Health interview support system, health interview support program, and health interview support method

Abstract

To provide a health interview support system, a health interview support program and a health interview support method capable of grasping the health condition of a medical checkup examinee in detail.SOLUTION: A health interview support system 1 includes a storage part 2 and a control part 6. The storage unit 2 stores medical checkup information 21, threshold-related information 22, and disease correspondence information 23. The threshold-related information 22 includes first threshold information 223 and second threshold information 224. In a process of displaying a list of medical examination results of a plurality of medical examination examinees, the display processing unit 69 performs first display for distinguishing an examination result having a value worse than a first threshold value from other examination results, and performs second display for distinguishing an examination result having a value included between the first threshold value and a second threshold value from other examination results. The first display and the second display performed by the display processing unit 69 are different display modes.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 3

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a health interview support system, a health interview support program, and a health interview support method for supporting an interview conducted using the results of a health checkup. [Background technology]

[0002] Conventionally, systems have been provided that collect and utilize the results of health checkups. Health checkups involve many test items (test items), resulting in a large amount of test result data, so if a person in charge were to analyze the test result data one by one, the work would become cumbersome. Therefore, by using a system, the work can be made more efficient and appropriate analysis results can be obtained.

[0003] Generally, normal values ​​(reference values) are set for each test item to determine whether a person is healthy, and in a health checkup, it is determined whether the test result value is within this normal range. For example, in the field of diagnosis by a doctor, a system is used that indicates whether each test result is within the normal range, and the results of this system are used to smoothly carry out a diagnosis (for example, see Patent Document 1).

[0004] In the system described in Patent Document 1, one of three grades, A, B, or C, is used for each test result. If the test result is within the normal range, it is graded A; if the test result is worse than the normal value but is considered to be relatively close to the normal value, it is graded B; and if the test result is significantly worse than the normal value, it is graded C. Based on the grades displayed in the system, the doctor analyzes the condition of the person undergoing the health checkup and proceeds with medical treatment. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0005] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2007-317045 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0006] The above-mentioned system is solely intended to assist doctors in making diagnoses, and when the diagnostic results are worse than normal, it determines the degree of abnormality. Generally, in medical diagnostic settings, values ​​that show abnormalities are considered to be signs of illness and treatment is pursued, while values ​​within the normal range are considered to be in a healthy state. The above-mentioned system is also designed to suit such diagnostic settings by doctors.

[0007] In other words, the above system is provided solely for use in clinical settings, and aims to analyze data that are worse than normal values. As a specific method for doing so, the system shows how to determine the degree of abnormality.

[0008] However, when one's health deteriorates, the physical condition gradually deteriorates, and the test results gradually worsen until at some point the test results become worse than normal. In other words, the deterioration of health begins before the test results appear worse than normal in a health checkup, and it is thought that recognizing the onset of a deterioration in health is important from the perspective of maintaining good health.

[0009] The present invention has been made in consideration of the above-mentioned circumstances, and aims to provide a health interview support system, a health interview support program, and a health interview support method that enable a detailed understanding of the health condition of a health checkup recipient. [Means for solving the problem]

[0010] (1) The health interview support system of the present invention is a health interview support system that collects health examination results of multiple health checkup recipients and supports interviews conducted for each health checkup recipient using the health checkup results. The health interview support system includes a diagnostic result storage unit, a first threshold storage unit, a second threshold storage unit, and a display processing unit. The diagnostic result storage unit stores health examination results including test results of multiple test items for each health checkup recipient. The first threshold storage unit stores a first threshold that is the boundary between the normal value range and the normal value range for each test item. The second threshold storage unit stores a second threshold that is within the normal value range and close to the boundary between the normal value and the normal value range for each test item. The display processing unit performs processing to display a list of the health examination results of multiple health checkup recipients stored in the diagnostic result storage unit in a format that displays the test results for each test item. In a process of displaying a list of health checkup results of a plurality of health checkup recipients, the display processing unit performs a first display to distinguish test results that are poor compared to the first threshold value from other test results, and a second display to distinguish test results that are values ​​between the first threshold value and the second threshold value from other test results. The first display and the second display performed by the display processing unit are different displays.

[0011] With this configuration, the first display and the second display can be simultaneously recognized by checking the list displayed by the display processor. The first display indicates that the test result is a value that exceeds the normal range, and the second display indicates that the test result is a value that is within the normal range but close to the boundary with the normal range.

[0012] Therefore, in a list display showing the results of multiple health checkup recipients, the health condition of each health checkup recipient can be confirmed in detail. For example, if there are many first indications in the health checkup results of a certain health checkup recipient, it can be confirmed that there are many values ​​indicating abnormalities. In this case, it can be communicated in a health interview with the health checkup recipient that the health checkup recipient is in poor health. Also, for example, if there are many second indications in the health checkup results of a certain health checkup recipient, it can be confirmed that there are many values ​​that are within the normal value range but close to the border. In this case, it can be communicated in a health interview that the health condition is normal but that caution is required.

[0013] In this way, the health consultation support system according to the present invention makes it possible to grasp the health condition of a health checkup recipient in detail, specifically, not only when the health checkup results show abnormal values, but also when the health checkup results show normal values.

[0014] Therefore, by using the health consultation support system according to the present invention, it is possible to prevent illness before it occurs.

[0015] (2) The health interview support system may further include an average value calculation processing unit, a disease response information storage unit, a disease selection processing unit, and a test item extraction processing unit. The average value calculation processing unit calculates the average value of test results by age group based on the health checkup results stored in the diagnosis result storage unit. The disease response information storage unit stores each of a plurality of test items included in the health checkup results in association with information on the disease associated with each test item. The disease selection processing unit selects one disease information from a plurality of disease information. The test item extraction processing unit extracts a test item corresponding to the disease information selected by the disease selection processing unit based on the contents stored in the disease response information storage unit. The display processing unit may further perform processing to display the average value of the test results by age group calculated by the average value calculation processing unit, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value together. The display processing of the average value by the display processing unit may narrow down the test items to those extracted by the test item extraction processing unit, and display the age-specific average value for the narrowed down test items together with the first threshold value and the second threshold value.

[0016] According to this configuration, it is possible to display the average values ​​by age group, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value only for the test items related to the type of disease.

[0017] Typically, a wide range of test items are tested during a health checkup, so if the results of the health checkup were displayed as is, the displayed information would be too overwhelming, making it difficult to understand the trends in one's health condition. Therefore, by using the above configuration, it is possible to narrow down to a specific disease and check the average values ​​by age group, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value after limiting the display to the test items related to that disease.

[0018] This allows you to check detailed health conditions and trends for each disease.

[0019] Therefore, when checking the overall situation including multiple health checkup recipients, it becomes possible to intuitively understand the detailed health conditions and trends.

