Copper-fouling resistant stator water cooling (SWC) system and method

Abstract

Described herein is a stator water cooling (SWC) system for a generator, in which a fouling-resistant metallic material is deposited on a surface of a SWC system component, such as a strainer, to improve the copper fouling resistance of the SWC system component. Also described herein is a method for mitigating copper fouling in a SWC system, the method comprising depositing a fouling-resistant metallic material on a surface of the SWC system component.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a generator stator water cooling (SWC) system, particularly one of the type in which anti-fouling metallic materials are deposited on the surfaces of components of the SWC system, such as strainers, to improve the copper fouling resistance of the SWC system components.

[0002] REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63 / 016,596, filed April 28, 2020, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. [Background technology]

[0003] Industrial generators typically have an internal liquid cooling system for cooling the stator. This system is called a stator water-cooled (SWC) system. A stator coolant, typically water, circulates through the SWC system to cool the windings in the stator. The coolant removes heat generated by the high-energy current from the stator windings.

[0004] The SWC system includes a network of cooling passages that extend throughout the stator between the windings. These cooling passages must be kept open and unobstructed to ensure a high flow of coolant to all sections of the stator. To ensure a continuous flow of coolant, the SWC system includes one or more strainers and filters to remove debris and other particles that become suspended in the coolant. If not removed, the debris and particles tend to clog and block the cooling passages of the SWC system. The strainer or filter can trap the debris and particles as the coolant flows through it, thereby keeping the cooling passages open. Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0005] A common problem associated with SWC systems is the deposition of copper oxide, typically cuprous oxide (CuO) or cupric oxide (CuO), on one or more components of the SWC system, particularly the strainer or filter. To control stator heating when high-density current passes through the stator, the stator typically consists of a network of stator strands containing hollow copper conductors. The copper conductors are used to circulate a coolant. As the coolant circulates through the copper conductors, a layer of copper oxide can form on the conductor's inner surface. The resulting copper oxide tends to desorb into the coolant under various conditions and eventually redeposit on SWC system components, including the filter or strainer. The accumulation of copper oxide on the filter or strainer can impair coolant flow to the generator, which can ultimately cause the generator to overheat or fail.

[0006] Various solutions have been developed to solve the problem of copper fouling in SWC systems. Many of these solutions require taking the SWC system (and generator) offline to remove copper oxide deposits from the SWC system elements. There is a need for an approach that does not require the generator to be shut down for an extended period of time. This need and others are met by the present invention. [Means for solving the problem]

[0007] In one aspect, disclosed herein is a generator having a stator water-cooled (SWC) system, wherein the SWC system includes one or more copper conductors and a SWC system strainer having a fouling-resistant metallic material deposited on a surface thereof.

[0008] Also disclosed herein, in another aspect, is a method for mitigating copper fouling in a stator water-cooled (SWC) system, the method comprising identifying components of the SWC system that are susceptible to copper oxide fouling and applying an anti-fouling metallic material to a surface of such component.

[0009] Also disclosed herein in yet another aspect are fouling resistant components of a stator water cooling (SWC) system pretreated by the disclosed methods.

[0010] Additional advantages of the disclosed system and method will be set forth in part in and in part be understood from the following detailed description or may be learned by practice of the disclosed system and method. The advantages of the disclosed system and method will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. It is to be understood that both the foregoing summary and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.

