Zero-carbon park comprehensive index evaluation method and system based on actual contribution

Abstract

The invention discloses a zero-carbon park comprehensive index evaluation method and system based on actual contribution, and the method comprises the steps: determining all technical routes adopted by a zero-carbon park based on the function type of the zero-carbon park, and obtaining the carbon emission data and carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technical route in a period; based on the carbon emission data corresponding to each technical route in the period, evaluation is carried out by using the evaluation index corresponding to each technical route, and an evaluation score corresponding to each technical route in the period is obtained; calculating based on the carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technical route in the cycle and the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all the technical routes in the cycle to obtain a carbon emission contribution degree coefficient corresponding to each technical route in the cycle; calculating based on the evaluation score in combination with the carbon emission contribution degree coefficient to obtain an evaluation score of the zero-carbon park; according to the method, the actual carbon emission reduction amount of each low-carbon technical route is considered, and the objective degree of park carbon emission evaluation is improved; and the evaluation period is taken as a variable to be calculated, so that dynamic evaluation of the park is realized.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention application relates to the field of zero-carbon emission park development evaluation, specifically to a method and system for evaluating comprehensive indicators of zero-carbon parks based on actual contributions. Background Technology

[0002] Near-zero carbon industrial parks are industrial spaces that achieve rapid reduction and approach to zero carbon emissions within a region by integrating and applying technologies and management mechanisms across multiple fields such as energy, industry, construction, transportation, waste treatment, and ecology, while ensuring high-quality economic development and ecological civilization construction.

[0003] Zero-carbon industrial parks: These parks systematically integrate the concept of carbon neutrality into all aspects of park planning, construction, management, and operation. Relying on a zero-carbon operating system, they use precise accounting to plan carbon neutrality targets and implementation paths, ubiquitous sensing to comprehensively monitor the generation and reduction of carbon elements, digital means to integrate carbon neutrality measures such as energy conservation, emission reduction, carbon sequestration, and carbon sinks, and intelligent management to achieve low-carbon industrial development, green energy transformation, clustered and shared facilities, and circular utilization of resources. This enables the parks to achieve self-balance between carbon emissions and absorption, and promotes a new type of industrial park that integrates production, ecology, and living.

[0004] The basic framework of a low-carbon / zero-carbon industrial park consists of five major systems: a low-carbon energy system, a low-carbon building system, a low-carbon transportation system, a three-dimensional ecological carbon sink system, and a smart carbon management system.

[0005] Low-carbon energy systems focus on integrated energy to create a low-carbon energy consumption structure. This is achieved through technologies such as distributed photovoltaic power generation, user-side energy storage, cold and heat storage, flexible resource interaction, energy cascade utilization, waste energy utilization, smart microgrids in industrial parks, green electricity trading, and clean and efficient utilization of coal.

[0006] Low-carbon building systems drive the green and low-carbon transformation of buildings through a "dual-engine" approach, focusing on both the greening of the building structure and its operation. This is achieved through technologies such as recyclable building materials, green and low-carbon building materials, prefabricated buildings, green buildings, advanced ventilation technology, high-efficiency insulation technology, clean heating, all-electric kitchens, high-efficiency cooling and heating equipment, and energy-saving lighting fixtures.

[0007] The low-carbon transportation system, centered on new energy vehicles and shared transportation, promotes cleaner transportation within the park. This is achieved through technologies such as electric / hydrogen fuel cell vehicles and their supporting infrastructure, public transportation within the park, and shared mobility.

[0008] The three-dimensional ecological carbon sequestration system takes multi-mode and multi-scenario park greening as its starting point to create a diverse and three-dimensional green ecology. It is achieved through technologies such as tree-surround greening, vertical greening, roof greening, protective greening, micro green spaces, park water systems, shaded parking lots, and green corridors.

[0009] The intelligent carbon management system promotes the intelligent upgrading of carbon management and operation in industrial parks by implementing full-process digitalization. This is achieved through technologies such as intelligent monitoring and analysis systems, park (energy / building / transportation) operation optimization and intelligent control systems, electricity trading systems, carbon emission statistical analysis systems, carbon footprint management systems, and carbon asset management systems.

[0010] For different types of parks in different scenarios and at different stages of development, the existing carbon emission statistics and evaluation technologies are insufficient to comprehensively, accurately and in real time assess the degree of low carbonization of the parks, and are not perfect in terms of integration, universality and dynamic adaptability.

