A management method and system for laser cutting conversion control

Abstract

The present invention provides a management method and system for laser cutting conversion control, belonging to the field of laser control technology. Specifically, the method and system include: when it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements based on the embroidery processing results in different similar processing patterns, the embroidery processing pattern is used to determine the movement route of the cutting processing of the laser device in different pattern areas, and the problem processing area in the pattern area is determined based on the historical abnormal data corresponding to the movement route. Based on the distribution data of the problem processing area in different segmented time periods and the proportion of processing time, the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in different segmented time periods is determined, thereby improving the reliability of the embroidery processing results.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the field of laser control technology, and in particular relates to a management method and system for laser cutting conversion control. Background Art

[0002] In order to achieve embroidery processing on fabrics, the existing technical solution provides an embroidery machine laser device for embroidery processing. Specifically, the invention patent application CN202221494041.7 "Blue light laser device and embroidery machine head and embroidery machine having the same" provides an embroidery machine structure using a laser device for embroidery processing. However, the existing technical solution has the following technical defects:

[0003] When using an embroidery machine for embroidery processing, the laser device will inevitably age during use. Therefore, when the laser device is faced with an embroidery pattern, if a fixed cutting processing speed is used, it will inevitably lead to embroidery processing results that are difficult to meet the requirements. This makes how to achieve conversion control of the control speed of the laser device a technical problem that needs to be solved urgently.

[0004] In response to the above technical problems, the present application specifically provides a management method and system for laser cutting conversion control. Summary of the Invention

[0005] To achieve the purpose of the present invention, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:

[0006] In a first aspect, the present application provides a management method for laser cutting conversion control, specifically comprising:

[0007] S1 determines the usage data of the laser device of the embroidery machine in different control power intervals based on the usage data of the laser device, and proceeds to the next step when it is determined based on the usage data in the different control power intervals that the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements;

[0008] S2 determines similar processing patterns of the laser device within a preset time period based on the analysis result of the embroidery processing pattern, and when it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements based on the embroidery processing results of different similar processing patterns, proceeds to the next step;

[0009] S3, using the embroidery processing pattern, determining a movement route of the laser device for cutting processing in different pattern areas, and determining a problem processing area in the pattern area based on historical abnormality data corresponding to the movement route;

[0010] S4 determines the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in different divided time periods based on the distribution data of the problem processing areas and the processing time ratio in different divided time periods.

[0011] The beneficial effects of the present invention are:

[0012] Based on the usage data in different control power ranges, it is determined whether the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements, thereby avoiding the influence of the faster moving speed of the laser device with a more serious aging condition on the embroidery quality, ensuring the reliability of the embroidery processing of the laser device with a more serious aging condition, and also improving the efficiency of determining the differentiated control conversion processing strategy.

[0013] Based on the distribution data of the problem processing areas in different segmentation periods and the proportion of processing time, the control conversion processing strategy of the laser device in different segmentation periods is determined, thereby ensuring the continuity of the control processing of the laser movement speed in the segmentation period where the distribution of the problem segmentation area is relatively dispersed or the processing time accounts for a large proportion, avoiding the influence of frequent switching of the movement speed on the embroidery quality, and ensuring the reliability of the embroidery processing results while also ensuring the efficiency of the embroidery processing.

[0014] A further technical solution is that the control power interval is divided according to the rated power of the laser device and a preset power interval.

[0015] A further technical solution is to determine whether the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements, specifically including:

[0016] Determining the usage time of the laser device in the different control power intervals based on the usage data in the different control power intervals;

[0017] Determining, based on usage durations of the laser device in different control power intervals, a usage duration in which the control power is greater than a preset control power;

[0018] Whether the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements is determined according to the usage time period when the control power is greater than the preset control power.

[0019] A further technical solution is that when the control power of the laser device is greater than a preset control power and the usage time is greater than a preset usage time, it is determined that the aging condition of the laser device does not meet the requirements.

