Seismic analysis method, device and related equipment based on empirical data

Abstract

The present application discloses a method, device and related equipment for earthquake resistance analysis based on empirical data. The method includes: determining the dimension information of the empirical database according to a pre-established empirical database; determining the analysis result of the attribute information on earthquake resistance performance according to the attribute information of the target device; determining the difference between the target device and the reference device according to the dimension information and the analysis result; and determining that the earthquake resistance performance of the target device is qualified when the difference is within a preset range. The method can be based on relevant standards of the earthquake resistance industry and on empirical data to perform a multi-dimensional analysis of the earthquake resistance performance of the equipment, so that the reliability of the analysis equipment is higher, and the construction period is shortened while ensuring the quality, thereby improving the efficiency of the identification equipment and reducing the manpower, time and economic costs.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of computer technology, and in particular to a method, device, electronic device and computer-readable storage medium for earthquake-resistant analysis based on empirical data. Background Art

[0002] In the related technology, the seismic performance verification of the instrumentation and control cabinet structure of a nuclear power plant is to process the actual cabinet structure, integrate it according to the requirements of the heaviest layout of the cabinet weight, and then verify whether its seismic performance meets the requirements through seismic tests. However, the cycle of this method of verifying seismic performance from cabinet processing, integrated assembly to seismic test execution is as long as more than 9 months, that is, the cycle is long, very time-consuming, and consumes a lot of manpower and economic costs. Therefore, how to better realize the verification of seismic performance has become an urgent problem to be solved. Summary of the invention

[0003] The object of the present invention is to solve one of the technical problems in the related art at least to a certain extent.

[0004] To this end, the first purpose of the present invention is to propose a seismic analysis method based on empirical data. The method can analyze the seismic performance of equipment in multiple dimensions based on relevant standards of the seismic industry and empirical data, so that the reliability of the analysis equipment is high, and the construction period is shortened while ensuring the quality, the efficiency of the identification equipment is improved, and the manpower, time and economic costs are reduced.

[0005] The second objective of the present application is to propose a seismic analysis device based on empirical data.

[0006] The third objective of the present application is to provide an electronic device.

[0007] A fourth objective of the present application is to provide a computer-readable storage medium.

[0008] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the first aspect of the present application proposes a seismic analysis method based on empirical data, the method comprising: determining the dimensional information of the empirical database based on a pre-established empirical database; determining the analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance based on the attribute information of the target device; determining the difference between the target device and the reference device based on the dimensional information and the analysis result; and when it is judged that the difference is within a preset range, determining that the seismic performance of the target device is qualified.

[0009] According to the seismic analysis method based on empirical data in the embodiment of the present application, the dimension information of the empirical database can be determined based on the pre-established empirical database, and then the analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance can be determined based on the attribute information of the target device, and then the difference between the target device and the reference device can be determined based on the dimension information and the analysis result. When the difference is within the preset range, the seismic performance of the target device is determined to be qualified. This method can be based on relevant standards of the seismic industry and based on empirical data to perform a multi-dimensional analysis of the seismic performance of the equipment, so that the reliability of the analysis equipment is higher, and the construction period is shortened while ensuring quality, the efficiency of the identification equipment is improved, and the manpower, time and economic costs are reduced.

[0010] According to one embodiment of the present application, the dimensional information includes: motion characteristics, shock resistance, and reference device characteristics.

[0011] According to one embodiment of the present application, the attribute information includes dimensions, and the dimensions include depth, height, and width, wherein the analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance is determined based on the attribute information of the target device, including: determining the overturning risk and collapse risk of the target device based on the depth of the target device; determining the overturning risk of the target device based on the height of the target device.

[0012] According to an embodiment of the present application, an impact evaluation principle of the target device is determined according to changes in the depth, height, and width of the target device.

[0013] According to an embodiment of the present application, determining the difference between the target device and a reference device based on the analysis result includes: comparing the analysis result of the target device with the seismic performance of the reference device to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

[0014] According to one embodiment of the present application, the dimensional information is motion characteristics, wherein determining the difference between the target device and the reference device based on the dimensional information includes: comparing the motion characteristics of the target device and the reference device based on test experience to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

[0015] According to one embodiment of the present application, the dimensional information is seismic resistance, wherein determining the difference between the target device and the reference device based on the dimensional information includes: comparing the seismic resistance of the target device and the reference device based on test experience to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

[0016] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the second aspect of the present application proposes a seismic analysis device based on empirical data, and the device includes: a first determination module, which is used to determine the dimensional information of the empirical database based on a pre-established empirical database; a second determination module, which is used to determine the analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance based on the attribute information of the target device; a third determination module, which is used to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device based on the dimensional information and the analysis result; and a fourth determination module, which is used to determine that the seismic performance of the target device is qualified when the difference is within a preset range.

