Supplier evaluation method and equipment based on data sharing mechanism and medium

Abstract

The invention discloses a supplier evaluation method and equipment based on a data sharing mechanism, and a medium, belongs to the technical field of supply chain management, and aims to solve the technical problem of how to realize data sharing and intercommunication among different service systems, carry out comprehensive, scientific, objective and accurate grade division on suppliers, and improve the evaluation efficiency of the suppliers. In order to improve the efficiency and effect of supply chain management, the technical scheme adopted by the invention comprises the following steps of: constructing a data sharing platform: according to sharing requirements among departments, integrating data resources of each business system according to a unified format, and taking a standardized data directory and data resources as a basis; according to assessment rules and requirements, different evaluation indexes are selected, scheme making is completed, a weight is distributed for evaluation factors in an evaluation index system, and the importance of the evaluation factors in comprehensive evaluation is reflected; establishing an assessment personnel pool, and randomly distributing assessment personnel for different suppliers; performing assessment scoring and data collection; performing comprehensive scoring; and grade calculation and assessment result application.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of supply chain management, and in particular to a supplier evaluation method, device and medium based on a data sharing mechanism. Background Art

[0002] As an enterprise develops to a certain stage, the construction of business systems tends to be professional, distinctive, and differentiated. Business systems such as procurement, supply, scheduling, quality inspection, storage, production, and sales constitute the enterprise's high-end ecology, but also create barriers between business systems.

[0003] In current supply chain management, information differences exist between different departments or organizations, making it difficult to evaluate suppliers comprehensively and objectively. In addition, with the increasing complexity of the supply chain, traditional evaluation methods can no longer meet the needs of enterprises for accurate management of suppliers.

[0004] Therefore, how to achieve data sharing and intercommunication between different business systems, conduct comprehensive, scientific, objective and accurate classification of suppliers, and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of supply chain management is a technical problem that needs to be solved urgently. Summary of the invention

[0005] The technical task of the present invention is to provide a supplier evaluation method, equipment and medium based on a data sharing mechanism to solve the problem of how to achieve data sharing and intercommunication between different business systems, conduct comprehensive, scientific, objective and accurate grading of suppliers, and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of supply chain management.

[0006] The technical task of the present invention is achieved in the following way: a supplier evaluation method based on a data sharing mechanism, the method is specifically as follows:

[0007] Build a data sharing platform: Integrate data resources of various business systems in a unified format according to the sharing needs between departments, break the information islands between systems, and realize the storage, collaboration and integration of supply chain business data based on standardized data directories and data resources, strengthen the interconnected use of data, and enhance the comprehensive application and analysis capabilities of supply chain data;

[0008] Constructing an evaluation index system: Based on supply chain management requirements and industry standards, we will integrate supply chain data sharing services and construct a comprehensive supply chain evaluation index system. The evaluation factors of the comprehensive supply chain evaluation index system include key evaluation factors such as product quality, supply timeliness, service quality, and technical level.

[0009] Formulate an assessment plan: According to the assessment rules and requirements, select different evaluation indicators, complete the plan formulation, and assign a weight to the evaluation factors in the evaluation indicator system to reflect the importance of the evaluation factors in the comprehensive evaluation. The final plan needs to be confirmed by the responsible parties step by step before it can take effect;

[0010] Establish an assessor pool and randomly assign assessors to different suppliers;

[0011] Assessment scoring and data collection;

[0012] Comprehensive rating;

[0013] Grade calculation and application of assessment results.

[0014] As a preferred option, the construction of a data sharing platform is as follows:

[0015] Resource catalog: collect data sources and data elements, extract valuable data from data sources and data elements that can be used for analysis and application, clarify the scope and conditions for sharing and opening data resources, and facilitate the value creation of data across departments, units and organizations;

[0016] Data exchange: Guided by demand and service, we provide information sharing and exchange services in accordance with standardized and normalized processes to improve the level of business collaboration;

[0017] Data monitoring: review the compliance and authenticity of data, the rationality of demand, data desensitization, usage channels, usage time, usage scale and usage purposes, and archive the approval records.

