Quality evaluation method and system for medical glass product

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of quality evaluation of medical glass products, in particular to a quality evaluation method and system for medical glass products, and the method comprises the steps: confirming one or more to-be-evaluated medical glass products, and obtaining a historical accident set based on the extracted medical glass quality, the historical accident data is composed of accident time, accident reasons, types of medical glass and drugs stored in the medical glass products, obtaining one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set, determining an evaluation quantity by using the target fault sets, obtaining an evaluation glass product set based on the evaluation quantity, and determining the evaluation glass product set according to the evaluation quantity. And obtaining target fault time, one or more consistency evaluation values, airtight evaluation content and defective proportion of the evaluation glass product set. According to the invention, the accuracy of medical glass product quality evaluation can be improved, and excessive consumption of time and human resources can be reduced.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of quality assessment of medical glass products, and in particular to a quality assessment method, system, electronic equipment and computer-readable storage medium for medical glass products. Background Art

[0002] With the continuous development of medical technology, medical glass products are increasingly used in the medical field. However, due to the particularity and complexity of medical glass products, their quality and safety issues have attracted much attention. Therefore, accurate quality assessment of medical glass products is of great significance to ensure their safe and reliable application.

[0003] At present, the quality assessment methods for medical glass products usually adopt methods such as appearance inspection and physical property testing. Although these methods can achieve the purpose of quality assessment of medical glass products, they require a lot of time and human resources when conducting quality assessment of medical glass products, and the degree of intelligence needs to be improved. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present invention provides a quality assessment method for medical glass products and a computer-readable storage medium, the main purpose of which is to improve the accuracy of quality assessment of medical glass products and reduce excessive consumption of time and human resources.

[0005] To achieve the above object, the present invention provides a quality assessment method for medical glass products, comprising: receiving a glass quality assessment instruction, and confirming a glass quality assessment environment based on the glass quality assessment instruction, wherein the glass quality assessment environment includes: one or more medical glass products to be assessed and a quality assessment system for assessing glass quality, wherein the quality assessment system is composed of a data acquisition unit, a consistency test unit, an airtightness test unit, and a data feedback unit; Extracting medical glass products from the one or more medical glass products in sequence, and performing the following operations on the extracted medical glass products: Using the data acquisition unit and the extracted medical glass products to obtain a historical accident set, wherein the historical accident set includes a plurality of historical accident data, and the historical accident data is composed of accident time, accident cause, type of medical glass, and medicine stored in the medical glass products; Obtain one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set; Extract target fault sets from the one or more target fault sets in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted target fault sets: Determine an evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set, obtain an evaluation glass product set based on the evaluation quantity, and obtain a target fault time of the evaluation glass product set, wherein the evaluation glass product set includes a plurality of initial evaluation glass products, and the quantity corresponding to the plurality of initial evaluation glass products is the evaluation quantity; receiving a consistency test instruction from a consistency test unit, and acquiring one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the glass product set based on the consistency test instruction; Acquire the airtightness evaluation content of the evaluated glass product set based on the airtightness test unit, and acquire the defective ratio based on the evaluated glass product set; The data feedback unit is used to send the one or more consistency evaluation values, target failure time, defective ratio and airtight evaluation content to the initiator of the glass quality evaluation instruction, so as to realize the quality evaluation of the glass product.

[0006] Optionally, acquiring one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set includes: The historical accident data are sequentially extracted from the historical accident set, and the following operations are performed on the extracted historical accident data: Acquiring reference identification information based on the extracted historical accident data, wherein the reference identification information is composed of the cause of the accident, the type of medical glass, and the medicine stored in the medical glass product; Using the reference identification information, performing an identification operation on the extracted historical accident data to obtain identified accident data; The identified accident data are respectively aggregated according to the reference identification information corresponding to the identified accident data to obtain one or more target fault sets.

[0007] Optionally, determining the evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set includes: The historical accident data are sequentially extracted from the target fault set, and the following operations are performed on the extracted historical accident data: Obtaining the first cause of the accident based on the extracted historical accident data and the pre-trained accident cause identification model; If the first accident cause is a usage accident cause, the extracted historical accident data is retained; If the first cause of the accident is an accidental cause, the extracted historical accident data is eliminated; Summarize the retained historical accident data to obtain a first fault set; Determine the target usage quantity according to the target fault set, and obtain the accident ratio based on the target usage quantity and the first fault set, wherein the accident ratio is the ratio of the quantity corresponding to the historical accident data in the first fault set to the target usage quantity; Get an assessment value based on the accident ratio.

[0008] Optionally, obtaining an evaluation value based on the accident ratio includes: Get the piecewise proportional function of the accident ratio, where the piecewise proportional function is as follows: ; ; ... ; in, are all preset coefficients. All are preset ratios. Indicates the proportion of accidents described; The target ratio is confirmed in the piecewise ratio function using the accident ratio, and the evaluation value is calculated using the target ratio. The calculation formula is as follows: ; in, represents the evaluation value, represents the target ratio, Represents the critical value of the standard normal distribution corresponding to the preset confidence interval, Represents the half-width of the preset confidence interval.

[0009] Optionally, obtaining one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the glass product set based on the consistency test instruction includes: Initial evaluation glass products are extracted from the evaluation glass product set in sequence, and the following operations are performed on the extracted initial evaluation glass products: Obtaining a production standard size set for an initial evaluation of a glass product, wherein the production standard size set includes a plurality of reference parameters, and the reference parameters include: a reference thickness, a reference length, and a reference diameter; Extract reference parameters from the multiple reference parameters in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted reference parameters: Acquire a production standard range based on the extracted reference parameters, wherein the production standard range corresponds to the extracted reference parameters one by one, and acquire an actual size set using the extracted reference parameters and the production standard range, wherein the actual size set includes a plurality of actual sizes; Extract actual dimensions from the actual dimension set in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted actual dimensions: If the actual dimensions in the actual dimension set are all within the production standard range, the reference consistency value is calculated using the pre-constructed consistency relationship. Otherwise, the initial evaluation glass product corresponding to the actual dimension is identified as a defective glass product. The consistency relationship is as follows: ; in, Indicates the extracted Reference consistency values ​​for reference parameters, Indicates that the actual size set includes Actual size, Indicates the actual size set Actual size; One or more consistency evaluation values ​​are obtained based on the reference consistency value.

[0010] Optionally, acquiring one or more consistency evaluation values ​​based on the reference consistency value includes: The reference consistency values ​​are respectively summarized according to the extracted reference parameters and the production standard range to obtain one or more reference consistency value sets, reference consistency value sets are sequentially extracted from the one or more reference consistency value sets, and the following operations are performed on the extracted reference consistency value sets: The consistency evaluation value is calculated based on the extracted reference consistency value set and the pre-constructed consistency evaluation relationship, where the consistency evaluation relationship is as follows: ; in, represents the consistency assessment value, For the preset coefficients, Indicates the extracted Reference parameters, Indicates that the total number of glass products retained for initial evaluation is indivual; The consistency evaluation values ​​are aggregated to obtain one or more consistency evaluation values.