[0017] According to the seismic analysis device based on empirical data in the embodiment of the present application, the dimension information of the empirical database can be determined based on the pre-established empirical database, and then the analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance can be determined based on the attribute information of the target device, and then the difference between the target device and the reference device can be determined based on the dimension information and the analysis result. When the difference is within the preset range, the seismic performance of the target device is determined to be qualified. In this way, the seismic performance of the equipment can be analyzed in multiple dimensions according to the relevant standards of the seismic industry and based on empirical data, so that the reliability of the analysis equipment is higher, and the construction period is shortened while ensuring the quality, the efficiency of the identification equipment is improved, and the manpower, time and economic costs are reduced.

[0018] To achieve the above-mentioned objectives, the third aspect embodiment of the present application proposes an electronic device, comprising: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the processor executes the computer program, the seismic analysis method based on empirical data described in the first aspect embodiment of the present application is implemented.

[0019] To achieve the above-mentioned objectives, the fourth aspect of the present application proposes a computer-readable storage medium, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the seismic analysis method based on empirical data described in the first aspect of the present application is implemented.

[0020] Additional aspects and advantages of the present application will be given in part in the description below, and in part will become apparent from the description below, or will be learned through the practice of the present application. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0021] The above and / or additional aspects and advantages of the present application will become apparent and easily understood from the description of the embodiments in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:

[0022] Figure 1 is a flow chart of a seismic analysis method based on empirical data according to an embodiment of the present application;

[0023] Figure 2 is a flow chart of a seismic analysis method based on empirical data according to a specific embodiment of the present application;

[0024] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the overturning force of a cabinet according to an embodiment of the present application;

[0025] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of a cabinet collapse according to an embodiment of the present application;

[0026] Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the overturning force of a cabinet according to an embodiment of the present application;

[0027] Figure 6 It is a schematic diagram of the envelope diagram of the seismic test spectrum versus the required response spectrum according to an embodiment of the present application, in the X direction;

[0028] Figure 7 It is a schematic diagram of the Y direction of the envelope diagram of the seismic test spectrum versus the required response spectrum according to one embodiment of the present application;

[0029] Figure 8 It is a schematic diagram of the Z direction of the envelope diagram of the seismic test spectrum versus the required response spectrum according to one embodiment of the present application;

[0030] Fig. 9 is a structural schematic diagram of a seismic analysis device based on empirical data according to another embodiment of the present application;

[0031] Fig.10 It is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0032] Embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below, examples of which are shown in the accompanying drawings, wherein the same or similar reference numerals throughout represent the same or similar elements or elements having the same or similar functions. The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are exemplary and are intended to be used to explain the present invention, and should not be construed as limiting the present invention.

[0033] In the related technology, the seismic performance verification of the instrumentation and control cabinet structure of a nuclear power plant is to process the actual cabinet structure, integrate it according to the requirements of the heaviest layout of the cabinet weight, and then verify whether its seismic performance meets the requirements through seismic tests. However, the cycle of this method of verifying seismic performance from cabinet processing, integrated assembly to seismic test execution is as long as more than 9 months, that is, the cycle is long, very time-consuming, and consumes a lot of manpower and economic costs. Therefore, how to better realize the verification of seismic performance has become an urgent problem to be solved.

[0034] To this end, the present application proposes a seismic analysis method, device, electronic device and computer-readable storage medium based on empirical data.

[0035] Figure 1It is a flow chart of a seismic analysis method based on empirical data according to an embodiment of the present application. It should be noted that the seismic analysis method based on empirical data in the embodiment of the present application can be applied to the seismic analysis device based on empirical data in the embodiment of the present application, and the device can be configured on an electronic device. Among them, in the embodiment of the present invention, the electronic device can be a PC or a mobile terminal (such as a mobile phone, a tablet computer, a PAD, a personal digital assistant, and other hardware devices with various operating systems).

[0036] like Figure 1 As shown in Figure 2, the seismic analysis method based on empirical data includes:

[0037] S110, determining dimension information of the experience database according to a pre-established experience database.

[0038] Among them, the experience database can be understood as an earthquake-resistant experience database.

[0039] In the embodiment of the present application, the completed cabinet seismic test results are used as seismic experience data to establish a seismic experience database, wherein the equipment that has passed the seismic test can be used as a reference equipment.

[0040] Among them, the dimensional information of the experience database includes: motion characteristics, seismic resistance, and reference equipment characteristics.

