Hatch cover determining method, device and equipment applied to ship, medium and product

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention provides a hatch cover determination method and device applied to a ship, equipment, a medium and a product, and the method comprises the steps: obtaining the index data of a cabin body under at least two detection indexes for the cabin body of each cabin body type; the cabin type is determined according to the cabin information; according to the cabin body type, obtaining cabin cover geometric data of at least one to-be-selected cabin cover from a cabin cover provider; and for the same cabin body type, through the index data, the cabin cover geometric data and a preset error range threshold, determining the adaptation attribute of the to-be-selected cabin cover and the cabin body. According to the technical scheme provided by the embodiment of the invention, for the same cabin body type, through the index data, the cabin cover geometric data and the preset error range threshold value, the adaptation attribute of the cabin cover and the cabin body is quickly determined, and the manual comparison and trial assembly times are reduced, so that the effects of improving the cabin cover installation success rate, the installation reliability and the installation efficiency are achieved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This disclosure relates to the field of marine technology, and in particular to methods, apparatus, equipment, media, and products for determining hatch covers in ships. Background Technology

[0002] In shipbuilding and operation, hatch covers, as crucial components for achieving hull sealing, waterproofing, dustproofing, and safety isolation, are widely used in various ship structures. Typically, hatch covers adapted to the same type of hull are required to be interchangeable to improve spare parts versatility.

[0003] Currently, when inspecting the interchangeability of hatch covers, it is usually necessary to first statistically analyze and compile thousands of possible combinations of hatch covers and hulls, and then hoist, install, and test them one by one according to the combination scheme. This results in problems such as missed inspections, incorrect inspections, time-consuming and labor-intensive processes, long inspection cycles, low inspection efficiency, and poor stability of inspection results. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This disclosure provides a method, apparatus, equipment, medium, and product for determining hatch covers in ships, so as to quickly determine the compatibility attributes between the hatch cover and the hull, reduce the number of manual comparisons and trial installations, and thereby improve the success rate, reliability, and efficiency of hatch cover installation.

[0005] In a first aspect, embodiments of this disclosure provide a method for determining hatch covers used in ships, the method comprising:

[0006] For each type of cabin, acquire the cabin's index data under at least two detection indicators; wherein, the at least two detection indicators include a first detection indicator for detecting the flip support block configured in the cabin, and a second detection indicator for detecting the anti-jump cylinder configured in the cabin; the cabin type is determined based on cabin information.

[0007] Based on the hull type, obtain at least one hatch geometry data for a hatch to be selected from the hatch supplier;

[0008] For the same cabin type, the compatibility attributes between the selected hatch and the cabin are determined by analyzing the index data, the hatch geometry data, and a pre-set error range threshold.

[0009] Secondly, embodiments of the present invention also provide a hatch cover determining device for use in ships, the device comprising:

[0010] The indicator data acquisition module is used to acquire indicator data of each type of cabin under at least two detection indicators; wherein, the at least two detection indicators include a first detection indicator for detecting the overturning support block configured in the cabin, and a second detection indicator for detecting the anti-jump cylinder configured in the cabin; the cabin type is determined based on cabin information.

[0011] The hatch cover geometry data acquisition module is used to acquire hatch cover geometry data of at least one hatch cover to be selected from the hatch cover provider according to the hatch body type.

[0012] The adaptation attribute determination module is used to determine the adaptation attributes of the hatch to be selected and the hatch body for the same type of cabin by using the index data, the hatch geometry data and a pre-set error range threshold.

[0013] Thirdly, embodiments of the present invention also provide an electronic device, the electronic device comprising:

[0014] One or more processors;

[0015] Storage device for storing one or more programs.

[0016] When the one or more programs are executed by the one or more processors, the one or more processors implement the hatch cover determination method applied to a ship as described in any embodiment of the present invention.

[0017] Fourthly, embodiments of the present invention also provide a storage medium containing computer-executable instructions, which, when executed by a computer processor, are used to perform the hatch cover determination method applied to a ship as described in any of the embodiments of the present invention.

[0018] Fifthly, embodiments of the present invention also provide a computer program product, including a computer program, characterized in that, when executed by a processor, the computer program implements the hatch cover determination method applied to a ship as described in any embodiment of the present invention.

[0019] The technical solution of this disclosure embodiment includes a ship with at least one type of hull, each hull requiring a hatch cover. First, for each hull type, index data is acquired under at least two detection indicators. These at least two detection indicators include a first detection indicator for detecting overturning support blocks configured within the hull, and a second detection indicator for detecting anti-jump cylinders configured within the hull. The hull type is determined based on hull information. Then, based on the hull type, hatch cover geometric data for at least one hatch cover to be selected is obtained from the hatch cover supplier. Finally, for the same hull type, the compatibility attributes between the hatch cover to be selected and the hull are determined by analyzing the index data, hatch cover geometric data, and a pre-set error range threshold. This solves the problems of missed detections, incorrect detections, time-consuming and labor-intensive processes, long inspection cycles, low inspection efficiency, and poor stability of inspection results when inspecting the interchangeability of hatch covers in the prior art. This involves first statistically analyzing and arranging thousands of hatch cover and hull combinations, and then hoisting, installing, and inspecting each combination one by one according to the combination scheme. This embodiment of the present disclosure enables the rapid determination of the compatibility attributes between the hatch cover and the cabin body for the same cabin type by using index data, hatch cover geometric data, and a pre-set error range threshold. This reduces the number of manual comparisons and trial installations, thereby improving the success rate, reliability, and efficiency of hatch cover installation. Attached Figure Description

[0020] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the accompanying drawings used in describing the embodiments are briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings described are only a portion of the drawings of the embodiments to be described in this invention, and not all of the drawings. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained from these drawings without any creative effort.