[0011] Optionally, obtaining a target failure time of the glass product set for evaluation includes: The target failure time is calculated based on the extracted target failure set. The calculation formula is as follows: ; in, Indicates the target fault set The accident time corresponding to the historical accident data, Indicates that the target fault set has Historical accident data, Indicates the target failure time.

[0012] Optionally, obtaining the airtightness evaluation content of the glass product set based on the airtightness testing unit includes: Initial evaluation glass products are sequentially extracted from the evaluation glass product set, and the following operations are performed on the extracted initial evaluation glass products: Performing a sealing operation on the evaluated glass product to obtain a sealed glass product, and performing a vacuum test operation on the sealed glass product using a pre-built vacuum tester to obtain a test pressure value; Acquire an actual pressure difference value based on the test pressure value; Comparing the actual pressure difference value with a preset pressure difference threshold, if the actual pressure difference value is greater than or equal to the pressure difference threshold, marking the initially evaluated glass product as an airtight defective glass product; Otherwise, the actual pressure difference values ​​are summarized to obtain an actual pressure difference value set, and the airtightness assessment content is obtained based on the actual pressure difference value set.

[0013] Optionally, obtaining the defective ratio based on the evaluated glass product set includes: Summarize defective glass products to obtain a defective glass product set, wherein the defective glass products include: defective size glass products and airtight defective glass products; The defective ratio is calculated based on the defective glass product set and the evaluated glass product set. The calculation formula is as follows: ; in, represents the number of defective glass products included in the defective glass product set, Indicates the defective ratio.

[0014] To achieve the above object, the present invention also provides a quality assessment system for medical glass products, comprising: An instruction receiving and environment confirmation module, used for receiving a glass quality assessment instruction and confirming a glass quality assessment environment based on the glass quality assessment instruction, wherein the glass quality assessment environment includes: one or more medical glass products to be assessed and a quality assessment system for assessing glass quality, wherein the quality assessment system is composed of a data acquisition unit, a consistency test unit, an airtightness test unit and a data feedback unit; The historical data partitioning module is used to extract medical glass products from the one or more medical glass products in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted medical glass products: Using the data acquisition unit and the extracted medical glass products to obtain a historical accident set, wherein the historical accident set includes a plurality of historical accident data, and the historical accident data is composed of accident time, accident cause, type of medical glass, and medicine stored in the medical glass products; Obtain one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set; The quality assessment module is used to sequentially extract target fault sets from the one or more target fault sets, and perform the following operations on the extracted target fault sets: Determine an evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set, obtain an evaluation glass product set based on the evaluation quantity, and obtain a target fault time of the evaluation glass product set, wherein the evaluation glass product set includes a plurality of initial evaluation glass products, and the quantity corresponding to the plurality of initial evaluation glass products is the evaluation quantity; receiving a consistency test instruction from a consistency test unit, and acquiring one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the glass product set based on the consistency test instruction; Acquire the airtightness evaluation content of the evaluated glass product set based on the airtightness test unit, and acquire the defective ratio based on the evaluated glass product set; The quality assessment feedback module is used to use the data feedback unit to send the one or more consistency assessment values, target failure time, defective ratio and airtightness assessment content to the initiator of the glass quality assessment instruction to achieve quality assessment of the glass product.

[0015] In order to solve the above problem, the present invention further provides an electronic device, the electronic device comprising: a memory storing at least one instruction; and A processor executes the instructions stored in the memory to implement the quality assessment method for medical glass products described above.

[0016] In order to solve the above problems, the present invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein at least one instruction is stored in the computer-readable storage medium, and the at least one instruction is executed by a processor in an electronic device to implement the above-mentioned quality assessment method for medical glass products.

[0017] The present invention is to solve the problem described in the background technology. The present invention receives a glass quality assessment instruction and confirms a glass quality assessment environment based on the glass quality assessment instruction, wherein the glass quality assessment environment includes: one or more medical glass products to be assessed and a quality assessment system for assessing glass quality, wherein the quality assessment system is composed of a data acquisition unit, a consistency test unit, an airtightness test unit and a data feedback unit. It can be seen that when considering the quality assessment of medical glass products in the embodiment of the present invention, the proposed quality assessment system is composed of multiple units, and each unit can realize different processing methods for medical glass products, thereby realizing the quality assessment of medical glass products. A relatively comprehensive and accurate quality assessment of glass products is provided. On this basis, the present invention obtains a historical accident set by utilizing a data acquisition unit and the extracted medical glass products, wherein the historical accident set includes multiple historical accident data, and the historical accident data is composed of accident time, accident cause, type of medical glass and medicines stored in the medical glass products. One or more target fault sets are obtained based on the historical accident set, and the historical accident set is obtained according to the type of medical glass extracted, and the historical accident set is divided into one or more target fault sets in combination with the medicines stored in the medical glass products, the type of medical glass and the cause of the accident in actual use. Furthermore, the present invention confirms the evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set, obtains the evaluation glass product set based on the evaluation quantity, and obtains the target fault time of the evaluation glass product set, wherein the evaluation glass product set includes multiple initial evaluation glass products, and the number corresponding to the multiple initial evaluation glass products is the evaluation quantity. It can be seen that after obtaining a relatively accurate target fault set, the present invention confirms the evaluation quantity that can represent the batch of medical glass products through the target fault set, and obtains the evaluation glass product set through the evaluation quantity. Then, only by evaluating the quality of the evaluation glass product set, it is possible to achieve an accurate evaluation of the batch of medical glass products, and only when the quality evaluation of the evaluation glass product set is performed, time and excessive human resources are saved. Next, the present invention receives a consistency test instruction from a consistency test unit, obtains one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the evaluation glass product set based on the consistency test instruction, obtains the airtight evaluation content of the evaluation glass product set based on the airtight test unit, and obtains the defective ratio based on the evaluation glass product set. It can be seen that the embodiment of the present invention performs multiple tests on the evaluation glass product set and obtains multiple parameters for expressing the quality evaluation of medical glass products. Therefore, the present invention can improve the accuracy of the quality evaluation of medical glass products and reduce the excessive consumption of time and human resources. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0018] Figure 1 A schematic flow chart of a quality assessment method for medical glass products provided in one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2A functional module diagram of a quality assessment system for medical glass products provided by one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 A schematic structural diagram of an electronic device for implementing the quality assessment method for medical glass products provided by one embodiment of the present invention.

