Full-process management method for forcibly preventing human factors and storage medium
By assessing operators on a simulation system and standardizing operations using management work orders, the problem of forced human error by DCS signals was solved, thereby improving the safety of nuclear power units and the stability of operating procedures.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- TAISHAN NUCLEAR POWER JOINT VENTURE CO LTD
- Filing Date
- 2026-01-20
- Publication Date
- 2026-05-08
AI Technical Summary
DCS signals indicate that human error is frequently occurring in nuclear power units, leading to an increase in unplanned events, affecting unit availability and safety performance, and posing a systemic threat.
By acquiring and assessing operators' operational stages, job information, and operational data on a simulation system, and by using management work orders to operate the DCS system, combined with knowledge graphs and interaction matrices to generate management work orders, it is ensured that operators possess the necessary qualifications for actual operation and operate in accordance with specifications.
It has improved operators' awareness of prevention, formed a closed loop of operation inspection, ensured production safety, reduced risks caused by human factors, and ensured the standardization and safety of operation procedures.
Smart Images
Figure CN121998494A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to the field of end-to-end management technology, and in particular to an end-to-end management method and storage medium that forcibly prevents human error. Background Technology
[0002] With the widespread application of DCS in nuclear power units, forced human error caused by DCS signals has become a significant factor affecting the safe operation of nuclear power plants. On average, nuclear power units experience 4-6 unplanned events (IOE / LOE) annually caused by forced human error via DCS signals, accounting for 30%-40% of instrumentation and control human-related events. Forced human error via DCS signals directly impacts unit availability and safety performance through the "operational error - equipment malfunction - safety chain failure" path, posing a systemic threat to the safe operation of nuclear power plants. Summary of the Invention
[0003] The technical problem to be solved by this invention is to provide a full-process management method and storage medium for mandatory prevention of human error.
[0004] The technical solution adopted by this invention to solve its technical problem is: a full-process management method for mandatory prevention of human factors, comprising the following steps: Step S01: When the operator operates on the pre-built simulation system, the operator's operation stage, job information, and operation information are obtained; Step S02: Based on the operator's operation stage, job information, and operation information, assess the operator and determine whether the operator has the actual operation qualification based on the assessment results; Step S03: When the operator has the actual operation qualification, obtain the pre-created management work order table, wherein the management work order table includes operation information and operation risks for different positions and responsibilities at different stages, so that the operator can operate the DCS system according to the operation information and trap information of the corresponding position and responsibilities at the corresponding stage in the management work order table.
[0005] Optionally, it also includes: Step S04: Assess the operator's practical performance based on the operator's operation information in the DCS system; Step S05: Determine the operator's actual operating permissions based on the assessment results; Step S06: When the actual operating permissions are lower than the preset requirements, re-execute step S01.
[0006] Optionally, step S01 includes: The operation stage and job information corresponding to the simulation system are preset in advance; The operation information is obtained based on the operator's actions on the simulation system.
[0007] Optionally, step S02 includes: Match the corresponding assessment criteria based on the operational stage and the job information; The operational information is compared with the assessment criteria to obtain the assessment results.
[0008] Optionally, comparing the operation information with the assessment criteria to obtain the assessment result includes: The operation information is compared with the assessment criteria to obtain the operator's operation score; The operator's operational authority is determined based on the operator's total operational score, and the assessment result is obtained.
[0009] Optionally, comparing the operation information with the assessment criteria to obtain the operator's operation score includes: Based on the risk classification standard of the assessment criteria, the operation items corresponding to the operation information are weighted and assigned values to obtain the item scores. Obtain the execution status of the operation from the operation information; The execution state and the item integral are mapped through the operation item, and then the operation integral is calculated to obtain the operation integral.
[0010] Optionally, the following steps are included before step S03: Information extraction techniques are used to convert design documents and historical data into knowledge graphs. Based on the knowledge graph and operational positions, an interaction matrix is established; The management work order table is generated based on the interaction matrix and the knowledge graph.
[0011] Optionally, the step of converting design documents and historical data into a knowledge graph using information extraction technology includes: Using the information extraction technology, operational specifications, operational principles, and safety specifications are obtained from the design document, and a mind map is created. The historical data is mapped onto the mind map using structured data to obtain the knowledge graph.
[0012] Optionally, establishing an interaction matrix based on the knowledge graph and operational positions includes: The operational positions are matched with the knowledge graph to obtain the job responsibilities for the operational phase. The interaction matrix is obtained by combining the operational positions, their responsibilities, and the operational stages into binary combinations.
