Overall sealing performance test method for metal corrugated sealing type inner oil conservator

By using internal air pressure to compress the rubber capsule and vacuum pretreatment, combined with real-time monitoring algorithms, the problem of moisture and contaminants entering during sealing tests is solved, achieving efficient and safe sealing inspection. This method is applicable to various types of oil tanks, reducing equipment risks and costs.

CN121702664APending Publication Date: 2026-03-20YUNNAN POWER TRANSMISSION & TRANSFORMATION ENG CO LTD
View PDF 6 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202511801545.7
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Applications(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2025-12-02
Publication Date
2026-03-20

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing sealing test methods are prone to introducing moisture and contaminants when connecting external equipment, resulting in unqualified sealing performance. In addition, the process is complicated, the models are incompatible, and the operation risks and costs are increased.

Method used

It uses internal air pressure to compress a rubber capsule to generate hydraulic pressure, combined with vacuum pretreatment and real-time monitoring algorithms, to non-invasively test the sealing performance of the oil tank. It is suitable for metal corrugated sealed internal oil tanks of different manufacturers and models.

Benefits of technology

It significantly reduces the risk of moisture and contaminants entering, improves the sealing pass rate, simplifies the operation process, reduces human error, lowers equipment maintenance costs, and improves inspection efficiency and accuracy.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN121702664A_ABST
    Figure CN121702664A_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for testing the overall sealing performance of a metal corrugated sealing type inner oil conservator, and belongs to the technical field of power transformer installation and maintenance. Aiming at the risk that moisture and air are easily introduced into a transformer body oil tank due to the fact that external equipment needs to be connected in an existing air pressure method and an oil injection method, the method utilizes a test tool to compress a rubber capsule in a process oil conservator through air pressure, so that the rubber capsule expands to push insulating oil to the transformer body oil tank, and external hydraulic pressure is generated to test the sealing performance of a connecting flange. Before the test, a small vacuum pump is used for vacuumizing a connecting pipeline to prevent moisture from entering. The test lasts for 24 hours, the pressure is kept at 0.03 MPa, and real-time control is performed through a pressure monitoring algorithm. The method is suitable for oil conservators of different manufacturer models, is simple and convenient to operate, is safe and reliable, avoids equipment damping and factory return overhaul risks, improves the efficiency, reduces the economic loss, and has a wide application prospect.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention belongs to the technical field of power transformer installation, maintenance, and sealing testing, specifically relating to a method for testing the overall sealing performance of a metal corrugated sealed internal oil conservator. This method is applicable to on-site sealing tests of oil-immersed power transformers, reactors, and other equipment. Particularly considering the structural characteristics of metal corrugated sealed oil conservators, it provides an efficient and non-invasive testing solution to ensure that the sealing performance of the equipment meets operational requirements after installation or maintenance. This field involves reliability testing of high-voltage power equipment, and related technologies include the application of vacuum extraction, pressure control, and real-time monitoring algorithms. Background Technology

[0002] As a core component of the power grid, the sealing performance of power transformers directly affects operational safety and lifespan. According to national standards and industry specifications, such as GB50148-2010 "Code for Construction and Acceptance of Power Transformers, Oil-Immersed Reactors, and Instrument Transformers for Electrical Installations," a field-based overall sealing test is required after oil filling to verify the absence of leakage risks. This specification emphasizes that the test should be conducted after equipment assembly, with the pressure remaining stable without significant drop. DL / T264-2022 "Guidelines for Field Sealing Tests of Oil-Immersed Power Transformers (Reactors)" further specifies test methods, including pneumatic and oil-filling methods, applicable to oil conservator structures of different types. The guidelines state that the purpose of the test is to check the sealing performance of connection points, preventing air and moisture from entering and causing insulation degradation. Specific requirements include: a test pressure of 0.03 MPa to 0.05 MPa, a duration of not less than 24 hours, and a pressure drop not exceeding a specified value (e.g., not exceeding 5%). In addition, the "DLBT573-2010 Power Transformer Maintenance Guidelines" requires a sealing test after maintenance to avoid accidents such as core dampness; while the "Q / CSG1205019-2018 Power Equipment Handover and Acceptance Procedures" emphasizes that the integrity of the seal must be confirmed during acceptance.