[0020] (3) The health interview support system may further include a disease response information storage unit, a disease selection processing unit, a test item extraction processing unit, and an examinee selection processing unit. The disease response information storage unit stores each of a plurality of test items included in the health checkup results in association with information on the disease associated with each test item. The disease selection processing unit selects one disease information from the plurality of disease information. The test item extraction processing unit extracts test items corresponding to the disease information selected by the disease selection processing unit based on the contents stored in the disease response information storage unit. The examinee selection processing unit selects one health checkup examinee from a plurality of health checkup examinees. When one health checkup examinee is selected by the examinee selection processing unit, the display processing unit may further perform processing to individually display the health checkup results of the health checkup examinee. The individual display processing for one health checkup examinee by the display processing unit may include processing to narrow down the test items to those extracted by the test item extraction processing unit and display the test results of the narrowed down test items together with the first threshold value and the second threshold value.

[0021] With this configuration, when displaying the medical examination results of one medical examinee individually, the test results, first threshold value, and second threshold value can be displayed only for test items related to the type of disease.

[0022] Typically, a wide range of test items are tested in a health checkup, so if the results of the health checkup are displayed as is, the displayed information becomes too overwhelming, making it difficult to understand the specific health condition and trends. Therefore, by using the above configuration, it is possible to narrow down the results to a specific disease and limit the test items related to that disease, and then check the test results, first threshold value, and second threshold value.

[0023] This allows you to check detailed health conditions and trends for each disease.

[0024] Therefore, when checking an individual's health condition, it becomes possible to intuitively understand the detailed health condition and trends.

[0025] (4) The health interview support system may further include an average value calculation processing unit. The average value calculation processing unit calculates average values ​​of test results by age group based on the health checkup results of all participants stored in the diagnosis result storage unit. In the individual display process for one health checkup participant by the display processing unit, when displaying the test results of the narrowed-down test items, the display processing unit may select, from the average values ​​calculated by the average value calculation processing unit, average values ​​of test results for the same age group as the health checkup participant to be displayed, and display the selected average value together.

[0026] With this configuration, when checking an individual's health condition, the average value for people of the same age can be checked in addition to the individual's test results. In other words, the individual's results can be compared with the average value for people of the same age.

[0027] Therefore, when checking an individual's health condition, it becomes possible to intuitively understand more detailed information.

[0028] (5) The health interview support system may further include a patient extraction processing unit. The patient extraction processing unit extracts, based on the health examination results stored in the diagnosis result storage unit, health examination participants whose test results are worse than the first threshold value or whose test results are between the first threshold value and the second threshold value. The display processing unit may perform processing to display a list of the health examination participants extracted by the patient extraction processing unit.

[0029] With this configuration, in a list display showing the results of multiple health checkup recipients, the health checkup recipients to be displayed can be narrowed down to health checkup recipients whose test results are worse than the first threshold value, or health checkup recipients whose test results are between the first threshold value and the second threshold value.

[0030] Therefore, it is possible to select and display appropriate health checkup recipients depending on the purpose.

[0031] For example, when deciding the order of health interviews, the system can narrow down the health checkup recipients and display a list, and then prioritize interviews from those displayed, thereby achieving an appropriate interview order.

[0032] (6) The diagnostic result storage unit may store information on multiple health checkup results for each health checkup recipient. The health interview support system may further include a recipient extraction processing unit. When the most recent health checkup result stored in the diagnostic result storage unit has a test result value worse than the second threshold and a test result value worse than the previous health checkup result, the recipient extraction processing unit extracts the health checkup recipient having that test result. The display processing unit may perform processing to display a list of the health checkup recipients extracted by the recipient extraction processing unit.

[0033] With this configuration, in a list display showing the results of multiple health checkup recipients, the health checkup recipients to be displayed can be narrowed down to health checkup recipients whose most recent health checkup results are worse than the second threshold value and whose test result values ​​are worse than the values ​​in the previous health checkup results.

[0034] Therefore, it is possible to select and display appropriate health checkup recipients depending on the purpose.

[0035] For example, when deciding the order of health interviews, the system can narrow down the health checkup recipients and display a list, and then prioritize interviews from those displayed, thereby achieving an appropriate interview order.

[0036] (7) The diagnostic result storage unit may store information on multiple health checkup results for each health checkup recipient. The health interview support system may further include a patient extraction processing unit. When multiple health checkup results, including the most recent health checkup result, stored in the diagnostic result storage unit, show a continuous deterioration in test result values, the patient extraction processing unit extracts health checkup recipients with such test results. The display processing unit may perform processing to display a list of health checkup recipients extracted by the patient extraction processing unit.

[0037] With this configuration, in a list display showing the results of multiple health checkup recipients, the health checkup recipients to be displayed can be narrowed down to health checkup recipients whose test results have been continuously deteriorating.

[0038] Therefore, it is possible to select and display appropriate health checkup recipients depending on the purpose.

[0039] For example, when deciding the order of health interviews, the system can narrow down the health checkup recipients and display a list, and then prioritize interviews from those displayed, thereby achieving an appropriate interview order.

[0040] (8) The health interview support system may further include a disease response information storage unit, a disease selection processing unit, and a test item extraction processing unit. The disease response information storage unit stores each of a plurality of test items included in a health checkup in association with information on the disease related to that test item. The disease selection processing unit selects one piece of disease information from the plurality of pieces of disease information. The test item extraction processing unit extracts a test item corresponding to the disease information selected by the disease selection processing unit based on the contents stored in the disease response information storage unit. In the process of extracting health checkup recipients, information on the test items extracted by the test item extraction processing unit may be narrowed down to information on the test items extracted, and the narrowed down information may be used as information on the health checkup results to extract health checkup recipients.

[0041] According to this configuration, it is possible to narrow down the information on examination items according to the purpose, extract health checkup recipients based on the information, and display a list of the extracted health checkup recipients.

[0042] Therefore, a list display can be made according to the purpose.

[0043] For example, if you want to narrow down the search to a specific disease and check the health status trend, you can select that disease, and the search will narrow down the search to test items related to that disease, and then extract health checkup recipients. This allows you to properly understand the health status trend.

[0044] (9) A health interview support program according to the present invention causes a computer to function as a system for collecting health examination results from multiple health checkup recipients and supporting interviews conducted for each health checkup recipient using the health checkup results. The health interview support program causes the computer to execute the following steps: storing health examination results, including test results for multiple test items, for each health checkup recipient; storing a first threshold value that is the boundary of the normal value range for each test item; storing a second threshold value that is within the normal value range and close to the boundary of the normal value for each test item; and displaying the health examination results for the multiple health checkup recipients in a list format for each test item. In the displaying step, in the process of displaying the list of the health examination results for the multiple health checkup recipients, a first display is displayed to distinguish test results that are worse than the first threshold value from other test results, and a second display is displayed to distinguish test results that are between the first threshold value and the second threshold value from other test results. The first display and the second display in the displaying step are different displays.