[0011] Existing zero-carbon park evaluation technologies often overlook the different roles of various low-carbon technologies in carbon emission reduction under different scenarios and stages, and fail to adequately consider their contribution to reducing actual carbon emissions. As a result, evaluation indicators cannot truly and objectively reflect the degree of low-carbonization of the park, and the evaluation results often deviate significantly from the actual situation. Summary of the Invention

[0012] To address the problem that existing zero-carbon park evaluation technologies neglect the varying roles of different low-carbon technologies in carbon reduction across different scenarios and stages, and fail to adequately consider their contribution to actual carbon emission reduction, resulting in evaluation indicators that cannot accurately and objectively reflect the degree of carbon reduction in the park, this invention proposes a comprehensive indicator evaluation method for zero-carbon parks based on actual contributions, including:

[0013] Based on the functional type of the zero-carbon park, determine all the technical routes adopted by the zero-carbon park, and obtain the carbon emission data and carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technical route within the cycle.

[0014] Based on the carbon emission data corresponding to each technology route within the cycle, the evaluation is carried out using the pre-determined evaluation indicators corresponding to each technology route to obtain the evaluation score corresponding to each technology route within the cycle.

[0015] The carbon emission reduction coefficient corresponding to each technology route within the cycle is calculated by combining the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle.

[0016] The evaluation score of the zero-carbon park is calculated by combining the evaluation score of each technical route within the cycle with the carbon emission contribution coefficient of each technical route within the cycle.

[0017] The evaluation indicators for each technical route are determined based on typical scenarios and evaluation boundaries of zero-carbon parks that cover multiple functional types and include building, energy, and transportation aspects.

[0018] Preferably, the calculation of the carbon emission contribution coefficient for each technology route within the cycle, based on the carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technology route within the cycle and combined with the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle, includes:

[0019] The carbon emission reductions corresponding to each technology route within the cycle are summed to obtain the carbon emission reductions corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle.

[0020] The carbon emission reduction coefficients for each technology route within a cycle are obtained by comparing them with the carbon emission reductions for all technology routes within the cycle.

[0021] Preferably, the formula for calculating the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to each technical route is as follows:

[0022] α i =ΔS i / ∑ΔS i

[0023] In the formula, α i ΔS is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i Let ∑ΔS be the carbon emission reduction corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route during the evaluation period; i represents the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technical routes; i is the sorting number of the low-carbon technical route.

[0024] Preferably, the evaluation score of the zero-carbon park is calculated using the following formula:

[0025] B(N)=∑α i A i

[0026] In the formula, B(N) is the evaluation score of the zero-carbon industrial park within period N; N is the evaluation period; α i A is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i Let be the evaluation score for the i-th low-carbon technology route; i is the ranking number of the low-carbon technology route.

[0027] Preferably, the technical approach includes one or more of the following: low-carbon energy, low-carbon buildings, low-carbon transportation, ecological carbon sinks, and smart carbon emission management.

[0028] Preferably, the evaluation indicators corresponding to each technical route include one or more of the following: proportion of non-fossil energy consumption, proportion of distributed new energy, proportion of green electricity trading, energy utilization efficiency, level of co-construction and sharing of energy infrastructure, level of energy cascade utilization, electrification rate, energy consumption per unit output value, carbon emissions per unit energy consumption, total amount of flexible resources, utilization rate of flexible resources, usage rate of environmentally friendly building materials, proportion of green buildings, energy consumption per unit building area, carbon emissions per unit building area, level of clean heating and cooling, proportion of new energy transportation vehicles, level of construction of public / shared transportation, degree of perfection of supporting facilities for new energy vehicles, green space ratio, per capita green space area, carbon sink per unit area, level of construction of carbon emission information platform, degree of perfection of carbon monitoring facilities, accuracy rate of carbon emission accounting, level of intelligent management of park production, level of construction and operation of carbon emission management system, and participation of enterprises in the park.

[0029] Preferably, the carbon emission data corresponding to each technical route includes one or more of the following: total energy consumption, fossil energy consumption, distributed new energy power generation, purchased green electricity generation, total number of buildings in the park, number of green buildings, building area, total building energy consumption, building carbon emissions, new energy vehicle usage, number of charging piles / stations, total number of vehicles, planned land area of ​​the park, green area, and carbon reduction from ecological carbon sinks.

[0030] Based on the same inventive concept, this invention also proposes a comprehensive index evaluation system for zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions, including:

[0031] The data acquisition module is used to determine all the technical routes adopted by the zero-carbon park based on the functional type of the zero-carbon park, and to acquire the carbon emission data and carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technical route within the period.

