Personal operation settlement method and system applied to engineering cost project

Abstract

The invention relates to a personal operation settlement method and system applied to an engineering cost project, and the method comprises the steps: determining a user responsible file for the personal operation settlement of a user from an engineering cost result file based on a preset field division rule; based on a preset substantial verification rule, dividing the user responsible file into a substantial verification file and a comparison verification file; performing substantial verification on the substantial verification file to obtain a substantial verification result, and performing comparison verification on the comparison verification file to obtain a comparison verification result; obtaining an accuracy verification score according to the substantial verification result and the comparison verification result; based on a preset timeliness scoring rule, the timeliness of the project cost achievement file is judged, and a timeliness score is obtained; and obtaining a personal operation settlement result of the user based on the accuracy verification score and the timeliness score. The method has the effects of improving the personal operation settlement accuracy of the project cost project and guaranteeing the settlement efficiency.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of engineering cost settlement, and in particular to a personal business settlement method and system applied to engineering cost projects. Background Art

[0002] At present, in the construction industry, engineering cost engineers play a vital role. They are responsible for ensuring that the cost of engineering projects is accurately calculated and effectively controlled. However, in the process of operating settlement, the existing settlement methods often have some limitations. On the one hand, if the engineering cost settlement method mainly relies on the comparison of engineering progress and completeness, that is, according to the actual progress of the project, the engineering progress and completion content agreed in the contract are compared to calculate the engineering payment to be paid. Since the progress of the project is often affected by many factors, such as weather, material supply, design changes, etc., there is often a certain degree of subjectivity in judging the progress of the project, resulting in inaccurate progress judgment; On the other hand, if a more accurate settlement result is obtained through in-depth analysis of the actual situation of the project and comprehensive consideration of various factors, it will take a lot of time and energy to conduct in-depth analysis and comparison of these data to draw accurate conclusions, and it will be impossible to quickly and accurately settle the personal operations of the cost engineer. Summary of the invention

[0003] In order to improve the accuracy of individual business settlement of engineering cost projects and ensure settlement efficiency, the present application provides a method, system, computer equipment and storage medium for individual business settlement of engineering cost projects.

[0004] In the first aspect, the above-mentioned invention objective of the present application is achieved through the following technical solutions: A personal operating settlement method applied to an engineering cost project, the personal operating settlement method applied to an engineering cost project comprising: Based on the preset field division rules, determine the user responsible files for the user's personal business settlement from the engineering cost results files; Based on the preset substantive verification rules, the user's responsible files are divided into substantive verification files and comparative verification files; Performing a substantial verification on the substantial verification document to obtain a substantial verification result, and performing a comparative verification on the comparative verification document to obtain a comparative verification result; Obtaining an accuracy verification score based on the substantive verification result and the comparative verification result; Based on the preset timeliness scoring rules, the timeliness of the engineering cost result document is judged to obtain a timeliness score; Based on the accuracy verification score and the timeliness score, the user's personal business settlement result is obtained.

[0005] By adopting the above technical solution, the results of engineering cost are divided according to professional fields, including cost results in various professional fields such as civil engineering, HVAC, and water supply and drainage. Each professional field is under the charge of a specialized professional cost engineer, that is, for engineering cost projects, cost engineers in different professional fields are responsible for and are responsible for the tasks in the corresponding professional fields. Therefore, if the workload of each cost engineer is to be judged, first, the part of the engineering cost results that the current cost engineer is responsible for is divided according to professional fields and then according to personal labor through the preset field division rules. In this way, the user responsible files for the cost engineer's personal business settlement are determined from the engineering cost results files, so as to avoid assigning engineering cost files of different professional fields to the current cost engineer when dividing the user responsible files for the cost engineer's personal business settlement, resulting in settlement errors. After determining the responsible files for the cost engineer's personal business settlement, the accuracy of the responsible files for the cost engineer's personal business settlement should be judged, and the labor of the cost engineer should be evaluated based on the accuracy. Scoring is performed and then settlement is made. When judging the accuracy, different verification methods can be used for different parts of the documents. For example, data information that directly affects the delivery of engineering cost projects requires more in-depth and accurate verification, while format clauses or data information that have a lower degree of impact on the delivery of engineering cost projects can be verified by comparing the number of task lists and the accuracy of clauses. Therefore, the preset substantive verification rules, that is, the preset rules for dividing in-depth substantive verification and comparative verification, can be determined by the data information that customers pay more attention to when the engineering cost project is delivered or the data information that customers mainly rely on during construction, as well as data information that is prone to errors. Based on this, the divided substantive verification documents and comparative verification documents are respectively verified accordingly. In this way, substantive verification can be carried out on important parts to improve the accuracy of personal business settlement of cost engineers in engineering cost projects based on their work results. At the same time, it is not required that all engineering cost results documents be substantially verified to ensure settlement efficiency.

[0006] In a preferred example, the present application may be further configured as follows: before substantially verifying the substantial verification document and obtaining the substantial verification result, the individual business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project further includes: Performing a cost work intensity analysis on the comparison and verification documents to obtain a cost work intensity analysis result; According to the cost work intensity analysis result, extracting the intensity substantive verification document from the comparative verification document; The strength substantive verification document is merged into the substantive verification document.

[0007] By adopting the above technical solution, the preset substantive verification rules include the data information that customers pay more attention to when the engineering cost project is delivered or the data information that customers mainly rely on when constructing, as well as the rules for determining the division of easily erroneous data information. Therefore, the preset substantive verification rules mainly determine the substantive verification documents from objective perspectives such as the delivery of results and the content of the documents. However, in order to more accurately determine the settlement of the cost engineer and further ensure the accuracy of the engineering cost delivery results, it is also necessary to determine the substantive verification documents in terms of the work intensity of the cost engineer when conducting the cost, because the higher the work intensity of the cost engineer when conducting the cost, for example, the greater the amount of calculation involved, the more words compiled, or the more referenced materials, the more likely it is that the personal mistakes of the cost engineer will lead to errors in the engineering cost delivery results. Therefore, it is also necessary to analyze the cost work intensity of the comparative verification documents, that is, the labor intensity analysis of the cost engineer, and determine the part of the engineering cost delivery results for which the corresponding cost engineer has put in more labor as the substantive verification document. For example, when the amount of reference and reference of a part of the data letter is higher than the average, it can be determined as a substantive verification document, thereby further improving the accuracy of the personal business settlement of the engineering cost project.

