Multifunctional tipping paper and preparation method thereof

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of tipping paper preparation, in particular to multifunctional tipping paper and a preparation method thereof.The multifunctional tipping paper is prepared from the following raw materials: a composite base material, a composite coating and reinforcing slurry. Through the triple design of nano-carrier-micromolecule synergy-interface bonding, the antagonism effect of a traditional functional additive is broken through; if the flame retardant often reduces the antibacterial activity, the flame retardant in the scheme can improve the antibacterial activity; through process integration breakthrough, biological fermentation (bacterial cellulose) and papermaking mechanical treatment (fine fiber screening) are subjected to trans-boundary fusion, so that the large-scale application cost of nano materials is reduced; the finally prepared product derives a transboundary value (ecological degradation and production safety) from basic functions (antibacterial and flame-retardant), exceeds the traditional function definition of a cigarette packaging material, provides technical migration possibility for the fields of medical treatment and environmental protection, and has a wide application prospect.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention relates to the technical field of tipping paper preparation, in particular to multifunctional tipping paper and a preparation method thereof. Background Art

[0002] Cigarette tipping paper, also known as tipping paper, is the outer wrapping paper for cigarette filters. Resembling the outer bark of a cedar plant, it's called tipping paper. As the outer wrapping material for cigarette filters, tipping paper comes into direct contact with the human body, and its functionality and safety have always been a focus of industry attention. Existing technologies often focus on optimizing the performance of tipping paper for a single function, making it difficult to meet multiple requirements. This is primarily due to the following technical bottlenecks: 1. The contradiction between single function and actual needs: 1. Limitations of antibacterial properties: Traditional antimicrobial tipping paper often uses a single antimicrobial agent, such as ε-polylysine, but this agent has a narrow antimicrobial spectrum and is prone to migration and loss. For example, tipping paper that relies solely on ε-polylysine is susceptible to antimicrobial agent precipitation in humid environments, failing to effectively inhibit the growth of various microorganisms, such as fungi and Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, existing technologies lack effective methods for integrating the antimicrobial agent into the paper matrix, resulting in insufficient antimicrobial durability.

[0003] 2. Lack of flame retardant properties and safety hazards: Most tipping papers lack flame-retardant design, leaving unextinguished cigarette butts discarded by smokers a potential fire hazard. Existing flame-retardant technologies often utilize coatings, but single flame retardants can easily compromise paper's flexibility and struggle to balance antimicrobial properties. For example, when traditional phosphorus-containing flame retardants are used alone, the limiting oxygen index of tipping paper is low, failing to meet fire safety requirements and potentially reducing the paper's tensile strength.

[0004] 2. Imbalance between mechanical properties and added functions: Tipping paper needs to possess a certain strength to withstand the strain of the winding process and use, and functional additives often degrade mechanical properties. For example, the addition of antimicrobial agents (such as ε-polylysine) can disrupt hydrogen bonds between paper fibers, reducing tensile strength. Excessive use of flame-retardant coatings can reduce the paper's folding resistance, impacting its processing adaptability.

[0005] 3. Complexity of the preparation process and environmental challenges: 1. Limitations of the preparation of antibacterial tipping paper: The existing technology proposes to use Gluconacetobacter ZT-01 to ferment and prepare bacterial cellulose. Although this can improve antibacterial properties and strength, its culture cycle is as long as 7-14 days, and the bacterial cellulose membrane needs to be treated with strong alkali. The process is time-consuming and energy-intensive, making it difficult to scale up production.

[0006] 2. Compatibility issues of flame-retardant coatings: Traditional flame-retardant monomers require multi-step organic synthesis with harsh reaction conditions. In addition, traditional combustion aids are prone to chemical reactions when compounded with antibacterial agents, resulting in decreased coating stability. For example, silicone oil antibacterial agents have poor compatibility with phosphorus-containing flame-retardant monomers and are prone to phase separation.

[0007] In short, the existing tipping paper technology fails to achieve the coordinated optimization of "antibacterial-flame retardant-strength". The core reasons are: 1. The functional modules are designed independently, and no synergy is formed between the materials. For example, the action mechanisms of antimicrobial agents and flame retardants interfere with each other; 2. Lack of interface control between paper substrate and coating, resulting in a contradiction between functional addition and mechanical properties; 3. The preparation process does not take into account efficiency, cost and environmental protection.

[0008] Therefore, developing a multifunctional tipping paper that is highly effective in antibacterial, flame retardant, and high-strength and has a feasible preparation process has become a technical problem that needs to be urgently solved in this field. Summary of the Invention

[0009] In view of this, the purpose of the present invention is to propose a multifunctional tipping paper and a preparation method thereof, which achieves synergistic properties of antibacterial, flame retardant and high strength through innovative material composite and process design, thus filling the gap in the existing technology.

[0010] Based on the above objectives, the present invention provides a multifunctional tipping paper and a preparation method thereof.

[0011] A multifunctional tipping paper is prepared from the following raw materials by weight: 20-30 parts of a composite substrate, 10-15 parts of a composite coating, and 55-70 parts of a reinforcing slurry; The composite substrate is a bacterial cellulose-ε-polylysine composite substrate, and the bacterial cellulose is prepared by fermentation of Gluconacetobacter ZT-01; The hydroxyl groups of bacterial cellulose and the amino groups of ε-polylysine are cross-linked through carbodiimide to form covalent bonds, thereby preventing the migration of antimicrobial agents. Glycine synergistically enhances the antibacterial activity of ε-polylysine and reduces bacterial resistance. The bacterial cellulose-ε-polylysine composite substrate can form a three-dimensional nanofiber network with an increased specific surface area. After loading ε-polylysine, the diameter of the inhibition zone increases, and the inhibition rate against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus is high.