[0032] The technology route evaluation module is used to evaluate each technology route based on the carbon emission data corresponding to each technology route within the cycle, using pre-determined evaluation indicators for each technology route, and to obtain the evaluation score for each technology route within the cycle.

[0033] The contribution coefficient module is used to calculate the carbon emission contribution coefficient of each technology route within the cycle based on the carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technology route within the cycle and the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle.

[0034] The zero-carbon park evaluation module is used to calculate the evaluation score of the zero-carbon park based on the evaluation score corresponding to each technical route within the cycle and the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to each technical route within the cycle.

[0035] The evaluation indicators for each technical route are determined based on typical scenarios and evaluation boundaries of zero-carbon parks that cover multiple functional types and include building, energy, and transportation aspects.

[0036] Preferably, the contribution coefficient module is specifically used for:

[0037] The carbon emission reductions corresponding to each technology route within the cycle are summed to obtain the carbon emission reductions corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle.

[0038] The carbon emission reduction coefficients for each technology route within a cycle are obtained by comparing them with the carbon emission reductions for all technology routes within the cycle.

[0039] Preferably, the calculation formula for the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to each technical route in the contribution coefficient module is as follows:

[0040] α i =ΔS i / ∑ΔS i

[0041] In the formula, α i ΔS is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i Let ∑ΔS be the carbon emission reduction corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route during the evaluation period; i represents the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technical routes; i is the sorting number of the low-carbon technical route.

[0042] Preferably, the evaluation score of the zero-carbon park is calculated using the following formula:

[0043] B(N)=∑α i A i

[0044] In the formula, B(N) is the evaluation score of the zero-carbon industrial park within period N; N is the evaluation period; α i A is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i Let be the evaluation score for the i-th low-carbon technology route; i is the ranking number of the low-carbon technology route.

[0045] Preferably, the technical approach includes one or more of the following: low-carbon energy, low-carbon buildings, low-carbon transportation, ecological carbon sinks, and smart carbon emission management.

[0046] Preferably, the evaluation indicators corresponding to each technical route include one or more of the following: proportion of non-fossil energy consumption, proportion of distributed new energy, proportion of green electricity trading, energy utilization efficiency, level of co-construction and sharing of energy infrastructure, level of energy cascade utilization, electrification rate, energy consumption per unit output value, carbon emissions per unit energy consumption, total amount of flexible resources, utilization rate of flexible resources, usage rate of environmentally friendly building materials, proportion of green buildings, energy consumption per unit building area, carbon emissions per unit building area, level of clean heating and cooling, proportion of new energy transportation vehicles, level of construction of public / shared transportation, degree of perfection of supporting facilities for new energy vehicles, green space ratio, per capita green space area, carbon sink per unit area, level of construction of carbon emission information platform, degree of perfection of carbon monitoring facilities, accuracy rate of carbon emission accounting, level of intelligent management of park production, level of construction and operation of carbon emission management system, and participation of enterprises in the park.

[0047] Preferably, the carbon emission data corresponding to each technical route includes one or more of the following: total energy consumption, fossil energy consumption, distributed new energy power generation, purchased green electricity generation, total number of buildings in the park, number of green buildings, building area, total building energy consumption, building carbon emissions, new energy vehicle usage, number of charging piles / stations, total number of vehicles, planned land area of ​​the park, green area, and carbon reduction from ecological carbon sinks.

[0048] Furthermore, this application also provides a computing device, comprising: at least one processor and a memory;

[0049] The memory is used to store one or more programs;

[0050] When the one or more programs are executed by the at least one processor, a comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions, as described above, is implemented.

[0051] Furthermore, this application also provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed, implements the above-described method for evaluating the comprehensive indicators of zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions.

[0052] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of this invention application are as follows:

[0053] A method and system for evaluating the comprehensive indicators of zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions includes: determining all technical routes adopted by the zero-carbon industrial park based on its functional type, and acquiring carbon emission data and carbon emission reductions corresponding to each technical route within a period; evaluating each technical route using pre-determined evaluation indicators based on its carbon emission data within a period to obtain an evaluation score for each technical route within a period; calculating the carbon emission contribution coefficient of each technical route within a period based on the carbon emission reductions of each technical route combined with the carbon emission reductions of all technical routes within a period; and calculating the evaluation score of the zero-carbon industrial park based on the evaluation scores of each technical route within a period combined with the carbon emission contribution coefficients of each technical route within a period. The evaluation indicators for each technical route are determined based on typical scenarios and evaluation boundaries of zero-carbon industrial parks covering multiple functional types and encompassing building, energy, and transportation aspects. This invention considers the actual carbon emission reductions of each low-carbon technical route, improving the objectivity of the industrial park's carbon emission evaluation. This invention also incorporates the evaluation period as a variable in the calculation, achieving dynamic evaluation of the industrial park. Attached Figure Description

[0054] Figure 1 This invention application includes a flowchart of a comprehensive index evaluation method for zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions.