[0008] In a preferred example, the present application may be further configured as follows: after the strength substantial verification file is merged into the substantial verification file, the individual business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project further includes: Performing a predicted depth analysis on the remaining comparison and verification documents after extracting the strength substantive verification documents from the comparison and verification documents to obtain a predicted depth analysis result; Extracting deep substantive verification documents from the remaining comparison verification documents according to the predicted deep analysis results; The deep substantive verification file is merged into the substantive verification file.

[0009] By adopting the above technical solution, in the engineering cost delivery results documents, some engineering cost delivery results documents are calculated based on fixed data, while some engineering cost delivery results documents are based on data that is relatively unstable. Therefore, the data based on these engineering cost delivery results documents need to be determined after certain predictions. For example, the taxes and fees that need to be paid during the entire process of the construction project, such as value-added tax and income tax, can be calculated according to a fixed tax rate, while labor costs and material prices are affected by a variety of unstable factors, such as market supply and demand, labor costs, design changes, etc., and need to be calculated using appropriate prediction methods. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct substantive verification on some engineering cost delivery documents that use data determined based on certain predictions. Therefore, after extracting the strength substantive verification documents from the comparison verification documents, the remaining comparison verification documents are subjected to forecast depth analysis. The forecast depth analysis will analyze the volatility of the remaining comparison verification documents, the forecasting method used in the forecast, the training degree of the forecasting model, and the instability of the influencing factors, etc., to judge the complexity and detail of the forecast, and thus extract the comparison verification documents with higher forecast complexity and higher detail from the remaining comparison verification documents as deep substantive verification documents, thereby further improving the accuracy of individual business settlement of engineering cost projects.

[0010] In a preferred example, the present application may be further configured as follows: before substantially verifying the substantial verification document and obtaining the substantial verification result, the individual business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project further includes: Analyze the comparison and verification file to obtain format template information representing the template used by the comparison and verification file, and user portrait information representing the cost work characteristics of the user; Determining the adaptability of the format template information to the current cost engineering project, and obtaining template adaptability information; Extracting a comparison substantive verification document from the comparison verification document based on the user portrait information and the template adaptability information; The compared substantial verification document is merged into the substantial verification document.

[0011] By adopting the above technical scheme, when the substantive verification documents and comparative verification documents are divided based on the preset substantive verification rules, the engineering cost result documents that use fixed templates and format clauses are usually divided into comparative verification documents, because this part of the engineering cost result documents will basically not change significantly, so the historical templates and clauses can be used. However, in actual applications, due to factors such as policy changes, the fixed templates and format clauses may also need to change accordingly. If the cost engineer fails to respond in time or uses incorrect fixed templates and format clauses, the engineering cost result documents will have a greater risk of error. Therefore, the comparative verification documents are analyzed, the types of fixed templates and format clauses used in the comparative verification documents are determined, and the format template information representing the template used in the comparative verification documents is obtained. In this way, the number of times the fixed templates and format clauses used can be determined first. The more times they are used, the more commonly such fixed templates and format clauses are used, and the greater the probability of finding unreasonableness in practice. Therefore, the engineering cost result documents corresponding to the fixed templates and format clauses that are used more times can be substantially verified. For example, for the engineering cost result documents that use fixed templates and format clauses, It can be judged whether the fixed templates and format clauses are used accurately, that is, whether the data filling position in the fixed templates and format clauses is accurate, and whether the setting position of the fixed templates and format clauses is accurate, etc., and the adaptability of the types of fixed templates and format clauses to the current cost projects and construction projects can be judged. For example, it can be judged whether the format requirements and normative requirements of the current cost projects and construction projects are met, and whether the fixed templates and format clauses cover all the content required for the current cost projects. In this way, for fixed templates and format clauses that are judged to have low adaptability, it is also necessary to conduct substantial verification of some engineering cost results documents that use these fixed templates and format clauses with low adaptability, so as to further improve the accuracy of personal business settlement of engineering cost projects. At the same time, according to the user portrait information, targeted verification can be carried out according to the work characteristics of the cost engineer when conducting cost consulting, which improves the accuracy of verification. At the same time, data can also be collected for the next work order allocation. In addition, the professional field in which the cost engineer is good at can be evaluated based on the current cost consulting results, as well as the professional ability of the cost engineer to be improved, so as to facilitate the push of corresponding training content.

[0012] In a preferred example, the present application may be further configured as follows: obtaining an accuracy verification score according to the substantive verification result and the comparative verification result specifically includes: Calculating the ratio of the substantive verification document to the engineering cost results document, and determining a substantive verification scoring rule corresponding to the substantive verification result according to the ratio; Based on the preset comparative verification scoring rules and the substantive verification scoring rules, an accuracy verification score is obtained.

[0013] By adopting the above technical solution, after completing the substantive verification and comparative verification, it is necessary to comprehensively evaluate the substantive verification results and the comparative verification results for accuracy scoring, and determine the personal operating settlement results of the cost engineer based on the accuracy score. When determining the accuracy score of the cost engineer, it is necessary to determine it according to the corresponding rules, because when determining the personal operating settlement results of the cost engineer, it is necessary to determine the deduction ratio of the personal operating settlement based on the accuracy score. However, each engineering cost project and construction project are different, and the workload and difficulty of each engineering cost project are different, and the degree of error is also different. Therefore, if different cost engineers of each different engineering cost project are scored based on the same scoring rules, it will be unfair to the cost engineers. Therefore, the ratio of the substantive verification documents to the engineering cost results documents determined by the prediction depth analysis and labor intensity analysis can be calculated, and the complexity of the corresponding current engineering cost results documents and the reasonable error range of the cost engineer when performing the cost can be judged, so as to determine the substantive verification scoring rules corresponding to the substantive verification results, thereby determining the accuracy rate of the personal operating settlement of the engineering cost project.