[0012] The composite coating comprises a water-based acrylic emulsion, a silicone oil antibacterial agent and a flame retardant monomer; The PN bond in the flame retardant monomer forms an expanded carbon layer during combustion, blocking heat and oxygen. The guanidine group in the silicone oil antibacterial agent destroys the bacterial cell membrane, forming a dual antibacterial mechanism with the antibacterial system of the composite substrate.

[0013] The flame retardant monomer is a maleimide derivative containing a phosphorus-nitrogen synergistic structure; The reinforcing slurry is a plant fine fiber reinforcing slurry; The plant fine fibers are fine components obtained by screening, purifying and beating wood pulp or hemp pulp.

[0014] Preferably, the average fiber length of the plant fine fibers is ≤0.5 mm, and the fine fiber content is ≥60%.

[0015] The small fibers fill the gaps between long fibers to form a hydrogen bond network, and the pulping treatment increases the fiber specific surface area and enhances the bonding strength with the composite substrate.

[0016] A method for preparing multifunctional tipping paper comprises the following steps: Step S1. Preparation of raw material slurry; Step S2. Preparation of a composite substrate; Step S3. Preparation of composite coating; Step S4. papermaking; Step S5: coating.

[0017] Preferably, the preparation process of the raw material slurry in step S1 is as follows: Step S101. Bleached wood pulp or hemp pulp is selected as raw material, and a deflaking machine is used to disperse the fibers. The deflaking concentration is 3%-5%, and the deflaking time is 15-20 minutes. Step S102. Use a pressure screen to screen the product with a width of 0.15-0.2 mm to remove coarse fibers and impurities; Step S103: Use a disc grinder to perform beating treatment, with a beating concentration of 4%-6%, a disc grinding gap of 0.1-0.3mm, and a beating degree controlled at 30-45°SR to obtain a raw material slurry with a fine fiber content of ≥60%.

[0018] The pressure screen with a sieve gap of 0.15-0.2 mm in step S1 can remove coarse fiber bundles, and the disc grinding and beating (30-45° SR) promotes fiber separation and improves the water retention value and interweaving ability of the pulp.

[0019] Preferably, the preparation process of the composite substrate in step S2 is as follows: Step S201. Preparation of bacterial cellulose pulp; Step S202: Introducing a composite coating to obtain a composite substrate.

[0020] Preferably, the preparation process of the bacterial cellulose pulp in step S201 is as follows: Step S2011. Prepare an aqueous solution containing 20 g / L glucose, 3 g / L peptone, 5 g / L yeast extract, and 1 g / L citric acid monohydrate, sterilize at 121°C for 15 min, and adjust the pH to 4.8-5.0; Step S2012: inoculating activated Gluconobacter ZT-01 and culturing at 25-30°C for 7-14 days to form a bacterial cellulose film; Step S2013: The bacterial cellulose membrane is swollen with a 0.5 mol / L sodium hydroxide solution for 2 hours, washed until neutral, and pulped to obtain a bacterial cellulose pulp with a concentration of 3%-10%.

[0021] Preferably, the process of introducing the composite coating in step S202 is as follows: 0.1%-2% ε-polylysine, 0.5%-2% glycine and 0.5%-1.5% carbodiimide crosslinking agent were added to the bacterial cellulose pulp, shaken at 25-30° C. for 3-5 hours, and filtered to obtain a composite substrate.

[0022] The nanofiber structure of bacterial cellulose in step S2 provides a high-load carrier for the antimicrobial agent, and the cross-linking reaction ensures the long-term retention of the antimicrobial agent.

[0023] Preferably, the preparation process of the composite coating in step S3 is as follows: Step S301. Prepare an aqueous acrylic emulsion: Mix 10-25 parts of butyl acrylate, 20-40 parts of methyl methacrylate, 5-10 parts of acrylic acid, and 1-3 parts of a flame retardant monomer, emulsify with an aqueous solution of sodium lauryl sulfate, initiate polymerization with ammonium persulfate, and react at 70-80°C for 2-6 hours to obtain an emulsion; Step S302. Preparation of silicone oil antibacterial agent: epoxy silicone oil and tetramethylguanidine are mixed in a mass ratio of 1:0.5-1, and reacted at 50-60°C for 4-12h to obtain a silicone oil antibacterial agent containing guanidine groups; Step S303: Mix the emulsion, silicone oil antibacterial agent, 0.2-0.5 parts of talcum powder, 0.5-1 parts of iron oxide yellow powder, 20-40 parts of food-grade ethanol, and 10-30 parts of pure water to prepare a composite coating.

[0024] In step S3, the flame retardant monomer participates in emulsion polymerization to form a covalently bonded flame retardant network, and the silicon-oxygen chain segments of the silicone oil antibacterial agent enhance the flexibility of the coating and avoid embrittlement caused by the addition of the flame retardant.

[0025] Preferably, the papermaking process in step S4 is as follows: Step S401. The composite substrate is added to the raw material slurry at 2%-10% by dry weight, and 0.5%-1% of a polyacrylamide enhancer and 0.2%-0.5% of a stearic acid lubricant are added; Step S402: Paper is made by a Fourdrinier papermaking machine with a web concentration of 0.8%-1.2%, a machine speed of 200-300 m / min, and a drying temperature of 100-120° C. to obtain a matrix.

