Equipment standardization evaluation method and device, computer equipment and readable storage medium

Abstract

The invention relates to an equipment standardization evaluation method and device, computer equipment, a computer readable storage medium and a computer program product. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring related data of a to-be-tested device at each stage; the stages comprise a scheme stage, an engineering development stage and a state identification stage; the related data refers to evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the to-be-tested equipment; performing quantitative rating on the related data according to preset evaluation indexes to obtain a rating result of each evaluation index of the to-be-tested equipment; and evaluating the to-be-tested equipment based on the rating result. By adopting the method, the accuracy of equipment evaluation can be improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of standardization evaluation, and in particular to an equipment standardization evaluation method, apparatus, computer device, computer-readable storage medium, and computer program product. Background Art

[0002] Equipment standardization is an important part of equipment construction, which mainly includes the formulation of equipment standards, the implementation of standards, the supervision of the implementation of standards, and the promotion of the standardization, serialization and combination of equipment. Equipment standardization assessment is the last link of equipment standardization work, which is a comprehensive assessment of the standardization work of equipment development units and the degree of equipment standardization. Equipment standardization assessment work ensures the correct implementation of standardization and confirms the benefits brought by standardization in the equipment development process.

[0003] At present, the equipment standardization assessment is carried out according to TE-BTBC-024-2021 "Guidelines for the Preparation of Equipment Identification and Finalization Documents Part 23: Standardization Assessment Report", which is evaluated from five aspects: standardization work, implementation of standards, equipment "three transformations", applicability of technical data, and consistency of technical status. However, this assessment method still has shortcomings. This method is a qualitative assessment and does not combine indicators with actual quantitative data of equipment. The assessment results are greatly affected by subjective factors. For equipment in different fields, the basis for assessment is inconsistent, which ultimately leads to insufficient accuracy of the assessment results. Summary of the invention

[0004] Based on this, it is necessary to provide an equipment standardization assessment method, device, computer equipment, computer-readable storage medium and computer program product that can accurately assess equipment standardization in response to the above-mentioned technical problems.

[0005] In a first aspect, the present application provides an equipment standardization evaluation method, comprising:

[0006] Obtain relevant data for each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status assessment stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the equipment to be tested;

[0007] Quantitatively rating the relevant data according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested;

[0008] Based on the rating result, the equipment to be tested is evaluated.

[0009] In one embodiment, the relevant data includes data on the establishment of a standardization work organization for the equipment to be tested, data on the construction of a standardization document system, and data on the processing of standardization review issues; accordingly, the relevant data is quantitatively rated according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain a rating result for each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including:

[0010] Based on the establishment data, determining a rating result of the standardization work organization;

[0011] Based on the construction data, determining a rating result of the construction of the standardized document system;

[0012] Based on the processed data, the completion rate of the standardized review questions is calculated, and according to the size of the completion rate and the review data of the standardized review questions, the rating results of the standardized review questions are determined; the processed data includes the review data.

[0013] In one embodiment, the relevant data includes the standard system construction data of the equipment to be tested, the standard selection and tailoring data of the equipment to be tested, the special specification compilation and implementation data of the equipment to be tested, and the implementation benefit evaluation data of the standard implementation of the equipment to be tested; accordingly, the relevant data is quantitatively rated according to the preset evaluation indicators to obtain the rating results of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including:

[0014] Determining a rating result of the construction of the standard system of the equipment to be tested based on the standard system construction data;

[0015] Determining a rating result of the standard selection and tailoring of the equipment to be tested based on the standard selection and tailoring data;

[0016] Based on the special specification preparation and implementation data, calculating the implementation rate of the special specification preparation of the equipment to be tested, and determining the rating result of the special specification preparation and implementation of the equipment to be tested according to the implementation rate and the completeness data of the content of the special specification of the equipment to be tested; the special specification preparation and implementation data includes the completeness data;

[0017] Based on the standard implementation benefit evaluation data, a rating result of the implementation benefit of the standard of the equipment to be tested is determined.

[0018] In one embodiment, the relevant data includes extended data of module combinations and interfaces of different versions of the equipment to be tested, usage data of devices and interfaces of the equipment to be tested, and field replaceable unit data of the equipment to be tested; accordingly, the relevant data are quantitatively rated according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including:

[0019] Based on the extended data, determining rating results of module combinations and interface serialization designs of different versions of the equipment to be tested;

[0020] Based on the usage data, determining a universal usage rating result of the device and interface of the equipment to be tested;

[0021] Based on the line replaceable unit data, the proportion of the line replaceable units in the equipment to be tested is calculated, and according to the size of the proportion, the rating result of the combined design of the equipment to be tested is determined.

[0022] In one embodiment, the relevant data includes technical data of the equipment to be tested and questionnaire results on the completeness, accuracy and validity of the technical data; accordingly, the relevant data is quantitatively rated according to the preset evaluation indicators to obtain the rating results of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including:

[0023] Based on the technical data data, calculating the completeness rate of the technical data of the equipment to be tested, and determining the rating result of the completeness of the technical data of the equipment to be tested according to the size of the completeness rate of the technical data;

[0024] Based on the questionnaire results, the rating results of the completeness, accuracy and effectiveness of the technical data of the equipment to be tested are determined.

[0025] In one embodiment, the relevant data includes technical status file data of the equipment to be tested, software data of the equipment to be tested, and hardware data of the equipment to be tested; accordingly, the relevant data are quantitatively rated according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain the rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including:

[0026] Based on the technical status file data, the consistency rate of the technical status file of the equipment to be tested is calculated, and according to the size of the consistency rate of the technical status file, a rating result of the consistency of the technical status file of the equipment to be tested is determined;

[0027] Based on the software data, the consistency rate between the software of the equipment to be tested and the software in the preset software list is calculated, and the rating result of the software of the equipment to be tested is determined according to the consistency rate between the software of the equipment to be tested and the software in the preset software list;

[0028] Based on the hardware data, the consistency rate between the hardware of the equipment to be tested and the hardware in the preset hardware list is calculated, and the rating result of the hardware of the equipment to be tested is determined according to the consistency rate between the hardware of the equipment to be tested and the hardware in the preset hardware list.

