Process quality evaluation method and device for government affair informatization project management, electronic equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The invention discloses a process quality evaluation method and device for government affair informatization project management, electronic equipment and a storage medium. The method comprises the following steps: in response to a project type selection instruction, determining a target project type to which a to-be-evaluated project belongs and a target process quality activity template matched with the target project type; in response to a standard setting instruction, setting a quality evaluation standard for each target activity in the target process quality activity template; acquiring associated basic quality data of each target activity corresponding to the to-be-evaluated project in real time, and inputting the associated basic quality data into the quality index evaluation model to calculate the actual quality condition of each target activity; and comparing the actual quality condition of each target activity with the quality evaluation standard of each target activity to evaluate the quality achievement degree of each target activity of the to-be-evaluated project. According to the technical scheme, the quality of the construction process of the government affair informatization project is conveniently and automatically managed.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of data processing technology, and in particular to a process quality evaluation method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for government information project management. Background Art

[0002] The quality management activities of software development projects should cover quality planning, quality assurance, quality control and other aspects to ensure that the project achieves the established quality goals in all aspects.

[0003] At present, the quality management functions provided by project management systems in the software development industry are generally only related to quality control (focusing on test plans, test cases, test defect management, online release review, etc.), and there are very few for quality planning and quality assurance. There is still no information system support for process quality management and evaluation of government information technology projects, which makes it difficult to implement, guide and monitor quality management activities in the construction process of government information technology projects. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present invention provides a process quality evaluation method, device, electronic device and storage medium for government information project management, so as to provide a process quality evaluation method for government information project management, which is convenient for automated management of the quality of the government information project construction process.

[0005] According to one aspect of the present invention, a process quality evaluation method for government information project management is provided, the method comprising:

[0006] In response to the project type selection instruction, determining the target project type to which the project to be evaluated belongs and the target process quality activity template matching the target project type;

[0007] In response to the standard setting instruction, setting a quality evaluation standard for each target activity in the target process quality activity template;

[0008] Collecting in real time the basic quality data associated with each target activity corresponding to the project to be evaluated, and inputting the basic quality data into the quality indicator evaluation model to calculate the actual quality of each target activity;

[0009] The actual quality of the various target activities is compared with the quality evaluation standards of the various target activities to evaluate the degree to which the quality of the various target activities of the project to be evaluated is achieved.

[0010] According to another aspect of the present invention, a process quality evaluation device for government information project management is provided, the device comprising:

[0011] A project type and activity template determination module, configured to determine, in response to a project type selection instruction, a target project type to which the project to be evaluated belongs and a target process quality activity template matching the target project type;

[0012] A quality evaluation standard setting module, used to set quality evaluation standards for each target activity in the target process quality activity template in response to a standard setting instruction;

[0013] An actual quality situation calculation module is used to collect in real time the associated basic quality data of various target activities corresponding to the project to be evaluated, and input the associated basic quality data into the quality indicator evaluation model to calculate the actual quality situation of the various target activities;

[0014] The quality achievement degree evaluation module is used to compare the actual quality of the various target activities with the quality evaluation standards of the various target activities to evaluate the quality achievement degree of the various target activities of the project to be evaluated.

[0015] According to another aspect of the present invention, an electronic device is provided, the electronic device comprising:

[0016] at least one processor; and

[0017] a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein,

[0018] The memory stores a computer program that can be executed by the at least one processor, and the computer program is executed by the at least one processor so that the at least one processor can execute the process quality evaluation method for government information project management described in any embodiment of the present invention.

[0019] According to another aspect of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores computer instructions, and the computer instructions are used to enable a processor to implement the process quality evaluation method for government information project management described in any embodiment of the present invention when executed.