[0026] Preferably, the coating process in step S5 is as follows: Step S501: Use comma blade coating method to coat the base paper on one side or both sides, with a coating amount of 5-10g / m 2 ; Step S502: After coating, the paper is dried at 100-120° C. for 5-10 minutes to obtain multifunctional tipping paper.

[0027] The polyacrylamide reinforcing agent in steps S4 and S5 promotes the bridging of the fiber and the substrate, the stearic acid lubricant reduces the friction resistance during the papermaking process, and the comma blade coating achieves precise control of the coating thickness to ensure functional uniformity.

[0028] The comma blade coating combined with 120°C drying allows the coating to form a nano-scale concave-convex structure on the surface of the base paper. The concave-convex structure increases the mechanical interlocking force between the coating and the cigarette holder, reducing the loss rate after friction. In addition, the cross-linking degree between the flame retardant monomer and the emulsion is increased during the drying process, thereby improving the washing resistance of the flame retardant.

[0029] The present invention uses an antibacterial-flame retardant-strength synergistic matrix, a bacterial cellulose substrate to provide mechanical support, an ε-polylysine-glycine system to be antibacterial, a phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardant monomer to inhibit combustion, and fine fiber reinforced slurry to fill pores to form a structure-function integrated system: wherein the bacterial cellulose is loaded with ε-polylysine and glycine, and a covalent bond is formed by cross-linking with carbodiimide. The glycine therein synergistically acts with the amino group of ε-polylysine through hydrogen bonds, thereby enhancing the binding force between the antibacterial agent and the bacterial cell membrane, increasing the diameter of the inhibition zone, and the nanofiber network of the bacterial cellulose forms an antibacterial sustained-release chamber. In a humid environment, the loss rate of the antibacterial agent is reduced. In addition, the bacterial cellulose nanofibers and fine fibers are interwoven into a three-dimensional network, and the nanofibers fill the micropores between the fine fibers, making the paper tensile strength. The index is improved, exceeding the sum of the strengths of the two fibers added separately. The dense network structure reduces the permeability of the coating, reduces the migration of flame retardants and antibacterial agents into the interior of the paper, and increases the density of surface functional groups. In addition, the expanded carbon layer formed when the flame retardant monomer burns can block the oxidation of the silicone oil antibacterial agent by oxygen, thereby improving the retention rate of antibacterial activity at high temperatures. The silicon-oxygen chain segments of the silicone oil antibacterial agent fill the pores of the carbon layer, thereby increasing the density of the carbon layer and improving the flame retardant limiting oxygen index. The acrylic emulsion in the coating forms hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl groups of the substrate fiber, and the amino groups of the silicone oil antibacterial agent react with the carboxyl groups of the bacterial cellulose to enhance the interfacial binding energy and the adhesion of the coating. The interfacial chemical bonding inhibits the generation of microcracks in the coating during the winding process, and the folding endurance is improved, exceeding the theoretical value of the optimization of the coating and base paper alone.

[0030] In actual use, when cigarette butts come into contact with tipping paper, the antibacterial agent inhibits the combustible gases (such as formaldehyde) produced by tobacco mildew, reducing the release of harmful substances in the smoke. In addition, the charcoal layer formed by the paper during combustion remains intact due to its high-strength structure, preventing debris from falling and causing secondary combustion. The safety is improved compared to traditional tipping paper.

[0031] The present invention avoids the environmental pollution of traditional solvent-based coatings through a green preparation process. After optimization of the strong alkali treatment process for bacterial cellulose, the waste liquid can be recycled, reducing wastewater discharge. The water-based coating does not contain VOCs. The energy consumption of producing bacterial cellulose by fermentation is 30% lower than that of chemical synthesis, meeting food contact standards. Moreover, when waste paper degrades in the soil, the residual ε-polylysine can act as a plant growth regulator to promote root growth. Conventional antimicrobial agents are mostly chemically synthesized and do not have this ecological benefit. The low volatility of water-based coatings reduces formaldehyde concentration in the production workshop while increasing the solid content of the coating, achieving a dual optimization of "environmental protection and efficiency."

[0032] Beneficial effects of the present invention: The present invention provides a multifunctional tipping paper and a preparation method thereof. The present invention achieves a breakthrough in material design: through the triple design of "nanocarrier-small molecule synergy-interfacial bonding", it overcomes the antagonistic effect of traditional functional additives. For example, flame retardants often reduce antibacterial activity, while the flame retardants in this solution can enhance antibacterial activity. This invention achieves a breakthrough through process integration: it integrates biological fermentation (bacterial cellulose) with papermaking mechanical processing (fine fiber screening), thereby reducing the cost of large-scale application of nanomaterials. The invention has a breakthrough in functional derivatives: the basic functions (antibacterial and flame retardant) are derived into cross-border values (ecological degradation and production safety), which go beyond the traditional functional definition of cigarette packaging materials, provide the possibility of technology migration in the medical and environmental protection fields, and have broad application prospects. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0033] In order to make the objectives, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more clearly understood, the present invention is further described in detail below with reference to specific embodiments.

[0034] The deposit number of the Gluconacetobacter sp. ZT01 used in the present invention is CGMCC NO.21544.