[0029] In one embodiment, the method further comprises:

[0030] When at least one item in the rating results does not meet the preset condition, the equipment to be tested is improved.

[0031] In a second aspect, the present application also provides an equipment standardization evaluation device, comprising:

[0032] An acquisition module is used to acquire relevant data of each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status evaluation stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the equipment to be tested;

[0033] A rating module, used to perform quantitative rating on the relevant data according to preset evaluation indicators, and obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested;

[0034] An evaluation module is used to evaluate the equipment to be tested based on the rating result.

[0035] In a third aspect, the present application further provides a computer device, including a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are implemented:

[0036] Obtain relevant data for each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status assessment stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the equipment to be tested;

[0037] Quantitatively rating the relevant data according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested;

[0038] Based on the rating result, the equipment to be tested is evaluated.

[0039] In a fourth aspect, the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, wherein when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0040] Obtain relevant data for each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status assessment stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the equipment to be tested;

[0041] Quantitatively rating the relevant data according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested;

[0042] Based on the rating result, the equipment to be tested is evaluated.

[0043] In a fifth aspect, the present application further provides a computer program product, including a computer program, which implements the following steps when executed by a processor:

[0044] Obtain relevant data for each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status assessment stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the equipment to be tested;

[0045] Quantitatively rating the relevant data according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested;

[0046] Based on the rating result, the equipment to be tested is evaluated.

[0047] The above-mentioned equipment standardization evaluation method, device, computer equipment, computer-readable storage medium and computer program product first obtain relevant data of each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status identification stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the evaluation process of the equipment to be tested; the relevant data is quantitatively rated according to the preset evaluation index to obtain the rating result of each evaluation index of the equipment to be tested; based on the rating result, the equipment to be tested is evaluated. In this way, by quantifying the evaluation index on the basis of the existing equipment evaluation method, a unified evaluation basis is given for equipment in different fields, and standardized evaluation of equipment in different fields is achieved, so that the final evaluation result is more accurate. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0048] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application or related technologies, the drawings required for use in the embodiments of the present application or related technical descriptions will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other related drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.

[0049] Figure 1 A diagram of an application environment for a standardized evaluation method for equipment in one embodiment;

[0050] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a process flow of a method for equipment standardization evaluation in one embodiment;

[0051] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of evaluation indicators preset in an equipment standardization method in one embodiment;

[0052] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of a flow chart of a method for equipment standardization evaluation in another embodiment;

[0053] Figure 5 A structural block diagram of a standardized evaluation device in one embodiment;

[0054] Figure 6 FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the internal structure of a computer device in one embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0055] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the present application more clearly understood, the present application is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present application and are not used to limit the present application.

[0056] The equipment standardization evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application can be applied to Figure 1 In the application environment shown. Among them, the terminal 102 communicates with the server 104 through the network. The data storage system can store the data that the server 104 needs to process. The data storage system can be integrated on the server 104, or it can be placed on the cloud or other network servers. Among them, the terminal 102 can be, but is not limited to, various personal computers, laptops, smart phones, tablets, Internet of Things devices and portable wearable devices. The Internet of Things devices can be smart speakers, smart TVs, smart air conditioners, smart car devices, projection devices, etc. Portable wearable devices can be smart watches, smart bracelets, head-mounted devices, etc. The head-mounted device can be a virtual reality (VR) device, an augmented reality (AR) device, smart glasses, etc. The server 104 can be an independent physical server, a server cluster or distributed system composed of multiple physical servers, or a cloud server that provides cloud computing services.

[0057] In an exemplary embodiment, Figure 2 As shown in the figure, a method for evaluating equipment standardization is provided. Figure 1 The terminal 102 in the example is used as an example to illustrate, including the following steps 202 to 206. Among them:

[0058] Step 202, obtaining relevant data of each stage of the equipment to be tested.

[0059] Among them, the stages include the scheme stage, engineering development stage and status assessment stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data needed to be used in the evaluation process of the equipment to be tested.

[0060] Exemplarily, the terminal obtains the evaluation index data required for the equipment under test in the scheme stage, engineering development stage and status identification stage in the entire evaluation process through at least one of the preset methods. Among them, the preset methods include document review, comparative analysis, statistical analysis and questionnaire survey; the scheme stage refers to the scheme design stage of the equipment under test, the engineering development stage refers to the stage of production testing of the equipment under test, and the status identification stage refers to the stage of studying the status of the equipment under test throughout the process.

[0061] Step 204: quantify and rate the relevant data according to the preset evaluation indexes to obtain the rating result of each evaluation index of the equipment to be tested.

[0062] The preset evaluation indicators are as follows: Figure 3 As shown, there are five first-level indicators and fifteen second-level indicators. The five first-level indicators are standardization work, standard implementation, equipment "three transformations", technical data applicability and technical status consistency. Each first-level indicator is subdivided into at least two second-level indicators. The first-level indicator standardization work corresponds to three second-level indicators, namely the establishment and operation of standardization work organization, the establishment of standardization document system and implementation effect, and standardization review and problem closure; the first-level indicator standard implementation corresponds to four second-level indicators, namely the construction of standard system, standard selection and major standard tailoring and implementation, special specification compilation and implementation, and standard implementation benefit evaluation; the first-level indicator equipment "three transformations" corresponds to three second-level indicators, namely serialization, generalization and combination; the first-level indicator technical data applicability corresponds to two second-level indicators, namely completeness and completeness, accuracy and effectiveness; the first-level indicator technical status consistency corresponds to three second-level indicators, namely technical status document consistency, software technical status consistency and hardware technical status consistency.

