A method and system for evaluating seismic performance under earthquake scenarios for multiple buildings

Abstract

The present invention relates to the field of construction engineering technology, and more particularly to a method and system for evaluating seismic resistance effects in multiple building scenarios under earthquakes. The method comprises first obtaining a seismic resistance effect record based on an earthquake log, then transmitting the seismic resistance effect record to each building complex to be evaluated based on the earthquake log, and then collecting multi-source structures and environments before the evaluation based on the earthquake log when a first building scenario recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated is received based on the earthquake log. Since the first building scenario recommendation instruction is obtained for any building complex to be evaluated after it is determined based on the seismic resistance effect record that all building complexes to be evaluated have been evaluated, the method collects multi-source structures and environments before the evaluation based on the earthquake log when all building complexes to be evaluated have been evaluated. While ensuring the normal execution of the evaluation process, the consistency of the multi-source structures and environments during the evaluation process is maintained, thereby avoiding the situation where a building has multiple structures and environments before and after the evaluation.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of construction engineering technology, and in particular to a method and system for evaluating seismic effects of multiple building scenarios under earthquakes. Background Art

[0002] With the development of computer technology, in order to further improve computing power, some multi-building scene environments have emerged, that is, multiple buildings are used in the environment, and multiple buildings can use the same set of structures and environments, synchronize and share data during the work process, so as to achieve the goal of better utilizing building performance and improving the work efficiency of the building environment.

[0003] In order to achieve the goal of improving structural and environmental utilization and flexible scheduling, there is a need to evaluate buildings in the application environment. However, there is no good solution in the relevant technology for evaluating multiple buildings in a multi-building scenario environment. Summary of the Invention

[0004] To achieve the above object, the present invention provides the following technical solutions:

[0005] According to a first aspect of the present invention, the present invention claims protection for a method for evaluating seismic effects in a multi-building earthquake scenario, which is applied to a first seismic effect evaluation server, wherein the first seismic effect evaluation server is configured with an earthquake log, and the method comprises:

[0006] Obtaining a seismic effect record based on the earthquake log, the seismic effect record including seismic effects of each building complex to be evaluated in the multi-building scenario environment, the building complex to be evaluated being buildings in a multi-source processor different from a central processor;

[0007] Transmitting the earthquake resistance effect record to each of the building complexes to be evaluated based on the earthquake log;

[0008] In a state where the first building scene recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated is received based on the earthquake log, the multi-source structure and environment before the evaluation are collected based on the earthquake log, wherein the first building scene recommendation instruction is obtained by any building complex to be evaluated when it is determined that the evaluation of all building complexes to be evaluated has been completed based on the earthquake resistance effect record.

[0009] Furthermore, the method further comprises:

[0010] In a state where a second building scene recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated is received based on the earthquake log, the target multi-source structure and environment are collected and evaluated based on the earthquake log, wherein the second building scene recommendation instruction is obtained by any building complex to be evaluated when it is determined that the recommendation of all building complexes to be evaluated has been revoked based on the earthquake resistance effect record.

[0011] Furthermore, the seismic effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets a first indicator, wherein, if the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the first indicator, the evaluation process is continued based on the building complex to be evaluated, and the first indicator is that the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated are not less than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated;

[0012] The earthquake resistance effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets a second indicator, wherein, if the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the second indicator, the evaluation process based on the building complex to be evaluated is interrupted, and the second indicator is a state in which the evaluation dimension corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated is smaller than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated;

[0013] The earthquake-resistant effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets the third indicator. When the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the third indicator, a revocation recommendation process is performed based on the building complex to be evaluated. The third indicator is that there are buildings with low quality in other building complexes to be evaluated.

[0014] Furthermore, the method further comprises:

[0015] In a state where a deletion recommendation instruction transmitted by any cloud server is received based on the earthquake log, the seismic resistance effect corresponding to the target building complex to be evaluated is deleted from the seismic resistance effect record based on the earthquake log to obtain a synchronized seismic resistance effect record, where the target building complex to be evaluated is a building that is configured on the same seismic resistance effect evaluation server as the cloud server and is in a scrapped state;

[0016] The transmitting the earthquake resistance effect record to each of the building complexes to be evaluated based on the earthquake log includes:

[0017] The synchronized earthquake resistance effect records are transmitted to other building groups to be evaluated except the target building group to be evaluated based on the earthquake log.

[0018] Furthermore, the method further comprises:

[0019] In a state where a third building scenario recommendation instruction transmitted by any cloud server is received based on the earthquake log, multi-source structures and environments of a target building complex to be evaluated are collected based on the earthquake log, where the target building complex to be evaluated is a building that is configured on the same earthquake resistance effect evaluation server as the cloud server and is in a scrapped state;

[0020] The cloud server determines that the building complex to be evaluated is in a scrapped state when it fails to identify the safety value of any building complex to be evaluated in the same earthquake resistance effect evaluation server.

[0021] According to a second aspect of the present invention, the present invention claims protection for a method for evaluating seismic effects in a multi-building earthquake scenario, the method being applied to a second seismic effect evaluation server, wherein the second seismic effect evaluation server is configured with a building complex to be evaluated in a multi-source environment, wherein the building complex to be evaluated is a building in a multi-source processor distinct from a central processor, the method comprising:

[0022] For any of the building complexes to be evaluated, transmitting the seismic resistance effect of the building complex to be evaluated to the earthquake log;

[0023] receiving, based on the building complex to be evaluated, a seismic effect record transmitted from the earthquake log, wherein the seismic effect record includes the seismic effect of each building complex to be evaluated in the multi-building scene environment;

[0024] When it is determined that the evaluation of all building groups to be evaluated has been completed based on the earthquake resistance effect record of the building group to be evaluated, a first building scene recommendation instruction is transmitted to the earthquake log based on the building group to be evaluated, so that the earthquake log collects the multi-source structure and environment before the evaluation.