[0011] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate several embodiments of the disclosed systems and methods and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosed systems and methods. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0012] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 is a plot of zeta potential vs. pH at 25° C. for 304 stainless steel, a common stainless steel used in strainers in SWC systems, with the estimated zeta potential of CuO shown alongside the plot. [Figure 2] FIG. 1 shows a streaming potential cell configuration that can be used to measure streaming potential from which zeta potential can be derived. [Figure 3] FIG. 1 is a plot of zeta potential versus pH at 25° C. for 304 stainless steel, ZnO, CuO, and NiO. [Figure 4] FIG. 1 is a photograph of an exemplary stainless steel SWC system strainer. [Figure 5] FIG. 1 is a plot of measured zeta potential versus pH for hematite. [Figure 6]FIG. 1 is a plot showing the relationship between the zeta potential of 304 stainless steel and the zeta potential of CuO, illustrating the deposition of CuO on stainless steel due to the zeta potentials having opposite signs (surface charge). [Figure 7] 1 is a schematic diagram of an example SWC system for a generator. [Figure 8] FIG. 5 is a photograph of the exemplary stainless steel SWC system strainer shown in FIG. 4, additionally showing an exploded view of a cutaway cross section of the SWC system strainer wall. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0013] The disclosed systems and methods can be readily understood with reference to the following detailed description of specific embodiments and examples included therein, as well as the figures and their preceding and following descriptions.

[0014] A.Definition

[0015] It is to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, which is defined solely by the appended claims.

[0016] It should be noted that the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" used in the original specification and the appended claims include the plural forms unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, in a translation, reference to "a sanitization chamber" includes a plurality of such chambers, and reference to "the sanitization chamber" means one or more chambers and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art.

[0017] "Optional" or "optionally" means that the subsequently described event, circumstance, or material may or may not occur or be present, and such description includes instances where the event, circumstance, or material occurs or is present as well as instances where it does not occur or is not present.

[0018] Ranges may be expressed herein as "about" one particular value and / or to "about" another particular value. When such a range is expressed and specifically contemplated and discussed, the range from the one particular value and / or to the other particular value is disclosed, unless the context dictates otherwise. Similarly, when values ​​are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent "about," it is understood that the particular value provides another specifically contemplated embodiment that should be considered disclosed, unless the context dictates otherwise. Further, it is understood that each endpoint of the range is significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint, unless the context dictates otherwise. Finally, it should be understood that all individual values ​​and subranges of values ​​falling within an explicitly disclosed range are also specifically contemplated and considered disclosed, unless the context dictates otherwise. The foregoing applies regardless of whether some or all of these embodiments are explicitly disclosed in a particular instance.

[0019] Optionally, in some respects, when values ​​are approximated by use of the antecedents "about," "substantially," or "total," it is contemplated that values ​​up to 15%, up to 10%, up to 5%, or up to 1% (within up to ±1%) of the specifically stated value or characteristic may be included within the range of those respects.

[0020] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosed devices and methods pertain. Although any devices and methods similar or equivalent to those disclosed herein may be used in the practice or testing of the devices and methods of the present invention, particularly useful devices and methods are those as disclosed.

[0021] Throughout the description and claims, the term "comprise" (often translated as "having") and variations of this word, such as "comprising" and "comprises," mean "including but not limited to" and are not intended to exclude, for example, other elements, parts, integers, or other steps. Specifically, methods described as including one or more steps or operations are specifically contemplated to include each step as recited (provided that such step does not include a limiting term, such as "consisting of"), meaning that each step does not exclude other elements, parts, integers, or other steps not recited in that step.

[0022] Various publications are referenced. These publications are incorporated by reference in their entireties into this application for the purpose of more fully describing the state of the art to which this invention pertains. The references disclosed are also individually and specifically incorporated by reference into the present application for their entirety. The articles contained in the references and described in the text in which the reference is utilized are also individually and specifically incorporated by reference. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication date by virtue of prior invention. Further, the dates of publication provided herein may be different from the actual publication dates, which may require independent confirmation.

[0023] B. Stator Water Cooling (SWC) System

[0024] In one aspect, disclosed herein is a generator having a stator water-cooled (SWC) system, wherein the SWC system includes one or more copper conductors and a SWC system strainer having a fouling-resistant metallic material deposited on a surface thereof.

[0025] In another aspect, the zeta potential of the fouling-resistant metallic material has the same sign as the zeta potential of fouling copper oxides that form on one or more copper conductors during generator operation at the pH and temperature at which the SWC system operates. In one aspect, the fouling copper oxides can be cupric oxide (CuO), cuprous oxide (CuO), or a combination thereof. SWC systems typically operate at temperatures of about 140°F (60°C) and near-neutral pH (i.e., near pH 7), although operating conditions can vary. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that copper fouling of SWC system components occurs because the zeta potential of the fouling copper oxides at these operating conditions has an opposite sign to the zeta potential of the SWC system components, such as the stainless steel strainer.