[0003] For the oil conservator of a metal corrugated sealed internal oil transformer, existing overall sealing test methods mainly include the pneumatic method and the oil injection method. The pneumatic method observes leakage by injecting dry gas such as nitrogen to pressurize the tank, while the oil injection method directly injects insulating oil to generate pressure. However, these methods require connecting the transformer body oil tank after vacuum oil injection to an external process oil conservator or temporary oil tank, which makes it easy for moisture and air to be introduced into the connection, causing internal dampness, excessive air content in the oil (exceeding the standard) exceeding 1%, failing to meet operating conditions, and even causing major equipment accidents such as insulation breakdown or explosion. Traditional methods have complex processes and require a complete set of test fixtures. Moreover, due to the inconsistency in the oil conservator models of transformer manufacturers, such as different corrugated pipe materials or sizes, different fixtures are required, increasing the difficulty and risk of operation. Existing patents, such as CN114323503B, describe a method for overall sealing test of an oil-immersed transformer, which describes the steps of isolating the oil tank and oil conservator and pressurizing the connecting flange, but still requires external oil injection, which is easy to introduce contaminants, and lacks real-time algorithm control, resulting in limited test accuracy. CN107907278B describes a method for testing the overall sealing of an oil-immersed transformer, using a gas tracer to detect the capsule. However, this method only addresses partial sealing, not overall sealing, and is highly susceptible to temperature variations. CN207964219U describes a device for testing the airtightness of an oil conservator capsule in a power transformer, providing the device structure but lacking methodological details and risk control measures.

[0004] Furthermore, the search results show that current technologies mostly focus on the structural design of oil tanks, such as CN201174293Y, a corrugated internal oil-sealed oil tank, emphasizing the stainless steel corrugated core for air isolation; and CN102832016A, a metal corrugated pipe oil tank, using ultra-flexible stainless steel corrugated pipes to compensate for volume, rather than specific testing methods. Related literature analyzes the risks of oil spills from oil tanks, such as equipment quality problems and environmental factors leading to seal failure, emphasizing the importance of sealing tests, but does not propose integrated vacuum pretreatment and algorithm solutions. These background issues result in low efficiency and high risk in traditional methods, urgently requiring a systematic and safe testing method. Summary of the Invention

[0005] To address the risks of moisture ingress and oil contamination caused by connecting external equipment during sealing tests in the aforementioned background technologies, as well as the problems of complex processes and model incompatibility, this invention provides a method for testing the overall sealing performance of a metal corrugated sealed internal oil tank. The core of this method lies in utilizing internal air pressure to compress a rubber bladder, generating hydraulic pressure to avoid external injection and achieve non-invasive testing. Simultaneously, it integrates vacuum pretreatment and real-time monitoring algorithms to ensure the safety and reliability of the test.

[0006] The technical solution adopted in this invention is as follows: A method for testing the overall sealing performance of a metal corrugated sealed internal oil tank includes the following steps: The test fixture uses pneumatic compression to compress the rubber capsule inside the process oil conservator, causing it to expand and push the insulating oil inside the process oil conservator into the transformer body oil tank, generating external hydraulic pressure. This causes the insulating oil in the body oil tank to flow to the various connection points of the transformer body, thereby testing the sealing performance between the various connection flanges of the transformer body. The test lasted for 24 hours, maintaining a pressure of 0.03 MPa.

[0007] Furthermore, before the pressure test, a small vacuum pump installed on the test equipment is used to evacuate the test pipeline. When the pipeline and oil tank reach a vacuum of -0.08MPa to -0.1MPa, the submersible pump is turned on to inject oil into the process oil tank to the rated oil level, and then a pressure of 0.03MPa is applied.

[0008] Furthermore, the air compression process is controlled in real time using a pressure monitoring algorithm, which includes: Initialize pressure threshold =0.03MPa, error threshold =0.005MPa; Periodically monitor current pressure ; like If the pressure drops by more than 10% within a continuous monitoring period, the seal is deemed to have failed. The algorithm also integrates humidity monitoring and data log recording.

[0009] Furthermore, this method and its supporting testing tools are applicable to metal corrugated sealed internal oil conservators of different transformer manufacturers and models. The standardized interface design achieves universality, eliminating the need to change tooling for different models.

[0010] Furthermore, the overall sealing test method for this metal corrugated sealed internal oil tank also includes safety measures: A pressure relief valve was installed during the test, which automatically released pressure when it exceeded 0.035 MPa. The ambient humidity was monitored to ensure that the relative humidity of the test environment was below 60% in order to further reduce the risk of moisture. The overall sealing test method for the metal corrugated sealed internal oil tank also includes a fault diagnosis module, which uses temperature sensors to locate potential leak points.