[0055] Figure 2 This is a diagram illustrating the technical solution architecture of the present invention.

[0056] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the recommended evaluation index set for zero-carbon industrial parks proposed in this invention.

[0057] Figure 4 This is a structural diagram of a comprehensive index evaluation system for zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions, as proposed in this invention application. Detailed Implementation

[0058] This invention addresses the challenges of unclear evaluation boundaries and ambiguous system composition in zero-carbon parks, which are designed for various functional types and encompass multiple functional areas including buildings, energy, and transportation. It constructs key evaluation indicators for zero-carbon parks from the perspectives of energy structure, low-carbon technologies, and social development, resolving issues such as single and one-sided evaluation indicators. Furthermore, it analyzes the actual emission reduction contribution rate of key indicators, establishes a multi-dimensional comprehensive indicator system for zero-carbon parks, and clarifies indicator limits, thus addressing the problem of evaluation indicators poorly reflecting actual carbon reduction. To better understand this invention, the following description, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments, further illustrates the content of this invention.

[0059] Example 1:

[0060] A comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions, the specific process of which is as follows: Figure 1 As shown, it includes:

[0061] Step 1: Based on the functional type of the zero-carbon park, determine all the technical routes adopted by the zero-carbon park, and obtain the carbon emission data and carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technical route within the cycle.

[0062] Step 2: Based on the carbon emission data corresponding to each technology route within the cycle, evaluate the data using the pre-determined evaluation indicators for each technology route to obtain the evaluation score for each technology route within the cycle.

[0063] Step 3: Calculate the carbon emission contribution coefficient of each technology route within the cycle based on the carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technology route within the cycle and the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle.

[0064] Step 4: Calculate the evaluation score of the zero-carbon park based on the evaluation score of each technical route within the cycle and the carbon emission contribution coefficient of each technical route within the cycle.

[0065] The evaluation indicators for each technical route are determined based on typical scenarios and evaluation boundaries of zero-carbon parks that cover multiple functional types and include building, energy, and transportation aspects.

[0066] The technical solution architecture of this embodiment is described below. Figure 2 As shown, a detailed introduction will be provided:

[0067] Before step 1, the process also includes determining the evaluation indicators for each technical route, specifically including:

[0068] First, for typical scenarios of zero-carbon parks with different functional types, this paper proposes typical scenarios and evaluation boundaries for zero-carbon parks covering multiple functional types and aspects such as buildings, energy, and transportation. Second, based on the definition and quantification methods of key evaluation indicators for zero-carbon parks, a complete set of operable and quantifiable evaluation indicators for zero-carbon parks is proposed. Third, based on the contribution rate analysis, a comprehensive indicator system construction method for zero-carbon parks is proposed, establishing a comprehensive indicator system for zero-carbon parks with multi-scenario adaptability from aspects such as zero-carbon energy, zero-carbon buildings, and zero-carbon transportation. Figure 3 As shown.

[0069] Step 1 involves determining all technological routes adopted by the zero-carbon park based on its functional type, and obtaining the carbon emission data and carbon emission reduction amounts corresponding to each technological route within the cycle. Specifically, this includes:

[0070] The park type is determined based on the park's planning data. The park types mainly include business offices, warehousing and logistics, special functions, and industry-city integration.

[0071] Determine the evaluation period, denoted as N.

[0072] The technological approach adopted by the park was determined, and data was acquired. The acquired data mainly includes the following aspects: Energy data, including total energy consumption, fossil fuel consumption, distributed renewable energy generation, and purchased green electricity; Building data, including the total number of buildings in the park, the number of green buildings, building area, total building energy consumption, and building carbon emissions; Transportation data, including the usage of new energy vehicles, the number of charging piles / stations, and the total number of vehicles; and Carbon sink data, including the planned land area of ​​the park, green space area, and the amount of carbon reduction from ecological carbon sinks.

