Integration testing method, system and equipment for complex software system and medium
By automatically generating test cases in complex software systems, dynamically optimizing the test sequence and using automated error positioning technology, the problem of insufficient efficiency and accuracy of integrated testing of complex software systems in the existing technology is solved, and more efficient and accurate integration testing is achieved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411504590.1
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-10-26
- Publication Date
- 2025-03-04
AI Technical Summary
When facing complex software systems, how to effectively organize test cases, optimize test sequence, and accurately identify and locate problems is still an urgent problem in the industry.
By automatically generating test cases based on software requirements documents and code structures, using machine learning algorithms to analyze the dependencies between test cases, dynamically optimize the test sequence, and using automated execution, differential analysis or fault tree analysis technology to automatically locate error locations and provide repair suggestions.
The efficiency and accuracy of integrated testing have been significantly improved. Through intelligent test case generation, dynamic test sequence optimization and automated error positioning mechanisms, the automation level of tests and the accuracy of problem solving are improved.
Smart Images

Figure CN119557207A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of software development and testing, and in particular to an integrated testing method, system, equipment and medium for complex software systems. Background Art
[0002] As software systems become increasingly complex, integration testing has become an indispensable part of the software development cycle. Traditional integration testing methods often rely on manual test scripts, which are not only time-consuming and labor-intensive, but also prone to missing errors. In addition, although existing automated testing tools can perform a large number of testing tasks, when faced with complex systems, how to effectively organize test cases, optimize test sequences, and accurately identify and locate problems are still issues that the industry needs to solve. Summary of the invention
[0003] The object of the present invention is to provide an integrated testing method, system, device and medium for complex software systems, thereby solving all or one of the above-mentioned problems existing in the prior art.
[0004] In order to solve the above technical problems, the specific technical solutions of the present invention are as follows: In one aspect, the present invention provides an integrated testing method for a complex software system, comprising the following steps: Automatically generate test cases based on software requirement documents and code structure; Use machine learning algorithms to analyze dependencies between test cases and dynamically optimize the test sequence; Automatically execute test cases and collect test results; Using differential analysis or fault tree analysis technology, it can automatically locate the error location and provide repair suggestions.
[0005] In one embodiment, the process of automatically generating test cases also includes covering critical paths and boundary conditions.
[0006] In one embodiment, the algorithm for dynamically optimizing the test sequence further includes: using a machine learning algorithm to analyze the execution time and resource consumption of the test cases.
[0007] On the other hand, the present invention also provides an integrated testing system for a complex software system, comprising: Test case generation module, used to automatically generate test cases based on software requirement documents and code structure; The test sequence optimization module is used to analyze the dependencies between test cases using machine learning algorithms and dynamically optimize the test sequence; Test execution module, used to automatically execute test cases and collect test results; The error location and analysis module is used to automatically locate the error location and provide repair suggestions.
[0008] In one embodiment, the test case generation module is also used to cover critical paths and boundary conditions.
[0009] In one embodiment, the test sequence optimization module is also used to analyze the execution time and resource consumption of the test cases using a machine learning algorithm.
[0010] In one embodiment, the error location and analysis module is further configured to automatically locate the error position and provide repair suggestions by using differential analysis or fault tree analysis technology.
[0011] In one embodiment, it also includes: The user interface is used to display test progress, test results, and error location information, and allows users to configure and adjust.
[0012] On the other hand, the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the integrated testing method for a complex software system are implemented.
[0013] On the other hand, the present invention further provides a computer device, comprising a processor, a communication interface, a memory and a communication bus, wherein the processor, the communication interface and the memory communicate with each other via the communication bus; wherein: The memory is used to store computer programs; The processor is used to execute the steps of the method by running the program stored in the memory.
[0014] The beneficial effects of the technical solution of the present invention are: The integrated testing method for complex software systems described in the present invention can significantly improve the efficiency and accuracy of integrated testing through intelligent test case generation, dynamic test sequence optimization, and automated error location mechanism. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0015] In order to more clearly illustrate the specific implementation methods of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the specific implementation methods or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are some implementation methods of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.
