A method for realizing control and management separation of knitting control platform

Abstract

The present invention provides a method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform, which belongs to the field of data processing technology, and specifically comprises: dividing the data interaction requirements of the knitting control platform to obtain control requirements and management requirements, and performing allocation processing of processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements based on the compatible data between processors of different control targets and the processor of the knitting control platform to obtain control processors and management processors, obtaining historical data interaction between independent control requirements and underwear looms, and performing allocation processing of processors of independent control requirements in combination with the association between independent control requirements under different business types to obtain allocation processors, and performing data interaction based on a real-time interaction strategy between the allocation processor and the management processor, thereby improving the real-time performance of underwear loom control.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of data processing, and in particular relates to a method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform. Background Art

[0002] During the operation of underwear looms, there are requirements for real-time operation control and operation management. In the existing technical solution, CN201310195970.7 "A two-level control system of microprocessor / field programmable gate array for blood analyzer" sets up a two-level control system, so that different systems perform their respective functions and work together, which improves the real-time performance, flexibility and reliability of the system, and realizes the segmented adjustment control of different dimensional requirements. However, there are the following technical problems:

[0003] Although existing similar technical solutions perform their respective functions and work in collaboration, they are more about achieving tasks between the various parts of a single control system. With the development of the underwear industry for more than 20 years, it has evolved from single machine operation control and simple interface display to customers having higher requirements for the human-machine interaction experience of the machine itself, and at the same time, it is developing in the direction of digital workshop management and even data management of the entire underwear industry. Therefore, in addition to meeting control needs, the knitting control platform also undertakes more other management work. If the control business process and the management business process are managed in a unified manner, it will inevitably lead to a decrease in the real-time performance of the control system business process, and the diversity of the management process will be affected by the real-time requirements of the control process, resulting in a decrease in the experience, which makes it impossible for different business flows to better meet the development needs of the industry.

[0004] In response to the above technical problems, the present application specifically provides a method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform. Summary of the invention

[0005] To achieve the purpose of the present invention, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:

[0006] According to one aspect of the present invention, a method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform is provided.

[0007] A method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform, specifically comprising:

[0008] S1 divides the data interaction requirements of the knitting control platform into control requirements and management requirements, and allocates processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements based on the compatible data between the processors of different underwear looms and the processor of the knitting control platform to obtain control processors and management processors;

[0009] S2 obtains the historical data interaction between the knitting control platform and the underwear loom under different control requirements, and when it is determined by using the historical data interaction that the real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to control the data interaction between the processor and the management processor, proceeds to the next step;

[0010] S3 determines the control demand using a real-time interaction strategy based on the historical interaction data of the control demand and management demand of different underwear looms under different business types, and treats it as an independent control demand;

[0011] S4 obtains the historical data interaction between independent control requirements and underwear looms, and allocates processors of independent control requirements based on the association between independent control requirements under different business types to obtain allocation processors, and adopts real-time interaction strategies between the allocation processors and the management processors for data interaction.

[0012] The beneficial effects of the present invention are:

[0013] The historical data interaction situation is used to determine whether a real-time interaction strategy can be adopted to perform data interaction between the control processor and the management processor, thereby avoiding the technical problem that real-time data interaction between the control processor and the management processor cannot be performed due to frequent interaction between the control processor and the underwear loom, improving the efficiency and real-time performance of the control processor in controlling the underwear loom, and also avoiding the delay effect of the data interaction between the control processor and the management processor on the control processor.

[0014] Based on the real-time interaction strategy used between the allocation processor and the management processor for data interaction, the real-time data requirements of the control requirements that require real-time data interaction are realized. At the same time, through the determination of the allocation processor, the influence of the control requirements that require real-time data interaction on other control requirements during data interaction is avoided. On the basis of realizing the control and management separation, the real-time and reliability of the system processing are further improved.

[0015] A further technical solution is to divide the control requirements and management requirements, including:

[0016] Based on the types of data interaction requirements between the underwear loom and the knitting control platform, the data interaction requirements are divided into control requirements and management requirements.

[0017] A further technical solution is that the compatibility data is determined based on historical compatibility fault data between the processor of the knitting control platform and the processor of the underwear loom under a corresponding interaction protocol type.