[0073] Considering the actual contribution, the carbon emission reduction corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route within the evaluation period is calculated as follows:

[0074] ΔS i =Sp i -Sq i

[0075] In the formula, ΔS i Sp represents the carbon emission reduction corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route during the evaluation period; i Sq represents the carbon emissions corresponding to the i-th alternative technology route; i The carbon emissions corresponding to using non-low-carbon technologies to achieve the same effect (such as the same heating or cooling capacity); i is the sequence number of the low-carbon technology route.

[0076] The carbon emissions from buildings are calculated only considering emissions during the operational phase. Each technology's carbon emission reduction has a specific algorithm, which is not detailed in this embodiment.

[0077] In step 2, the carbon emission data corresponding to each technology route within the cycle are used to evaluate the technologies using pre-determined evaluation indicators, resulting in an evaluation score for each technology route within the cycle. This specifically includes:

[0078] This calculation assesses the evaluation scores of n low-carbon technologies, including energy, buildings, transportation, and ecological carbon sequestration. For energy technologies, innovative evaluation indicators include the proportion of green electricity trading (the percentage of electricity purchased through green electricity trading in the park throughout the year) and the total amount of flexible resources (the total installed capacity of various flexible resources such as electrochemical energy storage (including shared energy storage capacity leasing), cold and heat storage, and adjustable loads on the park's user side). For buildings, innovative indicators include the completeness of supporting facilities for new energy vehicles (evaluated using the vehicle-to-pile ratio). Each technology is scored as A. iThe maximum score is A. Because each technical approach is highly specialized and uses different evaluation theories and methods, different professional evaluation methods may be employed, which will not be elaborated further.

[0079] Without considering actual contributions, the evaluation score for this park is calculated as follows:

[0080] ∑A i / n

[0081] In the formula, A i Let A be the evaluation score for the i-th low-carbon technology route; n is the total number of technology routes; ∑A i / n represents the park's evaluation score; i represents the sorting number of the low-carbon technology route.

[0082] Step 3 involves calculating the carbon emission reduction coefficient for each technology route within the cycle, based on the carbon emission reduction of each technology route within the cycle combined with the carbon emission reduction of all technology routes within the cycle. This calculation includes:

[0083] The total carbon emission reduction achieved by the park through n low-carbon technologies within one cycle is calculated as follows:

[0084] ∑ΔS i

[0085] In the formula, ΔS i Let be the carbon emission reduction corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route within the evaluation period; i is the ranking number of the low-carbon technology route; ∑ΔS i This represents the carbon emission reductions corresponding to all technological approaches.

[0086] Calculate the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th technology route:

[0087] α i =ΔS i / ∑ΔS i

[0088] In the formula, α i ΔS is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i Let ∑ΔS be the carbon emission reduction corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route during the evaluation period; i represents the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technical routes; i is the sorting number of the low-carbon technical route.

[0089] In step 4, the evaluation score of the zero-carbon park is calculated based on the evaluation score corresponding to each technical route within the cycle and the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to each technical route within the cycle. Specifically, this includes:

[0090] Finally, for zero-carbon industrial parks with multi-stage carbon control goals, adaptive evaluation of the park's carbon control effectiveness at different stages such as low-carbon, near-zero-carbon, and zero-carbon can be achieved.

[0091] The evaluation score for the park, taking into account its actual contribution, is calculated as follows:

[0092] B(N)=∑α i A i

[0093] In the formula, B(N) is the evaluation score of the zero-carbon industrial park within period N; N is the evaluation period; α i A is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i Let B be the evaluation score for the i-th low-carbon technology route, where i is the ranking number of the low-carbon technology route. The evaluation score B is a function of the period N, which can dynamically reflect the low-carbon change trend under different periods and stages.

[0094] This embodiment proposes a comprehensive dynamic evaluation technology that can cover various types of industrial parks and can adaptively adjust according to different development stages of the parks. It can more objectively evaluate the degree of low-carbonization of the parks and effectively fill the gap in dynamic comprehensive evaluation technology for zero-carbon parks. Evaluation indicators based on actual contribution rates can quantitatively describe the actual carbon emission reduction contributions of different low-carbon technologies. By comprehensively considering the characteristics and effectiveness of various technologies, it can effectively avoid the aforementioned problems.

[0095] This embodiment addresses the challenges of zero-carbon parks with different functional types, constructing typical scenarios that cover various functional types including buildings, energy, and transportation. It resolves the issues of ambiguous evaluation boundaries and unclear system composition in zero-carbon parks.