[0045] (10) A health consultation support method according to the present invention is executed by a computer and includes the steps of: storing health checkup results, including test results for multiple test items, for each health checkup recipient; storing a first threshold value corresponding to each test item, the first threshold value being the boundary of the normal value range; storing a second threshold value corresponding to each test item, the second threshold value being within the normal value range and close to the boundary of the normal value; and displaying the health checkup results of the multiple health checkup recipients in a list format for each test item. In the displaying step, in a process of displaying the health checkup results of the multiple health checkup recipients in a list format, a first display is displayed to distinguish test results that are worse than the first threshold value from other test results, and a second display is displayed to distinguish test results that are between the first threshold value and the second threshold value from other test results. In the displaying step, the first display and the second display are different displays. [Effects of the Invention]

[0046] According to the present invention, it is possible to grasp the health condition of a person undergoing a health checkup in detail. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0047] [Figure 1] 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a health consultation support system according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 2] FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing in detail the configuration of a storage unit in FIG. 1. [Figure 3] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display unit of the health consultation support system, showing a state in which all health checkup recipients are displayed in a list. [Figure 4] 10 is a flowchart showing an example of processing by a control unit of the health consultation support system. [Figure 5] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display unit of the health consultation support system, showing a state in which extracted health checkup recipients are displayed in a list. [Figure 6]FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display unit of the health consultation support system, showing a state in which an individual's test results are displayed. [Figure 7] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display unit of the health consultation support system, showing a state in which an individual's test results and an average value are displayed together. [Figure 8] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display unit of the health consultation support system, showing a state in which average values ​​by age group are displayed. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0048] 1. Configuration of the health consultation support system FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a health interview support system 1 according to one embodiment of the present invention.

[0049] The health interview support system 1 is a health interview support system that collects health examination results of multiple health examinees and supports interviews (health interviews) conducted for each health examinee using the health examination results. The health interview support system 1 is used, for example, in health interviews conducted within an organization such as a company. Health interviews are conducted, for example, by collecting information on the health examination results of employees belonging to the organization, having a person in charge such as a health manager review the collected information on the health examination results, and then providing individual health guidance to each employee. In this case, by using the health interview support system 1, the person in charge of the health interviews (such as a health manager) can grasp the health status of each individual in detail and also grasp the health status trends of the entire organization. Furthermore, it is possible to appropriately determine the order of health interviews.

[0050] The health interview support system 1 is configured by, for example, a personal computer or a tablet terminal. In this embodiment, the health interview support system 1 is described as a standalone system, but the health interview support system 1 may also be realized as a cloud-based system that connects a server and user terminals via the Internet.

[0051] The health interview support system 1 includes a storage unit 2, an operation unit 3, a printing unit 4, a display unit 5, and a control unit 6.

[0052] The storage unit 2 is configured by, for example, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a RAM (Random Access Memory), a hard disk, etc. The storage unit 2 stores health checkup information 21, threshold-related information 22, and disease response information 23. The storage unit 2 is an example of a diagnosis result storage unit, a first threshold storage unit, a second threshold storage unit, and a disease response information storage unit.

[0053] The health checkup information 21 is information on the health checkup results for each health checkup recipient. The health checkup information 21 is configured by collecting and storing information on the results of health checkups taken by individuals. As will be described later, the health checkup information 21 includes information on the results of multiple test items performed in the health checkup.

[0054] The threshold-related information 22 is information on values ​​that serve as standards for determining test results included in the medical examination results. As will be described later, the threshold-related information 22 includes information on multiple types of standards.

[0055] The disease response information 23 is configured to associate information on a disease with information on test items related to that disease. Test items related to a disease are test items used to determine the progression state (presence or absence) of a certain disease. In other words, the disease response information 23 is information that associates information on a disease with information on test items used to determine the disease.

[0056] The operation unit 3 includes a keyboard and a mouse.

[0057] The printing unit 4 is configured to perform predetermined printing (printing) on ​​a paper medium, and is configured by, for example, a printer.

[0058] The display unit 5 is configured by, for example, a liquid crystal display.

[0059] The control unit 6 includes, for example, a CPU (Central Processing Unit). The control unit 6 is electrically connected to the memory unit 2, the operation unit 3, the printing unit 4, and the display unit 5. When the CPU executes a program (health interview support program), the control unit 6 functions as an input receiving unit 61, a disease selection processing unit 62, a patient selection processing unit 63, a test item extraction processing unit 64, a discrimination processing unit 65, a patient extraction processing unit 66, an average value calculation processing unit 67, a report creation processing unit 68, a display processing unit 69, and the like.

[0060] The input receiving unit 61 receives a signal from the operation unit 3 .

[0061] The disease selection processing unit 62 performs processing to select one disease from a plurality of diseases based on the signal received by the input receiving unit 61 and the information stored in the storage unit 2.

[0062] The patient selection processing unit 63 performs a process of selecting one patient from a plurality of patients based on the signal received by the input receiving unit 61 and the information stored in the storage unit 2.

[0063] The examination item extraction processing unit 64 performs processing to extract necessary examination items based on the information on the disease selected by the disease selection processing unit 62 and the information stored in the storage unit 2.

[0064] The discrimination processing unit 65 performs various discrimination processes based on the information of the patient selected by the patient selection processing unit 63, the information of the test items extracted by the test item extraction processing unit 64, the information stored in the memory unit 2, and the processing contents of the average value calculation processing unit 67.

[0065] The examinee extraction processing unit 66 performs processing to extract health examination examinees based on the information on the test items extracted by the test item extraction processing unit 64, the information stored in the memory unit 2, and the contents of the discrimination processing by the discrimination processing unit 65.

[0066] The average value calculation processing unit 67 performs processing to calculate various average values ​​of the medical examination results based on the contents of the discrimination processing by the discrimination processing unit 65 and the information stored in the storage unit 2.

[0067] The report creation processing unit 68 performs processing to create a report based on the details of the discrimination processing by the discrimination processing unit 65, information on the average value calculated by the average value calculation processing unit 67, and information stored in the memory unit 2. Information on the report created by the report creation processing unit 68 is sent to the printing unit 4.

[0068] The display processing unit 69 performs processing to create display contents to be displayed on the display unit 5 based on the contents of the discrimination processing by the discrimination processing unit 65, the information of the examinees extracted by the examinee extraction processing unit 66, the information of the average value calculated by the average value calculation processing unit 67, and the information stored in the storage unit 2. The processing contents of the display processing unit 69 are sent to the display unit 5.

[0069] 2. Detailed configuration of the memory unit FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the storage unit 2 in detail.

[0070] As described above, the storage unit 2 stores health checkup information 21, threshold-related information 22, and disease response information 23. The health checkup information 21 is information on the health checkup results for each health checkup recipient. The health checkup information 21 is a group of information configured by associating diagnosing person information 211, item information 212, and result information 213.

[0071] The diagnostician information 211 is information indicating the person undergoing the health checkup, and includes information such as an employee number, date of birth, and gender.

[0072] The item information 212 is information on test items performed in a health checkup. The item information 212 includes information on a plurality of test items. Examples of the information on test items included in the item information 212 include information on BMI, abdominal circumference, HbA1c, blood glucose, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, insulin, HOMA-R, HOMA-β, creatinine, ALT, AST, γ-GTP, uric acid, and systolic blood pressure.

