Evaluation method and equipment for ecological restoration effect of surface mine, storage medium and product

Abstract

The invention discloses a surface mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method and device, a storage medium and a product, and relates to the field of ecological restoration. The evaluation method comprises the following steps: determining evaluation indexes; obtaining the required repair amount, the actual repair amount, the actual repair quality score and the weight of each evaluation index; according to the required repair amount, the actual repair amount and the actual repair quality score of each evaluation index, the repair effect of each evaluation index is calculated; determining a main index and a secondary index according to the weight of each evaluation index; calculating effect basic evaluation according to the weight and the repair effect of each main index, and calculating effect deviation according to the weight and the repair effect of each main index and the weight and the repair effect of each secondary index; and evaluating the ecological restoration effect of the surface mine according to the effect basic evaluation and the effect deviation. The calculation process is relatively simple, actual operation execution is facilitated, and the problem that the analysis process of a traditional method is tedious and complex is solved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of ecological restoration, and in particular to an open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method, equipment, storage medium and product. Background Art

[0002] Open-pit mining will produce sinkholes, and the discarded soil and rock will occupy a large area of ​​surface land, destroy surface vegetation, damage the surface ecosystem, and cause all-round pollution to the atmosphere, water bodies (including surface and groundwater), and soil around the mining area.

[0003] At present, most existing technologies only focus on the restoration and management of open-pit mines, and rarely analyze and evaluate the effects of open-pit mine restoration and management. This makes it impossible to analyze and measure the effects of ecological restoration of open-pit mines, which easily leads to the problem of insufficient or excessive ecological restoration of mines. The only open-pit mine restoration evaluation methods comprehensively consider the evaluation effects of all indicators. The analysis process is cumbersome and complicated, and there is no analysis and evaluation of separate indicators, which is not very instructive for the improvement of ecological restoration. Moreover, the existing ecological restoration evaluation methods do not take into account the fact that the ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines is determined by the main influencing indicators, and the secondary influencing indicators have little effect on the ecological restoration effect. The analysis process is complicated and not scientific enough. Summary of the invention

[0004] The purpose of this application is to provide an open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method, equipment, storage medium and product to solve the problem that the traditional evaluation method takes all indicators into consideration, resulting in a cumbersome and complicated analysis process, and fails to analyze the sub-indicators, resulting in incomplete analysis results.

[0005] The present application solves the above technical problems through the following technical solutions: A method for evaluating the ecological restoration effect of an open-pit mine, comprising:

[0006] Determine the evaluation indicators;

[0007] Obtain the required repair quantity, actual repair quantity, actual repair quality score and weight of each evaluation indicator;

[0008] The repair effect of each evaluation indicator is calculated based on the required repair quantity, actual repair quantity and actual repair quality score of each evaluation indicator;

[0009] Determine the main and secondary indicators based on the weight of each evaluation indicator;

[0010] The basic evaluation of the effect is calculated based on the weights of each main indicator and the restoration effect, and the deviation of the effect is calculated based on the weights of each main indicator and the restoration effect, and the weights of each secondary indicator and the restoration effect;

[0011] The ecological restoration effect of the open-pit mine is evaluated based on the basic effect evaluation and the effect deviation.

[0012] Furthermore, the evaluation indicators include land management, water management, vegetation coverage, bioremediation, atmospheric environment, surface water environment, groundwater environment and soil environment;

[0013] The restoration amount of the land management is based on the land area, the restoration amount of the water body management is based on the water body volume, the restoration amount of the vegetation cover is based on the number of plants, the restoration amount of the biological restoration is based on the number of animals, the restoration amount of the atmospheric environment is based on the air volume, the restoration amount of the surface water environment is based on the surface water body area, the restoration amount of the groundwater environment is based on the groundwater body volume, and the restoration amount of the soil environment is based on the soil volume.