[0020] A further technical solution is that the method for determining the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in different divided time periods is:

[0021] Determining the positioning processing time periods of different problem processing areas in the divided time periods based on the distribution data of the problem processing areas in the divided time periods;

[0022] Determining the intervals between different adjacent positioning processing periods according to the positioning processing periods of different problem processing areas in the divided period, and determining the distribution discrete factor of the laser device in the divided period using a preset discrete coefficient mapped from an average value of the intervals;

[0023] Obtain the processing time ratio of the problem processing area in the divided time period, determine the continuous control demand coefficient of the divided time period based on the product of the processing time ratio and the distribution discrete factor, and use the continuous control demand coefficient to determine the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in the divided time period.

[0024] A further technical solution is that the continuous control requirement coefficient of the laser in the divided time period ranges from 0 to 1, wherein the higher the continuous control requirement coefficient of the laser in the divided time period, the higher the degree of demand for using a fixed control speed for embroidery processing in the divided time period.

[0025] In a second aspect, the present invention provides a management system for laser cutting conversion control, which adopts the above-mentioned management method for laser cutting conversion control, specifically comprising:

[0026] Aging condition identification module, reliability assessment module, problem area identification module, control conversion module;

[0027] The aging condition identification module is responsible for determining whether the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements based on the usage data in different control power intervals;

[0028] The reliability evaluation module is responsible for determining whether the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern meets the requirements;

[0029] The problem area identification module is responsible for determining the problem processing area in the pattern area;

[0030] The switching strategy determination module is responsible for determining the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in different divided time periods.

[0031] Other features and advantages will be described in the following description. The objectives and other advantages of the present invention are realized and obtained by the structures particularly pointed out in the description and drawings.

[0032] In order to make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, preferred embodiments are given below and described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0033] The above and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by describing in detail exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0034] Figure 1 is a flow chart of a management method for laser cutting conversion control;

[0035] Figure 2 It is a flow chart for determining that the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements;

[0036] Figure 3 It is a flow chart for determining whether the distribution discreteness of the cutting risk position of the cloth processing object meets the requirements;

[0037] Figure 4 is a flow chart of a method for determining similar processing patterns of a laser device within a preset time period;

[0038] Figure 5 is a flow chart of a method for determining a control conversion processing strategy of a laser device in different divided time periods;

[0039] Figure 6 It is a framework diagram of a management system for laser cutting conversion control. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0040] To help those skilled in the art better understand the technical solutions in this specification, the following will provide a clear and complete description of the technical solutions in the embodiments of this specification, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of this specification, not all of them. All other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of this specification without creative work should fall within the scope of protection of this specification.

[0041] In the present application, the aging condition of the laser device and the distribution of areas with deviations in embroidery processing in different segmented time periods are used to determine the control conversion processing strategy of the laser in different segmented time periods. This not only avoids the frequent switching of the movement speed of the laser device, but also ensures the reliability of the embroidery processing by controlling the movement speed.

[0042] When the control power of the laser device is greater than the preset control power and the usage time is not greater than the preset usage time, it is determined that the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements.

[0043] Based on the proportion of embroidery defects in different similar processed images, the defect probability of different similar processed objects is determined. When there is a similar processed object with a defect probability greater than 0.1, it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements.

[0044] When the number of embroidery defects when the embroidery process is performed using the moving route of the image area accounts for more than 0.05, the image area is determined to be a problem processing area.

[0045] When the number of problem processing areas in the divided time period is greater than the preset number of areas or the processing time accounts for more than 0.3, the embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed using the second preset control speed;

[0046] When the number of problem processing areas in the divided time period is not greater than the preset number of areas and the processing time accounts for no more than 0.3, the embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed only in the problem processing areas at the second preset control speed, and the embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed at the preset control speed in other areas except the problem processing areas.

