Method and device for evaluating workload performance of physician

Abstract

The invention discloses a doctor workload performance evaluation method and device. The method comprises the following steps: S1, determining patient information and operation requirements; s2, after preoperative confirmation, various requirements of an operation are recorded through an operation recording module, and the recorded requirements comprise operation consumable cost, operation equipment cost, operation manpower consumption, operation time consumption, operation difficulty confirmation and operation risks; the operation consumable cost is obtained by comparing a material prepared before an operation with a material remaining after the operation; the operation equipment cost is obtained from instruments and equipment used in the operation process; the invention belongs to the technical field of performance evaluation, and aims to solve the problem of no basis for later check by dividing an operation into six levels, comparing and recording each level, evaluating according to data to obtain corresponding performance, and archiving the performance and records. And data management on the performance of the doctor is facilitated.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of performance evaluation, and in particular to a method and device for evaluating physician workload performance. Background Art

[0002] Performance evaluation, also known as performance appraisal or employee assessment, is a formal employee evaluation system that uses systematic methods and principles to assess and measure employees' work behaviors and work results. Performance evaluation is a management communication activity between corporate managers and employees. The results of performance evaluation can directly affect the vital interests of many employees, such as salary adjustments, bonus distribution, and job promotions.

[0003] In the hospital's performance evaluation, each doctor will upload his or her performance to the system through the evaluation device, and then the pipeline operator will review it on the evaluation device to determine the performance. Currently, when the administrator logs into the system, fingerprint pressing is usually used for logging in. However, the fingerprint pressing area of ​​the evaluation device is only used by the pipeline operator for a long time. This results in the pipeline operator's fingerprint being present at the fingerprint pressing area, which may lead to the fingerprint being stolen by criminals, that is, there is a certain security problem. After the evaluation device is used for a long time, a certain amount of dust will accumulate at the speaker, which may affect the sound effect of the evaluation device.

[0004] In addition, current performance evaluation methods often use indicators such as hospitalization completion rate, surgery completion rate, and consultation completion rate. In these methods, the number of patients received by doctors is used for assessment. However, in actual work situations, the individual differences of each patient and the different degrees of difficulty of the disease will lead to large differences in the actual workload required of doctors. Evaluation through social benefit indicators such as medical quality, service quality, and patient satisfaction, and the lack of a basis for subsequent verification, has led to the inability to manage doctors' performance data in a digital way. Summary of the invention

[0005] To this end, the present invention provides a method and device for evaluating physician workload performance to solve the above-mentioned problems in the prior art.

[0006] In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides the following technical solutions:

[0007] A method for evaluating physician workload performance includes the following steps:

[0008] S1: Determine patient information and surgical needs;

[0009] S2: After preoperative confirmation, the surgical requirements are recorded through the surgical record module, including the cost of surgical consumables, surgical equipment costs, surgical manpower consumption, surgical time consumption, surgical difficulty confirmation and surgical risks;

[0010] S3: Finally, the data processing module transmits all data to the evaluation module, which will evaluate the operation according to the indicators of various requirements and archive the performance of the surgical operation workload; specifically:

[0011] The cost of surgical consumables is derived by comparing the materials prepared before surgery with the materials remaining after surgery;

[0012] The surgical equipment cost is derived from the instruments and equipment used during the surgery;

[0013] The surgical manpower consumption is applied for by the operator before the operation, and the surgical personnel are recorded;

[0014] The surgical time consumption was obtained by comparing the preoperative recording time with the surgical end time;

[0015] The difficulty of the surgery is manually determined by hospital experts; the risk of the surgery is manually determined by hospital experts based on the patient's physical condition;

[0016] S4: Determine the patient information including:

[0017] First, the surgical information is input into the system through the input module, and after the system confirms it, the basic information of the patient will pop up for the operator to confirm;

[0018] The surgical operator confirms the patient's name and preoperative examination results through the preoperative confirmation module to confirm whether the patient is capable of undergoing surgery;

[0019] If the patient's physical indicators and age meet the conditions for surgery, the operator clicks "confirm" to proceed with the subsequent surgery;

[0020] If the patient's physical index and age do not meet the conditions for surgery, the operator needs to sign a pending agreement in the system. The system will feedback the pending agreement to the hospital, and the hospital will communicate with the patient and his family before determining whether to perform the surgery.

