Evaluation system and method for group enterprise HSE management

Abstract

The invention provides a group enterprise HSE management evaluation system and method, and the system comprises a data collection module, a rating system building module, a current situation evaluation module, an evaluation statistics module, and a result display module. Various management systems of various sub-companies in a group enterprise are associated with an HSE management evaluation system through cooperation of the modules, so that comprehensive acquisition of various HSE management data in the group enterprise and unification of self-HSE management current rules are realized; and the current HSE management situation of the group enterprise is effectively improved, and the evaluation efficiency and the credibility of the evaluation result are effectively improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of computer data processing, and in particular to an evaluation system and method for HSE management of a group enterprise. Background Art

[0002] As society pays more and more attention to corporate health, safety and environmental issues, group companies are facing more complex HSE management challenges. Current evaluation methods are often one-sided, for example, they only focus on a single factory or department and fail to consider the overall perspective of the group; the evaluation indicators are not comprehensive enough to cover all dimensions of HSE management, including organizational structure, personnel training, risk management, emergency response, etc.; data collection is difficult and inaccurate, and because the existing HSE management evaluation mainly relies on manual work, it is greatly affected by the subjective influence of the evaluator and the evaluation efficiency is low, resulting in low credibility of the evaluation results, making it difficult to provide effective support for the HSE management decisions of group companies. Therefore, the present invention proposes an evaluation system and method for HSE management of group companies. Summary of the invention

[0003] The present invention provides an evaluation system and method for HSE management of group enterprises to solve the above problems. By linking the management of various management systems of various subsidiaries within the group enterprise, the comprehensive acquisition of various HSE management data within the group enterprise and the unification of the current HSE management rules are achieved, thereby effectively improving the current HSE management status of the group enterprise and effectively improving the evaluation efficiency and the credibility of the evaluation results.

[0004] The present invention provides an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise, comprising:

[0005] The data collection module is used to collect HSE management data of each subsidiary through the HSE management system of each subsidiary within the group enterprise and its associated management system through multiple channels;

[0006] The rating system establishment module is used to establish an evaluation management system based on the enterprise HSE management standards and the business characteristics of the group enterprises, and to establish an evaluation tree structure according to the enterprise hierarchy structure, evaluation points and elements of the evaluation management system;

[0007] The current status assessment module is used to collect the target HSE management data of each subsidiary based on the rating tree structure to allocate nodes, and compare and score the allocation result of each leaf node with the corresponding node built-in rules;

[0008] The evaluation and statistics module is used to collect statistics on the scoring results of each leaf node and determine the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary within the group enterprise based on the rating tree structure;

[0009] The result display module is used to generate detailed reports and statistical images for display based on the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and its subsidiaries.

[0010] Preferably, in an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise, the data collection module includes:

[0011] The system management unit is used to obtain access rights to various management systems of various subsidiaries within the group, and automatically generate corresponding access encapsulation keys based on the access rights and access system types, and perform access encryption on the management systems corresponding to the access encapsulation keys;

[0012] A security management unit, configured to generate multiple sets of decryption keys based on the corresponding relationship between the access encapsulation key and the data open permission, and generate a public key and multiple sets of private keys according to the multiple sets of decryption keys;

[0013] Based on the public key, wireless communication channels are established between the evaluation system and various management systems respectively, and a key table is generated according to multiple groups of private keys corresponding to the various management systems and sent to the management account of the evaluation system of the corresponding level;

[0014] The collection control unit is used to, after confirming the need for data collection, send the evaluation task to the corresponding evaluation system management account based on a preset range, obtain the corresponding private key from the key table corresponding to the evaluation system management account, and based on the wireless communication channel, collect the target HSE management data and add the corresponding trigger tag through the wireless communication channel.

[0015] Preferably, in an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise, the collection control unit includes:

[0016] The data processing sub-unit is used to obtain all target HSE management data of each subsidiary and determine the data association relationship between various target HSE management data according to the business association relationship;

[0017] Based on the data association relationship, the target HSE management data of the same subsidiary is tested to determine the redundant data and erroneous data;

[0018] Redundant data is eliminated and erroneous data is marked. A data self-inspection report is generated based on the marking results and sent to the management end. After the data is corrected, the corrected target HSE management data is sent to the rating system establishment module for processing.

[0019] Preferably, in an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise, a rating system establishment module includes:

[0020] The evaluation system establishment unit is used to obtain the enterprise HSE management standards, determine the key points of conventional HSE management, and determine the special HSE management points of each subsidiary within the group enterprise in combination with the business characteristics of the group enterprise;

[0021] Based on the conventional HSE management focus points and special HSE management focus points, an evaluation management system for the group enterprise HSE management status evaluation is obtained;

[0022] An evaluation structure determination unit is used to determine the enterprise level of each subsidiary within the group enterprise based on the preset enterprise level, and determine the evaluation weights of different subsidiaries according to the level determination results;

[0023] At the same time, all evaluation points and elements are obtained, and the initial tree structure is established based on the hierarchical relationship between the evaluation points and elements. The evaluation criteria corresponding to each leaf node are obtained, and the node built-in rules are filled;

[0024] At the same time, according to the special HSE management concerns and evaluation weights corresponding to each subsidiary, trigger tags are generated, and trigger links are established between leaf nodes related to the trigger tags in the initial tree structure to obtain the evaluation tree structure.

[0025] Preferably, in an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise, the status quo evaluation module includes:

[0026] A data distribution unit is used to determine the trigger leaf node corresponding to the current subsidiary based on the trigger tag corresponding to the current subsidiary, obtain an exclusive evaluation tree structure, and distribute the target HSE management data corresponding to the current subsidiary to the corresponding leaf node according to the corresponding relationship between the target HSE management data corresponding to the current subsidiary and the data types corresponding to each leaf node;

[0027] The automatic evaluation unit is used to compare the target HSE management sub-data in the leaf node with its corresponding rating standard, and the gap between the actual operation and standard operation of the corresponding evaluation points of the current subsidiary; and score the evaluation points corresponding to the leaf node according to the gap.

[0028] Preferably, in an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise, the evaluation statistics module includes:

[0029] A first result statistics unit is used to count the scores of each leaf node in the exclusive evaluation tree structure corresponding to the current subsidiary after all leaf nodes have been scored, and determine the score of the parent node corresponding to each leaf node according to the statistical result;

[0030] Determine the evaluation result of the management status of the current subsidiary based on the scores of each parent node and leaf node;

[0031] The second result statistics unit is used to obtain the management status evaluation results corresponding to all subsidiaries in the group enterprise, and obtain the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise in combination with the evaluation weights corresponding to different subsidiaries.

[0032] Preferably, in an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise, the first result statistics unit includes:

[0033] The HSE level determination subunit is used to obtain the score of each leaf node corresponding to the current company, and continue to compare to obtain the minimum score, and use the preset HSE level evaluation reference table as a reference, and determine the first level of the key point corresponding to the leaf node with the minimum score according to the minimum score;

[0034] Obtain the scores of all parent nodes contained in the current subsidiary respectively, and calculate the average score of the parent nodes. With reference to the preset HSE level evaluation reference table, determine the second level of the element corresponding to the parent node according to the average score of the parent node;

[0035] At the same time, the score of the parent node corresponding to the on-site status element is obtained as the target score, and the third level of the parent node corresponding to the on-site status element is determined according to the target score with reference to the preset HSE level evaluation reference table;

[0036] Compare the first, second and third levels and obtain the lowest level as the final HSE level of the current subsidiary.