[0011] Beneficial effects: The present invention has significant advantages over the prior art, as detailed below: Firstly, regarding risk analysis, traditional methods such as pneumatic connection to external equipment are prone to moisture ingress, resulting in a 20%-30% probability of core dampness. Excessive air in the oil can lead to breakdown accidents, as discussed in the oil spill analysis, which considers equipment quality and environmental factors. This method, through vacuum pretreatment and internal hydraulic pressure, reduces this risk by over 90%, avoiding major repairs at the factory and saving hundreds of thousands of yuan per unit in maintenance costs for a typical 220kV transformer.

[0012] Secondly, it is easy to operate and has rigorous procedures: real-time algorithm control ensures stable pressure and reduces human error by 15%-20%. The results are significant: the sealing qualification rate increases from the traditional 80% to 95%, and the testing time is shortened by 10%. Quantitative indicators include: efficiency improvement of 20%-30% in batch maintenance scenarios; reduced energy consumption due to optimized vacuum pump power; material savings due to reduced replacement of universal tooling; and environmental pollution control with zero gas emissions, complying with green standards.

[0013] Compared with existing patents: Compared to the isolation oil injection method of CN114323503B, this method is non-invasive and avoids contaminants; compared to the gas tracer method of CN107907278B, this method provides a more comprehensive overall inspection. Social benefits: After promotion, it can reduce power grid accidents and ensure power supply reliability; Economic benefits: Saving 50,000-100,000 yuan per unit, with huge potential for nationwide promotion. Risk analysis shows that this method minimizes the risk of oil spills and fires, such as sealing transformers to reduce oxygen support for combustion, and has broad application prospects. It is recommended to promote it comprehensively in infrastructure, production, and maintenance. Attached Figure Description

[0014] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application or the prior art, the drawings used in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments recorded in this invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings.

[0015] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of the overall sealing test method for the metal corrugated sealed internal oil storage tank of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0016] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0017] To address the risks of moisture ingress and oil contamination caused by connecting external equipment during sealing tests in the aforementioned background technologies, as well as the problems of complex processes and model incompatibility, this invention provides a method for testing the overall sealing performance of a metal corrugated sealed internal oil tank. The core of this method lies in utilizing internal air pressure to compress a rubber bladder, generating hydraulic pressure to avoid external injection and achieve non-invasive testing. Simultaneously, it integrates vacuum pretreatment and real-time monitoring algorithms to ensure the safety and reliability of the test.

[0018] Specifically, the overall sealing test method for the metal corrugated sealed internal oil tank includes the following steps, each of which aims to optimize the test process, reduce risks, and improve accuracy: Step 1. Prepare the test fixtures: The assembly includes a small vacuum pump with a power of 0.3kW-1kW; Submersible pump, flow rate 0.3L / min-1L / min; Pressure sensor, accuracy 0.001MPa; Humidity sensor, range 0-100%RH; Tooling for standardized flange interfaces DN50-DN80.

[0019] The purpose of this step is to ensure that the equipment is compatible with different manufacturers' models, such as 316L stainless steel corrugated pipes or rubber diaphragm types, to reduce the time and cost of changing tooling and improve versatility.

[0020] Step 2. Connect the tooling to the oil tank: Connect the tooling flange to the oil tank interface and tighten it to a torque of 50Nm-80Nm. Check for any initial leakage.

[0021] The purpose of this step is to establish a closed loop, avoid the risk of poor sealing caused by the connection of the external temporary oil tank in the traditional method, and prevent air from entering and causing the dissolved gas in the oil to exceed the standard, i.e., >1%.

[0022] Step 3. Vacuum extraction pipeline: Start the small vacuum pump to evacuate the connecting pipeline and the inside of the oil tank for 3-15 minutes until the vacuum reaches -0.08MPa to -0.1MPa, with fluctuations of ±0.005MPa.

[0023] The purpose of this step is to remove residual air and moisture from the pipeline, prevent moisture from condensing during pressurization and causing the iron core to become damp, with a moisture content >20ppm, and reduce the risk of insulation breakdown. This step complies with the pretreatment requirements of the DL / T264-2022 guideline, improving the reliability of the initial test conditions.

[0024] Step 4. Fill oil to the rated oil level: After the vacuum degree stabilizes, start the submersible oil pump to inject insulating oil at a speed of 0.3 L / min - 1 L / min, control the oil temperature at 20°C - 40°C, until the oil level gauge shows 95% - 100%.

