assessment report, along with their corresponding electrical equipment and responsible personnel information, a correlation matrix is ​​constructed. The rows and columns of the matrix represent problems and equipment / personnel, respectively, and the intersection cells represent the correspondence between them. Then, different weights are assigned to the matrix cells according to the degree of relevance between the problems and personnel / equipment. Finally, the sum of the weights in each row is calculated to obtain the risk weight of each problem. By constructing a correlation matrix to analyze risk weights, the impact of problems on equipment and personnel can be intuitively reflected, and the severity of each problem can be quantitatively determined to prioritize rectification. This matrix model analysis method makes rectification strategies more accurate.

[0084] Based on the above embodiments, as an optional embodiment, step 401, which involves constructing an association matrix between the safety issues to be rectified and the responsible persons information corresponding to the power equipment, may further include the following steps:

[0085] Step 411: Construct a two-dimensional matrix with the safety issues to be rectified as rows and the information of the person in charge of the power equipment as columns, and use the two-dimensional matrix as an association matrix.

[0086] Specifically, to establish the correspondence between problems and equipment / personnel, a correlation matrix needs to be constructed. First, each identified safety issue requiring rectification is designated as a row in the matrix. Then, the department using the corresponding power equipment and its responsible person are designated as columns. This creates a two-dimensional matrix table linking problems with equipment and personnel. This matrix format clearly reflects the relationship between each safety issue and its corresponding equipment-using department and responsible person, providing a data foundation for subsequent risk weight calculations. Employing matrix-based quantitative analysis quantifies the complex quality and safety assessment process.

[0087] Based on the above embodiments, as an optional embodiment, step 401, which involves determining the risk weight of the security issue to be rectified based on the correlation matrix, may further include the following steps:

[0088] Step 421: Based on the preset risk level mapping table, determine the risk level corresponding to the safety issues to be rectified, and determine the number of responsible persons associated with the safety issues to be rectified in the association matrix.

[0089] The preset risk level mapping table refers to a table that maps different risk levels to specific problems before a risk assessment is conducted, based on the attributes and severity of various risks. In the embodiments of this application, the preset risk level mapping table can be understood as a table that maps various power system safety problems to risk levels, with reference to industry standards; for example, equipment defects are mapped to higher risk levels.

[0090] Specifically, to assess the risk weight of each issue, it is necessary to clarify the risk level and the number of people involved. First, based on the company's pre-set risk level mapping table, the risk level corresponding to each issue to be rectified is matched, such as general or severe risk. Then, the number of responsible persons involved in each issue row is counted in the established issue-person association matrix. By determining the risk level and the number of people involved in the security issues to be rectified, a data foundation is laid for subsequent calculation of risk weights using the matrix.

[0091] Step 431: Based on the risk level and the number of responsible persons, match the corresponding weight coefficient in the preset risk weight mapping table as the risk weight of the safety issue to be rectified.

[0092] The preset risk weight mapping table refers to a table that pre-sets the correspondence between weight coefficients based on different combinations of risk levels and the number of people involved before conducting a risk assessment. In the embodiments of this application, the preset risk weight mapping table can be understood as a table that pre-defines and maps different combinations of risk levels and the number of people involved to weight coefficients.

[0093] Specifically, to quantitatively calculate the risk weight for each issue, a matrix mapping method is needed to match the weight coefficients. First, the risk level and number of people involved for each issue are determined. Then, in the company's pre-set risk weight mapping table, the corresponding weight coefficient is found based on the issue's risk level and the number of people involved. For example, if an issue is classified as a severe risk and involves 5 people, its weight coefficient is 0.8. Calculating the weight coefficients for each issue through table lookup and matching simplifies and speeds up the process, making the results more objective and accurate, and free from subjective influence. Using a pre-set matrix mapping method to calculate weights achieves the quantification and standardization of risk assessment.

[0094] Step 402: Calculate the risk index of the safety issues to be rectified by combining the risk weights and the benchmark risk values ​​of the safety issues to be rectified.

[0095] The baseline risk value refers to the preliminary risk value determined based on the probability of occurrence and the severity of harm of various safety risks after they have been predicted. In the embodiments of this application, the baseline risk value can be understood as the risk value of each safety issue to be rectified given in advance according to the enterprise's risk classification standards before conducting a risk assessment.

[0096] The risk index is the final risk score obtained after quantitatively calculating each security risk. In the embodiments of this application, the risk index can be understood as the result of multiplying the risk weight of each problem to be rectified by the baseline risk value.