[0035] Example 1: A method for preparing multifunctional tipping paper, comprising the following steps: S1. Use bleached wood pulp or hemp pulp as raw material and use a deflaking machine to disperse the fibers at a deflaking concentration of 3% for 15 minutes. S2. Use a pressure screen to screen with a screening width of 0.15-0.2mm to remove coarse fibers and impurities; S3. Use a disc grinder for beating treatment with a beating concentration of 4%, a disc grinding gap of 0.1-0.3 mm, and a beating degree controlled at 30°SR to obtain a raw material slurry with a fine fiber content of ≥60%.

[0036] S4. Preparation of bacterial cellulose pulp: An aqueous solution containing 20 g / L glucose, 3 g / L peptone, 5 g / L yeast extract, and 1 g / L citric acid monohydrate was prepared and sterilized at 121°C for 15 min. The pH was adjusted to 4.8-5.0. Activated Gluconobacter ZT-01 was inoculated and cultured at 25°C for 7 days to form a bacterial cellulose membrane. The membrane was swollen with 0.5 mol / L sodium hydroxide solution for 2 h, washed until neutral, and beaten to obtain a 3% bacterial cellulose pulp. S5. Add 0.1% ε-polylysine, 0.5% glycine, and 0.5% carbodiimide crosslinker to the bacterial cellulose pulp, shake and react at 25°C for 3 h, and filter to obtain a composite substrate; S6. Preparation of an aqueous acrylic emulsion: 10 parts of butyl acrylate, 20 parts of methyl methacrylate, 5 parts of acrylic acid, and 1 part of a flame retardant monomer were mixed and emulsified with an aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate, and polymerization was initiated by ammonium persulfate. The reaction was carried out at 70 ° C for 2h to obtain a mixed emulsion; S7. Preparation of silicone oil antimicrobial agent: epoxy silicone oil and tetramethylguanidine were mixed in a mass ratio of 1:0.5 and reacted at 50 ° C for 4 h to obtain a guanidine-containing silicone oil antimicrobial agent; S8. The mixed emulsion, silicone antibacterial agent, 0.2 parts of talc, 0.5 parts of yellow iron oxide powder, 20 parts of food-grade ethanol, 10 parts of pure water were mixed to prepare a composite coating; S9. The composite substrate was added to the raw material slurry at 2% dry weight, and 0.5% polyacrylamide enhancer and 0.2% stearic acid lubricant were added; S10. The substrate was prepared by papermaking on a Fourdrinier paper machine with a web concentration of 0.8%, a machine speed of 200 m / min, and a drying temperature of 100°C.

[0037] S11. Use comma blade coating method to coat the base paper on one or both sides with a coating amount of 5g / m 2 ; S12. After coating, the paper was dried at 100°C for 5 minutes to obtain a multifunctional tipping paper.

[0038] Example 2: A method for preparing multifunctional tipping paper, comprising the following steps: S1. Use bleached wood pulp or hemp pulp as raw material and use a deflaking machine to disperse the fibers at a deflaking concentration of 4% and a deflaking time of 18 minutes. S2. Use a pressure screen to screen with a screening width of 0.15-0.2mm to remove coarse fibers and impurities; S3. Use a disc grinder for beating treatment with a beating concentration of 5%, a disc grinding gap of 0.1-0.3 mm, and a beating degree controlled at 40°SR to obtain a raw material slurry with a fine fiber content of ≥60%.

[0039] S4. Preparation of bacterial cellulose pulp: An aqueous solution containing 20 g / L glucose, 3 g / L peptone, 5 g / L yeast extract, and 1 g / L citric acid monohydrate was prepared and sterilized at 121°C for 15 min. The pH was adjusted to 4.8-5.0. Activated Gluconobacter ZT-01 was inoculated and cultured at 28°C for 10 days to form a bacterial cellulose membrane. The membrane was swollen with 0.5 mol / L sodium hydroxide solution for 2 h, washed until neutral, and beaten to obtain a bacterial cellulose pulp with a concentration of 7%. S5. Add 1% ε-polylysine, 0.5%-1%-2% glycine, and 1% carbodiimide crosslinker to the bacterial cellulose slurry, shake and react at 28°C for 4 hours, and filter to obtain a composite substrate; S6. Preparation of an aqueous acrylic emulsion: 20 parts of butyl acrylate, 30 parts of methyl methacrylate, 8 parts of acrylic acid, and 2 parts of a flame retardant monomer were mixed and emulsified with an aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate, and polymerization was initiated by ammonium persulfate. The reaction was carried out at 75 ° C for 4h to obtain a mixed emulsion; S7. Preparation of silicone oil antimicrobial agent: epoxy silicone oil and tetramethylguanidine were mixed in a mass ratio of 1:0.7 and reacted at 55 ° C for 8 h to obtain a guanidine-containing silicone oil antimicrobial agent; S8. The mixed emulsion, silicone antibacterial agent, 0.4 parts of talc, 0.8 parts of yellow iron oxide powder, 30 parts of food-grade ethanol, 20 parts of pure water were mixed to prepare a composite coating; S9. The composite substrate was added to the raw material slurry at 6% dry weight, and 0.8% polyacrylamide enhancer and 0.4% stearic acid lubricant were added; S10. The substrate was prepared by papermaking on a Fourdrinier paper machine at a web concentration of 1%, a machine speed of 250 m / min, and a drying temperature of 110°C.

[0040] S11. Coat one or both sides of the base paper using a comma blade coating method with a coating weight of 7.5g / m 2 ; S12. After coating, the paper was dried at 110°C for 8 minutes to obtain a multifunctional tipping paper.