[0019] The realization of the purpose, functional features and advantages of the present invention will be further explained in conjunction with embodiments and with reference to the accompanying drawings. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0020] It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present invention, and are not used to limit the present invention.

[0021] The embodiment of the present application provides a quality assessment method for medical glass products. The execution subject of the quality assessment method for medical glass products includes but is not limited to at least one of the electronic devices such as a server and a terminal that can be configured to execute the method provided in the embodiment of the present application. In other words, the quality assessment method for medical glass products can be executed by software or hardware installed in a terminal device or a server device, and the software can be a blockchain platform. The server includes but is not limited to: a single server, a server cluster, a cloud server or a cloud server cluster, etc.

[0022] Reference Figure 1 FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a quality assessment method for medical glass products provided by an embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, the quality assessment method for medical glass products includes: S1. Receive a glass quality assessment instruction, and confirm a glass quality assessment environment based on the glass quality assessment instruction, wherein the glass quality assessment environment includes: one or more medical glass products to be assessed and a quality assessment system for assessing glass quality, wherein the quality assessment system is composed of a data acquisition unit, a consistency test unit, an airtightness test unit, and a data feedback unit.

[0023] It is understandable that the glass quality assessment instruction is an instruction issued for quality assessment of medical glass products. The glass quality assessment environment is a necessary environment constructed for quality assessment of medical glass products. Medical glass refers to glass products specially used in the medical field, such as test tubes, medical drug containers and bottle stoppers. The quality assessment system is software such as APP or mini-programs for quality assessment of medical glass products, and the quality assessment system is composed of a data acquisition unit, a consistency test unit, an airtightness test unit and a data feedback unit. For the application of specific units, please refer to the subsequent embodiments.

[0024] For example, Xiao Zhang, as a glass quality assessor in a factory, now needs to conduct a quality assessment on a batch of medical glass. Therefore, Xiao Zhang issues a glass quality assessment instruction, and based on the glass quality assessment instruction, identifies the medical test tubes, medical drug containers and software for assessing glass quality to be assessed, wherein the medical test tubes and medical drug containers are one or more medical glass products to be assessed, and the software for assessing glass quality is the quality assessment system.

[0025] S2. Utilize the data acquisition unit and the extracted medical glass products to obtain a historical accident set, wherein the historical accident set includes a plurality of historical accident data, and the historical accident data is composed of accident time, accident cause, type of medical glass, and medicines stored in the medical glass products.

[0026] It is understandable that the historical accident set is a collection of data recorded by one or more hospitals when medical glass products cannot work properly due to accidental breakage or damage caused by improper operation during actual use. The accident time refers to the time when the medical glass products cannot be used normally. The cause of the accident refers to the reason why the medical glass products cannot be used normally, and the type of medical glass refers to the type of medical glass products.

[0027] Exemplarily, the historical accident data is: at 5:00 p.m. on a certain day in a certain month of a certain year, a medical drug storage container storing Type A drugs ruptured naturally, wherein 5:00 p.m. on a certain day in a certain month of a certain year is the accident time, natural rupture is the cause of the accident, the type of medical glass is a medical drug storage container, and the drugs stored in the medical glass products are Type A drugs.

[0028] S3. Obtain one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set.

[0029] It should be explained that the step of obtaining one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set includes: The historical accident data are sequentially extracted from the historical accident set, and the following operations are performed on the extracted historical accident data: Acquiring reference identification information based on the extracted historical accident data, wherein the reference identification information is composed of the cause of the accident, the type of medical glass, and the medicine stored in the medical glass product; Using the reference identification information, performing an identification operation on the extracted historical accident data to obtain identified accident data; The identified accident data are respectively aggregated according to the reference identification information corresponding to the identified accident data to obtain one or more target fault sets.

[0030] It is understandable that the reference identification information is a reference for dividing the historical accident data. When the same medical glass product stores different types of drugs, different types of drugs may produce different corrosion or erosion effects on the same medical glass product. Therefore, classifying the historical accident set into one or more target fault sets according to the reference identification information can improve the accuracy of the historical accident data division, and then improve the accuracy of the subsequent confirmation evaluation quantity.

[0031] Exemplarily, the historical accident set includes 10 historical accident data. According to the reference identification information corresponding to the historical accident data, the first three historical accident data can be identified as: natural rupture, data on the first type of medical drug storage container and type A drugs, and the last three historical accident data can be identified as: rupture due to collision, data on the first type of medical drug storage container and type B drugs. The remaining historical accident data can be identified as: rupture during high-temperature disinfection, data on the second type of medical drug storage container and the substance corresponding to high-temperature disinfection. Then, the identified accident data corresponding to the historical accident data are respectively summarized according to the reference identification information corresponding to the identified accident data to obtain three target fault sets.

[0032] S4. Confirm an evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set, obtain an evaluation glass product set based on the evaluation quantity, and obtain a target fault time of the evaluation glass product set, wherein the evaluation glass product set includes multiple initial evaluation glass products, and the quantity corresponding to the multiple initial evaluation glass products is the evaluation quantity.

[0033] It is understandable that the evaluation quantity is the number of samples that can represent a batch of medical glass products according to the target fault set. For example, by analyzing the target fault set, it is confirmed that five medical glass products are randomly selected from a batch of medical glass products. By evaluating the quality of these five medical glass products, the results of the quality evaluation of these five medical glass products can represent this batch of medical glass products.

[0034] It should be explained that the evaluation quantity determined based on the extracted target fault set includes: The historical accident data are sequentially extracted from the target fault set, and the following operations are performed on the extracted historical accident data: Obtaining the first cause of the accident based on the extracted historical accident data and the pre-trained accident cause identification model; If the first accident cause is a usage accident cause, the extracted historical accident data is retained; If the first cause of the accident is an accidental cause, the extracted historical accident data is eliminated; Summarize the retained historical accident data to obtain a first fault set; Determine the target usage quantity according to the target fault set, and obtain the accident ratio based on the target usage quantity and the first fault set, wherein the accident ratio is the ratio of the quantity corresponding to the historical accident data in the first fault set to the target usage quantity; Get an assessment value based on the accident ratio.

[0035] Furthermore, the cause of the use accident refers to the reason why the medical glass products are damaged or broken during use, for example: the medical glass products break during high-temperature sterilization, and holes are found in the medical glass products after the medical glass products are used for drug storage, etc. The cause of the accident refers to the cause of the accident corresponding to the medical glass products: the cause corresponding to the inability of the medical glass products to continue to be used normally due to unexpected circumstances during transportation or taking of the medical glass products. For example: when taking a drug storage container, the drug storage container is damaged due to accidental bumping. Optionally, the accident cause identification model is a semantic-based neural network model, and other technologies can achieve the same effect, which will not be repeated here.