[0020] The technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention determines the target project type of the project to be evaluated and the target process quality activity template matching the target project type in response to a project type selection instruction; sets quality evaluation standards for each target activity in the target process quality activity template in response to a standard setting instruction; collects the associated basic quality data of each target activity corresponding to the project to be evaluated in real time, and inputs the associated basic quality data into a quality indicator evaluation model to calculate the actual quality of each target activity; compares the actual quality of each target activity with the quality evaluation standard of each target activity to evaluate the degree of quality achievement of each target activity of the project to be evaluated, adopts a technical means of determining a corresponding template for the project to be evaluated, setting evaluation standards for various activities in the template, collecting basic quality data according to the evaluation standards, and using an evaluation model to perform actual quality evaluation based on the basic quality data, thereby providing a process quality evaluation method for government information project management, which is convenient for automated management of the quality of the government information project construction process.

[0021] It should be understood that the contents described in this section are not intended to identify the key or important features of the embodiments of the present invention, nor are they intended to limit the scope of the present invention. Other features of the present invention will become easily understood through the following description. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0022] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative work.

[0023] Figure 1 A flowchart of a process quality evaluation method for government information project management provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0024] Figure 2 A complete schematic diagram of a process quality evaluation method for government information project management provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0025] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of the structure of a process quality evaluation device for government information project management provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0026] Figure 4 It is a structural schematic diagram of an electronic device for implementing the process quality evaluation method for government information project management according to an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0027] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the scheme of the present invention, the technical scheme in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work should fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0028] It should be noted that the terms "including" and "having" and any variations thereof in the specification and claims of the present invention and the above-mentioned drawings are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions. For example, a process, method, system, product or apparatus comprising a series of steps or units is not necessarily limited to those steps or units clearly listed, but may include other steps or units that are not clearly listed or inherent to these processes, methods, products or apparatus.

[0029] Figure 1 The flowchart of a process quality evaluation method for government information project management provided by an embodiment of the present invention is applicable to the situation of monitoring and evaluating the process management activities of government information projects. The method can be executed by a process quality evaluation device for government information project management. The process quality evaluation device for government information project management can be implemented in the form of hardware and / or software. The process quality evaluation device for government information project management can be configured in a server integrated with a process quality evaluation system for government information project management. Figure 1 As shown, the method includes:

[0030] S110 . In response to a project type selection instruction, determine a target project type to which the project to be evaluated belongs and a target process quality activity template matching the target project type.

[0031] Among them, the project to be evaluated can refer to information technology projects such as software development, and can refer to government information technology projects. The projects to be evaluated generally include software development, infrastructure, operation, and maintenance projects. According to the requirements of information technology project management, different types of projects have different process management activity requirements. Therefore, the process quality evaluation system for government information technology project management can provide a template configuration function for the project. System managers can pre-define the process management activity template for each type of project, and support functions such as template addition, deletion, and modification.

[0032] The project type selection instruction may refer to the instruction generated by the project manager to select the project type for the system to be evaluated when creating the system to be evaluated through the process quality evaluation system of the government information project management. In this process, the process quality evaluation system of the government information project management can determine the target project type of the project to be evaluated when creating the system to be evaluated, and select the corresponding target process quality activity template for the project to be evaluated from the predefined process management activity templates of various types of projects.

[0033] In an optional implementation, in response to a project type selection instruction, determining the target project type of the project to be evaluated and the target process quality activity template that matches the target project type may include: determining the target project type of the project to be evaluated based on the project type identifier carried by the project type selection instruction; and determining the target process quality activity template that matches the target project type from the process quality activity templates pre-defined for each project type.

[0034] Exemplarily, system administrators of a process quality evaluation system for government information technology project management can add identifiers to project types when creating process quality activity templates for different types of projects, so that when project managers of the projects to be evaluated issue project type selection instructions, they can determine the target project type corresponding to the projects to be evaluated based on the project type identifiers carried therein, thereby determining the target process quality activity template among a variety of process quality activity templates.

[0035] S120. In response to the standard setting instruction, set a quality evaluation standard for each target activity in the target process quality activity template.

[0036] Among them, standard setting instructions can refer to instructions for setting evaluation standards for various quality activities of the project to be evaluated.