[0025] Furthermore, the method further comprises:

[0026] When it is determined that all the building groups to be evaluated have been revoked based on the earthquake resistance effect record, a second building scenario recommendation instruction is transmitted to the earthquake log based on the building group to be evaluated, so that the earthquake log collects the target multi-source structure and environment for evaluation;

[0027] In a state where it is determined based on the earthquake resistance effect record of the building complex to be evaluated that the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated are not less than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated, the evaluation process is continued based on the building complex to be evaluated;

[0028] When it is determined based on the earthquake resistance effect record of the building complex to be evaluated that there is an evaluation dimension corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated that is smaller than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated, interrupting the evaluation process based on the building complex to be evaluated;

[0029] In a state where it is determined based on the earthquake resistance effect record that there are buildings with low evaluation quality in other building groups to be evaluated based on the building group to be evaluated, cancellation recommendation processing is performed based on the building group to be evaluated.

[0030] Furthermore, the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is further configured with a cloud server, and the method further includes:

[0031] When it is determined by the cloud server that any one of the to-be-evaluated building complexes in the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is in a scrapped state, the cloud server transmits a deletion recommendation instruction to the earthquake log, so that the earthquake log deletes the earthquake resistance effect corresponding to the to-be-evaluated building complex from the earthquake resistance effect record based on the deletion recommendation instruction, thereby obtaining a synchronized earthquake resistance effect record;

[0032] The second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is further configured with a cloud server, and the method further includes:

[0033] When it is determined based on the cloud server that any one of the building complexes to be evaluated in the second seismic resistance effect evaluation server is in a scrapped state, the cloud server transmits a third building scene recommendation instruction to the earthquake log, so that the earthquake log collects the multi-source structure and environment of the building complex to be evaluated based on the third building scene recommendation instruction.

[0034] Furthermore, the method further comprises:

[0035] In a state in which the cloud server fails to identify the safety value of any building complex to be evaluated, it is determined that the building complex to be evaluated is in a scrapped state.

[0036] According to a third aspect of the present invention, the present invention claims protection for a seismic effect evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquake conditions, comprising:

[0037] a memory having a computer environment stored thereon;

[0038] A processor is configured to execute the computer environment in the memory to implement the steps of the method.

[0039] The present invention relates to the field of construction engineering technology, and more particularly to a method and system for evaluating seismic resistance effects in multiple building scenarios under earthquakes. The method comprises first obtaining a seismic resistance effect record based on an earthquake log, then transmitting the seismic resistance effect record to each building complex to be evaluated based on the earthquake log, and then collecting multi-source structures and environments before the evaluation based on the earthquake log when a first building scenario recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated is received based on the earthquake log. Since the first building scenario recommendation instruction is obtained for any building complex to be evaluated after it is determined based on the seismic resistance effect record that all building complexes to be evaluated have been evaluated, the method collects multi-source structures and environments before the evaluation based on the earthquake log when all building complexes to be evaluated have been evaluated. While ensuring the normal execution of the evaluation process, the consistency of the multi-source structures and environments during the evaluation process is maintained, thereby avoiding the situation where a building has multiple structures and environments before and after the evaluation. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0040] Figure 1 A flowchart of a method for evaluating seismic performance in multiple building scenarios under earthquake conditions, as claimed in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0041] Figure 2 A second flow chart of a method for evaluating seismic effects of multiple building scenarios under earthquake conditions, as claimed in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0042] Figure 3 A structural module diagram of a seismic effect evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquake conditions, as claimed in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0043] Figure 4 A second structural module diagram of a seismic resistance evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquakes, as claimed in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0044] The following will clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field based on the embodiments of the present invention without making any creative efforts shall fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0045] The terms "first," "second," and "third" in this disclosure are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of the technical features indicated. Therefore, features specified as "first," "second," or "third" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one of such features. In the description of this disclosure, "plurality" means at least two, for example, two, three, etc., unless otherwise specifically defined. All directional indications (such as up, down, left, right, front, back, etc.) in the embodiments of this disclosure are intended only to illustrate the relative positional relationships and motion states of various components in a specific posture (as shown in the accompanying drawings). If the specific posture changes, the directional indications will also change accordingly. Furthermore, the terms "including," "having," and any variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions. For example, a process, method, system, product, or apparatus comprising a series of steps or elements is not limited to the listed steps or elements but may optionally include steps or elements not listed, or may optionally include other steps or elements inherent to such process, method, product, or apparatus.

[0046] References herein to "embodiments" mean that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments may be included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. The appearance of this phrase in various places in the specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, nor does it constitute a separate or alternative embodiment that is mutually exclusive of other embodiments. It is understood, both explicitly and implicitly, by those skilled in the art that the embodiments described herein may be combined with other embodiments.

[0047] In the disclosed embodiments, a multi-building scene environment includes multiple buildings configured in a multi-source processor. The multi-source processor can be a multi-source processor in the same building scene or a multi-source processor in different building scenes. Furthermore, a multi-source processor can be configured to host one or more buildings in the multi-building scene environment.

[0048] In an implementation environment shown in an embodiment of the present invention, a multi-building scene environment includes four buildings configured in a multi-source processor, namely building 1, building 2, building 3 and building 4, wherein building 1 and building 2 are configured in building scene 1, and building 3 and building 4 are configured in building scene 2. There is no limitation on whether building 1 and building 2 are configured in the same multi-source processor in building scene 1, and there is no limitation on whether building 3 and building 4 are configured in the same multi-source processor in building scene 2.

[0049] In addition, in the embodiment of the present disclosure, each building configured in the multi-source processor can include a security value unit, an evaluation unit, and a communication unit. Building 1, Building 2, Building 3, and Building 4 respectively include a security value unit, an evaluation unit, and a communication unit.

[0050] The safety value unit in the building is used to maintain the safety value with the cloud server in the same building scene to ensure the correct handling when the building is abnormally scrapped.