[0096] This embodiment designs key evaluation indicators for zero-carbon industrial parks from the perspectives of energy structure, low-carbon technology, and social development, thus addressing issues such as the single and one-sided nature of evaluation indicators.

[0097] This embodiment analyzes the actual emission reduction contribution rate of key indicators, establishes a multi-dimensional comprehensive indicator system for zero-carbon industrial parks, clarifies indicator limits, and solves the problem that evaluation indicators do not reflect the actual carbon reduction situation well.

[0098] Example 2:

[0099] A comprehensive evaluation system for zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions, with the following structure: Figure 4 As shown, it includes:

[0100] The data acquisition module is used to determine all the technical routes adopted by the zero-carbon park based on the functional type of the zero-carbon park, and to acquire the carbon emission data and carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technical route within the period.

[0101] The technology route evaluation module is used to evaluate each technology route based on the carbon emission data corresponding to each technology route within the cycle, using pre-determined evaluation indicators for each technology route, and to obtain the evaluation score for each technology route within the cycle.

[0102] The contribution coefficient module is used to calculate the carbon emission contribution coefficient of each technology route within the cycle based on the carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technology route within the cycle and the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle.

[0103] The zero-carbon park evaluation module is used to calculate the evaluation score of the zero-carbon park based on the evaluation score corresponding to each technical route within the cycle and the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to each technical route within the cycle.

[0104] The evaluation indicators for each technical route are determined based on typical scenarios and evaluation boundaries of zero-carbon parks that cover multiple functional types and include building, energy, and transportation aspects.

[0105] The contribution coefficient module is specifically used for:

[0106] The carbon emission reductions corresponding to each technology route within the cycle are summed to obtain the carbon emission reductions corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle.

[0107] The carbon emission reduction coefficients for each technology route within a cycle are obtained by comparing them with the carbon emission reductions for all technology routes within the cycle.

[0108] The formulas for calculating the carbon emission contribution coefficients for each technology route in the contribution coefficient module are shown below:

[0109] α i =ΔS i / ∑ΔS i

[0110] In the formula, α i ΔS is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i Let ∑ΔS be the carbon emission reduction corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route during the evaluation period; i represents the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technical routes; i is the sorting number of the low-carbon technical route.

[0111] The formula for calculating the evaluation score of a zero-carbon park is as follows:

[0112] B(N)=∑α i A i

[0113] In the formula, B(N) is the evaluation score of the zero-carbon industrial park within period N; N is the evaluation period; α iA is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i Let be the evaluation score for the i-th low-carbon technology route; i is the ranking number of the low-carbon technology route.

[0114] The technological approaches include one or more of the following: low-carbon energy, low-carbon buildings, low-carbon transportation, ecological carbon sinks, and smart carbon emission management.

[0115] The evaluation indicators for each technical route include one or more of the following: proportion of non-fossil energy consumption, proportion of distributed new energy, proportion of green electricity trading, energy utilization efficiency, level of co-construction and sharing of energy infrastructure, level of energy cascade utilization, electrification rate, energy consumption per unit of output value, carbon emissions per unit of energy consumption, total amount of flexible resources, utilization rate of flexible resources, usage rate of environmentally friendly building materials, proportion of green buildings, energy consumption per unit of building area, carbon emissions per unit of building area, level of clean heating and cooling, proportion of new energy transportation vehicles, level of construction of public / shared transportation, degree of perfection of supporting facilities for new energy vehicles, green space ratio, per capita green space area, carbon sink per unit area, level of construction of carbon emission information platform, degree of perfection of carbon monitoring facilities, accuracy rate of carbon emission accounting, level of intelligent management of park production, level of construction and operation of carbon emission management system, and participation of enterprises in the park.

[0116] Carbon emission data corresponding to each technical route includes one or more of the following: total energy consumption, fossil energy consumption, distributed new energy power generation, purchased green electricity generation, total number of buildings in the park, number of green buildings, building area, total building energy consumption, building carbon emissions, use of new energy vehicles, number of charging piles / stations, total number of vehicles, planned land area of ​​the park, green area, and carbon reduction from ecological carbon sinks.

[0117] Example 3:

[0118] Based on the same inventive concept, in another embodiment of this application, a computer device is provided. This computer device includes a processor and a memory. The memory stores a computer program, which includes program instructions. The processor executes the program instructions stored in the computer storage medium. The processor may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), or other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSPs), application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. It is the computing and control core of the terminal, suitable for implementing one or more instructions, specifically suitable for loading and executing one or more instructions from the computer storage medium to implement corresponding method flows or corresponding functions, thereby realizing the steps of the comprehensive index evaluation method for zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions in the above embodiment.