[0063] Specifically, the terminal performs quantitative rating on the relevant data according to the preset evaluation indicators, and obtains the rating results of each secondary evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested. The rating results are divided into three levels: "good", "relatively good" and "bad".

[0064] Step 206: Evaluate the equipment to be tested based on the rating result.

[0065] Exemplarily, the terminal evaluates the equipment to be tested according to the obtained rating result.

[0066] In some embodiments, the preset method for collecting relevant data corresponding to each secondary evaluation indicator is shown in Table 1.

[0067] Table 1 Preset methods for relevant data collection

[0068]

[0069] In the above equipment standardization evaluation method, relevant data of each stage of the equipment to be tested is obtained; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status identification stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation indicator data required to be used in the evaluation process of the equipment to be tested; the relevant data is quantitatively rated according to the preset evaluation indicators to obtain the rating results of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested; based on the rating results, the equipment to be tested is evaluated. In this way, by quantifying the evaluation indicators on the basis of the existing equipment evaluation method, a unified evaluation basis is given for equipment in different fields, and standardized evaluation of equipment in different fields is achieved, making the final evaluation results more accurate.

[0070] In an exemplary embodiment, the relevant data includes data on establishing a standardization work organization for the equipment to be tested, data on constructing a standardization document system, and data on processing standardization review issues; accordingly, the relevant data is quantitatively rated according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain rating results for each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including: determining the rating results of the standardization work organization based on the establishment data; determining the rating results of the construction of the standardization document system based on the construction data; calculating the completion rate of the standardization review issues based on the processing data, and determining the rating results of the standardization review issues based on the completion rate and the review data of the standardization issues; the processing data includes the review data.

[0071] Among them, the data on the establishment of the standardization work organization for the equipment to be tested include the standardization of the establishment of the organizational structure, the formulation of the work system and the coordination of standardization issues; the data on the construction of the standardization document system include the completeness of the standardization document system table, the completeness of the standardization document compilation and the dynamic management of the standardization documents at each stage; the data on the handling of standardization review issues include the organization of the standardization review at each stage and the closed-loop status of the standardization review opinions at each stage.

[0072] In some embodiments, the document review method is adopted to check whether the equipment to be tested and the supporting products have established an organization for standardization work according to the establishment norms of the organization; according to the formulation of the work system, check whether the relevant work system for the standardization work organization to carry out the work has been formulated, and whether the standardization responsibilities of the organization are clear to each member; check the coordination of standardization issues, and count the total number of standardization issues of the equipment to be tested at each stage , the total number of standardization opinions proposed by organizations , the total number of closed loops of standard issues coordinated by organizations , calculate the proportion of standardization issues coordinated by organizations The specific calculation formula is shown in (1), and the completion rate of standardization issues coordinated by the organization is calculated. , the specific calculation formula is shown in (2). The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 2.

[0073]

[0074]

[0075] Table 2 Rating criteria for the establishment and operation of standardization work organizations

[0076]

[0077] The rating results of the organization are determined based on the above data, which corresponds to the rating results of the establishment and operation of the standardization work organization of the secondary evaluation indicators.

[0078] In some embodiments, the integrity of the standardization document system table is checked. According to the requirements of "5.5.2 Standardization Document System Table" in GJB / Z 114A-2015 "Guidelines for the Preparation of Product Standardization Outlines", a comparative analysis method is used to compare and analyze whether the contents of the standardization document system table include four categories: standardization management documents, standardization technical documents, standardization review documents, and standardization information materials. Whether the parts of these standardization documents that need to be separately compiled or dynamically managed in the scheme stage, engineering development stage, and status identification stage are marked; Check the integrity of the preparation of standardization documents, and use the document review method to count the total number of completed standardization documents , the total number of standardized documents in the standardized document system table of equipment , calculate the standardized document completion rate , the specific calculation formula is shown in (3); check the dynamic management of standardization documents at each stage, and use the document review method to check whether the standardization documents are dynamically managed in accordance with the requirements of each stage of the equipment standardization document system table. The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 3.

[0079]

[0080] Table 3: Standardization document system establishment and implementation effect rating criteria

[0081]

[0082] Based on the above data, the rating results of the construction of the standardized document system are determined, corresponding to the rating results of the establishment and implementation effects of the standardized document system of the secondary evaluation indicators.

[0083] In some embodiments, the organization of standardization review at each stage is checked by document review. According to GJB / Z 113-1998 "Standardization Review", it is checked whether the standardization review of each stage of the equipment is organized separately or in combination with other review activities; the closed loop of standardization review opinions at each stage is checked, and the total number of standardization issues generated by standardization review is counted according to different stages. , the number of closed loops of standardization issues generated by standardization review , calculate the closed-loop rate of standardized issues generated by standardized review, i.e. the completion rate , the specific calculation formula is shown in (4). The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 4.

[0084]

[0085] Table 4 Standardization review and problem closure rating criteria

[0086]

[0087] The rating results of the standardized review issues are determined based on the above data, corresponding to the rating results of the standardized review of the secondary evaluation indicators and the closure of the problem.

[0088] In the above embodiment, by subdividing the first-level evaluation index standardization work and then performing the rating, a more accurate rating result can be obtained.