[0013] A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the boron concentration control method for the cooling circuit of a nuclear power unit as described in any of the preceding claims.
[0014] The implementation of this invention has the following beneficial effects: This invention allows operators to operate and be assessed on a pre-built simulation system. The assessment results then determine whether the operator is qualified for actual operation. If qualified, the operator operates the DCS system according to the operational information and potential pitfalls associated with the corresponding stage and role in the management work order form. This invention trains and assesses operators through a simulation system and management work order forms, thereby improving personnel's awareness of safety precautions. Simultaneously, a closed-loop operation inspection system is formed based on the management work order forms, further ensuring production safety. Attached Figure Description
[0015] The present invention will be further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments: Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a full-process management method for mandatory prevention of human factors in one embodiment. Detailed Implementation
[0016] To provide a clearer understanding of the technical features, objectives, and effects of the present invention, specific embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[0017] In the following description, specific details such as particular system architectures and techniques are set forth for illustrative purposes and not for limitation, in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments of the invention. However, those skilled in the art will understand that the invention can be implemented in other embodiments without these specific details. In other instances, detailed descriptions of well-known systems, apparatuses, circuits, and methods are omitted so as not to obscure the description of the invention with unnecessary detail.
[0018] This invention provides a full-process management method for mandatory prevention of human factors, such as... Figure 1 As shown, it includes the following steps: Step S01: When the operator operates on the pre-built simulation system, the system obtains the operator's operation stage, job information, and operation information.
[0019] The pre-built simulation systems include DCS small platform simulators or DCS systems with the smallest granularity.
[0020] Based on the acquired operation stage, job information, and operation data, the system automatically performs comparative analysis. It matches the operator's current operation stage with the preset standard operating procedures to determine if they are in the correct stage. If a deviation is found, a timely warning is issued to prevent operator errors due to incorrect operation sequence, which could lead to review failure. Next, based on the job information, the system retrieves the corresponding operating permissions and specifications for that job, checking whether the operator's actions are within their authorized scope and comply with job operation standards. Unauthorized or unauthorized operations are intercepted and recorded in real time. Finally, the system performs a detailed analysis of the operation information, including actions and parameter settings, comparing it with pre-stored correct operation data. If non-standard actions or incorrect parameter settings are found, the system immediately provides the operator with specific error information and correction suggestions, and records the corresponding erroneous operation for subsequent evaluation of the operator's behavior.
[0021] Step S02: Based on the operator's operation stage, job information, and operation information, assess the operator and determine whether the operator has the actual operation qualification based on the assessment results.
[0022] Specifically, during the assessment process, the operator's performance at each stage of the operation will be tallied, including whether it was completed within the specified time and the quality of the completion, in order to evaluate their familiarity with the operating procedures and their execution capabilities.
[0023] For job information assessment, we will examine whether operators understand their own job responsibilities, authority, and collaboration requirements with other positions. This will be assessed through simulated scenarios or actual work performance to determine their job awareness level. Regarding operational information, we will analyze operators' operation records in detail, such as the standardization of their actions and the accuracy of parameter settings. The assessment criteria for job information can be set based on the management work order form.
[0024] The operator's assessment result is determined based on the comprehensive score of these evaluation indicators. If the assessment result meets the preset standard, it indicates that the operator possesses sufficient operational skills and knowledge to accurately and safely complete relevant operational tasks, and thus they are deemed qualified to perform actual operations and are allowed to operate independently. Conversely, if the assessment result fails to meet the standard, it indicates that the operator has shortcomings in certain areas and needs further training and guidance. Until they pass a reassessment, they will not be granted actual operation qualifications to ensure the standardization and safety of the entire operational process.
[0025] Step S03: When qualified to operate, obtain the pre-created management work order form, which includes operation information and operation risks for different positions and responsibilities at different stages, so that operators can operate the DCS system according to the operation information and pitfall information of the corresponding positions and responsibilities at the corresponding stages in the management work order form.
[0026] After receiving the management work order form, operators must carefully study its contents to clarify their responsibilities and specific tasks at the current operational stage. For operational information, operators must accurately grasp each step, requirement, and parameter setting range to ensure accuracy and standardization. Simultaneously, regarding operational risks, especially potential pitfalls, operators must take preventative measures in advance and remain highly vigilant during operation to avoid incidents caused by negligence or errors. When operating the DCS system based on the management work order form, operators must strictly follow the procedures and standards specified in the form. If any questions or abnormalities are encountered during operation, operators must promptly report to their superiors and seek guidance to ensure the smooth progress of the entire operation and the stable operation of the system.