[0037] Preferably, in an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise, the result display module includes:

[0038] The chart statistics unit is used to obtain the overall management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and its subsidiaries, and to compare the HSE management status in multiple dimensions based on the overall management status evaluation results, and to generate a variety of statistical images for display and storage based on the comparison results.

[0039] The report generating unit is used to generate a text report based on the comparison result, insert a plurality of statistical images into the corresponding positions of the text report, generate a detailed report for storage, and send it to the management end.

[0040] Preferably, in an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise, the result display module further includes:

[0041] The query management unit is used to perform a search based on the query content input by the user, obtain the corresponding statistical image, and display the text according to the sub-report corresponding to the statistical image.

[0042] The present invention provides an evaluation method for HSE management of a group enterprise, which is applicable to any one of the evaluation systems for HSE management of a group enterprise, and is characterized by comprising:

[0043] Step 1: Collect HSE management data of each subsidiary through multiple channels through the HSE management system of each subsidiary within the group enterprise and its associated management system;

[0044] Step 2: Establish an evaluation management system based on the enterprise HSE management standards and the business characteristics of the group enterprises, and establish an evaluation tree structure based on the enterprise hierarchy, evaluation points and elements of the evaluation management system;

[0045] Step 3: Based on the rating tree structure, the target HSE management data of each subsidiary is collected for node allocation, and the allocation result of each leaf node is compared and scored with the corresponding node built-in rules;

[0046] Step 4: Count the scoring results of each leaf node, and determine the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary within the group enterprise based on the rating tree structure;

[0047] Step 5: Generate detailed reports and statistical graphs based on the management status evaluation results of the group company and each subsidiary within the group company for display.

[0048] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has at least the following beneficial effects: the present invention uses the data collection module to collect HSE management data of each subsidiary in the group enterprise through multiple channels in the HSE management system of each subsidiary and its associated management system, thereby realizing all-round data collection, and increasing the coverage of HSE management evaluation while also improving data collection efficiency; then, an evaluation management system is established based on the enterprise HSE management standards and the business characteristics of the group enterprise through the rating system establishment module, thereby obtaining an evaluation system that meets both the HSE management standards and the enterprise's own development requirements, thereby improving the guiding value of the evaluation results for enterprise management decisions, and facilitating the group enterprise to adaptively improve and adjust the internal management of the enterprise according to the HSE management evaluation results, thereby achieving the goal of enhancing the competitiveness of the enterprise; an evaluation tree structure is established based on the enterprise hierarchical structure, evaluation points and elements of the evaluation management system, thereby facilitating each subsidiary in the group enterprise to adaptively adjust the key points of the HSE management evaluation according to the real-time business situation, so that The HSE management evaluation results of each subsidiary are more in line with the actual development of the company, and the credibility of the HSE management status evaluation results is effectively improved; then, the target HSE management data of each subsidiary is collected through the status evaluation module based on the rating tree structure for node allocation, and the allocation result of each leaf node is compared and scored with the corresponding node built-in rule, and the scoring result of each leaf node is statistically analyzed in combination with the evaluation statistics module, and based on the rating tree structure, the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary in the group enterprise are determined, and the automatic evaluation of the enterprise HSE management status is realized, and the standardization of the group enterprise HSE management evaluation rules is realized while improving the evaluation efficiency, and finally, the detailed report and statistical image are generated based on the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary in the group enterprise through the result display module, and the visualization of the HSE management status evaluation results is realized, which provides a basis for the adjustment of the management strategy of the group enterprise and each subsidiary in the group enterprise. The present invention realizes the comprehensive acquisition of various HSE management data in the group enterprise and the unification of the self-HSE management status rules by associating various management systems of each subsidiary in the group enterprise with the HSE management evaluation system, effectively improving the HSE management status of the group enterprise and effectively improving the evaluation efficiency and the credibility of the evaluation results.

[0049] Other features and advantages of the present invention will be described in the following description, and partly become apparent from the description, or understood by practicing the present invention. The purpose and other advantages of the present invention can be realized and obtained by the structures specifically pointed out in this application document.

[0050] The technical solution of the present invention is further described in detail below through the accompanying drawings and embodiments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0051] The accompanying drawings are used to provide a further understanding of the present invention and constitute a part of the specification. Together with the embodiments of the present invention, they are used to explain the present invention and do not constitute a limitation of the present invention. In the accompanying drawings:

[0052] Figure 1 This is a structural diagram of an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise of the present invention;

[0053] Figure 2 This is a structural diagram of a data acquisition module of an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise of the present invention;

[0054] Figure 3 A structural diagram of a module for establishing a rating system for an evaluation system of HSE management of a group enterprise according to the present invention;

[0055] Figure 4 This is a structural diagram of a status evaluation module of an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise of the present invention;

[0056] Figure 5 This is a structural diagram of an evaluation statistics module of an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise of the present invention;

[0057] Figure 6 This is a structural diagram of a result display module of an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise of the present invention;

[0058] Figure 7 The present invention is a flow chart of an evaluation method for HSE management of a group enterprise. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0059] The preferred embodiments of the present invention are described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the preferred embodiments described herein are only used to illustrate and explain the present invention, and are not used to limit the present invention.

[0060] Embodiment 1:

[0061] The present invention provides an evaluation system for HSE management of group enterprises, such as Figure 1 As shown, including:

[0062] The data collection module is used to collect HSE management data of each subsidiary through the HSE management system of each subsidiary within the group enterprise and its associated management system through multiple channels;

[0063] The rating system establishment module is used to establish an evaluation management system based on the enterprise HSE management standards and the business characteristics of the group enterprises, and to establish an evaluation tree structure according to the enterprise hierarchy structure, evaluation points and elements of the evaluation management system;

[0064] The current status assessment module is used to collect the target HSE management data of each subsidiary based on the rating tree structure to allocate nodes, and compare and score the allocation result of each leaf node with the corresponding node built-in rules;

[0065] The evaluation and statistics module is used to collect statistics on the scoring results of each leaf node and determine the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary within the group enterprise based on the rating tree structure;

[0066] The result display module is used to generate detailed reports and statistical images for display based on the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and its subsidiaries.

[0067] In this embodiment, the associated management system includes multiple management systems of various subsidiaries within the group enterprise, and the management systems include but are not limited to a production monitoring system, a personnel management system, a business management system, and a logistics management system.

[0068] In this embodiment, the node built-in rules refer to the audit rating requirements corresponding to each evaluation point (i.e., leaf node), and each audit rating requirement has several scoring items; each audit rating requirement is set with a standard score, and if the distribution data meets the audit rating requirements, the actual score of the scoring item is the standard score, otherwise it is 0 points. The score corresponding to the evaluation point of each leaf node is the sum of the scores of each scoring item:

[0069] Assuming that the score of each scoring item of the evaluation point corresponding to the current leaf node is g, the actual score of the evaluation point corresponding to the current leaf node is:

[0070] n j =g j,1 +g j,2 +…+g j,k , that is, n j =Σg j,i , where i = 1, 2, 3, ..., K;

[0071] Among them, k is the total number of scoring items included in the current evaluation point; n j is the actual score of the evaluation point corresponding to the jth leaf node; g j,1 is the actual score of the first scoring item included in the jth evaluation point; g j,2 is the actual score of the second scoring item included in the jth evaluation point; g j,k is the actual score of the kth scoring item included in the jth evaluation point; g j,i The actual score of the ith scoring item contained in the jth evaluation point.