[0018] A further technical solution is to perform allocation processing of processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements, specifically including:

[0019] Based on the compatibility data between the processor of the underwear loom and the processor of the knitting control platform, determining historical compatibility fault data between different processors of the underwear loom and the processor of the knitting control platform;

[0020] Determining the number of historical compatibility failures with processors of different underwear looms according to historical compatibility failure data with processors of different underwear looms, and determining the total number of historical compatibility failures according to the number of historical compatibility failures;

[0021] The processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements are allocated based on the total number of historical compatibility failures.

[0022] A further technical solution is to perform allocation processing of processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements based on the total number of historical compatibility failures, specifically including:

[0023] The processor with the least total number of historical compatible failures is used as the processor corresponding to the control demand;

[0024] The processor with the least total number of historical compatible failures, excluding the processor corresponding to the control requirement, is used as the processor corresponding to the management requirement.

[0025] A further technical solution is that the method for determining the control demand using the real-time interaction strategy is:

[0026] Based on the historical interaction data of control demand and management demand under different business types, the historical interaction times of control demand and management demand under different business types of different underwear looms are determined;

[0027] Determine the total number of historical interactions according to the number of historical interactions between control requirements and management requirements under different business types, and determine the busy interaction underwear loom among the underwear looms by using the total number of historical interactions;

[0028] Whether the control demand is a control demand adopting a real-time interaction strategy is determined according to the number of the busy interactive underwear looms.

[0029] A further technical solution is that, when the number of the busy interactive underwear looms is greater than the preset number of looms, the control demand is determined to be a control demand using a real-time interactive strategy.

[0030] In a second aspect, the present application provides a knitting control platform, which adopts the above-mentioned method for implementing control separation of a knitting control platform, specifically including:

[0031] Control processor, management processor, data interaction interface;

[0032] The control processor is used for data processing for control needs, the management processor is responsible for data processing for management needs, and the data interaction interface is used for data interaction between the control processor and the management processor.

[0033] Other features and advantages will be described in the following description. The objects and other advantages of the present invention are realized and obtained by the structures particularly pointed out in the description and drawings.

[0034] In order to make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, preferred embodiments are given below and described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0035] The above and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by describing in detail exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings;

[0036] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of a method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform;

[0037] Figure 2 It is a flowchart for allocating processors corresponding to control requirements and management requirements;

[0038] Figure 3 is a flow chart for determining that a real-time interaction strategy cannot be used for data interaction between a control processor and a management processor;

[0039] Figure 4 is a flow chart of a method for determining an interactive busy unit time period;

[0040] Figure 5 is a flow chart of a method for determining control requirements using a real-time interaction strategy. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0041] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in this specification, the technical solutions in the embodiments of this specification will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of this specification. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of this specification, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this specification, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work should fall within the scope of protection of this specification.

[0042] In the process of controlling and managing underwear looms through a knitting control platform, if the control business process and the management business process are managed in a unified manner, it will inevitably lead to a higher degree of complexity in the data processing of the processor. Therefore, it is necessary to allocate and process the processors corresponding to the control requirements and the management requirements to obtain the control processor and the management processor.

[0043] Perform allocation processing of processors corresponding to control requirements and management requirements: use the processor of the knitting control platform with the least compatibility issues with processors of different underwear looms as the control processor, and use the processor of the knitting control platform with the second least compatibility issues with processors of different underwear looms as the management processor.

[0044] Determine that a real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to control data interaction between the processor and the management processor: determine the busy period of data interaction based on the number of data interactions between the control processor and the management processor in different time periods, and use the proportion of the number of busy periods of data interaction to determine whether a real-time interaction strategy needs to be used to control data interaction between the processor and the management processor. When the proportion of the number of busy periods of data interaction is greater than 0.3, it is determined that a real-time interaction strategy needs to be used to control data interaction between the processor and the management processor.

[0045] Independent control demand: Use the historical interaction data of control demand and management demand under different business types to determine the historical interaction times of control demand and management demand for different underwear looms under different business types, determine the total historical interaction times based on the historical interaction times of control demand and management demand under different business types, and use the total historical interaction times to determine the busy interactive underwear looms among the underwear looms, determine whether the control demand is a control demand that adopts a real-time interaction strategy through the proportion of busy interactive underwear looms, and define the control demand when the proportion of busy interactive underwear looms is greater than 0.2 as an independent control demand.