[0027] This invention trains and assesses operators through a pre-built simulation system and management work order forms, thereby improving personnel's awareness of safety precautions. Simultaneously, it establishes a closed-loop operation inspection system based on the management work order forms, further ensuring production safety.
[0028] In some embodiments, it also includes: Step S04: Assess the operator's practical skills based on the operator's operation information in the DCS system.
[0029] Specifically, this can be achieved by recording every step, time, and parameter setting of the operator's operation in the DCS system and comparing it with a pre-defined standard operating procedure. Operations with complete steps, reasonable time, and parameters within the specified range receive positive feedback; operations with missing steps, excessively long or short times, or parameters outside the range are penalized according to the severity of the problem. Furthermore, specific assessment indicators, such as accuracy and stability, can be set to more comprehensively evaluate the operator's practical skills. This assessment method allows for the timely identification of problems and deficiencies in the operator's operation, providing a targeted basis for subsequent training and improvement.
[0030] Step S05: Determine the operator's actual operating authority based on the assessment results.
[0031] Furthermore, based on the assessment scores, operators are divided into different levels. Operators with excellent assessment results and high standards in all operational indicators are granted broader and deeper practical operational authority, such as operating more complex and critical equipment systems and performing challenging parameter adjustments. Operators with average assessment results and some operational issues, but not serious ones, have their operational authority partially restricted, allowing only basic and routine operations. Targeted training and guidance are provided, and their operational authority is gradually restored and expanded after they improve their skills and pass a reassessment. Operators with poor assessment results and numerous serious operational issues have most of their practical operational authority temporarily suspended, undergoing comprehensive and systematic intensive training. After passing a reassessment, appropriate operational authority is cautiously granted based on the actual situation. This approach effectively ensures the safety and stability of the operational process and reduces risks caused by human factors.
[0032] Step S06: When the actual operating permissions are lower than the preset requirements, re-execute step S01.
[0033] After re-executing step S01, a comprehensive competency assessment and evaluation of the operator will be conducted again, including tests of theoretical knowledge and assessments of practical operational skills. Based on the results of the re-evaluation, the operator's actual operational authority will be redefined according to the established authority allocation rules. If the operator's performance after the re-evaluation meets or exceeds the preset requirements, they will be granted the corresponding level of operational authority, enabling them to participate in appropriate work tasks. If the operator's actual operational authority after the re-evaluation is still below the preset requirements, targeted training courses will be arranged to strengthen their learning and training in weak areas, followed by another evaluation until their operational level meets the preset requirements. Through this cyclical assessment and authority adjustment mechanism, it is ensured that each operator possesses the capabilities commensurate with their actual operational authority, thereby guaranteeing the safe and efficient operation of the entire workflow.
[0034] In some embodiments, step S01 includes: The operation stages and job information corresponding to the simulation system are preset.
[0035] When pre-setting the operation stages and job information for the simulation system, the specific tasks, required skills, and corresponding job responsibilities for each stage are planned in detail. For example, for the basic operation stage, basic operation procedures and safety regulations training are set, and the corresponding job is novice operator, mainly undertaking auxiliary work; for the intermediate operation stage, more complex operation tasks and problem-solving ability training are set, and the corresponding job is skilled operator, who can independently complete routine work tasks; while for the advanced operation stage, high-difficulty operation challenges and emergency handling ability training are set, and the corresponding job is senior operator or supervisor, responsible for guiding and supervising the work of other operators to ensure the smoothness and safety of the entire operation process. Through such meticulous settings, it can be ensured that each operator can maximize their effectiveness in the stage and job that suits them best.
[0036] Operational information is obtained based on the operator's actions on the simulation system.
[0037] This operational information includes, but is not limited to, the time, accuracy, error types, and problem-solving strategies employed by operators at each stage of the task. By collecting and analyzing this information, it is possible to accurately assess each operator's actual skill level and determine whether they are well-suited to their current stage and role. Furthermore, the operational information can identify potential problems in the operational process, such as error-prone or inefficient steps, providing a strong basis for subsequent optimization and improvement. Moreover, based on the individual differences reflected in the operational information, personalized training programs can be developed for operators, promoting continuous skill improvement and better adaptation to job requirements.
[0038] In some embodiments, step S02 includes: Match the corresponding assessment standards according to the operational stage and job information.