[0014] Furthermore, the process of obtaining the actual restoration quality score of each evaluation indicator includes:

[0015] According to the years of experience, education and professional title, the experts who participated in the evaluation of the restoration quality score of each evaluation indicator were scored, and the scores of each expert in terms of years of experience, education and professional title were obtained;

[0016] The comprehensive score of each expert is calculated based on their scores on years of experience, education and professional title;

[0017] The weight of each expert is determined based on their comprehensive score;

[0018] Obtain the restoration quality score of each expert for each evaluation indicator;

[0019] The actual restoration quality score of each evaluation indicator is calculated based on the weight of each expert and each expert's restoration quality score for each evaluation indicator.

[0020] Furthermore, the order relation analysis method or the hierarchical analysis method is used to obtain the weight of each evaluation index.

[0021] Furthermore, the calculation formula for the repair effect of each evaluation index is:

[0022]

[0023] Among them, S k represents the repair effect of the kth evaluation index, t ck represents the actual repair amount of the kth evaluation index, q ck represents the actual repair quality score of the kth evaluation indicator, t rk Indicates the required repair amount of the kth evaluation indicator.

[0024] Furthermore, the main and secondary indicators are determined according to the weight of each evaluation indicator, including:

[0025] According to the weight, sort the evaluation indicators from large to small;

[0026] When the sum of the weights of the current n evaluation indicators exceeds the set threshold, the first n evaluation indicators are used as the main indicators, and the n+1th to Nth evaluation indicators are used as secondary indicators; where N represents the number of evaluation indicators.

[0027] Furthermore, the calculation formula for the basic evaluation of the effect is:

[0028]

[0029] Among them, S b Indicates the basic evaluation of the effect, w i represents the weight of the i-th main indicator, n represents the number of main indicators, S i represents the repair effect of the i-th main indicator;

[0030] The calculation formula of the effect deviation is:

[0031]

[0032] Among them, ΔS represents the effect deviation, N represents the number of evaluation indicators, and w j represents the weight of the jth secondary indicator, S j Represents the repair effect of the jth secondary indicator.

[0033] Based on the same concept, the present application also provides an electronic device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program / instructions stored in the memory, wherein the processor executes the computer program / instructions to implement the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method as described above.

[0034] Based on the same concept, the present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium on which a computer program / instruction is stored. When the computer program / instruction is executed by a processor, the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method as described above is implemented.

[0035] Based on the same concept, the present application also provides a computer program product, including a computer program / instruction, which, when executed by a processor, implements the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method as described above.

[0036] Beneficial Effects

[0037] Compared with the prior art, the advantages of this application are:

[0038] This application not only conducts a comprehensive overall evaluation of the ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines, but also evaluates the restoration effect of each evaluation indicator. The restoration effect of each evaluation indicator has a targeted guiding role in the restoration of weak points in ecological restoration, and provides guidance for improving the ecological restoration effect economically and efficiently.

[0039] This application calculates the basic evaluation of the effect based on the main indicators, and calculates the deviation of the effect based on the main indicators and secondary indicators. It conducts a multi-dimensional, comprehensive and in-depth analysis and evaluation of the ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines from two aspects: basic evaluation of the effect and deviation of the effect. It enriches the content and level of the ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines, and the evaluation method is more scientific, comprehensive, practical and reasonable. The calculation process of this application is relatively simple, which is convenient for actual operation and execution, and solves the problem of cumbersome and complicated analysis process of traditional methods. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0040] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solution of the present application, the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only one embodiment of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative work.

[0041] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method in the embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0042] The following is a clear and complete description of the technical solutions in this application in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of this application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of this application, not all of them. Based on the embodiments in this application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0043] The technical solution of the present application is described in detail with specific embodiments below. The following specific embodiments can be combined with each other, and the same or similar concepts or processes may not be described in detail in some embodiments.

[0044] Figure 1 The flowchart of the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method provided by this application is shown. Figure 1 As shown, the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method includes the following steps:

[0045] Step 1: Determine the evaluation indicators.