[0025] The purpose of this step is: to supplement the oil volume to support subsequent compression, ensure uniform distribution of the oil level, and avoid excessive expansion of the bellows or deterioration of the oil quality caused by low oil level; use low-foam oil to reduce bubble generation and improve the purity of the oil quality.

[0026] Step 5.气压压缩橡皮胶囊: Apply a gas pressure of 0.025 MPa - 0.035 MPa, with a nominal value of 0.03 MPa, to compress the rubber capsule in the conservator, causing it to expand by 150% - 200%. Monitor through a displacement sensor and push the insulating oil into the main body oil tank to generate an external hydraulic pressure.

[0027] The purpose of this step is: to simulate the oil volume change under operating conditions to test the sealing performance of the connecting flange, rather than external injection of oil / gas, reducing the introduction of pollutants; the hydraulic pressure promotes the flow of oil towards the body connection, detects micro-leakage, and improves the test sensitivity.

[0028] Step 6. Real-time pressure monitoring and control: The test lasts for 24 hours and is controlled using a pressure monitoring algorithm. The algorithm logic is as follows: This algorithm is used to monitor and control the pressure, humidity, and temperature in the overall sealing test of the metal bellows sealed internal oil conservator in real time. The algorithm is executed in a loop within 24 hours, aiming to ensure stable pressure, detect potential leaks, and record data for analysis. If there is no alarm, the seal is judged to be qualified; otherwise, a diagnostic report is generated.

[0029] 1. Initialization parameters and meanings: =0.03: Set pressure, unit: MPa, representing the target pressure value.

[0030] =0.005: Error threshold, unit: MPa, used to judge whether the current pressure deviates from the set value.

[0031] =30 - 120: Monitoring period, unit: seconds, adjustable according to the scenario, representing the waiting time for each cycle.

[0032] =0.003 - 0.005: Maximum allowable pressure drop, unit: MPa / cycle, used to detect continuous pressure drop to judge seal failure.

[0033] =60: Humidity threshold, unit: %, used to check whether the ambient humidity is too high.

[0034] =0.5-0.6: Proportional coefficient, used for pressure compensation calculations, which is increased in high-pressure scenarios.

[0035] : Data logging file, used for writing logs.

[0036] Second, loop logic: The algorithm repeats the following steps over a 24-hour period: (1) Obtain the current reading: Current pressure, unit: MPa, obtained from pressure sensor.

[0037] Current humidity, in % (percentage), obtained from a humidity sensor.

[0038] Current temperature, in °C, obtained from a temperature sensor.

[0039] (2) Humidity check: like Output alarm: Ambient humidity too high. Automatically extend vacuum time by 20%. Adjust vacuum pump operation. The purpose is to prevent moisture from entering due to high humidity, which could affect sealing.

[0040] (3) Handling abnormal temperatures: like or : Output alarm: Temperature abnormality.

[0041] Calculate the compensation pressure: ; This calculation uses a thermal expansion compensation formula, taking into account the effect of temperature on pressure. The reference temperature is 25°C, and the deviation is adjusted to 0.1% per degree.

[0042] otherwise: In the formula, This is the adjusted set pressure.

[0043] The purpose of handling temperature anomalies is to compensate for pressure fluctuations caused by temperature changes and ensure accurate monitoring.

[0044] (4) Pressure deviation check and adjustment: exist Under the conditions: like Increase air pressure input: Compensation amount = ; This calculation is a proportional compensation formula used to restore pressure.

[0045] Otherwise: activate the pressure relief valve, threshold 0.035MPa, to reduce air pressure input.

[0046] The purpose of pressure deviation checking and adjustment is to maintain stable pressure and prevent overpressure or underpressure.

[0047] (5) Pressure change calculation and leakage detection: calculate ; This calculation is based on the pressure change formula. This indicates the amount of pressure decrease in the current cycle; This is due to the pressure from the previous cycle.

[0048] like Three consecutive cycles For maximum permissible pressure drop; output alarm, seal may fail; simultaneously activate fault diagnosis, scan flange temperature difference, locate leak if >5°C; pause test and record.

[0049] The purpose of pressure change calculation and leak detection is to detect continuous pressure drop and identify sealing problems as early as possible.

[0050] (6) Data Recording: The data recording process can be described as writing a quintuple (time, pressure, pressure change, humidity, temperature) into a file in a specific format. ; In the formula, For log file objects; For writing methods; Format strings for f-strings; This is the current timestamp; This is the current pressure value; This represents the change in pressure. For ambient humidity; The ambient temperature; This is a newline character.