[0039] When matching assessment criteria, the complexity of the operational phase, the importance of job responsibilities, and the level of required skills will be comprehensively considered.
[0040] The assessment criteria are matched from three perspectives: 1. Basic Operating Procedures Based on the operational stage and job information, corresponding basic operating procedures are matched. By assessing the operator's mastery of these procedures and adherence to safety regulations, it is ensured that they can correctly and safely complete auxiliary tasks. Furthermore, their ability to independently and efficiently complete routine tasks can be evaluated to ensure their competence in guidance and supervision, guaranteeing the smoothness and safety of the entire operational process. This refined matching of assessment standards allows for a more objective and accurate evaluation of each operator's performance, ensuring that each operator has a deep understanding of their role and responsibilities.
[0041] The operational information is compared with the assessment standards to obtain the assessment results.
[0042] The process of obtaining assessment results first requires collecting actual operational information generated by operators at each stage of operation. This information includes, but is not limited to, the execution of operational procedures, records of compliance with safety regulations, completion time of operational tasks, types and frequency of problem-solving, and specific performance in teamwork. Then, this collected operational information is meticulously compared with pre-set assessment standards tailored to different operational stages and job responsibilities. During the comparison process, the accuracy and completeness of the data must be ensured to avoid biases in the assessment results due to missing or incorrect information. Through comparative analysis, the performance of each operator on various assessment indicators can be clearly seen, leading to objective and fair assessment results. The assessment results not only reflect the current work level of the operators but also provide important reference for their subsequent training, promotion, and career development planning.
[0043] In some embodiments, the operational information is compared with the assessment criteria to obtain the assessment result, including: The operator's operational information is compared with the assessment criteria to obtain the operator's operational score.
[0044] The operator's performance score is calculated by accumulating the corresponding points based on the operational information in the assessment criteria. For example, regarding the execution of operational procedures, full marks are awarded if the standard procedures are followed completely, while points are deducted for any deviations. For safety compliance records, points are deducted for each violation. For task completion time, points are awarded for completing tasks ahead of schedule, while points are deducted for exceeding the time limit. Points are also awarded based on the type and frequency of problem-solving, with higher scores for successfully resolving complex problems and lower scores for simple problems, with points added cumulatively based on the number of problems solved. Teamwork performance is also assessed based on the operator's role in the team and the level of coordination with team members. Through this comprehensive and detailed comparison and calculation, the operator's performance score is ultimately determined.
[0045] The operator's operational authority is determined based on their total operational points, and the assessment results are obtained.
[0046] Specifically, different score ranges can be set to correspond to different levels of operational permissions. When an operator's total operational score is in a high score range, they are granted high-level operational permissions, allowing them to perform complex and critical tasks. If their total operational score is in a medium score range, they are granted medium-level operational permissions, allowing them to perform some routine operations. When their total operational score is in a low score range, they are granted only basic operational permissions, restricting them to simple and basic operations. In this way, the operational permissions of operators are accurately determined based on their operational scores, resulting in a comprehensive and reasonable evaluation.
[0047] In some embodiments, comparing operational information with assessment criteria to obtain operator operational scores includes: Based on the risk classification criteria of the assessment standards, weights are assigned to the operational items corresponding to the operational information to obtain item scores.
[0048] After obtaining the task points, the operator's total task points over a given period are aggregated based on the points for each task and pre-defined scoring rules. This aggregation process is not a simple addition of values; it considers factors such as the correlation between different tasks, the frequency of operations, and the time span of operations. For example, for frequently occurring and interconnected tasks, appropriate weighting adjustments are made based on their inherent logical relationships during aggregation to ensure that the final task points more accurately reflect the operator's actual work performance and operational capabilities. Simultaneously, for operations with a large time span, points are attenuated based on the time elapsed, giving more recent performance a greater impact on the total score and thus reflecting changes in the operator's status more promptly. Through this scientifically sound aggregation method, the operator's total task points are ultimately derived.
[0049] Obtain the execution status of the operation from the operation information.
[0050] After obtaining the execution status of the operations, it is necessary to further classify and record the execution status in detail. For example, the execution status can be subdivided into different categories such as completed, incomplete, and abnormally interrupted, and each category should be accurately defined and labeled. For completed operations, record relevant information such as completion time and quality; for incomplete operations, analyze the reasons for incompleteness, whether it is due to insufficient resources, operational difficulties, or other external factors; for abnormally interrupted operations, record the interruption time, cause, and subsequent handling measures in detail. Through such comprehensive and detailed information acquisition and recording, an accurate and reliable basis can be provided for subsequent score calculation and operator performance evaluation.