[0014] In the second aspect, the above invention objective of the present application is achieved through the following technical solutions: A personal business settlement system applied to engineering cost projects, the personal business settlement system applied to engineering cost projects comprising: The field division module is used to determine the user responsible files for the user's personal business settlement from the engineering cost results files based on the preset field division rules; A substantive division module, used to divide the user's responsible files into substantive verification files and comparative verification files based on preset substantive verification rules; A verification module, used to perform a substantial verification on the substantial verification document to obtain a substantial verification result, and to perform a comparative verification on the comparative verification document to obtain a comparative verification result; An accuracy scoring module, used to obtain an accuracy verification score according to the substantive verification result and the comparative verification result; A timeliness scoring module is used to determine the timeliness of the engineering cost result document based on a preset timeliness scoring rule and obtain a timeliness score; The settlement module is used to obtain the user's personal business settlement result based on the accuracy verification score and the timeliness score.

[0015] Optionally, the personal business settlement system applied to the engineering cost project also includes: A strength analysis module, used to perform a cost work strength analysis on the comparison and verification documents to obtain a cost work strength analysis result; A strength extraction module, used to extract a strength substantive verification document from the comparison verification document according to the cost work strength analysis result; A strength merging module is used to merge the strength substantive verification file into the substantive verification file.

[0016] Optionally, the personal business settlement system applied to the engineering cost project also includes: A prediction depth analysis module, used to perform a prediction depth analysis on the comparison and verification files remaining after the strength substantive verification files are extracted from the comparison and verification files, and obtain a prediction depth analysis result; A predicted depth extraction module, used to extract deep substantive verification documents from the remaining comparison verification documents according to the predicted depth analysis result; A predicted depth merging module is used to merge the deep substantive verification file into the substantive verification file.

[0017] In the third aspect, the above invention objective of the present application is achieved through the following technical solutions: A computer device includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor. When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the above-mentioned individual business settlement method applied to engineering cost projects are implemented.

[0018] In a fourth aspect, the above-mentioned invention objective of the present application is achieved through the following technical solutions: A computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the above-mentioned personal business settlement method applied to engineering cost projects.

[0019] In summary, the present application includes at least one of the following beneficial technical effects: 1. After determining the responsible documents for the personal business settlement of the cost engineer, it is necessary to judge the accuracy of the responsible documents for the personal business settlement of the cost engineer, score the cost engineer's work according to the accuracy and then settle. When judging the accuracy, different verification methods can be used for different parts of the documents. For example, for data information that directly affects the delivery of the engineering cost project, a more in-depth and accurate verification is required, while for format clauses or data information that affects the delivery of the engineering cost project to a lesser extent, it can be verified by comparing the number of task lists and the accuracy of clauses. Therefore, the preset substantive verification rules, that is, the preset rules for dividing the in-depth substantive verification and the comparative verification, can be determined by the data information that the customer pays more attention to when the engineering cost project is delivered or the data information that the customer mainly relies on during construction, as well as the data information that is prone to error. Based on this, the divided substantive verification documents and comparative verification documents are verified accordingly. In this way, substantive verification can be carried out on important parts to improve the accuracy of the personal business settlement of the engineering cost project, and at the same time, it is not required that all engineering cost results documents be substantively verified to ensure settlement efficiency; 2. The preset substantive verification rules include the data information that customers pay more attention to when delivering the engineering cost project or the data information that customers mainly rely on when constructing, as well as the rules for determining the division of easily erroneous data information. Therefore, the preset substantive verification rules mainly determine the substantive verification documents from objective perspectives such as the delivery of results and the content of the documents. However, in order to more accurately determine the settlement of the cost engineer and further ensure the accuracy of the engineering cost delivery results, it is also necessary to determine the substantive verification documents in terms of the work intensity of the cost engineer when conducting the cost calculation. Because the higher the work intensity of the cost engineer when conducting the cost calculation, for example, the larger the amount of calculation involved, the more words compiled, or the more referenced materials, the more likely it is that the personal mistakes of the cost engineer will lead to errors in the engineering cost delivery results. Therefore, it is also necessary to analyze the cost work intensity of the comparative verification documents, that is, the labor intensity analysis of the cost engineer, and determine the part of the engineering cost delivery results that the corresponding cost engineer has put in more labor as the substantive verification document. For example, when the amount of reference and reference of a certain part of the data letter is higher than the average, it can be determined as a substantive verification document, so as to further improve the accuracy of the personal business settlement of the engineering cost project; 3. In the engineering cost delivery documents, some engineering cost delivery documents are calculated based on fixed data, while some engineering cost delivery documents are based on data that is relatively unstable. Therefore, the data based on these engineering cost delivery documents need to be determined after certain forecasts. For example, the taxes and fees that need to be paid during the entire process of the construction project, such as value-added tax and income tax, can be calculated according to a fixed tax rate. However, labor costs and material prices are affected by a variety of unstable factors, such as market supply and demand, labor costs, design changes, etc., and appropriate forecasting methods need to be used for calculation. Therefore, it is necessary to It is necessary to conduct substantive verification on some engineering cost delivery documents that use data determined based on certain predictions. Therefore, a forecast depth analysis is conducted on the remaining comparative verification documents after extracting the strength substantive verification documents from the comparative verification documents. The forecast depth analysis will analyze the volatility of the remaining comparative verification documents, the forecasting method used in the forecast, the training degree of the forecasting model, and the instability of the influencing factors, etc., to judge the complexity and detail of the forecast, and thus extract the comparative verification documents with higher forecast complexity and higher detail from the remaining comparative verification documents as deep substantive verification documents, thereby further improving the accuracy of individual business settlement of engineering cost projects. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0020] Figure 1 This is a first implementation flow chart of the personal business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project in the embodiment of the present application; Figure 2 and Figure 3 This is a screenshot of the interface of personal business settlement in the smart cost management system in the embodiment of the present application; Figure 4 It is a second implementation flow chart of the personal business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project in the embodiment of the present application; Figure 5 It is a third implementation flow chart of the personal business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project in the embodiment of the present application; Figure 6 It is a fourth implementation flow chart of the personal business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project in the embodiment of the present application; Figure 7 is a flowchart for implementing S40 of the personal business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project in the embodiment of the present application; Figure 8 This is a principle block diagram of a personal business settlement system applied to engineering cost projects in an embodiment of the present application; Fig. 9 It is a diagram of the internal structure of a computer device in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0021] The following is combined with Figure 1-9 This application is described in further detail.