[0119] Example 4:

[0120] Based on the same inventive concept, in another embodiment of this application, a storage medium is provided, specifically a computer-readable storage medium (Memory). This computer-readable storage medium is a memory device in a computer device used to store programs and data. It is understood that the computer-readable storage medium here can include both the built-in storage medium in the computer device and extended storage media supported by the computer device. The computer-readable storage medium provides storage space that stores the terminal's operating system. Furthermore, this storage space also stores one or more instructions suitable for loading and execution by a processor. These instructions can be one or more computer programs (including program code). It should be noted that the computer-readable storage medium here can be high-speed RAM or non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk storage device. The processor can load and execute one or more instructions stored in the computer-readable storage medium to implement the steps of the comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions in the above embodiment.

[0121] Those skilled in the art will understand that embodiments of this invention can be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Therefore, this invention can take the form of a completely hardware embodiment, a completely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, this invention can take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) containing computer-usable program code.

[0122] This invention application is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, special-purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, generate instructions for implementing the flowchart. Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in a block or multiple blocks.

[0123] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing device to work in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer readable memory produce an article of manufacture comprising an instruction device, which implements the process Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The function specified in one or more boxes.

[0124] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that a series of operating steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process, thereby providing the instructions executed on the computer or other programmable device for implementing the process. Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The steps of the function specified in one or more boxes.

[0125] The above are merely embodiments of this invention and are not intended to limit this invention. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principles of this invention are included within the scope of the claims of this invention application pending approval.

Claims

1. A comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions, characterized in that, include: Based on the functional type of the zero-carbon park, determine all the technical routes adopted by the zero-carbon park, and obtain the carbon emission data and carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technical route within the cycle. Based on the carbon emission data corresponding to each technology route within the cycle, the evaluation is carried out using the pre-determined evaluation indicators corresponding to each technology route to obtain the evaluation score corresponding to each technology route within the cycle. The carbon emission reduction coefficient corresponding to each technology route within the cycle is calculated by combining the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle. The evaluation score of the zero-carbon park is calculated by combining the evaluation score of each technical route within the cycle with the carbon emission contribution coefficient of each technical route within the cycle. The evaluation indicators for each technical route are determined based on typical scenarios and evaluation boundaries of zero-carbon parks that cover multiple functional types and include building, energy, and transportation aspects.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The carbon emission reduction coefficient corresponding to each technology route within the cycle is calculated by combining the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle, and includes: The carbon emission reductions corresponding to each technology route within the cycle are summed to obtain the carbon emission reductions corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle. The carbon emission reduction coefficient corresponding to each technology route within the cycle is obtained by comparing the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The formulas for calculating the carbon emission contribution coefficients for each of the aforementioned technical routes are as follows: a i =ΔS i / ∑ΔS i In the formula, α i ΔS is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i Let ∑ΔS be the carbon emission reduction corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route during the evaluation period; i represents the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technical routes; i is the sorting number of the low-carbon technical route.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The formula for calculating the evaluation score of the zero-carbon park is as follows: B(N)=∑α i A i In the formula, B(N) is the evaluation score of the zero-carbon industrial park within period N; N is the evaluation period; α i A is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i The score is given for the i-th low-carbon technology route. i represents the sequence number of the low-carbon technology route.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The technological approach includes one or more of the following: low-carbon energy, low-carbon buildings, low-carbon transportation, ecological carbon sinks, and smart carbon emission management.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The evaluation indicators corresponding to each technical route include one or more of the following: proportion of non-fossil energy consumption, proportion of distributed new energy, proportion of green electricity trading, energy utilization efficiency, level of co-construction and sharing of energy infrastructure, level of energy cascade utilization, electrification rate, energy consumption per unit output value, carbon emissions per unit energy consumption, total amount of flexible resources, utilization rate of flexible resources, usage rate of environmentally friendly building materials, proportion of green buildings, energy consumption per unit building area, carbon emissions per unit building area, level of clean heating and cooling, proportion of new energy transportation vehicles, level of construction of public / shared transportation, degree of perfection of supporting facilities for new energy vehicles, green space ratio, per capita green space area, carbon sink per unit area, level of construction of carbon emission information platform, degree of perfection of carbon monitoring facilities, accuracy rate of carbon emission accounting, level of intelligent management of park production, level of construction and operation of carbon emission management system, and participation of enterprises in the park.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The carbon emission data corresponding to each technical route includes one or more of the following: total energy consumption, fossil energy consumption, distributed new energy power generation, purchased green electricity generation, total number of buildings in the park, number of green buildings, building area, total building energy consumption, building carbon emissions, use of new energy vehicles, number of charging piles / stations, total number of vehicles, planned land area of ​​the park, green area, and carbon reduction from ecological carbon sinks.