[0041] Example 3: A method for preparing multifunctional tipping paper, comprising the following steps: S1. Use bleached wood pulp or hemp pulp as raw material and use a deflaking machine to disperse the fibers at a deflaking concentration of 5% for 20 minutes. S2. Use a pressure screen to screen with a screening width of 0.15-0.2mm to remove coarse fibers and impurities; S3. Use a disc grinder for beating treatment with a beating concentration of 6%, a disc grinding gap of 0.1-0.3 mm, and a beating degree controlled at 45°SR to obtain a raw material slurry with a fine fiber content of ≥60%.

[0042] S4. Preparation of bacterial cellulose pulp: An aqueous solution containing 20 g / L glucose, 3 g / L peptone, 5 g / L yeast extract, and 1 g / L citric acid monohydrate was prepared and sterilized at 121°C for 15 min. The pH was adjusted to 4.8-5.0. Activated Gluconobacter ZT-01 was inoculated and cultured at 30°C for 14 days to form a bacterial cellulose membrane. The membrane was swollen with 0.5 mol / L sodium hydroxide solution for 2 h, washed until neutral, and beaten to obtain a bacterial cellulose pulp with a concentration of 10%. S5. Add 2% ε-polylysine, 2% glycine, and 1.5% carbodiimide crosslinker to the bacterial cellulose pulp, shake and react at 30°C for 5 h, and filter to obtain a composite substrate; S6. Preparation of an aqueous acrylic emulsion: 25 parts of butyl acrylate, 40 parts of methyl methacrylate, 10 parts of acrylic acid, and 3 parts of a flame retardant monomer were mixed and emulsified with an aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate, and polymerization was initiated by ammonium persulfate. The reaction was carried out at 80 ° C for 6h to obtain a mixed emulsion; S7. Preparation of silicone oil antimicrobial agent: epoxy silicone oil and tetramethylguanidine were mixed in a mass ratio of 1:1 and reacted at 60°C for 12 hours to obtain a guanidine-containing silicone oil antimicrobial agent; S8. The mixed emulsion, silicone antibacterial agent, 0.5 parts of talc, 1 part of yellow iron oxide powder, 40 parts of food-grade ethanol and 30 parts of pure water were mixed to obtain a composite coating; S9. The composite substrate was added to the raw material slurry at 10% by dry weight, and 1% polyacrylamide reinforcing agent and 0.5% stearic acid lubricant were added; S10. The substrate was prepared by papermaking on a Fourdrinier paper machine with a web concentration of 1.2%, a machine speed of 300 m / min, and a drying temperature of 120°C.

[0043] S11. Use comma blade coating method to coat the base paper on one or both sides with a coating amount of 10g / m 2 ; S12. After coating, the paper was dried at 120°C for 10 minutes to obtain a multifunctional tipping paper.

[0044] Comparative Example 1: Absence of bacterial cellulose substrate (using only ε-polylysine) Difference from Example 1: Only ε-polylysine (without bacterial cellulose) was added and directly incorporated into the raw material slurry. The remaining steps were the same as Example 1.

[0045] Comparative Example 2: Replacing the flame retardant monomer with a traditional phosphorus-containing flame retardant (without PN synergistic structure) Difference from Example 2: Tritolyl phosphate was used to replace the phosphorus-nitrogen maleimide derivative, and the remaining steps were the same as Example 2.

[0046] Comparative Example 3: No fine fiber screening (high crude fiber content) Difference from Example 3: Omit the pressure screen screening (directly use the unscreened slurry), and the remaining steps are the same as Example 3.

[0047] Comparative Example 4: Using solvent-based coating (non-aqueous system) Differences from Example 2: In step S3, toluene is used as the solvent to prepare the coating (replacing the aqueous acrylic emulsion), and the remaining steps are the same as Example 2.

[0048] Comparative Example 5: Omitting the carbodiimide crosslinker (no covalent bonding) Differences from Example 1: In step S2, carbodiimide was not added, and only ε-polylysine and bacterial cellulose were physically mixed. The remaining steps were the same as Example 1.

[0049] Comparative Example 6: Replacing plant fine fibers with ordinary long fiber pulp Difference from Example 3: Unbeaten long fiber pulp (fine fiber content <30%) is used in step S1, and the remaining steps are the same as Example 3.

[0050] Performance test: The following performance tests were performed on the samples prepared in Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Examples 1 to 6: 1. Test items and methods Antibacterial performance test: Methods: Referring to GB / T 20944.3-2008, the inhibition zone method was used. The test objects were Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923). The inoculation concentration was 105 CFU / mL. The samples were placed in culture for 24 hours and the inhibition zone diameter was measured.

[0051] Equipment: biochemical incubator (model SPX-250B), sterile operating table.

[0052] Flame retardant performance test: Method: Limiting Oxygen Index (LOI) test, refer to GB / T2406.2-2009, sample size 100mm×6mm×3mm, record the minimum oxygen volume fraction required to maintain combustion.

[0053] Equipment: Limiting oxygen index tester (model JF-3).

[0054] Mechanical properties test: Tensile index: refer to GB / T 12914-2018, sample size 15 mm × 250 mm, tensile speed 100 mm / min.

[0055] Burst index: Refer to GB / T 454-2002, using hydraulic burst tester.

[0056] Folding endurance: Refer to GB / T 2679.5-1995, the number of times a piece of paper can be folded back and forth until it breaks.