[0021] Figure 1 This is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining a hatch cover in a ship, provided by an embodiment of this disclosure;

[0022] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of a flipping support block provided in an embodiment of this disclosure;

[0023] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of an anti-jump cylinder provided in an embodiment of this disclosure;

[0024] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of a hatch provided in an embodiment of this disclosure;

[0025] Figure 5 This is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining a hatch cover in a ship, provided by an embodiment of this disclosure;

[0026] Figure 6This is a schematic diagram of a hatch cover determining device applied in a ship, provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0027] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of this disclosure. Detailed Implementation

[0028] The present invention will now be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and not intended to limit it. Furthermore, it should be noted that, for ease of description, the accompanying drawings show only the parts relevant to the present invention, and not all of the structures.

[0029] Before introducing the technical solutions provided by the embodiments of this disclosure, the application scenarios can be illustrated by example. The technical solutions provided by the embodiments of this disclosure can be applied to scenarios where the compatibility between hatch covers and hulls needs to be determined. For example, it can be applied to scenarios where hatch covers are selected in batches. Based on the technical solutions of the embodiments of this disclosure, for the same hull type, the compatibility attributes between hatch covers and hulls can be quickly determined by analyzing index data, hatch cover geometric data, and a pre-set error range threshold. This reduces the number of manual comparisons and trial installations, thereby improving the success rate, reliability, and efficiency of hatch cover installation.

[0030] Example 1

[0031] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a method for determining a hatch cover in a ship, provided by an embodiment of this disclosure. This embodiment is applicable to situations where the compatibility between a hatch cover and a hull is determined. This method can be executed by a hatch cover determination device applied to a ship. This device can be implemented in the form of software and / or hardware. The hardware can be a mobile electronic device. This electronic device can execute the hatch cover determination method for a ship provided by this technical solution.

[0032] like Figure 1 As shown, the ship includes at least one type of hull, each hull requiring a hatch cover, and the method includes:

[0033] S110. For each type of cabin, obtain the cabin's indicator data under at least two detection indicators.

[0034] The testing criteria include at least two indicators: a first indicator for testing the rollover support blocks installed in the cabin, and a second indicator for testing the anti-jump cylinders installed in the cabin. The cabin type is determined based on the cabin information.

[0035] It should be noted that a hull refers to an enclosed or semi-enclosed space unit within a ship used for loading, storage, or providing functional space. A hull is typically enclosed by internal walls, decks, and longitudinal beams, and has clearly defined boundaries and volumes. A hatch cover refers to a sealing and passageway located at a hull opening, serving as a passageway for waterproofing, gas protection, loading and unloading, and maintenance. Hull information can include the hull's function, the media stored within it, and related design attributes. Hull types can be classified based on one or more of the following: hull dimensions, hull weight class, media stored within it, hull structural form, and hull function.

[0036] It should also be noted that the tilting support block refers to a device used to provide support when the hatch cover is tilted, in its open position, or in the open state. The tilting support block prevents deformation or displacement of the hatch cover due to its own weight or external forces. The first testing indicator refers to a type of quantifiable test data used to evaluate the relevant dimensions of the tilting support block. The anti-jump cylinder refers to a cylindrical limiting component used to prevent jumping and lifting, suppressing the hatch cover from jumping, lifting, or disengaging under the influence of ship vibration, wave impact, or pressure differences, achieving anti-vibration locking, limiting, and guiding. The second testing indicator refers to a type of quantifiable test data used to evaluate the relevant dimensions of the anti-jump cylinder.

[0037] Optionally, the hull includes an inner wall, at least two pairs of flip support blocks are deployed at a first preset position on the inner wall; the flip support blocks are used to provide support for the selected hatch cover; at least two anti-jump cylinders are deployed at a second preset position on the inner wall, the anti-jump cylinders are used to limit the jump of the selected hatch cover.

[0038] It should be noted that the hull can be a cuboid or a cube, and along the length of the ship, it includes four internal walls: fore, aft, left, and right. The first preset position is a symmetrical position, which can be the fore and aft internal walls along the length of the ship; alternatively, it can be the port side internal wall and the aft starboard side internal wall along the length of the ship. At least two pairs of symmetrically arranged tilting support blocks are deployed on the internal walls of the hull. In scenarios where the hull is deep or the hatch has complex stress conditions, multiple pairs of tilting support blocks can be installed on a single internal wall along the depth of the hull, with each pair located at a different depth. For example, see... Figure 2 On the port side inner wall of the hull, a pair of upper-level tilting support blocks, a pair of middle-level tilting support blocks, and a pair of lower-level tilting support blocks can be deployed along the depth direction of the hull to form a tiered support system. These upper, middle, and lower tilting support blocks are used to selectively contact the hatch cover under different operating conditions to provide support or restraint. Each pair of tilting support blocks may include two tilting support blocks. See also... Figure 2For the first to eighth compartments, each pair of tilting support blocks installed on the port side inner wall of the compartment contains two tilting support blocks.