[0037] In an optional implementation, in response to a standard setting instruction, setting a quality evaluation standard for each target activity in a target process quality activity template may include: in response to a template adjustment instruction, adjusting the target process quality activity template to obtain a list of project process activities that matches the project to be evaluated; in response to a standard setting instruction, setting a quality evaluation standard for each target activity in the project process activity list.

[0038] The template adjustment instruction may refer to an adjustment instruction for the target process quality activity template, and the adjustment action may include operations such as adding, deleting, and modifying. In this embodiment, according to the adjustment operation specified by the template adjustment instruction, operations such as adding, deleting, and modifying can be performed on various activities in the predefined target process quality activities to obtain a project process activity list that is consistent with the actual situation of the project to be evaluated, and quality evaluation standards are set for each target activity in the project process activity list to achieve the quality evaluation standard setting of the project to be evaluated.

[0039] The quality evaluation criteria for each target activity may include required deliverables and required quality indicators. Required deliverables may refer to reference evaluation materials for each target activity. Required quality indicators may refer to quality evaluation parameters for each target activity.

[0040] In this embodiment, after completing the setting of the project process activity list, the managers of the project to be evaluated need to set the quality standards for each activity, including the deliverables to be submitted and the quality indicators to be achieved by the activity. For example, in a software development project, for the process activity of software testing, it can be set that the deliverables must include "test plan", "test case" and "test report", and the relevant quality indicators can be set as "test case coverage" with a passing standard of 100%, "residual defect rate" with a passing standard of 10%, "core test case pass rate" with a passing standard of 100%, etc.

[0041] By designing quality evaluation indicators that match process activities, the quality of each process activity can be evaluated. By pre-establishing quality evaluation indicators through the system and associating them with each process activity, quantitative quality evaluation of the degree of execution of process activities can be achieved based on preset mathematical models, which changes the traditional quality evaluation of process activities in "existence or absence" in quality assurance work.

[0042] Optionally, each target activity has a corresponding activity attribute. Based on the above optional implementation, in response to a template adjustment instruction, adjusting the target process quality activity template to obtain a list of project process activities that matches the project to be evaluated may include: in the case where the activity attribute of the activity to be adjusted in the target process quality activity template is a key quality activity, triggering an approval process in response to the template adjustment instruction, and adjusting the activity to be adjusted in the target process quality activity template after the approval result is passed.

[0043] Among them, each target activity can have pre-defined activity attributes, such as routine quality activities and key quality activities.

[0044] In this embodiment, in order to meet the mixed projects existing in actual situations, for example, a project has both software development and operation services, it can support the flexible addition of process management activities of other types of projects from the template library based on a certain type of project process management activity template, and customize the combination into a personalized project process management activity list that can meet the actual business scenario. That is, the managers of the project to be criticized can adjust the process quality activities in the target process quality activity template by adding, deleting, and modifying, including cutting the quality activities in the template and selecting specific quality activities from other project type templates, and finally forming the project process quality activity standard of the project. It should be noted that when the cut quality activity belongs to the "key quality activity", the approval process can be triggered. After approval by the designated personnel, the cut key quality activity will be deleted from the template. At the same time, the cutting record, cutting reason and approval record can be recorded by the system. When the cut quality activity belongs to the "conventional quality activity", it can be cut directly without triggering the approval process. At the same time, the cutting record, cutting reason and approval record can also be recorded by the system.

[0045] Optionally, during the implementation of the government information technology project, the system can combine the project milestone plan to send reminders to project managers through emails, internal messages, corporate WeChat, etc. before the agreed execution time of each process activity, explaining the process activity requirements.

[0046] Optionally, the system can also provide a knowledge management function module. The system administrator provides excellent practical experience for each type of project process activities, including templates, samples, and writing guidelines for relevant deliverables, processes and guidelines related to process activities, etc., to provide process activity guidance for project managers. The system administrator can grant access to the knowledge base for different roles, including viewing and downloading permissions.