[0051] An evaluation unit within a building, used to manage the evaluation process and seismic performance within the building.

[0052] The communication unit in the building is used to communicate with the cloud server to transmit structural and environmental management messages, as well as evaluation messages.

[0053] In addition, in the disclosed embodiments, each building scene can also be configured with a cloud server. This cloud server manages the buildings within the corresponding building scene, connects the user's buildings to the earthquake log, and handles exceptions when the user's buildings experience anomalies. The cloud server includes a building management unit, a communication unit, an evaluation management unit, and a structure and environment management unit. Building Scene 1 and Building Scene 2 each include a cloud server, each of which includes a building management unit, a communication unit, an evaluation management unit, and a structure and environment management unit.

[0054] The building management unit in the cloud server is used to monitor the safety value of user buildings and perceive the scrap status of user buildings.

[0055] The communication unit in the cloud server is used to communicate with the user building and earthquake log to realize information transmission between the two. At the same time, it is also responsible for transmitting the cloud server-related processing to the user building or earthquake log.

[0056] The evaluation management unit in the cloud server synchronizes the seismic performance of user buildings with the earthquake log. When a building is decommissioned, a deletion recommendation is sent to the earthquake log to clear the seismic performance of the current building. After clearing, the seismic performance of the building will not be synchronized with other evaluated buildings, thus preventing healthy buildings from being affected by the decommissioned building.

[0057] The structure and environment management unit in the cloud server is used to forward the structure and environment management recommendation instructions of the user building, such as the first building scene recommendation instruction and the second building scene recommendation instruction, and when the user building is abnormally scrapped, transmit the third building scene recommendation instruction of the multi-source structure and environment of the building to the earthquake log.

[0058] Furthermore, in the disclosed embodiments, an earthquake log can be configured in any earthquake resistance evaluation server, including building scene 1, building scene 2, or other earthquake resistance evaluation servers. For example, an earthquake log can be configured in earthquake resistance evaluation server 3. The earthquake log can include a structure and environment management unit, an evaluation management unit, and a communication unit.

[0059] The structure and environment management unit in the earthquake log is used to manage the multi-source structure and environment during the evaluation process. When an evaluation is initiated, the target structure and environment are pre-assigned. If the evaluation is high-quality, the first building scenario recommendation command transmitted by the user building is used to replace the source building scenario before the evaluation. If the evaluation is low-quality, the second building scenario recommendation command transmitted by the user building is used to replace the target building scenario before the evaluation. This ensures that a group of buildings only has one copy of the multi-source structure and environment before and after the evaluation, ensuring consistent structure and environment management within the cluster.

[0060] The evaluation management unit in the earthquake log is used to manage the global earthquake resistance effect. In addition, it can also receive the building's scrapping signal and synchronize the earthquake resistance effect record.

[0061] The communication unit in the earthquake log is used to communicate with the resident cloud server on the building scene, so as to achieve information connectivity, obtain recommended instructions such as application and collection of structures and environments, as well as building scrapping signals, and receive synchronous recommended instructions for earthquake resistance effects.

[0062] like Figure 1 The flowchart of a method for evaluating the seismic effect of multiple buildings under earthquake scenarios is shown based on an exemplary embodiment. The method can be applied to a first seismic effect evaluation server equipped with an earthquake log, such as Figure 1 As shown, the method includes the following steps:

[0063] In step S210, earthquake resistance effect records are obtained based on earthquake logs.

[0064] The earthquake resistance effect record includes the earthquake resistance effects of each building complex to be evaluated in a multi-building scene environment, and the building complex to be evaluated is a building in a multi-source processor different from the central processor.

[0065] In the embodiment of the present disclosure, the building complex to be evaluated can be understood as the buildings to be evaluated in the multi-source processors different from the central processor in a multi-building scene environment.

[0066] In the disclosed embodiments, the earthquake resistance evaluation server configured for the building complex to be evaluated can be understood as the second earthquake resistance evaluation server. In some embodiments, the second earthquake resistance evaluation server can also be configured with a cloud server. It should be noted that the first earthquake resistance evaluation server and the second earthquake resistance evaluation server can be the same earthquake resistance evaluation server.

[0067] In some embodiments, the building complexes to be evaluated in the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server can execute an evaluation process in response to an evaluation instruction. During the evaluation process, each building complex to be evaluated can periodically transmit its own earthquake resistance effect to the earthquake log in the first earthquake resistance effect evaluation server. That is, the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server can transmit the earthquake resistance effect of each building complex to be evaluated to the earthquake log in the first earthquake resistance effect evaluation server based on each building complex to be evaluated included in the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server. Thus, the earthquake log in the first earthquake resistance effect evaluation server can obtain the earthquake resistance effect corresponding to each building complex to be evaluated, and obtain the earthquake resistance effect record based on the earthquake resistance effect corresponding to each building complex to be evaluated. That is, the first earthquake resistance effect evaluation server can obtain the earthquake resistance effect record based on the earthquake log.

[0068] In some embodiments, under normal evaluation conditions, the seismic resistance effect can be determined based on the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated. For example, when the evaluation begins, the corresponding seismic resistance effect is 0; when the evaluation dimension value is 58%, the corresponding seismic resistance effect is 58; and when the evaluation is high quality, that is, the evaluation dimension value is 100%, the seismic resistance effect is 100. Furthermore, the seismic resistance effect can also include two states: low quality evaluation and revocation of high quality recommendation. For example, when the evaluation is low quality, the seismic resistance effect becomes -1, and the revocation of the recommendation is executed after the low quality evaluation. When the high quality recommendation is revoked, the seismic resistance effect is -100.

[0069] In some embodiments, based on the above content, the building complex to be evaluated can transmit the earthquake resistance effect of the building complex to be evaluated to the earthquake log based on the cloud server in the same second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server. For details, please refer to the above embodiment.

[0070] In step S220, the earthquake resistance effect record is transmitted to each building complex to be evaluated based on the earthquake log.

