Suspension bridge type vamp

Abstract

The utility model provides a suspension bridge type shoe upper which comprises a shoe upper body, a plurality of first suspension cables are arranged on the shoe upper body, the first suspension cables are elastic suspension cables, the two ends of each first suspension cable are fixed to the shoe upper body, and the first suspension cables extend from the front end of the shoe upper body to the rear end or extend from the middle of the shoe upper body to the outer edge. The vamp provided by the utility model has the following advantages: 1, the vamp has accurate stress adjusting capability; 2, the flexibility and adaptability are high; 3, the force dispersion effect and the durability of the vamp are excellent; and 4, the wearing experience and functionality are comprehensively improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This utility model relates to the field of shoe upper technology, and in particular to a suspension bridge-type shoe upper. Background Technology

[0002] In modern footwear manufacturing, the stress-bearing support structure of the upper has always been a key element in improving the comfort, functionality, and durability of shoes. As people's demands for the wearing experience of various footwear products continue to rise, many footwear manufacturers are committed to developing more advanced upper support technologies to meet the needs of consumers in different scenarios. For example, in the field of athletic shoes, it is necessary to cope with the complex and varied stress conditions of the foot during high-intensity exercise, while in outdoor shoes, it is necessary to consider the stable support of the foot on rugged terrain.

[0003] Currently, there are various existing technologies in the domestic and international markets for achieving stress support in shoe uppers. Among them, the main types that are similar to the technical solution of this application patent are as follows:

[0004] 1. Traditional padding support structure

[0005] Many footwear products incorporate padding inside the upper to provide support. This padding typically uses soft, elastic materials such as sponge or foam, cut to the appropriate shape and then adhered to the inner layer of the upper, distributed across key pressure areas like the ball of the foot and heel. In terms of manufacturing, it is usually secured to the upper with adhesive or simple stitching.

[0006] While this traditional padded support structure can alleviate the impact of the foot on the shoe upper to some extent and provide cushioning, its shortcomings are also quite obvious. Because the elasticity of the padding material is relatively uniform and fixed, it cannot precisely adjust the support intensity according to the actual magnitude and direction of force at various points of impact during different foot movements. For example, when running, the force on the outer forefoot suddenly increases at the moment of impact, but the padded support cannot specifically enhance support in this area, potentially leading to excessive pressure on the foot in certain areas, affecting wearing comfort, and even causing problems such as shoe upper deformation and accelerated wear over time. Furthermore, after prolonged wear or complex activities, the padding tends to compact, losing its original elasticity, thus significantly reducing its support effect.

[0007] 2. Rigid support plate structure

[0008] Some footwear, especially athletic or outdoor shoes that emphasize stability, incorporates rigid support plates in the upper. Common materials include plastic and carbon fiber sheets. From a technical perspective, these rigid support plates are typically placed in key areas of the upper, such as the arch and sides of the heel, and are connected and secured to the upper and sole using specific grooves or stitching techniques to provide stable and strong support.

[0009] However, rigid support structures also have many limitations. On the one hand, while they offer strong support, they lack flexibility and cannot dynamically adapt to the constantly changing force on the foot during different movements. For example, in scenarios involving alternating walking and running, the pressure points on the foot shift rapidly across different areas of the sole. Rigid support plates cannot flexibly adjust their support position and intensity accordingly, easily causing the wearer to feel stiffness and discomfort in their feet. On the other hand, due to their rigid material, if they do not fit the upper tightly enough or have poor conformity, they may create localized pressure on the foot, and even cause damage to the upper material during frequent bending, affecting the overall lifespan of the shoe.

[0010] 3. Local elastic mesh structure

[0011] In recent years, some footwear has also adopted localized elastic mesh fabric as an auxiliary support structure for the upper. This is typically done in high-stress areas of the upper, such as above the toes and around the ankle, using a flexible mesh material that is integrated into the overall upper structure through a weaving process. The manufacturing process requires precise control of the mesh's weaving density and the distribution of elastic fibers to achieve the desired support function.

