A method, system, electronic device and readable storage medium for preventing incorrect routing of line divisions in rail transit control system co-line operations

Abstract

The present invention discloses a method, system, electronic device, and readable storage medium for preventing incorrect handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system. The method comprises: S102, the train is tracking and operating normally online; S103, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail; S104, when the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks whether the basic route condition check has passed; S105, when the basic route condition check has passed, all tracks between the current trigger rail and the route start signal are searched, and all the tracks found are checked to see if any track is occupied; S106, when none of the tracks found are occupied, the LATS system issues a route handling command and waits for the route handling to be successful. The method has the advantage that the method can effectively reduce the risk of incorrect handling of co-line segment routes in co-line operation, thereby ensuring the operational stability of the project and the travel safety of passengers.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of rail transit co-line operation, and in particular to a method, system, electronic device and readable storage medium for preventing erroneous handling of branch routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system. Background Art

[0002] With the rapid economic development and social changes in my country, urban rail transit has gradually transitioned from a single line to a networked structure consisting of multiple lines. Due to the limited and expensive resources in urban centers, many cities have begun experimenting with shared-line operations to effectively utilize them and strengthen connections between suburban areas and urban areas. These advantages include: 1) reducing construction costs by allowing multiple lines to share tracks, avoiding duplication; 2) providing more travel options to meet passengers' diverse travel needs; 3) optimizing resources and increasing capacity, significantly increasing total operating mileage within a limited route length. For example, when two lines are operated on the same line, optimizing train intervals and frequencies can significantly increase the overall capacity of the line; and 4) fully utilizing the remaining capacity of existing lines.

[0003] Based on the above, we can see that co-line operation is an efficient and new operation model. However, in actual application, due to the complexity of co-line operation and other factors, it is easy to make mistakes in handling the co-line segment route. However, there are currently few teams conducting research and development to solve and improve this problem.

[0004] It will be understood that the above statements merely provide background technology related to the present invention and do not necessarily constitute prior art. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method, system, electronic device and readable storage medium for preventing the incorrect handling of branch line routes in the common line operation of the rail transit control system. The method uses the LATS system to check the route conditions, whether the track section from the trigger rail to the route starting signal is occupied, etc., which can effectively reduce the risk of incorrect handling of common line segment routes in common line operation, provide protection for the project's operational stability and passenger travel safety, and help ensure the accuracy and safety of train online operation.

[0006] In order to achieve the above object, the present invention is implemented through the following technical solutions:

[0007] A method for preventing incorrect routing of branch lines in a rail transit control system for co-line operation, comprising:

[0008] S102, the train is running normally online;

[0009] S103, LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail;

[0010] S104. When the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks whether the basic route condition check has passed;

[0011] S105. When the basic route condition check passes, all tracks between the current trigger track and the route start signal are searched, and all the tracks found are checked to see if any track is occupied.

[0012] S106. When none of the found tracks is occupied, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.

[0013] Optionally, in S103, the LATS system periodically detects whether the train is on the trigger rail. If the LATS system detects that the train is not on the trigger rail in the current cycle, the system waits for the LATS system to detect whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0014] Optionally, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in a period of 1 second.

[0015] Optionally, basic route condition checks include: checking the equipment occupancy status and switch locking status within the route.

[0016] Optionally, in S104, if the basic check of the route conditions fails, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0017] Optionally, also include:

[0018] S107. If any of the found tracks is occupied, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system checks in the next cycle whether the train is on the trigger track.

[0019] Optionally, before S102, the step further includes:

[0020] S101, initialization phase, the LATS system reads the parameters in the configuration file.

[0021] Optionally, the parameters in the configuration file include: route trigger rail, basic conditions that need to be checked, different routes corresponding to different destinations, correspondence between train number and line number, correspondence between route and line number, and at least one of the correspondence between route and formation.

[0022] Optionally, in S102, the LATS system executes train tracking logic according to track occupancy and clearance, and the train window of the track where the train is located contains the correct train number and destination number.

[0023] Optionally, also include:

[0024] S205. When the basic route condition check passes, the LATS system searches for the route number corresponding to the current vehicle group number and the route number corresponding to the route to be processed, and determines whether the two route numbers are consistent;

[0025] S206. If the line numbers of the two are the same, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.

[0026] Optionally, also include:

[0027] S207: If the two line numbers are inconsistent, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0028] Optionally, also include:

[0029] S305. When the basic route condition check passes, the LATS system searches for the marshaling corresponding to the line currently selected for route processing and the current train marshaling, and determines whether the two marshalings are consistent;

[0030] S306. If the two groups are consistent, the LATS system issues an access processing command and waits for the access processing to be successful.