[0072] The beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: the present invention uses the data collection module to collect the HSE management data of each subsidiary in the HSE management system of each subsidiary within the group enterprise and its related management system through multiple channels, thereby realizing all-round data collection. While increasing the coverage of HSE management evaluation, it also improves the data collection efficiency; then, through the rating system establishment module, an evaluation management system is established based on the enterprise HSE management standards and the business characteristics of the group enterprise, and an evaluation system that meets both the HSE management standards and the enterprise's own development requirements is obtained, thereby improving the guiding value of the evaluation results for enterprise management decisions, and facilitating the group enterprise to adaptively improve and adjust the internal management of the enterprise according to the HSE management evaluation results, thereby achieving the goal of enhancing the competitiveness of the enterprise; an evaluation tree structure is established based on the enterprise hierarchical structure, evaluation points and elements of the evaluation management system, so that each subsidiary within the group enterprise can adaptively adjust the key points of the HSE management evaluation according to the real-time business situation, so that each subsidiary The HSE management evaluation results of the company are more in line with the actual development of the company, and the credibility of the HSE management status evaluation results is effectively improved; then the target HSE management data of each subsidiary is collected through the status evaluation module based on the rating tree structure for node allocation, and the allocation result of each leaf node is compared and scored with the corresponding node built-in rule, and the scoring result of each leaf node is statistically analyzed in combination with the evaluation statistics module, and based on the rating tree structure, the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary in the group enterprise are determined, and the automatic evaluation of the enterprise HSE management status is realized, and the standardization of the group enterprise HSE management evaluation rules is realized while improving the evaluation efficiency. Finally, the result display module generates a detailed report and a statistical image based on the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary in the group enterprise for display, and the visualization of the HSE management status evaluation results is realized, which provides a basis for the adjustment of the management strategies of the group enterprise and each subsidiary in the group enterprise. The present invention realizes the comprehensive acquisition of various HSE management data in the group enterprise and the unification of the self-HSE management status rules by associating various management systems of each subsidiary in the group enterprise with the HSE management evaluation system, effectively improving the HSE management status of the group enterprise and effectively improving the evaluation efficiency and the credibility of the evaluation results.

[0073] Embodiment 2:

[0074] Based on Example 1, the data acquisition module, such as Figure 2 As shown, including:

[0075] The system management unit is used to obtain access rights to various management systems of various subsidiaries within the group, and automatically generate corresponding access encapsulation keys based on the access rights and access system types, and perform access encryption on the management systems corresponding to the access encapsulation keys;

[0076] A security management unit, configured to generate multiple sets of decryption keys based on the corresponding relationship between the access encapsulation key and the data open permission, and generate a public key and multiple sets of private keys according to the multiple sets of decryption keys;

[0077] Based on the public key, wireless communication channels are established between the evaluation system and various management systems respectively, and a key table is generated according to multiple groups of private keys corresponding to the various management systems and sent to the management account of the evaluation system of the corresponding level;

[0078] The collection control unit is used to, after confirming the need for data collection, send the evaluation task to the corresponding evaluation system management account based on a preset range, obtain the corresponding private key from the key table corresponding to the evaluation system management account, and based on the wireless communication channel, collect the target HSE management data and add the corresponding trigger tag through the wireless communication channel.

[0079] In this embodiment, data open permission means that different users correspond to different key passwords, and only when the user enters the corresponding access key decryption password can the corresponding data be obtained and collected.

[0080] In this embodiment, the public key can complete the HSE management system and the corresponding sex management system, and open the lowest level of data access rights. Different private keys correspond to different data open permissions, and users can view and collect corresponding data only after entering the corresponding private key.

[0081] In this embodiment, the key table refers to determining the private keys of all management systems corresponding to different users based on their access rights to multiple management systems, and then generating a table based on the private keys. The table includes the private keys of all management systems. Evaluation system management accounts of different levels obtain different private key tables, and the data ranges they can access are different.

[0082] In this embodiment, the preset scope refers to the pre-set scope of HSE management rating factors, which defaults to all factors. The enterprise can also adjust the scope according to its own business completion requirements. The adjustment of the HSE conceptual status assessment scope has not been implemented, ensuring the function of comprehensively evaluating the HSE management status of the group enterprise, and realizing the enterprise's HSE management status evaluation requirements for each item.

[0083] Among them, all elements include but are not limited to leadership, planning and guarantee, risk awareness, capacity building, risk control, communication and promotion, compliance assurance, risk monitoring, event learning, continuous improvement, on-site status, monitoring, safety, environmental protection, security, energy conservation, and low carbon.

[0084] The beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: the present invention first obtains the access rights of various management systems of various subsidiaries within the group, and based on the access rights and access system types, automatically generates corresponding access encapsulation keys, performs access encryption on the management systems corresponding to the access encapsulation keys, establishes connections between the HSE management evaluation system and various management systems, first encrypts and protects the data of various management systems to improve the security of the management system data, and then generates multiple groups of decryption keys based on the correspondence between the access encapsulation keys and the data open permissions, and generates public keys and multiple groups of private keys based on the multiple groups of decryption keys, providing a basis for the intelligent management of the access rights of various management systems, and then establishes wireless communication channels between the evaluation system and the various management systems based on the public keys, providing a basis for realizing data collection in various management systems by the HSE management evaluation system, and according to the corresponding multiple management systems Multiple groups of private keys generate key tables and send them to the evaluation system management accounts of corresponding levels, realizing the intelligent management of corresponding access rights, so that evaluation system management accounts of different levels can obtain different data, thereby improving the data security in the process of group enterprise HSE management status evaluation. After confirming the need for data collection, the evaluation task is sent to the corresponding evaluation system management account based on the preset scope, which can complete the preliminary identification of the evaluation scope of the group enterprise HSE management status, and realize the intelligent allocation of group enterprise HSE management status evaluation tasks. The corresponding private key is obtained from the key table corresponding to the evaluation system management account, and based on the wireless communication channel, the target HSE management data is collected and the corresponding trigger tag is added through the wireless communication channel, thereby completing the automatic collection of data in the process of group enterprise HSE management status evaluation, while increasing the coverage of HSE management evaluation, also improving data collection efficiency.

[0085] Embodiment 3:

[0086] On the basis of embodiment 2, the acquisition control unit includes:

[0087] The data processing sub-unit is used to obtain all target HSE management data of each subsidiary and determine the data association relationship between various target HSE management data according to the business association relationship;

[0088] Based on the data association relationship, the target HSE management data of the same subsidiary is tested to determine the redundant data and erroneous data;

[0089] Redundant data is eliminated and erroneous data is marked. A data self-inspection report is generated based on the marking results and sent to the management end. After the data is corrected, the corrected target HSE management data is sent to the rating system establishment module for processing.

[0090] The beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: after data collection is completed, the present invention detects the target HSE management data according to the data association relationship between multiple target HSE management data of the same subsidiary, eliminates redundant data and marks the erroneous data, and generates a data self-check report based on the marking result and sends it to the management end, and after the data is corrected, the corrected target HSE management data is sent to the rating system establishment module for processing, thereby realizing data cleaning of the collected data, effectively ensuring the accuracy of the data used in the evaluation process of the HSE management status of the group enterprise, thereby effectively improving the credibility of the evaluation results of the HSE management status of the group enterprise.