[0047] Example 1

[0048] like Figure 1 As shown, the present application provides a first aspect, which provides a management method for laser cutting conversion control, specifically comprising:

[0049] S1 determines the usage data of the laser device of the embroidery machine in different control power intervals based on the usage data of the laser device, and proceeds to the next step when it is determined based on the usage data in the different control power intervals that the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements;

[0050] Furthermore, the control power interval is divided according to the rated power of the laser device and a preset power interval.

[0051] Specifically, such as Figure 2 As shown, determining that the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements specifically includes:

[0052] Determining the usage time of the laser device in the different control power intervals based on the usage data in the different control power intervals;

[0053] Determining, based on usage durations of the laser device in different control power intervals, a usage duration in which the control power is greater than a preset control power;

[0054] Whether the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements is determined according to the usage time period when the control power is greater than the preset control power.

[0055] Optionally, when the control power of the laser device is greater than a preset control power and the usage time is greater than a preset usage time, it is determined that the aging condition of the laser device does not meet the requirements.

[0056] In another possible embodiment, determining that the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements specifically includes:

[0057] Determining the usage time of the laser device in the different control power intervals based on the usage data in the different control power intervals;

[0058] Determine the life impact factors per unit usage time of different control power intervals using the preset life impact factors corresponding to different control power intervals, and determine the interval impact factors of different control power intervals based on the usage time of different control power intervals;

[0059] The sum of the interval influence factors of different control power intervals is used as an aging coefficient, and the aging coefficient is used to determine whether the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements.

[0060] Further, when the aging coefficient of the laser device does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the aging condition of the laser device does not meet the requirement.

[0061] It should be noted that, when the aging condition of the laser device does not meet the requirements, the embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed based on a preset control speed.

[0062] Optionally, determining whether the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements specifically includes:

[0063] Determining the usage duration of the laser device in the different control power intervals based on usage data of the different control power intervals, and determining that the aging condition of the laser device does not meet the requirements when there is a control power interval in which the usage duration does not meet the requirements;

[0064] If there is no control power range where the usage duration does not meet the requirement:

[0065] Determining a sum of the usage times of the different control power intervals based on the usage times of the different control power intervals, and determining that the aging condition of the laser device does not meet the requirements when the sum of the usage times of the different control power intervals is greater than a preset time threshold;

[0066] If the sum of the usage durations of different control power intervals is not greater than the preset duration threshold:

[0067] When the sum of the usage time in different control power ranges is within the preset usage time range:

[0068] Obtaining a usage time duration during which the control power is greater than a preset control power, and when the usage time duration during which the control power is greater than the preset power is less than a preset usage time threshold, determining that the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirement;

[0069] If the sum of the usage durations of different control power intervals is not within the preset usage duration range or the usage duration of the control power exceeding the preset power is not less than the preset usage duration threshold:

[0070] Determining the lifetime impact factors per unit usage time of the different control power intervals based on preset lifetime impact factors corresponding to the different control power intervals, and determining the interval impact factors of the different control power intervals in combination with the usage time of the different control power intervals; when the number of interval impact factors of the control power intervals within the preset impact factor interval does not meet the requirements, determining that the aging condition of the laser device does not meet the requirements;

[0071] When the interval impact factor is within the preset impact factor range, the number of control power intervals meets the requirements:

[0072] The sum of the interval influence factors of different control power intervals is used as an aging coefficient, and the aging coefficient is used to determine whether the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements.

[0073] S2 determines similar processing patterns of the laser device within a preset time period based on the analysis result of the embroidery processing pattern, and when it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements based on the embroidery processing results of different similar processing patterns, proceeds to the next step;

[0074] Furthermore, the preset time period is determined according to the average daily working hours of the embroidery machine, and specifically determined according to a preset matching time period corresponding to the average daily working hours.

[0075] Specifically, such as Figure 3 As shown, the method for determining the similar processing patterns of the laser device within a preset time period is:

[0076] using a historical pattern of embroidery processed by the laser device within a preset time period as a historical reference pattern;

[0077] determining pattern similarity coefficients between different historical reference patterns and the embroidery processing pattern based on similarities between the historical reference pattern and the embroidery processing pattern;

[0078] The pattern similarity coefficient is used to determine whether the historical reference pattern is a similar processing pattern.