[0046] According to the analysis, the evaluation indicators for the ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines include land management, water body management, vegetation coverage, biological restoration, atmospheric environment, surface water environment, groundwater environment and soil environment. Based on these 8 evaluation indicators, the ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines is evaluated.

[0047] Step 2: Obtain the required repair quantity, actual repair quantity, actual repair quality score and weight of each evaluation indicator.

[0048] In the specific implementation manner of the present application, the restoration amount of land management is based on the land area, the restoration amount of water management is based on the water volume, the restoration amount of vegetation cover is based on the number of plants, the restoration amount of bioremediation is based on the number of animals, the restoration amount of the atmospheric environment is based on the air volume, the restoration amount of the surface water environment is based on the surface water area, the restoration amount of the groundwater environment is based on the groundwater volume, and the restoration amount of the soil environment is based on the soil volume.

[0049] Taking land management as an example, the required restoration amount of land management refers to the land area that needs to be restored, and the actual restoration amount of land management refers to the land area that has been restored. Through statistics, the required restoration amount and actual restoration amount of each evaluation indicator can be obtained.

[0050] This application obtains the actual restoration quality score of each evaluation indicator based on expert evaluation. In order to improve the accuracy of the actual restoration quality score of each evaluation indicator, and then provide the rationality of the restoration effect of each evaluation indicator and the ecological restoration effect of the open-pit mine, the process of obtaining the actual restoration quality score of each evaluation indicator includes:

[0051] Step 2.1: Score the experts who participate in the restoration quality scoring of each evaluation indicator based on their years of experience, academic qualifications and professional titles, and obtain the scores of each expert in terms of years of experience, academic qualifications and professional titles.

[0052] The actual restoration quality score of each evaluation index can be obtained by the comprehensive value of multiple experts scoring on a percentage basis. Taking into account the differences in experience and academic qualifications of different experts, this application first divides the experts into levels. The basis for the expert level division is three factors that are more related to the accuracy of the score, namely, years of professional experience, academic qualifications and professional titles. The levels and scores of each expert in terms of years of professional experience, academic qualifications and professional titles are shown in Table 1.

[0053] Table 1 Expert level classification and scoring

[0054] Years of employment / year score Education score job title score ＜3 10 Below junior college 5 Below primary level 5 3～5 20 Specialist 10 primary 10 5～10 30 Undergraduate 12 intermediate 15 10～15 40 master 15 Deputy Senior 25 15～20 45 PhD 20 Senior 30 ≥20 50

[0055] In Table 1, the lower digit of the interval includes the number, while the upper digit does not include the number.

[0056] Step 2.2: Calculate the comprehensive score of each expert based on their scores in terms of years of experience, education and professional title.

[0057] The scores of each expert in terms of years of experience, education level and professional title are added up to obtain the expert's comprehensive score.

[0058] Step 2.3: Determine the weight of each expert based on their comprehensive score, as shown in Table 2.

[0059] Table 2 Experts' comprehensive scores and their weights

[0060] Expert comprehensive rating Expert Weight 90～100 1.00 80～90 0.90 70～80 0.75 60～70 0.50 50～60 0.30 40～50 0.20 30～40 0.10 20～30 0.05

[0061] In Table 2, the lower digit of the interval includes the number, the upper digit does not include the number, and the upper digit of the interval from 90 to 100 includes the number, that is, it includes 100.

[0062] Step 2.4: Obtain the restoration quality score of each expert for each evaluation indicator.

[0063] Each expert gave a positive score on a 100-point scale to the restoration quality of the eight evaluation indicators.

[0064] Step 2.5: Calculate the actual restoration quality score of each evaluation indicator based on the weight of each expert and the restoration quality score of each expert for each evaluation indicator. The specific calculation formula is:

[0065]

[0066] Among them, q ck represents the actual repair quality score of the kth evaluation indicator, v j represents the weight of the jth expert, m represents the number of experts, and x kj It represents the restoration quality score of the j-th expert for the k-th evaluation index. It is not necessarily equal to 1. Taking into account the differences in professional backgrounds required by each evaluation indicator, different expert groups may be used to evaluate different evaluation indicators.