[0022] In one embodiment, if Figure 1 As shown, the present application discloses a personal business settlement method applied to engineering cost projects, which specifically includes the following steps: S10: Based on the preset field division rules, determine the user responsible file for the user's personal business settlement from the engineering cost results file.

[0023] In this embodiment, the individual operating settlement method applied to the engineering cost project is applied to the smart cost management system, which is used to perform the operating settlement of cost engineers. The smart work order system can also communicate with the smart human resources system, and the individual operating settlement results generated by the smart work order system can be pushed to the smart human resources system. The preset field division rules refer to the rules used to divide the engineering cost results files according to professional fields.

[0024] Specifically, after the cost engineer uploads the engineering cost results file to the smart cost management system and applies for personal business settlement, the preset field division rules are extracted. The preset field division rules refer to the rules used to divide the engineering cost results file according to professional fields. Because the results of engineering cost are divided from professional fields, including cost results in various professional fields such as civil engineering, HVAC, and water supply and drainage, each professional field is under the charge of a specialized professional cost engineer, that is, for engineering cost projects, cost engineers in different professional fields are responsible for and are responsible for tasks in corresponding professional fields. There are obvious areas in the cost documents of different professional fields. For example, the HVAC engineering cost includes part of the cost information of the heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems, while the civil engineering cost includes the foundation. Cost information of engineering, main structure engineering, decoration engineering, etc. Therefore, the preset field division rules can be divided by identifying the professional terms in the catalog outline and identifying the professional terms in each professional field in the cost content; the engineering cost results files uploaded by the cost engineer may be relatively complete engineering cost results files, that is, they include cost files of cost engineers in other professional fields. Therefore, if you want to judge the workload of each cost engineer, firstly, based on the preset field division rules, screen the cost files corresponding to the professional field of the cost engineer who is currently applying for personal business settlement from the engineering cost results files, and then identify the screened cost files to determine the user-responsible files that belong to the labor results of the cost engineer who is currently applying for personal business settlement.

[0025] S20: Based on preset substantive verification rules, the user's responsible files are divided into substantive verification files and comparative verification files.

[0026] Specifically, after determining the responsible documents for the personal business settlement of the cost engineer, it is necessary to judge the accuracy of the responsible documents for the personal business settlement of the cost engineer, score the cost engineer's work based on the accuracy and then settle the accounts. When judging the accuracy, different verification methods are used for different parts of the documents. The verification methods include substantive verification and comparative verification. Among them, substantive verification includes checking the source, accuracy and completeness of the data used, evaluating the sensitivity of the cost estimation results to changes in key variables, and substantive review by internal professional senior experts. Comparative verification includes checking whether the work results submitted by the engineer meet the predetermined quality standards, and evaluating whether the work results submitted by the engineer cover all the predetermined tasks and requirements. That is, comparative verification refers to judging the accuracy of the completion of the cost engineer's work, while substantive verification refers to judging the accuracy of the substantive aspects of the cost content. It can be seen that the accuracy of substantive verification is higher than that of comparative verification, but the time consumed by substantive verification is much longer than that consumed by comparative verification. Therefore, the overall user-responsible files can be reasonably divided. Some user-responsible files are judged for accuracy by substantive verification, and the accuracy of the remaining user-responsible files is judged by comparative verification. This can improve the accuracy of individual business settlement of engineering cost projects while ensuring settlement efficiency. Therefore, the preset substantive verification rules are extracted. The substantive verification rules refer to the rules used to divide in-depth substantive verification and comparative verification. For example, for files that directly affect engineering cost Data information related to project delivery, involving compliance, directly affecting the profitability of cost projects, with large cost amounts, and with clear and detailed agreements in the contract between the cost party and the engineering party, requires more in-depth and accurate verification. For format clauses or data information that has a lower degree of impact on the delivery of engineering cost projects, verification can be carried out by comparing the number of task lists and the accuracy of clauses. Therefore, based on the preset substantive verification rules, user-responsible documents are divided into substantive verification documents and comparative verification documents. Substantive verification documents are user-responsible documents for substantive verification, and comparative verification documents are user-responsible documents for comparative verification.

[0027] S30: Perform substantial verification on the substantial verification documents to obtain substantial verification results, and perform comparative verification on the comparative verification documents to obtain comparative verification results.

[0028] Specifically, after the substantive verification documents and the comparative verification documents are divided, the substantive verification documents are respectively substantially verified, and the comparative verification documents are respectively comparatively verified in a corresponding manner, so as to obtain the substantive verification results and the comparative verification results.

[0029] S40: Obtain an accuracy verification score based on the substantive verification results and the comparative verification results.

[0030] Specifically, after obtaining the substantive verification results and the comparative verification results, an accuracy verification score is generated based on the substantive verification results and the comparative verification results. For example, the accuracy verification score is obtained by calculating the proportion of verification errors represented in the substantive verification results and the comparative verification results, with the score being 100 when completely correct.

[0031] S50: Based on the preset timeliness scoring rules, determine the timeliness of the engineering cost results document and obtain a timeliness score.

[0032] Specifically, after completing the accuracy score of the engineering cost results document, it is also necessary to judge the timeliness of the engineering cost results document. For example, compare the application time when the cost engineer initiates the personal business settlement with the scheduled completion time. If the application time when the cost engineer initiates the personal business settlement exceeds the scheduled completion time, calculate the timeliness score.

[0033] S60: Based on the accuracy verification score and timeliness score, the user's personal business settlement results are obtained.