[0046] Allocation processing of the allocation processor: determine the business types in which other independent control requirements are associated with the independent control requirements based on the association between the other independent control requirements and the independent control requirements under different business types, and use them as associated business types, and divide the other independent control requirements with the most associated business types into the same allocation processor.

[0047] To solve the above problems, according to one aspect of the present invention, Figure 1 As shown, a first aspect is provided, and the present invention provides a method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform, specifically comprising:

[0048] S1 divides the data interaction requirements of the knitting control platform into control requirements and management requirements, and allocates processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements based on the compatible data between the processors of different underwear looms and the processor of the knitting control platform to obtain control processors and management processors;

[0049] Further, the control requirements and management requirements are divided, including:

[0050] Based on the types of data interaction requirements between the underwear loom and the knitting control platform, the data interaction requirements are divided into control requirements and management requirements.

[0051] Specifically, the compatibility data is determined based on historical compatibility failure data between the processor of the knitting control platform and the processor of the underwear loom under the corresponding interaction protocol type.

[0052] Optionally, if Figure 2 As shown, the allocation processing of the processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements specifically includes:

[0053] Based on the compatibility data between the processor of the underwear loom and the processor of the knitting control platform, determining historical compatibility fault data between different processors of the underwear loom and the processor of the knitting control platform;

[0054] Determining the number of historical compatibility failures with processors of different underwear looms according to historical compatibility failure data with processors of different underwear looms, and determining the total number of historical compatibility failures according to the number of historical compatibility failures;

[0055] The processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements are allocated based on the total number of historical compatibility failures.

[0056] Further, the allocation processing of the processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements is performed based on the total number of historical compatibility failures, specifically including:

[0057] The processor with the least total number of historical compatible failures is used as the processor corresponding to the control demand;

[0058] The processor with the least total number of historical compatible failures, excluding the processor corresponding to the control requirement, is used as the processor corresponding to the management requirement.

[0059] Optionally, performing allocation processing of processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements specifically includes:

[0060] Based on the compatibility data between the processor of the underwear loom and the processor of the knitting control platform, determining historical compatibility fault data between different processors of the underwear loom and the processor of the knitting control platform;

[0061] Determine the number of historical compatibility failures with processors of different underwear looms according to historical compatibility failure data with processors of different underwear looms, and determine the control weight coefficient and management weight coefficient with processors of different underwear looms according to the number of data interactions with processors of different underwear looms in the control requirements and management requirements;

[0062] The total number of control failures and the total number of management failures of the processor of the knitting control platform are determined based on the historical compatible failure times, the control weight coefficient and the management weight coefficient, and the control requirements and the processors corresponding to the management requirements are allocated and processed according to the total number of control failures and the total number of management failures.

[0063] Furthermore, the total number of control failures is determined based on the product of the historical compatibility failure number and the control weight coefficient, and the total number of management failures is determined based on the product of the historical compatibility failure number and the management weight coefficient.

[0064] Specifically, the processor with the smallest total number of control faults is used as the processor corresponding to the control requirement, and the processor with the smallest total number of management faults other than the processor corresponding to the control requirement is used as the processor corresponding to the management requirement.

[0065] Optionally, performing allocation processing of processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements specifically includes:

[0066] S11 determines historical compatibility fault data of different processors of the underwear loom and the processor of the knitting control platform based on the compatibility data of the processor of the underwear loom and the processor of the knitting control platform;

[0067] S12: determining the number of historical compatibility failures with processors of different underwear looms according to historical compatibility failure data with processors of different underwear looms, and determining the compatibility anomaly coefficients with processors of different underwear looms based on the compatibility failure types with processors of different underwear looms and the number of historical compatibility failures of different compatibility failure types;

[0068] Optionally, the above step S12 includes the following contents:

[0069] S121 determines the number of historical compatible failures of the processors of different underwear looms according to the historical compatible failure data of the processors of different underwear looms. When there is an underwear loom whose number of historical compatible failures does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the processor of the knitting control platform does not belong to the processor corresponding to the control requirements and the management requirements. When there is no underwear loom whose number of historical compatible failures does not meet the requirements, the process proceeds to step S122.

[0070] S122 determines the total number of historical compatible failures using the number of historical compatible failures of processors of different underwear looms. When the total number of historical compatible failures does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the processor of the knitting control platform does not belong to the processor corresponding to the control requirement and the management requirement. When the total number of historical compatible failures meets the requirement, the process proceeds to step S123.