[0071] In the embodiment of the present disclosure, after obtaining the seismic effect record, the earthquake log can transmit the seismic effect record to each building complex to be evaluated, that is, the first seismic effect evaluation server can transmit the seismic effect record to each building complex to be evaluated based on the earthquake log, so that each building complex to be evaluated can receive the seismic effect record transmitted by the earthquake log, that is, the second seismic effect evaluation server can receive the seismic effect record transmitted by the earthquake log based on the building complex to be evaluated.

[0072] In some embodiments, as can be seen from the above content, the earthquake log can be transmitted from the cloud server in the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server to the building complex to be evaluated in the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server.

[0073] In step S230, when a first building scene recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated is received based on the earthquake log, multi-source structures and environments before evaluation are collected based on the earthquake log.

[0074] The first building scene recommendation instruction is obtained by any building complex to be evaluated when it is determined based on the earthquake resistance effect records that all building complexes to be evaluated have been evaluated.

[0075] The multi-source structure and environment can be considered as the structure and environment allocated to the building complex to be evaluated for scheduling. The target multi-source structure and environment can be considered as the structure and environment allocated to the evaluated building for scheduling.

[0076] In the disclosed embodiment, after receiving the seismic effect record, each building complex to be evaluated can obtain the seismic effects of other building complexes to be evaluated except itself based on the seismic effect record. For any building complex to be evaluated, if the building complex to be evaluated finds that the evaluation of other building complexes to be evaluated has been completed, and after further obtaining its own seismic effect, it finds that its own evaluation has also been completed, then the building complex to be evaluated can transmit the first building scene recommendation instruction to the earthquake log to indicate that the evaluation of all building complexes to be evaluated has been completed. Thereby, the earthquake log can receive the first structure and environment recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated, and based on the first structure and environment recommendation instruction, collect the multi-source structure and environment before the evaluation, so as to avoid the building complex to be evaluated continuing to have multi-source structure and environment after the high-quality evaluation.

[0077] Using the above method, a seismic effect record is first obtained based on the earthquake log, and then the seismic effect record is transmitted to each building complex to be evaluated based on the earthquake log. Then, when the first building scenario recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated is received based on the earthquake log, the multi-source structure and environment before the evaluation can be collected based on the earthquake log. Since the first building scenario recommendation instruction is obtained for any building complex to be evaluated after it is determined based on the seismic effect record that all building complexes to be evaluated have been evaluated, the multi-source structure and environment before the evaluation can be collected based on the earthquake log after all building complexes to be evaluated have been evaluated. This ensures the normal execution of the evaluation process while maintaining the consistency of the multi-source structure and environment during the evaluation process, avoiding the situation where a building has multiple structures and environments before and after the evaluation.

[0078] In some implementations, the method of the embodiment of the present disclosure may further include the following steps:

[0079] In a state where a second building scene recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated is received based on the earthquake log, the target multi-source structure and environment to be evaluated are collected based on the earthquake log, wherein the second building scene recommendation instruction is obtained by any building complex to be evaluated when it is determined that all the building complexes to be evaluated have withdrawn the recommendation based on the earthquake resistance effect record.

[0080] In the disclosed embodiment, after receiving the seismic effect record, each building complex to be evaluated can obtain the seismic effects of other building complexes to be evaluated except itself. For any building complex to be evaluated, if the building complex to be evaluated finds that the recommendation of other building complexes to be evaluated has been withdrawn, and after further obtaining its own seismic effect, it finds that its recommendation has been withdrawn, then the building complex to be evaluated can transmit a second building scene recommendation instruction to the earthquake log to indicate that the recommendation of all building complexes to be evaluated has been withdrawn. Thus, the earthquake log can receive the second structure and environment recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated, and based on the second structure and environment recommendation instruction, collect the target multi-source structure and environment for evaluation, so as to avoid the building complex to be evaluated from continuing to have the target multi-source structure and environment after the evaluation is of low quality and the recommendation of high quality is withdrawn.

[0081] In addition, in some embodiments, after receiving the seismic resistance effect record, each building complex to be evaluated can obtain the seismic resistance effect of other building complexes to be evaluated except itself based on the seismic resistance effect record. For any building complex to be evaluated, if the building complex to be evaluated finds that the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated are not less than its own evaluation dimension, it indicates that the other building complexes to be evaluated have reached the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated itself, and the building complex to be evaluated can continue to perform the evaluation process.

[0082] Therefore, in some embodiments, the seismic effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets the first indicator, wherein, when the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the first indicator, the evaluation process is continued based on the building complex to be evaluated, and the first indicator is that the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated are not less than the evaluation dimensions of the building complex to be evaluated.

[0083] In addition, in some embodiments, after receiving the seismic resistance effect record, each building complex to be evaluated can obtain the seismic resistance effect of other building complexes to be evaluated except itself based on the seismic resistance effect record. For any building complex to be evaluated, if the building complex to be evaluated finds that the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated are smaller than the evaluation dimensions of the building complex to be evaluated itself, it indicates that there are still other building complexes to be evaluated that have not reached the evaluation dimensions of the building complex to be evaluated itself. The building complex to be evaluated can interrupt the evaluation process and wait.

[0084] Therefore, in some embodiments, the seismic effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets the second indicator, wherein, when the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the second indicator, the evaluation process based on the building complex to be evaluated is interrupted, and the second indicator is a state in which the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated are smaller than the evaluation dimensions of the building complex to be evaluated.

[0085] In some embodiments, for any building complex to be evaluated, the minimum value of the evaluation dimension can be screened out from the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated. If the minimum value of the evaluation dimension is smaller than the evaluation dimension corresponding to the building complex to be evaluated, the building complex to be evaluated can determine that there is a state in the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated that is smaller than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated itself.