[0047] S130, collecting in real time the associated basic quality data of various target activities corresponding to the project to be evaluated, and inputting the associated basic quality data into the quality indicator evaluation model to calculate the actual quality of various target activities.

[0048] Among them, the associated basic quality data may refer to the project data used to support the quality evaluation of the target activities. Exemplarily, the associated basic quality data may include but are not limited to the deliverables of each project in the collection document center; the status of each project requirement in the requirement management module; the results of the design review process; the coverage and execution of test cases; the test defect data and status; the results of the online release review process; third-party evaluation data; user opinion data; operation and maintenance inspection data; the archiving status of deliverables (such as code), etc.

[0049] In an optional implementation, the associated basic quality data of each target activity corresponding to the project to be evaluated is collected in real time, and the associated basic quality data is input into the quality indicator evaluation model to calculate the actual quality status of each target activity. This may include: collecting the associated basic quality data of each target activity that matches the required quality indicators in real time; using the quality indicator evaluation model that matches the required quality indicators to calculate the associated basic quality data that matches the required quality indicators, and obtain the actual quality status of each target activity in the project process activity list.

[0050] In this embodiment, the basic quality data can be imported into the quality indicator evaluation model, and the actual quality of each process activity can be calculated according to the preset mathematical model of each quality indicator.

[0051] S140. Compare the actual quality of each target activity with the quality evaluation standard of each target activity to evaluate the degree of achievement of the quality of each target activity of the project to be evaluated.

[0052] In this embodiment, the actual quality of each target activity can be compared with the quality target (ie, quality evaluation standard) set when the project activity is created, so as to evaluate the degree to which the quality of the process activity is achieved.

[0053] The technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention determines the target project type of the project to be evaluated and the target process quality activity template matching the target project type in response to a project type selection instruction; sets quality evaluation standards for each target activity in the target process quality activity template in response to a standard setting instruction; collects the associated basic quality data of each target activity corresponding to the project to be evaluated in real time, and inputs the associated basic quality data into a quality indicator evaluation model to calculate the actual quality of each target activity; compares the actual quality of each target activity with the quality evaluation standard of each target activity to evaluate the degree of quality achievement of each target activity of the project to be evaluated, adopts a technical means of determining a corresponding template for the project to be evaluated, setting evaluation standards for various activities in the template, collecting basic quality data according to the evaluation standards, and using an evaluation model to perform actual quality evaluation based on the basic quality data, thereby providing a process quality evaluation method for government information project management, which is convenient for automated management of the quality of the government information project construction process.

[0054] Optionally, based on the quality achievement of each target activity, a process activity quality evaluation report is generated for the project to be evaluated; the process activity quality evaluation report is pushed to the managers of the project to be evaluated.

[0055] In this embodiment, a project process activity quality evaluation report can be generated based on the degree of quality achievement of each target activity in the project to be evaluated, and can be further pushed to project managers and relevant stakeholders through emails, station messages, corporate WeChat, etc. The content of the pushed project process activity quality evaluation report may include an overall score for the quality of project process activities, details of the overall process activities, classified statistics on the execution of process activities, risk analysis and response measures, etc.

[0056] Optionally, after comparing the actual quality of each target activity with the quality evaluation standard of each target activity, it can also include: recording the target activities in each target activity that do not meet the quality evaluation standard; pushing the recording results to the managers of the projects to be evaluated to prompt the managers to improve the target activities that do not meet the quality evaluation standard.

[0057] In this embodiment, project process quality risks can be automatically imported into the project risk management module. Activities that fail to meet quality assessment standards will be synchronously recorded in each project risk list, and their risk type will be defined as "process quality risk", thereby regularly reminding project managers to pay attention and promote process quality risk improvement and closure.

[0058] Optionally, this embodiment can also provide an information project process quality risk view. Figure 1 Function of one-click query: The basic quality data of project process activities and the quality indicator evaluation results are constructed into a project process quality risk view. Information project managers and relevant stakeholders can view it with one click to understand the specific process quality status and risks of the project.