[0026] Figure 1, for example, shows a plot of the zeta potential of 304 stainless steel, a common stainless steel used in strainers in SWC systems, at 25°C versus pH, along with the estimated zeta potential of CuO. The zeta potential of CuO was estimated based on piezoelectric data for CuO and its piezoelectric constant (pzc) of 9.5 (see G.A. Parks, Chemical Review, Vol. 65, p. 177, 1965). As shown in Figure 1, at the operating pH of an SWC system of approximately 7, the zeta potential of 304 stainless steel is negative, while the zeta potential of CuO is positive. Consequently, it is believed that strong electrostatic interactions between stainless steel and CuO occur under these conditions, resulting in CuO deposition on the stainless steel surface. This electrostatic interaction can be minimized or eliminated by the use of anti-fouling metallic materials that are deposited on the surfaces of the SWC system components and have a zeta potential of the same sign as the zeta potential of the fouling copper oxides that are generated during generator operation.

[0027] Various methods known in the art can be used to determine the zeta potential of fouling copper oxide and antifouling metallic materials generated during generator operation. For example, referring to Figure 2, the zeta potential can be derived from streaming potential measurements. A streaming potential cell, such as the one shown in Figure 2, has a hollow tube containing a compacted powder, allowing the flow of liquid electrolyte under a pressure difference (ΔP) applied across the tube ends. The streaming potential (ΔE) is measured across each end of platinum mesh electrodes, as shown in Figure 2. Using a metal capillary tube instead of an oxide powder, such as CuO powder, allows the streaming potential of metallic materials, including the antifouling metallic materials disclosed herein, to be measured. See R.M. Hurd and N. Hackerman, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1956, vol. 103, p. 316.

[0028] The surface charge density of a material (e.g., oxide particles or anti-fouling metallic materials) results in a zeta potential that is related to the streaming potential (ΔE) by the following equation: ΔE = E streaming = ε o εΔPζ / 4πηk o , where ε is the permittivity of free space, ε is the relative permittivity of water, ΔP is the pressure difference across the channel, ζ is the zeta potential, η is the viscosity of water, and k is the conductivity of the channel. (Note that "streaming" in the above equation means "flow.") See R.J. Hunter, "Zeta Potential in Colloid Science," Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 1988; R.J. Kuo and E. Matijevic, J. Colloid Interfacial Science, Vol. 78, p. 407, 1980. Thus, using the above equation, the zeta potential can be obtained from the measured streaming potential for a given solution pH and temperature. Zeta potential can also be calculated from the slope of ΔP versus ΔE, see P. Jayaweera et. al., EPRI Report TR-101256, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, October 1992.

[0029] The selection of antifouling metallic materials can also be based on piezoelectric constant (pzc) or isoelectric point data. The piezoelectric constant (pzc) or isoelectric point is the pH at which suspended solids have a net zero surface charge. By applying an antifouling metallic material to fouling copper oxide based on the piezoelectric constant (pzc) or isoelectric point of the metallic material and oxide, the sign of the zeta potential at the operating conditions of the SWC system can be matched to the same sign, thereby reducing or eliminating oxide fouling.

[0030] Thus, in one aspect, the fouling-resistant metallic material has a piezoelectric constant (pzc) or isoelectric point that is close to the piezoelectric constant (pzc) or isoelectric point of the fouling copper oxide that forms during operation of the generator. In another aspect, the fouling-resistant metallic material has an isoelectric point that is 1.5 pH units or more lower than the fouling copper oxide that forms on one or more copper conductors during operation of the generator. For example, assuming a piezoelectric constant (pzc) or isoelectric point of 9.5 for CuO, a suitable fouling-resistant metallic material, in one aspect, may have a corresponding piezoelectric constant (pzc) or isoelectric point of 8 or greater.