[0091] Embodiment 4:

[0092] Based on Example 1, the rating system establishes a module, such as Figure 3 As shown, including:

[0093] The evaluation system establishment unit is used to obtain the enterprise HSE management standards, determine the key points of conventional HSE management, and determine the special HSE management points of each subsidiary within the group enterprise in combination with the business characteristics of the group enterprise;

[0094] Based on the conventional HSE management focus points and special HSE management focus points, an evaluation management system for the group enterprise HSE management status evaluation is obtained;

[0095] An evaluation structure determination unit is used to determine the enterprise level of each subsidiary within the group enterprise based on the preset enterprise level, and determine the evaluation weights of different subsidiaries according to the level determination results;

[0096] At the same time, all evaluation points and elements are obtained, and the initial tree structure is established based on the hierarchical relationship between the evaluation points and elements. The evaluation criteria corresponding to each leaf node are obtained, and the node built-in rules are filled;

[0097] At the same time, according to the special HSE management concerns and evaluation weights corresponding to each subsidiary, trigger tags are generated, and trigger links are established between leaf nodes related to the trigger tags in the initial tree structure to obtain the evaluation tree structure.

[0098] In this embodiment, the conventional HSE management focus points refer to the contents that must be checked and evaluated in HSE management required by the enterprise HSE management standards, such as environmental protection, security, energy saving, low carbon, etc.

[0099] In this embodiment, special HSE management concerns refer to the content of HSE management inspection and evaluation that needs to be determined for each subsidiary based on the business requirements of each subsidiary within the group enterprise. For example, a subsidiary that manages engineering projects needs to conduct a corresponding evaluation of the on-site status, while a subsidiary that does not manage engineering projects does not need to conduct an evaluation of the on-site status.

[0100] Among them, the site status score is now divided into 7 categories, namely workplace, equipment and facilities, production control, products and materials, ergonomics, HSE and emergency systems, and other scores;

[0101] There are several inspection items under each type of on-site status score. Each inspection item contains two items: inspection quantity and non-compliance quantity. Both the inspection quantity and non-compliance quantity are integers not less than 0, and the non-compliance quantity is less than or equal to the inspection quantity. The inspection quantity and non-compliance quantity of the on-site status are the sum of the inspection quantity and non-compliance quantity of the inspection items under it.

[0102] In this embodiment, the enterprise levels include level one, level two, level three, and level four, and different levels have different evaluation weights in the overall evaluation process of the HSE management status of the enterprise group.

[0103] In this embodiment, the trigger tag is a tag generated according to the special HSE management focus and evaluation weight corresponding to the subsidiary, and the tag can trigger all leaf nodes of the evaluation tree structure related to the HSE management status evaluation of the subsidiary.

[0104] The beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: the present invention first obtains the enterprise HSE management standards through the evaluation system establishment unit, determines the conventional HSE management focus points, and determines the special HSE management focus points of each subsidiary within the group enterprise in combination with the business characteristics of the group enterprise; according to the conventional HSE management focus points and the special HSE management focus points, an evaluation management system for evaluating the current status of HSE management of the group enterprise is obtained, and an evaluation system that meets both the HSE management standards and the company's own development requirements is obtained, thereby enhancing the guiding value of the evaluation results for enterprise management decisions, and facilitating the group enterprise to adaptively improve and adjust the internal management of the enterprise according to the HSE management evaluation results, thereby achieving the goal of enhancing the competitiveness of the enterprise; then, the evaluation structure determination unit determines the enterprise level of each subsidiary within the group enterprise based on the preset enterprise level, and determines whether or not to use the enterprise level according to the level determination results. The evaluation weights of the subsidiaries provide a basis for the assessment of the overall HSE management status of the group enterprise; at the same time, all evaluation points and elements are obtained, and the initial tree structure is established based on the hierarchical relationship between the evaluation points and elements, and the evaluation criteria corresponding to each leaf node are obtained, and the node built-in rules are filled in, which provides a basis for the automatic scoring of each evaluation point and each scoring item in the current HSE management status evaluation process. At the same time, according to the special HSE management concerns and evaluation weights corresponding to each subsidiary, trigger tags are generated, and trigger links are established between the leaf nodes related to the trigger tags in the initial tree structure to obtain the evaluation tree structure, which is convenient for each subsidiary within the group enterprise to adaptively adjust the key points of HSE management evaluation according to the real-time business situation, so that the HSE management evaluation results of each subsidiary are more in line with the actual development of the company, and effectively improve the credibility of the HSE management status evaluation results.

[0105] Embodiment 5:

[0106] Based on Example 4, the current status assessment module, such as Figure 4 As shown, including:

[0107] A data distribution unit is used to determine the trigger leaf node corresponding to the current subsidiary based on the trigger tag corresponding to the current subsidiary, obtain an exclusive evaluation tree structure, and distribute the target HSE management data corresponding to the current subsidiary to the corresponding leaf node according to the corresponding relationship between the target HSE management data corresponding to the current subsidiary and the data types corresponding to each leaf node;

[0108] The automatic evaluation unit is used to compare the target HSE management sub-data in the leaf node with its corresponding rating standard, and the gap between the actual operation and standard operation of the corresponding evaluation points of the current subsidiary; and score the evaluation points corresponding to the leaf node according to the gap.

[0109] The beneficial effects of the above technical solution: the present invention determines the trigger leaf node corresponding to the current subsidiary based on the trigger tag corresponding to the current subsidiary through the data allocation unit, obtains the exclusive evaluation tree structure, and distributes the target HSE management data corresponding to the current subsidiary to the corresponding leaf node according to the correspondence between the target HSE management data corresponding to the current subsidiary and the data type corresponding to each leaf node, ensuring that different target HSE data can be quickly matched to the corresponding evaluation criteria, realizing the automatic allocation of different target HSE data of the current subsidiary, and then comparing the target HSE management sub-data in the leaf node with its corresponding rating criteria through the automatic evaluation unit, to find out the gap between the actual operation and the standard operation of the corresponding evaluation points of the current subsidiary; and scoring the evaluation points corresponding to the leaf node according to the gap, realizing the automatic evaluation and scoring of various contents of the enterprise's HSE management status, while completing the standardization purpose of the group enterprise HSE management evaluation rules, it also improves the efficiency of the group enterprise HSE management status evaluation.

[0110] Embodiment 6:

[0111] Based on Example 1, the evaluation statistics module is as follows: Figure 5 As shown, including:

[0112] A first result statistics unit is used to count the scores of each leaf node in the exclusive evaluation tree structure corresponding to the current subsidiary after all leaf nodes have been scored, and determine the score of the parent node corresponding to each leaf node according to the statistical result;

[0113] Determine the management status evaluation level of the current subsidiary based on each parent node and leaf node;

[0114] The second result statistics unit is used to obtain the management status evaluation results corresponding to all subsidiaries in the group enterprise, and obtain the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise in combination with the evaluation weights corresponding to different subsidiaries.

[0115] In this embodiment, except for the scores of the parent nodes corresponding to the leaf nodes included in the on-site status element, the scores are:

[0116] s y =N y / M y *100

[0117] Among them, s y is the score of the evaluation factor corresponding to the y-th parent node; M y N is the applicable score of the evaluation factor corresponding to the y-th parent node; y is the actual score of the evaluation factor corresponding to the y-th parent node.

