Element penetration and mechanical data inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software

Abstract

The present invention discloses an element penetration inspection method and a mechanical data over-standard inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software, wherein the element penetration inspection method comprises: using computer-aided engineering software to perform a drop analysis on a test object according to a setting file and generate a drop analysis file, extracting multiple offset coordinates in the drop analysis file, feeding the multiple offset coordinates into the computer-aided engineering software for interference inspection, analyzing whether multiple interference results of the interference inspection exceed a preset threshold, and updating the setting file of the computer-aided engineering software according to each interference result exceeding the preset threshold. By using the element penetration inspection method and mechanical data inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software of the embodiment of the present invention, the element penetration situation and the mechanical data over-standard situation can be quickly confirmed with the assistance of the inspection software.

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to the application of computer-aided engineering (CAE) software, in particular to an element penetration inspection method and a mechanical data over-standard inspection method based on the computer-aided engineering software. [Background technology]

[0002] In order to ensure that future manufactured products can meet application standards, the industry currently often uses computer-aided engineering (CAE) software to assist in various simulation analyses of test objects, such as fall simulation analysis. However, the current CAE software cannot perform interference checks on test objects after the analysis is completed, and the interference conditions between components must be observed one by one by the naked eye. In addition, the current CAE software requires manual opening of each component one by one to confirm the stress and strain exceeding the standard. [Summary of the invention]

[0003] In one embodiment, the present invention provides an element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software, comprising: using the computer-aided engineering software to perform a drop analysis on a test object according to a setting file and generate a drop analysis file; extracting multiple offset coordinates in the drop analysis file; feeding these offset coordinates into the computer-aided engineering software for interference checking; analyzing whether multiple interference results of the interference check exceed a preset threshold; and updating the setting file of the computer-aided engineering software according to each interference result that exceeds the preset threshold.

[0004] In one embodiment, the present invention provides a mechanical data inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software, comprising: reading a parameter standard file; extracting multiple mechanical data results of multiple detection components from a fall analysis file of the computer-aided engineering software; comparing these mechanical data results of each detection component with multiple parameter standards in the parameter standard file to screen out at least one component that exceeds the standard; and generating a mechanical data analysis report based on these mechanical data results of at least one component that exceeds the standard.

[0005] In summary, the element penetration inspection method and mechanical data inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software of the embodiment of the present invention can quickly confirm the element penetration situation and the mechanical data exceeding the standard situation with the assistance of the inspection software. In particular, the element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software of the embodiment of the present invention automatically feeds multiple offset coordinates in the fall analysis file into the computer-aided engineering software to automatically perform element penetration inspection, reduce manpower and avoid human negligence, and can automatically update the setting file based on the inspection results and then re-cycle the calculation. In addition, the mechanical data inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software of the embodiment of the present invention can automatically extract multiple mechanical data results in the fall analysis file to perform damage confirmation of the detection component, reduce manpower and avoid human negligence, and thus improve work efficiency.

[0006] The detailed features and advantages of the present invention are described in detail in the following embodiments, and the contents are sufficient to enable any person skilled in the relevant art to understand the technical content of the present invention and implement it accordingly. Moreover, according to the contents disclosed in this specification, the scope of the patent application and the drawings, any person skilled in the relevant art can easily understand the relevant purposes and advantages of the present invention.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0007] Figure 1 A block diagram of an embodiment of a system.

[0008] Figure 2 The figure is a flow chart of an embodiment of an element penetration inspection method.

[0009] Figure 3 for Figure 2 Schematic diagram of a flow chart of an embodiment of step S120 in FIG.

[0010] Figure 4 for Figure 2 Schematic diagram of a flow chart of an embodiment of step S170 in FIG.

[0011] Figure 5 A schematic flow chart of an embodiment of a mechanical data checking method.