[0073] The result information 213 is information on the results of tests carried out in the health checkup. The result information 213 is associated with each test item included in the item information 212.

[0074] The threshold-related information 22 is information on values ​​that serve as standards for determining test results included in the medical checkup results. The threshold-related information 22 is a group of information that includes detailed item information 221, characteristic information 222, first threshold information 223, second threshold information 224, and ideal value information 225, which are associated with each other.

[0075] The detailed item information 221 is information on a specific test item. That is, the detailed item information 221 is information on one test item extracted from the multiple test items included in the item information 212. Specifically, for example, the detailed item information 221 is individual information such as BMI or HbA1c.

[0076] The characteristic information 222 is information that indicates the characteristics of a test item. For test items performed in a health checkup, a higher test result value may indicate a worse result, and a lower test result value may indicate a worse result. Furthermore, depending on the test item, both a high and a low test result value may indicate a bad result (there are also test items that indicate a bad result when the value falls outside a certain range). The characteristic information 222 indicates such information that is necessary when determining whether the test result is good or bad. In other words, the characteristic information 222 is information that indicates whether the numerical value indicating the test result has an abnormal value on either the high or low side, or both.

[0077] The first threshold information 223 is information on a reference value (first threshold) that indicates a normal value of a test result. That is, the first threshold information 223 is information that indicates the boundary with a normal value (the boundary between a normal value and an abnormal value). The first threshold information 223 (first threshold) is determined based on, for example, national guidelines. As will be described later, the first threshold is determined according to each test item.

[0078] The second threshold information 224 is information indicating a second threshold. As will be described later, the second threshold is determined depending on the test item. The second threshold is a value (a value set within the normal value range near the boundary of the normal value) that is within the normal value range and close to the boundary of the normal value (the boundary between the normal value and the abnormal value). In other words, the second threshold is a set value that is located closer to the first threshold (toward the boundary) than the ideal value (median) within the normal value range. The second threshold is a reference value (threshold) for determining a result that is considered to be normal but not an ideal health state and requires future attention. The second threshold is set based on the first threshold and is a value that is located slightly closer to the ideal value (median) than the value indicated by the first threshold. For example, in the case of a test item in which a higher value indicates a worse result (when the first threshold indicates the upper limit), the second threshold is a value obtained by multiplying the first threshold (upper limit) by a number from 0.60 to 0.98, preferably a value obtained by multiplying the first threshold (upper limit) by a number from 0.70 to 0.98, and more preferably a value obtained by multiplying the first threshold (upper limit) by a number from 0.80 to 0.98. Furthermore, in the case of a test item in which a lower value indicates a worse result (when the first threshold indicates the lower limit), the second threshold is a value obtained by dividing the first threshold (lower limit) by a number from 0.60 to 0.98, preferably a value obtained by dividing the first threshold (lower limit) by a number from 0.65 to 0.95, and more preferably a value obtained by dividing the first threshold (lower limit) by a number from 0.70 to 0.95.

[0079] The ideal value information 225 is information indicating the ideal value of the test result. The ideal value information 225 is set as a value located in the middle of the range of normal values ​​(a value near the middle). Specifically, the ideal value is a value that has a certain width (range) above and below the middle of the normal values.

[0080] The disease response information 23 is a group of information that includes disease information 231 and related item information 232 associated with each other.

[0081] The disease information 231 is information indicating the type of disease. Examples of the disease information 231 include diabetes, kidney disease, dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, liver disease, obesity, and stress. The disease information 231 is information indicating, for example, any of these diseases.

[0082] The related item information 232 is information indicating the type of test item used to determine whether or not a specific disease is present. For example, if the disease information 231 is "diabetes," "HbA1c," "blood sugar," "insulin," "HOMA-R," and "HOMA-β" are set as the related item information 232. Note that the related item information 232 may partially overlap among multiple pieces of disease response information 23.

[0083] 3. Display format Fig. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display unit 5 of the health interview support system 1. Fig. 3 shows a state in which a list of all health checkup recipients is displayed on the display screen 7.

[0084] The display screen 7 of the display unit 5 displays the results of processing by the display processing unit 69. Fig. 3 shows the screen configuration (basic screen) that is displayed when starting to use the health interview support system 1. At this time, the display screen 7 displays a list 71, a year column 72, a number of people column 73, a first disease selection button 74, a list display button 75, and a second disease selection button 76.

[0085] The list 71 is arranged in the center of the display screen 7. The list 71 is a table for displaying a list of the test results of a plurality of health checkup recipients.

[0086] The year column 72 and the number of people column 73 are located in the upper right-hand corner of the display screen 7. The year column 72 displays the year in which the health checkup (health checkup results) to be displayed was conducted. The number of people column 73 displays the number of people who have undergone the health checkup to be displayed in a list.

[0087] The first disease selection button 74 is located at the top of the display screen 7. The first disease selection button 74 is a button used when extracting health checkup recipients according to the purpose. As the first disease selection button 74, a button labeled "All" is provided on the far left. To the right of this button, multiple buttons (buttons corresponding to the type of disease) are provided with disease names displayed. Each button allows the selection of "Beyond the first threshold," "Beyond the second threshold," "Worse since this time," "Worse for two consecutive years," "Worse for three consecutive years," or "Normal." As will be described later, examinees are extracted according to the information selected with the first disease selection button 74.

[0088] The list display button 75 is located on the lower left side of the display screen 7. The list display button 75 is a button used when displaying all medical checkup recipients in the list 71 (when displaying the basic screen).

[0089] The second disease selection button 76 is a button for selecting which disease category test items are to be displayed when displaying the health checkup results. As the second disease selection button, a plurality of buttons (buttons corresponding to the type of disease) displaying the disease names are provided. As will be described later, test items are extracted according to the information selected with the second disease selection button 76, and the test results of those test items are displayed.

[0090] 4. Setting thresholds, etc. When using the health interview support system 1, the operator first operates the operation unit 3 to input various setting information. Then, the input reception unit 61 receives the input and stores the information in the memory unit 2. As a result, threshold-related information 22 and disease response information 23 are stored in the memory unit 2, as shown in FIG.

[0091] Specifically, first, the normal value (reference value: first threshold value) for each test item is determined based on national guidelines, etc. At this time, the value indicated in the guidelines, etc. may be used as the normal value (first threshold value) as is, or a unique value obtained by correcting that value may be used as the normal value (first threshold value). Then, based on the determined first threshold value, the second threshold value and the ideal value for each item are determined.

[0092] These determined values ​​are then set as threshold-related information 22 and stored in the storage unit 2. At this time, the characteristics of each inspection item are also set.