[0039] It should also be noted that the second preset position and the first preset position are located on the same pair of symmetrical inner walls, meaning the anti-jump cylinder and the overturning support block are set on the same inner wall of the cabin. When the first preset position is selected as the front inner wall and the rear inner wall, the second preset position is correspondingly set on the front inner wall and the rear inner wall; when the first preset position is selected as the port side inner wall and the starboard side inner wall, the second preset position is correspondingly set on the port side inner wall and the starboard side inner wall. Thus, the anti-jump limiting and the supporting force are coordinated on the same side inner wall, improving the overall stability of the hatch support and anti-jump mechanism. The anti-jump cylinder is geometrically positioned corresponding to each pair of overturning support blocks; that is, for the same pair of overturning support blocks, the anti-jump cylinder is arranged on the centerline of that pair of overturning support blocks. The centerline is the perpendicular bisector of the line connecting the installation positions of the pair of overturning support blocks. By setting the anti-jump cylinder on this centerline, the anti-jump limiting effect and the supporting force of the pair of overturning support blocks can be centrally matched, reducing the risk of off-center loading and torsion. See also Figure 3 An anti-jump cylinder is installed on the center line of each pair of flipping support blocks.

[0040] In this embodiment, for each pair of flip support blocks, a first height value of the pair of flip support blocks in a first direction and a first distance information of the pair of flip support blocks in a second direction are obtained; for each anti-jump cylinder, a second distance information between the anti-jump cylinder and the anti-jump cylinder in the adjacent cabin in a second direction is obtained.

[0041] Among them, the first direction and the second direction are two perpendicular directions.

[0042] It should be noted that the first direction and the second direction are two mutually perpendicular coordinate directions defined within the compartment. The first direction is the ship's depth direction, i.e., the vertical height from the deck to the bottom of the ship. Correspondingly, the second direction is perpendicular to the ship's depth direction and can be determined as a horizontal direction along the ship's length or beam, depending on the specific inner wall of the selected compartment. For a pair of tilting support blocks, the first height value refers to the installation height of the two tilting support blocks respectively in the first direction, used to characterize whether the two tilting support blocks are horizontal. The first distance information of the tilting support blocks in the second direction refers to the spacing information of the pair of tilting support blocks in the second direction. See also... Figure 2 The first distance information L1-L8 usually refers to the relative distance between the two flip support blocks in each pair in the second direction.

[0043] It should also be noted that the second distance information refers to the distance between this bail arrestor and bail arrestors "in adjacent compartments" in the second direction, used to characterize the arrangement spacing of the bail arrestors along the second direction. See also Figure 3L(2+3), L(3+4), L(4+5), L(5+6), and L(6+7) are the second distance information, respectively.

[0044] Specifically, the vessel includes at least one type of hull, and each hull is equipped with a hatch cover. Each hull contains an inner wall, at least two pairs of overturning support blocks are deployed at a first predetermined location on the inner wall. At least two anti-jump cylinders are deployed at a second predetermined location on the inner wall. For multiple hulls of each hull type, first indicator data for each hull is obtained under a first detection indicator used to detect the overturning support blocks configured in the hull, and second indicator data for a second detection indicator used to detect the anti-jump cylinders configured in the hull.

[0045] S120. Based on the hull type, obtain at least one hatch geometry data for a hatch to be selected from the hatch supplier.

[0046] It should be noted that different hull types (such as cargo holds, ballast tanks, oil tanks, etc.) have different hatch opening dimensions, stress and sealing requirements. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain the hatch cover geometry data of at least one hatch cover to be selected that matches the hull type from the hatch cover supplier.

[0047] It should also be noted that...

[0048] Optionally, the hatch to be selected includes at least two slotted structures, each slotted structure cooperating with a flip support block and an anti-jump cylinder. For each slotted structure, a second height value of the slotted structure in a first direction and a third distance information of the slotted structure in a second direction are obtained.

[0049] The slotted structure can be used in conjunction with the tilting support block, allowing the hatch to land on the support block after tilting, providing support and positioning. The slotted structure can also be used with the anti-jump cylinder, allowing the cylinder to enter the slotted structure and thus achieving anti-jump limiting. Slotted structures are located symmetrically on the hatch. See also Figure 4 The hatch has slotted structures on both the left and right sides.

[0050] It should be noted that the second height value refers to the height position parameter of the slot structure in the first direction, such as the height of the bottom surface, center, or upper edge of the slot relative to the hatch cover reference plane or a certain design reference. The second height value is used to compare with the first height value of the tilting support block on the side of the hull to determine whether it can be aligned vertically during assembly and whether it will collide or fall off. See also Figure 4The second height value can be the height of A, B, C, and D relative to the hatch reference plane or relative to a certain design reference. The third distance information refers to the distance parameter of the slot structure in the second direction, typically used to describe the center distance between the two slots. This third distance information is compared with the first distance information of the hull side rollover support block and the second distance information of the anti-jump cylinder to determine whether they match in horizontal arrangement and whether they can accurately engage and limit movement. See also Figure 4 The distance between A and B, or the distance between C and D, is the third distance information.