8. A comprehensive evaluation system for zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions, characterized in that, include: The data acquisition module is used to determine all the technical routes adopted by the zero-carbon park based on the functional type of the zero-carbon park, and to acquire the carbon emission data and carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technical route within the period. The technology route evaluation module is used to evaluate each technology route based on the carbon emission data corresponding to each technology route within the cycle, using pre-determined evaluation indicators for each technology route, and to obtain the evaluation score for each technology route within the cycle. The contribution coefficient module is used to calculate the carbon emission contribution coefficient of each technology route within the cycle based on the carbon emission reduction corresponding to each technology route within the cycle and the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle. The zero-carbon park evaluation module is used to calculate the evaluation score of the zero-carbon park based on the evaluation score corresponding to each technical route within the cycle and the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to each technical route within the cycle. The evaluation indicators for each technical route are determined based on typical scenarios and evaluation boundaries of zero-carbon parks that cover multiple functional types and include building, energy, and transportation aspects.

9. The system according to claim 8, characterized in that, The contribution coefficient module is specifically used for: The carbon emission reductions corresponding to each technology route within the cycle are summed to obtain the carbon emission reductions corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle. The carbon emission reduction coefficient corresponding to each technology route within the cycle is obtained by comparing the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technology routes within the cycle.

10. The system according to claim 9, characterized in that, The formulas for calculating the carbon emission contribution coefficients for each technical route in the contribution coefficient module are as follows: a i =ΔS i / ∑ΔS i In the formula, α i ΔS is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i Let ∑ΔS be the carbon emission reduction corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route during the evaluation period; i represents the carbon emission reduction corresponding to all technical routes; i is the sorting number of the low-carbon technical route.

11. The system according to claim 8, characterized in that, The formula for calculating the evaluation score of the zero-carbon park is as follows: B(N)=∑α i A i In the formula, B(N) is the evaluation score of the zero-carbon industrial park within period N; N is the evaluation period; α i A is the carbon emission contribution coefficient corresponding to the i-th low-carbon technology route; i The score is given for the i-th low-carbon technology route. i represents the sequence number of the low-carbon technology route.

12. The system according to claim 8, characterized in that, The technological approach includes one or more of the following: low-carbon energy, low-carbon buildings, low-carbon transportation, ecological carbon sinks, and smart carbon emission management.

13. The system according to claim 8, characterized in that, The evaluation indicators corresponding to each technical route include one or more of the following: proportion of non-fossil energy consumption, proportion of distributed new energy, proportion of green electricity trading, energy utilization efficiency, level of co-construction and sharing of energy infrastructure, level of energy cascade utilization, electrification rate, energy consumption per unit output value, carbon emissions per unit energy consumption, total amount of flexible resources, utilization rate of flexible resources, usage rate of environmentally friendly building materials, proportion of green buildings, energy consumption per unit building area, carbon emissions per unit building area, level of clean heating and cooling, proportion of new energy transportation vehicles, level of construction of public / shared transportation, degree of perfection of supporting facilities for new energy vehicles, green space ratio, per capita green space area, carbon sink per unit area, level of construction of carbon emission information platform, degree of perfection of carbon monitoring facilities, accuracy rate of carbon emission accounting, level of intelligent management of park production, level of construction and operation of carbon emission management system, and participation of enterprises in the park.

14. The system according to claim 8, characterized in that, The carbon emission data corresponding to each technical route includes one or more of the following: total energy consumption, fossil energy consumption, distributed new energy power generation, purchased green electricity generation, total number of buildings in the park, number of green buildings, building area, total building energy consumption, building carbon emissions, use of new energy vehicles, number of charging piles / stations, total number of vehicles, planned land area of ​​the park, green area, and carbon reduction from ecological carbon sinks.

15. A computer device, characterized in that, include: At least one processor and memory; The memory is used to store one or more programs; When the one or more programs are executed by the at least one processor, a method for evaluating the comprehensive indicators of zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions, as described in any one of claims 1 to 7, is implemented.

16. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, It contains a computer program, which, when executed, implements a method for evaluating the comprehensive indicators of zero-carbon industrial parks based on actual contributions, as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images