[0036] It can be understood that the target usage quantity is the number of medical glass products with the same type of medical glass, stored medicines and production standards as the target accident set, while the first fault set is a collection of medical glass products that cannot continue to be used normally when the type of medical glass, production standards and stored medicines are the same as the target usage quantity. Therefore, the accident ratio can be used to show the probability of accidents occurring in medical glass products when a certain medicine is actually stored. For example: there are 5 historical accident data in the first fault set, and the target usage quantity is 100, then the accident ratio is 5%.

[0037] Furthermore, different types of medical glass, different production standards, and different stored medicines may have different effects on medical glass products. For example, because the temperature difference resistance requirement of the first production standard is higher than that of the second production standard, the proportion of medical glass products that break due to temperature difference under the first production standard is lower than that of medical glass products that break due to temperature difference under the second production standard. The type of medical glass and the type of stored medicines will affect the actual use of medical glass products, and the same effect can be achieved with the production standard, so it will not be repeated here.

[0038] It should be explained that the evaluation value obtained based on the accident ratio includes: Get the piecewise proportional function of the accident ratio, where the piecewise proportional function is as follows: ; ; ... ;

[0039] in, are all preset coefficients. All are preset ratios. Indicates the proportion of accidents described; The target ratio is confirmed in the piecewise ratio function using the accident ratio, and the evaluation value is calculated using the target ratio. The calculation formula is as follows: ; in, represents the evaluation value, represents the target ratio, Represents the critical value of the standard normal distribution corresponding to the preset confidence interval, Represents the half-width of the preset confidence interval.

[0040] It is understandable that the segmented ratio function is used to confirm the value of the accident ratio in the segmented ratio, and obtain the target ratio according to the value of the accident ratio in the segmented ratio. For example: the first judgment condition of the segmented ratio function is: when the accident ratio is in the range of 3% to 5%, the target ratio is 5%, and the ratio of the next batch of medical glass products that cannot be used normally due to the use accidents is determined as the target ratio. The evaluation value is calculated by the target ratio, and the evaluation value represents the number of medical glass products required to use the medical glass products for quality evaluation testing under the preset target ratio.

[0041] It should be explained that the step of obtaining the target failure time of the glass product set for evaluation includes: The target failure time is calculated based on the extracted target failure set. The calculation formula is as follows: ; in, Indicates the target fault set The accident time corresponding to the historical accident data, Indicates that the target fault set has Historical accident data, Indicates the target failure time.

[0042] It should be understood that the target failure time is an estimate of the life of a certain initial evaluation glass product when the certain initial evaluation glass product is used to store a certain medicine.

[0043] S5. Receive a consistency test instruction from the consistency test unit, and obtain one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the glass product set based on the consistency test instruction.

[0044] It should be explained that the step of obtaining one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the glass product set based on the consistency test instruction includes: Initial evaluation glass products are extracted from the evaluation glass product set in sequence, and the following operations are performed on the extracted initial evaluation glass products: Obtaining a production standard size set for an initial evaluation of a glass product, wherein the production standard size set includes a plurality of reference parameters, and the reference parameters include: a reference thickness, a reference length, and a reference diameter; Extract reference parameters from the multiple reference parameters in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted reference parameters: Acquire a production standard range based on the extracted reference parameters, wherein the production standard range corresponds to the extracted reference parameters one by one, and acquire an actual size set using the extracted reference parameters and the production standard range, wherein the actual size set includes a plurality of actual sizes; Extract actual dimensions from the actual dimension set in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted actual dimensions: If the actual dimensions in the actual dimension set are all within the production standard range, the reference consistency value is calculated using the pre-constructed consistency relationship. Otherwise, the initial evaluation glass product corresponding to the actual dimension is identified as a defective glass product. The consistency relationship is as follows: ; in, Indicates the extracted Reference consistency values ​​for reference parameters, Indicates that the actual size set includes Actual size, Indicates the actual size set Actual size; One or more consistency evaluation values ​​are obtained based on the reference consistency value.

[0045] It is understandable that the reference parameter is a preset value for manufacturing the initial evaluation glass product, for example: a glass product with a thickness of 2 mm needs to be produced. The reference thickness is the preset thickness as a manufacturing standard. The reference length is the preset length as a manufacturing standard. The reference diameter is the preset diameter as a manufacturing standard. The reference parameters can express the parameters of any position in the extracted initial evaluation glass product. The actual size set refers to the set of dimensions of the initial evaluation glass product measured at the reference parameters in practice based on the reference parameters. The actual size is the size parameter obtained by measuring the initial evaluation glass product according to the reference parameters. Optionally, the actual size set can be obtained by measuring the dimensions of multiple positions within the reference parameters and production standard ranges. Other technologies can achieve the same effect and will not be repeated here. For example: if the reference diameter is measured in a cylindrical medical glass product, and the production standard range corresponding to the reference diameter is consistent, the actual size set can be obtained by measuring the cylindrical medical glass product at multiple preset angles. The production standard range is the range actually allowed to exist calculated by using the allowable error range based on the reference parameters. For example, if the reference thickness is 1mm, and the allowable error is plus or minus 0.05mm, the allowable production range is 0.995mm to 1.05mm. When the actual size exceeds the production range, it can be determined that the extracted initial evaluation glass products do not meet the production needs. Therefore, the extracted initial evaluation glass products are marked as defective glass products. Defective glass products refer to medical glass products whose actual sizes do not meet the preset requirements.

[0046] It should be understood that for the same reference parameter in the same medical glass product, there may be different production standard ranges. For example: when the reference thickness is 2mm, due to factors such as rounded corners, the corresponding production standard ranges for the reference thickness of 2mm are: 1.98 to 2.05, 1.96 to 2.01, respectively. Therefore, obtaining the actual size set through the production standard range and reference parameters can more accurately express the size of the initial evaluation glass product under the production standard range and reference parameters. When the actual size is outside the production standard range, it is determined that the medical glass product does not meet the actual requirements in size. For example: the production standard range is: 1.98 to 2.05, and there is an actual size of 2.07 in the actual size set. When using the medical glass product, the part with the actual size of 2.07 will cause the medical glass product to fail to seal.

[0047] Further, the obtaining one or more consistency evaluation values ​​based on the reference consistency value includes: The reference consistency values ​​are respectively summarized according to the extracted reference parameters and the production standard range to obtain one or more reference consistency value sets, reference consistency value sets are sequentially extracted from the one or more reference consistency value sets, and the following operations are performed on the extracted reference consistency value sets: The consistency evaluation value is calculated based on the extracted reference consistency value set and the pre-constructed consistency evaluation relationship, where the consistency evaluation relationship is as follows: ; in, represents the consistency assessment value, For the preset coefficients, Indicates the extracted Reference parameters, Indicates that the total number of glass products retained for initial evaluation is indivual; The consistency evaluation values ​​are aggregated to obtain one or more consistency evaluation values.