[0034] Specifically, based on the accuracy verification score and timeliness score, the user's personal business settlement result is calculated according to the preset personal business settlement rules, for example, Figure 2 As shown in the figure, when the accuracy verification score and timeliness score are both 100 points, no penalty will be imposed after the user's personal business settlement result is calculated according to the preset personal business settlement rules, such as Figure 3 As shown, when both the accuracy verification score and the timeliness score are not 100 points, the penalty ratio is calculated based on the actual accuracy verification score and timeliness score. For example, the accuracy verification score has an error rate of 2.36%. Within the range of error rate greater than 1% and less than 3%, the timeliness score is 96, which is less than 100 points. Therefore, the initial commission base is calculated based on the cost task assigned to the user, and then the personal business settlement result is calculated according to the preset personal business settlement rules. Then, the penalty is calculated according to the preset penalty rules to obtain the commission coefficient corresponding to the commission base. The user's personal business settlement result is calculated through the commission base and the commission coefficient. Figure 2 and Figure 3 This is a screenshot of the interface of personal business settlement in the smart cost management system.

[0035] Furthermore, users can view their personal business settlement results and corresponding scoring rules, and they can also fill out complaint instructions.

[0036] In one embodiment, if Figure 4 As shown, in step S30: substantially verifying the substantial verification document, before obtaining the substantial verification result, the individual business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project also includes: S030: Conduct cost work intensity analysis on the comparison and verification documents to obtain cost work intensity analysis results.

[0037] In this embodiment, the cost work intensity analysis result refers to the difficulty analysis result of the work performed by the cost engineer when performing cost consulting.

[0038] Specifically, the preset substantive verification rules include data information that customers pay more attention to when the engineering cost project is delivered or the data information that customers mainly rely on when constructing, as well as the rules for determining the division of error-prone data information. Therefore, the preset substantive verification rules mainly determine the substantive verification documents from objective perspectives such as the delivery of results and the content of the documents. However, in order to more accurately determine the settlement of the cost engineer and further ensure the accuracy of the engineering cost delivery results, it is also necessary to determine the substantive verification documents in terms of the work intensity of the cost engineer when conducting the cost calculation. Because the higher the work intensity of the cost engineer when conducting the cost calculation, for example, the greater the amount of calculation involved, the more words compiled, or the more referenced materials, the more likely it is that the personal mistakes of the cost engineer will lead to errors in the engineering cost delivery results. Therefore, the cost work intensity analysis is performed on the comparison and verification documents, including analyzing the amount of calculation involved in the data information in the comparison and verification documents, the number of words compiled except the template, and the amount of referenced materials, etc. The data information such as the amount of calculation involved, the number of words compiled except the template, and the amount of referenced materials obtained by the analysis are compared with the corresponding preset thresholds to obtain the cost work intensity analysis results.

[0039] It should be noted that when comparing the data information such as the amount of calculation involved in the analysis, the number of words compiled excluding the template, and the amount of reference materials with the corresponding preset thresholds, the threshold used is the threshold that matches the current cost item type, that is, the thresholds corresponding to different types of cost items are different, because the average labor intensity of different types of cost items is different. Therefore, the corresponding matching threshold is used to ensure the accuracy of the cost work intensity analysis results.

[0040] S130: Based on the results of the cost work intensity analysis, extract the substantive strength verification documents from the comparative verification documents.

[0041] Specifically, according to the results of the cost work intensity analysis, the part of the comparison and verification document that is greater than the corresponding threshold is extracted from the comparison and verification document as the substantive strength verification document, that is, the cost document that needs to be substantively verified based on the cost work intensity analysis.

[0042] S230: Merge the strength substantive verification document into the substantive verification document.

[0043] Specifically, the strength substantive verification document is merged into the substantive verification document, so that when the accuracy verification is performed, the strength substantive verification document and the substantive verification document are substantially verified.

[0044] In one embodiment, if Figure 5 As shown, in step S230: after the strength substantive verification file is merged into the substantive verification file, the individual business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project also includes: S2301: Perform a predicted depth analysis on the comparison and verification files remaining after the strength substantive verification files are extracted from the comparison and verification files to obtain a predicted depth analysis result.

[0045] In this embodiment, the forecast depth analysis result refers to the analysis result of the complexity and detail level of the forecasted cost content.

[0046] Specifically, in the project cost delivery results documents, some of the project cost delivery results documents are calculated based on fixed data, while the data on which some of the project cost delivery results documents are based are relatively unstable. Therefore, the data on which these project cost delivery results documents are based need to be determined after certain forecasts. For example, the taxes and fees that need to be paid throughout the entire process of the construction project, such as value-added tax and income tax, can be calculated at a fixed tax rate. However, labor costs and material prices are affected by a variety of unstable factors, such as market supply and demand, labor costs, design changes, etc., and appropriate forecasting methods need to be used for calculation. Unreasonable forecasting methods will lead to cost errors. Therefore, it is necessary to use the data based on The partial engineering cost delivery documents based on the data determined after a certain prediction are substantially verified, so as to judge the accuracy of the partial engineering cost delivery documents based on the data determined after a certain prediction; therefore, a prediction depth analysis is performed on the remaining comparison verification documents after the strength substantive verification documents are extracted from the comparison verification documents, wherein the prediction depth analysis includes the analysis of the volatility of the cost documents, the diversity of the prediction results, the prediction method used in the prediction, the training degree of the prediction model, and the instability of the influencing factors; the volatility of the cost documents, the diversity of the prediction results, the prediction method used in the prediction, the training degree of the prediction model, and the instability of the influencing factors are compared with the corresponding preset thresholds to obtain the prediction depth analysis results.

[0047] S2302: Extracting deep substantive verification documents from the remaining comparison verification documents based on the predicted depth analysis results.

[0048] Specifically, according to the predicted depth analysis results, the parts of the comparison and verification documents that are greater than the corresponding threshold are extracted from the remaining comparison and verification documents as deep substantive verification documents, that is, cost documents that need to be substantively verified based on the predicted depth analysis judgment.