[0071] S123 determines the compatibility anomaly coefficients of processors of different underwear looms based on the compatibility anomaly types of processors of different underwear looms and the historical compatibility anomaly times of different compatibility anomaly types. When there is an underwear loom whose compatibility anomaly coefficient does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the processor of the knitting control platform does not belong to the processor corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements. When there is no underwear loom whose compatibility anomaly coefficient does not meet the requirements, proceed to step S13.

[0072] S13 determines the control weight coefficient and the management weight coefficient of the processors of different underwear looms by using the data interaction times of the control requirements and the management requirements with the processors of different underwear looms, and determines the control fault abnormality coefficient and the management fault abnormality coefficient of the processor of the knitting control platform based on the compatibility abnormality coefficient, the control weight coefficient and the management weight coefficient;

[0073] Optionally, the above step S13 includes the following contents:

[0074] S131 determines the control weight coefficient and the management weight coefficient of the processors of different underwear looms by using the data interaction times of the control requirements and the management requirements with the processors of different underwear looms, and determines the control abnormality coefficient and the management abnormality coefficient of the processors of different underwear looms in combination with the compatible abnormality coefficient;

[0075] S132: when there is an underwear loom whose control abnormality coefficient or management abnormality coefficient does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the processor of the knitting control platform does not belong to the processor corresponding to the control requirement and the management requirement; when there is no underwear loom whose control abnormality coefficient or management abnormality coefficient does not meet the requirements, the process proceeds to step S133;

[0076] S133 determines the interaction abnormality coefficients with different underwear looms based on the average values ​​of the control abnormality coefficients and the management abnormality coefficients with different underwear looms, and when the number of underwear looms not within the preset abnormality coefficient interval meets the requirement, proceeds to step S134, and when the number of underwear looms not within the preset abnormality coefficient interval does not meet the requirement, determines that the processor of the knitting control platform does not belong to the processor corresponding to the control requirement and the management requirement;

[0077] S134 determines the control fault abnormality coefficient and the management fault abnormality coefficient of the processor of the knitting control platform based on the compatible abnormality coefficient, the control weight coefficient and the management weight coefficient, and proceeds to step S14.

[0078] S14 performs allocation processing of processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements according to the control fault abnormality coefficient and the management fault abnormality coefficient.

[0079] S2 obtains the historical data interaction between the knitting control platform and the underwear loom under different control requirements, and when it is determined by using the historical data interaction that the real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to control the data interaction between the processor and the management processor, proceeds to the next step;

[0080] Furthermore, the historical data interaction situation is based on the data interaction frequency between the knitting control platform and the underwear loom under different control requirements.

[0081] Specifically, Figure 3 As shown, it is determined that the real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to control the data interaction between the processor and the management processor, specifically including:

[0082] Based on the historical data interaction between the knitting control platform and the underwear loom under different control requirements, the number of historical data interactions of the control requirements in different time periods is determined;

[0083] Determine a busy interaction period in the time period according to the number of historical data interactions of control requirements in different time periods;

[0084] Whether to adopt a real-time interaction strategy to perform data interaction between the control processor and the management processor is determined based on the number of the interaction busy periods.

[0085] Furthermore, the busy interaction period is a period during which the number of historical data interactions is greater than a preset interaction number threshold.

[0086] It should also be noted that when the number of the busy interaction periods does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to perform data interaction between the control processor and the management processor.

[0087] Optionally, determining that a real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to interact data between the control processor and the management processor includes:

[0088] Based on the historical data interaction between the knitting control platform and the underwear loom under different control requirements, the number of historical data interactions of control requirements in different time periods is determined;

[0089] According to the number of historical data interactions of control requirements in different time periods, an average number of historical data interactions of control requirements in different time periods is determined, and the average number of interactions is used as the average number of interactions;

[0090] Based on the average number of interactions, it is determined whether to adopt a real-time interaction strategy to perform data interaction between the control processor and the management processor.