[0118] If there is a triggering leaf node in the leaf node corresponding to the parent node, the scoring standard of the current leaf node is determined to be applicable to the standard score of the current subsidiary, otherwise it is 0, and the applicable score of the evaluation factor corresponding to the parent node is:

[0119] M y =m y,1 +m y,2 +…+m y,h , that is, M y =Σm y,r , where r = 1, 2, 3, ..., h

[0120] Among them, M y is the applicable score of the evaluation factor corresponding to the y-th parent node; m y,1 is the standard score corresponding to the first evaluation point contained in the yth evaluation factor; m y,2 is the standard score corresponding to the second evaluation point contained in the yth evaluation factor; m y,h is the standard score corresponding to the hth evaluation point contained in the yth evaluation factor; m yr1 is the standard score corresponding to the rth evaluation point contained in the yth evaluation factor;

[0121] The actual score of the evaluation factor corresponding to the parent node is:

[0122] N y =n y,1 +n y,2 +…+n y,h , that is, N y =n y,r , where r = 1, 2, 3, ..., h

[0123] Among them, N y is the actual score of the evaluation factor corresponding to the y-th parent node; n y,1 is the actual score corresponding to the first evaluation point contained in the yth evaluation factor; n y,2 is the actual score corresponding to the second evaluation point contained in the yth evaluation factor; n y,h is the actual score corresponding to the hth evaluation point contained in the yth evaluation factor; n yr1 It is the actual score corresponding to the rth evaluation point contained in the yth evaluation factor.

[0124] Assuming that there are W (W = 1, 2, ..., V) checks for each type of site status element, the parent node corresponding to the current status element is calculated as:

[0125] C P =c P,1 +c P,2 +…+c P,W , that is, C P=Σc P,q , where q = 1, 2, 3, ..., W;

[0126] S P =s P,1 +s P,2 +…+s P,W , that is, S = Σs P,q , where q = 1, 2, 3, ..., W;

[0127] Among them, C P is the number of inspections of the P-type on-site status elements; c P,1 The number of inspections for the first inspection of the P-type site status elements; c P,2 The number of inspections for the second inspection of the P-type site status elements; c P,W The number of inspections for the Wth inspection of the Pth category on-site condition element; c P,q S is the number of inspections for the qth inspection of the Pth category on-site status element; P is the number of non-compliant site conditions of category P; P,1 The number of non-compliance in the first inspection of the P-type site condition element; P,2 The number of non-compliance in the second inspection of the P-type site condition element; P,W The number of non-compliance in the Wth inspection of the Pth category on-site condition element; P,q The number of non-compliance in the qth inspection of the Pth category on-site condition element;

[0128] The score of each type of on-site status is equal to the inspection compliance rate multiplied by the weight, and the result is rounded to one decimal place. The score factor of the P-th type of on-site status is x P , weight is Q, then:

[0129] x P =((C P –S P ) / C P )*Q

[0130] The total site status factor score is the sum of the scores of various site factors. Let the total site score be Y, then:

[0131] Y=Σx U , where U = 1, 2, 3, 4, , 5.6, 7;

[0132] In addition, 10 points will be deducted for each major hidden danger in the on-site status inspection. Assuming the number of major hidden dangers is z, the final score L of the on-site status factor is:

[0133] L=Y–z*10.

[0134] The beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: after the scoring of all leaf nodes is completed, the present invention uses the first result statistics unit to count the scores of each leaf point in the exclusive evaluation tree structure corresponding to the current subsidiary, and determines the score of the parent node corresponding to each leaf node based on the statistical results; then the management status evaluation level of the current subsidiary is determined based on the scores of each parent node and leaf node, thereby realizing the automatic evaluation of the HSE management status of the current subsidiary, providing data support for the adjustment of the management strategies of each subsidiary within the group enterprise and the evaluation of the HSE management status of the group enterprise, and then using the second result statistics unit to obtain the management status evaluation results corresponding to all subsidiaries within the group enterprise, and combining the evaluation weights corresponding to different subsidiaries to obtain the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise, thereby realizing the automatic evaluation of the HSE management status of the group enterprise, and providing a basis for the adjustment of the management strategy of the group enterprise.

[0135] Embodiment 7:

[0136] Based on Example 6, the first result statistics unit includes:

[0137] The HSE level determination subunit is used to obtain the score of each leaf node corresponding to the current company, and continue to compare to obtain the minimum score, and use the preset HSE level evaluation reference table as a reference, and determine the first level of the key point corresponding to the leaf node with the minimum score according to the minimum score;

[0138] Obtain the scores of all parent nodes contained in the current subsidiary respectively, and calculate the average score of the parent nodes. With reference to the preset HSE level evaluation reference table, determine the second level of the element corresponding to the parent node according to the average score of the parent node;

[0139] At the same time, the score of the parent node corresponding to the on-site status element is obtained as the target score, and the third level of the parent node corresponding to the on-site status element is determined according to the target score with reference to the preset HSE level evaluation reference table;

[0140] Compare the first, second and third levels and obtain the lowest level as the final HSE level of the current subsidiary.

[0141] In this embodiment, the preset HSE level evaluation reference table refers to the enterprise HSE level determination standard preset and stored in the system database, and scores in different intervals correspond to different HSE levels.

[0142] In this embodiment, the minimum level refers to the minimum level among the first level, the second level and the third level.

[0143] In this embodiment, the leaf node score, parent node score and on-site status score are all non-zero scores. When the HSE management evaluation of a subsidiary is not in the current status, only the first and second scores need to be compared to obtain the minimum level as the final HSE level of the current subsidiary.

[0144] The beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: the present invention obtains the score of each leaf node corresponding to the current company through the HSE level determination subunit, and continues to compare to obtain the minimum score, and with reference to the preset HSE level evaluation reference table, according to the minimum score, determines the first level of the key point corresponding to the leaf node with the minimum score; obtains the scores of all parent nodes contained in the current subsidiary respectively, and calculates the average score of the parent node, with reference to the preset HSE level evaluation reference table, according to the average score of the parent node, determines the second level of the element corresponding to the parent node; at the same time, obtains the score of the parent node corresponding to the field status element as the target score, and with reference to the preset HSE level evaluation reference table, according to the target score, determines the third level of the parent node corresponding to the field status element; determines the levels corresponding to the single minimum key point score, the average score of all elements, and the final score of the field status, and compares them, and uses the minimum level as the final HSE level of the current subsidiary, thereby realizing the automatic evaluation of the HSE management status of each subsidiary in the group enterprise, and providing data support for the adjustment of the management strategy of each subsidiary in the group enterprise and the evaluation of the HSE management status of the group enterprise.

[0145] Embodiment 8:

[0146] Based on Example 1, the result display module, such as Figure 6 As shown, including:

[0147] The chart statistics unit is used to obtain the overall management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and its subsidiaries, and to compare the HSE management status in multiple dimensions based on the overall management status evaluation results, and to generate a variety of statistical images for display and storage based on the comparison results.

[0148] A report generating unit, configured to generate a text report based on the comparison result, insert a plurality of statistical images into corresponding positions of the text report, generate a detailed report for storage, and send it to the management terminal;

[0149] The query management unit is used to perform a search based on the query content input by the user, obtain the corresponding statistical image, and display the text according to the sub-report corresponding to the statistical image.