[0057] Equipment: Tensile Strength Tester (Model L&W CE062), Burst Strength Tester (Model L&WCE180).

[0058] Coating adhesion test: Method: Cross-hatch method, referring to GB / T 9286-1998, uses a 1mm spacing cutter to cross-hatch, then adheres 3M tape and pulls it off to assess the degree of shedding (0 is the best).

[0059] Environmental testing: VOCs emissions: Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to test the volatile organic compound content of the coating after drying, referring to HJ 583-2010; The results are shown in Tables 1 to 3 below: 3. Data Analysis Antibacterial performance analysis: Advantages of the examples: The diameters of the inhibition zones of Examples 1-3 are all >22 mm, which are significantly better than those of Comparative Example 1 (12-13 mm), demonstrating the synergistic antibacterial effect of the bacterial cellulose-ε-polylysine covalent cross-linking system (glycine enhances the binding force between ε-polylysine and bacterial membranes, and the bacterial cellulose nanonetwork serves as a sustained-release carrier).

[0060] Comparative Examples Defects: Comparative Example 1 lacks bacterial cellulose, and ε-polylysine is easy to migrate and lose; Comparative Example 5 has no cross-linking agent, and the antibacterial agent is easily physically adsorbed and falls off, and the inhibition zone is reduced by 29.0% compared with Example 1.

[0061] Flame retardant performance analysis: Advantages of the embodiment: The LOI of Example 3 reaches 34.1%, because the phosphorus-nitrogen flame retardant monomer forms an expanded carbon layer (PN bonds synergistically form carbon), and the silicon-oxygen chain segments of the silicone oil antibacterial agent fill the pores of the carbon layer, and the density is increased by 40%.

[0062] Comparative Example Defects: After Comparative Example 2 was replaced with a traditional phosphorus-containing flame retardant, the LOI dropped to 26.8%. Due to the lack of nitrogen synergy, the carbon layer was easily broken. Comparative Example 3 did not screen fine fibers, the pores between fibers were large, and the flame retardant penetration was uneven, and the LOI was reduced by 15.8% compared with Example 2.

[0063] Mechanical properties analysis: Trends in Examples: The tensile index of Examples 1-3 increased from 18.3 N·m / g to 22.1 N·m / g with increasing composite substrate content (2%-10%). This is because bacterial cellulose nanofibers (diameter 20-100 nm) and fine fibers (aspect ratio ≥ 40) formed an interwoven network, which increased the number of hydrogen bonding points.

[0064] Impact of comparative examples: After comparative example 6 was replaced with long fiber slurry, the tensile index dropped to 14.9 N·m / g. Due to the lack of fine fiber filling, the bonding strength between fibers was insufficient. Comparative example 4 used solvent-based coating, and the interface bonding between the coating and the substrate was weak. The folding endurance was only 95 times, which was 52.5% lower than that of Example 1.

[0065] Environmental protection and process adaptability analysis: Advantages of the examples: All examples use water-based paints, and VOCs are not detected, which meets the food contact standards; Comparative Example 4 has a solvent-based paint with VOCs of 158.3 mg / m², which exceeds the national standard (≤50 mg / m²).

[0066] Coating adhesion: The coatings of the examples form hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl groups of the substrate through the acrylic emulsion, and the adhesion is all level 0. However, due to the poor compatibility of the flame retardant monomer, the adhesion of comparative example 2 is reduced to level 2, and it is easy to fall off by scratching.

[0067] The reasons for the above data are as follows: 1. Synergistic effect at the material composition level: 1. Antimicrobial synergy of bacterial cellulose, ε-polylysine, and glycine: Technical approach: ε-polylysine and glycine are loaded onto bacterial cellulose (specific surface area 3425 m² / g) and covalently bonded via carbodiimide crosslinking. Unexpected effect: Glycine hydrogen bonds synergistically with the amino groups of ε-polylysine, tripling the binding of the antimicrobial agent to bacterial cell membranes and increasing the diameter of the inhibition zone from 15 mm to 22 mm (compared to 12-15 mm for conventional single ε-polylysine). The bacterial cellulose nanofiber network forms an "antimicrobial sustained-release chamber," reducing antimicrobial loss by 60% in humid environments (humidity ≥80%), compared to over 40% loss within 24 hours for conventional coatings.

[0068] 2. Coating Synergy of Phosphorus-Nitrogen Flame Retardant Monomer and Silicone Antimicrobial Agent: Technical Approach: A maleimide derivative containing a PN bond is compounded with a guanidine-containing silicone antimicrobial agent in an acrylic emulsion. Unexpected Effect: The expanded char layer (10-15μm thick) formed during combustion of the flame retardant monomer blocks oxygen oxidation of the silicone antimicrobial agent, increasing the antimicrobial activity retention at high temperatures (200°C) from 30% to 75%. The silicon-oxygen segments of the silicone antimicrobial agent fill the pores of the char layer, increasing its density by 40% and boosting the flame retardant Limiting Oxygen Index (LOI) from 28% to 32% (exceeding the theoretical sum of 29-30% for a combination of PN monomer and silicone oil alone).

[0069] 2. Synergistic Effects at the Microstructural Level: 1. Synergistic Enhancement of Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibers and Plant Fine Fibers: Technical Method: Bacterial cellulose nanofibers (20-100 nm in diameter) and fine fibers (aspect ratio ≥ 40) are interwoven into a three-dimensional network. Unexpected Effect: The nanofibers fill the micropores between the fine fibers (pore diameter reduced from 5-10 μm to 1-2 μm), increasing the paper's tensile index from 12 N·m / g to 18.3 N·m / g, exceeding the combined strength of the two fibers added individually (15 N·m / g). The dense network structure reduces coating permeability by 50%, minimizes the migration of flame retardants and antimicrobial agents into the paper, and increases the surface functional group density (antimicrobial group density increases from 0.8 mmol / g to 1.5 mmol / g).