[0089] In an exemplary embodiment, the relevant data include standard system construction data of the equipment to be tested, standard selection and tailoring data of the equipment to be tested, special specification compilation and implementation data of the equipment to be tested, and implementation benefit evaluation data of the standard implementation of the equipment to be tested; accordingly, the relevant data are quantitatively rated according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain rating results of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including: based on the standard system construction data, determining the rating results of the standard system construction of the equipment to be tested; based on the standard selection and tailoring data, determining the rating results of the standard selection and tailoring of the equipment to be tested; based on the special specification compilation and implementation data, calculating the implementation rate of the special specification compilation of the equipment to be tested, and determining the rating results of the special specification compilation and implementation of the equipment to be tested according to the implementation rate and the completeness data of the special specification content of the equipment to be tested; the special specification compilation and implementation data include completeness data; based on the implementation benefit evaluation data, determining the rating results of the implementation benefit of the standard implementation of the equipment to be tested.

[0090] Among them, the standard system construction data of the equipment to be tested includes the completeness of the standard system structure diagram and standard detailed table, and the standards above the industry in the standard system table; the standard selection and tailoring data of the equipment to be tested includes the formulation of the standard selection scope, the compilation of the standard selection list, the standards covered in the standardization requirements in the standard selection list, the tailoring of major standards, the implementation of major standards, and the closed-loop review opinions on the implementation of standards such as non-implementation of standards and unreasonable tailoring in each stage of standardization review; the special specification compilation and implementation data of the equipment to be tested includes the implementation of various special specifications compiled and the completeness of the content of various special specifications; the implementation benefit evaluation data of the standard implementation of the equipment to be tested includes the implementation effect of the standard in the production process and the level of the standardization coefficient of the equipment to be tested.

[0091] In some embodiments, the integrity of the standard system structure diagram and standard detailed list is checked. According to GB / T13016-2018 "Principles and Requirements for Standard System Construction", the document review method is used to check whether the standard system structure diagram and standard detailed list are included; the industry standards and above in the standard system table are checked, and the number of industry standards and above in the standard system table is counted by statistical analysis. , all standard quantities in the standard system table Calculate the proportion of industry-level standards in the standard system table , the specific calculation formula is shown in (5). The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 5.

[0092]

[0093] Table 5 Rating criteria for standard system construction

[0094]

[0095] Based on the above data, the rating results of the construction of the standard system for the equipment to be tested are determined, corresponding to the rating results of the construction of the secondary evaluation indicator standard system.

[0096] In some embodiments, the document review method is used to check the scope of standard selection; check the compilation of the standard selection list and count the total number of selected standards. ; Check whether the standards in the standardization requirements are included in the standard selection list; Check the major standard tailoring situation, and count the number of major standard tailorings according to GJB / Z 69-1994 "Guidelines for the Selection and Tailoring of Military Standards" , calculate the significant standard clipping rate , the specific calculation formula is shown in (6); check the implementation of major standards, check whether the relevant technical documents have implemented major standards through clear provisions, clear work items, extracting specific content, compiling exception lists, etc., and count the total number of major standards , number of major standards implemented , calculate the implementation rate of major standards , the specific calculation formula is shown in (7); check the closed loop of review opinions on the implementation of standards such as non-implementation of standards and unreasonable tailoring in each stage of standardization review, and count the total number of standard implementation issues such as non-implementation of standards and unreasonable tailoring in the review opinions according to different stages , the number of closed-loop issues in standardization review and implementation , calculate the closed-loop rate of implementation issues of standardized review standards , the specific calculation formula is shown in (8). The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 6.

[0097]

[0098]

[0099]

[0100] Table 6 Rating criteria for standard selection and major standard tailoring implementation

[0101]

[0102] Based on the above data, the rating results of the selection and tailoring of standards for the equipment to be tested are determined, as well as the rating results of the selection of secondary evaluation indicator standards and the implementation of major standard tailoring.

[0103] In one embodiment, a document review method is used to check the implementation of various special specifications compiled, and the number of special specifications actually written is checked. , calculate the completion rate of the special specification , the specific calculation formula is shown in formula (9); check the completeness of the content of various special specifications, and check whether the content of the special specifications actually written contains the requirements for the content of various special specifications in GJB6387-2008 "Regulations on the Preparation of Special Specifications for Weapon Equipment Development Projects". The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 7.

[0104]

[0105] in, It is the number of equipment-specific specifications that need to be written. According to the requirements of GJB 6387-2008 "Regulations on the Preparation of Special Specifications for Weapon Equipment Development Projects", it includes six categories: system specifications, development specifications, product specifications, process specifications, material specifications, and software specifications.

[0106] Table 7 Rating criteria for the preparation and implementation of special specifications

[0107]

[0108] Based on the above data, the rating results of the preparation and implementation of special specifications for the equipment to be tested are determined, corresponding to the rating results of the preparation and implementation of special specifications for the secondary evaluation indicators.

[0109] In some embodiments, statistical analysis is used to check the effectiveness of the implementation of the standards in the production process and to count all the problems that occur in the production process. and the number of standardized questions , calculate the proportion of standardized problems , the specific calculation formula is shown in (10); check the level of the standardization coefficient of the equipment to be tested, and calculate the standardized number of pieces coefficient R of the equipment and its supporting products according to the parts, components and complete parts list of the equipment and its supporting products. The specific calculation formula is shown in (11), the standardized number coefficient , the specific calculation formula is shown in (12). The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 8.

[0110]

[0111]

[0112]

[0113] Among them, Q is the total number of zero, partial and whole pieces, The total number of varieties of parts, components and complete items. is the number of standard parts, is the number of common pieces, is the number of borrowed items, is the number of purchased parts, is the number of standard parts, is the number of common parts varieties, is the number of loan items, The number of purchased parts.

[0114] Table 8 Rating criteria for the effectiveness of standard implementation

[0115]

[0116] Based on the above data, the rating results of the implementation benefits of the equipment standards to be tested are determined, corresponding to the rating results of the implementation benefit evaluation of the secondary evaluation indicator standards.

[0117] In the above embodiment, by implementing and subdividing the first-level evaluation index standard and then performing rating, a more accurate rating result can be obtained.