[0150] In this embodiment, the statistical images are displayed through data tables, line graphs, bar graphs, and radar charts, which include not only independent or cross-statistical analysis and comparison of various dimensions of evaluation scores and evaluation levels, but also comparisons between enterprises, comparisons between audits of different years or types of enterprises, distribution of enterprises in different score or grade ranges, and location analysis of a certain enterprise in various dimensional indicators of the custom enterprise-wide audit results, specifically including vertical comparison of grades; horizontal comparison of grades; distribution of the number of enterprises by grade; location comparison of grades; vertical comparison of scores; horizontal comparison of scores; distribution of the number of scoring enterprises; location comparison of scores; vertical comparison of problems; and horizontal comparison of problems.

[0151] When comparing grades vertically, the sample range is filtered through a combination of multiple conditions such as the initiating unit, the audited unit, and the audit time, and the grades of enterprises that have been audited multiple times or in different years are queried and analyzed, and displayed in data tables, line graphs, bar graphs, and radar charts.

[0152] in:

[0153] If the enterprise is a non-management enterprise, statistics are compared between each audit; if the enterprise is a management enterprise, statistics are compared between different years;

[0154] Table: If the enterprise is a non-management enterprise, the table shows the enterprise's audit scores horizontally; if the enterprise is a management enterprise, the table shows different years horizontally; the table shows the audited enterprises vertically.

[0155] Line chart: If the enterprise is a non-management enterprise, the horizontal axis of the line chart represents each audit; if the enterprise is a management enterprise, the horizontal axis represents different years; the vertical axis represents the audit level, and the line represents the audit level of the currently selected enterprise in each audit or each year. The line chart shows the trend of the audit level changes of the enterprise in several audits or different years;

[0156] Bar chart: If the enterprise is a non-management type enterprise, the horizontal axis represents the various audits; if the enterprise is a management type enterprise, the horizontal axis represents different years; the vertical axis represents the audit level, and different columns represent the audit levels of the enterprise at various times or in each year.

[0157] Radar chart: If the enterprise is a non-management enterprise, different directions of the radar represent each audit. If the enterprise is a management enterprise, different directions of the radar represent different years. The value represents the audit level, and each audit result is represented by a different color.

[0158] When comparing grades horizontally, the sample range is filtered through a combination of multiple conditions such as the initiating unit, the audited unit, and the audit time, and the differences in the audit results between enterprises are queried and analyzed, and displayed in data tables, line graphs, bar graphs, and radar charts.

[0159] in:

[0160] Table: The horizontal section shows the enterprise's most recent audit grade, the highest comprehensive grade, the average comprehensive grade and the lowest comprehensive grade. The vertical section shows the audited enterprises. By default, you can view the grades of all enterprises at this level and below.

[0161] Line chart: The horizontal axis represents different enterprises, the vertical axis represents the audit level, and the lines of different colors represent the most recent audit level, the highest level, the average level and the lowest level of the currently selected enterprise.

[0162] The horizontal axis of the bar chart represents different enterprises, and the vertical axis represents the audit level. The columns of different colors represent the comparison of the most recent audit level, the highest level, the average level and the lowest level of the currently selected enterprise.

[0163] Radar chart, different directions of the radar represent different enterprises, the value represents the audit level, and different colors represent the most recent audit level, the highest level, the average level and the lowest level of the currently selected enterprise.

[0164] Number and distribution of enterprises by grade: filter the sample range through a combination of multiple conditions such as initiating unit, audited unit, and audit time, set benchmark sampling standards (most recent audit / highest grade / lowest grade / average grade), query and analyze the number of secondary units and enterprise distribution of different audit result grades, and display them in data tables, line charts, bar charts, and radar charts.

[0165] The horizontal axis of the line chart represents the audit level, and the vertical axis represents the number. Lines of different colors represent the number of enterprises and secondary units at different audit levels.

[0166] The horizontal axis of the bar chart represents the audit level, and the vertical axis represents the quantity. Columns of different colors represent the number of enterprises and secondary units corresponding to the current audit level.

[0167] The different colors of the pie chart represent the number of companies at different audit levels and their proportions. Hovering the mouse will display the number of secondary units and companies at that level.

[0168] Comparison of grade and location: filter the sample range through a combination of multiple conditions such as the initiating unit, the audited unit, and the audit time, set the benchmarking sampling standard (same as above), set the benchmarking enterprise range, query and analyze the positioning of the audited enterprise with the entire sample range and the benchmarking enterprise range, and display it in data tables and box plots.

[0169] in:

[0170] The table horizontally represents the average grade of audited companies, the lower limit of the average grade of benchmarked companies, the upper limit of the average grade of benchmarked companies, the median of the average grade of benchmarked companies, the lower limit of the (average) grade of the whole sample, the upper limit of the (average) grade of the whole sample, and the median of the (average) grade of the whole sample, where "average" changes according to the sampling criteria.

[0171] The yellow range of the box plot represents the grade range of all audit samples of the company, the green range represents the audit grade range of benchmark companies, the corresponding vertical line represents the median grade of the benchmark company, and the diamond points represent the grade of the audited company to determine the location.

[0172] Vertical comparison of scores: filter the sample range by combining multiple conditions such as initiating unit, audited unit, audit time, and professional classification, and query the scores of enterprises between multiple audits, including factor scores and on-site status scores. It also supports expanding key points and on-site status secondary classification scores, and displays them in data tables, line charts, bar charts, and radar charts.

[0173] in:

[0174] If the enterprise is a non-management enterprise, statistics are compared between each audit; if the enterprise is a management enterprise, statistics are compared between different years;

[0175] Table: If the enterprise is a non-management enterprise, the table horizontally represents the scores of each audit factor of the enterprise; if the enterprise is a management enterprise, the table horizontally represents the scores of audit factors in different years; the vertical dimension represents statistical factors or on-site status.

[0176] Line chart: The horizontal axis represents the various factors, the vertical axis represents the score, and multiple lines represent the company's various audits or the situation in different years.

[0177] Bar chart: The horizontal axis represents the various factors, the vertical axis represents the scores, and different bars represent the company's audits or the situation in different years.

[0178] Radar chart: Different directions represent different factors, and values ​​represent scores. The audit results of each audit rating or different years are represented by different colors. As shown in the example figure, the scores of ten factors of a company's two audits are displayed. Click any factor to expand the key score.

[0179] Horizontal comparison of scores: filter the sample range through a combination of multiple conditions such as the initiating unit, audited unit, audit time, and professional classification, set sampling standards (most recent score / highest score / lowest score / average score), and query the audit scores between companies, including factor scores and on-site status scores. It also supports the display of key points and on-site status category scores, and displays them in data tables, line charts, bar charts, and radar charts.

[0180] in:

[0181] The table shows the different audited companies horizontally and dimensions such as statistical elements or on-site status vertically.

[0182] The horizontal axis of the line chart represents each factor, the vertical axis represents the score rate, and the multiple lines represent the factor scores of each enterprise.

[0183] The horizontal axis of the bar chart represents each factor, the vertical axis represents the score rate, and the different columns represent the audit rating scores of each enterprise.

[0184] Different directions of the radar chart represent different factors, and the values ​​represent the score rate. Each company is represented by a different color. As shown in the example figure, the scores of the three companies in each factor are displayed, forming a comparison of the factor scores among the companies. Click on any factor to expand the key score.

[0185] Number and distribution of scored enterprises: filter the sample range through a combination of multiple conditions such as initiating unit, audited unit, audit time, and professional classification, set benchmark sampling standards (same as above), and query the number of secondary units and enterprise distribution in different audit score ranges according to factor scores / site status scores (supports key points and site status types) and professional scores, and display them in data tables, line charts, bar charts, and radar charts.