[0048] It should be explained that the same reference consistency value set corresponds to the reference consistency values ​​of multiple initially evaluated glass products within the same reference parameter and production standard range. After obtaining the actual size set, the initially evaluated glass products are divided into retained initially evaluated glass products and glass products with defective dimensions by judging whether the actual dimensions in the actual size set are all within the production standard range. Therefore, the consistency evaluation value is used to indicate the corresponding dimensions of the retained initially evaluated glass products under the same reference parameter and the same production standard range. The smaller the consistency evaluation value, the better the consistency of the retained initially evaluated glass products in dimensions.

[0049] S6. Obtaining the airtightness evaluation content of the evaluation glass product set based on the airtightness test unit, and obtaining the defective ratio based on the evaluation glass product set.

[0050] Further, the obtaining of the airtightness evaluation content of the glass product set based on the airtightness test unit includes: Summarizing the initially evaluated glass products in the evaluated glass product set that are not identified as glass products with defective size to obtain a first glass product set; Initial evaluation glass products are sequentially extracted from the first glass product set, and the following operations are performed on the extracted initial evaluation glass products: Performing a sealing operation on the evaluated glass product to obtain a sealed glass product, and performing a vacuum test operation on the sealed glass product using a pre-built vacuum tester to obtain a test pressure value; Acquire an actual pressure difference value based on the test pressure value; Comparing the actual pressure difference value with a preset pressure difference threshold, if the actual pressure difference value is greater than or equal to the pressure difference threshold, marking the initially evaluated glass product as an airtight defective glass product; Otherwise, the actual pressure difference values ​​are summarized to obtain an actual pressure difference value set, and the airtightness assessment content is obtained based on the actual pressure difference value set.

[0051] It should be explained that the sealing operation refers to sealing the initial evaluation glass product. For example: the initial evaluation glass product is sealed by a bottle stopper. The sealed glass product is the initial evaluation glass product obtained after the initial evaluation glass product is sealed. Optionally, a vacuum decay tester is selected as the vacuum tester. Other methods can achieve the same effect, which will not be repeated here. The airtight evaluation content is the average of one or more actual pressure difference values ​​in the actual pressure difference value set.

[0052] It should be understood that the vacuum test operation refers to the operation of placing a sealed glass product into a vacuum tester for a vacuum decay test. The test pressure value refers to the pressure value tested by the pressure tester during the vacuum test. The actual differential pressure value is the absolute difference between the preset absolute pressure value and the test pressure value. When the actual differential pressure value is greater than or equal to the differential pressure threshold, it is determined that the atmosphere in the initially evaluated glass product has leaked into the vacuum tester. Therefore, by comparing the actual differential pressure value with the differential pressure threshold, it can be determined whether the initially evaluated glass product is an airtight defective glass product. Airtight defective glass products refer to initial glass products that are unable to be sealed or are not tightly sealed during the initial evaluation.

[0053] It should be explained that the method of obtaining the defective ratio based on the evaluated glass product set includes: Summarize defective glass products to obtain a defective glass product set, wherein the defective glass products include: defective size glass products and airtight defective glass products; The defective ratio is calculated based on the defective glass product set and the evaluated glass product set. The calculation formula is as follows: ; in, represents the number of defective glass products included in the defective glass product set, Indicates the defective ratio.

[0054] It is understandable that the defective ratio is the ratio of defective glass products detected through testing in the initial evaluation glass product set actually obtained to the initial evaluation glass product set existing in the initial evaluation glass product set. The number of initial evaluation glass products included in the initial evaluation glass product set can represent a batch of glass products corresponding to the initial evaluation glass product set. Therefore, the defective ratio can express the defective ratio of a batch of glass products corresponding to the initial evaluation glass product set. For example: the initial evaluation glass product set includes a total of 50 initial evaluation glass products. By testing the 50 initial evaluation glass products, it is found that there are 2 defective glass products among the 50 initial evaluation glass products, and the defective ratio is: 4%.

[0055] S7. Using the data feedback unit, the one or more consistency evaluation values, target failure time, defective ratio and airtight evaluation content are sent to the initiator of the glass quality evaluation instruction to achieve quality evaluation of the glass product.

[0056] For example, after Xiao Zhang conducts quality assessment testing on a batch of initial assessment glass products, he receives information from the data feedback unit, wherein the information includes: consistency assessment values ​​of the initial assessment glass products in the initial assessment glass product set in one or several dimensions, airtight assessment content of the initial assessment glass products that pass the airtight test, the proportion of defective glass products in the initial assessment glass product set in the initial assessment glass product set, and target failure time corresponding to a certain initial assessment glass product when using the initial assessment glass product to store a certain medicine.

[0057] The present invention is to solve the problem described in the background technology. The present invention receives a glass quality assessment instruction and confirms a glass quality assessment environment based on the glass quality assessment instruction, wherein the glass quality assessment environment includes: one or more medical glass products to be assessed and a quality assessment system for assessing glass quality, wherein the quality assessment system is composed of a data acquisition unit, a consistency test unit, an airtightness test unit and a data feedback unit. It can be seen that when considering the quality assessment of medical glass products in the embodiment of the present invention, the proposed quality assessment system is composed of multiple units, and each unit can realize different processing methods for medical glass products, thereby realizing the quality assessment of medical glass products. A relatively comprehensive and accurate quality assessment of glass products is provided. On this basis, the present invention obtains a historical accident set by utilizing a data acquisition unit and the extracted medical glass products, wherein the historical accident set includes multiple historical accident data, and the historical accident data is composed of accident time, accident cause, type of medical glass and medicines stored in the medical glass products. One or more target fault sets are obtained based on the historical accident set, and the historical accident set is obtained according to the type of medical glass extracted, and the historical accident set is divided into one or more target fault sets in combination with the medicines stored in the medical glass products, the type of medical glass and the cause of the accident in actual use. Furthermore, the present invention confirms the evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set, obtains the evaluation glass product set based on the evaluation quantity, and obtains the target fault time of the evaluation glass product set, wherein the evaluation glass product set includes multiple initial evaluation glass products, and the number corresponding to the multiple initial evaluation glass products is the evaluation quantity. It can be seen that after obtaining a relatively accurate target fault set, the present invention confirms the evaluation quantity that can represent the batch of medical glass products through the target fault set, and obtains the evaluation glass product set through the evaluation quantity. Then, only by evaluating the quality of the evaluation glass product set, it is possible to achieve an accurate evaluation of the batch of medical glass products, and only when the quality evaluation of the evaluation glass product set is performed, time and excessive human resources are saved. Next, the present invention receives a consistency test instruction from a consistency test unit, obtains one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the evaluation glass product set based on the consistency test instruction, obtains the airtight evaluation content of the evaluation glass product set based on the airtight test unit, and obtains the defective ratio based on the evaluation glass product set. It can be seen that the embodiment of the present invention performs multiple tests on the evaluation glass product set and obtains multiple parameters for expressing the quality evaluation of medical glass products. Therefore, the present invention can improve the accuracy of the quality evaluation of medical glass products and reduce the excessive consumption of time and human resources.