[0041] For example, the motion characteristics mainly include: whether the input motion is multi-frequency, whether the input motion includes front-to-back, left-to-right, and vertical test response spectra, whether the test input motion is at the equipment installation position, whether the test input motion has a wide-band response spectrum with an octave or larger amplification area, whether the direction of the test input motion is bidirectional or tridirectional, etc.

[0042] Among them, seismic resistance can be understood as the response spectrum required by the seismic test.

[0043] The characteristics of the reference equipment group mainly include: equipment model, manufacturer, weight, main structure design details, shape, size, load path including brackets, identification standards, materials, installation methods and other influencing factors.

[0044] S120, determining, according to the attribute information of the target device, an analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance.

[0045] In the embodiment of the present application, based on the similarity principle, the target device can be determined according to the reference device, and then the analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance can be determined according to the attribute information of the target device.

[0046] The attribute information includes size, which includes depth, height, and width.

[0047] That is, the analysis result of the anti-seismic performance can be realized according to the depth, height and width of the target device. The specific implementation process can refer to the subsequent embodiments.

[0048] S130, determining the difference between the target device and the reference device according to the dimension information and the analysis result.

[0049] In the embodiment of the present application, after determining the dimension information and the analysis results, the motion characteristics, earthquake resistance, and main factors of earthquake resistance of the target device and the reference device can be compared, and then the difference between the target device and the reference device can be determined. The specific implementation process can refer to the subsequent embodiments.

[0050] S140, when it is determined that the difference is within a preset range, the target device is determined to be a device with qualified anti-seismic performance.

[0051] According to the seismic analysis method based on empirical data in the embodiment of the present application, the dimension information of the empirical database can be determined based on the pre-established empirical database, and then the analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance can be determined based on the attribute information of the target device, and then the difference between the target device and the reference device can be determined based on the dimension information and the analysis result. When the difference is within the preset range, the seismic performance of the target device is determined to be qualified. This method can be based on relevant standards of the seismic industry and based on empirical data to perform a multi-dimensional analysis of the seismic performance of the equipment, so that the reliability of the analysis equipment is higher, and the construction period is shortened while ensuring quality, the efficiency of the identification equipment is improved, and the manpower, time and economic costs are reduced.

[0052] In order to make it easier for those skilled in the art to understand this application, Figure 2 is a flow chart of a seismic analysis method based on empirical data provided according to a specific embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2 As shown, the earthquake-resistant analysis method based on empirical data may include:

[0053] 210, determining dimension information of the experience database according to the pre-established experience database.

[0054] Among them, the dimensional information of the experience database includes: motion characteristics and earthquake resistance.

[0055] For example, the motion characteristics mainly include: whether the input motion is multi-frequency, whether the input motion includes front-to-back, left-to-right, and vertical test response spectra, whether the test input motion is at the equipment installation position, whether the test input motion has a wide-band response spectrum with an octave or larger amplification area, whether the direction of the test input motion is bidirectional or tridirectional, etc.

[0056] Among them, seismic resistance can be understood as the response spectrum required by the seismic test.

[0057] S220, determining a target device.

[0058] In an embodiment of the present application, the target device can be determined based on the reference device based on the device similarity evaluation principle, wherein analysis principles are given for the main influencing factors affecting the device similarity, such as device model, manufacturer, weight, main structure design details, shape, size, load path including bracket, identification standard, material, installation method, etc.

[0059] For example, the specific implementation process can be referred to as shown in Table 1.

[0060]

[0061]

[0062] Table 1

[0063] S230: Determine, according to the attribute information of the target device, an analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance.

[0064] The attribute information includes the size, which includes depth, height, and width.

[0065] Among them, by counting the main differences between different products of nuclear power plant instrumentation and control cabinets, it is identified that the main difference is size, and a more specific evaluation principle for size difference needs to be determined, that is, to quantify the acceptable range of the impact of size changes on the seismic performance of the cabinet.

[0066] In the embodiments of the present application, the target device can be understood as a cabinet structure, wherein the seismic performance of the cabinet structure refers to the ability of the cabinet structure to maintain structural integrity under seismic conditions, specifically refers to the cabinet not overturning or collapsing under seismic conditions. Under the same conditions of the main factors affecting the seismic test results, namely the installation method, structural form, cabinet material, seismic load, etc., the cabinet dimensions have different effects on the two failures of overturning and collapse. The cabinet dimensions include cabinet depth H, cabinet width W, and cabinet height L, wherein the effect of cabinet depth H on seismic performance is applicable to cabinet width W. Therefore, the cabinet depth H and cabinet height L are taken as examples to demonstrate the effect of size differences on seismic performance.