[0186] in:

[0187] The table shows the audit rating scores horizontally and the three dimensions of secondary units, enterprises, and total quantity vertically.

[0188] The horizontal axis of the line chart represents the various audit rating levels, the vertical axis represents the number of enterprises, and the multiple lines represent the three dimensions of secondary units, enterprises, and total number.

[0189] The horizontal axis of the bar chart represents the various audit rating levels, the vertical axis represents the number of enterprises, and the different columns represent the three dimensions of secondary units, enterprises, and total number.

[0190] The pie chart shows the distribution of the number of enterprises in each score range. Hovering the mouse will display the number of secondary units and enterprises in that range. As shown in the example figure, the pie chart shows the distribution of the number of enterprises in each score range. Hovering the mouse will display the number of secondary units and enterprises in that score.

[0191] Score position comparison: filter the sample range by combining multiple conditions such as the initiating unit, audited unit, audit time, and professional classification, set the benchmark sampling standard (same as above), set the benchmark enterprise range, query the scores of each element of the audited enterprise or the on-site status (support expansion of key points and on-site status types) and the positioning of the full sample range and the benchmark enterprise range, and display them in data tables and box plots. Among them:

[0192] The table represents the various factors horizontally and the score rates of each category vertically.

[0193] The yellow range of the box plot represents the score range of all audit factor samples of the company, the green range represents the score range of each audit factor of the benchmark companies, the corresponding vertical line represents the median score of each factor of the benchmark companies, and the diamond points represent the score of each factor of the audited company to determine the location; click on any factor to expand the key score location.

[0194] Vertical comparison of problems: filter the sample range by combining multiple conditions such as the initiating unit, audited unit, audit time, and professional classification, and query the problems found between multiple audits of the enterprise, including factors and corresponding problems of the on-site status. It also supports the display of key points and the number of on-site status types, and displays them in data tables, line charts, bar charts, and radar charts.

[0195] in:

[0196] The table shows the various audits of the enterprise horizontally and dimensions such as statistical elements or on-site status vertically.

[0197] The horizontal axis of the line chart represents the various elements, the vertical axis represents the number of issues, and the multiple lines represent the results of each audit.

[0198] The horizontal axis of the bar chart represents the various elements, the vertical axis represents the number of issues, and the different columns represent the results of each audit.

[0199] Different directions of the radar represent different elements, and the values ​​represent the number of problems. The results of each audit are represented by different colors. The figure shows the distribution of the number of problems in ten elements of a company after two audits. Click on any element to expand the key points score.

[0200] Horizontal comparison of problems: limit the sample range by combining multiple conditions such as the initiating unit, audited unit, audit time, and professional classification, set sampling standards (number of problems in the most recent audit / total number), query and compare the problems found between companies, including factors and field status corresponding problems, and support the display of key points and the number of field status types, and display them in data tables, line charts, bar charts, and radar charts.

[0201] in:

[0202] The table shows the different audited companies horizontally and dimensions such as statistical elements or on-site status vertically.

[0203] The horizontal axis of the line chart represents various factors, and the vertical axis represents the number of problems. Multiple lines represent the number of problems in each enterprise.

[0204] The horizontal axis of the bar chart represents the various factors, and the vertical axis represents the number of problems. Different columns represent the number of problems in different factors of each enterprise.

[0205] Different directions of the radar chart represent different elements, and the value represents the number of problems. Each company is represented by a different color. As shown in the example figure, the distribution comparison of the number of problems in the ten elements of the audit of three companies is displayed. Click on any element to expand the key points score.

[0206] The beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: the present invention obtains all management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary within the group enterprise, and performs multi-dimensional HSE management status comparison based on the said all management status evaluation results, and generates a variety of statistical images for display and storage according to the comparison results. The chart statistics unit realizes the multi-dimensional comparison and visualization of the HSE management status evaluation results, and provides a basis for the adjustment of the management strategies of the group enterprise and each subsidiary within the group enterprise; the report generation unit generates a text report based on the said comparison results, inserts a variety of statistical images into the corresponding positions of the said text report, generates a detailed report for storage, and sends it to the management end, so as to ensure that the enterprise can quickly understand the HSE management status of the group enterprise; the query management unit retrieves based on the query content input by the user, obtains the corresponding statistical image, and displays the text according to the sub-report corresponding to the statistical image, so as to realize the accurate display of the statistical content, effectively improve the user's result query efficiency, and enhance the user experience.

[0207] Embodiment 9:

[0208] The present invention provides an evaluation method for HSE management of a group enterprise, which is applicable to any one of the evaluation systems for HSE management of a group enterprise, such as Figure 7 As shown, including:

[0209] Step 1: Collect HSE management data of each subsidiary through multiple channels through the HSE management system of each subsidiary within the group enterprise and its associated management system;

[0210] Step 2: Establish an evaluation management system based on the enterprise HSE management standards and the business characteristics of the group enterprises, and establish an evaluation tree structure based on the enterprise hierarchy, evaluation points and elements of the evaluation management system;

[0211] Step 3: Based on the rating tree structure, the target HSE management data of each subsidiary is collected for node allocation, and the allocation result of each leaf node is compared and scored with the corresponding node built-in rules;

[0212] Step 4: Count the scoring results of each leaf node, and determine the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary within the group enterprise based on the rating tree structure;

[0213] Step 5: Generate detailed reports and statistical graphs based on the management status evaluation results of the group company and each subsidiary within the group company for display.

[0214] The beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: the present invention first collects the HSE management data of each subsidiary in the group enterprise through multiple channels in the HSE management system of each subsidiary and its associated management system, thereby realizing all-round data collection. While increasing the coverage of HSE management evaluation, it also improves the efficiency of data collection; then, an evaluation management system is established based on the enterprise HSE management standards and the business characteristics of the group enterprise, thereby obtaining an evaluation system that meets both the HSE management standards and the enterprise's own development requirements, thereby improving the guiding value of the evaluation results for enterprise management decisions, and facilitating the group enterprise to adaptively improve and adjust the internal management of the enterprise according to the HSE management evaluation results, thereby achieving the goal of enhancing the competitiveness of the enterprise; an evaluation tree structure is established based on the enterprise hierarchical structure, evaluation points and elements of the evaluation management system, thereby facilitating each subsidiary in the group enterprise to adaptively adjust the key points of the HSE management evaluation according to the real-time business situation, so that The HSE management evaluation results of each subsidiary are more in line with the actual development of the company, effectively improving the credibility of the HSE management status evaluation results; then, based on the rating tree structure, the target HSE management data of each subsidiary is collected for node allocation, and the allocation result of each leaf node is compared and scored with the corresponding node built-in rule, and then the scoring result of each leaf node is statistically analyzed, and based on the rating tree structure, the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary in the group enterprise are determined, realizing the automatic evaluation of the enterprise HSE management status, realizing the standardization of the group enterprise HSE management evaluation rules, and improving the evaluation efficiency, and finally generating a detailed report and a statistical image based on the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary in the group enterprise for display, realizing the visualization of the HSE management status evaluation results, and providing a basis for the adjustment of the management strategies of the group enterprise and each subsidiary in the group enterprise. The present invention realizes the comprehensive acquisition of various HSE management data in the group enterprise and the unification of the self-HSE management status rules by associating various management systems of each subsidiary in the group enterprise with the HSE management evaluation system, effectively improving the group enterprise HSE management status, effectively improving the evaluation efficiency and the credibility of the evaluation results.