[0051] The purpose of data logging is to generate a log file, pressure_log.txt, for post-event analysis and reporting.

[0052] (7) Updates and Waiting: Update the pressure from the previous cycle. Wait. Second.

[0053] The purpose of updating and waiting is to prepare for the next monitoring cycle.

[0054] Third, the ending logic: closure If there is no alarm within 24 hours, the seal is judged to be qualified. Otherwise, a diagnostic report is generated.

[0055] An example of the content of the log file is as follows: Time: 2025-11-27 00:00:00, Pressure: 0.03, ΔP: 0.0, Humidity: 50, Temperature: 25 Time: 2025-11-27 00:01:00, Pressure: 0.029, ΔP: 0.001, Humidity: 55, Temperature: 26

[0056] The purpose of Step 6. Real-time pressure monitoring and control is to: compensate for pressure deviation in real time, ensure stability, that is, a decrease of <5%, detect leakage in a timely manner; integrate humidity / temperature monitoring to reduce the risk of environmental interference and improve the robustness of the algorithm; data logging is convenient for post-event analysis and meets the requirements of the maintenance guide.

[0057] Step 7. End of the test and disassembly: After 24 hours, slowly release the pressure at a rate of 0.005 MPa / min, remove the tooling, and sample and test the oil quality. The requirements are that the air content is <1% and the moisture content is <20 ppm.

[0058] The purpose of this step is to: prevent the bellows from being damaged due to rapid pressure release, verify the overall seal, and reduce the probability of returning to the factory for major repairs.

[0059] This overall seal test method and tool for the metal bellows sealed internal oil conservator are applicable to the conservators of various transformer manufacturers and models. One set of construction methods and equipment can be universal and compatible through standardized interfaces. Compared with the existing technology such as the direct oil injection method in CN114323503B, this method avoids external connections and reduces the moisture risk by 20%-30%.

[0060] Furthermore, this embodiment also conducts multiple on-site tests on this overall seal test method for the metal bellows sealed internal oil conservator. Each on-site test highlights the functions, roles, and step purposes in specific scenarios, demonstrating the adaptability and advantages of the method; specifically as follows: On-site test 1: Standard on-site test - applicable to medium-voltage transformers, such as 110 kV - 220 kV class; This field test was conducted in a 220kV substation infrastructure project in Yunnan Province in 2024. The test object was a metal corrugated sealed internal oil conservator equipped with a 110kV oil-immersed transformer. Test environment: ambient temperature 25°C, relative humidity 50%, using standardized testing fixtures. Test function: Provides standard sealing inspection for infrastructure projects, ensuring that equipment installation quality meets the requirements of DL / T264-2022 guidelines. Purpose: Through non-invasive hydraulic pressure testing, it reduces the risks of traditional connections and improves sealing reliability by over 90%; suitable for conventional substations, improving efficiency by 25% and reducing the incidence of moisture-related accidents.

[0061] Detailed steps and objectives: Step 1: Prepare the tooling, including a 0.5kW vacuum pump, a 0.5L / min submersible pump, a 0.001MPa pressure sensor, and a humidity sensor. Purpose: To standardize the equipment to ensure compatibility with different types of bellows, such as the stainless steel core described in CN201174293Y, and to ensure tooling versatility.

[0062] Step 2: Connect the tooling, tighten to a torque of 60 Nm, and check the initial seal. Purpose: To establish a closed system and prevent air from entering and causing oil contamination.

[0063] Step 3: Vacuum to -0.09 MPa for 8 minutes. Purpose: To remove moisture, reduce the risk of water condensation in the oil, and improve the purity of the initial conditions.

[0064] Step 4: Fill the capsule to 98% capacity with oil at 30°C. Purpose: To ensure sufficient oil level to support capsule expansion and prevent abnormalities caused by low oil levels.

[0065] Step 5: Apply a gas pressure of 0.03 MPa with an expansion rate of 180%. Purpose: To generate hydraulic pressure flow to test flanges, such as those connected to the vessel body, and simulate operating conditions.

[0066] Step 6: Run the algorithm =60s, monitor for 24 hours, if Alarm at >0.003MPa. Purpose: Real-time control, improved accuracy, and avoidance of false pass / fail results.

[0067] Step 7: Release the pressure and test the oil quality. Purpose: To verify overall performance and prevent equipment damage.

[0068] Test results: The pressure dropped steadily by only 3%, with no leak alarms; the oil quality was qualified, with a moisture content of 18 ppm.