[0118] In an exemplary embodiment, the relevant data include extended data of module combinations and interfaces of different versions of the equipment to be tested, usage data of devices and interfaces of the equipment to be tested, and field replaceable unit data of the equipment to be tested; accordingly, the relevant data are quantitatively rated according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain rating results of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including: based on the extended data, determining the rating results of the serialized design of module combinations and interfaces of different versions of the equipment to be tested; based on the usage data, determining the rating results of the universal use of devices and interfaces of the equipment to be tested; based on the field replaceable unit data, calculating the proportion of field replaceable units in the equipment to be tested, and determining the rating results of the combined design of the equipment to be tested according to the proportion.

[0119] Among them, the extended data of module combinations and interfaces of different versions of the equipment to be tested include the serialization of the equipment to be tested; the usage data of the devices and interfaces of the equipment to be tested include the standard parts of the equipment to be tested, the selection of general support equipment, the universal design of modules and the universal design of interfaces; the field replaceable unit data of the equipment to be tested include the combined design of the equipment to be tested.

[0120] In some embodiments, the serialization of the equipment to be tested is checked by means of document review, and the serialization extension and development of the predecessor equipment, the current equipment, and the subsequent equipment (different versions of the equipment to be tested) are evaluated by focusing on the equipment module composition, interface, etc. The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 9.

[0121] Table 9 Equipment serialization rating criteria

[0122]

[0123] Based on the above data, the rating results of the module combination and interface serialization design of different versions of the equipment to be tested are determined, corresponding to the rating results of the serialization of secondary evaluation indicators.

[0124] In some embodiments, statistical analysis methods are used to check the selection of standard parts and universal support equipment; check the universal design of modules and count the number of universal modules. , total number of parts, components and complete items , calculation module generalization rate , the specific calculation formula is shown in (13); check the universal design of the interface, and count the total number of interfaces of each subsystem according to different subsystems , Number of common interfaces , calculate the general interface rate , the specific calculation formula is shown in (14). Among them, standard parts refer to parts that are specified by special standards and have been completely standardized in terms of structure, size, etc., and general support equipment refers to equipment that is not only used for the maintenance and support of the equipment to be tested, but also for the maintenance and support of other equipment. The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 10.

[0125]

[0126]

[0127] Table 10 Equipment Commonality Rating Criteria

[0128]

[0129] Based on the above data, the universal usage rating results of the devices and interfaces of the equipment to be tested are determined, corresponding to the universal rating results of the secondary evaluation indicators.

[0130] In some embodiments, statistical analysis is performed to count the number of LRUs (line replaceable units) in the modular design. and the number of LRU varieties designed in combination , calculate the proportion of LRU number in combined design The specific calculation formula is shown in (15), which calculates the proportion of LRU types in the combined design. , the specific calculation formula is shown in (16). The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 11.

[0131]

[0132]

[0133] Among them, is the total number of equipment LRUs, is the total number of LRU types.

[0134] Table 11 Equipment combination assessment criteria

[0135]

[0136] Based on the above data, the rating results of the combined design of the equipment to be tested are determined, corresponding to the rating results of the combination of secondary evaluation indicators.

[0137] In the above embodiment, by subdividing the first-level evaluation index equipment "three transformations" and then performing rating, a more accurate rating result can be obtained.

[0138] In an exemplary embodiment, the relevant data include technical data data of the equipment to be tested and questionnaire results on the completeness, accuracy and validity of the technical data data; accordingly, the relevant data are quantitatively rated according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain rating results of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including: based on the technical data data, calculating the completeness rate of the technical data of the equipment to be tested, and determining the rating result of the completeness of the technical data of the equipment to be tested according to the size of the completeness rate of the technical data; based on the questionnaire results, determining the rating results of the completeness, accuracy and validity of the technical data of the equipment to be tested.

[0139] Among them, the technical data of the equipment to be tested includes the completeness of the technical data; the integrity, accuracy and validity of the technical data include completeness, accuracy and validity.

[0140] In some embodiments, the document review method is used to count the number of user technical data actually submitted according to the user technical data list in the status identification stage. , the total number of technical data of users should be submitted , calculate the completeness rate of technical data , the specific calculation formula is shown in (17). The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 12.

[0141]

[0142] Table 12 Technical data completeness rating criteria

[0143]

[0144] Based on the above data, the rating results of the completeness of the technical data of the equipment to be tested are determined, which corresponds to the rating results of the completeness of the secondary evaluation indicators.

[0145] In some embodiments, the completeness of the technical data is checked. According to GJB 5432-2005 "Requirements for Planning and Compilation of Technical Data for Equipment Users", the technical data items are checked through document review to see whether they are complete and the number of technical data that meet the requirements of relevant standards is counted. , the actual number of submissions , calculate the technical data compliance rate , the specific calculation formula is shown in (18); check the accuracy and effectiveness of technical data, organize users to conduct questionnaire interviews in the form of questionnaire surveys, conduct scoring evaluations and feedback on relevant issues, and investigate whether the technical data is accurate and standardized, whether it correctly and fully reflects the equipment use and maintenance requirements, and whether it can effectively guide users to operate and use. The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 13.

[0146]

[0147] Table 13 Rating criteria for completeness, accuracy and effectiveness of technical data

[0148]

[0149] Based on the above data, the rating results of the completeness, accuracy and effectiveness of the technical data of the equipment to be tested are determined, corresponding to the rating results of the completeness, accuracy and effectiveness of the secondary evaluation indicators.

[0150] In the above embodiment, by subdividing the applicability of the first-level evaluation indicator technical data and then performing rating, a more accurate rating result can be obtained.