[0021] S5: After the operation is completed, the operation record module transmits the recorded data to the data processing module, verifies each requirement one by one, and archives it after the operation operator signs and confirms it;

[0022] According to a first aspect of the present invention, a device for evaluating a physician's workload performance comprises an evaluation device body, wherein an upper side of the evaluation device body comprises a fingerprint pressing area, a bottom side of the evaluation device body comprises a speaker, a protective frame is arranged above the fingerprint pressing area, a baffle is arranged at the front of the inner side of the protection frame, a slide plate is arranged behind the baffle, a scraper is arranged at the bottom of the slide plate, the scraper is in contact with the fingerprint pressing area, a spring piece is arranged behind the slide plate, the spring piece is connected to the inner rear side of the protection frame, a dustproof net is arranged on the outer side of the speaker, an installation frame is arranged on the outer side of the dustproof net, a rectangular groove is arranged on the outer side of the installation frame, a mounting plate is arranged inside the mounting frame, a brush is arranged on one side of the mounting plate, and the brush is in contact with the dustproof net.

[0023] Furthermore, the evaluation device body includes an operation panel, and a display screen is provided on one side of the operation panel.

[0024] Furthermore, connecting bolts are provided on both sides of the top of the baffle, connecting ports are provided on both sides of the front inside of the protection frame, the connecting bolts are movably connected to the connecting ports, and a baffle is provided on the bottom of the front of the protection frame.

[0025] Furthermore, limit blocks are arranged on both sides of the slide plate, and limit rails are arranged on both sides inside the protection frame, and the limit blocks are slidably connected to the limit rails.

[0026] Furthermore, threaded rods and limiting rods are respectively arranged on the upper and lower sides inside the installation frame, threaded openings and limiting openings are arranged on the installation plate, the threaded rods are threadedly connected to the threaded openings, and the limiting openings are slidably connected to the limiting rods.

[0027] Furthermore, a motor is provided on one side of the installation frame, and the motor is connected to the threaded rod.

[0028] The present invention has the following advantages: when the baffle opens the protection frame, the rear side of the baffle pushes the slide plate, so that the slide plate slides inside the protection frame and slides to the rear side of the protection frame. When the fingerprint is pressed, the slide plate is driven to rebound by the spring sheet, and the limit block is limited by the limit rail, so that the slide plate remains stable when sliding, so that the scraper destroys the fingerprint, thereby preventing theft by lawless elements. When a lot of dust is collected on the dustproof net, the threaded rod is driven to rotate by the motor, and the limit rod limits the limit port, so that the installation plate slides in the installation frame, that is, the dust on the dustproof net is cleaned by the brush, thereby ensuring the sound effect of the device.

[0029] By dividing surgeries into six levels, comparing and recording each level, and then evaluating based on the data to derive corresponding performance, and by archiving the performance and records, the problem of having no basis for later verification is solved, making it easier to manage data on doctors' performance. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0030] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the main structure of a physician workload performance evaluation device provided by the present invention;

[0031] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the exploded structure of a device for evaluating physician workload performance provided by the present invention;

[0032] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of the inner structure of a protective frame of a device for evaluating physician workload performance provided by the present invention;

[0033] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the inner structure of an installation frame of a device for evaluating physician workload performance provided by the present invention;

[0034] Figure 5 A schematic diagram of the structure of an installation plate of a device for evaluating physician workload performance provided by the present invention.