[0069] Analysis: This test performs excellently in normal environments. Compared with the traditional pneumatic method, it reduces the risk of moisture introduction and shortens the operation time by 20%. It is suitable for promotion in medium-pressure infrastructure projects and has significant economic benefits.

[0070] Field Test 2: High Voltage Variant - Suitable for ultra-high voltage environments, such as 330kV-500kV. This field test was conducted in a 2024 maintenance project at a 500kV substation in a high-altitude region. The test subject was a 330kV oil-immersed transformer equipped with a metal corrugated sealed internal oil conservator. Test environment: ambient temperature 15°C, relative humidity 65%, altitude 2500m. Test function: To adapt to environments with high insulation requirements and provide enhanced seal inspection. Purpose: Through parameter optimization, to reduce the risks in high-altitude or high-humidity areas, achieving a seal pass rate of 95%; suitable for high altitudes, reducing the risk of oil spills, as analyzed by environmental factors.

[0071] Detailed steps and objectives: Step 1: Upgrade the tooling to a 1kW vacuum pump. Purpose: To handle larger volume oil tanks and ensure sufficient power.

[0072] Step 2: Connection, using a DN80 interface. Purpose: To ensure compatibility with high-pressure corrugated pipes, such as CN102832016A ultra-flexible pipes, and to improve interface reliability.

[0073] Step 3: Evacuate to -0.1 MPa for 12 minutes. Purpose: To remove gas more thoroughly and prevent the risk of breakdown.

[0074] Step 4: Inject oil at a rate of 0.3 L / min and preheat the oil to 35°C. Purpose: To improve fluidity and reduce bubble formation.

[0075] Step 5: Pressure 0.035 MPa, expansion 200%. Purpose: To simulate extreme volume changes and verify the high-pressure seal.

[0076] Step 6: Algorithm =0.6, integrated temperature compensation. Purpose: To cope with environmental fluctuations and improve accuracy.

[0077] Step 7: Release the pressure and sample for moisture content <15ppm. Purpose: To ensure high-pressure safety and verify oil quality.

[0078] Test results: Pressure dropped by 2.8%, no alarm; moisture content 12 ppm.

[0079] Analysis: This variant is highly adaptable to high-humidity and high-altitude environments. Compared with the traditional oil injection method, it reduces the probability of breakdown by 30%, making it suitable for ultra-high pressure maintenance and highly valuable for promotion.

[0080] Field Test 3: Automated Control - Suitable for Batch Repair; This field test was conducted in 2024 on a batch maintenance line of a power equipment manufacturing plant. The test subjects were 10 oil conservatories for multiple 220kV transformers. Test environment: Indoor temperature 28°C, relative humidity 45%. Test function: To achieve PLC automation and improve production efficiency. Effects: Reduces human error, increases batch processing speed by 30%; suitable for maintenance lines, reducing management risks.

[0081] Detailed steps and objectives: Step 1: Integrate Siemens S7-1200 PLC. Purpose: To automate parameter settings and improve control accuracy.

[0082] Step 2: Connect the sensor via Modbus. Purpose: Real-time data transmission to ensure synchronized monitoring.

[0083] Step 3: The PLC controls the vacuum to -0.08MPa. Purpose: To automatically verify stability and reduce manual intervention.

[0084] Step 4: PLC controls the oil level to 100%. Purpose: To accurately control the oil level and prevent oil spillage.

[0085] Step 5: Automatically compress to 0.03 MPa. Purpose: Consistency check, improve batch quality.

[0086] Step 6: Algorithm =30s, generate curve report. Purpose: To diagnose leaks and provide visualized data.

[0087] Step 7: Automatic dismantling and log generation. Purpose: Post-event traceability and process optimization.

[0088] Test results: The average pressure of the 10 devices decreased by 2.2%, with a pass rate of 100%; the batch processing time was shortened by 35%.

[0089] Analysis: Automation significantly improves efficiency, is suitable for batch production scenarios in factories, reduces error rates by 25%, and has significant economic and social benefits.

[0090] Field Test 4: Low Voltage Applications - Suitable for small or distribution transformers, such as 10kV-35kV; This field test was conducted in a rural 35kV substation renovation project in 2024. The test subject was a 10kV small transformer oil conservator. Test environment: outdoor temperature 22°C, relative humidity 55%, using portable tooling. Test function: simplified portable testing, low cost. Impact: extended to rural substations, achieving an 85% pass rate; high economic efficiency, reducing oil spills from small equipment.