[0093] In addition, the disease correspondence information 23 is also set and stored in the storage unit 2. Specifically, one disease is identified from multiple diseases, and that disease is set as disease information 231. Information on the type of test items used to determine the presence or absence of the disease and its progress is set as related item information 232, and stored in the storage unit 2 as the disease correspondence information 23. For example, if "diabetes" is identified (selected) as the disease information 231, "HbA1c," "blood glucose," "insulin," "HOMA-R," and "HOMA-β" are selected as the related item information 232, and these are set to be associated with each other. Furthermore, if "liver disease" is identified (selected), "AST," "ALT," and "γ-GTP" are selected as the related item information 232, and these are set to be associated with each other. Furthermore, if "dyslipidemia" is identified (selected), "triglycerides," "HDL cholesterol," and "LDL cholesterol" are selected as the related item information 232, and these are set to be associated with each other. In the setting operation, such disease correspondence information 23 is created for each disease and stored in the storage unit 2.

[0094] 5. Control Action When using the health interview support system 1, first, information on the results of health examinations conducted for each person (employee) in the organization is collected and stored in the storage unit 2 as health examination information 21. The health examination results may be collected in a format in which each individual sends the results to the health interview support system 1, or in a format in which the system manager inputs the information on the individual's health examination results submitted on paper into the health interview support system 1. The health examination information 21 includes information on the results of health examinations conducted multiple times (over multiple years).

[0095] 4 is a flowchart showing an example of the processing of the control unit 6 of the health interview support system 1. The processing of the health interview support system 1 will be described below with reference to FIG.

[0096] When the operator starts operation of the health interview support system 1, the discrimination processing unit 65 first reads out the health checkup information 21 and the threshold-related information 22 stored in the storage unit 2. The discrimination processing unit 65 then determines whether each of the result information 213 included in the health checkup information 21 is worse than the value (first threshold) indicated by the first threshold information 223 (first discrimination process). Similarly, the discrimination processing unit 65 determines whether each of the result information 213 included in the health checkup information 21 is included between the value (first threshold) indicated by the first threshold information 223 and the value (second threshold) indicated by the second threshold information 224 (second discrimination process). The discrimination processing unit 65 also determines whether each of the result information 213 included in the health checkup information 21 is included in the ideal value information 225 (third discrimination process). At this time, the discrimination processing unit 65 performs discrimination processing using the item information 212 included in the medical checkup information 21 and the detailed item information 221 included in the threshold-related information 22 as common information (step S101).

[0097] Then, the display processing unit 69 displays a list 71 on the display screen 7 based on the contents of the discrimination processing by the discrimination processing unit 65 and the health checkup information 21 in the storage unit 2. In this case, the list 71 displays a list of the results of all health checkup recipients (step S102).

[0098] Specifically, the display processing unit 69 displays, on the list display screen, each of the test results determined to be poor values ​​in the first discrimination process, the test results determined to be values ​​between the first and second threshold values ​​in the second discrimination process, and the test results determined to be ideal values ​​in the third discrimination process, each in a different color. For example, the display processing unit 69 color-codes the test results determined to be poorer than the first threshold value in the first discrimination process in an attention-grabbing color such as red (first display), the test results determined to be values ​​between the first and second threshold values ​​in the second discrimination process in a relatively attention-grabbing color such as green (second display), and the test results determined to be ideal values ​​in the third discrimination process in a color different from the above colors, such as gold (third display).

[0099] For example, in this example, in the test results of employee number "3," the value shown in column 711, which is the result of "systolic blood pressure," is determined to be worse than the first threshold, and the background is colored in an eye-catching color such as red (see FIG. 3). Similarly, in the test results of employee number "3," the value shown in column 712, which is the result of "uric acid," is determined to be a value between the first threshold and the second threshold, and the background is colored in a relatively eye-catching color such as green. Furthermore, in the test results of employee number "3," the value shown in column 713, which is the result of "AST," is determined to be an ideal value, and the background is colored in a color different from the above-mentioned colors, such as gold.

[0100] The way in which the results of each discrimination process are represented (first to third displays) may be any way that allows them to be distinguished from other test results and that the way in which the results of each discrimination process are represented may differ from one another. For example, a test result that is discriminated to be worse than the first threshold value in the first discrimination process may be surrounded by a solid-line frame, a test result that is discriminated to be between the first and second threshold values ​​in the second discrimination process may be surrounded by a dotted-line frame, and a test result that is discriminated to be the ideal value in the third discrimination process may be surrounded by a two-dot chain-line frame.

[0101] By checking the list 71 displayed in this way, the person in charge can grasp the detailed health condition of each health checkup recipient (employee). For example, if many test results are determined to be worse than the first threshold value in the first discrimination process, it can be determined that the health condition is poor (some kind of illness is suspected). Also, for example, if many test results are determined to be between the first threshold value and the second threshold value in the second discrimination process, it can be determined that the health condition is normal but that future attention is required from the perspective of illness prevention. Also, for example, if many test results are determined to be ideal values ​​in the third discrimination process, it can be determined that the health condition is ideal.

[0102] In this state, the operator can extract medical examination recipients (employees) to be displayed in the list 71 according to the purpose, and can also display the extracted medical examination recipients in the list 71.

[0103] FIG. 5 shows a list 71 on the display screen 7, in which extracted health checkup recipients are displayed as a list.

[0104] For example, if the operator selects "Beyond First Threshold" of the button labeled "All" among the first disease selection buttons 74, all health checkup results are targeted, and health checkup examinees whose health checkup results are worse than the first threshold are extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71. In this case, the examinee extraction processing unit 66 extracts health checkup examinees whose results are judged by the discrimination processing unit 65 to be worse than the first threshold. Then, the display processing unit 69 displays the health checkup results of the examinees extracted by the examinee extraction processing unit 66 in the list 71. In this case, since all test items are targeted, the test items are not narrowed down (YES in step S103 → NO in step S104 → step S107 → step S106).

[0105] In this case, if "Beyond the second threshold" is selected from the button labeled "All" in the first disease selection button 74, all health checkup results will be targeted, and health checkup recipients whose test results fall between the first threshold and the second threshold will be extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71.

[0106] Furthermore, if "It's gotten worse since this time" is selected from the button labeled "All" in the first disease selection button 74, all health checkup results will be considered, and if the test result value in the most recent health checkup result is worse than the second threshold value and the test result value is worse than the value in the health checkup result from the previous year (previous year), the health checkup recipient with that test result will be extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71.

[0107] Furthermore, when "Poor for two consecutive years" is selected from the button labeled "All" of the first disease selection button 74, all health checkup results are targeted, and if there are test results that have continuously worsened in the health checkup results over a three-year period (three times) including the most recent health checkup result, the health checkup recipients with those test results are extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71. Similarly, when "Poor for three consecutive years" is selected from the button labeled "All" of the first disease selection button 74, all health checkup recipients are targeted, and if there are test results that have continuously worsened in the health checkup results over a four-year period (four times) including the most recent health checkup result, the health checkup recipients with those test results are extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71.