[0097] Specifically, to more accurately assess the risk level of a problem, both its impact and its inherent danger are considered. First, a correlation matrix is ​​constructed to calculate the risk weight of each problem to be rectified, representing its impact on relevant equipment and personnel. Simultaneously, a baseline risk value is given for each problem based on the company's risk rating standards, representing the inherent danger of the problem. Then, in the risk assessment matrix, the risk weight of each problem is multiplied by its baseline risk value to obtain a risk index. This risk index reflects both the degree of impact and the inherent risk of the problem, making the assessment more comprehensive and accurate.

[0098] Step 403: Obtain the location information corresponding to the safety issues to be rectified. Based on the location information and risk index, generate a safety issue distribution map of high-frequency violation projects and use the safety issue distribution map as an assessment report of high-frequency violation projects.

[0099] Location information refers to the geographic coordinates of power facilities or equipment related to the safety issue to be rectified. In the embodiments of this application, location information can be understood as spatial location-related information such as the latitude and longitude coordinates of the power equipment corresponding to the safety issue and the location of the area on the map.

[0100] A safety issue distribution map is a schematic diagram that visualizes the location information and risk index of various safety issues to be rectified on a map. In the embodiments of this application, a safety issue distribution map can be understood as marking the location coordinates and risk level of each issue on a map with dots of different sizes and colors, forming a spatial distribution map of the issues.

[0101] Specifically, to reflect the spatial distribution of problems, a risk distribution map of safety issues needs to be drawn. First, the geographical coordinates of the power equipment associated with each problem to be rectified are retrieved as location information. Then, each problem point is marked on the map, and its risk index is represented by different sizes and colors, with larger red dots indicating higher risk. Finally, the risk distribution map is generated and forms part of the assessment report. Through the problem distribution map, managers can intuitively see the geographically concentrated areas of high-risk problems, which is very helpful in formulating regional and graded rectification strategies. At the same time, the map-based presentation makes the assessment report richer and more vivid, allowing managers to better grasp the distribution of problems. Using location-based information and visualization methods can make the safety assessment of the power system more targeted and improve the efficiency of the safety assessment.

[0102] Reference Figure 2 This application provides an embodiment of a power enterprise engineering project safety issue special rectification assessment system, which includes: an information acquisition module, a project identification module, a safety issue determination module, and a safety assessment module, wherein:

[0103] The information acquisition module is used to acquire historical operational information of multiple engineering projects in the power company to be evaluated;

[0104] The project identification module is used to identify high-frequency violation projects based on the number of unlicensed operations in each historical operation information.

[0105] The safety issue identification module is used to receive the current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of high-frequency non-compliant projects, and to conduct a safety assessment of the construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data according to preset safety operation indicators to identify the safety issues to be rectified in high-frequency non-compliant projects.

[0106] The safety assessment module is used to identify the power equipment associated with the safety issues to be rectified; and by combining the information of the responsible persons for the safety issues to be rectified and the power equipment, an assessment report on high-frequency violation projects is generated.

[0107] Based on the above embodiments, the project identification module is also used to calculate the average number of unlicensed operations for each project based on the number of unlicensed operations; multiply the average number of unlicensed operations by a preset coefficient to obtain the threshold number of unlicensed operations; compare the number of unlicensed operations for each project with the threshold number of unlicensed operations; if the number of unlicensed operations for a project is greater than or equal to the threshold number of unlicensed operations, then the project is identified as a high-frequency violation project.

[0108] Based on the above embodiments, the safety issue determination module is also used to determine the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications based on the construction personnel qualification data, and to determine the implementation rate of safety protection measures based on the implementation data of safety protection measures; to determine the equipment maintenance rate based on the equipment maintenance record data, and to determine the equipment failure handling rate based on the equipment failure handling data; and to determine the safety issues to be rectified in high-frequency violation projects by combining preset safety operation indicators, construction personnel qualification compliance rate, safety protection measure implementation rate, equipment maintenance rate, and equipment failure handling rate.

[0109] Based on the above embodiments, the safety issue determination module is also used to compare the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications and the implementation rate of safety protection measures as indicator items with the corresponding indicator thresholds in the construction safety indicators to obtain the construction safety assessment results; to compare the equipment maintenance rate and equipment failure handling rate as indicator items with the corresponding indicator thresholds in the equipment operation and maintenance safety indicators to obtain the equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment results; to determine the indicator items in the construction safety assessment results and equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment results that have not met the preset safety operation indicators, and to designate the safety issues corresponding to the indicator items as safety issues to be rectified.