[0049] It should be noted that when comparing the volatility of the cost documents obtained through analysis, the diversity of the prediction results, the prediction methods used during prediction, the degree of training of the prediction model, and the instability of the influencing factors with the corresponding preset thresholds, the threshold used is the threshold that matches the current cost project type, that is, the thresholds corresponding to different types of cost projects are different, because the average labor intensity of different types of cost projects is different. Therefore, the corresponding matching threshold is used to ensure the accuracy of the cost work intensity analysis results.

[0050] S2303: Merge the deep substantive verification file into the substantive verification file.

[0051] Specifically, the deep substantive verification document is merged into the substantive verification document, so that when the accuracy verification is performed, the deep substantive verification document and the substantive verification document are substantially verified.

[0052] In one embodiment, if Figure 6 As shown, in step S30: substantially verifying the substantial verification document, before obtaining the substantial verification result, the individual business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project also includes: S330: Analyze the comparison and verification documents to obtain format template information representing the template used for the comparison and verification documents, and user portrait information representing the user's cost work characteristics.

[0053] In this embodiment, the user portrait information refers to the characteristic information of the user's working habits when performing cost estimation work.

[0054] Specifically, when the substantive verification documents and comparative verification documents are divided based on the preset substantive verification rules, the engineering cost results documents that use fixed templates and format clauses will be divided into comparative verification documents, because this part of the engineering cost results documents will basically not change significantly, so the historical templates and clauses can be used. However, in actual applications, due to factors such as policy changes, the fixed templates and format clauses may also need to change accordingly. If the cost engineer fails to respond in time or uses incorrect fixed templates and format clauses, the engineering cost results documents will have a greater risk of errors; Therefore, on the first hand, the comparison and verification documents are analyzed and compared to determine the types of fixed templates and format clauses used in the comparison and verification documents, and the format template information indicating the types of fixed templates and format clauses used in the comparison and verification documents is obtained. On the second hand, different cost engineers have different habits when compiling engineering cost results documents, such as the layout of the page, the selection of fonts, the adjustment of line spacing and other format and typesetting habits, the habits in data organization and presentation, the use of professional software, and the selection habits of equipment types and material types. By analyzing the relevant characteristics of the cost documents, it can be determined whether the user has performed the cost work seriously and whether it is performed by the cost engineer himself. Therefore, the comparison and verification documents are analyzed and compared to determine the user portrait information of the user who currently prepares the comparison and verification documents from the layout of the page, the selection of fonts, the adjustment of line spacing and other format and typesetting habits, the habits in data organization and presentation, the use of professional software, and the selection habits of equipment types and material types. The user portrait information refers to the characteristic information of the user's work habits when performing cost work.

[0055] S430: Determine the adaptability of the format template information to the current cost engineering project, and obtain template adaptability information.

[0056] Specifically, the adaptability of the format template information to the current cost engineering can be determined. The adaptability of the format template information to the current cost engineering can be reflected in many aspects. For example, on the first aspect, the number of times the fixed templates and format clauses are used is determined. The more times they are used, the more commonly such fixed templates and format clauses are used, and the greater the probability of finding unreasonableness in practice. Therefore, the engineering cost results documents corresponding to the fixed templates and format clauses that have been used many times and have not changed for a long time can be substantially verified to determine the accuracy of the engineering cost results documents. Based on this, the number of times the format template information is used and the length of time it has not changed are compared with the corresponding preset thresholds to obtain the adaptability of the format template information in terms of template use to the current cost engineering. On the other hand, according to the current cost The information of the project and the construction engineering project is used to judge the adaptability of the types of fixed templates and format clauses to the current cost projects and construction engineering projects, including whether the format template information complies with the format requirements and normative requirements of the current cost projects and construction engineering projects, as well as the relevant laws and regulations of the current region and industry, and whether the format template information covers all the content required for the current cost project, for example, whether it contains all the necessary cost tables, whether the special requirements of the project are taken into account, etc. In this way, the adaptability of the format template information to the current cost engineering is judged in terms of the content of the template; the adaptability of the format template information to the current cost engineering in terms of the use of the template and the adaptability of the format template information to the current cost engineering in terms of the content of the template are combined to obtain the template adaptability information.

[0057] S530: Extracting a comparison substantive verification document from the comparison verification document based on the user portrait information and the template adaptability information.

[0058] Specifically, the historical portrait information corresponding to the cost engineer who is currently applying for personal business settlement is extracted. The historical portrait information refers to the work habit feature information of the cost engineer who is currently applying for personal business settlement, which is judged through the historical cost work of the cost engineer. Therefore, the historical portrait information is compared with the user portrait information. For the comparison and verification documents where the user portrait information does not correspond to the historical portrait information, it can be judged that the user did not perform the cost work seriously or it was not performed by the cost engineer himself. Therefore, the comparison and verification documents corresponding to the user portrait information that is different from the historical portrait information are used as the comparison substantive verification documents. Then, based on the template adaptability information, the comparison verification document in which the format template information in terms of template usage and the adaptability of the current cost project are lower than the corresponding preset threshold value will be used as the comparison substantive verification document, and the comparison verification document in which the format template information in terms of template content and the adaptability of the current cost project are lower than the corresponding preset threshold value will be used as the comparison substantive verification document.

[0059] S630: Merge the comparative substantive verification document into the substantive verification document.

[0060] Specifically, the comparative substantive verification document is merged into the substantive verification document, so that when the accuracy verification is performed, the comparative substantive verification document and the substantive verification document are substantially verified.

[0061] In one embodiment, if Figure 7 As shown, in step S40, according to the substantive verification result and the comparative verification result, an accuracy verification score is obtained, which specifically includes: S41: Calculate the ratio of the substantive verification documents to the engineering cost results documents, and determine the substantive verification scoring rules corresponding to the substantive verification results based on the ratio.