[0031] Non-limiting examples of suitable anti-fouling metallic materials include anti-fouling metallic materials comprised of Zn, Al, Cu, Ni, Cd, or combinations or alloys thereof. Examples of such materials include, but are not limited to, ZnO, Al2O3, CuO, NiO, CdO, or combinations or alloys thereof. In one aspect, the anti-fouling metallic material comprises Zn, Cu, Ni, or combinations or alloys thereof, such as ZnO, CuO, NiO, or combinations or alloys thereof. In another aspect, the anti-fouling metallic material comprises Monel (Ni / Cu alloy), brass (Zn / Cu alloy), cupronickel (Cu / Ni alloy), or combinations thereof.

[0032] The piezoelectric constants (pzc) or isoelectric points of some exemplary antifouling metallic materials are shown in Table 1, see G.A. Parks, Chemical Review, 1965, vol. 65, p. 177. Table 1. Isoelectric points (pzc) of example antifouling metal materials TIFF0007801249000001.tif39153 As shown in this table, for example, the piezoelectric constant (pzc) or isoelectric point of the anti-fouling metallic material is close to the piezoelectric constant or isoelectric point of the fouling copper oxide (e.g., CuO, which has a pzc of 9.5) that is produced during generator operation.

[0033] Similarly, as noted above, anti-fouling metallic materials can be selected based on their zeta potential, calculated, for example, via streaming potential measurements or extrapolated from piezoelectric constant (pzc) or isoelectric point data. Figure 3 is a plot of zeta potential versus pH for, for example, stainless steel, ZnO, CuO, and NiO. As shown in Figure 3, the zeta potentials of ZnO, CuO, and NiO have the same sign as that of fouling copper oxide at an SWC operating pH of about 7.

[0034] When the anti-fouling metallic material is composed of CuO, the CuO constituting the anti-fouling metallic material is different from any fouled CuO that occurs during operation of the generator. For example, an SWC system component having a CuO anti-fouling film deposited on its surface is not a fouled system component that occurs during operation of the generator. Thus, in one aspect, when the anti-fouling metallic material is composed of CuO, the CuO is not CuO that occurs on copper conductors and is released into the coolant during operation of the generator.

[0035] Various SWC system components may be made of anti-fouling metallic materials. Examples of such components include SWC system filters and SWC system strainers. Typical SWC filters have pore sizes ranging from about 1 μm to about 20 μm. Typical stainless steel strainers typically have mesh opening sizes of about 15 μm to 100 μm. An exemplary stainless steel SWC system strainer is shown in the photographic representation of FIG. 4.

[0036] According to one aspect, an anti-fouling metallic material is deposited on the surface of a SWC system component, such as a strainer or filter. The anti-fouling metallic material may be deposited on the surface of the SWC system component using a variety of methods known in the art, including chemical vapor deposition ("CVD"), plasma or high velocity oxygen fuel (HVOF) thermal spray coating, wire arc, physical vapor deposition (PVD), radio frequency (RF) sputtering, electroplating, and electroless plating. Thus, in one aspect, a stainless steel SWC system strainer comprises an anti-fouling metallic material deposited, coated, or plated on the stainless steel surface of the SWC system strainer.

[0037] When an anti-fouling metallic material is applied to the surface of a SWC system component, the thickness of the metallic material can vary depending on the type of SWC system component. Generally, for a strainer or filter, the anti-fouling metallic material should be thick enough to cover the surface of the strainer or filter, but not so thick that it blocks the mesh openings or pores of the strainer or filter. For example, a suitable process can apply a conformal surface coating, including a coating that is applied to the mesh openings or pores of a metallic, e.g., stainless steel, component of the SWC system without blocking the mesh openings or pores.