[0110] Based on the above embodiments, the safety assessment module is also used to construct an association matrix between the safety issues to be rectified and the information of the responsible persons corresponding to the power equipment; based on the association matrix, determine the risk weight of the safety issues to be rectified; combine the risk weight and the benchmark risk value of the safety issues to be rectified to calculate the risk index of the safety issues to be rectified; obtain the location information corresponding to the safety issues to be rectified; based on the location information and the risk index, generate a safety issue distribution map of high-frequency non-compliant projects, and use the safety issue distribution map as an assessment report of high-frequency non-compliant projects.

[0111] Based on the above embodiments, the safety assessment module is also used to construct a two-dimensional matrix with the safety issues to be rectified as rows and the information of the person in charge of the power equipment as columns, and to use the two-dimensional matrix as an association matrix.

[0112] Based on the above embodiments, the security assessment module is also used to determine the risk level corresponding to the security issue to be rectified based on a preset risk level mapping table, and to determine the number of responsible persons associated with the security issue to be rectified in the association matrix; according to the risk level and the number of responsible persons, the module matches the corresponding weight coefficient in the preset risk weight mapping table as the risk weight of the security issue to be rectified.

[0113] It should be noted that the above embodiments of the apparatus are only illustrated by the division of the above functional modules. In practical applications, the above functions can be assigned to different functional modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the device can be divided into different functional modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. In addition, the apparatus and method embodiments provided in the above embodiments belong to the same concept, and the specific implementation process can be found in the method embodiments, which will not be repeated here.

[0114] This application also discloses an electronic device. (See reference...) Figure 3 , Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device disclosed in an embodiment of this application. The electronic device 300 may include: at least one processor 301, at least one network interface 304, a user interface 303, a memory 305, and at least one communication bus 302.

[0115] The communication bus 302 is used to enable communication between these components.

[0116] The user interface 303 may include a display interface and a camera interface. Optionally, the user interface 303 may also include a standard wired interface and a wireless interface.

[0117] The network interface 304 may optionally include a standard wired interface or a wireless interface (such as a Wi-Fi interface).

[0118] The processor 301 may include one or more processing cores. The processor 301 connects to various parts of the server using various interfaces and lines, and performs various server functions and processes data by running or executing instructions, programs, code sets, or instruction sets stored in the memory 305, and by calling data stored in the memory 305. Optionally, the processor 301 may be implemented using at least one hardware form of Digital Signal Processing (DSP), Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), or Programmable Logic Array (PLA). The processor 301 may integrate one or a combination of several of the following: Central Processing Unit (CPU), Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), and modem. The CPU primarily handles the operating system, user interface graphics, and applications; the GPU is responsible for rendering and drawing the content required for display; and the modem handles wireless communication. It is understood that the modem may also not be integrated into the processor 301 and may be implemented as a separate chip.

[0119] The memory 305 may include random access memory (RAM) or read-only memory. Optionally, the memory 305 may include a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium. The memory 305 may be used to store instructions, programs, code, code sets, or instruction sets. The memory 305 may include a program storage area and a data storage area, wherein the program storage area may store instructions for implementing an operating system, instructions for at least one function (such as touch function, sound playback function, image playback function, etc.), instructions for implementing the above-described method embodiments, etc.; the data storage area may store data involved in the above-described method embodiments, etc. Optionally, the memory 305 may also be at least one storage device located remotely from the aforementioned processor 301. (Refer to...) Figure 3 The memory 305, which serves as a computer storage medium, may include an operating system, a network communication module, a user interface module, and an application program for evaluating a special rectification method for safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects.

[0120] exist Figure 3In the illustrated electronic device 300, the user interface 303 is mainly used to provide an input interface for the user and to acquire user input data; while the processor 301 can be used to call an application program stored in the memory 305 that describes a method for evaluating the special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects. When executed by one or more processors 301, the electronic device 300 performs one or more methods as described in the above embodiments. It should be noted that, for the foregoing method embodiments, for the sake of simplicity, they are all described as a series of actions. However, those skilled in the art should understand that this application is not limited to the described order of actions, because according to this application, some steps can be performed in other orders or simultaneously. Secondly, those skilled in the art should also understand that the embodiments described in the specification are all preferred embodiments, and the actions and modules involved are not necessarily essential to this application.

[0121] In the above embodiments, the descriptions of each embodiment have different focuses. For parts not described in detail in a certain embodiment, please refer to the relevant descriptions in other embodiments.

[0122] In the various embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus can be implemented in other ways. For example, the apparatus embodiments described above are merely illustrative; for instance, the division of units is only a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. For example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not executed. Furthermore, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed may be through some service interface; the indirect coupling or communication connection between apparatuses or units may be electrical or other forms.

[0123] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate. The components shown as units may or may not be physical units; that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of the units can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.