[0058] like Figure 2 FIG. 1 is a functional module diagram of a quality assessment system for medical glass products provided by an embodiment of the present invention.

[0059] The quality assessment system 100 for medical glass products of the present invention can be installed in an electronic device. According to the functions to be implemented, the quality assessment system 100 for medical glass products can include an instruction receiving and environment confirmation module 101, a historical data division module 102, a quality assessment module 103 and a quality assessment feedback module 104. The module of the present invention can also be called a unit, which refers to a series of computer program segments that can be executed by an electronic device processor and can complete fixed functions, which are stored in the memory of the electronic device.

[0060] The instruction receiving and environment confirmation module 101 is used to receive a glass quality assessment instruction and confirm a glass quality assessment environment based on the glass quality assessment instruction, wherein the glass quality assessment environment includes: one or more medical glass products to be assessed and a quality assessment system for assessing glass quality, wherein the quality assessment system is composed of a data acquisition unit, a consistency test unit, an airtightness test unit and a data feedback unit; The historical data division module 102 is used to extract medical glass products from the one or more medical glass products in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted medical glass products: Using the data acquisition unit and the extracted medical glass products to obtain a historical accident set, wherein the historical accident set includes a plurality of historical accident data, and the historical accident data is composed of accident time, accident cause, type of medical glass, and medicine stored in the medical glass products; Obtain one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set; The quality assessment module 103 is used to sequentially extract target fault sets from the one or more target fault sets, and perform the following operations on the extracted target fault sets: Determine an evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set, obtain an evaluation glass product set based on the evaluation quantity, and obtain a target fault time of the evaluation glass product set, wherein the evaluation glass product set includes a plurality of initial evaluation glass products, and the quantity corresponding to the plurality of initial evaluation glass products is the evaluation quantity; receiving a consistency test instruction from a consistency test unit, and acquiring one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the glass product set based on the consistency test instruction; Acquire the airtightness evaluation content of the evaluated glass product set based on the airtightness test unit, and acquire the defective ratio based on the evaluated glass product set; The quality assessment feedback module 104 is used to send the one or more consistency assessment values, target failure time, defective ratio and airtightness assessment content to the initiator of the glass quality assessment instruction by using the data feedback unit to achieve quality assessment of the glass product.

[0061] In detail, each module in the quality assessment system 100 for medical glass products in the embodiment of the present invention is used in the same manner as described above. Figure 1 The technical means are the same as the quality assessment method for medical glass products described in, and can produce the same technical effects, so they will not be repeated here.

[0062] like Figure 3 FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device for implementing a quality assessment method for medical glass products provided by an embodiment of the present invention.

[0063] The electronic device 1 may include a processor 10 , a memory 11 , and a bus 12 , and may also include a computer program stored in the memory 11 and executable on the processor 10 , such as a quality assessment method program for medical glass products.

[0064] The memory 11 includes at least one type of readable storage medium, including flash memory, mobile hard disk, multimedia card, card-type memory (e.g., SD or DX memory, etc.), magnetic memory, disk, optical disk, etc. In some embodiments, the memory 11 may be an internal storage unit of the electronic device 1, such as a mobile hard disk of the electronic device 1. In other embodiments, the memory 11 may also be an external storage device of the electronic device 1, such as a plug-in mobile hard disk, a smart memory card (Smart Media Card, SMC), a secure digital (SecureDigital, SD) card, a flash card (Flash Card), etc. equipped on the electronic device 1. Further, the memory 11 also includes an internal storage unit of the electronic device 1 and an external storage device. The memory 11 can not only be used to store application software and various types of data installed in the electronic device 1, such as the code of the quality assessment method program for medical glass products, but also can be used to temporarily store data that has been output or is to be output.

[0065] The processor 10 may be composed of an integrated circuit in some embodiments, for example, a single packaged integrated circuit, or a plurality of packaged integrated circuits with the same or different functions, including one or more central processing units (CPUs), microprocessors, digital processing chips, graphics processors, and combinations of various control chips, etc. The processor 10 is the control core (Control Unit) of the electronic device, and uses various interfaces and lines to connect various components of the entire electronic device, and executes various functions and processes data of the electronic device 1 by running or executing programs or modules (such as quality assessment method programs for medical glass products, etc.) stored in the memory 11, and calling data stored in the memory 11.

[0066] The bus 12 may be a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) bus or an extended industry standard architecture (EISA) bus, etc. The bus 12 may be divided into an address bus, a data bus, a control bus, etc. The bus 12 is configured to realize connection and communication between the memory 11 and at least one processor 10, etc.

[0067] Figure 3 Only an electronic device with components is shown, and those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 3 The structure shown does not constitute a limitation on the electronic device 1, and may include fewer or more components than shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or arrange the components differently.

[0068] For example, although not shown, the electronic device 1 may also include a power source (such as a battery) for supplying power to various components. Preferably, the power source may be logically connected to the at least one processor 10 through a power management device, so that the power management device can realize functions such as charging management, discharging management, and power consumption management. The power source may also include one or more DC or AC power sources, recharging devices, power failure detection circuits, power converters or inverters, power status indicators, and other arbitrary components. The electronic device 1 may also include a variety of sensors, Bluetooth modules, Wi-Fi modules, etc., which will not be repeated here.

[0069] Furthermore, the electronic device 1 may also include a network interface. Optionally, the network interface may include a wired interface and / or a wireless interface (such as a WI-FI interface, a Bluetooth interface, etc.), which is generally used to establish a communication connection between the electronic device 1 and other electronic devices.

[0070] Optionally, the electronic device 1 may further include a user interface, which may be a display, an input unit (such as a keyboard), or a standard wired interface or a wireless interface. Optionally, in some embodiments, the display may be an LED display, a liquid crystal display, a touch-sensitive liquid crystal display, and an OLED (Organic Light-Emitting Diode) touch device. The display may also be appropriately referred to as a display screen or a display unit, which is used to display information processed in the electronic device 1 and to display a visual user interface.

[0071] It should be understood that the embodiment is for illustration only and the scope of the patent application is not limited to this structure.