[0038] In one aspect, the thickness of the anti-fouling metal material can be about 0.1 microns to about 300 microns. In another aspect, the thickness of the anti-fouling metal material can be about 10 μm to about 100 μm. For example, the thickness of the anti-fouling metal material can be about 10 μm, about 15 μm, about 20 μm, about 25 μm, about 40 μm, about 50 μm, about 60 μm, about 70 μm, about 80 μm, about 90 μm, or about 100 μm. In one aspect, the anti-fouling metal material conforms to the surface of the SWC system component, such as a stainless steel strainer, such that the anti-fouling metal material covers substantially all or all of the exterior surface of the SWC system component.

[0039] C. How to mitigate copper contamination in stator water cooling (SWC) systems

[0040] Also disclosed herein, in another aspect, is a method for mitigating copper fouling in a stator water-cooled (SWC) system, the method comprising the steps of: (a) identifying a component of the SWC system that is susceptible to copper oxide fouling; and (b) applying a fouling-resistant metallic material to a surface of the component to mitigate copper fouling in the component. This method can be used with the disclosed stator water-cooled (SWC) system, but can also be used with other systems and other components.

[0041] In one aspect, the method includes depositing an anti-fouling metallic material on the surface of a SWC component having a zeta potential with the same sign as the zeta potential of fouling copper oxides, e.g., cupric oxide (CuO) or cuprous oxide (CuO), generated during operation of the generator. The method can be used on a variety of SWC system components, including, but not limited to, SWC system filters or strainers, including SWC system strainers made of stainless steel.

[0042] The fouling-resistant metallic material may be selected, as described above, for example, by measuring the streaming potential of the metallic material to obtain a zeta potential or by correlating the zeta potential with known or measured piezoelectric constant (pzc) or isoelectric point data. Thus, as described above, examples of fouling-resistant metallic materials suitable for use with the present method include metallic materials comprised of Zn, Al, Cu, Ni, Cd, or combinations or alloys thereof. Examples of such materials include, but are not limited to, ZnO, Al2O3, CuO, NiO, CdO, or combinations or alloys thereof. In one aspect, the fouling-resistant metallic material is comprised of Zn, Cu, Ni, or combinations or alloys thereof, such as ZnO, CuO, NiO, or combinations or alloys thereof. In another aspect, the fouling-resistant metallic material is comprised of Monel (Ni / Cu alloy), brass (Zn / Cu alloy), cupronickel (Cu / Ni alloy), or combinations thereof.

[0043] According to one aspect, an anti-fouling metallic material is deposited on the surface of a SWC system component, such as a strainer or filter. The anti-fouling metallic material may be deposited on the surface of the SWC system component using a variety of methods known in the art, including chemical vapor deposition ("CVD"), plasma or high velocity oxygen fuel (HVOF) thermal spray coating, wire arc, physical vapor deposition (PVD), radio frequency (RF) sputtering, electroplating, and electroless plating. Thus, in one aspect, a stainless steel SWC system strainer comprises an anti-fouling metallic material deposited, coated, or plated on the stainless steel surface of the SWC system strainer.

[0044] In one aspect, the thickness of the anti-fouling metallic material applied to the SWC system component can be about 0.1 microns to about 300 microns. In another aspect, the thickness of the anti-fouling metallic material can be about 10 μm to about 100 μm. For example, the thickness of the anti-fouling metallic material can be about 10 μm, about 15 μm, about 20 μm, about 25 μm, about 40 μm, about 50 μm, about 60 μm, about 70 μm, about 80 μm, about 90 μm, or about 100 μm. In one aspect, the anti-fouling metallic material conforms to the surface of the SWC system component, such as a stainless steel strainer, such that the anti-fouling metallic material covers substantially all or all of the exterior surface of the SWC system component.

[0045] Also disclosed herein in another aspect are fouling-resistant components of SWC systems pretreated by the disclosed methods. Suitable components that can be made fouling-resistant include, but are not limited to, SWC filters or strainers, including SWC system strainers made of stainless steel.

[0046] 7 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary SWC system 10 for a generator 14. The SWC system 10 circulates a suitable coolant through the stator cooling conduits 12 of the generator 14. The SWC system 10 includes piping 16 suitable for carrying the coolant through a network external to the generator 14 and including an SWC system strainer 18. In some aspects, this network may further include other filters 20, a pump 22, a heat exchanger 24, a flow regulator 26, a coolant flow meter 28, a water purification system bed or layer 30, a rectifier 32, and a coolant reservoir tank 34.