[0086] In addition, after receiving the seismic resistance effect record, each building complex to be evaluated can obtain the seismic resistance effect of other building complexes to be evaluated except itself based on the seismic resistance effect record. For any building complex to be evaluated, if the building complex to be evaluated finds that other building complexes to be evaluated have low-quality evaluations, then in order to avoid the situation where some buildings are evaluated with high quality and some buildings are evaluated with low quality, the building complex to be evaluated can execute the revocation recommendation process. In this way, all building complexes to be evaluated can execute the revocation recommendation process to ensure the consistency of the evaluation.

[0087] Therefore, in some embodiments, the seismic effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets the third indicator, wherein, when the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the third indicator, a revocation recommendation process is performed based on the building complex to be evaluated, and the third indicator is that there are buildings with low quality evaluations in other building complexes to be evaluated.

[0088] By adopting the above method, based on the integration of seismic effect control and multi-source structure and environment management in the process of multi-building scenario environmental evaluation, a coordinated evaluation of all the building complexes to be evaluated is achieved, the evaluation synchronization is guaranteed, and the consistency of multi-source structure and environment is maintained, avoiding the situation where the building has multiple structures and environments before and after the evaluation, and effectively supporting the seismic effect evaluation under earthquakes in multiple building scenarios.

[0089] In some embodiments, in combination with the foregoing content, it can be seen that a cloud server may be further configured in the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server. In this state, the method of the embodiment of the present disclosure may further include the following steps:

[0090] When a deletion recommendation instruction is received from any cloud server based on the earthquake log, the seismic effect corresponding to the target building complex to be evaluated is deleted from the seismic effect record based on the earthquake log to obtain a synchronized seismic effect record. The target building complex to be evaluated is a building that is configured on the same seismic effect evaluation server as the cloud server and is in a scrapped state.

[0091] Accordingly, transmitting the earthquake resistance effect records to each building complex to be evaluated based on the earthquake log may include the following steps:

[0092] Based on the earthquake log, synchronized earthquake resistance effect records are transmitted to other building groups to be evaluated except the target building group to be evaluated.

[0093] In the disclosed embodiment, the cloud server in each second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server can monitor whether there is a building complex to be evaluated (i.e., a target building complex to be evaluated) in a scrapped state in the same earthquake resistance effect evaluation server. If a building complex to be evaluated in a second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is in a scrapped state, the cloud server in the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server can obtain a deletion recommendation instruction and transmit the deletion recommendation instruction to the earthquake log. Thus, based on the deletion recommendation instruction, the earthquake log can delete the earthquake resistance effect corresponding to the target building complex to be evaluated from the earthquake resistance effect record to obtain a synchronized earthquake resistance effect record. Furthermore, when the subsequent earthquake log transmits the earthquake resistance effect record to other building complexes to be evaluated (i.e., each building complex to be evaluated that is not in a scrapped state) excluding the target building complex to be evaluated, it can transmit the synchronized earthquake resistance effect record.

[0094] In some embodiments, when a building complex to be evaluated in the second earthquake resistance evaluation server is decommissioned, its safety value ceases. Thus, if the cloud server fails to identify the safety value of any building complex to be evaluated in the same earthquake resistance evaluation server, it can determine that the building complex to be evaluated is decommissioned and becomes the target building complex to be evaluated.

[0095] In some embodiments, the cloud server may determine whether the building complex to be evaluated is in a scrapped state based on the building management unit.

[0096] By adopting the above method, it is possible to avoid the normal building complex to be evaluated from being affected by the scrapped buildings and maintain the stability of the evaluation.

[0097] In some embodiments, in combination with the foregoing content, it can be seen that a cloud server may be further configured in the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server. In this state, the method of the embodiment of the present disclosure may further include the following steps:

[0098] In a state where a third building scenario recommendation instruction is received from any cloud server based on an earthquake log, the multi-source structure and environment of the target building complex to be evaluated are collected based on the earthquake log. The target building complex to be evaluated is a building that is configured on the same earthquake resistance evaluation server as the cloud server and is in a scrapped state.

[0099] In the disclosed embodiment, the cloud server in each second seismic effect evaluation server can monitor whether there is a building complex to be evaluated (i.e., a target building complex to be evaluated) in a scrapped state in the same seismic effect evaluation server. If a building complex to be evaluated in a second seismic effect evaluation server is in a scrapped state, the cloud server in the second seismic effect evaluation server can obtain a third building scene recommendation instruction and transmit the third building scene recommendation instruction to the earthquake log. Thus, the earthquake log can collect the multi-source structure and environment of the target building complex to be evaluated based on the third building scene recommendation instruction.

[0100] By adopting the above method, when a building is scrapped, its multi-source structure and environment can be collected in time to save the structure and environment.

[0101] like Figure 2 The flowchart of a method for evaluating the seismic effect of multiple buildings under earthquake scenarios is shown based on an exemplary embodiment. The method can be applied to a second seismic effect evaluation server configured with a building group to be evaluated. The building group to be evaluated is a building in a multi-source processor different from the central processor, such as Figure 2 As shown, the method includes the following steps:

[0102] In step S310, for any building complex to be evaluated, the seismic resistance effect of the building complex to be evaluated is transmitted to the earthquake log.

[0103] In step S320, the earthquake resistance effect record transmitted by the earthquake log is received based on the building complex to be evaluated.

[0104] Among them, the seismic effect records include the seismic effects of each building complex to be evaluated in a multi-building scenario environment.

[0105] In step S330, when it is determined that all building groups to be evaluated have been evaluated based on the earthquake resistance effect records of the building group to be evaluated, a first building scene recommendation instruction is transmitted to the earthquake log based on the building group to be evaluated, so that the earthquake log collects the multi-source structure and environment before the evaluation.

[0106] The detailed description of steps S310-S330 can refer to the above embodiment and will not be repeated here.