[0018] Preferably, the resource directory is as follows:

[0019] Organize the data sharing needs of various departments;

[0020] Formulate standardized and normalized management requirements, and collect data sources and data elements;

[0021] Integrate data resources to form a resource directory and open it to users;

[0022] Users submit exchange applications for required resource directories on the data sharing platform;

[0023] The administrator / rights owner reviews the user's application;

[0024] After the review is passed, the sharing service is opened and users can obtain data through tokens.

[0025] As a preferred method, the evaluation index system is constructed as follows:

[0026] Identify key factors: Supply chain management experts, procurement departments and key stakeholders of quality management departments jointly participate in identifying key factors that affect supplier performance; key factors of supplier performance include technical level, innovation ability, quality control, delivery punctuality, price competitiveness and service response;

[0027] Construct an indicator system: Based on the identified key factors, integrate the resources of the data sharing platform, screen out the data services that can be applied for, and construct an evaluation indicator system that includes multiple first-level indicators and second-level indicators.

[0028] As a preferred option, the assessment plan is formulated as follows:

[0029] Formulate assessment plans: confirm the assessment cycle, select different evaluation indicators, and complete the plan formulation according to the company's assessment rules and requirements;

[0030] Index weight configuration: assign a weight to each evaluation factor in the evaluation index system to reflect the importance of each evaluation factor in the comprehensive evaluation;

[0031] Approval of assessment plan: After the final plan is submitted, it will take effect only after confirmation by the responsible parties at each level;

[0032] Establish an assessor pool and randomly assign assessors to different suppliers as follows:

[0033] Establish an assessment team: divide the assessment personnel into groups according to departments or sections. Each group should include members from different departments or sections.

[0034] Get assessment objects: Get the suppliers with actual business transactions within the assessment period for assessment;

[0035] Conduct assessment grouping: group the obtained assessment objects according to the number of assessment groups, and randomly formulate assessment groups; if the assessment object does not meet the grouping conditions, randomly select an assessment group.

[0036] As a priority, the assessment scoring and data collection are as follows:

[0037] Set scoring range: Set a scoring range for each indicator. The assessment score must not exceed the range to prevent the individual score or proportion from deviating from the management requirements due to subjective reasons.

[0038] Assessment and scoring: Assessors evaluate the assigned suppliers, and the quantitative indicators are automatically scored based on the preset scoring criteria. For qualitative indicators, assessors collect the supplier's performance data on each evaluation factor and score the data based on the preset scoring criteria.

[0039] As the preferred choice, the comprehensive scores are as follows:

[0040] The supplier's score on each evaluation factor is multiplied by the corresponding weight and then summed to obtain the supplier's score, which is then multiplied by the correction index to obtain the final score;

[0041] Calculate individual scores: multiply the supplier's score for each indicator by the corresponding weight to obtain the individual score for the corresponding indicator;

[0042] Summary score: Add the total scores of all indicators to obtain the supplier's summary score.

[0043] As a preferred option, the grade calculation and assessment results are applied as follows:

[0044] Formulate grading standards: According to the actual needs of the enterprise and market conditions, suppliers are divided into different grades such as S, A, B, C, D, E, etc. according to the comprehensive scores;

[0045] Classification: Compare the supplier's comprehensive score with the set grade standard to determine the supplier's grade; specifically: those with a comprehensive score ≥95 are classified as S-level suppliers; those with a comprehensive score of 90≤<95 are classified as A-level suppliers; those with a comprehensive score of 85≤<90 are classified as B-level suppliers; those with a comprehensive score of 80≤<85 are classified as C-level suppliers; those with a comprehensive score of 75≤<80 are classified as D-level suppliers; those with a comprehensive score of 70≤<75 are classified as E-level suppliers, and so on;

[0046] Result feedback and application: The supplier grading results will be notified to relevant departments and suppliers to facilitate enterprises to formulate corresponding management strategies based on supplier grades; specifically: strengthen cooperation with S and A-level suppliers; adjust the supply volume of B and C-level suppliers to S and A-level suppliers; suspend supply from C-level suppliers and re-admit suppliers; replace D and E-level suppliers.

[0047] An electronic device comprising: a memory and at least one processor;

[0048] Wherein, the memory stores a computer program;

[0049] The at least one processor executes the computer program stored in the memory, so that the at least one processor performs the supplier evaluation method based on the data sharing mechanism as described above.