[0012] While this type of locally elastic mesh structure can provide dynamic support to some extent based on the stretching and rebound of the foot during movement, its limitations lie in the fact that its force distribution and support precision remain limited. Because the elasticity of the mesh primarily depends on the properties of the fibers themselves and the weave structure, it's difficult to achieve the highly precise force transmission and distribution based on the specific stresses on different parts of the foot, unlike an ideal precision support structure. Furthermore, when facing significant external impacts, such as landing from a jump, the support it provides may be insufficient to effectively protect the foot and maintain the stability of the shoe upper. This can easily lead to excessive stretching and deformation of the mesh, making it unable to return to its original shape and affecting subsequent support performance and the aesthetics of the shoe upper.

[0013] In summary, while existing technologies related to upper stress support can play their respective roles to some extent, they have not adequately addressed the critical issue of precise upper stress support. They struggle to simultaneously meet the demands of varying foot stress under different athletic conditions, enabling the upper to adaptively and precisely provide support and distribute force. There is still room for improvement in enhancing wearing comfort, extending upper lifespan, and ensuring overall shoe functionality. Utility Model Content

[0014] To address the aforementioned problems, this utility model proposes a suspension bridge-style shoe upper.

[0015] The specific technical solution of this utility model is as follows:

[0016] A suspension bridge-style shoe upper includes an upper with a plurality of first suspension cables provided on the upper. The first suspension cables are elastic suspension cables, and both ends of the first suspension cables are fixed to the upper. The first suspension cables extend from the front end to the rear end of the upper or from the middle of the upper to the outer edge.

[0017] Preferably, it further includes a plurality of second suspension cables, the second suspension cables being elastic suspension cables, both ends of the second suspension cables being fixed to the shoe surface, and the second suspension cables being arranged alternately with the first suspension cables.

[0018] Preferably, the first suspension cable and the second suspension cable are interwoven to form a stable and elastic mesh layout.

[0019] Preferably, there are 3-5 first suspension cables and the interval between the second suspension cables is 2-3 centimeters.

[0020] Preferably, the two ends of the first suspension cable and the second suspension cable are fixed to the shoe surface by fasteners.

[0021] Preferably, the fastener includes stitching, and the two ends of the first suspension cable are sewn and fixed to the shoe surface by the stitching.

[0022] Preferably, the fastener includes a support fastener and a connector, the support fastener is fixed to the shoe upper, and the end of the first suspension cable is connected to the support fastener through the connector.

[0023] Preferably, the supporting fastener is a column-shaped member or a block-shaped member, the connecting member is a connecting ring, and the supporting fastener has a connecting hole or groove that mates with the connecting ring.

[0024] Preferably, the supporting fastener is a metal or plastic component, and the connecting ring is a metal buckle, rope ring, or plastic ring.

[0025] Preferably, the upper is at least one layer, and the first suspension cable and the second suspension cable are located on the upper surface of the upper, or the first suspension cable and the second suspension cable are located in the middle of the upper.

[0026] The beneficial effects of this utility model are:

[0027] This utility model presents a precise stress support technology solution for shoe uppers based on the principle of suspension bridges. Compared with existing traditional padding support structures, rigid support plate structures, and local elastic mesh structures, it exhibits many significant advantages and beneficial effects, as detailed below:

[0028] 1. Precise force adjustment capability

[0029] Unlike traditional padded support structures that rely on simple cushioning with fixed elastic materials, the first and second suspension cables of this invention employ a crisscrossing mesh arrangement and are made of high-performance materials with excellent elastic recovery capabilities. This allows the suspension cables to adapt to different loads during various foot movements (such as walking, running, and jumping), regardless of the point of force on the shoe's upper or the magnitude and direction of the force. Like the suspension cables of a suspension bridge responding to different loads, the cables can deform in real-time and precisely according to the actual stress conditions, adaptively adjusting the support strength. For example, during running, when the force on the outer forefoot increases at the moment of impact, the corresponding suspension cable will quickly stretch and disperse this force, precisely enhancing the support in that area and preventing excessive local pressure. This provides a highly fitted and appropriate support effect for the foot, greatly improving wearing comfort and effectively solving the problem of traditional padded support's inability to dynamically and accurately adjust.