[0107] In some implementations, the method of the embodiment of the present disclosure may further include the following steps:

[0108] When it is determined that all recommendations for the building complex to be evaluated have been revoked based on the earthquake resistance effect records of the building complex to be evaluated, a second building scene recommendation instruction is transmitted to the earthquake log based on the building complex to be evaluated, so that the earthquake log collects the target multi-source structure and environment for evaluation.

[0109] In some implementations, the method of the embodiment of the present disclosure may further include the following steps:

[0110] In a state where it is determined based on the earthquake resistance effect records of the building complex to be evaluated that the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated are not less than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated, the evaluation process is continued based on the building complex to be evaluated;

[0111] When it is determined based on the earthquake resistance effect records of the building complex to be evaluated that there is an evaluation dimension corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated that is smaller than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated, the evaluation process based on the building complex to be evaluated is interrupted;

[0112] In a state where it is determined based on the earthquake resistance effect record of the building complex to be evaluated that there are buildings with low evaluation quality in other building complexes to be evaluated, cancellation recommendation processing is performed based on the building complex to be evaluated.

[0113] In some implementations, the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is further configured with a cloud server. In this state, the method of the embodiment of the present disclosure may further include the following steps:

[0114] When the cloud server determines that any building complex to be evaluated in the second seismic resistance effect evaluation server is in a scrapped state, the cloud server transmits a deletion recommendation instruction to the earthquake log, so that the earthquake log deletes the seismic resistance effect corresponding to the building complex to be evaluated from the seismic resistance effect record based on the deletion recommendation instruction, and obtains a synchronized seismic resistance effect record.

[0115] In some implementations, the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is further configured with a cloud server. In this state, the method of the embodiment of the present disclosure may further include the following steps:

[0116] When it is determined based on the cloud server that any one of the building complexes to be evaluated in the second seismic effect evaluation server is in a scrapped state, the cloud server transmits a third building scene recommendation instruction to the earthquake log, so that the earthquake log collects the multi-source structure and environment of the building complex to be evaluated based on the third building scene recommendation instruction.

[0117] In some implementations, the method of the embodiment of the present disclosure may further include the following steps:

[0118] In a state where the cloud server fails to identify the safety value of any building complex to be evaluated, it is determined that the building complex to be evaluated is in a scrapped state.

[0119] The detailed description of the above embodiment can refer to the aforementioned embodiment and will not be repeated here.

[0120] The following is a detailed description of the evaluation process of a building complex to be evaluated from the perspective of the building complex to be evaluated:

[0121] Step S401: periodically transmit its own earthquake resistance effect to the earthquake log, and receive the earthquake resistance effect record transmitted by the earthquake log.

[0122] Step S402, determine whether all the buildings to be evaluated are evaluated normally, if so, execute step S403, otherwise execute step S406.

[0123] Step S403, determining whether there is a state in the evaluation dimension corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated that is smaller than the evaluation dimension corresponding to the building complex to be evaluated; if so, executing step S404; otherwise, executing step S405.

[0124] Step S404: interrupt the evaluation process and wait for the next anti-seismic effect transmission.

[0125] Step S405: Continue the evaluation process and wait for the next anti-seismic effect transmission.

[0126] Step S406 : If the earthquake resistance effect of the synchronization unit itself is evaluated as low quality, the recommendation cancellation process is executed.

[0127] Step S407: when the evaluation is of high quality, the earthquake-resistant effect indicating high quality is transmitted to the earthquake log; when the revocation recommendation is completed, the earthquake-resistant effect indicating completion of the revocation recommendation is transmitted to the earthquake log.

[0128] Figure 3 The present invention is a structural module diagram of a seismic effect evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquakes based on an exemplary embodiment. The seismic effect evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquakes can be applied to a first seismic effect evaluation server, which is equipped with an earthquake log, such as Figure 3 As shown, the seismic effect evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquakes may include:

[0129] An output unit 310 is configured to obtain a seismic resistance effect record based on the earthquake log, wherein the seismic resistance effect record includes seismic resistance effects of each building complex to be evaluated in the multi-building scenario environment, where the building complex to be evaluated is a building in a multi-source processor different from a central processor;

[0130] A first transmission unit 320 is configured to transmit the earthquake resistance effect record to each of the buildings to be evaluated based on the earthquake log;

[0131] The first acquisition unit 330 is used to collect multi-source structures and environments before evaluation based on the earthquake log when a first building scene recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated is received based on the earthquake log, wherein the first building scene recommendation instruction is obtained by any building complex to be evaluated when it is determined that the evaluation of all building complexes to be evaluated has been completed based on the earthquake resistance effect record.

[0132] In some embodiments, the seismic performance evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquake conditions may further include:

[0133] The second acquisition unit is used to collect and evaluate the target multi-source structure and environment based on the earthquake log when a second building scene recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated is received based on the earthquake log, wherein the second building scene recommendation instruction is obtained by any building complex to be evaluated when it is determined that the recommendation of all building complexes to be evaluated has been revoked based on the earthquake resistance effect record.

[0134] In some embodiments, the seismic effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets a first indicator, wherein, if the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the first indicator, the evaluation process is continued based on the building complex to be evaluated, and the first indicator is that the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated are not less than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated;

[0135] The earthquake resistance effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets a second indicator, wherein, if the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the second indicator, the evaluation process based on the building complex to be evaluated is interrupted, and the second indicator is a state in which the evaluation dimension corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated is smaller than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated;

[0136] The earthquake-resistant effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets the third indicator. When the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the third indicator, a revocation recommendation process is performed based on the building complex to be evaluated. The third indicator is that there are buildings with low quality in other building complexes to be evaluated.

[0137] In some embodiments, the seismic performance evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquake conditions may further include:

[0138] The deletion unit is used to delete the seismic effect corresponding to the target building complex to be evaluated from the seismic effect record based on the earthquake log when a deletion recommendation instruction transmitted by any cloud server is received based on the earthquake log, so as to obtain a synchronized seismic effect record. The target building complex to be evaluated is a building that is configured on the same seismic effect evaluation server as the cloud server and is in a scrapped state.