[0050] A computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, which can be executed by a processor to implement the supplier evaluation method based on the data sharing mechanism as described above.

[0051] The supplier evaluation method, device and medium based on the data sharing mechanism of the present invention have the following advantages:

[0052] (1) The present invention builds a data sharing platform, integrates the data resources of various business systems in a unified format according to the sharing needs between departments, breaks the information islands before the system, and realizes the storage, collaboration and integration of supply chain business data based on standardized data directories and data resources, strengthens the interconnected use of data, and enhances the comprehensive application and analysis capabilities of supply chain data;

[0053] (ii) The present invention comprehensively covers various indicators of supplier evaluation by means of data sharing services;

[0054] (3) The present invention improves the automation and intelligence level of data processing and reduces human intervention;

[0055] (iv) The present invention realizes real-time analysis of data, ensuring the timeliness and accuracy of evaluation;

[0056] (V) The present invention establishes a data sharing resource pool to achieve data sharing and intercommunication between different business systems, and conducts comprehensive, scientific, objective and accurate classification of suppliers to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of supply chain management. It combines scientific weight allocation and data processing technology to achieve a comprehensive, scientific, objective and accurate evaluation of suppliers, and provide a scientific basis for the comprehensive supply chain management of enterprises. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0057] The present invention is further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

[0058] Attached Figure 1 It is a flowchart of the supplier evaluation method based on data sharing mechanism;

[0059] Attached Figure 2 This is a flowchart of the resource directory. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0060] The supplier evaluation method, device and medium based on the data sharing mechanism of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments of the specification.

[0061] Embodiment 1:

[0062] As attached Figure 1 As shown, this embodiment provides a supplier evaluation method based on a data sharing mechanism, and the method is specifically as follows:

[0063] S1. Build a data sharing platform: Based on the sharing needs between departments, integrate the data resources of various business systems in a unified format, break the information islands between systems, and realize the storage, collaboration and integration of supply chain business data based on standardized data directories and data resources, strengthen the interconnected use of data, and enhance the comprehensive application and analysis capabilities of supply chain data;

[0064] S2. Construct an evaluation index system: According to supply chain management requirements and industry standards, complete the integration of supply chain data sharing services and construct a comprehensive supply chain evaluation index system; the evaluation factors of the comprehensive supply chain evaluation index system include key evaluation factors such as product quality, supply timeliness, service quality and technical level;

[0065] S3. Formulate an assessment plan: According to the assessment rules and requirements, select different evaluation indicators, complete the plan formulation, and assign a weight to the evaluation factors in the evaluation indicator system to reflect the importance of the evaluation factors in the comprehensive evaluation. The final plan needs to be confirmed by the responsible party level by level before it can take effect;

[0066] S4. Establish an assessor pool and randomly assign assessors to different suppliers;

[0067] S5, assessment scoring and data collection;

[0068] S6, comprehensive score;

[0069] S7. Calculation of grades and application of assessment results.

[0070] The construction of the data sharing platform in step S1 of this embodiment is specifically as follows:

[0071] S101. Resource catalog: Collect data sources and data elements, extract valuable data from data sources and data elements that can be used for analysis and application, clarify the scope and conditions for sharing and opening data resources, and facilitate the value creation of data across departments, units and organizations;

[0072] S102, Data Exchange: Guided by demand and service, provide information sharing and exchange services in accordance with standardized and normalized processes to improve the level of business collaboration;

[0073] S103. Data monitoring: Review the compliance and authenticity of data, the rationality of demand, data desensitization, usage channels, usage time, usage scale and usage purpose, and archive the approval records.

[0074] As attached Figure 2 As shown, the resource directory in step S101 of this embodiment is specifically as follows:

[0075] S10101. Organize the data sharing needs of various departments;

[0076] S10102. Formulate standardized and standardized management requirements and collect data sources and data elements;

[0077] S10103. Integrate data resources to form a resource directory and open it to users;

[0078] S10104. The user submits an exchange application for the required resource directory on the data sharing platform;

[0079] S10105. The administrator / owner reviews the user's application;

[0080] S10106. After passing the review, the sharing service is opened and users can obtain data through tokens.