[0091] Optionally, determining that a real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to interact data between the control processor and the management processor includes:

[0092] S21 determines the number of historical data interactions of control requirements in different time periods based on the historical data interactions between the knitting control platform and the underwear loom under different control requirements, and determines the busy interaction period in different time periods according to the number of historical data interactions of control requirements in different time periods;

[0093] S22 determines the frequent interaction unit time periods in different unit time periods by using the distribution data of the busy interaction time periods in different unit time periods and the historical interaction times of the frequent interaction time periods;

[0094] S23 determines whether to adopt a real-time interaction strategy to perform data interaction between the control processor and the management processor based on the number of the frequent interaction unit time periods.

[0095] Specifically, Figure 4 As shown, the method for determining the interactive busy unit period is:

[0096] Determine the proportion of busy periods by using the proportion of frequent interaction periods in the unit period;

[0097] Determine the frequency coefficient of different frequent interaction periods by using the ratio of the historical interaction times of different frequent interaction periods in the unit time period to the preset interaction times;

[0098] The period busy coefficient of the unit period is determined according to the product of the average value of the frequency coefficient and the proportion of the number of busy periods, and the interactive busy unit period in the unit period is determined according to the period busy coefficient.

[0099] Optionally, the above step S21 includes the following contents:

[0100] S211 determines the number of historical data interactions of the control requirements in different time periods based on the historical data interactions between the knitting control platform and the underwear loom under different control requirements. When the average number of historical data interactions of the control requirements in different time periods does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to perform data interaction between the control processor and the management processor. When the average number of historical data interactions of the control requirements in different time periods meets the requirements, the process proceeds to step S212.

[0101] When it is determined in step S212 that there is a busy interaction period according to the number of historical data interactions of control requirements in different time periods, the process proceeds to step S213. When there is no busy interaction period, it is determined that a real-time interaction strategy can be used for data interaction between the control processor and the management processor.

[0102] S213 obtains the number of the busy interaction periods. When the number of the busy interaction periods does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to control the data interaction between the processor and the management processor. When the number of the busy interaction periods meets the requirement, proceed to step S22.

[0103] Optionally, the above step S22 includes the following contents:

[0104] S221 determines the unit time period where the interactive busy time period exists based on the distribution data of the interactive busy time periods in different unit time periods, and uses it as the screening unit time period. When the number of the screening unit time periods is within the preset unit time period number interval, the process proceeds to step S222; when the number of the screening unit time periods is not within the preset unit time period number interval, the process proceeds to step S223;

[0105] S222: When the total number of historical interactions of different screening unit time periods is within the preset interaction number interval, it is determined that the real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to control the data interaction between the processor and the management processor. When there is a screening unit time period that is not within the preset interaction number interval, the process proceeds to step S224.

[0106] S223: When the number of the screening unit time periods does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to perform data interaction between the control processor and the management processor. When the number of the screening unit time periods meets the requirement, the process proceeds to step S224.

[0107] S224 determines the frequent interaction unit time periods in different unit time periods by using the distribution data of the busy interaction time periods in different unit time periods and the historical interaction times in different frequent interaction time periods, and then proceeds to step S23.

[0108] S3 determines the control demand using a real-time interaction strategy based on the historical interaction data of the control demand and management demand of different underwear looms under different business types, and treats it as an independent control demand;

[0109] Specifically, Figure 5 As shown, the method for determining the control demand using the real-time interaction strategy is:

[0110] Based on the historical interaction data of control demand and management demand under different business types, the historical interaction times of control demand and management demand under different business types of different underwear looms are determined;

[0111] Determine the total number of historical interactions according to the number of historical interactions between control requirements and management requirements under different business types, and determine the busy interaction underwear loom among the underwear looms by using the total number of historical interactions;

[0112] Whether the control demand is a control demand adopting a real-time interaction strategy is determined according to the number of the busy interactive underwear looms.

[0113] Further, when the number of the busy interactive underwear looms is greater than the preset number of looms, it is determined that the control demand is a control demand using a real-time interactive strategy.

[0114] In another embodiment, the method for determining the control demand using the real-time interaction strategy is:

[0115] The historical interaction data of control demand and management demand under different business types are used to determine the historical interaction times of control demand and management demand of different underwear looms under different business types, and when there are underwear looms whose historical interaction times do not meet the requirements under different business types, combined with the preset interaction times threshold, it is determined:

[0116] The number of underwear looms whose historical interaction times do not meet the requirements under different business types is obtained. When there is a business type in which the number of underwear looms whose historical interaction times do not meet the requirements is greater than a preset underwear loom number threshold, it is determined that the control demand is a control demand using a real-time interaction strategy.