[0108] When "worse this time," "worse for two consecutive years," or "worse for three consecutive years" is selected in the first disease selection button 74 and examinee extraction is performed, a display is made to distinguish the corresponding test item, as shown in frame 714 in Fig. 5. This makes it possible to display the corresponding item in a way that is easy to understand while displaying the first to third displays. For example, Fig. 5 shows an example of the display when "worse this time" is selected.

[0109] Furthermore, if "Normal" is selected from the button labeled "All" in the first disease selection button 74, all health checkup results are targeted, and if all test results are better than the second threshold, health checkup recipients with those test results are extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71.

[0110] Furthermore, when a button displaying a disease name is selected as the first disease selection button 74, the disease selection processing unit 62 first identifies information about the disease. For example, when a button displaying "Diabetes" is selected among the first disease selection buttons 74, the disease selection processing unit 62 identifies "Diabetes" as the disease. The test item extraction processing unit 64 then extracts information (type) of test items associated with "Diabetes" based on the disease association information 23 stored in the storage unit 2. In this example, since "HbA1c," "blood glucose," "insulin," "HOMA-R," and "HOMA-β" are associated with "Diabetes" as the disease association information 23, the test item extraction processing unit 64 extracts these items as test items. The examinee extraction processing unit 66 then narrows down the test items to the extracted ones and performs the process of extracting examinees.

[0111] For example, when "Beyond First Threshold" is selected from the button labeled "Diabetes" among the first disease selection buttons 74, the information on the narrowed-down test items "HbA1c," "Blood Glucose," "Insulin," "HOMA-R," and "HOMA-β" is targeted, and health checkup recipients whose test results for that information are worse than the first threshold are extracted (selected) and displayed in the list 71. In this way, for example, health checkup recipients suspected of having diabetes are displayed (YES in step S103 → YES in step S104 → step S105 → step S106).

[0112] That is, by selecting the button that displays the disease name of the first disease selection button 74, it is possible to extract health checkup recipients limited to each disease category. Note that the specific processing for each button is the same as the processing for the "All" button described above.

[0113] In this way, it becomes possible to extract health checkup recipients according to the category of each disease.

[0114] In addition, when the operator selects one health checkup recipient from the multiple health checkup recipients displayed in list 71, the health checkup results for only that health checkup recipient (one person) are displayed in list 71.

[0115] At this time, as a specific process, the examinee selection processing unit 63 selects (identifies) one health checkup examinee. Then, the discrimination processing unit 65 discriminates (identifies) the health checkup results of the health checkup examinee identified by the examinee selection processing unit 63. The display processing unit 69 displays the results discriminated (identified) by the discrimination processing unit 65 in a list 71. For example, in FIG. 5, when the health checkup examinee numbered "2" is selected, only the health checkup results of that examinee are displayed in the list 71 (not shown).

[0116] Then, when the second disease selection button 76 is selected in this state, the health checkup results of the health checkup recipient are displayed, along with the results of the test items related to the selected disease (YES in step S108 → YES in step S109 → step S110).

[0117] FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display screen 7, showing a state in which an individual's test results are displayed.

[0118] When the test results of an individual are displayed, an attribute display field 77, a disease field 78, and a test result display field 79 are displayed on the display screen 7.

[0119] For example, when an operator selects one health checkup recipient from multiple health checkup recipients and then selects the "Diabetes" button of the second disease selection button 76, the health checkup results (test results) of that health checkup recipient, among which are test results related to "Diabetes," are displayed. In this case, the attributes (number, sex, age) of that health checkup recipient are displayed in the attribute display field 77, "Diabetes" is displayed in the disease field 78, and the test results of the test items (HbA1c, blood glucose, insulin, HOMA-R, HOMA-β) used to determine the presence or absence and progress of diabetes are displayed on the test result display screen 79. Information on the first and second thresholds is also displayed on the test result display screen 79.

[0120] In specific processing at this time, first, the disease selection processing unit 62 identifies "diabetes" as the disease. Then, the test item extraction processing unit 64 extracts information (type) of test items associated with "diabetes" based on the disease association information 23 stored in the storage unit 2. In this example, since "HbA1c," "blood glucose," "insulin," "HOMA-R," and "HOMA-β" are associated with "diabetes" in the disease association information 23, the test item extraction processing unit 64 extracts these items as test items. Then, the display processing unit 69 displays the results of the test items extracted by the test item extraction processing unit 64 on the test result display screen 79. At this time, the display processing unit 69 also displays information on the first threshold and the second threshold for each test item.

[0121] The person in charge can grasp the detailed health condition of the health checkup recipient (employee) for each disease by checking the test result display screen 79 displayed in this way. Then, for example, by sharing this display content during an interview, it is possible to promote a deeper understanding of the employee's own health condition.

[0122] Furthermore, on this display screen, by operating a button (not shown), it is possible to select to display average values ​​by age group as well.

[0123] FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display screen 7, showing a state in which the test results of individuals and the average value are displayed together.

[0124] For example, when a button (not shown) is selected to display the average values ​​by age group (same age), the state shown in Fig. 7 is displayed on the display screen 7. In Fig. 7, the average values ​​for the individual and the same age group are displayed as a bar graph, superimposed on the individual's test results shown in Fig. 6. This allows the individual's test results to be checked while being compared with the average values ​​for the same age group.

[0125] Specifically, the discrimination processing unit 65 first discriminates the age of the individual being displayed. Then, the average value calculation processing unit 67 calculates the average value for that age based on the information on the age determined by the discrimination processing unit 65 and the health checkup information 21 in the storage unit 2. The display processing unit 69 displays the average value calculated by the average value calculation processing unit 67 on the test result display screen 79.

[0126] Also, at this time, for example, when a report creation button (not shown) is selected, the report creation processing unit 68 creates a report showing the relationship between the individual's test results and each threshold value (first threshold value and second threshold value). For example, if there are test results that are worse than the first threshold value or test results that are between the first threshold value and the second threshold value, these test results will be listed in the report and their details will be displayed. Furthermore, if there are test results that are ideal values, test results that are showing a worsening trend, or test results that are worse than each threshold value but are showing an improvement trend, explanations of these will also be included in the report. The created report information is sent to the printing unit 4 and printed. This report can also be used in health consultations.

[0127] Furthermore, on the display screen 7, apart from such individual display, it is also possible to display average values ​​by age group, which will be described later.

[0128] FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of a display mode on the display screen 7, showing a state in which average values ​​by age group are displayed.

[0129] For example, when the result information of multiple health checkup recipients is displayed in list 71, as shown in list 71 in Figure 3, if the second disease selection button 76 is selected, a screen showing average values ​​by age group will be displayed, as shown in Figure 8 (YES in step S108 → NO in step S109 → step S111).

[0130] At this time, the display screen 7 displays a disease column 81, a year display button 82, a gender display button 83, and a test result display screen 84. By operating the year display button 82 and the gender display button 83, it is also possible to display the average value for each year or each gender. The first screen displayed displays the average values ​​for all years and for both men and women.