[0012] Figure 6 for Figure 5 Schematic diagram of a flow chart of an embodiment of step S250 in FIG. [Specific implementation method]

[0013] In order to make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention more obvious and understandable, the following is a detailed description with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0014] Figure 1 FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a system. Figure 1 , the element penetration inspection method of any embodiment of the present invention and the mechanical data inspection method of any embodiment of the present invention can be implemented by a non-transitory computer-readable recording medium device 100. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium device 100 can be used to store an inspection software 110, so that when the electronic device 200 loads and executes the inspection software 110, the inspection software 110 can enable the electronic device 200 to execute the element penetration inspection method of any embodiment of the present invention and / or the mechanical data inspection method of any embodiment of the present invention. In addition, the non-transitory computer-readable recording medium device 100 can also store a computer-aided engineering software 120 (Computer Aided Engineering, CAE), but the present invention is not limited to this, and the computer-aided engineering software 120 can also be stored in another non-transitory computer-readable recording medium device.

[0015] In some embodiments, the non-transitory computer-readable recording media device 100 may be a storage device inside the electronic device 200. In some implementations, the storage device may be implemented by one or more storage elements, and each storage element may be, but is not limited to, a non-volatile memory, such as a read-only memory (ROM) or a flash memory, or a volatile memory, such as a random access memory (RAM). In other embodiments, the non-transitory computer-readable recording media device 100 may be a remote storage element, and is transmitted to the electronic device 200 by wire or wireless means. In yet other embodiments, the non-transitory computer-readable recording media device 100 may be a storage element outside the electronic device 200, and is connected and accessed through a reader or connector of the electronic device 200 to store and access the program code of the storage element.

[0016] In one embodiment, the inspection software 110 may include an inspection program 111 and a detection program 112. In some implementations, the inspection software 110 may be written in Python, but the present invention is not limited thereto. The inspection software 110 may also be written in C++ or other applicable programming languages.

[0017] Figure 2 FIG. 1 is a flow chart of an embodiment of an element penetration inspection method. Figure 1 and Figure 2 , below, it is first described how the electronic device 200 executes the element penetration inspection method based on the computer-aided engineering software 120.

[0018] In one embodiment of the element penetration inspection method, the electronic device 200 may first enable the computer-aided engineering software 120, and use the computer-aided engineering software 120 to perform a drop analysis on the test object according to the setting file F1 to simulate the damage of the test object when it is impacted after falling. After completing the drop analysis, the computer-aided engineering software 120 may generate a drop analysis file F2 according to the simulation test results (step S110).

[0019] In some embodiments, the geometric shape of the test object can be designed by the user, and the test object can include multiple components. In one embodiment of step S110, before performing the fall analysis, the computer-aided engineering software 120 can first grid each component of the test object to grid each component into multiple elements. In addition, the user can place the material properties of each component of the test object, the relevant analysis boundary conditions, and the specified time and other analysis data into the setting file F1. In some embodiments, the aforementioned analysis boundary conditions may include initial temperature, load, initial speed, contact conditions, damage conditions, etc. In addition, the specified time can be a single time point, such as 6 milliseconds (ms) or include multiple continuous time points, such as 1 millisecond, 2 milliseconds, 3 milliseconds...6 milliseconds. It should be noted that the value of the specified time and the time interval between consecutive time points are not limited to this, and the value of the specified time and the time interval depend on the test requirements.

[0020] In one embodiment of step S110, the computer-aided engineering software 120 can use its solver, such as but not limited to the LS-DYNA solver, to solve the test object for a specified time according to the setting file F1 to complete the fall analysis, and the computer-aided engineering software 120 can generate the fall analysis file F2 according to the solution result at the specified time.

[0021] Next, the electronic device 200 may obtain the fall analysis file F2 generated by the CAM software 120 through the inspection program 111 of the inspection software 110 , and extract a plurality of offset coordinates in the fall analysis file F2 through the inspection program 111 (step S120 ).

[0022] In some embodiments, before executing step S120, the electronic device 200 may also monitor whether the fall analysis of the computer-aided engineering software 120 has been completed by the detection program 112 of the inspection software 110 (step S130), and only after the detection program 112 detects that the fall analysis of the computer-aided engineering software 120 has been completed, the detection program 112 causes the inspection program 111 to execute step S120. In some implementations, the computer-aided engineering software 120 may generate an analysis end signal after completing the fall analysis, and the detection program 112 may determine whether the fall analysis of the computer-aided engineering software 120 has been completed based on whether the analysis end signal is detected. In addition, the detection program 112 may be implemented by a python watchdog, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