[0035] In the figure: 1. Evaluation device body; 11. Fingerprint pressing area; 12. Speaker; 13. Operation panel; 14. Display screen; 2. Protection frame; 21. Baffle; 22. Slide plate; 23. Shrapnel; 24. Baffle bar; 3. Scraper bar; 31. Connecting bolt; 32. Limit block; 33. Connecting port; 34. Limit rail; 4. Mounting frame; 41. Rectangular groove; 42. Motor; 43. Threaded rod; 44. Limit rod; 5. Dust net; 51. Mounting plate; 52. Threaded port; 53. Limit port; 54. Brush. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0036] The following is a description of the implementation of the present invention by specific embodiments. People familiar with the art can easily understand other advantages and effects of the present invention from the contents disclosed in this specification. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0037] Example 1

[0038] like Figure 1 to Figure 2As shown, in the embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention, a physician workload performance evaluation device includes an evaluation device body 1, which is the main structure of the device and is used to evaluate the physician's workload. The upper side of the evaluation device body 1 includes a fingerprint pressing place 11, which is the position where the pipeline operator presses the fingerprint. The bottom side of the evaluation device body 1 includes a speaker 12, which is the broadcasting place of the device. The evaluation device body 1 includes an operation panel 13, and a display screen 14 is provided on one side of the operation panel 13. The operation panel 13 is the operation structure of the device, that is, the device is operated through the operation panel 13, and the display screen 14 is used to display the operation of the device. A dustproof net 5 is provided on the outer side of the speaker 12;

[0039] The technical effect achieved by the above embodiment is: the pipeline operator audits the workload of each doctor by pressing the fingerprint at the fingerprint pressing area 11, and the dustproof net 5 is used to prevent dust from entering the speaker 12 and the inside of the device.

[0040] Example 2

[0041] like Figures 2 to 3 As shown, a physician workload performance evaluation device includes all the contents of Example 1. In addition, a protective frame 2 is arranged above the fingerprint pressing place 11. The protective frame 2 is a protective structure for protecting the fingerprint pressing place 11. A baffle 21 is arranged at the front of the inner side of the protective frame 2. A slide plate 22 is arranged behind the baffle 21. A scraper 3 is arranged at the bottom of the slide plate 22. The scraper 3 contacts the fingerprint pressing place 11. A spring piece 23 is arranged behind the slide plate 22. The spring piece 23 is connected to the inner rear side of the protective frame 2. Connecting bolts 31 are arranged on both sides of the top of the baffle 21. Connecting ports 33 are arranged on both sides of the inner front of the protective frame 2. The connecting bolts 31 and the connecting ports 33 are connected. It is movably connected, that is, the connection port 33 is connected by the connection bolt 31, so that the baffle 21 is installed in front of the protection frame 2, and the connection bolt 31 is movable on the connection port 33, so that the baffle 21 opens and closes the front of the protection frame 2, and a baffle bar 24 is provided at the bottom of the front of the protection frame 2, and the baffle bar 24 is used to limit the baffle 21, so as to prevent the baffle 21 from rotating out of the protection frame 2, and limit blocks 32 are provided on both sides of the slide plate 22, and limit rails 34 are provided on both sides of the inside of the protection frame 2, and the limit blocks 32 are slidably connected with the limit rails 34, that is, the limit blocks 32 are limited by the limit rails 34, so that the slide plate 22 remains stable when sliding;

[0042] The technical effect achieved by the above embodiment is: when the baffle 21 opens the protective frame 2, the rear side of the baffle 21 will push the slide plate 22, so that the slide plate 22 slides inside the protective frame 2, and slides to the rear side of the protective frame 2. When the fingerprint is pressed, the slide plate 22 is driven to rebound by the spring piece 23, so that the scraper 3 destroys the fingerprint, thereby preventing it from being stolen by criminals.