[0072] The quality assessment method program for medical glass products stored in the memory 11 of the electronic device 1 is a combination of multiple instructions. When running in the processor 10, it can achieve: receiving a glass quality assessment instruction, and confirming a glass quality assessment environment based on the glass quality assessment instruction, wherein the glass quality assessment environment includes: one or more medical glass products to be assessed and a quality assessment system for assessing glass quality, wherein the quality assessment system is composed of a data acquisition unit, a consistency test unit, an airtightness test unit, and a data feedback unit; Extracting medical glass products from the one or more medical glass products in sequence, and performing the following operations on the extracted medical glass products: Using the data acquisition unit and the extracted medical glass products to obtain a historical accident set, wherein the historical accident set includes a plurality of historical accident data, and the historical accident data is composed of accident time, accident cause, type of medical glass, and medicine stored in the medical glass products; Obtain one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set; Extract target fault sets from the one or more target fault sets in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted target fault sets: Determine an evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set, obtain an evaluation glass product set based on the evaluation quantity, and obtain a target fault time of the evaluation glass product set, wherein the evaluation glass product set includes a plurality of initial evaluation glass products, and the quantity corresponding to the plurality of initial evaluation glass products is the evaluation quantity; receiving a consistency test instruction from a consistency test unit, and acquiring one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the glass product set based on the consistency test instruction; Acquire the airtightness evaluation content of the evaluated glass product set based on the airtightness test unit, and acquire the defective ratio based on the evaluated glass product set; The data feedback unit is used to send the one or more consistency evaluation values, target failure time, defective ratio and airtight evaluation content to the initiator of the glass quality evaluation instruction, so as to realize the quality evaluation of the glass product.

[0073] Specifically, the specific implementation method of the processor 10 for the above instructions can refer to Figures 1 to 3 The description of the relevant steps in the corresponding embodiments will not be repeated here.

[0074] Furthermore, if the module / unit integrated in the electronic device 1 is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. The computer-readable storage medium can be volatile or non-volatile. For example, the computer-readable medium can include: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program code, a recording medium, a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a computer memory, and a read-only memory (ROM).

[0075] The present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor of an electronic device, the computer program can implement: receiving a glass quality assessment instruction, and confirming a glass quality assessment environment based on the glass quality assessment instruction, wherein the glass quality assessment environment includes: one or more medical glass products to be assessed and a quality assessment system for assessing glass quality, wherein the quality assessment system is composed of a data acquisition unit, a consistency test unit, an airtightness test unit, and a data feedback unit; Extracting medical glass products from the one or more medical glass products in sequence, and performing the following operations on the extracted medical glass products: Using the data acquisition unit and the extracted medical glass products to obtain a historical accident set, wherein the historical accident set includes a plurality of historical accident data, and the historical accident data is composed of accident time, accident cause, type of medical glass, and medicine stored in the medical glass products; Obtain one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set; Extract target fault sets from the one or more target fault sets in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted target fault sets: Determine an evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set, obtain an evaluation glass product set based on the evaluation quantity, and obtain a target fault time of the evaluation glass product set, wherein the evaluation glass product set includes a plurality of initial evaluation glass products, and the quantity corresponding to the plurality of initial evaluation glass products is the evaluation quantity; receiving a consistency test instruction from a consistency test unit, and acquiring one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the glass product set based on the consistency test instruction; Acquire the airtightness evaluation content of the evaluated glass product set based on the airtightness test unit, and acquire the defective ratio based on the evaluated glass product set; The data feedback unit is used to send the one or more consistency evaluation values, target failure time, defective ratio and airtight evaluation content to the initiator of the glass quality evaluation instruction, so as to realize the quality evaluation of the glass product.

[0076] In the several embodiments provided by the present invention, it should be understood that the disclosed devices, systems and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the system embodiments described above are only illustrative, and actual implementation may have other division methods.

[0077] The modules described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as modules may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the modules may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0078] In addition, each functional module in each embodiment of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit. The above-mentioned integrated unit may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of hardware plus software functional modules.

[0079] It is obvious to those skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to the details of the above exemplary embodiments, and that the present invention can be implemented in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics of the present invention.

[0080] In addition, it is clear that the word "comprising" does not exclude other units or steps, and the singular does not exclude the plural. Multiple units or devices stated in the system claim can also be implemented by one unit or device through software or hardware. The second and other words are used to indicate names, but not to indicate any particular order.

[0081] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the technical solution of the present invention can be modified or replaced by equivalents without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solution of the present invention.

Claims

1. A quality assessment method for medical glass products, characterized in that: The method comprises: receiving a glass quality assessment instruction, and confirming a glass quality assessment environment based on the glass quality assessment instruction, wherein the glass quality assessment environment includes: one or more medical glass products to be assessed and a quality assessment system for assessing glass quality, wherein the quality assessment system is composed of a data acquisition unit, a consistency test unit, an airtightness test unit, and a data feedback unit; Extracting medical glass products from the one or more medical glass products in sequence, and performing the following operations on the extracted medical glass products: Using the data acquisition unit and the extracted medical glass products to obtain a historical accident set, wherein the historical accident set includes a plurality of historical accident data, and the historical accident data is composed of accident time, accident cause, type of medical glass, and medicine stored in the medical glass products; Obtain one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set; Extract target fault sets from the one or more target fault sets in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted target fault sets: Determine an evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set, obtain an evaluation glass product set based on the evaluation quantity, and obtain a target fault time of the evaluation glass product set, wherein the evaluation glass product set includes a plurality of initial evaluation glass products, and the quantity corresponding to the plurality of initial evaluation glass products is the evaluation quantity; receiving a consistency test instruction from a consistency test unit, and acquiring one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the glass product set based on the consistency test instruction; Acquire the airtightness evaluation content of the evaluated glass product set based on the airtightness test unit, and acquire the defective ratio based on the evaluated glass product set; The data feedback unit is used to send the one or more consistency evaluation values, target failure time, defective ratio and airtight evaluation content to the initiator of the glass quality evaluation instruction, so as to realize the quality evaluation of the glass product.

2. The quality assessment method for medical glass products according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of acquiring one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set includes: The historical accident data are sequentially extracted from the historical accident set, and the following operations are performed on the extracted historical accident data: Acquiring reference identification information based on the extracted historical accident data, wherein the reference identification information is composed of the cause of the accident, the type of medical glass, and the medicine stored in the medical glass product; Using the reference identification information, performing an identification operation on the extracted historical accident data to obtain identified accident data; The identified accident data are respectively aggregated according to the reference identification information corresponding to the identified accident data to obtain one or more target fault sets.