[0067] This application fully takes into account the differences in experience and academic qualifications of different experts. When evaluating the actual restoration quality scores of the evaluation indicators, the weight of their scores in the comprehensive score is assigned according to their years of experience, academic qualifications, and professional titles, so that the calculation method of the actual restoration quality scores of each evaluation indicator is more scientific and the scoring results are more reasonable.

[0068] In the present application, the weight of each evaluation index is mainly obtained by a subjective calculation method, such as a subjective weight calculation method such as a sequential relationship analysis method (GI method) or a hierarchy analysis method (AHP method).

[0069] Step 3: Calculate the repair effect of each evaluation indicator based on the required repair quantity, actual repair quantity and actual repair quality score of each evaluation indicator.

[0070] The evaluation of the restoration effect of each evaluation index is based on the effect of the open-pit mine ecological restoration and the effect before and after restoration, and is evaluated from two aspects: restoration quantity and restoration quality. In this embodiment, the calculation formula of the restoration effect of each evaluation index is:

[0071]

[0072] Among them, S k represents the repair effect of the kth evaluation index, t ck represents the actual repair amount of the kth evaluation index, q ck represents the actual repair quality score of the kth evaluation indicator, t rk The repair effect S of each evaluation index is k Or basic evaluation of effect S b The evaluation levels are shown in Table 3.

[0073] Represents the restoration effect S of the three evaluation indicators k Or basic evaluation of effect S b Evaluation form

[0074] <![CDATA[S k or S b ]]> level Comments 0～0.4 Ⅴ Very poor repair effect 0.4～0.6 Ⅳ Poor repair effect 0.6～0.8 Ⅲ Repair effect is average 0.8～0.9 Ⅱ Good repair effect 0.9～1.0 Ⅰ Excellent repair effect

[0075] In Table 3, the lower digit of the interval includes the number, the upper digit does not include the number, and the upper digit of the interval from 0.9 to 1.0 includes the number.

[0076] Step 4: Determine the primary and secondary indicators based on the weights of each evaluation indicator.

[0077] Considering the philosophical thought of evaluating the ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines, the ecological restoration effect is evaluated with main indicators, and the main contradictions of things are grasped. The evaluation method is more in line with philosophical thought and more scientific. Therefore, each evaluation indicator is divided into a main indicator and a secondary indicator, and the primary and secondary division of each evaluation indicator is determined by the weight of each evaluation indicator. In the specific implementation of this application, the main indicator and the secondary indicator are determined according to the weight of each evaluation indicator, including:

[0078] Step 4.1: Sort the evaluation indicators from large to small according to their weights;

[0079] Step 4.2: When the sum of the weights of the current n evaluation indicators exceeds the set threshold, the previous n evaluation indicators are used as the primary indicators, and the n+1th to Nth evaluation indicators are used as secondary indicators; where N represents the number of evaluation indicators. In this embodiment, N=8, and the threshold is set to 0.8.

[0080] Step 5: Calculate the basic evaluation of the effect based on the weights and restoration effects of each main indicator, and calculate the effect deviation based on the weights and restoration effects of each main indicator and the weights and restoration effects of each secondary indicator.

[0081] In this embodiment, the calculation formula for the basic evaluation of the effect is:

[0082]

[0083] Among them, S b Indicates the basic evaluation of the effect, w i represents the weight of the i-th main indicator, n represents the number of main indicators, S i Represents the repair effect of the i-th main indicator.

[0084] In this embodiment, the calculation formula of effect deviation is:

[0085]

[0086] Among them, ΔS represents the effect deviation, N represents the number of evaluation indicators, and w j represents the weight of the jth secondary indicator, S j It represents the repair effect of the jth secondary indicator. The evaluation level of effect deviation is shown in Table 4.

[0087] Table 4 Effect Deviation Evaluation Table

[0088] ΔS level Comments 0.2 and above Ⅲ Large deviation, unreliable results 0.1～0.2 Ⅱ The deviation is moderate and the results are relatively reliable 0～0.1 Ⅰ Small deviation, reliable results

[0089] In Table 4, the lower digit of the interval includes the number, while the upper digit does not include the number.