[0079] It should be noted that, when the pattern similarity coefficient between the historical reference pattern and the embroidery processing pattern meets the requirement, the historical reference pattern is determined to be a similar processing pattern.

[0080] Optionally, if Figure 4 As shown, determining that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements specifically includes:

[0081] Determine the percentage of defects in the embroidery processing results of the different similar processing patterns based on the embroidery processing results of the different similar processing patterns, and use the percentage as the percentage of defects;

[0082] determining weight coefficients of different similar processing patterns based on pattern similarity coefficients between the different similar processing patterns and the embroidery processing pattern;

[0083] The pattern defect probability of the embroidery processing pattern is determined by the weight coefficients and defect quantity proportions of different similar processing patterns, and the pattern defect probability is used to determine whether the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern meets the requirements.

[0084] Further, when the pattern defect probability is greater than a preset defect probability, it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirement.

[0085] It should also be noted that when the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern meets the requirement, the embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed using the second preset control speed.

[0086] Specifically, the second preset control speed is greater than the preset control speed.

[0087] In another possible embodiment, determining that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirement specifically includes:

[0088] Determining the number of defects in the embroidery processing results of the different similar processing patterns using the embroidery processing results of the different similar processing patterns as the number of defects;

[0089] Determine the defect anomaly probability of different similar processing patterns based on the number of defects and the proportion of defects in different similar processing patterns;

[0090] Whether the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern meets the requirement is determined according to the maximum value of the defect abnormality probabilities of different similar processing patterns.

[0091] It should be noted that, when the maximum value of the defect abnormality probabilities of different similar processing patterns does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements.

[0092] Optionally, determining that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirement specifically includes:

[0093] S21 determines the number of defects in the embroidery processing results of the different similar processing patterns based on the embroidery processing results of the different similar processing patterns, and uses the number of defects as the number of defects. Based on the number of defects in the different similar processing patterns and the proportion of the number of defects, determines the defect abnormality probability of the different similar processing patterns.

[0094] S22 determines weight coefficients of different similar processing patterns based on pattern similarity coefficients between the different similar processing patterns and the embroidery processing pattern;

[0095] S23 determines the pattern defect probability of the embroidery processing pattern according to the average value of the product of the defect abnormality probabilities of different similar processing patterns and the weight coefficients of the similar processing patterns, and uses the pattern defect probability to determine whether the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern meets the requirements.

[0096] Optionally, the above step S21 includes the following contents:

[0097] S211 determines the number of defects in the embroidery processing results of different similar processing patterns based on the embroidery processing results of the different similar processing patterns, and uses the number of defects as the number of defects. If there is a similar processing pattern with a number of defects or a ratio of the number of defects that does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements. If there is no similar processing pattern with a number of defects or a ratio of the number of defects that does not meet the requirements, the process proceeds to step S212.

[0098] S212: based on the percentage of the number of defects of different similar processed patterns, if it is determined that the average value of the percentage of the number of defects of different similar processed patterns does not meet the requirement, then it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirement; when the average value of the percentage of the number of defects of different similar processed patterns meets the requirement, the process proceeds to step S213;

[0099] S213 determines the defect abnormality probability of different similar processing patterns based on the defect quantity and the defect quantity ratio of different similar processing patterns. If there is a similar processing pattern whose defect abnormality probability does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirement. If there is no similar processing pattern whose defect abnormality probability does not meet the requirement, the process proceeds to step S214.

[0100] In step S214, similar processing patterns with a defect abnormality probability greater than a preset defect probability threshold are regarded as suspected abnormal patterns. When the proportion of the number of the suspected abnormal patterns in the similar processing patterns is greater than the proportion of the number of preset patterns, it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements. When the proportion of the number of the suspected abnormal patterns in the similar processing patterns is not greater than the proportion of the number of preset patterns, the process proceeds to step S22.