[0117] If there is no business type whose historical interaction times do not meet the requirements and the number of underwear looms is greater than the preset underwear loom number threshold:

[0118] Determine the business processing abnormality coefficients of different business types according to the number of underwear looms whose historical interaction times do not meet the requirements in different business types, and when the sum of the business processing abnormality coefficients of different business types does not meet the requirements, determine that the control demand is a control demand using a real-time interaction strategy;

[0119] When it is determined that the number of historical interactions with different underwear looms under different business types meets the requirements or the sum of the business processing exception coefficients of different business types meets the requirements:

[0120] The total number of historical interactions is determined according to the number of historical interactions between the control demand and the management demand under different business types. When it is determined by using the total number of historical interactions that there is no busy interactive underwear loom in the underwear loom, it is determined that the control demand does not belong to the control demand using the real-time interaction strategy;

[0121] When determining that there is a busy interaction underwear loom in the underwear loom by using the total number of historical interactions:

[0122] When the number of the busy interactive underwear looms does not meet the requirement, determining that the control requirement is a control requirement using a real-time interactive strategy;

[0123] When the number of busy interactive underwear looms meets the requirement:

[0124] The loom interaction frequency coefficient is determined by the total number of historical interactions of different busy interactive underwear looms, and the loom interaction frequency coefficient is used to determine whether the control demand is a control demand adopting a real-time interaction strategy.

[0125] S4 obtains the historical data interaction between independent control requirements and underwear looms, and allocates processors of independent control requirements based on the association between independent control requirements under different business types to obtain allocation processors, and adopts real-time interaction strategies between the allocation processors and the management processors for data interaction.

[0126] Specifically, the allocation process of the processors with independent control requirements to obtain the allocated processors specifically includes:

[0127] Based on the association between other independent control requirements and the independent control requirement under different business types, determine the business type in which the other independent control requirements are associated with the independent control requirement, and use it as the associated business type;

[0128] When the other independent control requirements and the independent control requirement do not have an associated service type, the other independent control requirements and the independent control requirement are not allocated to the same allocation processor;

[0129] When the other independent control requirements have an associated service type with the independent control requirement:

[0130] and determining the interaction frequency coefficient of other independent control requirements by using the ratio of the data volume of the interaction between other independent control requirements and the historical data of the underwear loom to the preset data volume; when the interaction frequency coefficient of the other independent control requirements is greater than the preset frequency coefficient threshold, the other independent control requirements and the independent control requirements are not divided into the same allocation processor;

[0131] When the interaction frequency coefficient of the other independent control requirements is not greater than the preset frequency coefficient threshold:

[0132] Determine the correlation coefficient between other independent control requirements and the independent control requirement according to the number of associated business types, determine the comprehensive correlation coefficient of the other independent control requirements by the average value of the interaction frequency coefficient and the correlation coefficient, and use the comprehensive correlation coefficient to determine the screening control requirements among the other independent control requirements;

[0133] The screening control request and the independent control request are assigned to a same assignment processor.

[0134] Furthermore, the method for determining the screening control requirements is:

[0135] By using the comprehensive correlation coefficients between other independent control requirements and different independent control requirements, the other independent control requirements are divided into allocation processors corresponding to the independent control requirements with the largest comprehensive correlation coefficients.

[0136] On the other hand, the present application provides a knitting control platform, which adopts the above-mentioned method for realizing control separation of a knitting control platform, specifically including:

[0137] Control processor, management processor, data interaction interface;

[0138] The control processor is used for data processing for control needs, the management processor is responsible for data processing for management needs, and the data interaction interface is used for data interaction between the control processor and the management processor.

[0139] Each embodiment in this specification is described in a progressive manner, and the same or similar parts between the embodiments can be referred to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from other embodiments. In particular, for the device, equipment, and non-volatile computer storage medium embodiments, since they are basically similar to the method embodiments, the description is relatively simple, and the relevant parts can be referred to the partial description of the method embodiment.

[0140] The above is a description of a specific embodiment of the specification. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recorded in the claims can be performed in an order different from that in the embodiments and still achieve the desired results. In addition, the processes depicted in the drawings do not necessarily require the specific order or continuous order shown to achieve the desired results. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.

[0141] The above description is only one or more embodiments of this specification and is not intended to limit this specification. For those skilled in the art, one or more embodiments of this specification may have various changes and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of one or more embodiments of this specification shall be included in the scope of the claims of this specification.