[0067] For example, in an embodiment of the present application, the specific implementation method of analyzing the influence of cabinet depth on overturning is as follows: Figure 3 As shown, the overturning force analysis of the cabinet is performed in the depth direction of the cabinet. Assuming that the overturning moment of the cabinet along the depth direction of the cabinet under the seismic load is M, the cabinet depth is H, and the support reaction force of the cabinet welding part is F, then the following relationship exists: M=F*H, where it can be seen from the formula that the support reaction force F of the cabinet welding part is in a linear inverse proportional relationship with the cabinet depth H.

[0068] For example, in the embodiment of the present application, the specific implementation method of analyzing the influence of cabinet depth on collapse is as follows: Figure 4 As shown, the cabinet collapse analysis is performed in the cabinet depth direction, and the bending moment of the cabinet beam is positively correlated with the cabinet collapse, that is, the greater the bending moment of the cabinet beam, the greater the risk of cabinet collapse. Assuming that the bending moment of the cabinet along the cabinet depth direction under the seismic load is M, the cabinet depth is H, and the cabinet beam load distribution under the seismic load is a uniform load q, then there is the following relationship: M = (q*H^2) / 8, where it can be seen from the formula that the bending moment M of the cabinet along the cabinet depth direction under the seismic load is proportional to the square of the cabinet depth H, that is, the greater the depth of the cabinet, the greater the bending moment M of the cabinet along the cabinet depth direction under the seismic load, and the greater the risk of cabinet collapse.

[0069] For example, the specific implementation method of analyzing the impact of cabinet height on overturning is as follows: Figure 5 As shown, the overturning force analysis of the cabinet is performed in the height direction of the cabinet. Assuming that the overturning moment of the cabinet along the depth direction of the cabinet under the seismic load is M, the cabinet height is L, and the inertia force of the cabinet under the seismic load is Q, then the following relationship exists: M=Q*L / 2, where it can be seen from the formula that the overturning moment M of the cabinet along the depth direction of the cabinet under the seismic load is proportional to the cabinet height L.

[0070] Based on the analysis of the impact of cabinet depth on overturning, the impact of cabinet depth on collapse, and the impact of cabinet height on overturning, it can be seen that the main considerations for determining the evaluation principles of the impact of cabinet size changes on seismic performance are: there is a 10% margin in the severity level of the cabinet seismic identification test; GB50267 and GJB150.18A have relevant requirements on equipment similarity, and when the overall natural frequency of the equipment changes by no more than 10%, the equipment remains similar. Therefore, it is determined that the impact of cabinet size changes on seismic performance should not be greater than 10%. The specific evaluation principles are shown in Table 2:

[0071]

[0072]

[0073] Table 2

[0074] It should be noted that the increase in the depth and width of the cabinet shall not be greater than 5%, and the decrease shall not be greater than 10%; the increase in the height of the cabinet shall not be greater than 10%; the cabinet dimensions shall not differ at the same time, that is, there shall be differences in only one direction.

[0075] S240: When the dimensional information is a motion characteristic, a difference between the target device and the reference device is determined according to the dimensional information.

[0076] In the embodiment of the present application, the motion characteristics of the target device and the reference device are compared based on the test experience to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

[0077] For example, comparing the empirical motion characteristics of the target device and the reference device in the test mainly includes: whether the test input motion is multi-frequency or single-frequency, whether the test input motion includes front and back, left and right, and vertical directions, whether the test input motion is simultaneous in three directions, whether the test input motion is at the device installation position, and other information.

[0078] For example, a server cabinet A of a nuclear power plant is selected as the reference equipment, and the specific test input characteristics are as follows:

[0079] The test input motion is multi-frequency, and the artificial acceleration time history curve is generated by the National Construction Engineering Quality Supervision and Inspection Center according to the required response spectrum of the nuclear power plant, in accordance with the requirements of HAF J0053-1995 "Guidelines for Seismic Qualification Test of Nuclear Equipment", and the requirements of Clause 8.6 of GB / T13625-2018 "Seismic Qualification of Safety-Grade Electrical Equipment of Nuclear Power Plants";

[0080] The experimental input motion included front-to-back, left-to-right, and vertical experimental response spectra;

[0081] The test input motion is at the equipment installation location. The seismic test response spectrum is generated based on the added sensors arranged on the seismic station, which represents the input motion of the server cabinet A of the nuclear power plant and the installation location of the seismic station;

[0082] The test input motion has a broadband response spectrum with a frequency band greater than one octave;

[0083] The test input movement is carried out in three directions simultaneously.

[0084] It should be noted that by comparing the empirical motion characteristics of the target device and the reference device through the test input features, there is no difference between the reference device and the target device. The input features are generated according to the requirements of HAFJ0053 and are the same for the reference device and the target device.