[0081] The construction of the evaluation index system in step S2 of this embodiment is specifically as follows:

[0082] S201. Identify key factors: Supply chain management experts, procurement departments and key stakeholders of quality management departments jointly identify key factors that affect supplier performance; key factors of supplier performance include technical level, innovation capability, quality control, delivery punctuality, price competitiveness and service response;

[0083] S202. Construct an indicator system: Based on the identified key factors, integrate the data sharing platform resources, screen out the data services that can be used for application, and construct an evaluation indicator system that includes multiple first-level indicators and second-level indicators.

[0084] The specific details of formulating the assessment plan in step S3 of this embodiment are as follows:

[0085] S301. Formulate an assessment plan: According to the company's assessment rules and requirements, confirm the assessment cycle, select different evaluation indicators, and complete the plan formulation;

[0086] S302, indicator weight configuration: assign a weight to each evaluation factor in the evaluation indicator system to reflect the importance of each evaluation factor in the comprehensive evaluation;

[0087] S303. Approval of assessment plan: After the final plan is submitted, it will take effect only after confirmation by the responsible parties at each level.

[0088] In step S4 of this embodiment, the establishment of an assessor pool and the random allocation of assessors to different suppliers are specifically as follows:

[0089] S401. Establish an assessment team: divide the assessment personnel into groups according to departments or sections. Each group should include members from different departments or sections.

[0090] S402. Obtain assessment objects: obtain suppliers with actual business transactions within the assessment period for assessment;

[0091] S403, performing assessment grouping: grouping the obtained assessment objects according to the number of assessment groups, and randomly designating assessment groups; if the assessment object does not meet the grouping conditions, randomly select an assessment group.

[0092] The assessment scoring and data collection in step S5 of this embodiment are specifically as follows:

[0093] S501. Set scoring intervals: Set a scoring interval for each indicator. The assessment score must not exceed the interval range to prevent the individual score or proportion from deviating from the management requirements due to subjective reasons.

[0094] S502. Assessment and scoring: The assessors evaluate the assigned suppliers, and the quantitative indicators are automatically scored according to the preset scoring standards. For qualitative indicators, the assessors collect the performance data of the suppliers on each evaluation factor and score the data according to the preset scoring standards.

[0095] The comprehensive scoring in step S6 of this embodiment is as follows:

[0096] S601, multiplying the supplier's score on each evaluation factor by the corresponding weight and summing the results to obtain the supplier's score, which is then multiplied by the correction index to obtain the final score;

[0097] S602, calculating individual scores: multiplying the supplier's indicator scores by the corresponding weights to obtain individual scores for the corresponding indicators;

[0098] S603. Summary score: Add up the total scores of all indicators to obtain the supplier's summary score.

[0099] The specific application of the grade calculation and assessment results in step S7 of this embodiment is as follows:

[0100] S701. Formulate grading standards: According to the actual needs of enterprises and market conditions, suppliers are divided into different grades such as S, A, B, C, D, E, etc. according to their comprehensive scores;

[0101] S702. Classification: Compare the comprehensive score of the supplier with the set grade standard to determine the supplier's grade; specifically: a supplier with a comprehensive score ≥ 95 is classified as an S-level supplier; a supplier with a comprehensive score of 90≤<95 is classified as an A-level supplier; a supplier with a comprehensive score of 85≤<90 is classified as a B-level supplier; a supplier with a comprehensive score of 80≤<85 is classified as a C-level supplier; a supplier with a comprehensive score of 75≤<80 is classified as a D-level supplier; a supplier with a comprehensive score of 70≤<75 is classified as an E-level supplier, and so on;

[0102] S703. Result feedback and application: The supplier grading results will be notified to relevant departments and suppliers to facilitate enterprises to formulate corresponding management strategies based on supplier grades; specifically: strengthen cooperation with S and A-level suppliers; adjust the supply volume of B and C-level suppliers to S and A-level suppliers; suspend supply from C-level suppliers and re-admit suppliers; replace D and E-level suppliers.

[0103] Embodiment 2:

[0104] This embodiment also provides an electronic device, including: a memory and a processor;

[0105] Wherein, the memory stores computer-executable instructions;

[0106] The processor executes the computer-executable instructions stored in the memory, so that the processor executes the supplier evaluation method based on the data sharing mechanism in any embodiment of the present invention.