[0091] Detailed steps and objectives: Step 1: Portable 0.3kW pump. Purpose: Easy to carry and suitable for field relocation.

[0092] Step 2: Manually connect DN50. Purpose: To expedite installation and reduce preparation time.

[0093] Step 3: Vacuum -0.08MPa, for 4 minutes. Purpose: Basic moisture protection, suitable for small equipment.

[0094] Step 4: Add oil at a rate of 0.4 L / min until the volume reaches 85%. Purpose: To accommodate small volumes and avoid overfilling.

[0095] Step 5: Pressure 0.025 MPa, expansion 120%. Purpose: Gentle inspection to prevent damage.

[0096] Step 6: Simplify the algorithm =120s. Objective: To achieve manual compatibility and reduce complexity.

[0097] Step 7: Check for no condensation. Purpose: To verify the seal and confirm the absence of moisture.

[0098] Test results: Pressure dropped by 3.5%, no condensation; qualified.

[0099] Analysis: The cost is only 60% of the traditional method, it is suitable for small rural equipment, reduces the risk of oil spills by 20%, and has broad prospects for promotion.

[0100] Field Test 5: Fault Diagnosis Integration - Suitable for Advanced Diagnostics; This on-site test was conducted in 2024 at a maintenance center in a city in Yunnan Province. The test subject was a 220kV transformer oil conservator suspected of having a fault. Test environment: indoor temperature 26°C, relative humidity 40%. Test function: integrated testing and diagnosis. Benefits: locates leaks, improving maintenance efficiency by 40%; reduces returns to the factory, resulting in significant economic benefits.

[0101] Detailed steps and objectives: Step 1: Add an infrared thermal imager. Purpose: Temperature scanning to provide multidimensional data.

[0102] Step 2: Connect and calibrate the sensors. Purpose: To improve diagnostic accuracy through multimodal data fusion.

[0103] Step 3: Vacuum -0.09MPa. Purpose: Pretreatment to ensure initial state.

[0104] Step 4: Fill with 98% oil. Purpose: To prepare a pressurized environment.

[0105] Step 5: Compress to 0.03 MPa. Purpose: To generate pressure and induce potential leaks.

[0106] Step 6: Extend the algorithm to scan for temperature differences > 5°C. Purpose: To locate flange leaks, such as those detected by the CN207964219U capsule.

[0107] Step 7: Generate a heat map report. Purpose: To guide maintenance and provide visual evidence.

[0108] Test results: A temperature difference of 6°C was detected at one flange, indicating a leak; the test was successful after repair.

[0109] Analysis: Diagnosis time is reduced by 50%, avoiding 100,000 yuan in return-to-factory costs, and is suitable for advanced fault scenarios.

[0110] Field Test 6: Environmental Adaptation Variant - Suitable for high humidity or low temperature scenarios; This field test was conducted in 2024 at a 110kV substation in a high-humidity area of ​​Yunnan Province. The test subject was an oil storage tank operating under low-temperature conditions. Test environment: temperature 10°C, relative humidity 70%. Test function: optimize environmental interference. Effect: Reliability is maintained even when humidity > 60%, risk is reduced by 30%; suitable for high-humidity areas in southern China.

[0111] Detailed steps and objectives: Step 1: Enhance the humidity sensor. Purpose: Environmental monitoring and real-time feedback.

[0112] Step 2: Seal the connection. Purpose: To prevent moisture intrusion and improve interface protection.

[0113] Step 3: Extend the vacuum period to 15 minutes. Purpose: To thoroughly dehumidify and adapt to high humidity.

[0114] Step 4: Heat the oil to 40°C. Purpose: To prevent low-temperature solidification and ensure fluidity.

[0115] Step 5: Pressure 0.03 MPa. Purpose: Standard verification, simulated conditions.

[0116] Step 6: Algorithm-based humidity alarm automatically adjusts. Purpose: Adaptive control, compensation for interference.

[0117] Step 7: Test the oil quality. Purpose: To verify the overall effect.

[0118] Test results: Pressure drop of 2.9%, no alarm; moisture content <20ppm.

[0119] Analysis: It exhibits strong adaptability under high humidity and low temperature conditions, reducing risk by 35%, and is suitable for harsh environments.

[0120] Field Test 7: Batch Model Compatibility Testing - Applicable to equipment from multiple manufacturers; This field test was conducted at an equipment testing base in 2024, testing 10 different models of oil conservators ranging from 110kV to 220kV from various manufacturers. Test environment: indoor temperature 24°C, relative humidity 50%. Test function: verifying versatility. Impact: One set of tooling covers 10+ models, saving 50% in costs; wide applicability.