[0085] S250, when the dimensional information is seismic resistance, determining a difference between the target device and the reference device according to the dimensional signal.

[0086] For example, comparing the seismic capacity of new equipment with that of reference equipment. This mainly includes: whether the required response spectrum (RRS) of the new equipment is enveloped by the test experience spectrum (TES) of the reference equipment group within the studied frequency range (typically 1Hz to the cut-off frequency), whether the required response spectrum (RRS) damping ratio is the same, etc.

[0087] For example, server cabinet A of a nuclear power plant is used as reference equipment, and the test experience spectrum meets the requirements of Appendix G2.3 of GB / T 13625-2018 "Seismic Qualification of Safety-Grade Electrical Equipment in Nuclear Power Plants".

[0088] Among them, the test requirement of server cabinet A of a nuclear power plant as a reference equipment is that the response spectrum envelopes the floor response spectrum of a nuclear power plant. The specific parameters are shown in the table below:

[0089] For example, Table 3 is a table of horizontal response spectrum values ​​required for a test of server cabinet A in a nuclear power plant:

[0090] Frequency(HZ) OBE 5% acceleration (G) SSE 5% acceleration (G) 1 0.2 0.116 0.230 2 1 0.521 1.0416 3 3 2.683 5.365 4 10 2.683 5.365 5 33 0.55 1.1 6 100 0.55 1.1

[0091] Table 3 For example, Table 4 is a table of vertical response spectrum values ​​required for a test of server cabinet A in a nuclear power plant:

[0092] Frequency(HZ) OBE 5% acceleration (G) SSE 5% acceleration (G) 1 0.2 0.102 0.203 2 3 1.448 2.885 3 14 1.448 2.885 4 35 0.419 0.836 5 100 0.419 0.836

[0093] Table 4

[0094] In the embodiment of the present application, an artificial acceleration time history curve generated by a seismic test laboratory according to the service requirement response spectrum of a nuclear power plant and in accordance with the requirements of HAF·J0053-1995 "Guidelines for Seismic Qualification Tests of Nuclear Equipment" is shown in the figure. For example, Figure 6 This is the envelope diagram of the seismic test spectrum of server cabinet A in a nuclear power plant against the required response spectrum, X direction; Figure 7 This is the envelope diagram of the seismic test spectrum of server cabinet A in a nuclear power plant against the required response spectrum, Y direction; Figure 8 This is the Z-direction envelope diagram of the seismic test spectrum of server cabinet A in a nuclear power plant versus the required response spectrum.

[0095] S260, determining the difference between the target device and the reference device according to the analysis result.

[0096] In the embodiment of the present application, the analysis result of the target device is compared with the anti-seismic performance of the reference device to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

[0097] For example, the main factors affecting seismic performance include whether the equipment model, manufacturer, weight, main structure design details, shape, size, load path including brackets, identification standards, materials, and installation methods are within the scope of the evaluation principles. A server cabinet A of a nuclear power plant is used as a reference equipment. Its important seismic performance includes the requirement that the cabinet must not overturn or collapse under SSE conditions. The differences in its main influencing factors are shown in Table 5:

[0098]

[0099]

[0100] Table 5

[0101] It should be noted that the main structural form of the target device (cabinet to be identified) and the reference device (server cabinet A) is compared as follows: The difference between the target device and the reference device is the difference in the main structural size, which is manifested in the main frame structure width and height are the same, but there is a difference in depth. The depth dimension of the target device is 946mm, and the depth dimension of the reference device is 1000mm, with a difference of 54mm, and the difference rate is 5.4%, which is less than 10%. It can be determined that the depth difference is within the allowable range.

[0102] S270: When it is determined that the difference is within a preset range, it is determined that the seismic performance of the target device is qualified.

[0103] That is to say, based on the above analysis, by taking the server cabinet A of the nuclear power plant as the reference empirical data and comparing it with the key characteristic parameters of the reference cabinet, the difference in the main structure size is identified, and through theoretical analysis, it is concluded that the seismic performance of the cabinet to be identified is qualified, that is, the seismic performance of the target equipment is qualified.

[0104] According to the seismic analysis method based on empirical data in the embodiment of the present application, the dimension information of the empirical database is determined according to the pre-established empirical database, and then the target device is determined, and the analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance is determined according to the attribute information of the target device. When the dimension information is the motion characteristics, the difference between the target device and the reference device is determined according to the motion characteristics. When the dimension information is the seismic capacity, the difference between the target device and the reference device is determined according to the seismic capacity. According to the analysis result, the difference between the target device and the reference device is determined. When the difference is within the preset range, it is determined that the seismic performance of the target device is qualified. This method can be based on the relevant standards of the seismic industry and based on empirical data, and the seismic performance of the equipment is analyzed in multiple dimensions, so that the reliability of the analysis equipment is high, and the construction period is shortened while ensuring the quality, the efficiency of the identification equipment is improved, and the manpower, time and economic costs are reduced.