[0051] The execution status and event integral are mapped through the operation event, and then the operation integral is calculated.
[0052] The calculation process begins by assigning a base score to each operation based on pre-defined scoring rules. This base score takes into account factors such as the complexity, importance, and time consumption of the operation. Then, the base score is adjusted according to the different execution status categories. For example, completed operations with high quality receive the full base score or additional points; incomplete operations have a certain percentage of base score deducted based on the severity of the reason for incompleteness; and operations that are abnormally interrupted are adjusted based on the reason for the interruption and the effectiveness of subsequent handling measures. This calculation method more objectively and fairly reflects the operator's performance in each operation, thus obtaining accurate operation scores.
[0053] In some embodiments, the steps preceding step S03 include: Information extraction techniques are used to convert design documents and historical data into knowledge graphs.
[0054] In the process of converting design documents and historical data into a knowledge graph, the first step is to preprocess the documents and data to remove noise and invalid information, ensuring data quality and accuracy. Next, information extraction algorithms are used to extract key entities, attributes, and relationships between them from the preprocessed data. These key entities may include operational items, execution status, and integration rules, while attributes cover specific indicators such as complexity, importance, time consumption, and completion quality.
[0055] An interaction matrix is established based on knowledge graphs and operational roles.
[0056] In establishing the interaction matrix, the specific responsibilities and task requirements of each operational position are first clarified, and this position information is used as the rows of the matrix. Then, based on the key entities and attributes contained in the knowledge graph, such as operational tasks and execution status, these are used as the columns of the matrix. By analyzing the degree of association and interaction frequency between each operational position and the entities and attributes in the knowledge graph, specific interaction values are filled into the corresponding positions in the matrix. These values can intuitively reflect the closeness between different operational positions and various parts of the knowledge graph, thus providing a clear and accurate quantitative basis for subsequent personnel allocation, task assignment, and collaborative work in the entire process management.
[0057] A management work order form is generated based on the interaction matrix and knowledge graph.
[0058] When generating management work order forms, the system first reads data from the interaction matrix, analyzing the degree of association and interaction frequency between each operational role and entities and attributes in the knowledge graph. Then, combining specific information from the knowledge graph, such as the execution requirements and status of operational tasks, it automatically generates management work orders that meet actual needs. These work orders not only clearly define the specific tasks and requirements of each operational role but also provide the priority and timing of task execution, ensuring that all tasks in the entire process management can be carried out in an orderly and efficient manner. Simultaneously, the management work order form also has a dynamic adjustment function, capable of updating work order content in real time according to actual work progress and changes, ensuring the flexibility and adaptability of management work.
[0059] In one embodiment, the management work order form is shown in the table below. Based on the interaction matrix and knowledge graph, the DCS system operation is divided into five stages and eight positions. The table below shows the responsibilities corresponding to the eight positions under the five stages. These responsibilities include the backup measures for each position and potential failure pitfalls.
[0060] In some embodiments, information extraction techniques are used to convert design documents and historical data into a knowledge graph, including: Information extraction techniques are used to extract operating specifications, operating principles, and safety specifications from design documents, and then a mind map is created.
[0061] By extracting past operation records, problem-solving cases, and performance metrics from historical data, the content of the mind map is further enriched. The design documents are deeply integrated with information obtained from historical data, removing duplicates and contradictions to form a complete and accurate knowledge system. Based on this knowledge system, the mind map is presented visually, enabling operators to intuitively understand operating procedures, principles, and safety regulations. They can also clearly see relevant cases and metrics from historical data, providing strong reference and guidance for practical operations.
[0062] Historical data is mapped onto mind maps using structured data to create knowledge graphs.
[0063] This mapping method allows various types of information from historical data, such as past operation records, problem-solving cases, and performance metrics, to be precisely located on the corresponding nodes of the mind map. This not only enriches and expands the knowledge graph's content but also enables operators to quickly locate the historical data they need, better integrating historical experience with practical operations. Simultaneously, the structured data mapping ensures the accuracy and consistency of data within the mind map, avoiding misunderstandings caused by data clutter and providing solid and reliable knowledge support for end-to-end management.
[0064] In some embodiments, an interaction matrix is established based on the knowledge graph and operational roles, including: By matching operational positions with knowledge graphs, the job responsibilities for each operational phase can be obtained.