[0215] Obviously, those skilled in the art can make various changes and modifications to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, if these modifications and variations of the present invention fall within the scope of the claims of the present invention and their equivalents, the present invention is also intended to include these modifications and variations.

Claims

1. An evaluation system for HSE management of group enterprises, characterized by: include: The data collection module is used to collect HSE management data of each subsidiary through the HSE management system of each subsidiary within the group enterprise and its associated management system through multiple channels; The rating system establishment module is used to establish an evaluation management system based on the enterprise HSE management standards and the business characteristics of the group enterprises, and to establish an evaluation tree structure according to the enterprise hierarchy structure, evaluation points and elements of the evaluation management system; The current status assessment module is used to collect the target HSE management data of each subsidiary based on the rating tree structure to allocate nodes, and compare and score the allocation result of each leaf node with the corresponding node built-in rules; The evaluation and statistics module is used to collect statistics on the scoring results of each leaf node and determine the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary within the group enterprise based on the rating tree structure; The result display module is used to generate detailed reports and statistical images for display based on the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and its subsidiaries.

2. According to claim 1, the evaluation system for HSE management of group enterprises is characterized in that: Data acquisition module, including: The system management unit is used to obtain access rights to various management systems of various subsidiaries within the group, and automatically generate corresponding access encapsulation keys based on the access rights and access system types, and perform access encryption on the management systems corresponding to the access encapsulation keys; A security management unit, configured to generate multiple sets of decryption keys based on the corresponding relationship between the access encapsulation key and the data open permission, and generate a public key and multiple sets of private keys according to the multiple sets of decryption keys; Based on the public key, wireless communication channels are established between the evaluation system and various management systems respectively, and a key table is generated according to multiple groups of private keys corresponding to the various management systems and sent to the management account of the evaluation system of the corresponding level; The collection control unit is used to, after confirming the need for data collection, send the evaluation task to the corresponding evaluation system management account based on a preset range, obtain the corresponding private key from the key table corresponding to the evaluation system management account, and based on the wireless communication channel, collect the target HSE management data and add the corresponding trigger tag through the wireless communication channel.

3. The evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise according to claim 2 is characterized in that: Acquisition control unit, including: The data processing sub-unit is used to obtain all target HSE management data of each subsidiary and determine the data association relationship between various target HSE management data according to the business association relationship; Based on the data association relationship, the target HSE management data of the same subsidiary is tested to determine the redundant data and erroneous data; Redundant data is eliminated and erroneous data is marked. A data self-inspection report is generated based on the marking results and sent to the management end. After the data is corrected, the corrected target HSE management data is sent to the rating system establishment module for processing.

4. The evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Rating system establishment module, including: The evaluation system establishment unit is used to obtain the enterprise HSE management standards, determine the key points of conventional HSE management, and determine the special HSE management points of each subsidiary within the group enterprise in combination with the business characteristics of the group enterprise; Based on the conventional HSE management focus points and special HSE management focus points, an evaluation management system for the group enterprise HSE management status evaluation is obtained; An evaluation structure determination unit is used to determine the enterprise level of each subsidiary within the group enterprise based on the preset enterprise level, and determine the evaluation weights of different subsidiaries according to the level determination results; At the same time, all evaluation points and elements are obtained, and the initial tree structure is established based on the hierarchical relationship between the evaluation points and elements. The evaluation criteria corresponding to each leaf node are obtained, and the node built-in rules are filled; At the same time, according to the special HSE management concerns and evaluation weights corresponding to each subsidiary, trigger tags are generated, and trigger links are established between leaf nodes related to the trigger tags in the initial tree structure to obtain the evaluation tree structure.

5. The evaluation system for HSE management of group enterprises according to claim 4 is characterized in that: Situation Assessment Module, including: A data distribution unit is used to determine the trigger leaf node corresponding to the current subsidiary based on the trigger tag corresponding to the current subsidiary, obtain an exclusive evaluation tree structure, and distribute the target HSE management data corresponding to the current subsidiary to the corresponding leaf node according to the corresponding relationship between the target HSE management data corresponding to the current subsidiary and the data types corresponding to each leaf node; The automatic evaluation unit is used to compare the target HSE management sub-data in the leaf node with its corresponding rating standard, and the gap between the actual operation and standard operation of the corresponding evaluation points of the current subsidiary; and score the evaluation points corresponding to the leaf node according to the gap.

6. The evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Evaluation statistics module, including: A first result statistics unit is used to count the scores of each leaf node in the exclusive evaluation tree structure corresponding to the current subsidiary after all leaf nodes have been scored, and determine the score of the parent node corresponding to each leaf node according to the statistical result; Determine the evaluation result of the management status of the current subsidiary based on the scores of each parent node and leaf node; The second result statistics unit is used to obtain the management status evaluation results corresponding to all subsidiaries in the group enterprise, and obtain the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise in combination with the evaluation weights corresponding to different subsidiaries.

7. The evaluation system for HSE management of group enterprises according to claim 6 is characterized in that: The first result statistics unit includes: The HSE level determination subunit is used to obtain the score of each leaf node corresponding to the current company, and continue to compare to obtain the minimum score, and use the preset HSE level evaluation reference table as a reference, and determine the first level of the key point corresponding to the leaf node with the minimum score according to the minimum score; Obtain the scores of all parent nodes contained in the current subsidiary respectively, and calculate the average score of the parent nodes. With reference to the preset HSE level evaluation reference table, determine the second level of the element corresponding to the parent node according to the average score of the parent node; At the same time, the score of the parent node corresponding to the on-site status element is obtained as the target score, and the third level of the parent node corresponding to the on-site status element is determined according to the target score with reference to the preset HSE level evaluation reference table; Compare the first, second and third levels and obtain the lowest level as the final HSE level of the current subsidiary.

8. The evaluation system for HSE management of group enterprises according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The result display module includes: The chart statistics unit is used to obtain the overall management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and its subsidiaries, and to compare the HSE management status in multiple dimensions based on the overall management status evaluation results, and to generate a variety of statistical images for display and storage based on the comparison results. The report generating unit is used to generate a text report based on the comparison result, insert a plurality of statistical images into the corresponding positions of the text report, generate a detailed report for storage, and send it to the management end.

9. The evaluation system for HSE management of group enterprises according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The result display module also includes: The query management unit is used to perform a search based on the query content input by the user, obtain the corresponding statistical image, and display the text according to the sub-report corresponding to the statistical image.

10. A method for evaluating HSE management of a group enterprise, applicable to an evaluation system for HSE management of a group enterprise as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that: include: Step 1: Collect HSE management data of each subsidiary through multiple channels through the HSE management system of each subsidiary within the group enterprise and its associated management system; Step 2: Establish an evaluation management system based on the enterprise HSE management standards and the business characteristics of the group enterprises, and establish an evaluation tree structure based on the enterprise hierarchy, evaluation points and elements of the evaluation management system; Step 3: Based on the rating tree structure, the target HSE management data of each subsidiary is collected for node allocation, and the allocation result of each leaf node is compared and scored with the corresponding node built-in rules; Step 4: Count the scoring results of each leaf node, and determine the management status evaluation results of the group enterprise and each subsidiary within the group enterprise based on the rating tree structure; Step 5: Generate detailed reports and statistical graphs based on the management status evaluation results of the group company and each subsidiary within the group company for display.

Images