[0105] Corresponding to the seismic analysis methods based on empirical data provided in the above-mentioned embodiments, an embodiment of the present application also provides a seismic analysis device based on empirical data. Since the seismic analysis device based on empirical data provided in the embodiment of the present application corresponds to the seismic analysis methods based on empirical data provided in the above-mentioned embodiments, the implementation method of the seismic analysis method based on empirical data is also applicable to the seismic analysis device based on empirical data provided in this embodiment, and will not be described in detail in this embodiment. Fig. 9 It is a structural schematic diagram of a seismic analysis device based on empirical data according to an embodiment of the present application.

[0106] like Fig. 9 As shown, the earthquake-resistant analysis device 900 based on empirical data may include: a first determination module 910 , a second determination module 920 , a third determination module 930 and a fourth determination module 940 .

[0107] Specifically, the first determination module 910 is used to determine the dimension information of the experience database according to the pre-established experience database;

[0108] A second determination module 920 is used to determine, based on the attribute information of the target device, an analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance;

[0109] A third determination module 930, configured to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device according to the dimension information and the analysis result;

[0110] The fourth determination module 940 is used to determine that the seismic performance of the target device is qualified when the difference is within a preset range.

[0111] According to the seismic analysis device based on empirical data in the embodiment of the present application, the dimension information of the empirical database can be determined based on the pre-established empirical database, and then the analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance can be determined based on the attribute information of the target device, and then the difference between the target device and the reference device can be determined based on the dimension information and the analysis result. When the difference is within the preset range, the seismic performance of the target device is determined to be qualified. In this way, the seismic performance of the equipment can be analyzed in multiple dimensions according to the relevant standards of the seismic industry and based on empirical data, so that the reliability of the analysis equipment is higher, and the construction period is shortened while ensuring the quality, the efficiency of the identification equipment is improved, and the manpower, time and economic costs are reduced.

[0112] In one embodiment of the present application, the dimensional information includes: motion characteristics, shock resistance, and reference device characteristics.

[0113] In one embodiment of the present application, the attribute information includes size, and the size includes depth, height, and width, wherein the second determination module is specifically used to: determine the overturning risk and collapse risk of the target device according to the depth of the target device; determine the overturning risk of the target device according to the height of the target device.

[0114] In one embodiment of the present application, the second determination module is specifically used to determine the impact evaluation principle of the target device according to changes in the depth, height, and width of the target device.

[0115] In one embodiment of the present application, the third determination module is specifically used to: compare the analysis result of the target device with the anti-seismic performance of the reference device to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

[0116] In one embodiment of the present application, the dimensional information is motion characteristics, wherein the third determination module is specifically used to: compare the motion characteristics of the target device with those of the reference device in test experience to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

[0117] In one embodiment of the present application, the dimensional information is earthquake resistance, wherein the third determination module is specifically used to: compare the earthquake resistance of the target device with that of the reference device based on test experience, and determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

[0118] According to the device of the embodiment of the present application, the following reference is made to Fig.10 , which shows a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device (such as a terminal device or a server) 1000 suitable for implementing the embodiment of the present application. The terminal device in the embodiment of the present application may include but is not limited to mobile terminals such as mobile phones, notebook computers, digital broadcast receivers, PDAs (personal digital assistants), PADs (tablet computers), PMPs (portable multimedia players), vehicle-mounted terminals (such as vehicle-mounted navigation terminals), etc., and fixed terminals such as digital TVs, desktop computers, etc. Fig.10 The electronic device shown is merely an example and should not bring any limitation to the functions and scope of use of the embodiments of the present application.

[0119] like Fig.10 As shown, the electronic device 1000 may include a processing device (e.g., a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit, etc.) 1001, which can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to a program stored in a read-only memory (ROM) 1002 or a program loaded from a storage device 1005 into a random access memory (RAM) 1003. In the RAM 1003, various programs and data required for the operation of the electronic device 1000 are also stored. The processing device 1001, the ROM 1002, and the RAM 1003 are connected to each other via a bus 1004. An input / output (I / O) interface 1005 is also connected to the bus 1004.