[0051] Specifically, based on the hull type, the geometric data of at least one hatch cover matching the hull type is obtained from the hatch cover supplier. Using this geometric data, it is determined whether the hull and hatch cover can be vertically aligned during assembly, whether they will collide or fall off, and whether they are horizontally matched and can accurately engage and limit movement.

[0052] S130. For the same cabin type, determine the compatibility attributes of the selected hatch and cabin by analyzing the index data, hatch geometry data, and a pre-set error range threshold.

[0053] Specifically, under the premise of the same hull type, the index data of all hull sides, the geometric data of all hatch covers, and the pre-set error range threshold are compared and calculated to determine whether any hatch cover and any hull are compatible under the same hull type.

[0054] The technical solution of this disclosure embodiment includes a ship with at least one type of hull, each hull requiring a hatch cover. First, for each hull type, index data is acquired under at least two detection indicators. These at least two detection indicators include a first detection indicator for detecting overturning support blocks configured within the hull, and a second detection indicator for detecting anti-jump cylinders configured within the hull. The hull type is determined based on hull information. Then, based on the hull type, hatch cover geometric data for at least one hatch cover to be selected is obtained from the hatch cover supplier. Finally, for the same hull type, the compatibility attributes between the hatch cover to be selected and the hull are determined by analyzing the index data, hatch cover geometric data, and a pre-set error range threshold. This solves the problems of missed detections, incorrect detections, time-consuming and labor-intensive processes, long inspection cycles, low inspection efficiency, and poor stability of inspection results when inspecting the interchangeability of hatch covers in the prior art. This involves first statistically analyzing and arranging thousands of hatch cover and hull combinations, and then hoisting, installing, and inspecting each combination one by one according to the combination scheme. This embodiment of the present disclosure enables the rapid determination of the compatibility attributes between the hatch cover and the cabin body for the same cabin type by using index data, hatch cover geometric data, and a pre-set error range threshold. This reduces the number of manual comparisons and trial installations, thereby improving the success rate, reliability, and efficiency of hatch cover installation.

[0055] Example 2

[0056] Figure 5 This is a flowchart illustrating the method for determining hatch covers in ships according to an embodiment of the present invention. Based on the aforementioned embodiments, it provides a more detailed explanation of how to determine the compatibility attributes between the hatch cover to be selected and the hull by analyzing index data, hatch cover geometric data, and a pre-set error range threshold. For specific implementation details, please refer to the technical solution of this embodiment. Technical terms that are the same as or corresponding to those in the above embodiments will not be repeated here.

[0057] like Figure 5 As shown, the method specifically includes the following steps:

[0058] S210. For each type of cabin, obtain the cabin's indicator data under at least two detection indicators.

[0059] S220. Based on the hull type, obtain hatch geometry data for at least one hatch to be selected from the hatch supplier.

[0060] S230. For the same type of cabin, the height matching attribute between the flip support block and the selected hatch is determined based on the first height value, the second height value and the preset first error range threshold.

[0061] The first error range threshold refers to a pre-set allowable height deviation range used to determine whether there will be collisions, suspension, or poor contact during assembly. For example, the first error range threshold can be 8mm. If the difference between the first height value and the second height value is within the first error range threshold, the height adaptation attribute can be determined as height-adapted; if the difference between the first height value and the second height value is not within the first error range threshold, the height adaptation attribute can be determined as height-incompatible.

[0062] Specifically, under the same hull type, it is determined whether the height of the flip support block inside the hull matches that of the selected hatch in the first direction, and a height adaptation attribute, i.e., a height adaptation conclusion, is given. Determining the height adaptation attribute between the flip support block and the selected hatch is to ensure that after the hatch is flipped into place, its slot can accurately fall on the support position of the flip support block within the allowable deviation, thereby achieving reliable support and correct force distribution.

[0063] S240. For a flip support block and a hatch to be selected under the same cabin type, determine the first position adaptation attribute between the flip support block and the hatch to be selected based on the first distance information, the third distance information and the preset second error range threshold.

[0064] The second error range threshold refers to a pre-set allowable spacing deviation range, used to determine whether the flipping support block can accurately enter or align with the hatch slot and form effective support. For example, the second error range threshold can be 7.5mm. If the difference between the first distance information and the third distance information is within the second error range threshold, the first position adaptation attribute can be determined as positionally adapted; if the difference between the first distance information and the third distance information is not within the second error range threshold, the first position adaptation attribute can be determined as positionally mismatched.

[0065] Specifically, for the same cabin type, in addition to comparing whether the heights are compatible, it is also necessary to compare whether the horizontal distance between the flip support block and the hatch slot in the second direction matches, and based on this, give the first positional compatibility attribute between the flip support block and the hatch to be selected, that is, the positional matching conclusion.

[0066] S250. For the same type of cabin, the second positional adaptation attribute between the anti-bounce cylinder and the hatch to be selected is determined based on the second distance information, the first distance information, and the pre-set third error range threshold.

[0067] It should be noted that the third error range threshold refers to a pre-set allowable deviation range used to determine whether the anti-raiding cylinder can be aligned with the limiting slot of the hatch cover, avoiding assembly misalignment that could lead to jamming, collision, or limit failure. For example, the third error range threshold can be 4mm. Under the same hatch type, it is necessary to determine whether the anti-raiding cylinder inside the hatch body matches the slot used for anti-raiding engagement on the selected hatch cover in the second direction, and output the second position adaptation attribute, that is, the matching conclusion of the anti-raiding limit in position.