[0151] In an exemplary embodiment, the relevant data includes technical status file data of the equipment to be tested, software data of the equipment to be tested and hardware data of the equipment to be tested; accordingly, the relevant data is quantitatively rated according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain rating results of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including: based on the technical status file data, calculating the consistency rate of the technical status files of the equipment to be tested, and determining the rating result of the consistency of the technical status files of the equipment to be tested according to the size of the consistency rate of the technical status files; based on the software data, calculating the consistency rate between the software of the equipment to be tested and the software in the preset software list, and determining the rating result of the software of the equipment to be tested according to the size of the consistency rate between the software of the equipment to be tested and the software in the preset software list; based on the hardware data, calculating the consistency rate between the hardware of the equipment to be tested and the hardware in the preset hardware list, and determining the rating result of the hardware of the equipment to be tested according to the size of the consistency rate between the hardware of the equipment to be tested and the hardware in the preset hardware list.

[0152] Among them, the technical status file data of the equipment to be tested includes whether the actual technical status file is complete with the technical status file specified in GJB 3206A-2010 "Technical Status Management"; the software data of the equipment to be tested includes the completeness of the supporting software configuration items and whether the supporting software version is the latest valid version; the hardware data of the equipment to be tested includes whether the hardware composition in the delivery document is consistent with the identified and finalized technical status and whether the software configuration items and version in the software user manual are consistent with the identified and finalized technical status.

[0153] In some embodiments, the document review method is adopted to count the number of technical status documents specified in the relevant standards according to GJB 3206A-2010 "Technical Status Management" , the actual number of technical status documents The number of actual technical status documents consistent with the technical status documents specified in the standard , calculate the uniformity rate , as shown in the specific calculation formula (19). Among them, the technical status document is the technical document on the verification, use, guarantee and scrapping requirements of the technical status items; the technical status items refer to the hardware, software or their collection that can meet the final use function and is designated as a single entity for technical status management. The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 14.

[0154]

[0155] Table 14 Technical status document consistency rating criteria

[0156]

[0157] Based on the above data, the rating results of the completeness of the technical status documents of the equipment to be tested are determined, corresponding to the rating results of the consistency of the technical document status of the secondary evaluation indicator.

[0158] In some embodiments, the completeness of the supporting software configuration items is checked by file review, and the total number of software configuration items is counted according to the equipment supporting software configuration items and version information list. , the number of actual software configuration items consistent with the list , calculate the consistency rate of software configuration items , the specific calculation formula is shown in (20); check whether the supporting software version is the latest valid version, and count the number of actual software technical status and the number of consistency in the list , calculate the technical status consistency rate , the specific calculation formula is shown in (21). The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 15.

[0159]

[0160]

[0161] Table 15 Equipment software technical status consistency rating criteria

[0162]

[0163] The rating result of the equipment software to be tested is determined based on the above data, which corresponds to the rating result of the second-level evaluation indicator software technical status consistency.

[0164] In some embodiments, a document review method is used to count the number of times the actual hardware components of the equipment are consistent with the hardware components list according to the equipment hardware components list. and the actual hardware components of the equipment , calculate the hardware composition consistency rate , the specific calculation formula is shown in (22). The specific rating criteria are shown in Table 16.

[0165]

[0166] Table 16 Equipment hardware technical status consistency rating criteria

[0167]

[0168] Based on the above data, the rating results of the equipment to be tested hardware are determined, corresponding to the rating results of the secondary evaluation indicator hardware technical status consistency.

[0169] In the above embodiment, by subdividing the first-level evaluation indicator technical status consistency and then performing rating, a more accurate rating result can be obtained.

[0170] In an exemplary embodiment, the equipment standardization evaluation method further includes: when there is at least one item in the rating result that does not meet the preset condition, improving the equipment to be tested.

[0171] In actual implementation, a rating result is obtained for each secondary evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested. When the rating result is "bad" or "good", the secondary evaluation indicator corresponding to the equipment to be tested is improved.

[0172] In the above embodiment, according to the rating results of each evaluation index, it is possible to clarify the deficiencies in the standardization work of the equipment development unit and the degree of equipment standardization that need to be improved, standardize the equipment development process, and ensure product quality.

[0173] To explain the equipment standardization evaluation method in this application in detail, an example is given below. The specific process is as follows: Figure 4 As shown, illustratively, the present application is described using an equipment standardization evaluation method in a specific scenario.

[0174] First, the terminal obtains the evaluation index data required for the equipment under test in the entire evaluation process during the scheme stage, engineering development stage and status identification stage through at least one of the preset methods.

[0175] The relevant data are quantitatively rated according to the preset evaluation indicators to obtain the rating results of each secondary evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested. Among them, the rating results are divided into three levels: "good", "relatively good" and "bad".

[0176] The terminal evaluates the equipment under test according to the rating results obtained. When the rating result is "bad" or "good", the secondary evaluation index corresponding to the equipment under test is improved.

[0177] This application breaks down the equipment evaluation indicators into multiple evaluation elements, and evaluates each secondary evaluation indicator by combining each evaluation factor with quantitative indicators and grading methods; for equipment in different fields, a unified set of evaluation criteria is used to improve the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation results.

[0178] It should be understood that, although the various steps in the flowcharts involved in the above-mentioned embodiments are displayed in sequence according to the indication of the arrows, these steps are not necessarily executed in sequence according to the order indicated by the arrows. Unless there is a clear explanation in this article, the execution of these steps does not have a strict order restriction, and these steps can be executed in other orders. Moreover, at least a part of the steps in the flowcharts involved in the above-mentioned embodiments can include multiple steps or multiple stages, and these steps or stages are not necessarily executed at the same time, but can be executed at different times, and the execution order of these steps or stages is not necessarily to be carried out in sequence, but can be executed in turn or alternately with other steps or at least a part of the steps or stages in other steps.