[0090] Step 6: Evaluate the ecological restoration effect of the open-pit mine based on the basic evaluation and effect deviation.

[0091] The ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines is determined by the basic evaluation of the effect and the effect deviation. The grade evaluation of the ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines is shown in Table 5.

[0092] Table 5 Evaluation table of ecological restoration effects of open-pit mines

[0093]

[0094] The evaluation level of the ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines is divided into grades I to V from excellent with small deviation to extremely poor with large deviation; the basic evaluation of the ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines is divided into grades I to V from good to poor; the deviation of the ecological restoration effect is divided into grades I to III from small deviation and reliable results to large deviation and unreliable results. The ecological restoration effect of open-pit mines is analyzed and evaluated in a multi-dimensional, comprehensive and in-depth manner from the two aspects of basic effect evaluation and effect deviation (or reliability), and the analysis and evaluation process is more scientific.

[0095] Example 2

[0096] Taking the ecological restoration effect evaluation of a certain mine as an example, the required restoration amounts of land management, water management, vegetation coverage, biological restoration, atmospheric environment, surface water environment, groundwater environment, and soil environment before ecological restoration and the actual restoration amounts after ecological restoration were statistically analyzed, as shown in Table 6.

[0097] Table 6 Required repair quantity and actual repair quantity of each evaluation index

[0098]

[0099] Five experts were invited to give restoration quality scores for land management, water management, vegetation cover, bioremediation, atmospheric environment, surface water environment, groundwater environment, and soil environment, as shown in Table 7.

[0100] Table 7 Restoration quality scores of each evaluation index

[0101]

[0102] Taking the calculation of the restoration effect of land management as an example, the weight of each expert is obtained according to the scores of the five experts in terms of years of experience, education and professional title. Combined with the restoration quality scores of land management given by each expert in Table 7, it can be seen that:

[0103] The weight of expert 1 is 0.75, and the restoration quality score of land management is 83; the weight of expert 2 is 0.50, and the restoration quality score of land management is 79; the weight of expert 3 is 0.75, and the restoration quality score of land management is 81; the weight of expert 4 is 0.90, and the restoration quality score of land management is 83; the weight of expert 5 is 0.50, and the restoration quality score of land management is 82. According to formula (1), the actual restoration quality score of land management is:

[0104] q c1 =(0.75×83+0.50×79+0.75×81+0.90×83+0.50×82) / (0.75+0.50+0.75+0.90+0.50)(5)

[0105] =278.2 / 3.4=81.8

[0106] Similarly, the actual restoration quality scores of other evaluation indicators were: 79.4 for water body management; 89.4 for vegetation coverage; 90.8 for surface water environment; 72.8 for biological restoration; 80.8 for groundwater environment; 79.4 for soil environment; and 83.0 for atmospheric environment.

[0107] According to Table 6 and formula (2), the restoration effect of each evaluation index can be obtained as follows:

[0108] The restoration effect of land management S1 = (32500 / 36800) × (81.8 / 100) = 0.72;

[0109] The restoration effect of water treatment S2 = (105000 / 120000) × (79.4 / 100) = 0.69;

[0110] The restoration effect of vegetation cover S3 = (920 / 1380) × (89.4 / 100) = 0.60;

[0111] The restoration effect of surface water environment S4 = (11500 / 14000) × (90.8 / 100) = 0.75;

[0112] The repair effect of bioremediation S5 = (245 / 320) × (72.8 / 100) = 0.56;

[0113] The restoration effect of groundwater environment S6 = (52000 / 98000) × (80.8 / 100) = 0.43;

[0114] The restoration effect of soil environment S7 = (2600000 / 3200000) × (79.4 / 100) = 0.65;

[0115] The restoration effect of the atmospheric environment is S8 = (2700000 / 3600000) × (83.0 / 100) = 0.62.