[0047] In the embodiment shown in FIG. 7, coolant constantly circulates through the SWC system network (including through the strainer 18). The coolant may be drawn from a reservoir tank 34 by the stator water pump 22, and then flow into one or more heat exchangers 24, which cool the fluid. The cooled fluid from the heat exchangers 24 flows through the filter 20 and the SWC system strainer 18 and into the stator cooling conduits of the generator 14. As the coolant flows over and along the copper windings, it removes heat from the stator and windings. Heat is carried away from the generator 14 by the coolant and into the reservoir 34.

[0048] In some aspects, charge accumulated by the coolant as it passes through the charge passages in the stator is discharged as the coolant circulates through the rectifier 32. Optionally, in some aspects, a deionizer bed 30 removes ions from the coolant, thereby reducing the tendency for fouling metal oxides to form in the coolant. In some aspects, the coolant flow rate may be controlled by a flow control valve 26 and monitored by a flow meter 28, thereby providing feedback control for the controller 44 to operate the control valve 26. Applying an anti-fouling material, as described herein, to the surfaces of the strainer 18 or other components of the SWC system that are susceptible to fouling can reduce or minimize fouling of the strainer or other components. In some aspects, components that can benefit from the anti-fouling material include the strainer 18, filter 20, pump 22, and heat exchanger 24, among other SWC system components that are susceptible to fouling.

[0049] FIG. 8 is a photograph of the exemplary stainless steel SWC system strainer shown in FIG. 4 , additionally illustrating an exploded cross-sectional cutaway view of the SWC system strainer wall. Referring to the exploded cross-sectional view of the wall of the SWC system strainer 60, a typical SWC system strainer has a body portion 70 defining an interior cavity 75 and further defining a plurality of small holes or apertures 80. In some aspects, the coolant used in the SWC system passes through the plurality of small holes 80, while the SWC system strainer 60 captures particles in the coolant. The body portion 70 can have an anti-fouling film, as described herein, deposited on at least a portion (or all portions) of its surface, which can inhibit the deposition of fouling metal oxides present in the coolant as it passes through the SWC system strainer 60.

[0050] While the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 8 is a mesh-type SWC system strainer, any conventional SWC system strainer capable of functionally allowing fluid, e.g., coolant, to pass through while capturing particles in the fluid can be used. Thus, the SWC system strainer can have any suitable size mesh openings, screen openings, perforations, etc., used in SWC systems. In some aspects, the entire surface of the body portion 70 can be provided with anti-fouling material. The thickness of the anti-fouling material on the body portion 70 can vary within the broad limits described above. In some aspects, the strainer 60 can have an outer casing, as will be recognized by those skilled in the art. The strainer 60 can be an in-line type (as shown in FIG. 7) or another suitable form of strainer in the generator's SWC system.

[0051] D. Working Example

[0052] The following examples are provided to provide those skilled in the art with a complete disclosure and description of how to construct and evaluate the system claimed herein; these examples are intended to be purely illustrative and are not intended to limit the scope of protection that the inventors regard as their invention. Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers, but some errors and deviations should be accounted for. Unless otherwise specified, parts are parts by weight, temperatures are in °F or are ambient temperatures, and pressures are at or near atmospheric pressure. The examples are provided herein to illustrate the invention, and should not be construed as limiting the invention in any way.

[0053] Plant data from high-dissolved oxygen (DO) SWC systems indicate that measured copper is largely non-filterable (passes through membrane filters). However, under high DO conditions, most copper forms are insoluble, suggesting the presence of fine (colloidal) copper oxide particles. Copper forms (e.g., CuO) in plant SWC system samples have not been characterized in the literature. SWC fluid pH values, which are rarely measured, are typically close to 7, with some lower reported values ​​likely due to carbon dioxide dissolution and ionization due to high air infiltration.