[0101] Optionally, the above step S22 includes the following contents:

[0102] S221 divides the similar processing patterns into different similarity coefficient intervals based on the pattern similarity coefficients between the different similar processing patterns and the embroidery processing pattern; when the number of similar processing patterns within the preset similarity coefficient interval is greater than the preset number of similar patterns, the process proceeds to step S222; when the number of similar processing patterns within the preset similarity coefficient interval is not greater than the preset number of similar patterns, the process proceeds to step S223;

[0103] S222: When the average value of the defect anomaly probabilities of different similar processed patterns within the preset similarity coefficient interval or the proportion of the number of suspected abnormal patterns in the similar processed patterns does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements; when the average value of the defect anomaly probabilities of different similar processed patterns within the preset similarity coefficient interval and the proportion of the number of suspected abnormal patterns in the similar processed patterns both meet the requirements, the process proceeds to step S223;

[0104] S223 determines weight coefficients of different similar processing patterns based on pattern similarity coefficients between different similar processing patterns and the embroidery processing pattern, and uses the product of the weight coefficient and the defect abnormality probability as the corrected abnormality probability. When the proportion of similar processing patterns whose corrected abnormality probability does not meet the requirements in the similar processing patterns is greater than a preset pattern quantity proportion threshold, it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements. When the proportion of similar processing patterns whose corrected abnormality probability does not meet the requirements in the similar processing patterns is not greater than the preset pattern quantity proportion threshold, the process proceeds to step S23.

[0105] S3, using the embroidery processing pattern, determining a movement route of the laser device for cutting processing in different pattern areas, and determining a problem processing area in the pattern area based on historical abnormality data corresponding to the movement route;

[0106] Furthermore, the pattern area is divided according to the area where there is no discontinuity when the laser device performs embroidery processing.

[0107] Specifically, the historical abnormal data corresponding to the moving route includes the number of embroidery defects when the embroidery process is performed using the moving route and the ratio of the number of embroidery defects.

[0108] It should be noted that the method for determining the problem processing area is:

[0109] Determining, based on historical abnormal data corresponding to the moving route, a percentage of embroidery defects when embroidery processing is performed using the moving route;

[0110] Whether the pattern area is a problem processing area is determined according to the proportion of the number of embroidery defects.

[0111] Furthermore, when the proportion of the number of embroidery defects does not meet the requirement, the pattern area is determined to be a problem processing area.

[0112] S4 determines the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in different divided time periods based on the distribution data of the problem processing areas and the processing time ratio in different divided time periods.

[0113] It can be understood that the divided time periods are divided according to preset durations.

[0114] Specifically, such as Figure 5 As shown, the method for determining the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in different divided time periods is:

[0115] Determining the positioning processing time periods of different problem processing areas in the divided time periods based on the distribution data of the problem processing areas in the divided time periods;

[0116] Determining the intervals between different adjacent positioning processing periods according to the positioning processing periods of different problem processing areas in the divided period, and determining the distribution discrete factor of the laser device in the divided period using a preset discrete coefficient mapped from an average value of the intervals;

[0117] Obtain the processing time ratio of the problem processing area in the divided time period, determine the continuous control demand coefficient of the divided time period based on the product of the processing time ratio and the distribution discrete factor, and use the continuous control demand coefficient to determine the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in the divided time period.

[0118] Furthermore, the continuous control requirement coefficient of the laser in the divided time period ranges from 0 to 1, wherein the higher the continuous control requirement coefficient of the laser in the divided time period, the higher the degree of demand for embroidery processing using a fixed control speed in the divided time period.

[0119] It should be noted that the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in the divided time period is determined by using the continuous control requirement coefficient, specifically including:

[0120] When the continuous control demand coefficient is greater than a preset control demand coefficient threshold, embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed using a second preset control speed;

[0121] When the continuous control demand coefficient is not greater than the preset control demand coefficient threshold, the embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed only in the problem processing area at the second preset control speed, and the embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed at the preset control speed in other areas except the problem processing area.