[0070] 2. Interfacial synergy between the composite coating and the base paper: Technical approach: The acrylic emulsion in the coating forms hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl groups of the base paper fibers, while the amino groups of the silicone antimicrobial agent undergo a coupling reaction with the carboxyl groups of the bacterial cellulose. Unexpected results: The interfacial binding energy increased from 20mJ / m² to 45mJ / m², and the coating adhesion test (cross-hatch method) improved from level 2 to level 0. Conventional coatings rely solely on physical adsorption for interfacial bonding with base paper (adhesion levels 3-4). This interfacial chemical bonding suppressed microcracking in the coating during the splicing process, increasing the folding endurance from 50 to 200 times, exceeding the theoretical value of 120 times when the coating and base paper are optimized separately.

[0071] 3. Synergistic effect at the preparation process level: 1. Cost synergy between fine raw material processing and fermentation technology: Technical means: Pressure screen screening (0.15mm screen gap) and disc refiner beating (30-45° SR) increase the fine fiber content to 60%. Meanwhile, the bacterial cellulose fermentation broth is recycled (utilization rate 80%). Unexpected results: The fiber recycling rate of the fine fiber slurry is increased by 30%, reducing raw material costs by 15%. The fermentation broth recycling reduces glucose consumption by 30%, resulting in a 22% reduction in overall production costs compared to traditional processes (conventional single process optimization only reduces costs by 8-10%).

[0072] 2. Synergy between coating process and functional durability: Technical means: Comma blade coating (accuracy ±0.5g / m²) combined with 120°C drying creates a nano-scale concave-convex structure (roughness Ra 0.2-0.3μm) on the base paper surface. Unexpected effect: The concave-convex structure enhances the mechanical fit between the coating and the cigarette holder, reducing coating loss from 25% to 5% after 100 rubbing cycles, compared to 15% after 50 rubbing cycles with conventional blade coating. The drying process increases the crosslinking degree between the flame retardant monomer and the emulsion from 60% to 85%, increasing the flame retardant's resistance to washing (simulated saliva immersion) from 3 to 10 times, exceeding the expected effect of 5-6 times after process parameter optimization.

[0073] 4. Cross-border collaboration at the functional performance level: 1. Safe synergy of antimicrobial, flame retardant, and strength: Technical measures: The antimicrobial system inhibits microbial metabolic heat production (reducing the temperature by 10-15°C), the flame retardant system slows combustion (from 20 mm / min to 8 mm / min), and the high-strength structure prevents fragmentation during combustion. An unexpected effect: When cigarette butts come into contact with tipping paper, the antimicrobial agent inhibits combustible gases (such as formaldehyde) produced by tobacco mold, reducing the release of harmful substances in the smoke by 18%. Flame retardant or antimicrobial properties alone do not achieve this effect. The high-strength structure maintains the integrity of the char layer formed during combustion, preventing debris from falling and causing secondary combustion, resulting in a 30% improvement in safety compared to traditional tipping paper.

[0074] 2. Sustainable synergy between environmental performance and functionality: Technical approach: Combining the biodegradability of bacterial cellulose (90% degradation rate / 60 days) with the VOC-free nature of water-based paint. An unexpected benefit: When waste paper degrades in soil, the residual ε-polylysine acts as a plant growth regulator (promoting root growth by 15%). Conventional antimicrobial agents, which are mostly chemically synthesized, lack this ecological benefit. The low volatility of water-based paint reduces formaldehyde concentration in the production workshop from 0.5mg / m³ to 0.1mg / m³ (national standard 0.12mg / m³), while simultaneously increasing the paint's solids content by 10%, achieving dual optimization of "environmental protection and efficiency."

[0075] 5. Theoretical breakthrough points of synergistic effect: 1. Material design breakthrough: Through the triple design of "nanocarrier-small molecule synergy-interfacial bonding", it breaks through the antagonistic effect of traditional functional additives (for example, flame retardants often reduce antibacterial activity by 10-20%, while this solution increases it by 15%).

[0076] 2. Process integration breakthrough: The cross-border integration of biological fermentation (bacterial cellulose) and papermaking mechanical processing (fine fiber screening) reduces the cost of large-scale application of nanomaterials by 40% (the cost of adding conventional nanomaterials increases by 20%).

[0077] 3. Functional derivative breakthrough: Basic functions (antibacterial, flame retardant) derive cross-border value (ecological degradation, production safety), exceeding the traditional functional definition of cigarette packaging materials and providing the possibility of technology transfer to the medical and environmental protection fields.

[0078] Conclusion: This patent achieves nonlinear improvement in functionality, cost, and environmental protection through multi-dimensional synergy of material composition, structural design, and process optimization. Its synergistic effect exceeds the cumulative effect of each technical means acting alone, reflecting the technical value of "system innovation".

[0079] Those skilled in the art should understand that the discussion of any of the above embodiments is merely illustrative and is not intended to imply that the scope of the present invention is limited to these examples. Within the scope of the present invention, the technical features in the above embodiments or different embodiments may be combined, the steps may be implemented in any order, and there are many other variations of the different aspects of the present invention as described above, which are not provided in detail for the sake of simplicity.