[0043] Example 3

[0044] like Figures 2 to 5 As shown, a physician workload performance evaluation device includes all the contents of Example 2. In addition, a mounting frame 4 is arranged on the outside of the dustproof net 5, and the mounting frame 4 is a mounting structure. A rectangular groove 41 is arranged on the outside of the mounting frame 4, and the rectangular groove 41 is a sound outlet structure. A mounting plate 51 is arranged inside the mounting frame 4, and the mounting plate 51 is a mounting structure. A brush 54 is arranged on one side of the mounting plate 51, and the brush 54 contacts the dustproof net 5. A threaded rod 43 and a limiting rod 44 are arranged on the upper and lower sides of the inside of the mounting frame 4, respectively. A threaded opening 52 and a limiting opening 53 are arranged on the mounting plate 51, and the threaded rod 43 is threadedly connected to the threaded opening 52, and the limiting opening 53 is slidably connected to the limiting rod 44. A motor 42 is arranged on one side of the mounting frame 4, and the motor 42 is connected to the threaded rod 43.

[0045] The technical effect achieved by the above embodiment is as follows: the sound is transmitted at the rectangular groove 41. When a lot of dust gathers on the dustproof net 5, the threaded rod 43 is driven to rotate by the motor 42, and the limiting rod 44 limits the limiting opening 53, so that the mounting plate 51 slides in the mounting frame 4, that is, the dust on the dustproof net 5 is cleaned by the brush 54, thereby ensuring the sound effect of the device.

[0046] Working principle: When in use, the doctor uploads his performance through the operation panel 13, displays it on the display screen 14, and broadcasts it on the loudspeaker 12. The pipeline operator reviews the workload of each doctor by pressing the fingerprint at the fingerprint pressing area 11. The dustproof net 5 is used to prevent dust from entering the loudspeaker 12 and the inside of the device. When the baffle 21 opens the protection frame 2, the back side of the baffle 21 pushes the slide plate 22, so that the slide plate 22 slides inside the protection frame 2. After the slide plate 22 slides into the protection frame 2, On the other hand, when the fingerprint is pressed, the slide plate 22 is driven to rebound by the spring piece 23, and the limit block 32 is limited by the limit rail 34, so that the slide plate 22 remains stable when sliding, so that the scraper 3 destroys the fingerprint, thereby preventing theft by criminals. When a lot of dust gathers on the dustproof net 5, the threaded rod 43 is driven to rotate by the motor 42, and the limit rod 44 limits the limit opening 53, so that the mounting plate 51 slides in the mounting frame 4, that is, the dust on the dustproof net 5 is cleaned by the brush 54, thereby ensuring the sound effect of the device.

[0047] S1: Determine patient information and surgical needs;

[0048] S2: After preoperative confirmation, the surgical requirements are recorded through the surgical record module, including the cost of surgical consumables, surgical equipment costs, surgical manpower consumption, surgical time consumption, surgical difficulty confirmation and surgical risks;

[0049] S3: Finally, the data processing module transmits all data to the evaluation module, which will evaluate the operation according to the indicators of various requirements and archive the performance of the surgical operation workload; specifically:

[0050] The cost of surgical consumables is derived by comparing the materials prepared before surgery with the materials remaining after surgery;

[0051] The surgical equipment cost is derived from the instruments and equipment used during the surgery;

[0052] The surgical manpower consumption is applied for by the operator before the operation, and the surgical personnel are recorded;

[0053] The surgical time consumption was obtained by comparing the preoperative recording time with the surgical end time;

[0054] The difficulty of the surgery is manually determined by hospital experts; the risk of the surgery is manually determined by hospital experts based on the patient's physical condition;

[0055] S4: Determine the patient information including:

[0056] First, the surgical information is input into the system through the input module, and after the system confirms it, the basic information of the patient will pop up for the operator to confirm;

[0057] The surgical operator confirms the patient's name and preoperative examination results through the preoperative confirmation module to confirm whether the patient is capable of undergoing surgery;

[0058] If the patient's physical indicators and age meet the conditions for surgery, the operator clicks "confirm" to proceed with the subsequent surgery;

[0059] If the patient's physical index and age do not meet the conditions for surgery, the operator needs to sign a pending agreement in the system. The system will feedback the pending agreement to the hospital, and the hospital will communicate with the patient and his family before determining whether to perform the surgery.