[0054] Due to a lack of zeta potential data for copper oxide over the pH and potential ranges of interest for high-DO SWC systems, laboratory zeta potential measurements were performed. The purpose of these measurements was to provide data that could be used as a basis for selecting alternative materials of construction for SWC system strainers that would resist fouling (clogging) caused by copper oxide deposition on the oxide film that forms on stainless steel wire mesh media.

[0055] There are several possible chemical and physical processes and interactions that can affect fouling. These include, for example, van der Waals forces, electrostatic forces, hydrothermal effects, and precipitation. The origin of a particle's electrostatic properties is related to the electric double layer properties of the particle's surface. One method for obtaining experimental data on the electric double layer is to measure the zeta potential. Typically, only a very thin layer of fluid adheres to the surface. This layer is called the hydrodynamic stagnant layer. This stagnant layer can conduct charge despite its immobile nature. The interface between the hydrodynamic stagnant layer and the bulk solution is called the hydrodynamic slip plane (slip plane, shear plane, shear surface, shear boundary). The electric potential at the slip plane is called the zeta potential (ζ potential). The zeta potential is determined by the water chemistry (e.g., pH and oxygen content) and the temperature of the solution.

[0056] The zeta potential of hematite (Fe2O3) (benchmark material), cupric oxide (CuO), and nickel oxide (NiO) powders was measured as a function of pH (T=50°C / 122°F). NiO was included in the oxide to allow for zeta potential measurements based on the use of Monel (Cu / Ni alloy) as an alternative SWC system strainer construction material. The Monel surface contains CuO and NiO in the surface oxide layer.

[0057] Materials and Methods. The measurement solutions were laboratory deionized water with a conductivity of ∼0.1 μS / cm (adjusted by adding KNO). The pH was adjusted with NaOH and HNO. The oxygen content of these solutions was 4 ppm. The oxygen powders were FeO (≥96%, Sigma-Aldrich), CuO (99.995%, Sigma-Aldrich), and NiO (≥99.998%, PURATRONIC, Alfa Aesar). The FeO powder was sieved through a 75 μm stainless steel sieve, and the CuO and NiO powders were sieved through a 25 μm stainless steel sieve. The particle size distributions were measured using a Mastersizer 3000 laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Malvern Panalytical). Zeta potential measurements were performed using a Malvern Panalytical Zetasizer Nano ZS (ZEN3600) instrument. The Zetasizer measures zeta potential by performing an electrophoretic experiment on the sample and determining electrophoretic mobility by measuring particle velocity using a laser Doppler anemometer.

[0058] Zeta potential measurements were performed at T = 50°C (122°F). The samples were allowed to stabilize at that temperature for at least 200 seconds before measurements began. The instrument measured the electrophoretic mobility of the samples 10 to 50 times in automatic mode, and the results were used to calculate the average zeta potential. This was repeated three times for each sample. This was repeated for each different sample at each pH until a stable zeta potential value was obtained. This process was repeated for several days (6 to 12 days), with fresh solutions prepared each day. The total number of repetitions at each pH was approximately 20 to 40.

[0059] Hematite (Fe2O3). The zeta potential of hematite was measured as a benchmark to validate the method used. The results shown in Figure 5 show agreement between the laboratory measurements and published values ​​found in the technical literature, see e.g.,E. E. Ferreira et. al., "Zeta Potential Measurements using the Electroacoustic Method for Quartz and Hematite", Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2001. R. C. Plaza et. al., "Electrical Surface Charge and Potential of Hematite / Yttrium Oxide Core-Shell Colloidal Particles", Colloid and Polymer Science ), 2001, Vol. 279, pp. 1206-1211. Junia Soares Alejandrino et. al., "Dispersion degree and zeta potential of hematite", R. Esc. Minas, Ouro Preto, April-June 2016, 69(2). Kunio Esumi et. al., "Mixed Colloidal Dispersions of Silica and Hematite", The Chemical Society of Japan, Bulletin 61, pp. 2287-2290, 1988.