[0131] In specific processing at this time, first, the disease is identified by the disease selection processing unit 62. Then, based on the information about the disease, the test item extraction processing unit 64 extracts information about the test items. The discrimination processing unit 65 identifies the information extracted by the test item extraction processing unit 64 and the age of the health checkup recipient from the information displayed in the list 71. The average value calculation processing unit 67 calculates the average value for each age group based on the information identified by the discrimination processing unit 65. The display processing unit 69 displays the calculation results of the average value calculation processing unit 67 on the test result display screen 84. The display processing unit 69 also displays the values ​​of the first threshold and the second threshold together on the test result display screen 84.

[0132] At this time, for example, when a report creation button (not shown) is selected, the report creation processing unit 68 creates a report showing the relationship between the average values ​​by age group and each threshold value (first threshold value and second threshold value). The created report is sent to the printing unit 4 and printed as a report.

[0133] 6. Effects (1) According to this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3 , in the health interview support system 1, in the list 71 displayed on the display screen 7, test results that are worse than the first threshold value and test results that are between the first threshold value and the second threshold value are displayed in a manner that distinguishes them from other test results. Furthermore, these test results are displayed in different display modes. For example, test results that are worse than the first threshold value are displayed in an attention-grabbing color such as red, and test results that are between the first threshold value and the second threshold value are displayed in a relatively attention-grabbing color such as green.

[0134] Therefore, by checking the list 71, the health condition of each health checkup recipient can be confirmed in detail. For example, if there are many red indications in the health checkup results of a certain health checkup recipient, it can be confirmed that there are many values ​​indicating abnormal values. In this case, it can be communicated in a health interview with the health checkup recipient that the health checkup recipient is in poor health. Also, for example, if there are many green indications in the health checkup results of a certain health checkup recipient, it can be confirmed that there are many values ​​that are within the normal value range but close to the border. In this case, it can be communicated in a health interview that the health condition is normal but that caution is required.

[0135] In this way, the health interview support system 1 makes it possible to grasp the health condition of a health checkup recipient in detail. Specifically, it is possible to grasp the health condition in detail not only when the health checkup results show abnormal values, but also when the health checkup results show normal values.

[0136] Therefore, by using the health consultation support system 1, it is possible to prevent illness before it occurs.

[0137] (2) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in Fig. 8, the average values ​​of test results by age group, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value can be displayed together on the display screen 7. Furthermore, the test items at that time are narrowed down to those corresponding to the selected disease.

[0138] Typically, a wide range of test items are tested during a health checkup, so if the results of the health checkup are displayed as is, the displayed information becomes too overwhelming, making it difficult to understand the trends in health status.The health interview support system 1 allows users to narrow down to a certain disease category and limit the test items related to that disease, and then check the average values ​​by age group, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value.

[0139] This allows you to check detailed health conditions and trends for each disease.

[0140] Therefore, when checking the overall situation including multiple health checkup recipients, it becomes possible to intuitively understand the detailed health conditions and trends.

[0141] (3) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 6, when displaying the results of an individual's health check on the display screen 7, it is possible to narrow down the results to a certain disease category, limit the test items related to that disease, and then display the test results, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value.

[0142] Typically, a wide range of test items are tested in a health checkup, so if the results of the health checkup are displayed as is, the amount of displayed information becomes too much, making it difficult to understand the specific health condition and trends. Therefore, by using the above configuration, the display is narrowed down to a specific disease, and the test items related to that disease are displayed, and then the test results, first threshold value, and second threshold value are displayed.

[0143] This allows you to check detailed health conditions and trends for each disease.

[0144] Therefore, when checking an individual's health condition, it becomes possible to intuitively understand the detailed health condition and trends.

[0145] (4) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 7, when an individual's test results are displayed, the average values ​​for people of the same age are also displayed together with the individual's test results.

[0146] This allows you to compare your individual results with the average for your age group.

[0147] As a result, when checking an individual's health condition, it becomes possible to intuitively understand more detailed information.

[0148] (5) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3, it is possible to perform a process of extracting health checkup recipients whose test results are worse than the first threshold (a process performed by selecting “outside the first threshold”), and a process of extracting health checkup recipients whose test results are values ​​between the first threshold and the second threshold (a process performed by selecting “outside the second threshold”).

[0149] Therefore, it is possible to select and display appropriate health checkup recipients depending on the purpose.

[0150] For example, when deciding the order of health interviews, the system can narrow down the health checkup recipients and display a list, and then prioritize interviews from those displayed, thereby achieving an appropriate interview order.

[0151] (6) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3, if the test result value in the most recent health checkup is worse than the second threshold value and the test result value is worse than the value in the previous health checkup, a process of extracting health checkup recipients with such test results (a process of selecting “worse this time”) can be performed.

[0152] Therefore, it is possible to select and display appropriate health checkup recipients depending on the purpose.

[0153] (7) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3, when the test result values ​​have continuously worsened in multiple health checkup results, including the most recent health checkup result, it is possible to perform a process to extract health checkup recipients who have such test results (a process to be performed by selecting “poor for two consecutive years” and a process to be performed by selecting “poor for three consecutive years”).

[0154] Therefore, it is possible to select and display appropriate health checkup recipients depending on the purpose.

[0155] In this embodiment, the case where the numerical value has deteriorated for two or three consecutive years has been taken as an example, but a period of deterioration of four years or more may also be selected.

[0156] (8) Furthermore, according to this embodiment, as shown in step S104 of FIG. 4, in the process of extracting health checkup recipients, the information is narrowed down to the test items corresponding to the disease, and health checkup recipients are extracted based on the narrowed down information.

[0157] Therefore, a list display can be made according to the purpose.

[0158] For example, if you want to narrow down the search to a specific disease and check the health status trends, you can select that disease, narrow down the search to test items related to that disease, and then extract health checkup recipients.

[0159] Therefore, the trend of the health condition can be properly grasped.

[0160] 7. Variations In the above embodiment, the first to third displays displayed on the list 71 on the display screen 7 are described as being displayed with different background colors. However, these displays need only be distinguishable from one another, and are not limited to being distinguished by color. For example, the numerical values ​​in each display may be surrounded by a frame (line) and the frame (line) may be of a different type.

[0161] In the above-described embodiment, the test results of an individual are shown as a line graph, and the average values ​​for the same age group are shown as a bar graph so as to be superimposed on the individual results, as shown in Fig. 7. However, the display format is not limited to that shown in the embodiment, as long as the individual test results and the average values ​​for the same age group are displayed together. For example, both the individual test results and the average values ​​for the same age group may be displayed side by side in a bar graph.

[0162] Furthermore, the types of diseases and types of test items shown in the above embodiment are merely examples, and can be set as appropriate.

[0163] Furthermore, in the above embodiment, the health interview support system 1 has been described as a stand-alone system, but the health interview support system 1 can also be realized as a cloud-based system.