[0060] S5: After the operation is completed, the operation record module transmits the recorded data to the data processing module, verifies each requirement one by one, and archives it after the operation operator signs and confirms it;

[0061] In the above embodiment, it should be noted that in addition to inputting the basic information of the patient, it is also necessary to input the basic information of the surgical operation, the selection of the operating room, etc.;

[0062] The surgery time will be rescheduled, and the patient and family members will be informed of the possible risks, and the patient and family members will sign to confirm the possible risks;

[0063] The data processing module is connected to the input module. If the previous records are wrong, the data can be changed and re-entered through the input module;

[0064] The hospital will determine the specific situation based on the difficulty of previous similar surgeries.

[0065] A method for evaluating physician workload performance. In addition, the surgery information specifically includes the type of surgery, the name of the surgeon, and the name of the patient.

[0066] In addition, when the patient's physical condition does not meet the surgical conditions, the surgeon will further verify the patient's pre-operative examination. For any objectionable examination parts, the surgeon will apply for another pre-operative examination of the patient. If the patient passes the examination, the surgeon will perform another surgery. If the patient still does not meet the surgical conditions, the surgeon will report the matter to the hospital.

[0067] In the above embodiment, it should be noted that the patient and his / her family members need to be notified of the resulting postponement of the surgery.

[0068] In addition, after the operation is completed, the hospital will verify the cost of surgical consumables, surgical equipment, surgical manpower, surgical time, surgical difficulty and surgical risks one by one and then enter them into the surgical record module.

[0069] In the above embodiment, it should be noted that there will be no data conflict between the input data and the recorded information in the data processing module, but the data will be evaluated separately.

[0070] In addition, the evaluation module first evaluates the information recorded by the recording module to obtain the first performance, and then evaluates the data input by the hospital to obtain the second performance:

[0071] In addition, if the data of the first performance and the second performance are the same, records will be kept and archived;

[0072] If the data of the first performance and the second performance are different, the second performance shall be recorded and archived;

[0073] The performance records are archived for later review by the hospital and surgical operators.

[0074] In the above embodiment, it should be noted that the archived performance data makes it easy for the surgical operator to file an objection to the performance; specifically, if the surgical operator believes that the hospital's performance data is low, he or she can extract the archived performance data and file an objection to the hospital, which will be reviewed and verified by the hospital leaders.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating physician workload performance, characterized in that: The specific steps include: S1: Determine patient information and surgical needs; S2: After preoperative confirmation, the surgical requirements are recorded through the surgical record module, including the cost of surgical consumables, surgical equipment costs, surgical manpower consumption, surgical time consumption, surgical difficulty confirmation and surgical risks; S3: Finally, the data processing module transmits all data to the evaluation module, which will evaluate the surgery according to the indicators of various requirements and archive the performance of the surgical operation workload; specifically: The cost of surgical consumables is derived by comparing the materials prepared before surgery with the materials remaining after surgery; The surgical equipment cost is derived from the instruments and equipment used during the surgery; The surgical manpower consumption is applied for by the operator before the operation, and the surgical personnel are recorded; The surgical time consumption was obtained by comparing the preoperative recording time with the surgical end time; The difficulty of the surgery is manually determined by hospital experts; the risk of the surgery is manually determined by hospital experts based on the patient's physical condition; S4: Determine the patient information including: First, the surgical information is input into the system through the input module, and after the system confirms it, the basic information of the patient will pop up for the operator to confirm; The surgical operator confirms the patient's name and preoperative examination results through the preoperative confirmation module to confirm whether the patient is capable of undergoing surgery; If the patient's physical indicators and age meet the conditions for surgery, the operator clicks "confirm" to proceed with the subsequent surgery; If the patient's physical index and age do not meet the conditions for surgery, the operator needs to sign a pending agreement in the system. The system will feedback the pending agreement to the hospital, and the hospital will communicate with the patient and his family before determining whether to perform the surgery. S5: After the operation is completed, the operation record module will transmit the recorded data to the data processing module, verify each requirement one by one, and archive it after the operation operator signs and confirms it.