[0031] Optionally, also include:

[0032] S307: If the two train formations are inconsistent, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0033] Optionally, in S103, the LATS system narrows the setting range of the trigger rail, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail.

[0034] Optionally, a station server system is provided, wherein the station server system is used to implement the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system.

[0035] Optionally, an electronic device comprises: a memory, a processor, wherein a computer program is stored on the memory, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps of the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system are implemented.

[0036] Optionally, a readable storage medium stores a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system.

[0037] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following advantages:

[0038] The present invention provides a method, system, electronic device and readable storage medium for preventing incorrect handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system. The method uses the LATS system to check route conditions, whether the track section from the trigger rail to the route starting signal is occupied, etc., which can effectively reduce the risk of incorrect handling of co-line segment routes in co-line operation, provide guarantees for the project's operational stability and passengers' travel safety, and help ensure the accuracy and safety of train online operation. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0039] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for the description. Obviously, the drawings described below are one embodiment of the present invention. Those skilled in the art can also derive other drawings based on these drawings without inventive effort:

[0040] Figure 1 A Y-shaped collinear schematic diagram of the present invention;

[0041] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of a cross-type collinearity of the present invention;

[0042] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of a central area collinearity of the present invention;

[0043] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of a method for preventing erroneous routing of a rail transit control system in co-line operation according to the present invention;

[0044] Figure 5 for Figure 3 Schematic diagram of the central area of ​​the common line Zhongbaoshan Road Station;

[0045] Figure 6 A schematic diagram of another method for preventing erroneous routing of a rail transit control system in co-line operation according to the present invention;

[0046] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of another method of the present invention for preventing erroneous routing of branch lines in co-line operation of a rail transit control system. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0047] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention more clear, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative efforts shall fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0048] It should be noted that, in this document, the terms "include," "comprise," "have," or any other variations thereof are intended to encompass non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or terminal device that includes a series of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not explicitly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, article, or terminal device. In the absence of further limitations, elements defined by the phrase "include..." or "comprising..." do not exclude the presence of additional elements in the process, method, article, or terminal device that includes the elements.

[0049] It should be noted that the drawings are all in very simplified form and use non-precise ratios, and are only used to conveniently and clearly assist in illustrating the embodiments of the present invention.

[0050] In actual applications, co-line operation can be applied to different lines in different forms. Take actual projects as an example, Figures 1 to 3 As shown in the figure, there are several specific types: 1) Y-type co-line, such as Chengdu Line 18 and Line 19; 2) Cross-type co-line, such as Hong Kong LAR Airport Line (including the Airport Line and Tung Chung Line); 3) Central area co-line, such as Shanghai Line 3 and Line 4. As can be seen from the above, co-line operation is an efficient and new operation mode. However, due to the complexity of co-line operation, it is easy to make mistakes in handling the co-line segment route. For example, in actual application, it is very likely that the branch route will be handled incorrectly due to factors such as track occupancy, missing train number or train number.

[0051] On the other hand, with the continuous increase in urban populations, demand for urban rail transit is growing. While new lines are constantly opening, existing lines are also adding vehicles to increase capacity. Technological advancements are driving the continuous introduction of new vehicles, resulting in a variety of vehicle types on the same line or across different lines. For example, Shanghai Line 3 features three types of vehicles: the 03A01 electric bus, the 03A02 electric bus, and the 03A03 electric bus; its shared Line 4 has two types: the 04A01 electric bus and the 04A02 electric bus. These different types of vehicles have varying lengths, widths, and interfaces, and mixing them could affect proper functionality. Furthermore, considering the civil engineering and clearance between platforms and trains, these vehicles could potentially lead to safety incidents.

[0052] Figures 1 to 3Center branch route A and branch route B correspond to routes exiting the common line segment and heading to different lines, respectively. Once the route is approved, the signal opening allows some non-CBTC vehicles to proceed. Route approval is primarily based on the current train identification number and basic interlocking conditions. Existing signal systems are based on track circuits for non-CBTC lines, such as Shanghai Lines 3 / 4 and the Hong Kong LAR Airport Line. The ATS train tracking function relies on a single source of track circuit occupancy and clearance status, which cannot guarantee that train numbers will be recognized as expected in extreme circumstances. Therefore, if a scheduled train arrives at the next station with an incorrect train number and stops on the upbound route, the incorrect route may be automatically issued. Furthermore, in extreme scenarios such as interlocking interface data transmission delays or abnormal track circuit transition timing, the possibility of train number loss cannot be completely avoided.