[0060] Cupric oxide (CuO). Results of CuO zeta potential measurements at 50°C (122°F) are shown in Figure 6, along with published 304SS zeta potential values ​​at approximately 25°C (77°F) as a function of pH. See B. Levy and A.R. Fritsch, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1959, 106, 730. Zeta potential data for CuO were not previously available. However, pzc (point of zero charge) data are available for CuO in the technical literature (pzc = 9.5 for CuO at 25°C). G.A. Parks, Chemical Review, 1965, 65, 177.

[0061] The results confirm the deposition of copper oxide on the stainless steel surface. Figure 6 also shows the pH zone of the SWC as a gray bar around pH 7. In this SWC operating pH zone, the zeta potential of 304SS is negative, while the zeta potential of CuO is positive. Therefore, a strong electrostatic interaction between 304SS and copper oxide is expected in this pH range, as indicated by the double-pointing arrows, making CuO deposition on 304SS feasible for the SWC system. Thus, the principle of zeta potential can explain why copper oxide deposits on the 304SS surface.

[0062] The results in Figure 6 show that CuO has a zeta potential of the same sign as the zeta potential of the copper metal surface at the SWC operating pH. These results confirm that CuO deposition is not expected on any copper material or its alloys, such as Monel (Ni / Cu alloy), brass (Zn / Cu alloy), or cupronickel (Cu / Ni alloy). SWC system strainers made of or coated with any of these metals or alloys are expected to resist copper oxide fouling based on zeta potential principles.

[0063] Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, equivalents to the embodiments of the systems and methods described herein which equivalents are encompassed within the scope of the invention as defined by the claims.

Claims

1. 1. A generator having a stator water cooling (SWC) system, the SWC system comprising: a) one or more copper conductors; b) a SWC system strainer made of stainless steel and having a fouling-resistant metal material clad on its surface, wherein the fouling-resistant metal material is Monel, brass, cupronickel, or a combination thereof.

2. 2. The generator of claim 1, wherein at the operating pH and temperature of the SWC system, the zeta potential of the fouling resistant metallic material has the same sign as the zeta potential of fouling copper oxide that forms on the one or more copper conductors during operation of the generator.

3. The contaminated copper oxide is cuprous oxide (Cu 2 3. The generator of claim 2, wherein the oxide is copper (CuO), copper(II) oxide (CuO), or a combination thereof.

4. The generator of claim 1 , wherein the anti-fouling metallic material is coated on a surface of the SWC system strainer.

5. The generator of claim 1 , wherein the anti-fouling metallic material is plated on a surface of the SWC system strainer.

6. The generator of claim 1 , wherein the anti-fouling metallic material has a thickness of about 10 μm to about 100 μm.

7. The generator of claim 1 , wherein the anti-fouling metallic material covers substantially all of the surface of the SWC system strainer.

8. 1. A method for mitigating copper fouling in a stator water-cooled (SWC) system, the method comprising: a) identifying a component of the SWC system that is susceptible to copper oxide fouling, the component of the SWC system being a strainer made of stainless steel; b) applying an anti-fouling metallic material, which is Monel, brass, cupronickel, or a combination thereof, to the surface of the component identified in step (a), thereby mitigating copper fouling of the component.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein at the operating pH and temperature of the SWC system, the zeta potential of the anti-fouling metallic material has the same sign as the zeta potential of the fouling copper oxide.

10. The copper oxide is cuprous oxide (Cu 2 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the catalyst is copper (CuO), copper(II) oxide (CuO), or a combination thereof.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the fouling resistant metallic material is plated onto the components identified in step (a).

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the plating is electroplating.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the plating is electroless plating.

14. The method of claim 8, wherein the anti-fouling metallic material has a thickness of about 10 μm to about 100 μm after being applied to the surface of the component identified in step (a).

15. The method of claim 8 , wherein the fouling resistant metallic material is applied to substantially all of the surfaces of the component identified in step (a).

16. A fouling resistant component of a stator water cooling (SWC) system, the fouling resistant component being pretreated by the method of claim 8.

Images