[0107] The processor may be a central processing unit (CPU), or other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSP), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. The processor may be a microprocessor or any conventional processor, etc.

[0108] The memory can be used to store computer programs and / or modules. The processor realizes various functions of the electronic device by running or executing the computer programs and / or modules stored in the memory, and calling the data stored in the memory. The memory can mainly include a program storage area and a data storage area, wherein the program storage area can store an operating system, at least one application required for a function, etc.; the data storage area can store data created according to the use of the terminal, etc. In addition, the memory can also include a high-speed random access memory, and can also include a non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk, a memory, a plug-in hard disk, a smart memory card (SMC), a secure digital (SD) card, a flash memory card, at least one disk storage period, a flash memory device, or other volatile solid-state storage devices.

[0109] Embodiment 3:

[0110] This embodiment also provides a computer-readable storage medium, in which a plurality of instructions are stored, and the instructions are loaded by a processor, so that the processor executes the supplier evaluation method based on the data sharing mechanism in any embodiment of the present invention. Specifically, a system or device equipped with a storage medium can be provided, on which a software program code that implements the functions of any of the above embodiments is stored, and a computer (or CPU or MPU) of the system or device reads and executes the program code stored in the storage medium.

[0111] In this case, the program code itself read from the storage medium can realize the function of any one of the above-mentioned embodiments, and thus the program code and the storage medium storing the program code constitute a part of the present invention.

[0112] The storage medium embodiments for providing the program code include a floppy disk, a hard disk, a magneto-optical disk, an optical disk (such as CD-ROM, CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-ROM, DVD-RYM, DVD-RW, DVD+RW), a magnetic tape, a non-volatile memory card, and a ROM. Alternatively, the program code can be downloaded from a server computer via a communication network.

[0113] In addition, it should be clear that the functions of any of the above embodiments can be implemented not only by executing the program code read by the computer, but also by enabling an operating system operating on the computer to complete part or all of the actual operations based on instructions from the program code.

[0114] In addition, it can be understood that the program code read from the storage medium is written to a memory provided in an expansion board inserted into the computer or written to a memory provided in an expansion unit connected to the computer, and then based on the instructions of the program code, a CPU installed on the expansion board or the expansion unit is enabled to perform part or all of the actual operations, thereby realizing the functions of any of the above-mentioned embodiments.

[0115] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or replace some or all of the technical features therein with equivalents. However, these modifications or replacements do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A supplier evaluation method based on data sharing mechanism, characterized in that: The method is as follows: Build a data sharing platform: Integrate data resources of various business systems in a unified format according to the sharing needs between departments, and realize the storage, collaboration and integration of supply chain business data based on standardized data directories and data resources; Constructing an evaluation index system: Based on supply chain management requirements and industry standards, we will integrate supply chain data sharing services and construct a comprehensive supply chain evaluation index system. The evaluation factors of the comprehensive supply chain evaluation index system include key evaluation factors such as product quality, supply timeliness, service quality, and technical level. Formulate an assessment plan: According to the assessment rules and requirements, select different evaluation indicators, complete the plan formulation, and assign a weight to the evaluation factors in the evaluation indicator system to reflect the importance of the evaluation factors in the comprehensive evaluation; Establish an assessor pool and randomly assign assessors to different suppliers; Assessment scoring and data collection; Comprehensive rating; Grade calculation and application of assessment results.

2. The supplier evaluation method based on data sharing mechanism according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The details of building a data sharing platform are as follows: Resource catalog: collect data sources and data elements, extract valuable data from data sources and data elements that can be used for analysis and application, and clarify the scope and conditions for sharing and opening up data resources; Data exchange: Provide information sharing and exchange services in accordance with standardized and normalized processes; Data monitoring: review the compliance and authenticity of data, the rationality of demand, data desensitization, usage channels, usage time, usage scale and usage purposes, and archive the approval records.