[0016] Figure 1It is a flowchart of the integrated testing method for a complex software system described in Example 1 of the present invention; Figure 2 It is a schematic diagram of the architecture of the integrated testing system for complex software systems according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention; Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the structure of the computer device described in Example 4 of the present invention; The symbols in the accompanying drawings are explained as follows: 1501, processor; 1502, communication interface; 1503, memory; 1504, communication bus. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017] The preferred embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings so that the advantages and features of the present invention can be more easily understood by those skilled in the art, thereby making a clearer and more definite definition of the protection scope of the present invention.
[0018] In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that the embodiments described in the present invention are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, rather than all of the embodiments; based on the embodiments in the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in the field without making creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.
[0019] The terms "first", "second", etc. in the specification and claims of this article and the above-mentioned drawings are used to distinguish similar objects, and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that the data used in this way can be interchanged where appropriate, so that the embodiments of this article described here can be implemented in an order other than those illustrated or described here. In addition, the terms "including" and "having" and any variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions, for example, a process, method, device, product or equipment that includes a series of steps or units is not necessarily limited to those steps or units clearly listed, but may include other steps or units that are not clearly listed or inherent to these processes, methods, products or equipment. Example 1
[0020] This embodiment provides an integrated testing method for a complex software system. Figure 1 As shown, the following steps are included: Automatically generate test cases based on software requirement documents and code structure; Use machine learning algorithms to analyze dependencies between test cases and dynamically optimize the test sequence; Automatically execute test cases and collect test results; Using differential analysis or fault tree analysis technology, it can automatically locate the error location and provide repair suggestions.
[0021] In one embodiment, the process of automatically generating test cases also includes covering critical paths and boundary conditions.
[0022] In one embodiment, the algorithm for dynamically optimizing the test sequence further includes: using a machine learning algorithm to analyze the execution time and resource consumption of the test cases.
[0023] It should be noted that the examples herein are only for explaining the present invention and are not intended to limit the protection scope of the present invention. Example 2
[0024] This embodiment is based on the same inventive concept as the integrated testing method for a complex software system described in Embodiment 1, and provides an integrated testing system for a complex software system, such as Figure 2 As shown, including: Test case generation module, used to automatically generate test cases based on software requirement documents and code structure; The test sequence optimization module is used to analyze the dependencies between test cases using machine learning algorithms and dynamically optimize the test sequence; Test execution module, used to automatically execute test cases and collect test results; The error location and analysis module is used to automatically locate the error location and provide repair suggestions.
[0025] In one embodiment, the test case generation module is also used to cover critical paths and boundary conditions.
[0026] In one embodiment, the test sequence optimization module is also used to analyze the execution time and resource consumption of the test cases using a machine learning algorithm.
[0027] In one embodiment, the error location and analysis module is further configured to automatically locate the error position and provide repair suggestions by using differential analysis or fault tree analysis technology.
[0028] In one embodiment, it also includes: The user interface is used to display test progress, test results, and error location information, and allows users to configure and adjust. Example 3
[0029] This embodiment provides a computer-readable storage medium, including: The storage medium is used to store computer software instructions used to implement the integrated testing method for a complex software system described in the above-mentioned embodiment 1, which includes a program for executing the above-mentioned program set for the integrated testing method for a complex software system; specifically, the executable program can be built into the integrated testing system for a complex software system described in embodiment 2, so that the integrated testing system for a complex software system can implement the integrated testing method for a complex software system described in embodiment 1 by executing the built-in executable program.
[0030] In addition, the computer-readable storage medium of this embodiment may adopt any combination of one or more computer-readable storage media, wherein the computer-readable storage medium includes electrical, optical, electromagnetic, infrared or semiconductor systems, devices or components, or any combination thereof. Example 4
[0031] This embodiment provides an electronic device, such as Figure 3 As shown, the electronic device may include: a processor 1501 , a communication interface 1502 , a memory 1503 and a communication bus 1504 , wherein the processor 1501 , the communication interface 1502 , and the memory 1503 communicate with each other via the communication bus 1504 .
[0032] Memory 1503, used for storing computer programs; The processor 1501 is used to implement the steps of the integrated testing method for a complex software system described in the above-mentioned embodiment 1 when executing the computer program stored in the memory 1503.
[0033] As an embodiment of the present invention, the communication bus mentioned in the above terminal can be a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus or an Extended Industry Standard Architecture (EISA) bus. The communication bus can be divided into an address bus, a data bus, a control bus, etc. For ease of representation, Figure 3 Only one thick line is used in the diagram, but this does not mean that there is only one bus or only one type of bus.