[0080] The present invention is intended to cover all such substitutions, modifications and variations that fall within the broad scope of the appended claims. Therefore, any omissions, modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A multifunctional tipping paper, characterized in that: Prepared from the following raw materials by weight: 20-30 parts of composite substrate, 10-15 parts of composite coating, and 55-70 parts of reinforcing slurry; The composite substrate is a bacterial cellulose-ε-polylysine composite substrate, and the bacterial cellulose is prepared by fermentation of Gluconacetobacter ZT-01; The composite coating comprises a water-based acrylic emulsion, a silicone oil antibacterial agent and a flame retardant monomer; The flame retardant monomer is a maleimide derivative containing a phosphorus-nitrogen synergistic structure; The reinforcing slurry is a plant fine fiber reinforcing slurry; The plant fine fibers are fine components obtained by screening, purifying and beating wood pulp or hemp pulp.

2. The multifunctional tipping paper according to claim 1, characterized in that: The average fiber length of the plant fine fibers is ≤0.5 mm, and the fine fiber content is ≥60%.

3. A method for preparing multifunctional tipping paper, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Step S1. Preparation of raw material slurry; Step S2. Preparation of a composite substrate; Step S3. Preparation of composite coating; Step S4. papermaking; Step S5: coating.

4. The method for preparing the multifunctional tipping paper according to claim 3, characterized in that: The preparation process of the raw material slurry in step S1 is as follows: Step S101. Bleached wood pulp or hemp pulp is selected as raw material, and a deflaking machine is used to disperse the fibers. The deflaking concentration is 3%-5%, and the deflaking time is 15-20 minutes. Step S102. Screening is performed using a pressure screen with a screening width of 0.15-0.2 mm to remove coarse fibers and impurities; Step S103: Use a disc grinder to perform beating treatment, with a beating concentration of 4%-6%, a disc grinding gap of 0.1-0.3mm, and a beating degree controlled at 30-45°SR to obtain a raw material slurry with a fine fiber content of ≥60%.

5. The method for preparing the multifunctional tipping paper according to claim 3, characterized in that: The preparation process of the composite substrate in step S2 is as follows: Step S201. Preparation of bacterial cellulose pulp; Step S202: Introducing a composite coating to obtain a composite substrate.

6. The method for preparing the multifunctional tipping paper according to claim 5, characterized in that: The preparation process of the bacterial cellulose pulp in step S201 is as follows: Step S2011. Prepare an aqueous solution containing 20 g / L glucose, 3 g / L peptone, 5 g / L yeast extract, and 1 g / L citric acid monohydrate, sterilize at 121°C for 15 min, and adjust the pH to 4.8-5.0; Step S2012: inoculating activated Gluconobacter ZT-01 and culturing at 25-30°C for 7-14 days to form a bacterial cellulose film; Step S2013: The bacterial cellulose membrane is swollen with a 0.5 mol / L sodium hydroxide solution for 2 hours, washed until neutral, and pulped to obtain a bacterial cellulose pulp with a concentration of 3%-10%.

7. The method for preparing the multifunctional tipping paper according to claim 5, characterized in that: The process of introducing the composite coating in step S202 is as follows: 0.1%-2% ε-polylysine, 0.5%-2% glycine and 0.5%-1.5% carbodiimide crosslinking agent were added to the bacterial cellulose pulp, shaken at 25-30° C. for 3-5 hours, and filtered to obtain a composite substrate.

8. The method for preparing the multifunctional tipping paper according to claim 3, characterized in that: The preparation process of the composite coating in step S3 is as follows: Step S301. Prepare an aqueous acrylic emulsion: Mix 10-25 parts of butyl acrylate, 20-40 parts of methyl methacrylate, 5-10 parts of acrylic acid, and 1-3 parts of a flame retardant monomer, emulsify with an aqueous solution of sodium lauryl sulfate, initiate polymerization with ammonium persulfate, and react at 70-80°C for 2-6 hours to obtain an emulsion; Step S302. Preparation of silicone oil antibacterial agent: epoxy silicone oil and tetramethylguanidine are mixed in a mass ratio of 1:0.5-1, and reacted at 50-60°C for 4-12h to obtain a silicone oil antibacterial agent containing guanidine groups; Step S303: Mix the emulsion, silicone oil antibacterial agent, 0.2-0.5 parts of talcum powder, 0.5-1 parts of iron oxide yellow powder, 20-40 parts of food-grade ethanol, and 10-30 parts of pure water to prepare a composite coating.

9. The method for preparing the multifunctional tipping paper according to claim 3, characterized in that: The papermaking process in step S4 is as follows: Step S401. The composite substrate is added to the raw material slurry at 2%-10% by dry weight, and 0.5%-1% of a polyacrylamide enhancer and 0.2%-0.5% of a stearic acid lubricant are added; Step S402: Paper is made by a Fourdrinier papermaking machine with a web concentration of 0.8%-1.2%, a machine speed of 200-300 m / min, and a drying temperature of 100-120° C. to obtain a matrix.

10. The method for preparing the multifunctional tipping paper according to claim 3, characterized in that: The coating process in step S5 is as follows: Step S501: Use comma blade coating method to coat the base paper on one side or both sides, with a coating amount of 5-10g / m 2 ; Step S502: After coating, the paper is dried at 100-120° C. for 5-10 minutes to obtain multifunctional tipping paper.

Images