[0139] Correspondingly, the first transmission unit 320 is further configured to transmit the synchronized earthquake resistance effect records to other building complexes to be evaluated except the target building complex to be evaluated based on the earthquake log.

[0140] In some embodiments, the seismic performance evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquake conditions may further include:

[0141] The third acquisition unit is used to collect the multi-source structure and environment of the target building complex to be evaluated based on the earthquake log when a third building scene recommendation instruction transmitted by any cloud server is received based on the earthquake log. The target building complex to be evaluated is a building that is configured on the same earthquake resistance effect evaluation server as the cloud server and is in a scrapped state.

[0142] In some embodiments, the cloud server determines that the building complex to be evaluated is in a scrapped state when the cloud server fails to identify the safety value of any building complex to be evaluated in the same earthquake resistance effect evaluation server.

[0143] Figure 4 The present invention is a structural module diagram of a seismic effect evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquakes based on an exemplary embodiment. The seismic effect evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquakes can be applied to a second seismic effect evaluation server. The second seismic effect evaluation server is configured with a building group to be evaluated. The building group to be evaluated is a building in a multi-source processor different from a central processor, such as Figure 4 As shown, the seismic effect evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquakes may include:

[0144] The second transmission unit 410 is configured to transmit, for any of the buildings to be evaluated, the seismic resistance effect of the building to be evaluated to the earthquake log based on the building to be evaluated;

[0145] A receiving unit 420 is configured to receive, based on the building complex to be evaluated, a seismic effect record transmitted from the earthquake log, wherein the seismic effect record includes seismic effects of each building complex to be evaluated in the multi-building scenario environment;

[0146] The third transmission unit 430 is used to transmit a first building scene recommendation instruction to the earthquake log based on the building complex to be evaluated when it is determined that all the building complexes to be evaluated have been evaluated based on the earthquake resistance effect record, so that the earthquake log collects the multi-source structure and environment before the evaluation.

[0147] In some embodiments, the seismic performance evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquake conditions may further include:

[0148] The fourth transmission unit is used to transmit a second building scene recommendation instruction to the earthquake log based on the building complex to be evaluated when it is determined that all the building complexes to be evaluated have been revoked based on the earthquake resistance effect record, so that the earthquake log collects the target multi-source structure and environment for evaluation.

[0149] In some embodiments, the seismic performance evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquake conditions may further include:

[0150] The first determination unit is used to continue the evaluation process based on the building complex to be evaluated in a state where it is determined based on the building complex to be evaluated based on the earthquake-resistant effect record that the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated are not less than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated; and to interrupt the evaluation process based on the building complex to be evaluated in a state where it is determined based on the building complex to be evaluated based on the earthquake-resistant effect record that there is an evaluation dimension corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated that is less than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated; and to perform the revocation recommendation process based on the building complex to be evaluated in a state where it is determined based on the building complex to be evaluated based on the earthquake-resistant effect record that there are buildings with low evaluation quality among other building complexes to be evaluated.

[0151] In some embodiments, the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is further configured with a cloud server, and the earthquake resistance effect evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquakes may further include:

[0152] The fifth transmission unit is used to transmit a deletion recommendation instruction to the earthquake log based on the cloud server when it is determined based on the cloud server that any one of the building complexes to be evaluated in the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is in a scrapped state, so that the earthquake log deletes the earthquake resistance effect corresponding to the building complex to be evaluated from the earthquake resistance effect record based on the deletion recommendation instruction, and obtains a synchronized earthquake resistance effect record.

[0153] In some embodiments, the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is further configured with a cloud server, and the earthquake resistance effect evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquakes may further include:

[0154] The sixth transmission unit is used to transmit a third building scene recommendation instruction to the earthquake log based on the cloud server when it is determined based on the cloud server that any one of the building complexes to be evaluated in the second seismic resistance effect evaluation server is in a scrapped state, so that the earthquake log collects the multi-source structure and environment of the building complex to be evaluated based on the third building scene recommendation instruction.

[0155] In some embodiments, the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is further configured with a cloud server, and the earthquake resistance effect evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquakes may further include:

[0156] The second determining unit is configured to determine that the building complex to be evaluated is in a scrapped state based on a state in which the cloud server fails to identify the safety value of any building complex to be evaluated.

[0157] Regarding the system in the above embodiment, the specific manner in which each unit performs processing has been described in detail in the embodiment of the method, and will not be elaborated here.

[0158] In the several embodiments provided by the present invention, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, systems and methods can be implemented based on other methods. For example, the system embodiments described above are merely illustrative. For example, the division of units is only a logical function division. In actual implementation, there may be other division methods, such as multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. In addition, the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be based on some interfaces, indirect coupling or communication connection of systems or units, which can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.

[0159] In addition, the functional units in the various embodiments of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit. The above-mentioned integrated units may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional units. The above is only an embodiment of the present invention and does not limit the patent scope of the present invention. Any equivalent structure or equivalent process transformation made using the contents of the present invention specification and drawings, or directly or indirectly applied in other related technical fields, are also included in the patent protection scope of the present invention.