[0120] Typically, the following devices may be connected to the I / O interface 1005: an input device 1006 including, for example, a touch screen, a touch pad, a keyboard, a mouse, a camera, a microphone, an accelerometer, a gyroscope, etc.; an output device 1007 including, for example, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a speaker, a vibrator, etc.; a storage device 1005 including, for example, a magnetic tape, a hard disk, etc.; and a communication device 1009. The communication device 1009 may allow the electronic device 1000 to communicate with other devices wirelessly or by wire to exchange data. Although Fig.10 The electronic device 1000 is shown with various devices, but it should be understood that it is not required to implement or possess all the devices shown. More or fewer devices may be implemented or possessed instead.

[0121] In particular, according to an embodiment of the present application, the process described above with reference to the flowchart can be implemented as a computer software program. For example, an embodiment of the present application includes a computer program product, which includes a computer program carried on a non-transitory computer-readable medium, and the computer program includes a program code for executing the method shown in the flowchart. In such an embodiment, the computer program can be downloaded and installed from the network through the communication device 1009, or installed from the storage device 1008, or installed from the ROM 1002. When the computer program is executed by the processing device 1001, the above-mentioned functions defined in the method of the embodiment of the present application are executed.

[0122] It should be noted that the computer-readable medium mentioned above in the present application may be a computer-readable signal medium or a computer-readable storage medium or any combination of the above two. The computer-readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, device or device, or any combination of the above. More specific examples of computer-readable storage media may include, but are not limited to: an electrical connection with one or more wires, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the above. In the present application, a computer-readable storage medium may be any tangible medium containing or storing a program that can be used by or in combination with an instruction execution system, device or device. In the present application, a computer-readable signal medium may include a data signal propagated in a baseband or as part of a carrier wave, which carries a computer-readable program code. This propagated data signal may take a variety of forms, including but not limited to electromagnetic signals, optical signals, or any suitable combination of the above. The computer readable signal medium may also be any computer readable medium other than a computer readable storage medium, which may send, propagate or transmit a program for use by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus or device. The program code contained on the computer readable medium may be transmitted using any suitable medium, including but not limited to: wires, optical cables, RF (radio frequency), etc., or any suitable combination of the above.

[0123] In some embodiments, the client and the server may communicate using any currently known or future developed network protocol such as HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol), and may be interconnected with any form or medium of digital data communication (e.g., a communication network). Examples of communication networks include a local area network ("LAN"), a wide area network ("WAN"), an internet (e.g., the Internet), and a peer-to-peer network (e.g., an ad hoc peer-to-peer network), as well as any currently known or future developed network.

[0124] The computer-readable medium may be included in the electronic device, or may exist independently without being incorporated into the electronic device.

[0125] The computer-readable medium carries one or more programs. When the one or more programs are executed by the electronic device, the electronic device: obtains at least two Internet Protocol addresses; sends a node evaluation request including the at least two Internet Protocol addresses to a node evaluation device, wherein the node evaluation device selects an Internet Protocol address from the at least two Internet Protocol addresses and returns it; receives the Internet Protocol address returned by the node evaluation device; wherein the obtained Internet Protocol address indicates an edge node in a content distribution network.

[0126] Alternatively, the computer-readable medium carries one or more programs, and when the one or more programs are executed by the electronic device, the electronic device: receives a node evaluation request including at least two Internet Protocol addresses; selects an Internet Protocol address from the at least two Internet Protocol addresses; and returns the selected Internet Protocol address; wherein the received Internet Protocol address indicates an edge node in a content distribution network.

[0127] Computer program code for performing the operations of the present application may be written in one or more programming languages ​​or a combination thereof, including, but not limited to, object-oriented programming languages, such as Java, Smalltalk, C++, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as "C" or similar programming languages. The program code may be executed entirely on the user's computer, partially on the user's computer, as a separate software package, partially on the user's computer and partially on a remote computer, or entirely on a remote computer or server. In cases involving a remote computer, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer via any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or may be connected to an external computer (e.g., via the Internet using an Internet service provider).

[0128] The flow chart and block diagram in the accompanying drawings illustrate the possible architecture, function and operation of the system, method and computer program product according to various embodiments of the present application. In this regard, each square box in the flow chart or block diagram can represent a module, a program segment or a part of a code, and the module, the program segment or a part of the code contains one or more executable instructions for realizing the specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions marked in the square box can also occur in a sequence different from that marked in the accompanying drawings. For example, two square boxes represented in succession can actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they can sometimes be executed in the opposite order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each square box in the block diagram and / or flow chart, and the combination of the square boxes in the block diagram and / or flow chart can be implemented with a dedicated hardware-based system that performs a specified function or operation, or can be implemented with a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0129] The units involved in the embodiments described in the present application may be implemented by software or hardware. The name of the unit does not limit the unit itself in some cases. For example, the first acquisition unit may also be described as a "unit for acquiring at least two Internet Protocol addresses".