[0179] Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the present application also provides an equipment standardization assessment device for implementing the equipment standardization assessment method involved above. The implementation solution provided by the device to solve the problem is similar to the implementation solution recorded in the above method, so the specific limitations in one or more equipment standardization assessment device embodiments provided below can refer to the limitations of the equipment standardization assessment method above, and will not be repeated here.

[0180] In an exemplary embodiment, Figure 5 As shown, an equipment standardization evaluation device 500 is provided, comprising: an acquisition module 501, a rating module 502 and an evaluation module 503, wherein:

[0181] The acquisition module is used to obtain relevant data of each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status identification stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the equipment to be tested.

[0182] The rating module is used to perform quantitative rating on the relevant data according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain the rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested.

[0183] An evaluation module is used to evaluate the equipment to be tested based on the rating result.

[0184] In some embodiments, the above-mentioned rating module is also used to determine the rating results of the standardization work organization based on the establishment data; determine the rating results of the standardization document system construction based on the construction data; calculate the completion rate of the standardization review issues based on the processing data, and determine the rating results of the standardization review issues based on the completion rate and the review data of the standardization issues; the processing data includes the review data.

[0185] In some embodiments, the above-mentioned rating module is also used to determine the rating results of the construction of the standard system of the equipment to be tested based on the standard system construction data; determine the rating results of the selection and tailoring of the standards for the equipment to be tested based on the standard selection and tailoring data; calculate the implementation rate of the preparation of special specifications for the equipment to be tested based on the special specification preparation and implementation data, and determine the rating results of the preparation and implementation of special specifications for the equipment to be tested based on the implementation rate and the completeness data of the content of the special specifications of the equipment to be tested; the special specification preparation and implementation data include completeness data; based on the implementation benefit evaluation data of the standard implementation, determine the rating results of the implementation benefit of the implementation of the equipment to be tested.

[0186] In some embodiments, the above-mentioned rating module is also used to determine the rating results of the module combination and interface serialization design of different versions of the equipment to be tested based on the extended data; determine the universal usage rating results of the devices and interfaces of the equipment to be tested based on the usage data; calculate the proportion of field replaceable units in the equipment to be tested based on the field replaceable unit data, and determine the rating results of the combined design of the equipment to be tested according to the proportion.

[0187] In some embodiments, the above-mentioned rating module is also used to calculate the completeness rate of the technical data of the equipment to be tested based on the technical data data, and determine the rating results of the completeness of the technical data of the equipment to be tested according to the size of the completeness rate of the technical data; based on the questionnaire results, determine the rating results of the completeness, accuracy and effectiveness of the technical data of the equipment to be tested.

[0188] In some embodiments, the above-mentioned rating module is also used to calculate the consistency rate of the technical status files of the equipment to be tested based on the technical status file data, and determine the rating result of the consistency of the technical status files of the equipment to be tested according to the size of the consistency rate of the technical status files; calculate the consistency rate between the software of the equipment to be tested and the software in the preset software list based on the software data, and determine the rating result of the software of the equipment to be tested according to the size of the consistency rate between the software of the equipment to be tested and the software in the preset software list; calculate the consistency rate between the hardware of the equipment to be tested and the hardware in the preset hardware list based on the hardware data, and determine the rating result of the hardware of the equipment to be tested according to the size of the consistency rate between the hardware of the equipment to be tested and the hardware in the preset hardware list.

[0189] In some embodiments, the device further includes an improvement module, which is used to improve the equipment to be tested when at least one item in the rating results does not meet a preset condition.

[0190] Each module in the above-mentioned equipment standardization assessment device can be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, or a combination thereof. Each of the above-mentioned modules can be embedded in or independent of a processor in a computer device in the form of hardware, or can be stored in a memory in a computer device in the form of software, so that the processor can call and execute the operations corresponding to each of the above modules.

[0191] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer device is provided. The computer device may be a server, and its internal structure diagram may be as shown in FIG. Figure 6 As shown. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, an input / output interface (Input / Output, referred to as I / O) and a communication interface, a display unit and an input device. Among them, the processor, the memory and the input / output interface are connected through a system bus, and the communication interface, the display unit and the input device are connected to the system bus through the input / output interface. Among them, the processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The database of the computer device is used to store evaluation index data. The input / output interface of the computer device is used to exchange information between the processor and an external device. The communication interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal through a network connection. When the computer program is executed by the processor, a method for evaluating equipment standardization is implemented.

[0192] The display unit of the computer device is used to form a visually visible picture, and can be a display screen, a projection device, or a virtual reality imaging device. The display screen can be a liquid crystal display screen or an electronic ink display screen, and the input device of the computer device can be a touch layer covered on the display screen, or a key, trackball, or touchpad provided on the computer device housing, or an external keyboard, touchpad, or mouse, etc.

[0193] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 6 The structure shown in the figure is only a block diagram of a part of the structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of the present application is applied. The specific computer device may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.

[0194] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are implemented:

[0195] Obtain relevant data for each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status assessment stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the equipment to be tested;

[0196] Quantitatively rating the relevant data according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested;

[0197] Based on the rating result, the equipment to be tested is evaluated.

[0198] In one embodiment, a computer readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0199] Obtain relevant data for each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status assessment stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the equipment to be tested;

[0200] Quantitatively rating the relevant data according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested;

[0201] Based on the rating result, the equipment to be tested is evaluated.

[0202] In one embodiment, a computer program product is provided, comprising a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the following steps:

[0203] Obtain relevant data for each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status assessment stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the equipment to be tested;

[0204] Quantitatively rating the relevant data according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested;

[0205] Based on the rating result, the equipment to be tested is evaluated.

[0206] It should be noted that the user information (including but not limited to user device information, user personal information, etc.) and data (including but not limited to data used for analysis, stored data, displayed data, etc.) involved in this application are all information and data authorized by the user or fully authorized by all parties, and the collection, use and processing of relevant data must comply with relevant regulations.