[0062] Specifically, after completing the substantial verification and comparative verification, it is necessary to comprehensively evaluate the results of the substantial verification and the comparative verification for accuracy, and determine the individual operating settlement results of the cost engineer based on the accuracy score. When determining the accuracy score of the cost engineer, it is necessary to determine it based on the corresponding rules, because when determining the individual operating settlement results of the cost engineer, it is necessary to determine the deduction ratio of the individual operating settlement based on the accuracy score. However, each engineering cost project and construction project is different, and each engineering cost project has different workloads and difficulties, and different degrees of error. If different cost engineers for each different engineering cost project are scored based on the same scoring rules, it will be unfair to the cost engineers. Therefore, the ratio of substantial verification documents to engineering cost results documents is calculated. The ratio of substantial verification documents to engineering cost results documents can indicate the different error-proneness of cost projects. The higher the ratio of substantial verification documents to engineering cost results documents, the higher the labor intensity of cost engineers when conducting cost estimation, the higher the complexity and detail of forecasting, and the higher the requirements for current cost projects. Therefore, the error-proneness of current cost projects is also higher, and the reasonable error range of cost engineers when conducting cost estimation should also be larger. Based on this, the substantive verification scoring rules corresponding to the substantive verification results are determined according to the ratio of substantive verification documents to engineering cost results documents. For example, when the ratio of substantive verification documents to engineering cost results documents is high, no penalty will be imposed if the error rate is within 2%. When the ratio of substantive verification documents to engineering cost results documents is low, a penalty may be imposed if the error rate is greater than 1%.

[0063] S42: Obtain an accuracy verification score based on preset comparative verification scoring rules and substantive verification scoring rules.

[0064] Specifically, the accuracy verification score is obtained by combining the preset comparative verification scoring rules and substantive verification scoring rules, as well as the substantive verification results and comparative verification results.

[0065] It should be understood that the size of the serial numbers of the steps in the above embodiments does not mean the order of execution. The execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of the present application.

[0066] In one embodiment, a personal operating settlement system applied to engineering cost projects is provided, and the personal operating settlement system applied to engineering cost projects corresponds one-to-one with the personal operating settlement method applied to engineering cost projects in the above embodiment. Figure 8 As shown, the personal business settlement system applied to engineering cost projects includes a field division module, a substance division module, a verification module, an accuracy scoring module, a timeliness scoring module and a settlement module. The detailed description of each functional module is as follows: The field division module is used to determine the user responsible files for the user's personal business settlement from the engineering cost results files based on the preset field division rules; A substantive division module is used to divide the user's responsible files into substantive verification files and comparative verification files based on preset substantive verification rules; The verification module is used to perform substantial verification on the substantial verification documents to obtain substantial verification results, and to perform comparative verification on the comparative verification documents to obtain comparative verification results; An accuracy scoring module, used to obtain an accuracy verification score based on the substantive verification results and the comparative verification results; The timeliness scoring module is used to judge the timeliness of the engineering cost result documents based on the preset timeliness scoring rules and obtain the timeliness score; The settlement module is used to obtain the user's personal business settlement results based on the accuracy verification score and timeliness score.

[0067] Optional, personal business settlement system applied to engineering cost projects also includes: Strength analysis module, used to analyze the cost work strength of the comparison and verification documents and obtain the cost work strength analysis results; Strength extraction module, used to extract the strength substantive verification documents from the comparison verification documents according to the strength analysis results of the cost work; The strength merging module is used to merge the strength substantive verification file into the substantive verification file.

[0068] Optional, personal business settlement system applied to engineering cost projects also includes: A prediction depth analysis module is used to perform a prediction depth analysis on the remaining comparison and verification documents after extracting the strength substantive verification documents from the comparison and verification documents to obtain a prediction depth analysis result; A predicted depth extraction module, used to extract deep substantive verification documents from the remaining comparison verification documents according to the predicted depth analysis results; The predicted depth merge module is used to merge the deep substantive verification file into the substantive verification file.

[0069] Optional, personal business settlement system applied to engineering cost projects also includes: A comparison file analysis module is used to analyze the comparison verification file, obtain the format template information of the template used for the comparison verification file, and the user portrait information representing the characteristics of the user's cost work; Adaptability analysis module, used to determine the adaptability of format template information to the current cost engineering and obtain template adaptability information; A comparison and extraction module, used to extract a comparison substantive verification document from the comparison and verification document based on the user portrait information and the template adaptability information; The comparison and merging module is used to merge the comparison substantive verification file into the substantive verification file.

[0070] Optional, accuracy scoring modules include: The rule determination submodule is used to calculate the ratio of the substantive verification documents to the engineering cost results documents, and determine the substantive verification scoring rules corresponding to the substantive verification results according to the ratio; The scoring submodule is used to obtain the accuracy verification score based on the preset comparative verification scoring rules and substantive verification scoring rules.

[0071] For the specific definition of the personal business settlement system applied to engineering cost projects, please refer to the definition of the personal business settlement method applied to engineering cost projects above, which will not be repeated here. Each module in the above-mentioned personal business settlement system applied to engineering cost projects can be implemented in whole or in part through software, hardware and their combination. The above-mentioned modules can be embedded in or independent of the processor in the computer device in the form of hardware, or can be stored in the memory of the computer device in the form of software, so that the processor can call and execute the operations corresponding to the above modules.

[0072] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided. The computer device may be a server, and its internal structure diagram may be as follows: Fig. 9 As shown. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a network interface and a database connected through a system bus. Among them, the processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The database of the computer device is used to store user responsible files, substantive verification files, comparative verification files, comparative verification results, substantive verification results, accuracy verification scores, timeliness scores and user personal business settlement results. The network interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal through a network connection. When the computer program is executed by the processor, a personal business settlement method applied to engineering cost projects is implemented.

[0073] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the following steps when executing the computer program: Based on the preset field division rules, determine the user responsible files for the user's personal business settlement from the engineering cost results files; Based on the preset substantive verification rules, the user's responsible files are divided into substantive verification files and comparative verification files; Conducting substantial verification on the substantial verification documents to obtain substantial verification results, and conducting comparative verification on the comparative verification documents to obtain comparative verification results; Obtain accuracy verification scores based on the substantive verification results and comparative verification results; Based on the preset timeliness scoring rules, judge the timeliness of the engineering cost results documents and obtain the timeliness score; Based on the accuracy verification score and timeliness score, the user's personal business settlement results are obtained.