[0116] According to Table 3, the evaluation grade of the ecological restoration effect of land management, water management, vegetation coverage, surface water environment, soil environment and atmospheric environment is Level III, that is, the restoration effects of these indicators are general; while the evaluation grade of the ecological restoration effect of biological restoration and groundwater environment is Level IV, that is, the restoration effects of these indicators are poor.

[0117] Subjective weights were calculated for land management, water management, vegetation coverage, bioremediation, atmospheric environment, surface water environment, groundwater environment, and soil environment, and the results showed that the weight of land management was 0.19, the weight of water management was 0.16, the weight of vegetation coverage was 0.13, the weight of bioremediation was 0.11, the weight of atmospheric environment was 0.08, the weight of surface water environment was 0.12, the weight of groundwater environment was 0.11, and the weight of soil environment was 0.10.

[0118] The evaluation indicators are ranked from large to small: the land management weight w1 is 0.19, the water management weight w2 is 0.16, the vegetation coverage weight w3 is 0.13, the surface water environment weight w4 is 0.12, the bioremediation weight w5 is 0.11, the groundwater environment weight w6 is 0.11, the soil environment weight w7 is 0.10, and the atmospheric environment weight w8 is 0.08.

[0119]

[0120] Therefore, land management, water management, vegetation cover, surface water environment, biological restoration, and groundwater environment are the main indicators, and soil environment and atmospheric environment are secondary indicators.

[0121] According to formula (3), the basic evaluation of effect S can be obtained. b for:

[0122]

[0123] According to Table 3, the basic evaluation of the ecological restoration effect of the open-pit mine in this embodiment is S b It is level IV, that is, the ecological restoration effect is poor. According to formula (4), the effect deviation ΔS is:

[0124]

[0125] According to Table 4, the effect deviation ΔS of the open-pit mine ecological restoration in this embodiment is level II, that is, the deviation is general and the result is relatively reliable. b It is grade IV, the effect deviation ΔS is grade II and Table 5 shows that the comprehensive evaluation grade S of the ecological restoration effect of the open-pit mine ecological restoration in this embodiment is a It is level IV, that is, the ecological restoration effect is poor, and the results are relatively reliable. According to the evaluation results, the ecological restoration effect of the open-pit mine in this embodiment is poor, and the results are reliable, and the ecological restoration effect needs to be further improved for a second time; according to the ecological restoration effects of each evaluation indicator, the ecological restoration effects of biological restoration and groundwater environment are poor, which are indicators that need to be improved.

[0126] Example 3

[0127] An embodiment of the present application also provides an electronic device, which includes: a memory, a processor, and a computer program / instructions stored in the memory, and the processor executes the computer program / instructions to implement the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method in the embodiment of the present application.

[0128] Although not shown, the electronic device includes a processor, which can perform various appropriate operations and processes according to the program and / or data stored in the read-only memory (ROM) or the program and / or data loaded from the storage portion into the random access memory (RAM). The processor can be a multi-core processor, or it can include multiple processors. In some embodiments, the processor can include a general main processor and one or more special coprocessors, such as a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit (GPU), a neural network processor (NPU), a digital signal processor (DSP), etc. In RAM, various programs and data required for device operation are also stored. The processor, ROM and RAM are connected to each other via a bus. The input / output (I / O) interface is also connected to the bus.

[0129] The processor and memory are used together to execute the program / instructions stored in the memory. When the program / instructions are executed by the computer, the methods, steps or functions described in the above embodiments can be implemented.

[0130] Although not shown, the embodiment of the present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium on which a computer program / instruction is stored. When the computer program / instruction is executed by a processor, the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method in the embodiment of the present application is implemented.

[0131] Readable storage media include permanent and non-permanent, removable and non-removable media that can be implemented by any method or technology to store information. Information can be computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), other types of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, disk storage or other magnetic storage devices or any other non-transmission media that can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. As defined herein, computer-readable media does not include temporary computer-readable media (transitory media), such as modulated data signals and carrier waves.