[0030] 2. High flexibility and adaptability

[0031] Compared to rigid support structures that lack flexibility due to their inherent rigidity, this invention draws inspiration from the flexible adaptability of suspension bridges under dynamic loads. The first suspension cable, the second suspension cable, and the overall support structure can flexibly adjust under stress. In sports scenarios where the foot's stress points switch rapidly and the stress conditions are complex and varied (such as alternating between walking and running, or changing direction), the suspension cable can smoothly change the stress state with the foot's movements, quickly adjusting the support strength and direction, ensuring that the shoe always adapts to the foot's movement and preventing the wearer from feeling stiff or restricted. This high degree of flexibility and adaptability ensures a natural experience for the wearer during various sports activities, overcoming the shortcomings of rigid support structures in dynamically adapting.

[0032] 3. Excellent force distribution and upper durability

[0033] Compared to the limited precision of force distribution in locally elastic mesh structures and insufficient support under significant external impacts, this invention, through the mesh layout of suspension cables and their synergistic effect with support anchor points, can more scientifically and rationally distribute the force exerted by the foot on the shoe upper evenly throughout the entire support structure. Just as a suspension bridge evenly distributes the load across its various support points, this effectively reduces localized pressure on the shoe upper, preventing premature wear and tear caused by uneven localized stress. Whether worn for extended periods daily or subjected to frequent impacts during high-intensity exercise, the upper maintains excellent integrity and support performance, significantly extending its lifespan and fundamentally optimizing the long-term effectiveness of the upper's stress support.

[0034] 4. Comprehensive improvement in wearing experience and functionality

[0035] In summary, this invention comprehensively enhances the overall wearing experience of footwear. Not only in terms of comfort, wearers experience precise, flexible, and durable stable upper support, reducing foot fatigue and discomfort; but also in terms of functionality, it allows the shoes to better adapt to diverse sports and everyday wear needs. For example, in athletic shoes, during high-intensity contact sports such as basketball and football, the support structure of this invention ensures stability and safety of the foot during complex movements such as rapid movement, jumping, and sudden stops. For outdoor shoes, it ensures reasonable force distribution on the foot when walking on rough terrain, improving the overall durability and reliability of the shoe. Compared to existing upper support technologies, this further expands the advantages of footwear products in different application scenarios, bringing consumers greater value. Attached Figure Description

[0036] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this utility model or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of this utility model. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0037] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of Example 1;

[0038] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of Example 2;

[0039] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of Example 3;

[0040] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the columnar component in Example 4;

[0041] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the block-shaped component in Example 4;

[0042] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the connecting ring in Example 4.

[0043] In the diagram: 1-shoe upper, 2-first suspension cable, 3-second suspension cable, 4-seam, 5-column-shaped component, 6-block-shaped component, 7-connecting ring, 8-connecting hole, 9-slot. Detailed Implementation

[0044] The technical solutions of the present utility model will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings of the embodiments. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present utility model, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present utility model, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative effort are within the protection scope of the present utility model.

[0045] Example 1

[0046] Reference Figure 1 A suspension bridge-style shoe upper includes an upper 1, on which a plurality of first suspension cables 2 are provided. The first suspension cables 2 are elastic suspension cables, and both ends of the first suspension cables 2 are fixed to the upper 1. The first suspension cables 2 extend from the front end to the rear end of the upper 1.

[0047] Example 2

[0048] Reference Figure 2 A suspension bridge-style shoe upper includes a shoe upper 1, on which a plurality of first suspension cables 2 are provided. The first suspension cables 2 are elastic suspension cables, and both ends of the first suspension cables 2 are fixed to the shoe upper 1. The first suspension cables 2 extend outward from the middle of the shoe upper 1.