[0053] Based on the above factors, the key point is how to avoid incorrectly handling the branch route when the track is occupied or the train number is lost or has an incorrect train number.

[0054] Based on the above, the present invention provides a method for preventing the wrong handling of branch routes in the common line operation of the rail transit control system, such as Figure 4 As shown, the method includes:

[0055] S101, initialization phase, the LATS system (Local Automatic Train Supervision, station server system) reads the parameters in the configuration file (Ars.cfg).

[0056] Optionally, the parameters in the configuration file include at least one of: route trigger rails, basic conditions to be checked, different routes corresponding to different destinations, correspondence between train set numbers and line numbers, correspondence between routes and line numbers, and correspondence between routes and train sets. Of course, the parameters in the configuration file may also include other data, which is not limited by the present invention.

[0057] S102. The train is running normally on-line.

[0058] Specifically, in S102, the LATS system executes the train tracking logic according to the track occupancy and clearance, and the train window of the track where the train is located has the correct train number and destination number.

[0059] S103. The LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail.

[0060] Furthermore, in S103, the LATS system periodically detects whether the train is on the automatic route trigger rail. If the LATS system detects that the train is not on the trigger rail in the current cycle, the system waits for the LATS system to detect whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0061] Optionally, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in a period of 1 second.

[0062] S104. When the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks whether the basic inspection of the route conditions has been passed.

[0063] Specifically, if the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks the train's route based on the train's destination number to see if it meets the basic conditions for a conditional route. In this embodiment, this basic route condition check includes checking the occupancy status of equipment within the route and the locked status of switches. Of course, other conditions may also be included. Furthermore, if the basic route condition check fails in S104, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system checks whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0064] S105. When the basic route condition check passes, the LATS system searches the data file to find all tracks between the current trigger track and the route start signal. The LATS system determines whether any of the found tracks are occupied.

[0065] S106. When none of the found tracks is occupied, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.

[0066] Furthermore, the method of the present invention for preventing erroneous routing of track routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system further includes: S107, if any track among all the tracks found is occupied, then return to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0067] Based on the above, it can be seen that in the method of the present invention for preventing the incorrect handling of branch line routes in the co-line operation of the rail transit control system, the LATS system checks the route conditions, whether the track section from the trigger rail to the route starting signal is occupied, etc., which can effectively reduce the risk of incorrect handling of co-line segment routes in co-line operation, provide protection for the operational stability of the project and the travel safety of passengers, and help ensure the accuracy and safety of the train online operation. On the other hand, this method ensures the correct handling of routes through occupancy checks when the operating scenario remains unchanged. It can achieve effective protection through some project specialties in combination with actual conditions within the existing technical framework, has more anti-error logic, and can maximize the accuracy and safety of line operation.

[0068] like Figure 5 As shown, Figure 3 Schematic diagram of Baoshan Road Station in the embodiment. Figure 5As shown, the specific routes for the Baoshan Road outbound co-track section are: X11H-X5H for Line 3; X11H-X7H for Line 4. The trigger rails are tracks TC26H, TC28H, and TC30H at this station. Train 413# entering the station from the upstream side lost its train number due to a communication delay. When train 32758 behind it reached the first trigger rail, it mistakenly triggered the Line 3 route, potentially causing the Line 4 train ahead to enter the Line 3 area, posing a safety risk.

[0069] In practical applications, the above-mentioned method of increasing the occupancy of the inspection section of the present invention can be applied to the co-line operation of the station to reduce the risk of incorrect handling of the branch route. Specifically, after the train passes the basic inspection on the trigger rail and meets the automatic route trigger, the occupancy check of the front track (between the trigger rail and the route starting signal) is added. If any track is occupied, the automatic route condition check fails and the route cannot be automatically triggered. Figure 5 In the process, when car 32758 tries to automatically trigger the X11H-X5H route, it checks the occupancy of TC28H and TC30H. If they are occupied, automatic route processing is not allowed. When the train tries to automatically trigger the X11H-X5H route at TC28H, it checks the occupancy of TC30H. If they are occupied, automatic route processing is not allowed. This can effectively avoid the risk of incorrect triggering caused by the loss of the train set number.

[0070] On the other hand, the method of the present invention for preventing the wrong handling of branch lines in the rail transit control system for co-line operation also includes: in the above S103, the LATS system reduces the setting range of the trigger rail, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail. In this way, the number of trigger rails can be reduced. For example, Figure 5 The original three trigger rails are reduced to a single rail at the front of the route, effectively preventing incorrect route triggering. This approach significantly reduces the risk of incorrect route triggering by modifying the operating scenario, for example, triggering the route only on the original last trigger rail. In other words, this simple modification can significantly reduce the risk of incorrect route triggering.