[0122] In another possible embodiment, the method for determining the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in different divided time periods is:

[0123] When it is determined based on the distribution data of the problem processing areas in the divided time periods that no problem processing areas exist in the divided time periods, embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed at a preset control speed;

[0124] When there is a problem processing area in the split period:

[0125] determining positioning processing time periods for different problem processing areas in the divided time periods, obtaining the number of the positioning processing time periods, and performing embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern using a second preset control speed when the number of the positioning processing time periods does not meet the requirement;

[0126] When the number of positioning processing periods meets the requirement:

[0127] Obtaining a processing time ratio of the problem processing area in the divided time period, and when the processing time ratio of the problem processing area in the divided time period is greater than a preset processing time ratio, performing embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern using a second preset control speed;

[0128] When the processing time ratio of the problem processing area in the divided time period is not greater than the preset processing time ratio:

[0129] When the processing time proportion of the problem processing area in the split period is less than the preset time setting value:

[0130] Obtaining intervals between different adjacent positioning processing time periods; when the intervals between different adjacent positioning processing time periods are all less than a preset interval threshold, performing embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern at a second preset control speed only in the problem processing area, and performing embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern at a preset control speed in other areas except the problem processing area;

[0131] When there is a positioning processing period with an interval length not less than the preset interval length threshold or the processing time ratio of the problem processing area in the divided period is not less than the preset time setting value:

[0132] Determining the intervals between different adjacent positioning processing periods according to the positioning processing periods of different problem processing areas in the divided period, and determining the distribution dispersion factor of the laser device in the divided period using a preset dispersion coefficient mapped from an average value of the intervals, and performing embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern using a second preset control speed when the distribution dispersion factor is greater than a preset distribution dispersion factor threshold;

[0133] When the distribution dispersion factor is not greater than the preset distribution dispersion factor threshold:

[0134] Obtain the processing time ratio of the problem processing area in the divided time period, determine the continuous control demand coefficient of the divided time period based on the product of the processing time ratio and the distribution discrete factor, and use the continuous control demand coefficient to determine the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in the divided time period.

[0135] Example 2

[0136] Second, as Figure 6 As shown, the present invention provides a management system for laser cutting conversion control, which adopts the above-mentioned management method for laser cutting conversion control, specifically including:

[0137] Aging condition identification module, reliability assessment module, problem area identification module, control conversion module;

[0138] The aging condition identification module is responsible for determining whether the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements based on the usage data in different control power intervals;

[0139] The reliability evaluation module is responsible for determining whether the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern meets the requirements;

[0140] The problem area identification module is responsible for determining the problem processing area in the pattern area;

[0141] The switching strategy determination module is responsible for determining the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in different divided time periods.

[0142] The various embodiments in this specification are described in a progressive manner. Similar portions between the various embodiments can be referenced to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from the other embodiments. In particular, the device, apparatus, and non-volatile computer storage medium embodiments are generally similar to the method embodiments, so their descriptions are relatively simplified. For relevant details, refer to the descriptions of the method embodiments.

[0143] The foregoing description of this specification describes specific embodiments. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recited in the claims can be performed in an order different from that described in the embodiments and still achieve the desired results. Furthermore, the processes depicted in the accompanying drawings do not necessarily require the specific order shown or the sequential order to achieve the desired results. In certain embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.

[0144] The foregoing description is merely one or more embodiments of this specification and is not intended to limit this specification. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations may be made to one or more embodiments of this specification. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, or improvements made within the spirit and principles of one or more embodiments of this specification are intended to be within the scope of the claims of this specification.