[0132] Although not shown, the embodiment of the present application also provides a computer program product, including: a computer program / instruction, which, when executed by a processor, implements the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method in the embodiment of the present application.

[0133] The above disclosure is only a specific implementation method of the present application, but the protection scope of the present application is not limited thereto. Any technician familiar with the technical field can easily think of changes or modifications within the technical scope disclosed in the present application, which should be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the ecological restoration effect of an open-pit mine, characterized in that: The evaluation method includes: Determine the evaluation indicators; Obtain the required repair quantity, actual repair quantity, actual repair quality score and weight of each evaluation indicator; The repair effect of each evaluation indicator is calculated based on the required repair quantity, actual repair quantity and actual repair quality score of each evaluation indicator; Determine the main and secondary indicators based on the weight of each evaluation indicator; The basic evaluation of the effect is calculated based on the weights of each main indicator and the restoration effect, and the deviation of the effect is calculated based on the weights of each main indicator and the restoration effect, and the weights of each secondary indicator and the restoration effect; The ecological restoration effect of the open-pit mine is evaluated based on the basic effect evaluation and the effect deviation.

2. The open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation indicators include land management, water management, vegetation coverage, bioremediation, atmospheric environment, surface water environment, groundwater environment and soil environment; The restoration amount of the land management is based on the land area, the restoration amount of the water body management is based on the water body volume, the restoration amount of the vegetation cover is based on the number of plants, the restoration amount of the biological restoration is based on the number of animals, the restoration amount of the atmospheric environment is based on the air volume, the restoration amount of the surface water environment is based on the surface water body area, the restoration amount of the groundwater environment is based on the groundwater body volume, and the restoration amount of the soil environment is based on the soil volume.

3. The open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The process of obtaining the actual restoration quality score of each evaluation indicator includes: According to the years of experience, education and professional title, the experts who participated in the evaluation of the restoration quality score of each evaluation indicator were scored, and the scores of each expert in terms of years of experience, education and professional title were obtained; The comprehensive score of each expert is calculated based on their scores on years of experience, education and professional title; The weight of each expert is determined based on their comprehensive score; Obtain the restoration quality score of each expert for each evaluation indicator; The actual restoration quality score of each evaluation indicator is calculated based on the weight of each expert and each expert's restoration quality score for each evaluation indicator.

4. The open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The weight of each evaluation index is obtained by using the ordinal relation analysis method or the hierarchical analysis method.

5. The open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The calculation formula of the repair effect of each evaluation index is: Among them, S k represents the repair effect of the kth evaluation index, t ck represents the actual repair amount of the kth evaluation index, q ck represents the actual repair quality score of the kth evaluation indicator, t rk Indicates the required repair amount of the kth evaluation indicator.

6. The open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The main and secondary indicators are determined according to the weight of each evaluation indicator, including: According to the weight, sort the evaluation indicators from large to small; When the sum of the weights of the current n evaluation indicators exceeds the set threshold, the first n evaluation indicators are used as the main indicators, and the n+1th to Nth evaluation indicators are used as secondary indicators; where N represents the number of evaluation indicators.

7. The method for evaluating the ecological restoration effect of an open-pit mine according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that: The calculation formula for the basic evaluation of the effect is: Among them, S b Indicates the basic evaluation of the effect, w i represents the weight of the i-th main indicator, n represents the number of main indicators, S i represents the repair effect of the i-th main indicator; The calculation formula of the effect deviation is: Among them, ΔS represents the effect deviation, N represents the number of evaluation indicators, and w j represents the weight of the jth secondary indicator, S j Represents the repair effect of the jth secondary indicator.

8. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program / instruction stored in the memory, characterized in that: The processor executes the computer program / instructions to implement the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program / instruction stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program / instruction is executed by a processor, the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 is implemented.

10. A computer program product comprising a computer program / instructions, characterized in that When the computer program / instruction is executed by a processor, the open-pit mine ecological restoration effect evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 is implemented.

Images