[0068] Optionally, based on the first distance information and the fourth distance information of the overturning support block in the adjacent compartment in the second direction, the fifth distance information is determined; based on the second distance information, the fifth distance information and the preset third error range threshold, the second position adaptation attribute between the anti-jump cylinder and the hatch to be selected is determined.

[0069] The fourth distance information refers to the distance between the tilting support blocks in adjacent compartments in the second direction. For a given compartment, the first distance information between a pair of tilting support blocks within this compartment and the first distance information between a pair of tilting support blocks in an adjacent compartment are determined. The fourth distance information between adjacent tilting support blocks within this compartment and the adjacent compartment is also determined. The sum of half the first distance information between a pair of tilting support blocks within this compartment, half the first distance information between a pair of tilting support blocks in an adjacent compartment, and the fourth distance information is determined as the fifth distance information. The fifth distance information refers to the theoretical distance between adjacent anti-jump cylinders.

[0070] It should be noted that if the difference between the fifth distance information and the second distance information is within the third error range threshold, the second location adaptation attribute can be determined as location adaptation; if the difference between the fifth distance information and the second distance information is not within the third error range threshold, the second location adaptation attribute can be determined as location mismatch.

[0071] Specifically, for the same hull type, in addition to comparing whether the heights are compatible, it is also necessary to compare whether the horizontal distance between the anti-jump cylinder and the hatch opening in the second direction matches, and based on this, give the second positional compatibility attribute between the anti-jump cylinder and the hatch to be selected, that is, the positional matching conclusion between the anti-jump cylinder and the hatch to be selected.

[0072] S260. Based on the height adaptation attribute, the first position adaptation attribute, and the second position adaptation attribute, determine the adaptation attributes of the hatch and the body to be selected.

[0073] Specifically, if the height adaptation attribute is "adapted", the first position adaptation attribute is "adapted", and the second position adaptation attribute is "adapted", then the adaptation attribute of the hatch to be selected and the cabin body is determined to be "adapted".

[0074] The technical solution of this disclosure embodiment acquires index data of the cabin under at least two detection indicators for each cabin type. Based on the cabin type, at least one hatch geometry data for a candidate hatch is obtained from the hatch supplier. Then, for a tilting support block and a candidate hatch under the same cabin type, a height adaptation attribute between the tilting support block and the candidate hatch is determined based on a first height value, a second height value, and a pre-set first error range threshold. Further, for a tilting support block and a candidate hatch under the same cabin type, a first position adaptation attribute between the tilting support block and the candidate hatch is determined based on first distance information, third distance information, and a pre-set second error range threshold. Further, for an anti-raiding cylinder and a candidate hatch under the same cabin type, a second position adaptation attribute between the anti-raiding cylinder and the candidate hatch is determined based on second distance information, first distance information, and a pre-set third error range threshold. Finally, based on the height adaptation attribute, the first position adaptation attribute, and the second position adaptation attribute, the adaptation attributes of the hatch cover and the cabin body to be selected are determined. By collecting cabin body detection indicators and introducing hatch cover geometric data and error thresholds, quantitative matching and rapid determination of hatch cover selection under different cabin types can be achieved. Adaptation verification is performed from three dimensions: height, position of the flip support block, and position of the anti-jump cylinder. Interference and mismatch can be identified in advance, reducing trial assembly rework and improving assembly efficiency and consistency. The final adaptation conclusion is output by combining the three types of adaptation attributes, ensuring the reliability of support and anti-jump functions, improving safety and quality traceability, and reducing overall cost and cycle time.

[0075] Example 3

[0076] Figure 6This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the hatch cover determining device applied in a ship according to an embodiment of this disclosure, as shown below. Figure 6 As shown, the device includes: an index data acquisition module 310, a hatch geometric data acquisition module 320, and an adaptation attribute determination module 330.

[0077] The indicator data acquisition module is used to acquire indicator data of each type of cabin under at least two detection indicators; wherein, the at least two detection indicators include a first detection indicator for detecting the overturning support block configured in the cabin, and a second detection indicator for detecting the anti-jump cylinder configured in the cabin; the cabin type is determined based on cabin information; the hatch geometry data acquisition module is used to acquire hatch geometry data of at least one hatch to be selected from the hatch supplier based on the cabin type; the adaptation attribute determination module is used to determine the adaptation attribute between the hatch to be selected and the cabin for the same cabin type by using the indicator data, the hatch geometry data, and a pre-set error range threshold.