[0059] This embodiment can also continuously improve the government informationization project process management activity template: summarize the execution status of each project process activity, identify the maturity (advantages and disadvantages) of each link of the informationization project, adjust the project process management activity guidelines and requirements according to the development strategy and quality policy, and add, delete, and modify activities in the process management template in order to find the best practice process management model that is more suitable for the current situation.

[0060] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the process quality evaluation method of project management in this embodiment, Figure 2 A complete schematic diagram of a process quality evaluation method for government information project management provided by an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2 As shown, the method includes:

[0061] S1. The system presets process management activity templates for different types of government information technology projects: presets a list of project management activities based on the requirements of government information technology project management, and combines process management activity templates by project type.

[0062] S2. Set a list of process activities: match the process activity management template according to the project type, and perform customized operations such as addition, deletion, and modification based on the process activity template according to the actual requirements of the project, and further set quality standards for project activities.

[0063] S3. Design quality evaluation indicators that match process activities: The design of activity quality evaluation indicators is achieved by designing process activity-related business data and collection methods, designing process activity-related indicator algorithms, and designing process activity-related indicator alarm thresholds.

[0064] S4. Real-time collection of quality data generated by process activities (i.e. associated basic quality data): collect business scenarios and business data according to the collection frequency to support the process management business functions of government information technology projects.

[0065] S5. Process activity guidance: The project managers can be reminded of the process activity requirements in conjunction with the project milestone plan, and process activity empowerment can be achieved through the knowledge management module and file download center.

[0066] S6. Process activity quality evaluation: Evaluate the collected quality data using the corresponding evaluation algorithm (i.e., quality indicator evaluation model).

[0067] S7. Automatically push process activity quality reports: Generate a quality evaluation report for the government informationization project based on the evaluation results of each process activity of the project, and push the quality evaluation report through email, WeChat, internal messages, etc.

[0068] S8. Risk assessment of process quality of government information projects Figure 1 Key-checkable: Risks can be displayed at the single project level, and further displayed as a whole at the organizational level.

[0069] S9. Closed-loop improvement of process quality risk in government information technology projects: If there are activities in the project that do not meet quality standards, risk registration, risk measures setting and risk closed-loop tracking will be carried out.

[0070] S10. Optimization of activity templates for process management of government information technology projects: Identify the maturity of each link of government information technology projects at the organizational level in order to update the activity list and activity templates.

[0071] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a process quality evaluation device for government information project management provided by an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 3 As shown, the device includes: a project type and activity template determination module 310, a quality evaluation standard setting module 320, an actual quality situation calculation module 330 and a quality achievement degree evaluation module 340. Among them:

[0072] A project type and activity template determination module 310 is used to determine the target project type of the project to be evaluated and the target process quality activity template matching the target project type in response to the project type selection instruction;

[0073] The quality evaluation standard setting module 320 is used to set the quality evaluation standard for each target activity in the target process quality activity template in response to the standard setting instruction;

[0074] The actual quality situation calculation module 330 is used to collect the associated basic quality data of each target activity corresponding to the project to be evaluated in real time, and input the associated basic quality data into the quality indicator evaluation model to calculate the actual quality situation of each target activity;

[0075] The quality achievement degree evaluation module 340 is used to compare the actual quality of the various target activities with the quality evaluation standards of the various target activities to evaluate the quality achievement degree of the various target activities of the project to be evaluated.

[0076] The technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention determines the target project type of the project to be evaluated and the target process quality activity template matching the target project type in response to a project type selection instruction; sets quality evaluation standards for each target activity in the target process quality activity template in response to a standard setting instruction; collects the associated basic quality data of each target activity corresponding to the project to be evaluated in real time, and inputs the associated basic quality data into a quality indicator evaluation model to calculate the actual quality of each target activity; compares the actual quality of each target activity with the quality evaluation standard of each target activity to evaluate the degree of quality achievement of each target activity of the project to be evaluated, adopts a technical means of determining a corresponding template for the project to be evaluated, setting evaluation standards for various activities in the template, collecting basic quality data according to the evaluation standards, and using an evaluation model to perform actual quality evaluation based on the basic quality data, thereby providing a process quality evaluation method for government information project management, which is convenient for automated management of the quality of the government information project construction process.