[0065] In the implementation process, the specific responsibilities and work content of each operational position are first clearly defined. Then, this position information is precisely matched with the constructed knowledge graph. Through this matching, the responsibilities of each position in each operational stage can be clearly defined, including but not limited to the execution of operational procedures, compliance with safety regulations, and handling of abnormal situations. In this way, operators can understand their specific tasks and requirements at different operational stages based on the matching results, thereby improving the accuracy and standardization of operations and effectively reducing the risk of human error.
[0066] By combining the operational positions, job responsibilities, and operational stages into binary combinations, an interaction matrix is obtained.
[0067] This binary combination approach creates an interaction matrix that presents the job responsibilities of different operational roles at each stage of the operation in an intuitive and clear manner. Specifically, rows represent operational roles, columns represent operational stages, and each element details the specific responsibilities of that role at that stage. For example, for a particular operational role at a specific stage, its responsibilities might include inspecting specific equipment, recording data, and collaborating with other roles. This interaction matrix not only provides operators with clear work guidelines but also facilitates monitoring and management of the entire operational process, ensuring that each step is executed accurately according to established standards and requirements, thereby further improving the efficiency and quality of the entire process management.
[0068] A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements a boron concentration control method for a nuclear power unit cooling circuit as described above.
[0069] The above embodiments only illustrate preferred embodiments of the present invention, and their descriptions are relatively specific and detailed, but they should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention. It should be noted that those skilled in the art can freely combine the above technical features without departing from the concept of the present invention, and can also make several modifications and improvements, all of which fall within the protection scope of the present invention. Therefore, all equivalent transformations and modifications made with respect to the scope of the claims of the present invention should fall within the scope of the claims of the present invention.
Claims
1. A comprehensive management method for mandatory prevention of human error, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: Step S01: When the operator operates on the pre-built simulation system, the operator's operation stage, job information, and operation information are obtained; Step S02: Based on the operator's operation stage, job information, and operation information, assess the operator and determine whether the operator has the actual operation qualification based on the assessment results; Step S03: When the operator has the actual operation qualification, obtain the pre-created management work order table, wherein the management work order table includes operation information and operation risks for different positions and responsibilities at different stages, so that the operator can operate the DCS system according to the operation information and trap information of the corresponding position and responsibilities at the corresponding stage in the management work order table.
2. The full-process management method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Also includes: Step S04: Assess the operator's practical performance based on the operator's operation information in the DCS system; Step S05: Determine the operator's actual operating permissions based on the assessment results; Step S06: When the actual operating permissions are lower than the preset requirements, re-execute step S01.
3. The full-process management method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Step S01 includes: The operation stage and job information corresponding to the simulation system are preset in advance; The operation information is obtained based on the operator's actions on the simulation system.
4. The full-process management method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Step S02 includes: Match the corresponding assessment criteria based on the operational stage and the job information; The operational information is compared with the assessment criteria to obtain the assessment results.
5. The full-process management method according to claim 4, characterized in that, The step of comparing the operational information with the assessment criteria to obtain the assessment result includes: The operation information is compared with the assessment criteria to obtain the operator's operation score; The operator's operational authority is determined based on the operator's total operational score, and the assessment result is obtained.
6. The full-process management method according to claim 5, characterized in that, The step of comparing the operation information with the assessment criteria to obtain the operator's operation score includes: Based on the risk classification standard of the assessment criteria, the operation items corresponding to the operation information are weighted and assigned values to obtain the item scores. Obtain the execution status of the operation from the operation information; The execution state and the item integral are mapped through the operation item, and then the operation integral is calculated to obtain the operation integral.
7. The full-process management method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Before step S03, the following are included: Information extraction techniques are used to convert design documents and historical data into knowledge graphs. Based on the knowledge graph and operational positions, an interaction matrix is established; The management work order table is generated based on the interaction matrix and the knowledge graph.
8. The full-process management method according to claim 7, characterized in that, The process of converting design documents and historical data into a knowledge graph using information extraction technology includes: Using the information extraction technology, operational specifications, operational principles, and safety specifications are obtained from the design document, and a mind map is created. The historical data is mapped onto the mind map using structured data to obtain the knowledge graph.
9. The full-process management method according to claim 7, characterized in that, The step of establishing an interaction matrix based on the knowledge graph and operational positions includes: The operational positions are matched with the knowledge graph to obtain the job responsibilities for the operational phase. The interaction matrix is obtained by combining the operational positions, their responsibilities, and the operational stages into binary combinations.
10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the full-process management method for mandatory prevention of human factors as described in any one of claims 1-9.