[0078] The technical solution of this disclosure embodiment includes a ship with at least one type of hull, each hull requiring a hatch cover. First, for each hull type, index data is acquired under at least two detection indicators. These at least two detection indicators include a first detection indicator for detecting overturning support blocks configured within the hull, and a second detection indicator for detecting anti-jump cylinders configured within the hull. The hull type is determined based on hull information. Then, based on the hull type, hatch cover geometric data for at least one hatch cover to be selected is obtained from the hatch cover supplier. Finally, for the same hull type, the compatibility attributes between the hatch cover to be selected and the hull are determined by analyzing the index data, hatch cover geometric data, and a pre-set error range threshold. This solves the problems of missed detections, incorrect detections, time-consuming and labor-intensive processes, long inspection cycles, low inspection efficiency, and poor stability of inspection results when inspecting the interchangeability of hatch covers in the prior art. This involves first statistically analyzing and arranging thousands of hatch cover and hull combinations, and then hoisting, installing, and inspecting each combination one by one according to the combination scheme. This embodiment of the present disclosure enables the rapid determination of the compatibility attributes between the hatch cover and the cabin body for the same cabin type by using index data, hatch cover geometric data, and a pre-set error range threshold. This reduces the number of manual comparisons and trial installations, thereby improving the success rate, reliability, and efficiency of hatch cover installation.

[0079] Based on the above technical solutions, the cabin includes an inner wall, and at least two pairs of flip support blocks are deployed at a first preset position on the inner wall; the flip support blocks are used to provide support for the hatch to be selected; at least two anti-jump cylinders are deployed at a second preset position on the inner wall, and the anti-jump cylinders are used to limit the jump of the hatch to be selected.

[0080] Based on the above technical solutions, the index data acquisition module 310 is further configured to acquire, for each pair of flipping support blocks, a first height value of the pair of flipping support blocks in a first direction and a first distance information of the pair of flipping support blocks in a second direction; wherein, the first direction and the second direction are two perpendicular directions; and for each anti-jump cylinder, acquire the second distance information of the anti-jump cylinder and the anti-jump cylinder in the adjacent cabin in the second direction.

[0081] Based on the above technical solutions, the hatch to be selected includes at least two slot structures, which cooperate with the flip support block and the anti-jump cylinder respectively. The hatch geometry data acquisition module 320 is also used to acquire, for each slot structure, a second height value of the slot structure in a first direction and a third distance information of the slot structure in a second direction.

[0082] Based on the above technical solutions, the adaptation attribute determination module 330 includes: a height adaptation attribute determination submodule, a first position adaptation attribute determination submodule, a second position adaptation attribute determination submodule, and an adaptation attribute calculation submodule.

[0083] The module includes a height adaptation attribute determination submodule, used to determine the height adaptation attribute between a tilting support block and a hatch to be selected, based on a first height value, a second height value, and a pre-set first error range threshold, for a tilting support block and a hatch to be selected under the same hull type; a first position adaptation attribute determination submodule, used to determine the first position adaptation attribute between a tilting support block and a hatch to be selected, based on a first distance information, a third distance information, and a pre-set second error range threshold, for a tilting support block and a hatch to be selected, under the same hull type; a second position adaptation attribute determination submodule, used to determine the second position adaptation attribute between a blast arrestor and a hatch to be selected, based on a second distance information, a first distance information, and a pre-set third error range threshold, for a blast arrestor and a hatch to be selected, under the same hull type; and an adaptation attribute calculation submodule, used to determine the adaptation attribute between the hatch to be selected and the hull, based on the height adaptation attribute, the first position adaptation attribute, and the second position adaptation attribute.

[0084] Based on the above technical solutions, the second position adaptation attribute determination submodule is also used to determine the fifth distance information based on the first distance information and the fourth distance information of the overturning support block in the second direction in the adjacent compartment; and to determine the second position adaptation attribute between the anti-jump cylinder and the hatch to be selected based on the second distance information, the fifth distance information and the preset third error range threshold.

[0085] The hatch cover determination device for ships provided in this disclosure can execute the hatch cover determination method for ships provided in any embodiment of this disclosure, and has the corresponding functional modules and beneficial effects of the method execution.

[0086] It is worth noting that the various units and modules included in the above-mentioned device are only divided according to functional logic, but are not limited to the above division, as long as the corresponding functions can be realized; in addition, the specific names of each functional unit are only for easy differentiation and are not used to limit the protection scope of the embodiments of this disclosure.

[0087] Example 4

[0088] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of this disclosure. Refer to the following... Figure 7 It illustrates an electronic device suitable for implementing embodiments of the present disclosure (e.g., Figure 7 The diagram below shows the structure of the terminal device or server 500. The terminal device in this embodiment may include, but is not limited to, mobile terminals such as mobile phones, laptops, digital radio receivers, PDAs (personal digital assistants), PADs (tablet computers), PMPs (portable multimedia players), and vehicle terminals (e.g., vehicle navigation terminals). Figure 7 The electronic device shown is merely an example and should not be construed as limiting the functionality and scope of the embodiments disclosed herein.

[0089] like Figure 7 As shown, electronic device 500 may include a processing unit (e.g., a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit, etc.) 501, which can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to a program stored in read-only memory (ROM) 502 or a program loaded from storage device 508 into random access memory (RAM) 503. The RAM 503 also stores various programs and data required for the operation of electronic device 500. The processing unit 501, ROM 502, and RAM 503 are interconnected via bus 504. An edit / output (I / O) interface 505 is also connected to bus 504.

[0090] Typically, the following devices can be connected to I / O interface 505: input devices 506 including, for example, touchscreens, touchpads, keyboards, mice, cameras, microphones, accelerometers, gyroscopes, etc.; output devices 507 including, for example, liquid crystal displays (LCDs), speakers, vibrators, etc.; storage devices 508 including, for example, magnetic tapes, hard disks, etc.; and communication devices 509. Communication device 509 allows electronic device 500 to communicate wirelessly or wiredly with other devices to exchange data. Although Figure 7An electronic device 500 with various devices is shown; however, it should be understood that it is not required to implement or possess all of the devices shown. More or fewer devices may be implemented or possessed alternatively.