[0023] Figure 3 for Figure 2 A flowchart of an embodiment of step S120 in FIG. Figures 1 to 3In one embodiment of step S120, the checking program 111 can obtain the node information of each component of the test object at the specified time from the fall analysis file F2 (step S121), and the checking program 111 can generate the node code of all components of the test object at the specified time according to the node information of each component at the specified time (step S122). Among them, the node information of each component at the specified time includes the three-axis coordinates of all nodes of each component at the specified time, and all nodes of each component refer to the endpoints of all elements meshed on each component. In addition, the three-axis coordinates of all nodes of these components at the specified time are the multiple offset coordinates described in the aforementioned step S120.

[0024] For example, assuming that the designated time is a single time point, such as when the designated time is 6 milliseconds, the checking program 111 can obtain the node information of each component at 6 milliseconds from the fall analysis file F2 in step S121, and the checking program 111 can generate the node code of all components of the test object at 6 milliseconds based on the node information of each component at 6 milliseconds in step S122. For another example, assuming that the designated time includes multiple consecutive time points, such as 1 millisecond, 2 milliseconds, 3 milliseconds to 6 milliseconds, the checking program 111 can obtain the node information of each component at 1 millisecond, the node information of each component at 2 milliseconds, the node information of each component at 3 milliseconds...the node information of each component at 6 milliseconds from the fall analysis file F2 in step S121. Furthermore, in step S122, the inspection program 111 can generate the node code of all components of the test object at 1 millisecond based on the node information of each component at 1 millisecond, generate the node code of all components of the test object at 2 milliseconds based on the node information of each component at 2 milliseconds, generate the node code of all components of the test object at 3 milliseconds based on the node information of each component at 3 milliseconds… and generate the node code of all components of the test object at 6 milliseconds based on the node information of each component at 6 milliseconds.

[0025] After obtaining a plurality of offset coordinates in step S120, the checking program 111 may feed these offset coordinates into the CAD software 120 to perform interference checking (step S140). In one embodiment of step S140, the checking program 111 outputs the node code at the designated time in step S122 to the CAD software 120, so that the CAD software 120 loads the node code at the designated time to perform interference checking at the designated time.

[0026] For example, assuming that the specified time is a single time point, such as when the specified time is 6 milliseconds, the inspection program 111 can directly output the node code of the specified time to the computer-aided engineering software 120 in step S140, and open the pre-processing software of the computer-aided engineering software 120 in background mode, such as but not limited to Hypermesh to load the node code of the specified time to calculate the interference check of the offset position at 6 milliseconds.

[0027] For another example, assuming that the designated time includes a plurality of consecutive time points, such as 1 millisecond, 2 milliseconds, 3 milliseconds to 6 milliseconds, the checking program 111 may output the node code of the designated time to the computer-aided engineering software 120 in batches in step S140, so that the computer-aided engineering software 120 may load the node code of the designated time in batches to perform the interference check of the designated time in batches. For example, the checking program 111 may first output the node code of 1 millisecond to the computer-aided engineering software 120, and start the pre-processing software of the computer-aided engineering software 120 in background mode, such as but not limited to Hypermesh to load the node code of 1 millisecond to calculate the interference check of the offset position at 1 millisecond. After completing the interference check of the offset position at 1 millisecond, the check program 111 outputs the node code of 2 milliseconds to the computer-aided engineering software 120, and starts the pre-processing software of the computer-aided engineering software 120 in background mode, such as but not limited to Hypermesh to load the node code of 2 milliseconds to calculate the interference check of the offset position at 2 milliseconds. This process is repeated until the interference check of the offset position at 6 milliseconds is completed.

[0028] After completing the interference check of step S140, the computer-aided engineering software 120 can obtain multiple interference results, and the computer-aided engineering software 120 can analyze these interference results to confirm whether each interference result exceeds a preset threshold (step S150). Among them, each interference result is the element interference depth between any two components. Here, each interference result is an interference result at a specified time. For example, assuming that the specified time is a single time point, such as when the specified time is 6 milliseconds, these interference results described in step S150 are all interference results at 6 milliseconds. For another example, assuming that the specified time includes multiple consecutive time points, such as 1 millisecond, 2 milliseconds, 3 milliseconds to 6 milliseconds, these interference results described in step S150 include interference results at 1 millisecond, interference results at 2 milliseconds, interference results at 3 milliseconds... and interference results at 6 milliseconds. In some embodiments, the preset threshold may be 0.1 millimeter (mm), but its value is not limited to this.