[0130] The functions described above herein may be performed at least in part by one or more hardware logic components. For example, without limitation, exemplary types of hardware logic components that may be used include: field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), application specific standard products (ASSPs), systems on chips (SOCs), complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs), and the like.

[0131] In the context of the present application, a machine-readable medium may be a tangible medium that may contain or store a program for use by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, device, or equipment. A machine-readable medium may be a machine-readable signal medium or a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, device, or equipment, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. A more specific example of a machine-readable storage medium may include an electrical connection based on one or more lines, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

[0132] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present application and an explanation of the technical principles used. Those skilled in the art should understand that the scope of disclosure involved in the present application is not limited to the technical solution formed by a specific combination of the above technical features, but should also cover other technical solutions formed by any combination of the above technical features or their equivalent features without departing from the above disclosed concept. For example, the above features are replaced with the technical features with similar functions disclosed in this application (but not limited to) by each other to form a technical solution.

[0133] In addition, although each operation is described in a specific order, this should not be construed as requiring these operations to be performed in the specific order shown or to be performed in a sequential order. Under certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Similarly, although some specific implementation details are included in the above discussion, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the application. Some features described in the context of a separate embodiment can also be implemented in a single embodiment in combination. On the contrary, the various features described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments individually or in any suitable sub-combination mode.

[0134] Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and / or methodological logical actions, it should be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or actions described above. On the contrary, the specific features and actions described above are merely example forms of implementing the claims.

Claims

1. A seismic analysis method based on empirical data, characterized in that: include: Determining dimensional information of the experience database according to a pre-established experience database; Determining, based on the attribute information of the target device, an analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance; Determining the difference between the target device and the reference device according to the dimension information and the analysis result; When it is determined that the difference is within a preset range, it is determined that the seismic performance of the target device is qualified; The attribute information includes a size, and the size includes a depth, a height, and a width, wherein determining, based on the attribute information of the target device, an analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance includes: Determining the overturning risk and the collapse risk of the target equipment according to the depth of the target equipment; The overturning risk of the target equipment is determined according to the height of the target equipment.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The dimensional information includes: motion characteristics, earthquake resistance, and reference device characteristics.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that An impact assessment principle of the target device is determined according to changes in the depth, height, and width of the target device.

4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that: Determining the difference between the target device and the reference device according to the analysis result includes: The analysis result of the target device is compared with the anti-seismic performance of the reference device to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

5. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The dimensional information is a motion characteristic, wherein determining the difference between the target device and the reference device according to the dimensional information includes: The motion characteristics of the target device and the reference device are compared to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

6. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The dimensional information is seismic resistance, wherein determining the difference between the target device and the reference device according to the dimensional information includes: The seismic resistance of the target device and the reference device based on test experience is compared to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

7. A seismic analysis device based on empirical data, characterized in that: include: A first determination module, configured to determine dimension information of an experience database according to a pre-established experience database; A second determination module is used to determine, based on the attribute information of the target device, an analysis result of the attribute information on the seismic performance; A third determination module, configured to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device according to the dimension information and the analysis result; A fourth determination module, configured to determine that the seismic performance of the target device is qualified when the difference is within a preset range; The attribute information includes a size, and the size includes a depth, a height, and a width, wherein the second determining module is specifically configured to: Determining the overturning risk and the collapse risk of the target equipment according to the depth of the target equipment; The overturning risk of the target equipment is determined according to the height of the target equipment.

8. The device according to claim 7, characterized in that The dimensional information includes: motion characteristics, earthquake resistance, and reference device characteristics.

9. The device according to claim 7, characterized in that The second determination module is specifically used to determine the impact evaluation principle of the target device according to the changes in the depth, height and width of the target device.

10. The device according to any one of claims 7 to 9, characterized in that: The third determination module is specifically used to: The analysis result of the target device is compared with the anti-seismic performance of the reference device to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

11. The device according to claim 8, characterized in that The dimensional information is motion characteristics, wherein the third determination module is specifically used to: The motion characteristics of the target device and the reference device are compared to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

12. The device according to claim 8, characterized in that The dimensional information is earthquake resistance, wherein the third determination module is specifically used to: The seismic resistance of the target device and the reference device based on test experience is compared to determine the difference between the target device and the reference device.

13. An electronic device, characterized in that: include: A memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the processor executes the computer program, the method for earthquake-resistant analysis based on empirical data as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6 is implemented.

14. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the earthquake-resistant analysis method based on empirical data according to any one of claims 1 to 6 is implemented.

Images