[0049] Example 3

[0050] Reference Figure 3 The difference between this embodiment and embodiment 1 or embodiment 2 is that it also includes several second suspension cables 3. The second suspension cables 3 are elastic suspension cables. Both ends of the second suspension cables 3 are fixed to the shoe upper 1. The second suspension cables 3 and the first suspension cables 2 are arranged alternately.

[0051] Preferably, the first suspension cable 2 and the second suspension cable 3 are woven together to form a stable and elastic mesh layout.

[0052] Preferably, the number of the first suspension cables 2 can be selected as needed, and can be 3-5 or other numbers. The interval between the second suspension cables 3 can be selected as needed, and can be 2-3 centimeters or other intervals.

[0053] Preferably, the two ends of the first suspension cable 2 and the second suspension cable 3 are fixed to the shoe surface by fasteners.

[0054] Preferably, the fastener includes a stitch 4, and the two ends of the first suspension cable are sewn and fixed to the upper 1 by the stitch 4.

[0055] Example 4

[0056] Reference Figure 4-6The difference between this embodiment and embodiment 3 is that the fixing components are different. The fixing components in this embodiment include a support fixing component and a connecting component. The support fixing component is fixed to the shoe surface, and the end of the first suspension cable is connected to the support fixing component through the connecting component.

[0057] Preferably, the supporting fastener is a columnar member 5 or a block-shaped member 6, the connecting member is a connecting ring 7, and the supporting fastener is provided with a connecting hole 8 or a slot 9 that mates with the connecting ring 7.

[0058] Preferably, the supporting fastener is a metal or plastic component, and the connecting ring 7 is a metal buckle, rope ring, or plastic ring.

[0059] Preferably, the upper 1 is at least one layer, and the first suspension cable 2 and the second suspension cable 3 are located on the upper surface of the upper 1, or the first suspension cable 2 and the second suspension cable 3 are located in the middle of the upper 1.

[0060] This utility model presents a precise stress support technology solution for shoe uppers based on the principle of suspension bridges. Compared with existing traditional padding support structures, rigid support plate structures, and local elastic mesh structures, it exhibits many significant advantages and beneficial effects, as detailed below:

[0061] 1. Precise force adjustment capability

[0062] Unlike traditional padded support structures that rely on simple cushioning with fixed elastic materials, the first and second suspension cables of this invention employ a crisscrossing mesh arrangement and are made of high-performance materials with excellent elastic recovery capabilities. This allows the suspension cables to adapt to different loads during various foot movements (such as walking, running, and jumping), regardless of the point of force on the shoe's upper or the magnitude and direction of the force. Like the suspension cables of a suspension bridge responding to different loads, the cables can deform in real-time and precisely according to the actual stress conditions, adaptively adjusting the support strength. For example, during running, when the force on the outer forefoot increases at the moment of impact, the corresponding suspension cable will quickly stretch and disperse this force, precisely enhancing the support in that area and preventing excessive local pressure. This provides a highly fitted and appropriate support effect for the foot, greatly improving wearing comfort and effectively solving the problem of traditional padded support's inability to dynamically and accurately adjust.

[0063] 2. High flexibility and adaptability

[0064] Compared to rigid support structures that lack flexibility due to their inherent rigidity, this invention draws inspiration from the flexible adaptability of suspension bridges under dynamic loads. The first suspension cable, the second suspension cable, and the overall support structure can flexibly adjust under stress. In sports scenarios where the foot's stress points switch rapidly and the stress conditions are complex and varied (such as alternating between walking and running, or changing direction), the suspension cable can smoothly change the stress state with the foot's movements, quickly adjusting the support strength and direction, ensuring that the shoe always adapts to the foot's movement and preventing the wearer from feeling stiff or restricted. This high degree of flexibility and adaptability ensures a natural experience for the wearer during various sports activities, overcoming the shortcomings of rigid support structures in dynamically adapting.