[0121] Detailed steps and objectives: Step 1: Standardize the interface. Purpose: To ensure compatibility with external oil-sealing cabinets such as CN218159913U, and to guarantee universality.

[0122] Step 2: Test different flanges. Purpose: To ensure a seal and verify compatibility.

[0123] Steps 3-7: Same as standard steps. Purpose: To standardize the process and simplify operations.

[0124] Test results: All models showed an average decrease of 2.5%, with a pass rate of 98%.

[0125] Analysis: A single tooling system saves 40% on replacement costs, is applicable to multi-manufacturer scenarios, and enhances the method's scalability.

[0126] In summary, addressing the risks of moisture and air introduction into the transformer's main oil tank due to the need for external equipment connection in existing pneumatic and oil injection methods, this metal corrugated sealed internal oil conservator overall sealing test method utilizes a test fixture to compress the rubber bladder inside the conservator using pneumatic compression, causing it to expand and push the insulating oil into the transformer's main oil tank, generating external hydraulic pressure to test the sealing performance of the connecting flanges. Before the test, a small vacuum pump is used to evacuate the connecting pipeline to prevent moisture ingress. The test lasts for 24 hours, maintaining a pressure of 0.03 MPa, and is controlled in real time through a pressure monitoring algorithm. This method is applicable to oil conservators of different manufacturers and models, is simple to operate, safe and reliable, avoids the risks of equipment moisture damage and major repairs, improves efficiency, reduces economic losses, and has broad application prospects.

[0127] The above are merely preferred embodiments of the present invention, but the scope of protection of the present invention is not limited thereto. Any equivalent substitutions or modifications made by those skilled in the art within the scope of the technology disclosed in the present invention, based on the technical solution and inventive concept of the present invention, should be covered within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for testing the overall sealing performance of a metal corrugated sealed internal oil storage tank, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: The test fixture uses pneumatic compression to compress the rubber capsule inside the process oil conservator, causing it to expand and push the insulating oil inside the process oil conservator into the transformer body oil tank, generating external hydraulic pressure. This causes the insulating oil in the body oil tank to flow to the various connection points of the transformer body, thereby testing the sealing performance between the various connection flanges of the transformer body. The test lasted for 24 hours, maintaining a pressure of 0.03 MPa.

2. The method for testing the overall sealing performance of a metal corrugated sealed internal oil storage tank according to claim 1, characterized in that, Before the pressure test, a small vacuum pump installed on the test equipment is used to evacuate the test pipeline. When the pipeline and oil tank reach a vacuum of -0.08MPa to -0.1MPa, the submersible pump is turned on to inject oil into the process oil tank to the rated oil level, and then a pressure of 0.03MPa is applied.

3. The method for testing the overall sealing performance of a metal corrugated sealed internal oil storage tank according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that, The air compression process is controlled in real time using a pressure monitoring algorithm, which includes: Initialize pressure threshold =0.03MPa, error threshold =0.005MPa; Periodically monitor current pressure ; like If the pressure drops by more than 10% within a continuous monitoring period, the seal is deemed to have failed. The algorithm also integrates humidity monitoring and data log recording.

4. The method for testing the overall sealing performance of a metal corrugated sealed internal oil storage tank according to claim 1, characterized in that, This method and its supporting testing tools are applicable to metal corrugated sealed internal oil conservators of different transformer manufacturers and models. The standardized interface design achieves universality, eliminating the need to change tooling for different models.

5. The method for testing the overall sealing performance of a metal corrugated sealed internal oil storage tank according to claim 1, characterized in that, The overall sealing test method for the metal corrugated sealed internal oil tank also includes safety measures: A pressure relief valve was installed during the test, which automatically released pressure when it exceeded 0.035 MPa. The ambient humidity was monitored to ensure that the relative humidity of the test environment was below 60% in order to further reduce the risk of moisture. The overall sealing test method for the metal corrugated sealed internal oil tank also includes a fault diagnosis module, which uses temperature sensors to locate potential leak points.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Metal corrugated pipe type oil storage cabinet

    CN102832016A

  • A method for testing the sealing performance of an oil conservator capsule in a power transformer.

    CN107907278B

  • A method for overall sealing test of oil-immersed transformer

    CN114323503B

  • Ripple inner oil type fully sealed oil-storage cabinet

    CN201174293Y

  • Power transformer stores up oil tank capsule gas tightness detection device

    CN207964219U