[0034] As an implementation mode of the present invention, the communication interface is used for communication between the above-mentioned terminal and other devices.
[0035] As an embodiment of the present invention, the memory may include a random access memory (RAM) or a non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk memory. Optionally, the memory may also be at least one storage device located away from the aforementioned processor.
[0036] As an embodiment of the present invention, the above-mentioned processor can be a general-purpose processor, including a central processing unit (CPU), a network processor (NP), etc.; it can also be a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gates or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components.
[0037] It should be understood that in the various embodiments of this document, the size of the serial numbers of the above-mentioned processes does not mean the order of execution. The execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of this document.
[0038] It should also be understood that in the embodiments of this article, the term "and / or" is only a description of the association relationship of the associated objects, indicating that three relationships may exist. For example, A and / or B can represent: A exists alone, A and B exist at the same time, and B exists alone. In addition, the character " / " in this article generally indicates that the associated objects before and after are in an "or" relationship.
[0039] Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the units and algorithm steps of each example described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented in electronic hardware, computer software, or a combination of the two. In order to clearly illustrate the interchangeability of hardware and software, the composition and steps of each example have been generally described in terms of function in the above description. Whether these functions are performed in hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Professional and technical personnel can use different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application, but such implementation should not be considered to be beyond the scope of this article.
[0040] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the systems, devices and units described above can refer to the corresponding processes in the aforementioned method embodiments and will not be repeated here.
[0041] In the several embodiments provided herein, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, devices and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device embodiments described above are only schematic, for example, the division of the units is only a logical function division, and there may be other division methods in actual implementation, such as multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. In addition, the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, devices or units, or can be electrical, mechanical or other forms of connection.
[0042] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the embodiments of this article.
[0043] In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of this invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit. The above integrated unit may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional unit.
[0044] If the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this article is essentially or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product, and the computer software product is stored in a storage medium, including a number of instructions to enable a computer device (which can be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the method described in each embodiment of this article. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), disk or optical disk and other media that can store program codes.
[0045] The above descriptions are merely embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the patent scope of the present invention. Any equivalent structure or equivalent process transformation made using the contents of the present invention specification and drawings, or directly or indirectly applied in other related technical fields, are also included in the patent protection scope of the present invention.
Claims
1. An integrated testing method for a complex software system, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Automatically generate test cases based on software requirement documents and code structure; Use machine learning algorithms to analyze dependencies between test cases and dynamically optimize the test sequence; Automatically execute test cases and collect test results; Using differential analysis or fault tree analysis technology, it can automatically locate the error location and provide repair suggestions.
2. The integrated testing method for a complex software system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The process of automatically generating test cases also includes coverage of critical paths and boundary conditions.
3. The integrated testing method for a complex software system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The algorithm for dynamically optimizing the test sequence also includes: using a machine learning algorithm to analyze the execution time and resource consumption of the test cases.
4. An integrated testing system for complex software systems, characterized in that: include: Test case generation module, used to automatically generate test cases based on software requirement documents and code structure; The test sequence optimization module is used to analyze the dependencies between test cases using machine learning algorithms and dynamically optimize the test sequence; Test execution module, used to automatically execute test cases and collect test results; The error location and analysis module is used to automatically locate the error location and provide repair suggestions.
5. The integrated testing system for complex software systems according to claim 4, characterized in that: The test case generation module is also used to cover critical paths and boundary conditions.
6. The integrated testing system for complex software systems according to claim 4, characterized in that: The test sequence optimization module is also used to analyze the execution time and resource consumption of test cases using a machine learning algorithm.
7. The integrated testing system for complex software systems according to claim 4, characterized in that: The error location and analysis module is also used to automatically locate the error position and provide repair suggestions using differential analysis or fault tree analysis technology.
8. The integrated testing system for complex software systems according to claim 4, characterized in that: Also includes: The user interface is used to display test progress, test results, and error location information, and allows users to configure and adjust.
9. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the integrated testing method for a complex software system described in any one of claims 1 to 3 are implemented.
10. A computer device, characterized in that: It includes a processor, a communication interface, a memory and a communication bus, wherein the processor, the communication interface and the memory communicate with each other through the communication bus; wherein: The memory is used to store computer programs; The processor is used to execute the steps of the integrated testing method for a complex software system as described in any one of claims 1 to 3 by running the program stored in the memory.