[0077] Optionally, the project type and activity template determination module 310 may be specifically used for:

[0078] Determining the target project type of the project to be evaluated according to the project type identifier carried by the project type selection instruction;

[0079] A target process quality activity template matching the target project type is determined from process quality activity templates pre-defined for each project type.

[0080] Optionally, the quality evaluation standard setting module 320 may include:

[0081] A project process activity list acquisition unit, configured to adjust the target process quality activity template in response to a template adjustment instruction to acquire a project process activity list matching the project to be evaluated;

[0082] The quality evaluation standard setting unit is used to set the quality evaluation standard for each target activity in the project process activity list in response to the standard setting instruction.

[0083] Optionally, the quality evaluation criteria set for each target activity include required deliverables and required quality indicators;

[0084] The actual quality situation calculation module 330 can be specifically used for:

[0085] Collect relevant basic quality data matching the required quality indicators in each target activity in real time;

[0086] The quality indicator evaluation model that matches the required quality indicator is used to calculate the associated basic quality data that matches the required quality indicator to obtain the actual quality status of each target activity in the project process activity list.

[0087] Optionally, each target activity has corresponding activity attributes;

[0088] The project process activity list acquisition unit can be used for:

[0089] When the activity attribute of the activity to be adjusted in the target process quality activity template is a key quality activity, the approval process is triggered in response to the template adjustment instruction. After the approval result is passed, the activity to be adjusted in the target process quality activity template is adjusted.

[0090] Optionally, the process quality evaluation device for government information project management further includes a quality evaluation report push module for:

[0091] Generate a process activity quality evaluation report for the project to be evaluated based on the quality achievement of each target activity;

[0092] The process activity quality evaluation report is pushed to the management personnel of the project to be evaluated.

[0093] Optionally, the process quality evaluation device for government information project management further includes an activity improvement module, which is used to compare the actual quality of each target activity with the quality evaluation standard of each target activity:

[0094] Record the target activities that fail to meet the quality evaluation standards among the target activities;

[0095] The recorded results are pushed to the managers of the project to be evaluated to prompt the managers to improve the target activities that do not meet the quality evaluation standards.

[0096] The process quality evaluation device for government informationization project management provided by the embodiment of the present invention can execute the process quality evaluation method for government informationization project management provided by any embodiment of the present invention, and has the corresponding functional modules and beneficial effects of the execution method.

[0097] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of an electronic device 400 that can be used to implement an embodiment of the present invention is shown. The electronic device is intended to represent various forms of digital computers or various forms of mobile devices. The components shown herein, their connections and relationships, and their functions are merely examples and are not intended to limit the implementation of the present invention described and / or required herein.

[0098] like Figure 4 As shown, the electronic device 400 includes at least one processor 401, and a memory connected to the at least one processor 401 in communication, such as a read-only memory (ROM) 402, a random access memory (RAM) 403, etc., wherein the memory stores a computer program that can be executed by at least one processor, and the processor 401 can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to the computer program stored in the read-only memory (ROM) 402 or the computer program loaded from the storage unit 408 to the random access memory (RAM) 403. In the RAM 403, various programs and data required for the operation of the electronic device 400 can also be stored. The processor 401, the ROM 402, and the RAM 403 are connected to each other via a bus 404. An input / output (I / O) interface 405 is also connected to the bus 404.

[0099] Multiple components in the electronic device 400 are connected to the I / O interface 405, including: an input unit 406, such as a keyboard, a mouse, etc.; an output unit 407, such as various types of displays, speakers, etc.; a storage unit 408, such as a disk, an optical disk, etc.; and a communication unit 409, such as a network card, a modem, a wireless communication transceiver, etc. The communication unit 409 allows the electronic device 400 to exchange information / data with other devices through a computer network such as the Internet and / or various telecommunication networks.