[0091] In particular, according to embodiments of this disclosure, the processes described above with reference to the flowcharts can be implemented as computer software programs. For example, embodiments of this disclosure include a computer program product comprising a computer program carried on a non-transitory computer-readable medium, the computer program containing program code for performing the methods shown in the flowcharts. In such embodiments, the computer program can be downloaded and installed from a network via a communication device 509, or installed from a storage device 508, or installed from a ROM 502. When the computer program is executed by the processing device 501, it performs the functions defined in the methods of embodiments of this disclosure.

[0092] The names of messages or information exchanged between multiple devices in the embodiments of this disclosure are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of such messages or information.

[0093] The electronic device provided in this embodiment and the hatch cover determination method for ships provided in the above embodiments belong to the same inventive concept. Technical details not described in detail in this embodiment can be found in the above embodiments, and this embodiment has the same beneficial effects as the above embodiments.

[0094] Example 5

[0095] This disclosure provides a computer storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the hatch cover determination method for ships provided in the above embodiments.

[0096] It should be noted that the computer-readable medium described in this disclosure can be a computer-readable signal medium or a computer-readable storage medium, or any combination thereof. A computer-readable storage medium can be, for example,—but not limited to—an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination thereof. More specific examples of a computer-readable storage medium may include, but are not limited to: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fiber, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage device, magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination thereof. In this disclosure, a computer-readable storage medium can be any tangible medium containing or storing a program that can be used by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. In this disclosure, a computer-readable signal medium can include a data signal propagated in baseband or as part of a carrier wave, carrying computer-readable program code. Such propagated data signals can take various forms, including but not limited to electromagnetic signals, optical signals, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer-readable signal medium can be any computer-readable medium other than a computer-readable storage medium, which can send, propagate, or transmit a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. The program code contained on the computer-readable medium can be transmitted using any suitable medium, including but not limited to: wires, optical fibers, RF (radio frequency), etc., or any suitable combination thereof.

[0097] In some implementations, the server may communicate using any currently known or future-developed network protocol such as HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol) and may interconnect with digital data communication (e.g., communication networks) of any form or medium. Examples of communication networks include local area networks (“LANs”), wide area networks (“WANs”), the Internet (e.g., the Internet), and peer-to-peer networks (e.g., ad hoc peer-to-peer networks), as well as any currently known or future-developed networks.

[0098] The aforementioned computer-readable medium may be included in the aforementioned electronic device; or it may exist independently and not assembled into the electronic device.

[0099] The aforementioned computer-readable medium carries one or more programs that, when executed by the electronic device, cause the electronic device to:

[0100] For each type of cabin, acquire the cabin's index data under at least two detection indicators; wherein, the at least two detection indicators include a first detection indicator for detecting the flip support block configured in the cabin, and a second detection indicator for detecting the anti-jump cylinder configured in the cabin; the cabin type is determined based on cabin information.

[0101] Based on the hull type, obtain at least one hatch geometry data for a hatch to be selected from the hatch supplier;

[0102] For the same cabin type, the compatibility attributes between the selected hatch and the cabin are determined by analyzing the index data, the hatch geometry data, and a pre-set error range threshold.

[0103] Computer program code for performing the operations of this disclosure can be written in one or more programming languages ​​or a combination thereof, including but not limited to object-oriented programming languages ​​such as Java, Smalltalk, and C++, as well as conventional procedural programming languages ​​such as the "C" language or similar programming languages. The program code can be executed entirely on the user's computer, partially on the user's computer, as a standalone software package, partially on the user's computer and partially on a remote computer, or entirely on a remote computer or server. In cases involving remote computers, the remote computer can be connected to the user's computer via any type of network—including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN)—or can be connected to an external computer (e.g., via the Internet using an Internet service provider).

[0104] The flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of this disclosure. In this regard, each block in a flowchart or block diagram may represent a module, segment, or portion of code containing one or more executable instructions for implementing a specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions indicated in the blocks may occur in a different order than those indicated in the drawings. For example, two consecutively indicated blocks may actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they may sometimes be executed in reverse order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each block in the block diagrams and / or flowcharts, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and / or flowcharts, can be implemented using a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or operation, or using a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0105] The units described in the embodiments of this disclosure can be implemented in software or hardware. The names of the units are not, in some cases, intended to limit the specific unit.

[0106] The functions described above in this document can be performed at least in part by one or more hardware logic components. For example, exemplary types of hardware logic components that can be used, without limitation, include: field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), application-specific standard products (ASSPs), system-on-a-chip (SoCs), complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs), and so on.

[0107] In the context of this disclosure, a machine-readable medium can be a tangible medium that may contain or store a program for use by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. A machine-readable medium can be a machine-readable signal medium or a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable medium can be, but is not limited to, electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor systems, apparatus, or devices, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples of machine-readable storage media include electrical connections based on one or more wires, portable computer disks, hard disks, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fiber, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage devices, magnetic storage devices, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

[0108] The above description is merely a preferred embodiment of this disclosure and an explanation of the technical principles employed. Those skilled in the art should understand that the scope of this disclosure is not limited to technical solutions formed by specific combinations of the above-described technical features, but should also cover other technical solutions formed by arbitrary combinations of the above-described technical features or their equivalents without departing from the above-described concept. For example, technical solutions formed by substituting the above features with (but not limited to) technical features disclosed in this disclosure that have similar functions.