[0160] The above detailed description of the specific embodiments of the invention is intended to be illustrative only, and the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described above. For those skilled in the art, any equivalent modifications or substitutions to the invention are also within the scope of the present invention. Therefore, equivalent changes, modifications, and improvements made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention are also encompassed within the scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the seismic performance of multiple buildings under earthquake scenarios, characterized in that: Applied to a first earthquake resistance effect evaluation server, wherein the first earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is configured with an earthquake log, the method includes: Obtaining a seismic effect record based on the earthquake log, the seismic effect record including seismic effects of each building complex to be evaluated in the multi-building scenario environment, the building complex to be evaluated being buildings in a multi-source processor different from a central processor; Transmitting the earthquake resistance effect record to each of the building complexes to be evaluated based on the earthquake log; In a state where a first building scenario recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated is received based on the earthquake log, collecting multi-source structures and environments before evaluation based on the earthquake log, wherein the first building scenario recommendation instruction is obtained by any building complex to be evaluated after it is determined based on the earthquake resistance effect record that all building complexes to be evaluated have been evaluated; The seismic effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets the first indicator, wherein, if the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the first indicator, the evaluation process is continued based on the building complex to be evaluated, and the first indicator is that the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated are not less than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated; The earthquake resistance effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets a second indicator, wherein, if the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the second indicator, the evaluation process based on the building complex to be evaluated is interrupted, and the second indicator is a state in which the evaluation dimension corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated is smaller than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated; The earthquake-resistant effect record is used to determine whether any building complex to be evaluated meets the third indicator. When the building complex to be evaluated is determined to meet the third indicator, a revocation recommendation process is performed based on the building complex to be evaluated. The third indicator is that there are buildings with low quality in other building complexes to be evaluated.

2. The method for evaluating the seismic performance of multiple buildings under earthquake scenarios according to claim 1, wherein: The method further comprises: In a state where a second building scene recommendation instruction transmitted by the building complex to be evaluated is received based on the earthquake log, the target multi-source structure and environment are collected and evaluated based on the earthquake log, wherein the second building scene recommendation instruction is obtained by any building complex to be evaluated when it is determined that the recommendation of all building complexes to be evaluated has been revoked based on the earthquake resistance effect record.

3. The method for evaluating the seismic performance of multiple buildings under earthquake scenarios according to claim 1, wherein: The method further comprises: In a state where a deletion recommendation instruction transmitted by any cloud server is received based on the earthquake log, the seismic resistance effect corresponding to the target building complex to be evaluated is deleted from the seismic resistance effect record based on the earthquake log to obtain a synchronized seismic resistance effect record, where the target building complex to be evaluated is a building that is configured on the same seismic resistance effect evaluation server as the cloud server and is in a scrapped state; The transmitting the earthquake resistance effect record to each of the to-be-evaluated building complexes based on the earthquake log comprises: The synchronized earthquake resistance effect records are transmitted to other building groups to be evaluated except the target building group to be evaluated based on the earthquake log.

4. The method for evaluating seismic performance of multiple buildings under earthquake scenarios according to claim 1, wherein: The method further comprises: In a state where a third building scenario recommendation instruction transmitted by any cloud server is received based on the earthquake log, multi-source structures and environments of a target building complex to be evaluated are collected based on the earthquake log, where the target building complex to be evaluated is a building that is configured on the same earthquake resistance effect evaluation server as the cloud server and is in a scrapped state; The cloud server determines that the building complex to be evaluated is in a scrapped state when it fails to identify the safety value of any building complex to be evaluated in the same earthquake resistance effect evaluation server.

5. A method for evaluating the seismic performance of multiple buildings under earthquake scenarios, characterized in that: The method is applied to a second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server, wherein the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is configured with a building complex to be evaluated in a multi-source environment, wherein the building complex to be evaluated is a building in a multi-source processor different from a central processor, and comprises: For any of the building complexes to be evaluated, transmitting the seismic resistance effect of the building complex to be evaluated to the earthquake log; receiving, based on the building complex to be evaluated, a seismic effect record transmitted from the earthquake log, wherein the seismic effect record includes the seismic effect of each building complex to be evaluated in the multi-building scene environment; When it is determined that all the building groups to be evaluated have been evaluated based on the earthquake resistance effect record, transmitting a first building scenario recommendation instruction to the earthquake log based on the building group to be evaluated, so that the earthquake log collects multi-source structures and environments before the evaluation; The method further comprises: In a state where it is determined based on the earthquake resistance effect record of the building complex to be evaluated that the evaluation dimensions corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated are not less than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated, the evaluation process is continued based on the building complex to be evaluated; When it is determined based on the earthquake resistance effect record of the building complex to be evaluated that there is an evaluation dimension corresponding to other building complexes to be evaluated that is smaller than the evaluation dimension of the building complex to be evaluated, interrupting the evaluation process based on the building complex to be evaluated; In a state where it is determined based on the earthquake resistance effect record of the building complex to be evaluated that there are buildings with low evaluation quality in other building complexes to be evaluated, performing a cancellation recommendation process based on the building complex to be evaluated; When it is determined that all recommendations for the building complex to be evaluated have been revoked based on the earthquake resistance effect record of the building complex to be evaluated, a second building scene recommendation instruction is transmitted to the earthquake log based on the building complex to be evaluated, so that the earthquake log collects the target multi-source structure and environment for evaluation.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein The second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is further configured with a cloud server, and the method further includes: When it is determined by the cloud server that any one of the to-be-evaluated building complexes in the second earthquake resistance effect evaluation server is in a scrapped state, the cloud server transmits a deletion recommendation instruction to the earthquake log, so that the earthquake log deletes the earthquake resistance effect corresponding to the to-be-evaluated building complex from the earthquake resistance effect record based on the deletion recommendation instruction, thereby obtaining a synchronized earthquake resistance effect record; When it is determined based on the cloud server that any one of the building complexes to be evaluated in the second seismic resistance effect evaluation server is in a scrapped state, the cloud server transmits a third building scene recommendation instruction to the earthquake log, so that the earthquake log collects the multi-source structure and environment of the building complex to be evaluated based on the third building scene recommendation instruction.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein The method further comprises: In a state in which the cloud server fails to identify the safety value of any building complex to be evaluated, it is determined that the building complex to be evaluated is in a scrapped state.

8. A seismic performance evaluation system for multiple building scenarios under earthquake conditions, characterized by: include: a memory having a computer environment stored thereon; A processor, configured to execute the computer environment in the memory to implement the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, or to implement the steps of the method according to any one of claims 5 to 7.

Images