3. The supplier evaluation method based on data sharing mechanism according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The resource directory is as follows: Organize the data sharing needs of various departments; Formulate standardized and normalized management requirements, and collect data sources and data elements; Integrate data resources to form a resource directory and open it to users; Users submit exchange applications for required resource directories on the data sharing platform; The administrator / rights owner reviews the user's application; After the review is passed, the sharing service is opened and users can obtain data through tokens.

4. The supplier evaluation method based on data sharing mechanism according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The evaluation index system is constructed as follows: Identify key factors: Supply chain management experts, procurement departments and key stakeholders of quality management departments jointly participate in identifying key factors that affect supplier performance; key factors of supplier performance include technical level, innovation ability, quality control, delivery punctuality, price competitiveness and service response; Construct an indicator system: Based on the identified key factors, integrate the resources of the data sharing platform, screen out the data services that can be applied for, and construct an evaluation indicator system that includes multiple first-level indicators and second-level indicators.

5. The supplier evaluation method based on data sharing mechanism according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The specific assessment plan is as follows: Formulate assessment plans: confirm the assessment cycle, select different evaluation indicators, and complete the plan formulation according to the company's assessment rules and requirements; Index weight configuration: assign a weight to each evaluation factor in the evaluation index system to reflect the importance of each evaluation factor in the comprehensive evaluation; Approval of assessment plan: After the final plan is submitted, it will take effect only after confirmation by the responsible parties at each level; Establish an assessor pool and randomly assign assessors to different suppliers as follows: Establish an assessment team: divide the assessment personnel into groups according to departments or sections. Each group should include members from different departments or sections. Get assessment objects: Get the suppliers with actual business transactions within the assessment period for assessment; Conduct assessment grouping: group the obtained assessment objects according to the number of assessment groups, and randomly formulate assessment groups; If the assessment object does not meet the grouping conditions, a random assessment group will be selected.

6. The supplier evaluation method based on data sharing mechanism according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The assessment scoring and data collection are as follows: Set scoring range: Set a scoring range for each indicator. The assessment score must not exceed the range to prevent the individual score or proportion from deviating from the management requirements due to subjective reasons. Assessment and scoring: Assessors evaluate the assigned suppliers, and the quantitative indicators are automatically scored based on the preset scoring criteria. For qualitative indicators, assessors collect the supplier's performance data on each evaluation factor and score the data based on the preset scoring criteria.

7. The supplier evaluation method based on data sharing mechanism according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The comprehensive scores are as follows: The supplier's score on each evaluation factor is multiplied by the corresponding weight and then summed to obtain the supplier's score, which is then multiplied by the correction index to obtain the final score; Calculate individual scores: multiply the supplier's score for each indicator by the corresponding weight to obtain the individual score for the corresponding indicator; Summary score: Add the total scores of all indicators to obtain the supplier's summary score.

8. The supplier evaluation method based on data sharing mechanism according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The specific application of grade calculation and assessment results are as follows: Formulate grade standards: According to the actual needs of the enterprise and market conditions, suppliers are divided into different grades such as S, A, B, C, D, E, etc. according to the comprehensive scores; Classification: Compare the supplier's comprehensive score with the set grade standard to determine the supplier's grade; specifically: those with a comprehensive score ≥95 are classified as S-level suppliers; those with a comprehensive score of 90≤<95 are classified as A-level suppliers; those with a comprehensive score of 85≤<90 are classified as B-level suppliers; those with a comprehensive score of 80≤<85 are classified as C-level suppliers; those with a comprehensive score of 75≤<80 are classified as D-level suppliers; those with a comprehensive score of 70≤<75 are classified as E-level suppliers, and so on; Result feedback and application: The supplier grading results will be notified to relevant departments and suppliers to facilitate enterprises to formulate corresponding management strategies based on supplier grades; specifically: strengthen cooperation with S and A-level suppliers; adjust the supply volume of B and C-level suppliers to S and A-level suppliers; suspend supply from C-level suppliers and re-admit suppliers; replace D and E-level suppliers.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: include: memory and at least one processor; Wherein, the memory stores a computer program; The at least one processor executes the computer program stored in the memory, so that the at least one processor performs the supplier evaluation method based on the data sharing mechanism as described in any one of claims 1 to 8.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, which can be executed by a processor to implement the supplier evaluation method based on a data sharing mechanism as described in any one of claims 1 to 8.

Images