[0109] Furthermore, while the operations are described in a specific order, this should not be construed as requiring these operations to be performed in the specific order shown or in a sequential order. In certain environments, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Similarly, while several specific implementation details are included in the above discussion, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of this disclosure. Certain features described in the context of individual embodiments may also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features described in the context of a single embodiment may also be implemented individually or in any suitable sub-combination in multiple embodiments.

[0110] Although the subject matter has been described using language specific to structural features and / or methodological logic, it should be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or actions described above. Rather, the specific features and actions described above are merely illustrative examples of implementing the claims.

Claims

1. A method for determining hatch covers used in ships, characterized in that, The ship includes at least one type of hull, each hull requiring a hatch cover, and the method includes: For each type of cabin, acquire the cabin's index data under at least two detection indicators; wherein, the at least two detection indicators include a first detection indicator for detecting the flip support block configured in the cabin, and a second detection indicator for detecting the anti-jump cylinder configured in the cabin; the cabin type is determined based on cabin information. Based on the hull type, obtain at least one hatch geometry data for a hatch to be selected from the hatch supplier; For the same cabin type, the compatibility attributes between the selected hatch and the cabin are determined by analyzing the index data, the hatch geometry data, and a pre-set error range threshold.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The cabin includes an inner wall, and at least two pairs of flip-up support blocks are deployed at a first preset position on the inner wall; the flip-up support blocks are used to provide support for the selected hatch cover. At least two anti-jump cylinders are deployed at a second predetermined position on the inner wall of the cabin. The anti-jump cylinders are used to limit the jump of the selected hatch.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The acquisition of at least one of the cabin's indicator data under at least two detection indicators includes: For each pair of flip support blocks, obtain the first height value of the pair of flip support blocks in the first direction, and the first distance information of the pair of flip support blocks in the second direction; wherein, the first direction and the second direction are two perpendicular directions; For each shock absorber, obtain the second distance information between the shock absorber and the shock absorbers in the adjacent compartment in the second direction.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The hatch to be selected includes at least two slotted structures, which respectively cooperate with the overturning support block and the anti-jump cylinder. The step of obtaining hatch geometry data for at least one hatch to be selected from the hatch supplier based on the hatch type includes: For each slot structure, obtain the second height value of the slot structure in the first direction, and the third distance information of the slot structure in the second direction.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, For the same cabin type, the method of determining the compatibility attributes between the selected hatch and the cabin by analyzing the indicator data, the hatch geometry data, and a pre-set error range threshold includes: For a flip support block and a hatch to be selected under the same cabin type, the height compatibility attribute between the flip support block and the hatch to be selected is determined based on a first height value, a second height value, and a preset first error range threshold. For a flip support block and a hatch to be selected under the same cabin type, a first positional adaptation attribute between the flip support block and the hatch to be selected is determined based on the first distance information, the third distance information and the preset second error range threshold. For the same type of cabin, the second positional compatibility attribute between the anti-bounce cylinder and the selected hatch is determined based on the second distance information, the first distance information, and the preset third error range threshold. Based on the height adaptation attribute, the first position adaptation attribute, and the second position adaptation attribute, the adaptation attributes of the hatch to be selected and the cabin body are determined.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that, The determination of the second positional compatibility attribute between the anti-jump cylinder and the selected hatch based on the second distance information, the first distance information, and a pre-set third error range threshold includes: Based on the first distance information and the fourth distance information of the overturning support block in the adjacent compartment in the second direction, the fifth distance information is determined; Based on the second distance information, the fifth distance information, and the preset third error range threshold, the second positional adaptation attribute between the anti-jump cylinder and the hatch to be selected is determined.

7. A hatch cover determining device applied in a ship, characterized in that, include: The indicator data acquisition module is used to acquire indicator data of each type of cabin under at least two detection indicators; wherein, the at least two detection indicators include a first detection indicator for detecting the overturning support block configured in the cabin, and a second detection indicator for detecting the anti-jump cylinder configured in the cabin; the cabin type is determined based on cabin information. The hatch cover geometry data acquisition module is used to acquire hatch cover geometry data of at least one hatch cover to be selected from the hatch cover provider according to the hatch body type. The adaptation attribute determination module is used to determine the adaptation attributes of the hatch to be selected and the hatch body for the same type of cabin by using the index data, the hatch geometry data and a pre-set error range threshold.

8. An electronic device, characterized in that, The electronic device includes: One or more processors; Storage device for storing one or more programs. When one or more programs are executed by one or more processors, the one or more processors implement the hatch cover determination method applied to a ship as described in any one of claims 1-6.

9. A storage medium containing computer-executable instructions, characterized in that, The computer-executable instructions, when executed by a computer processor, are used to perform the hatch cover determination method applied to a ship as described in any one of claims 1-6.

10. A computer program product, comprising a computer program, characterized in that, When executed by a processor, the computer program implements the hatch cover determination method applied to a ship as described in any one of claims 1-6.

Images