[0074] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented: Based on the preset field division rules, determine the user responsible files for the user's personal business settlement from the engineering cost results files; Based on the preset substantive verification rules, the user's responsible files are divided into substantive verification files and comparative verification files; Conducting substantial verification on the substantial verification documents to obtain substantial verification results, and conducting comparative verification on the comparative verification documents to obtain comparative verification results; Obtain accuracy verification scores based on the substantive verification results and comparative verification results; Based on the preset timeliness scoring rules, judge the timeliness of the engineering cost results documents and obtain the timeliness score; Based on the accuracy verification score and timeliness score, the user's personal business settlement results are obtained.

[0075] Those of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment methods can be implemented by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to memory, storage, database or other media used in the embodiments provided in this application may include non-volatile and / or volatile memory. Non-volatile memory may include read-only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM) or flash memory. Volatile memory may include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in many forms, such as static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous link (Synchlink) DRAM (SLDRAM), memory bus (Rambus) direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and memory bus dynamic RAM (RDRAM), etc.

[0076] Those skilled in the art will clearly understand that for the sake of convenience and brevity of description, only the division of the above-mentioned functional units and modules is used as an example. In actual applications, the above-mentioned functions can be distributed and completed by different functional units and modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the system can be divided into different functional units or modules to complete all or part of the functions described above.

[0077] The embodiments described above are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present application, rather than to limit them. Although the present application has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, a person skilled in the art should understand that the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments may still be modified, or some of the technical features may be replaced by equivalents. Such modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, and should all be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A personal business settlement method applied to engineering cost projects, characterized in that: The individual business settlement methods applied to engineering cost projects include: Based on the preset field division rules, determine the user responsible files for the user's personal business settlement from the engineering cost results files; Based on the preset substantive verification rules, the user's responsible files are divided into substantive verification files and comparative verification files; Performing a substantial verification on the substantial verification document to obtain a substantial verification result, and performing a comparative verification on the comparative verification document to obtain a comparative verification result; Obtaining an accuracy verification score based on the substantive verification result and the comparative verification result; Based on the preset timeliness scoring rules, the timeliness of the engineering cost result document is judged to obtain a timeliness score; Based on the accuracy verification score and the timeliness score, the user's personal business settlement result is obtained.

2. The personal business settlement method applied to engineering cost projects according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Before substantially verifying the substantial verification documents and obtaining the substantial verification results, the individual business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project also includes: Performing a cost work intensity analysis on the comparison and verification documents to obtain a cost work intensity analysis result; According to the cost work intensity analysis result, extracting the intensity substantive verification document from the comparative verification document; The strength substantive verification document is merged into the substantive verification document.

3. The personal business settlement method applied to engineering cost projects according to claim 2 is characterized in that: After the strength substantive verification document is merged into the substantive verification document, the individual business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project further includes: Performing a predicted depth analysis on the remaining comparison and verification documents after extracting the strength substantive verification documents from the comparison and verification documents to obtain a predicted depth analysis result; Extracting deep substantive verification documents from the remaining comparison verification documents according to the predicted deep analysis results; The deep substantive verification file is merged into the substantive verification file.

4. The personal business settlement method applied to engineering cost projects according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Before substantially verifying the substantial verification documents and obtaining the substantial verification results, the individual business settlement method applied to the engineering cost project also includes: Analyze the comparison and verification file to obtain format template information representing the template used by the comparison and verification file, and user portrait information representing the cost work characteristics of the user; Determining the adaptability of the format template information to the current cost engineering project, and obtaining template adaptability information; Extracting a comparison substantive verification document from the comparison verification document based on the user portrait information and the template adaptability information; The compared substantial verification document is merged into the substantial verification document.

5. The personal business settlement method applied to engineering cost projects according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that: The obtaining of the accuracy verification score according to the substantive verification result and the comparative verification result specifically includes: Calculating the ratio of the substantive verification document to the engineering cost results document, and determining a substantive verification scoring rule corresponding to the substantive verification result according to the ratio; Based on the preset comparative verification scoring rules and the substantive verification scoring rules, an accuracy verification score is obtained.

6. A personal business settlement system applied to engineering cost projects, characterized in that: The personal business settlement system applied to the engineering cost project includes: The field division module is used to determine the user responsible files for the user's personal business settlement from the engineering cost results files based on the preset field division rules; A substantive division module, used to divide the user's responsible files into substantive verification files and comparative verification files based on preset substantive verification rules; A verification module, used to perform a substantial verification on the substantial verification document to obtain a substantial verification result, and to perform a comparative verification on the comparative verification document to obtain a comparative verification result; An accuracy scoring module, used to obtain an accuracy verification score according to the substantive verification result and the comparative verification result; A timeliness scoring module is used to determine the timeliness of the engineering cost result document based on a preset timeliness scoring rule and obtain a timeliness score; The settlement module is used to obtain the user's personal business settlement result based on the accuracy verification score and the timeliness score.

7. The personal business settlement system for engineering cost projects according to claim 6 is characterized in that: The personal business settlement system applied to the engineering cost project also includes: A strength analysis module, used to perform a cost work strength analysis on the comparison and verification documents to obtain a cost work strength analysis result; A strength extraction module, used to extract a strength substantive verification document from the comparison verification document according to the cost work strength analysis result; A strength merging module is used to merge the strength substantive verification file into the substantive verification file.

8. The personal business settlement system applied to engineering cost projects according to claim 7 is characterized in that: The personal business settlement system applied to the engineering cost project also includes: A prediction depth analysis module, used to perform a prediction depth analysis on the comparison and verification files remaining after the strength substantive verification files are extracted from the comparison and verification files, and obtain a prediction depth analysis result; A predicted depth extraction module, used to extract deep substantive verification documents from the remaining comparison verification documents according to the predicted depth analysis result; A predicted depth merging module is used to merge the deep substantive verification file into the substantive verification file.

9. A computer device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that: When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the personal business settlement method applied to engineering cost projects as described in any one of claims 1 to 5 are implemented.

10. A computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the personal business settlement method applied to an engineering cost project as described in any one of claims 1 to 5 are implemented.

Images