[0100] Processor 401 may be a variety of general and / or special processing components with processing and computing capabilities. Some examples of processor 401 include, but are not limited to, a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), various special artificial intelligence (AI) computing chips, various processors running machine learning model algorithms, digital signal processors (DSPs), and any appropriate processors, controllers, microcontrollers, etc. Processor 401 executes the various methods and processes described above, such as a process quality evaluation method for government information project management.

[0101] In some embodiments, the process quality evaluation method for government information technology project management can be implemented as a computer program, which is tangibly contained in a computer-readable storage medium, such as a storage unit 408. In some embodiments, part or all of the computer program can be loaded and / or installed on the electronic device 400 via the ROM 402 and / or the communication unit 409. When the computer program is loaded into the RAM 403 and executed by the processor 401, one or more steps of the process quality evaluation method for government information technology project management described above can be performed. Alternatively, in other embodiments, the processor 401 can be configured to execute the process quality evaluation method for government information technology project management in any other appropriate manner (for example, by means of firmware).

[0102] Various implementations of the systems and techniques described above herein can be implemented in digital electronic circuit systems, integrated circuit systems, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), application specific standard products (ASSPs), systems on chips (SOCs), load programmable logic devices (CPLDs), computer hardware, firmware, software, and / or combinations thereof. These various implementations can include: being implemented in one or more computer programs that can be executed and / or interpreted on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor, which can be a special purpose or general purpose programmable processor that can receive data and instructions from a storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device, and transmit data and instructions to the storage system, the at least one input device, and the at least one output device.

[0103] Computer programs for implementing the methods of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages. These computer programs may be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, or other programmable data processing device, so that when the computer program is executed by the processor, the functions / operations specified in the flow chart and / or block diagram are implemented. The computer program may be executed entirely on the machine, partially on the machine, partially on the machine and partially on a remote machine as a stand-alone software package, or entirely on a remote machine or server.

[0104] In the context of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium may be a tangible medium that may contain or store a computer program for use by or in combination with an instruction execution system, device or equipment. A computer-readable storage medium may include, but is not limited to, electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor systems, devices or equipment, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. Alternatively, a computer-readable storage medium may be a machine-readable signal medium. A more specific example of a machine-readable storage medium may include an electrical connection based on one or more lines, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

[0105] To provide interaction with a user, the systems and techniques described herein may be implemented on an electronic device having: a display device (e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor) for displaying information to the user; and a keyboard and a pointing device (e.g., a mouse or trackball) through which the user can provide input to the electronic device. Other types of devices may also be used to provide interaction with the user; for example, the feedback provided to the user may be any form of sensory feedback (e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback); and input from the user may be received in any form (including acoustic input, voice input, or tactile input).

[0106] The systems and techniques described herein may be implemented in a computing system that includes backend components (e.g., as a data server), or a computing system that includes middleware components (e.g., an application server), or a computing system that includes frontend components (e.g., a user computer with a graphical user interface or a web browser through which a user can interact with implementations of the systems and techniques described herein), or a computing system that includes any combination of such backend components, middleware components, or frontend components. The components of the system may be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication (e.g., a communication network). Examples of communication networks include: a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a blockchain network, and the Internet.

[0107] A computing system may include a client and a server. The client and the server are generally remote from each other and usually interact through a communication network. The client and server relationship is generated by computer programs running on the corresponding computers and having a client-server relationship with each other. The server may be a cloud server, also known as a cloud computing server or cloud host, which is a host product in the cloud computing service system to solve the defects of difficult management and weak business scalability in traditional physical hosts and VPS services.

[0108] It should be understood that the various forms of processes shown above can be used to reorder, add or delete steps. For example, the steps described in the present invention can be executed in parallel, sequentially or in different orders, as long as the desired results of the technical solution of the present invention can be achieved, and this document does not limit this.