[0071] Further, such as Figure 6 As shown, the method of the present invention for preventing erroneous processing of branch routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system further includes: S205, when the basic route condition check is passed, the LATS system searches the configuration file, finds the route number corresponding to the current car set number and selects the route number corresponding to the route to be processed, and determines whether the two route numbers are consistent through the LATS system; S206, if the two route numbers are consistent, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.

[0072] Furthermore, the method further includes: S207, if the line numbers of the two are inconsistent, returning to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0073] Based on the above, the present invention provides a method for adding line number checks, and the preceding steps of this method are basically the same as those in the aforementioned method for adding checks on section occupancy. In this method, the parameters of the configuration file read by the LATS system include route trigger rails, basic condition checks, correspondences between train numbers and line numbers, correspondences between routes and line numbers, etc. In this method, the line number correspondence is added to the physical formation of the train through data configuration; and the line number correspondence is added to the specific route that can be automatically triggered. When the automatic route trigger meets the basic condition check, a line number check is added to prevent the wrong route from being handled. The above-mentioned method of checking the line number can effectively reduce the risk of incorrectly handling routes in co-line operations. This method can be seen as a further supplement to the aforementioned solution, which can effectively avoid the risk of trains carrying wrong train numbers and triggering wrong routes. In practical applications, this method of adding line number checks can be applied to Figure 2 This can be applied to cross-line operations to reduce the risk of incorrect routing. Of course, it can also be applied to other line types.

[0074] Further, such as Figure 7 As shown, the method of the present invention for preventing erroneous processing of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system further includes: S305, when the basic inspection of the route conditions is passed, the LATS system searches for the marshaling corresponding to the track line currently selected for route processing and the current train marshaling, and determines whether the two marshalings are consistent through the LATS system; S306, if the two marshalings are consistent, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.

[0075] Furthermore, the method further includes: S307, if the two marshalings are inconsistent, returning to S103, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0076] Based on the above method, the present invention also provides a method for increasing train formation inspection, and the preceding steps of this method are basically the same as the aforementioned method for increasing the inspection section occupancy. In this method, the parameters of the configuration file read by the LATS system include route trigger rails, basic condition checks, correspondence between routes and formations, etc. This method fully identifies the characteristics of each line between the collinear lines, digs out the details, and avoids the risk of erroneous route triggering through simple condition checks. By using the above method of checking train formation, the risk of incorrect route handling in collinear operations can be effectively reduced. In practical applications, this method of increasing train formation inspection can be applied to Figure 1In Y-type shared line operations, this can reduce the risk of incorrect route handling. For example, if one line in a shared line only runs 8-car trains and the other only runs 4-car trains, using train marshaling information to control route handling is an effective method. Of course, this approach can also be applied to other line types.

[0077] Based on the above, the present invention provides a variety of automatic conditions inspection methods for vehicles running on the same line to automatically check the conditions of the route of the same line section, so as to ensure the accuracy and safety of the train running on the line. Figure 4 Based on the methods shown, one or more of these can be selected based on project needs to automatically and strictly control the routing of shared lines. This ensures that the routing is the correct one for the train in question, significantly reducing operational risks associated with incorrect routing due to track circuit tracking anomalies. This approach effectively addresses user concerns and challenges, improves system robustness, and provides a strong guarantee for stable operations on project sites.

[0078] Based on the same inventive concept, the present invention also provides a station server system, which is used to implement the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system.

[0079] Based on the same inventive concept, the present invention also provides an electronic device, which includes: a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored on the memory, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps of the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system are implemented.

[0080] Based on the same inventive concept, the present invention also provides a readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system are implemented.

[0081] Based on the above, it can be seen that the above solutions of the present invention can all be automatically calculated by the background server (electronic device), without involving user operations, and without affecting the use and operation of the existing system, and without disturbing the user while ensuring accuracy. Furthermore, the above solutions have designed a variety of methods applicable to the misplacement of routes for co-line operating lines, which include not only software modification support but also data modification support, and have strong versatility and flexibility. Furthermore, the above solutions can effectively reduce the risk of incorrectly handling routes for co-line segments, and provide guarantees for the operational stability of the project and the travel safety of passengers; further, the above solutions provide solutions to key issues of co-line operations, and provide ideas for subsequent better solutions.