[0164] The above-described program (health consultation support program) may be provided in the form of being recorded on a recording medium. [Explanation of symbols]

[0165] 1. Health interview support system 2 Storage section 5 Display section 6 Control Unit 21 Health Check Information 22 Threshold-related information 23 Disease Response Information 62 Disease Selection Processing Unit 63 Patient Selection Processing Unit 64 Test item extraction processing section 65 Discrimination processing unit 66 Patient extraction processing unit 67 Average calculation processing unit 69 Display processing section 211 Diagnostician Information 212 Item information 213 Results information 221 Detailed item information 222 Characteristics Information 223 First Threshold Information 224 Second Threshold Information 231 Disease information 232 Related Item Information

Claims

1. A health consultation support system for collecting health examination results of a plurality of health examination recipients and supporting an interview for each health examination recipient using the health examination results, a medical examination result storage unit that stores medical examination results including test results of a plurality of test items for each medical examination examinee; a first threshold value storage unit that stores a first threshold value that is a boundary between a normal value range and each test item; a second threshold storage unit that stores a second threshold that is within the range of normal values ​​and close to the boundary of the normal values ​​for each test item; a display processing unit that performs processing to display a list of the contents of the health examination results of the plurality of health examination examinees stored in the diagnosis result storage unit in a format that displays the examination results for each examination item, the display processing unit, in a process of displaying a list of health examination results of a plurality of health examination recipients, performs a first display to distinguish test results that are poor compared to the first threshold value from other test results, and performs a second display to distinguish test results that are values ​​between the first threshold value and the second threshold value from other test results; A health consultation support system, wherein the first display and the second display performed by the display processing unit are different displays.

2. an average calculation processing unit that calculates an average value of the examination results by age group based on the health examination results stored in the diagnosis result storage unit; a disease correspondence information storage unit that stores each of a plurality of test items included in the health checkup results in association with information on the disease associated with each test item; a disease selection processing unit that selects one piece of disease information from a plurality of pieces of disease information; and an examination item extraction processing unit that extracts examination items corresponding to the disease information selected by the disease selection processing unit based on the storage contents stored in the disease response information storage unit, the display processing unit further performs processing to display the average values ​​of the test results by age group calculated by the average value calculation processing unit, the first threshold value, and the second threshold value together, The health interview support system of claim 1, wherein the display processing unit narrows down the average values ​​to the test items extracted by the test item extraction processing unit, and displays the average values ​​by age group for the narrowed down test items together with the first threshold value and the second threshold value.

3. a disease correspondence information storage unit that stores each of a plurality of test items included in the health checkup results in association with information on the disease associated with each test item; a disease selection processing unit that selects one piece of disease information from a plurality of pieces of disease information; an examination item extraction processing unit that extracts examination items corresponding to the disease information selected by the disease selection processing unit based on the contents stored in the disease response information storage unit; a patient selection processing unit that selects one health checkup patient from a plurality of health checkup patients, the display processing unit further performs processing for individually displaying the health examination results of a health examination examinee when the examinee selection processing unit selects the health examination examinee, 2. The health interview support system according to claim 1, wherein the display processing unit performs an individual display process for one health checkup recipient, narrowing down the test items to those extracted by the test item extraction processing unit, and displaying the test results of the narrowed down test items together with the first threshold value and the second threshold value.

4. an average calculation processing unit that calculates an average value of the examination results by age group based on the health examination results stored in the diagnosis result storage unit; The health interview support system according to claim 3, wherein the display processing unit individually displays the test results of a single health checkup recipient, and when displaying the test results of the narrowed-down test items, the display processing unit selects, from the average values ​​calculated by the average value calculation processing unit, the average value of the test results for the same age group as the health checkup recipient to be displayed, and displays the selected average value together.

5. a patient extraction processing unit that extracts, based on the health examination results stored in the diagnosis result storage unit, health examination subjects whose test results are worse than the first threshold value or whose test results are between the first threshold value and the second threshold value, The health consultation support system according to claim 1 , wherein the display processing unit performs processing for displaying a list of the health checkup examinees extracted by the examinee extraction processing unit.

6. the diagnostic result storage unit stores information on the results of multiple health examinations for each health examination recipient, a patient extraction processing unit for extracting a patient having a test result of the most recent medical examination that is worse than the second threshold value and worse than the test result of the previous medical examination, when the test result of the most recent medical examination stored in the diagnostic result storage unit is worse than the second threshold value and the test result is worse than the test result of the previous medical examination; The health consultation support system according to claim 1 , wherein the display processing unit performs processing for displaying a list of the health checkup examinees extracted by the examinee extraction processing unit.

7. the diagnostic result storage unit stores information on the results of multiple health examinations for each health examination recipient, a patient extraction processing unit for extracting a patient having a test result showing a continuous deterioration in the test value in a plurality of health checkup results including the most recent health checkup result stored in the diagnosis result storage unit; The health consultation support system according to claim 1 , wherein the display processing unit performs processing for displaying a list of the health checkup examinees extracted by the examinee extraction processing unit.

8. a disease correspondence information storage unit that stores information on each of a plurality of examination items included in the health checkup in association with information on diseases related to the examination items; a disease selection processing unit that selects one piece of disease information from a plurality of pieces of disease information; and an examination item extraction processing unit that extracts examination items corresponding to the disease information selected by the disease selection processing unit based on the storage contents stored in the disease response information storage unit, The health interview support system according to any one of claims 5 to 7, wherein in the process of extracting health checkup recipients, the information on the test items extracted by the test item extraction processing unit is narrowed down, and the health checkup recipients are extracted using the narrowed down information as information on the health checkup results.

9. A health consultation support program for causing a computer to function as a system for collecting health examination results of a plurality of health examination recipients and supporting an interview for each health examination recipient using the health examination results, storing health checkup results including test results for a plurality of test items for each health checkup recipient; storing a first threshold value that is a boundary between the normal value range and each test item; storing a second threshold value that is within the normal range and close to the boundary of the normal range for each test item; and a step of displaying a list of the contents of the health examination results of a plurality of health examination recipients in a format that displays the test results for each test item, In the displaying step, in a process of displaying a list of the health examination results of a plurality of health examination recipients, a first display is performed to distinguish test results that are poor compared to the first threshold value from other test results, and a second display is performed to distinguish test results that are values ​​between the first threshold value and the second threshold value from other test results, A health consultation support program, wherein the first display and the second display in the displaying step are different displays.

10. A health consultation support method executed on a computer, comprising: storing health checkup results including test results for a plurality of test items for each health checkup recipient; storing a first threshold value that is a boundary between the normal value range and each test item; storing a second threshold value that is within the normal range and close to the boundary of the normal range for each test item; and displaying a list of the contents of the health examination results of a plurality of health examination recipients in a format that displays the test results for each test item, In the displaying step, in a process of displaying a list of the health examination results of a plurality of health examination recipients, a first display is performed to distinguish test results that are poor compared to the first threshold value from other test results, and a second display is performed to distinguish test results that are values ​​between the first threshold value and the second threshold value from other test results, A health consultation support method, wherein the first display and the second display in the displaying step are different displays.

Images