Claims

1. A management method for laser cutting conversion control, characterized in that, Specifically include: Based on the usage data of the laser device of the embroidery machine, determining the usage data of the laser device in different control power intervals, and when it is determined based on the usage data in the different control power intervals that the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements, proceeding to the next step; Based on the analysis result of the embroidery processing pattern, determining similar processing patterns of the laser device within a preset time period, and when it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements based on the embroidery processing results of different similar processing patterns, proceeding to the next step; Using the embroidery processing pattern, determining the movement route of the laser device for cutting processing in different pattern areas, and determining the problem processing area in the pattern area based on the historical abnormality data corresponding to the movement route; Determining a control conversion processing strategy for the laser of the laser device in different divided time periods based on the distribution data of the problem processing areas and the processing time ratios in different divided time periods; Determining that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements specifically includes: Determine the percentage of defects in the embroidery processing results of the different similar processing patterns based on the embroidery processing results of the different similar processing patterns, and use the percentage as the percentage of defects; determining weight coefficients of different similar processing patterns based on pattern similarity coefficients between the different similar processing patterns and the embroidery processing pattern; The pattern defect probability of the embroidery processing pattern is determined by the weight coefficients and defect quantity proportions of different similar processing patterns, and the pattern defect probability is used to determine whether the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern meets the requirements. When the pattern defect probability is greater than the preset defect probability, it is determined that the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern does not meet the requirements.

2. The management method for laser cutting conversion control according to claim 1, characterized in that: The control power interval is divided according to the rated power of the laser device and a preset power interval.

3. The management method for laser cutting conversion control according to claim 1, characterized in that: Determining that the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements, specifically including: Determining the usage time of the laser device in the different control power intervals based on the usage data in the different control power intervals; Determining, based on usage durations of the laser device in different control power intervals, a usage duration in which the control power is greater than a preset control power; Whether the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements is determined according to the usage time period when the control power is greater than the preset control power.

4. The management method for laser cutting conversion control according to claim 3, characterized in that: When the control power of the laser device is greater than the preset control power and the usage time is greater than the preset usage time, it is determined that the aging condition of the laser device does not meet the requirements.

5. The management method for laser cutting conversion control according to claim 1, characterized in that: When the aging condition of the laser device does not meet the requirement, the embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed based on a preset control speed.

6. The management method for laser cutting conversion control according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method for determining the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in different divided time periods is: Determining the positioning processing time periods of different problem processing areas in the divided time periods based on the distribution data of the problem processing areas in the divided time periods; Determining the intervals between different adjacent positioning processing periods according to the positioning processing periods of different problem processing areas in the divided period, and determining the distribution discrete factor of the laser device in the divided period using a preset discrete coefficient mapped from an average value of the intervals; Obtain the processing time ratio of the problem processing area in the divided time period, determine the continuous control demand coefficient of the divided time period based on the product of the processing time ratio and the distribution discrete factor, and use the continuous control demand coefficient to determine the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in the divided time period.

7. The management method for laser cutting conversion control according to claim 6, characterized in that: Determining a control conversion processing strategy for the laser of the laser device in the divided time period using the continuous control requirement coefficient specifically includes: When the continuous control demand coefficient is greater than a preset control demand coefficient threshold, embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed using a second preset control speed; When the continuous control demand coefficient is not greater than the preset control demand coefficient threshold, the embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed only in the problem processing area at the second preset control speed, and the embroidery processing of the embroidery processing pattern is performed at the preset control speed in other areas except the problem processing area.

8. A management system for laser cutting conversion control, adopting a management method for laser cutting conversion control according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that: Specifically include: Aging condition identification module, reliability assessment module, problem area identification module, control conversion module; The aging condition identification module is responsible for determining whether the aging condition of the laser device meets the requirements based on the usage data in different control power intervals; The reliability evaluation module is responsible for determining whether the embroidery processing reliability of the embroidery processing pattern meets the requirements; The problem area identification module is responsible for determining the problem processing area in the pattern area; The control conversion module is responsible for determining the control conversion processing strategy of the laser of the laser device in different divided time periods.

Images