[0029] In one embodiment of step S150, when the computer-aided engineering software 120 determines that the element interference depth between two components is greater than a preset threshold, the two components can be defined as interfering, and the checking program 111 will record the interference result of the specified time. For example, assuming that the element interference depth between component number 114 and component number 112 is greater than the preset threshold at the specified time of 3 milliseconds, it means that component number 114 and component number 112 are an interfering component pair, so the checking program 111 can record the interfering component pair 114-112 (i.e., component number 114 to component number 112) that appears at 3 milliseconds. In addition, the checking program 111 can also record the number of elements whose element interference depth is greater than the preset threshold. For example, assuming that at the specified time of 3 milliseconds, there are 12 elements between component number 114 and component number 112 whose element interference depth is greater than the preset threshold, the inspection program 111 can record all the interfering component pairs 114-112 (i.e., component number 114 versus component number 112) that appear at 3 milliseconds and whose number of interfering elements is 12.

[0030] After completing the analysis of step S150 , the electronic device 200 may utilize the checking program 111 to update the setting file F1 for the CAM software 120 according to each interference result exceeding a preset threshold (step S160 ).

[0031] In some embodiments, before executing step S160 , the electronic device 200 may further generate an interference result report (step S170 ) through the checking program 111 according to the analysis of multiple interference results of the interference check in step S150 .

[0032] Figure 4 for Figure 2 A flowchart of an embodiment of step S170 in FIG. Figures 1 to 4 In one embodiment of step S170, the inspection program 111 can generate an interference component number matching result (step S171) based on each interference result exceeding a preset threshold, and generate an interference result report (step S172) based on the interference component number matching result.

[0033] In one embodiment of step S171, the checking program 111 can compare the interference results at the specified time and delete the duplicate items to generate the interference component number matching result. For example, if the interference component pair 114-112 appears at 3 milliseconds (i.e., component number 114 is matched with component number 112) and the interference component pair 112-114 appears at 3 milliseconds (i.e., component number 112 is matched with component number 114), the checking program 111 will determine that the interference component pair 114-112 and the interference component pair 112-114 are duplicate items and delete one of them, for example, delete the interference component pair 112-114. After the entire comparison process, all the remaining items (i.e., the remaining interference component pairs that appear at the specified time) are the interference component number matching results. In one embodiment of step S172, the interference result report can be an Excel file, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

[0034] In one embodiment of step S160, the inspection program 111 can add corresponding setting conditions, such as corresponding setting codes, to the setting file F1 of the computer-aided engineering software 120 according to the interference component number matching result generated in step S171 to update the setting file F1. In some implementations, the inspection program 111 can obtain the corresponding setting conditions from a pre-set definition file, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

[0035] In some embodiments, after executing step S160 , the electronic device 200 may return to execute step S110 to utilize the CAM software 120 to perform the drop analysis on the test object again according to the updated setting file F1 , and repeat the calculation in this way.

[0036] In some embodiments, when the analysis result in step S150 is that any interference result does not exceed the preset threshold, the checking program 111 may not update the setting file F1 of the CAM software 120 to terminate the loop (step S180 ).

[0037] Figure 5 FIG. 1 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a mechanical data inspection method. Figure 1 and Figure 5 , the following will continue to explain how the electronic device 200 executes the mechanical data inspection method based on the computer-aided engineering software 120.

[0038] In one embodiment of the mechanical data inspection method, the electronic device 200 can use the inspection program 111 of the inspection software 110 to read the parameter standard file F3 (step S210), and use the inspection program 111 to extract multiple mechanical data results of multiple detection components of the test object from the fall analysis file F2 of the computer-aided engineering software 120 (step S220). The order of step S210 and step S220 can be interchanged or executed simultaneously, and the present invention is not limited to this.