[0082] In summary, the present invention is a method for preventing incorrect handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system. By checking the route conditions and whether the track section from the trigger rail to the route starting signal is occupied by the LATS system, the risk of incorrect handling of co-line segment routes in co-line operation can be effectively reduced, thereby providing a guarantee for the project's operational stability and the travel safety of passengers, and helping to ensure the accuracy and safety of train online operation.

[0083] Furthermore, the present invention adds more condition checks based on the project characteristics on the premise that the basic condition checks for route processing are passed, fully ensuring that the route processed is what the current train needs, which can greatly reduce the operational and safety risks caused by incorrect route processing due to abnormal track circuit tracking, effectively solve the pain points and difficult problems that users are concerned about, improve the robustness of the system, and provide good guarantees for stable operation of the project site.

[0084] Although the present invention has been described in detail through the above preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the above description is not intended to limit the present invention. After reading the above description, various modifications and substitutions of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present invention should be defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for preventing incorrect routing of line entries in a rail transit control system for co-line operation, characterized in that: Include: S102, the train is running normally online; S103, LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail; S104. When the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks whether the basic route condition check has passed; S105. When the basic route condition check passes, all tracks between the current trigger track and the route start signal are searched, and all the tracks found are checked to see if any track is occupied. S106. When none of the searched tracks is occupied, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to succeed. Also includes: S205. When the basic route condition check passes, the LATS system searches for the route number corresponding to the current vehicle group number and the route number corresponding to the route to be processed, and determines whether the two route numbers are consistent; S206. If the line numbers of the two are the same, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to succeed. S207: If the two line numbers are inconsistent, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

2. The method for preventing incorrect routing of line entries in a rail transit control system for co-line operation according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S103, the LATS system periodically detects whether the train is on the trigger rail. If the LATS system detects that the train is not on the trigger rail in the current cycle, the system waits for the LATS system to detect whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

3. The method for preventing incorrect routing of line entries in a rail transit control system for co-line operation according to claim 2, characterized in that: The LATS system detects whether a train is on the trigger rail in a cycle of 1 second.

4. The method for preventing incorrect routing of line divisions in a rail transit control system for co-line operation according to claim 1, characterized in that: The basic inspection of route conditions includes: checking the occupancy status of equipment in the route and the locking status of switches.

5. The method for preventing incorrect routing of line divisions in a rail transit control system for co-line operation according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S104, if the basic route condition check fails, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

6. The method for preventing incorrect routing of line divisions in a rail transit control system for co-line operation according to claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: S107. If any of the found tracks is occupied, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system checks in the next cycle whether the train is on the trigger track.

7. The method for preventing incorrect routing of line entries in a rail transit control system for co-line operation according to claim 1, characterized in that: Before S102, the process further includes: S101, initialization phase, the LATS system reads the parameters in the configuration file.

8. The method for preventing incorrect routing of line divisions in a rail transit control system for co-line operation according to claim 7, characterized in that: The parameters in the configuration file include: route trigger rail, basic conditions that need to be checked, different routes corresponding to different destinations, correspondence between train set number and line number, correspondence between route and line number, and correspondence between route and formation.

9. The method for preventing incorrect routing of line entries in a rail transit control system for co-line operation according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S102, the LATS system executes the train tracking logic according to the track occupancy and clearance, and the train window of the track where the train is located has the correct train number and destination number.

10. The method for preventing incorrect routing of line divisions in a rail transit control system for co-line operation according to claim 1, wherein: Also includes: S305. When the basic route condition check passes, the LATS system searches for the marshaling corresponding to the line currently selected for route processing and the current train marshaling, and determines whether the two marshalings are consistent; S306. If the two groups are consistent, the LATS system issues an access processing command and waits for the access processing to be successful.

11. The method for preventing incorrect routing of line divisions in a rail transit control system for co-line operation according to claim 10, characterized in that: Also includes: S307: If the two train formations are inconsistent, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

12. The method for preventing incorrect routing of line divisions in a rail transit control system for co-line operation according to claim 1, wherein: In S103, the LATS system narrows the setting range of the trigger rail, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail.

13. A station server system, characterized in that: The station server system is used to implement the method for preventing erroneous handling of branch routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system as described in any one of claims 1 to 12.

14. An electronic device, characterized in that: The electronic device includes: a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps of the method for preventing erroneous handling of branch routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system as described in any one of claims 1 to 12 are implemented.

15. A readable storage medium, characterized in that The readable storage medium stores a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the method for preventing erroneous handling of branch routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system as described in any one of claims 1 to 12.

Images