2. A method for evaluating physician workload performance according to claim 1, characterized in that: The surgical information specifically includes the type of surgery, the name of the surgeon, and the name of the patient. When the patient's physical condition does not meet the surgical conditions, the surgeon will further verify the patient's pre-operative examination. For any objectionable parts of the examination, the surgeon will apply for another pre-operative examination of the patient. If the examination is qualified, the surgeon will perform another surgery. If the patient still does not meet the surgical conditions, the surgeon will report the matter to the hospital.

3. A method for evaluating physician workload performance according to claim 1, characterized in that: After the operation is completed, the hospital will verify the cost of surgical consumables, surgical equipment costs, surgical manpower consumption, surgical time consumption, surgical difficulty confirmation and surgical risks one by one, and then input them into the surgical record module. The evaluation module will first evaluate the information recorded by the record module to obtain the first performance, and then evaluate the data input by the hospital to obtain the second performance. If the data of the first performance and the second performance are the same, the records will be archived; If the data of the first performance and the second performance are different, the second performance shall be recorded and archived, and the recorded and archived performance shall be used for later review by the hospital and the surgical operator.

4. A device for obtaining surgical data in a physician workload performance evaluation method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, comprising an evaluation device body (1), characterized in that: The upper side of the evaluation device body (1) includes a fingerprint pressing area (11), the lower side of the evaluation device body (1) includes a speaker (12), a protective frame (2) is arranged above the fingerprint pressing area (11), a baffle (21) is arranged at the front of the inner side of the protective frame (2), a slide plate (22) is arranged behind the baffle (21), a scraper (3) is arranged at the bottom of the slide plate (22), the scraper (3) is in contact with the fingerprint pressing area (11), a spring sheet (23) is arranged behind the slide plate (22), the spring sheet (23) is connected to the inner rear side of the protection frame (2), a dustproof net (5) is arranged on the outer side of the speaker (12), and a dustproof net (5) is arranged on the outer side of the dustproof net (5). There is a mounting frame (4), the outer side of the mounting frame (4) is provided with a rectangular groove (41), the interior of the mounting frame (4) is provided with a mounting plate (51), one side of the mounting plate (51) is provided with a brush (54), the brush (54) is in contact with a dustproof net (5), the evaluation device body (1) includes an operation panel (13), one side of the operation panel (13) is provided with a display screen (14), connecting bolts (31) are provided on both sides of the top of the baffle (21), connecting ports (33) are provided on both sides of the front of the interior of the protective frame (2), the connecting bolts (31) and the connecting port (33) are movably connected, and a retaining bar (24) is provided at the bottom of the front of the protective frame (2).

5. The device for evaluating physician workload performance according to claim 4, characterized in that: Limiting blocks (32) are arranged on both sides of the slide plate (22), and limiting rails (34) are arranged on both sides inside the protection frame (2), and the limiting blocks (32) are slidably connected to the limiting rails (34).

6. The physician workload performance evaluation device according to claim 4, characterized in that: The upper and lower sides of the interior of the installation frame (4) are respectively provided with a threaded rod (43) and a limiting rod (44); the installation plate (51) is provided with a threaded opening (52) and a limiting opening (53); the threaded rod (43) and the threaded opening (52) are threadedly connected; the limiting opening (53) and the limiting rod (44) are slidably connected.

7. The device for evaluating physician workload performance according to claim 4, characterized in that: A motor (42) is provided on one side of the installation frame (4), and the motor (42) is connected to a threaded rod (43).

Images