Claims

1. A method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform, characterized in that: Specifically include: The data interaction requirements of the knitting control platform are divided into control requirements and management requirements, and based on the compatible data between the processors of different underwear looms and the processor of the knitting control platform, the processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements are allocated and processed to obtain the control processor of the knitting control platform and the management processor of the knitting control platform; Obtain the historical data interaction between the knitting control platform and the underwear loom under different control requirements, and when it is determined by using the historical data interaction that the real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to perform data interaction between the control processor and the management processor, proceed to the next step; According to the historical interaction data of control demand and management demand of different underwear looms under different business types, the control demand using real-time interaction strategy is determined and regarded as an independent control demand; Acquire the historical data interaction between the independent control demand and the underwear loom, and perform allocation processing of the processor of the independent control demand in combination with the association between the independent control demands under different business types to obtain the allocation processor, and adopt a real-time interaction strategy between the allocation processor and the management processor for data interaction; The total number of historical interactions is determined according to the number of historical interactions between control requirements and management requirements under different business types, and the busy interactive underwear looms among the underwear looms are determined by using the total number of historical interactions, and the control requirements whose number of busy interactive underwear looms is greater than the preset number of looms are determined as independent control requirements; Determine the business types of other independent control requirements that are associated with the independent control requirement and use them as associated business types, and classify other independent control requirements with the most associated business types and the independent control requirement into the same allocation processor.

2. The method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform according to claim 1, characterized in that: The control requirements and management requirements are divided into: Based on the types of data interaction requirements between the underwear loom and the knitting control platform, the data interaction requirements are divided into control requirements and management requirements.

3. The method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform according to claim 1, characterized in that: The compatibility data is determined based on historical compatibility failure data between the processor of the knitting control platform and the processor of the underwear loom under the corresponding interaction protocol type.

4. The method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform according to claim 1, characterized in that: Performing allocation processing of processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements specifically includes: Based on the compatibility data between the processor of the underwear loom and the processor of the knitting control platform, determining historical compatibility fault data between different processors of the underwear loom and the processor of the knitting control platform; Determining the number of historical compatibility failures with processors of different underwear looms according to historical compatibility failure data with processors of different underwear looms, and determining the total number of historical compatibility failures according to the number of historical compatibility failures; The processors corresponding to the control requirements and management requirements are allocated based on the total number of historical compatibility failures.

5. The method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform according to claim 4, characterized in that: The allocation process of the processors corresponding to the control requirements and the management requirements is performed based on the total number of historical compatibility failures, specifically including: The processor with the least total number of historical compatible failures is used as the processor corresponding to the control demand; The processor with the least total number of historical compatible failures, excluding the processor corresponding to the control requirement, is used as the processor corresponding to the management requirement.

6. The method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform according to claim 1, characterized in that: The historical data interaction situation is based on the data interaction frequency between the knitting control platform and the underwear loom under different control requirements.

7. The method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform according to claim 1, characterized in that: It is determined that the real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to control the data exchange between the processor and the management processor, including: Based on the historical data interaction between the knitting control platform and the underwear loom under different control requirements, the number of historical data interactions of control requirements in different time periods is determined; Determine a busy interaction period in the period according to the number of historical data interactions of control requirements in different time periods; Whether to adopt a real-time interaction strategy to perform data interaction between the control processor and the management processor is determined based on the number of the interaction busy periods.

8. The method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform according to claim 7, characterized in that: The busy interaction period is a period when the number of historical data interactions is greater than a preset interaction number threshold.

9. The method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform according to claim 7, characterized in that: When the number of the interaction busy periods does not meet the requirement, it is determined that the real-time interaction strategy cannot be used to perform data interaction between the control processor and the management processor.

10. The method for realizing control and management separation of a knitting control platform according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method for determining the control demand using the real-time interaction strategy is: Based on the historical interaction data of control demand and management demand under different business types, the historical interaction times of control demand and management demand under different business types of different underwear looms are determined; Determine the total number of historical interactions according to the number of historical interactions between control requirements and management requirements under different business types, and determine the busy interaction underwear loom among the underwear looms by using the total number of historical interactions; Whether the control demand is a control demand adopting a real-time interaction strategy is determined according to the number of the busy interactive underwear looms.

Images