[0109] The above specific implementations do not constitute a limitation on the protection scope of the present invention. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications, combinations, sub-combinations and substitutions can be made according to design requirements and other factors. Any modification, equivalent substitution and improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A process quality evaluation method for government information project management, characterized in that: include: In response to the project type selection instruction, determining the target project type to which the project to be evaluated belongs and the target process quality activity template matching the target project type; In response to the standard setting instruction, setting a quality evaluation standard for each target activity in the target process quality activity template; Collecting in real time the basic quality data associated with each target activity corresponding to the project to be evaluated, and inputting the basic quality data into the quality indicator evaluation model to calculate the actual quality of each target activity; The actual quality of the various target activities is compared with the quality evaluation standards of the various target activities to evaluate the degree to which the quality of the various target activities of the project to be evaluated is achieved.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that In response to the project type selection instruction, determining the target project type of the project to be evaluated and the target process quality activity template matching the target project type includes: Determining the target project type of the project to be evaluated according to the project type identifier carried by the project type selection instruction; A target process quality activity template matching the target project type is determined from process quality activity templates pre-defined for each project type.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: In response to the standard setting instruction, setting quality evaluation standards for each target activity in the target process quality activity template includes: In response to the template adjustment instruction, adjusting the target process quality activity template to obtain a project process activity list matching the project to be evaluated; In response to the standard setting instruction, a quality evaluation standard is set for each target activity in the project process activity list.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that The quality evaluation standards for each target activity include required deliverables and required quality indicators; Collecting the basic quality data associated with each target activity corresponding to the project to be evaluated in real time, and inputting the basic quality data into the quality indicator evaluation model to calculate the actual quality of each target activity, including: Collect relevant basic quality data matching the required quality indicators in each target activity in real time; The quality indicator evaluation model that matches the required quality indicator is used to calculate the associated basic quality data that matches the required quality indicator to obtain the actual quality status of each target activity in the project process activity list.

5. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that: Each target activity has corresponding activity attributes; In response to the template adjustment instruction, adjusting the target process quality activity template to obtain a project process activity list matching the project to be evaluated includes: When the activity attribute of the activity to be adjusted in the target process quality activity template is a key quality activity, the approval process is triggered in response to the template adjustment instruction. After the approval result is passed, the activity to be adjusted in the target process quality activity template is adjusted.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Also includes: Generate a process activity quality evaluation report for the project to be evaluated based on the quality achievement of each target activity; The process activity quality evaluation report is pushed to the management personnel of the project to be evaluated.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that After comparing the actual quality of each target activity with the quality evaluation standard of each target activity, it also includes: Record the target activities that fail to meet the quality evaluation standards among the target activities; The recorded results are pushed to the managers of the project to be evaluated to prompt the managers to improve the target activities that do not meet the quality evaluation standards.

8. A process quality evaluation device for government information project management, characterized in that: include: A project type and activity template determination module, configured to determine, in response to a project type selection instruction, a target project type to which the project to be evaluated belongs and a target process quality activity template matching the target project type; A quality evaluation standard setting module, used to set quality evaluation standards for each target activity in the target process quality activity template in response to a standard setting instruction; An actual quality situation calculation module is used to collect in real time the associated basic quality data of various target activities corresponding to the project to be evaluated, and input the associated basic quality data into the quality indicator evaluation model to calculate the actual quality situation of the various target activities; The quality achievement degree evaluation module is used to compare the actual quality of the various target activities with the quality evaluation standards of the various target activities to evaluate the quality achievement degree of the various target activities of the project to be evaluated.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: The electronic device comprises: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein, The memory stores a computer program that can be executed by the at least one processor, and the computer program is executed by the at least one processor so that the at least one processor can execute the process quality evaluation method for government information project management described in any one of claims 1-7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores computer instructions, and the computer instructions are used to enable a processor to implement the process quality evaluation method for government information project management according to any one of claims 1 to 7 when executed.

Images