3. The quality assessment method for medical glass products according to claim 2, characterized in that: The step of determining the evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set includes: The historical accident data are sequentially extracted from the target fault set, and the following operations are performed on the extracted historical accident data: Obtaining the first cause of the accident based on the extracted historical accident data and the pre-trained accident cause identification model; If the first accident cause is a usage accident cause, the extracted historical accident data is retained; If the first cause of the accident is an accidental cause, the extracted historical accident data is eliminated; Summarize the retained historical accident data to obtain a first fault set; Determine the target usage quantity according to the target fault set, and obtain the accident ratio based on the target usage quantity and the first fault set, wherein the accident ratio is the ratio of the quantity corresponding to the historical accident data in the first fault set to the target usage quantity; Get an assessment value based on the accident ratio.

4. The quality assessment method for medical glass products according to claim 3, characterized in that: The obtaining of the evaluation value based on the accident ratio includes: Get the piecewise proportional function of the accident ratio, where the piecewise proportional function is as follows: ； ； … ； in, are all preset coefficients. All are preset ratios. Indicates the proportion of accidents described; The target ratio is confirmed in the piecewise ratio function using the accident ratio, and the evaluation value is calculated using the target ratio. The calculation formula is as follows: ； in, represents the evaluation value, represents the target ratio, Represents the critical value of the standard normal distribution corresponding to the preset confidence interval, Represents the half-width of the preset confidence interval.

5. The quality assessment method for medical glass products according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of obtaining one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the glass product set based on the consistency test instruction comprises: Initial evaluation glass products are extracted from the evaluation glass product set in sequence, and the following operations are performed on the extracted initial evaluation glass products: Obtaining a production standard size set for an initial evaluation of a glass product, wherein the production standard size set includes a plurality of reference parameters, and the reference parameters include: a reference thickness, a reference length, and a reference diameter; Extract reference parameters from the multiple reference parameters in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted reference parameters: Acquire a production standard range based on the extracted reference parameters, wherein the production standard range corresponds to the extracted reference parameters one by one, and acquire an actual size set using the extracted reference parameters and the production standard range, wherein the actual size set includes a plurality of actual sizes; Extract actual dimensions from the actual dimension set in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted actual dimensions: If the actual dimensions in the actual dimension set are all within the production standard range, the reference consistency value is calculated using the pre-constructed consistency relationship. Otherwise, the initial evaluation glass product corresponding to the actual dimension is identified as a defective glass product. The consistency relationship is as follows: ； in, Indicates the extracted Reference consistency values ​​for reference parameters, Indicates that the actual size set includes Actual size, Indicates the actual size set Actual size; One or more consistency evaluation values ​​are obtained based on the reference consistency value.

6. The quality assessment method for medical glass products according to claim 5, characterized in that: The obtaining one or more consistency evaluation values ​​based on the reference consistency value comprises: The reference consistency values ​​are respectively summarized according to the extracted reference parameters and the production standard range to obtain one or more reference consistency value sets, reference consistency value sets are sequentially extracted from the one or more reference consistency value sets, and the following operations are performed on the extracted reference consistency value sets: The consistency evaluation value is calculated based on the extracted reference consistency value set and the pre-constructed consistency evaluation relationship, where the consistency evaluation relationship is as follows: ； in, represents the consistency assessment value, For the preset coefficients, Indicates the extracted Reference parameters, Indicates that the total number of glass products retained for initial evaluation is indivual; The consistency evaluation values ​​are aggregated to obtain one or more consistency evaluation values.

7. The quality assessment method for medical glass products according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of obtaining a target failure time of the glass product set for evaluation includes: The target failure time is calculated based on the extracted target failure set. The calculation formula is as follows: ； in, Indicates the target fault set The accident time corresponding to the historical accident data, Indicates that the target fault set has Historical accident data, Indicates the target failure time.

8. The quality assessment method for medical glass products according to claim 6, characterized in that: The method of obtaining the airtightness evaluation content of the glass product set based on the airtightness test unit includes: Initial evaluation glass products are sequentially extracted from the evaluation glass product set, and the following operations are performed on the extracted initial evaluation glass products: Performing a sealing operation on the evaluated glass product to obtain a sealed glass product, and performing a vacuum test operation on the sealed glass product using a pre-built vacuum tester to obtain a test pressure value; Acquire an actual pressure difference value based on the test pressure value; Comparing the actual pressure difference value with a preset pressure difference threshold, if the actual pressure difference value is greater than or equal to the pressure difference threshold, marking the initially evaluated glass product as an airtight defective glass product; Otherwise, the actual pressure difference values ​​are summarized to obtain an actual pressure difference value set, and the airtightness assessment content is obtained based on the actual pressure difference value set.

9. The quality assessment method for medical glass products according to claim 8, characterized in that: The obtaining of the defective ratio based on the evaluated glass product set comprises: Summarize defective glass products to obtain a defective glass product set, wherein the defective glass products include: defective size glass products and airtight defective glass products; The defective ratio is calculated based on the defective glass product set and the evaluated glass product set. The calculation formula is as follows: ； in, represents the number of defective glass products included in the defective glass product set, Indicates the defective ratio.

10. A quality assessment system for medical glass products, characterized in that: The system comprises: An instruction receiving and environment confirmation module, used for receiving a glass quality assessment instruction and confirming a glass quality assessment environment based on the glass quality assessment instruction, wherein the glass quality assessment environment includes: one or more medical glass products to be assessed and a quality assessment system for assessing glass quality, wherein the quality assessment system is composed of a data acquisition unit, a consistency test unit, an airtightness test unit and a data feedback unit; The historical data partitioning module is used to extract medical glass products from the one or more medical glass products in sequence, and perform the following operations on the extracted medical glass products: Using the data acquisition unit and the extracted medical glass products to obtain a historical accident set, wherein the historical accident set includes a plurality of historical accident data, and the historical accident data is composed of accident time, accident cause, type of medical glass, and medicine stored in the medical glass products; Obtain one or more target fault sets based on the historical accident set; The quality assessment module is used to sequentially extract target fault sets from the one or more target fault sets, and perform the following operations on the extracted target fault sets: Determine an evaluation quantity based on the extracted target fault set, obtain an evaluation glass product set based on the evaluation quantity, and obtain a target fault time of the evaluation glass product set, wherein the evaluation glass product set includes a plurality of initial evaluation glass products, and the quantity corresponding to the plurality of initial evaluation glass products is the evaluation quantity; receiving a consistency test instruction from a consistency test unit, and acquiring one or more consistency evaluation values ​​of the glass product set based on the consistency test instruction; Acquire the airtightness evaluation content of the evaluated glass product set based on the airtightness test unit, and acquire the defective ratio based on the evaluated glass product set; The quality assessment feedback module is used to use the data feedback unit to send the one or more consistency assessment values, target failure time, defective ratio and airtightness assessment content to the initiator of the glass quality assessment instruction to achieve quality assessment of the glass product.

Images