[0124] Furthermore, the functional units in the various embodiments of this application can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional unit.

[0125] If the integrated unit is implemented as a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage device (CMD). Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this application, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a memory and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods of the various embodiments of this application. The aforementioned memory includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0126] The above are merely exemplary embodiments of this disclosure and should not be construed as limiting the scope of this disclosure. Any equivalent changes and modifications made in accordance with the teachings of this disclosure shall still fall within the scope of this disclosure. Other embodiments of this disclosure will readily conceive of those skilled in the art upon consideration of the specification and the disclosure of practical truths.

[0127] This application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of this disclosure that follow the general principles of this disclosure and include common knowledge or customary techniques in the art not described in this disclosure. The specification and embodiments are to be considered exemplary only.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating special rectification of safety problems in power enterprise engineering projects, characterized in that, The method comprises: obtaining historical operation information of a plurality of engineering projects in a power enterprise to be evaluated; determining high-frequency violation projects based on the number of ticketless operations in each of the historical operation information; receiving current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation projects, and performing safety evaluation on the construction data and the equipment operation and maintenance data according to a preset safety operation index to determine a safety problem to be rectified in the high-frequency violation projects; determining power equipment associated with the safety problem to be rectified; generating an evaluation report of the high-frequency violation projects in combination with the safety problem to be rectified and the information of the person in charge corresponding to the power equipment; The method comprises: calculating the average number of ticketless operations of each engineering project based on the number of ticketless operations in each of the historical operation information; multiplying the average number of ticketless operations by a preset coefficient to obtain a ticketless operation number threshold value; comparing the number of ticketless operations of each engineering project with the ticketless operation number threshold value; if the number of ticketless operations of the engineering project is greater than or equal to the ticketless operation number threshold value, the engineering project is determined as a high-frequency violation project; The method comprises: constructing an association matrix of the safety problem to be rectified and the information of the person in charge corresponding to the power equipment; determining a risk weight of the safety problem to be rectified based on the association matrix; calculating a risk index of the safety problem to be rectified in combination with the risk weight and a benchmark risk value of the safety problem to be rectified; obtaining location information corresponding to the safety problem to be rectified, generating a safety problem distribution map of the high-frequency violation projects based on the location information and the risk index, and taking the safety problem distribution map as the evaluation report of the high-frequency violation projects; The construction data includes construction personnel qualification data and safety protection measure execution data, and the equipment operation and maintenance data includes equipment maintenance record data and equipment fault handling data. The method comprises: determining a construction personnel qualification compliance rate according to the construction personnel qualification data, and determining a safety protection measure implementation rate according to the safety protection measure execution data; determining an equipment maintenance rate according to the equipment maintenance record data, and determining an equipment fault handling rate according to the equipment fault handling data; determining the safety problem to be rectified in the high-frequency violation projects in combination with the preset safety operation index, the construction personnel qualification compliance rate, the safety protection measure implementation rate, the equipment maintenance rate, and the equipment fault handling rate. The preset safe operation index includes a construction safety index and a device operation and maintenance safety index. The combination of the preset safe operation index, the construction personnel qualification compliance rate, the safety protection measure implementation rate, the device maintenance rate, and the device fault handling rate determines the safety problems to be rectified in the high-frequency violation project, including: The construction personnel qualification compliance rate and the safety protection measure implementation rate are compared with corresponding index thresholds in the construction safety index as index items, and a construction safety evaluation result is obtained; The device maintenance rate and the device fault handling rate are compared with corresponding index thresholds in the device operation and maintenance safety index as index items, and a device operation and maintenance safety evaluation result is obtained; The index items that do not reach the preset safe operation index in the construction safety evaluation result and the device operation and maintenance safety evaluation result are determined, and the safety problems corresponding to the index items are taken as the safety problems to be rectified; The construction of the association matrix of the safety problems to be rectified and the responsible person information corresponding to the power equipment includes: A two-dimensional matrix is constructed with the safety problems to be rectified as rows and the responsible person information corresponding to the power equipment as columns, and the two-dimensional matrix is taken as the association matrix; The determination of the risk weight of the safety problems to be rectified based on the association matrix includes: Based on a preset risk level mapping table, the risk level corresponding to the safety problems to be rectified is determined, and the number of persons responsible for the safety problems to be rectified is determined in the association matrix; According to the risk level and the number of persons responsible, a corresponding weight coefficient is matched in a preset risk weight mapping table as the risk weight of the safety problems to be rectified.