[0065] 3. Excellent force distribution and upper durability

[0066] Compared to the limited precision of force distribution in locally elastic mesh structures and insufficient support under significant external impacts, this invention, through the mesh layout of suspension cables and their synergistic effect with support anchor points, can more scientifically and rationally distribute the force exerted by the foot on the shoe upper evenly throughout the entire support structure. Just as a suspension bridge evenly distributes the load across its various support points, this effectively reduces localized pressure on the shoe upper, preventing premature wear and tear caused by uneven localized stress. Whether worn for extended periods daily or subjected to frequent impacts during high-intensity exercise, the upper maintains excellent integrity and support performance, significantly extending its lifespan and fundamentally optimizing the long-term effectiveness of the upper's stress support.

[0067] 4. Comprehensive improvement in wearing experience and functionality

[0068] In summary, this invention comprehensively enhances the overall wearing experience of footwear. Not only in terms of comfort, wearers experience precise, flexible, and durable stable upper support, reducing foot fatigue and discomfort; but also in terms of functionality, it allows the shoes to better adapt to diverse sports and everyday wear needs. For example, in athletic shoes, during high-intensity contact sports such as basketball and football, the support structure of this invention ensures stability and safety of the foot during complex movements such as rapid movement, jumping, and sudden stops. For outdoor shoes, it ensures reasonable force distribution on the foot when walking on rough terrain, improving the overall durability and reliability of the shoe. Compared to existing upper support technologies, this further expands the advantages of footwear products in different application scenarios, bringing consumers greater value.

[0069] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present utility model and is not intended to limit the present utility model. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principles of the present utility model should be included within the protection scope of the present utility model.

Claims

1. A suspension bridge-style shoe upper, characterized in that: The shoe includes an upper, on which a plurality of first suspension cables are provided. The first suspension cables are elastic suspension cables, and both ends of the first suspension cables are fixed to the upper. The first suspension cables extend from the front end to the rear end of the upper or from the middle of the upper to the outer edge.

2. The suspension bridge-style shoe upper as described in claim 1, characterized in that: It also includes several second suspension cables, which are elastic suspension cables. Both ends of the second suspension cables are fixed to the shoe surface, and the second suspension cables are arranged alternately with the first suspension cables.

3. The suspension bridge-style shoe upper as described in claim 2, characterized in that: The first suspension cable and the second suspension cable are interwoven to form a stable and elastic mesh layout.

4. The suspension bridge-style shoe upper as described in claim 2, characterized in that: The first suspension cable consists of 3-5 cables, and the interval between the second suspension cables is 2-3 centimeters.

5. The suspension bridge-style shoe upper as described in claim 1, characterized in that: The two ends of the first and second suspension cables are fixed to the shoe surface by fasteners.

6. The suspension bridge-style shoe upper as described in claim 5, characterized in that: The fastener includes stitching, and the two ends of the first suspension cable are sewn and fixed to the shoe surface by the stitching.

7. The suspension bridge-style shoe upper as described in claim 5, characterized in that: The fastener includes a support fastener and a connector. The support fastener is fixed to the shoe upper, and the end of the first suspension cable is connected to the support fastener through the connector.

8. The suspension bridge-style shoe upper as described in claim 7, characterized in that: The supporting fastener is a column-shaped or block-shaped component, and the connecting component is a connecting ring. The supporting fastener has a connecting hole or groove that mates with the connecting ring.

9. The suspension bridge-style shoe upper as described in claim 8, characterized in that: The supporting fastener is made of metal or plastic, and the connecting ring is a metal buckle, rope ring, or plastic ring.

10. The suspension bridge-style shoe upper as described in claim 9, characterized in that: The upper is at least one layer, with the first suspension cable and the second suspension cable located on the upper surface of the upper, or the first suspension cable and the second suspension cable located in the middle of the upper.

Images