[0039] In some embodiments, before executing step S210 and step S220, the electronic device 200 may first enable the computer-aided engineering software 120, and use the computer-aided engineering software 120 to perform a drop analysis on the test object according to the setting file F1 to simulate the damage suffered by the test object when it is impacted after falling. After completing the drop analysis, the computer-aided engineering software 120 generates a drop analysis file F2 according to the simulation test results (step S230). In addition, the electronic device 200 can also monitor whether the drop analysis of the computer-aided engineering software 120 has been completed by the detection program 112 of the inspection software 110 (step S240), and only after the detection program 112 detects that the drop analysis of the computer-aided engineering software 120 has been completed, the detection program 112 causes the inspection program 111 to execute steps S210 and S220. In one embodiment of step S230, each detection component of the test object can also be gridded to include multiple elements, and the computer-aided engineering software 120 can generate mechanical data results of each element in the fall analysis file F2. In other words, each detection component can correspond to multiple mechanical data results. Since the detailed implementation of step S230 can refer to the previous step S110, and the detailed implementation of step S240 can refer to the previous step S130, it will not be repeated here.

[0040] In some embodiments, the parameter standard file F3 in step S210 may include parameter standards of various materials, such as rupture standards and / or yield standards. Furthermore, the mechanical data results in step S220 may include stress data and / or strain data. In some implementations, the values ​​of multiple parameter standards in the parameter standard file F3 may be defined by the user according to the material table. In addition, the parameter standard file F3 may be an Excel file, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

[0041] In one embodiment of step S220, the checking program 111 extracts the mechanical data results of all elements of each detection component at a specified time from the fall analysis file F2. The specified time may be a single time point or include multiple continuous time points. When the specified time is a single time point, each element of each detection component may include a mechanical data result at a single time point. When the specified time is multiple continuous time points, each element of each detection component may include multiple mechanical data results at multiple time points.

[0042] After obtaining multiple mechanical data results of multiple detection components in step S220, the inspection program 111 can compare the multiple mechanical data results of each detection component with multiple parameter standards in the parameter standard file F3 to screen out at least one component that exceeds the standard (step S250).

[0043] Figure 6 for Figure 5 A flowchart of an embodiment of step S250 in FIG. Figure 1 , Figure 5 and Figure 6 In one embodiment of step S250, the inspection program 111 may compare the mechanical data results of each element of each detection component at a specified time with the parameter standard corresponding to the element to confirm whether the mechanical data results of each element at a specified time exceed the parameter standard (step S251), and thereby filter out the elements exceeding the parameter standard. Next, the inspection program 111 may calculate the number of elements exceeding the parameter standard based on the specified time (step S252). Thereafter, the inspection program 111 may filter out at least one exceeding component having at least a first number of elements exceeding the parameter standard at the specified time according to the calculation result of step S252 (step S253). For example, assuming that the inspection program 111 finds that the detection components A and the detection components B in the test object have elements exceeding the first number, such as 100, of the parameter standard at 2 milliseconds, and the detection component C has elements exceeding the first number of the parameter standard at 3 milliseconds, the inspection program 111 may filter out the detection components A, B, and C as the at least one exceeding component. It should be noted that the aforementioned first number of values ​​is not limited thereto, and the value can be set by the user.

[0044] After selecting at least one component exceeding the standard in step S250, the inspection program 111 can generate a mechanical data analysis report based on multiple mechanical data results of at least one component exceeding the standard (step S260). In some implementations, the mechanical data report can be an Excel file, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

[0045] In summary, the element penetration inspection method and mechanical data inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software of the embodiment of the present invention can quickly confirm the element penetration situation and the mechanical data exceeding the standard situation with the assistance of the inspection software. In particular, the element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software of the embodiment of the present invention automatically feeds multiple offset coordinates in the fall analysis file into the computer-aided engineering software to automatically perform element penetration inspection, reduce manpower and avoid human negligence, and can automatically update the setting file based on the inspection results and then re-cycle the calculation. In addition, the mechanical data inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software of the embodiment of the present invention can automatically extract multiple mechanical data results in the fall analysis file to perform damage confirmation of the detection component, reduce manpower and avoid human negligence, and thus improve work efficiency.