2. A special rectification evaluation system for safety problems of power enterprise engineering projects, characterized in that, The system includes: An information acquisition module is configured to acquire historical operation information of a plurality of engineering projects in an electric power enterprise to be evaluated; A project identification module is configured to determine high-frequency violation projects based on the number of ticketless operations in each of the historical operation information; A safety problem determination module is configured to receive current construction data and device operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation projects, and perform safety evaluation on the construction data and the device operation and maintenance data according to a preset safe operation index to determine safety problems to be rectified in the high-frequency violation projects; A safety evaluation module is configured to determine power equipment associated with the safety problems to be rectified, and generate an evaluation report of the high-frequency violation projects in combination with the safety problems to be rectified and responsible person information corresponding to the power equipment; The determination of the high-frequency violation projects based on the number of ticketless operations in each of the historical operation information includes: Based on the number of ticketless operations in each of the historical operation information, the average number of ticketless operations of each of the engineering projects is calculated; The average number of ticketless operations is multiplied by a preset coefficient to obtain a ticketless operation number threshold; the number of ticketless operations of each of the engineering projects is compared with the ticketless operation number threshold; If the number of ticketless operations of the engineering project is greater than or equal to the ticketless operation number threshold, the engineering project is determined as a high-frequency violation project. The responsible person information corresponding to the power equipment of the to-be-reformed safety problem is combined to generate the evaluation report of the high-frequency violation project, including: An association matrix of the to-be-reformed safety problem and the responsible person information corresponding to the power equipment is constructed; and the risk weight of the to-be-reformed safety problem is determined based on the association matrix; The risk index of the to-be-reformed safety problem is calculated by combining the risk weight and the benchmark risk value of the to-be-reformed safety problem; The location information corresponding to the to-be-reformed safety problem is obtained, and a safety problem distribution map of the high-frequency violation project is generated based on the location information and the risk index, and the safety problem distribution map is taken as the evaluation report of the high-frequency violation project; The construction data includes construction personnel qualification data and safety protection measure execution data, and the equipment operation and maintenance data includes equipment maintenance record data and equipment fault handling data, and the safety assessment is performed on the construction data and the equipment operation and maintenance data according to the preset safety operation index to determine the to-be-reformed safety problem in the high-frequency violation project, including: The construction personnel qualification compliance rate is determined according to the construction personnel qualification data, and the safety protection measure implementation rate is determined according to the safety protection measure execution data; The equipment maintenance rate is determined according to the equipment maintenance record data, and the equipment fault handling rate is determined according to the equipment fault handling data; The to-be-reformed safety problem in the high-frequency violation project is determined by combining the preset safety operation index, the construction personnel qualification compliance rate, the safety protection measure implementation rate, the equipment maintenance rate, and the equipment fault handling rate; The preset safety operation index includes a construction safety index and an equipment operation and maintenance safety index, and the to-be-reformed safety problem in the high-frequency violation project is determined by combining the preset safety operation index, the construction personnel qualification compliance rate, the safety protection measure implementation rate, the equipment maintenance rate, and the equipment fault handling rate, including: The construction personnel qualification compliance rate and the safety protection measure implementation rate are compared with the corresponding index threshold values in the construction safety index as index items to obtain a construction safety evaluation result; The equipment maintenance rate and the equipment fault handling rate are compared with the corresponding index threshold values in the equipment operation and maintenance safety index as index items to obtain an equipment operation and maintenance safety evaluation result; The index items that do not reach the preset safety operation index in the construction safety evaluation result and the equipment operation and maintenance safety evaluation result are determined, and the safety problems corresponding to the index items are taken as the to-be-reformed safety problem; The association matrix of the to-be-reformed safety problem and the responsible person information corresponding to the power equipment includes: A two-dimensional matrix is constructed with the to-be-reformed safety problem as the row and the responsible person information corresponding to the power equipment as the column, and the two-dimensional matrix is taken as the association matrix; The risk weight of the to-be-reformed safety problem is determined based on the association matrix, including: determine, based on a preset risk level mapping table, a risk level corresponding to the safety problem to be rectified, and determine, in the association matrix, a number of persons in charge associated with the safety problem to be rectified; match, according to the risk level and the number of persons in charge, a corresponding weight coefficient in a preset risk weight mapping table as a risk weight of the safety problem to be rectified.

3. An electronic device, comprising: The electronic device comprises a processor, a memory, a user interface and a network interface. The memory is configured to store instructions. The user interface and the network interface are configured to communicate with other devices. The processor is configured to execute the instructions stored in the memory, so that the electronic device performs the method for special rectification evaluation of safety problems of a power enterprise engineering project according to claim 1.

4. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer readable storage medium stores instructions which, when executed, perform the method for special rectification evaluation of safety problems of a power enterprise engineering project according to claim 1.

Images