[0207] A person of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment method can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to the memory, database or other medium used in the embodiments provided in the present application can include at least one of non-volatile memory and volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash memory, optical memory, high-density embedded non-volatile memory, resistive random access memory (ReRAM), magnetic random access memory (MRAM), ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM), phase change memory (PCM), graphene memory, etc. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory, etc. As an illustration and not limitation, RAM can be in various forms, such as static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM). The database involved in each embodiment provided in this application may include at least one of a relational database and a non-relational database. Non-relational databases may include distributed databases based on blockchains, etc., but are not limited to this. The processor involved in each embodiment provided in this application may be a general-purpose processor, a central processing unit, a graphics processor, a digital signal processor, a programmable logic device, a data processing logic device based on quantum computing, an artificial intelligence (AI) processor, etc., but are not limited to this.

[0208] The technical features of the above embodiments may be combined arbitrarily. To make the description concise, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this application.

[0209] The above-described embodiments only express several implementation methods of the present application, and the descriptions thereof are relatively specific and detailed, but they cannot be understood as limiting the scope of the present application. It should be pointed out that, for a person of ordinary skill in the art, several variations and improvements can be made without departing from the concept of the present application, and these all belong to the protection scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application shall be subject to the attached claims.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating equipment standardization, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtain relevant data for each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status assessment stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the equipment to be tested; Quantitatively rating the relevant data according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested; Based on the rating result, the equipment to be tested is evaluated.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The relevant data includes data on the establishment of the standardization work organization of the equipment to be tested, data on the construction of the standardization document system, and data on the processing of standardization review issues; accordingly, the relevant data is quantitatively rated according to the preset evaluation indicators to obtain the rating results of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including: Based on the establishment data, determining a rating result of the standardization work organization; Based on the construction data, determining a rating result of the construction of the standardized document system; Based on the processed data, the completion rate of the standardized review questions is calculated, and according to the size of the completion rate and the review data of the standardized review questions, the rating results of the standardized review questions are determined; the processed data includes the review data.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The relevant data include the standard system construction data of the equipment to be tested, the standard selection and tailoring data of the equipment to be tested, the special specification compilation and implementation data of the equipment to be tested, and the implementation benefit evaluation data of the standard implementation of the equipment to be tested; accordingly, the relevant data are quantitatively rated according to the preset evaluation indicators to obtain the rating results of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including: Determining a rating result of the construction of the standard system of the equipment to be tested based on the standard system construction data; Determining a rating result of the standard selection and tailoring of the equipment to be tested based on the standard selection and tailoring data; Based on the special specification preparation and implementation data, calculating the implementation rate of the special specification preparation of the equipment to be tested, and determining the rating result of the special specification preparation and implementation of the equipment to be tested according to the implementation rate and the completeness data of the content of the special specification of the equipment to be tested; the special specification preparation and implementation data includes the completeness data; Based on the implementation benefit evaluation data, a rating result of the implementation benefit of the equipment standard to be tested is determined.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The relevant data includes extended data of module combinations and interfaces of different versions of the equipment to be tested, usage data of devices and interfaces of the equipment to be tested, and field replaceable unit data of the equipment to be tested; accordingly, the relevant data are quantitatively rated according to preset evaluation indicators to obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including: Based on the extended data, determining rating results of module combinations and interface serialization designs of different versions of the equipment to be tested; Based on the usage data, determining a universal usage rating result of the device and interface of the equipment to be tested; Based on the line replaceable unit data, the proportion of the line replaceable units in the equipment to be tested is calculated, and according to the size of the proportion, the rating result of the combined design of the equipment to be tested is determined.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The relevant data includes the technical data of the equipment to be tested and the questionnaire results on the completeness, accuracy and effectiveness of the technical data; accordingly, the relevant data are quantitatively rated according to the preset evaluation indicators to obtain the rating results of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including: Based on the technical data data, calculating the completeness rate of the technical data of the equipment to be tested, and determining the rating result of the completeness of the technical data of the equipment to be tested according to the size of the completeness rate of the technical data; Based on the questionnaire results, the rating results of the completeness, accuracy and effectiveness of the technical data of the equipment to be tested are determined.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The relevant data includes technical status file data of the equipment to be tested, software data of the equipment to be tested, and hardware data of the equipment to be tested; accordingly, the relevant data are quantitatively rated according to the preset evaluation indicators to obtain the rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested, including: Based on the technical status file data, the consistency rate of the technical status file of the equipment to be tested is calculated, and according to the size of the consistency rate of the technical status file, a rating result of the consistency of the technical status file of the equipment to be tested is determined; Based on the software data, the consistency rate between the software of the equipment to be tested and the software in the preset software list is calculated, and the rating result of the software of the equipment to be tested is determined according to the consistency rate between the software of the equipment to be tested and the software in the preset software list; Based on the hardware data, the consistency rate between the hardware of the equipment to be tested and the hardware in the preset hardware list is calculated, and the rating result of the hardware of the equipment to be tested is determined according to the consistency rate between the hardware of the equipment to be tested and the hardware in the preset hardware list.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The method further comprises: When at least one item in the rating results does not meet the preset condition, the equipment to be tested is improved.

8. An equipment standardization evaluation device, characterized in that: The device comprises: An acquisition module is used to acquire relevant data of each stage of the equipment to be tested; the stages include the scheme stage, the engineering development stage and the status evaluation stage; the relevant data refers to the evaluation index data required to be used in the process of evaluating the equipment to be tested; A rating module, used to perform quantitative rating on the relevant data according to preset evaluation indicators, and obtain a rating result of each evaluation indicator of the equipment to be tested; An evaluation module is used to evaluate the equipment to be tested based on the rating result.

9. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, wherein: When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

Images