[0046] Although the technical contents of the present invention have been disclosed as above in the preferred embodiments, they are not used to limit the present invention. Any slight changes and modifications made by anyone skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention should be included in the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be determined by the scope of the attached patent application.

Claims

1. An element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software, characterized in that: Include: Using a computer-aided engineering software to perform a drop analysis on a test object according to a setting file and generate a drop analysis file; Extracting multiple offset coordinates in the fall analysis file; Feeding the offset coordinates into the computer-aided engineering software for an interference check; Analyzing whether a plurality of interference results of the interference check exceed a preset threshold, wherein the test object includes a plurality of components, and each of the interference results is an element interference depth between any two of the components; and updating the configuration file of the computer-aided engineering software according to each of the interference results exceeding the preset threshold; The test object includes a plurality of components, and the step of extracting the offset coordinates in the fall analysis file includes: Obtaining node information of each component at a specified time from the fall analysis file, wherein the node information at the specified time includes three-axis coordinates of all nodes of each component, and all nodes of each component refer to endpoints of all elements meshed on each component; and Generate a node code at the specified time according to the node information at the specified time; wherein the specified time includes a plurality of consecutive time points; The step of feeding the offset coordinates into the computer-aided engineering software for the interference check comprises: The node code at the designated time is loaded by the computer-aided engineering software to perform the interference check at the designated time.

2. The element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software according to claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: A detection program is used to monitor whether the fall analysis of the computer-aided engineering software is completed, wherein the step of extracting the offset coordinates in the fall analysis file is performed when the detection program detects that the fall analysis is completed.

3. The element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software according to claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: An interference result report is generated according to the interference results of the interference check.

4. The element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that: The step of generating the interference result report according to the interference results of the interference check comprises: Generate an interference component number matching result according to each interference result exceeding the preset threshold; The interference result report is generated according to the interference component number matching result.

5. The element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software according to claim 4, characterized in that: The step of updating the configuration file of the computer-aided engineering software according to each interference result exceeding the preset threshold comprises: According to the interference component number matching result, the corresponding setting condition is added to the setting file to update the setting file.

6. The element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software according to claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: After the setting file is updated, the step of returning to the step of using the computer-aided engineering software to perform the drop analysis on the test object according to the setting file and generating the drop analysis file is performed.

7. The element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software according to claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: When any of the interference results does not exceed the preset threshold, the setting file of the computer-aided engineering software is not updated.

8. The element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software according to claim 1, characterized in that: Include: Read a parameter standard file; Extracting a plurality of mechanical data results of a plurality of test components from a drop analysis file of a computer-aided engineering software; Respectively comparing the mechanical data results of each of the detected components with a plurality of parameter standards in the parameter standard file to screen out at least one component that exceeds the standard; as well as Generate a mechanical data analysis report according to the mechanical data results of the at least one component exceeding the standard; Wherein, each of the detection components comprises a plurality of elements, and the step of extracting the mechanical data results of the detection components from the fall analysis file of the computer-aided engineering software comprises: Extracting the mechanical data results of the elements of each of the detection components at a specified time; Each of the elements corresponds to one of the parameter standards, and the steps of comparing the mechanical data results of each of the detection components with the parameter standards in the parameter standard file to screen out the at least one component exceeding the standard include: Comparing whether the mechanical data results of each element at the specified time exceed the corresponding parameter standard; Calculating the number of the element exceeding the parameter standard based on the specified time; and The at least one out-of-specification component having at least a first number of the elements exceeding the parameter standard at the specified time is screened.

9. The element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software according to claim 8, characterized in that: Each of the mechanical data results includes stress data, strain data or a combination thereof.

10. The element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software according to claim 8, characterized in that: Also includes: The computer-aided engineering software is used to perform a drop analysis on a test object and generate the drop analysis file, wherein the test object includes the detection components.

11. The element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software according to claim 10, characterized in that: Also includes: Using a detection program to monitor whether the fall analysis of the computer-aided engineering software is completed; The step of extracting the mechanical data results of the detection components from the fall analysis file of the computer-aided engineering software is performed when the detection program detects that the fall analysis is completed.

12. The element penetration inspection method based on computer-aided engineering software according to claim 8, characterized in that: The specified time includes multiple consecutive time points.

Images