Method and system applied to collinear operation of rail transit control system and used for preventing mistaken handling of branching access, electronic equipment and readable storage medium

Abstract

The invention discloses a method and system applied to collinear operation of a rail transit control system and used for preventing mistaken handling of a branching route, electronic equipment and a readable storage medium. The method comprises the steps that S102, a train performs normal online tracking operation; s103, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail or not; s104, when the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks whether basic check of the route condition is passed or not; s105, when the route condition basic check is passed, searching all tracks between the current trigger track and the route starting end signal machine, and checking whether all the searched tracks are not occupied by any track or not; and S106, when all the found tracks are not occupied by any track, the LATS system issues a route handling command and waits for successful route handling. The method has the advantages that the risk of mistakenly handling the route of the common line segment in the collinear operation can be effectively reduced, and guarantee is provided for the stable operation of a project and the travel safety of passengers.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of rail transit co-line operation, and in particular to a method, system, electronic device and readable storage medium applied to rail transit control system co-line operation to prevent erroneous handling of branch line routes. Background Art

[0002] With the rapid development of my country's economy and the rapid changes in society, urban rail transit has gradually transitioned from a single line to a traffic network structure formed by multiple lines. Since the resources in the city center are limited and expensive, in order to effectively utilize them and to strengthen the connection between the suburbs and the urban area, many cities have begun to try the co-operation mode of route operation. Its main advantages are: 1) saving construction costs, multiple lines can share tracks to avoid duplication of construction; 2) providing more travel options to meet the diverse travel needs of passengers; 3) optimizing resources to improve capacity, and significantly increasing the total operating mileage on a limited line length. For example, after two lines are operated on the same line, the comprehensive capacity of the line can be greatly improved by optimizing the train running interval and frequency; 4) making full use of the remaining capacity of existing lines.

[0003] Based on the above, co-line operation is an efficient and new operation model. However, in actual application, due to the complexity of co-line operation and other factors, it is easy to make mistakes in handling the co-line segment route. However, there are currently few teams conducting research and development to solve and improve this problem.

[0004] It should be understood that the above statements merely provide background technology related to the present invention and do not necessarily constitute prior art. Summary of the invention

[0005] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method, system, electronic device and readable storage medium for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in common line operation of a rail transit control system. The method checks the route conditions, whether the track section from the trigger rail to the route starting signal is occupied, etc. through the LATS system, which can effectively reduce the risk of erroneous handling of common line segment routes in common line operation, provide guarantee for the stable operation of the project and the travel safety of passengers, and help ensure the accuracy and safety of online train operation.

[0006] In order to achieve the above object, the present invention is implemented by the following technical solutions:

[0007] A method for preventing erroneous handling of branch lines in rail transit control system co-line operation, comprising:

[0008] S102, the train is running normally online;

[0009] S103, LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail;

[0010] S104, when the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks whether the basic inspection of the route conditions has passed;

[0011] S105. When the basic route condition check is passed, all tracks between the current trigger track and the route start signal are searched, and all the tracks found are checked to see if any track is occupied;

[0012] S106. When none of the found tracks is occupied, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to succeed.

[0013] Optionally, in S103, the LATS system periodically detects whether the train is on the trigger rail. If the LATS system detects that the train is not on the trigger rail in the current cycle, the LATS system waits for the next cycle to detect whether the train is on the trigger rail.

[0014] Optionally, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in a period of 1 second.

[0015] Optionally, basic inspection of route conditions includes: checking the equipment occupancy status and switch locking status within the route.

[0016] Optionally, in S104, if the basic check of the route conditions fails, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0017] Optionally, also include:

[0018] S107. If any track among all the tracks found is occupied, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger track in the next cycle.

[0019] Optionally, before S102, the step further includes:

[0020] S101, initialization phase, the LATS system reads the parameters in the configuration file.

[0021] Optionally, the parameters in the configuration file include: route trigger rail, basic conditions that need to be checked, different routes corresponding to different destinations, correspondence between train set number and line number, correspondence between route and line number, and at least one of the correspondence between route and formation.

[0022] Optionally, in S102, the LATS system executes the train tracking logic according to the occupancy and clearance of the track, and the train window of the track where the train is located contains the correct train number and destination number.

[0023] Optionally, also include:

[0024] S205, when the basic route condition check is passed, the LATS system searches for the route number corresponding to the current vehicle group number and the route number corresponding to the route to be processed, and determines whether the two route numbers are consistent;

[0025] S206. If the line numbers of the two are the same, the LATS system sends a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.

[0026] Optionally, also include:

[0027] S207. If the two line numbers are inconsistent, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0028] Optionally, also include:

[0029] S305. When the basic route condition check is passed, the LATS system searches for the marshaling corresponding to the line currently selected for route entry and the current train marshaling, and determines whether the two marshalings are consistent;

[0030] S306. If the two groups are consistent, the LATS system issues an access processing command and waits for the access processing to succeed.

[0031] Optionally, also include:

[0032] S307. If the marshaling of the two trains is inconsistent, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0033] Optionally, in S103, the LATS system reduces the setting range of the trigger rail, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail.

[0034] Optionally, a station server system is provided, wherein the station server system is used to implement the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system.

[0035] Optionally, an electronic device comprises: a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps of the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes applied to co-line operation of a rail transit control system are implemented.

[0036] Optionally, a readable storage medium stores a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system.

[0037] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following advantages:

[0038] The present invention provides a method, system, electronic device and readable storage medium for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in common line operation of a rail transit control system. The method uses a LATS system to check route conditions, whether the track section from the trigger rail to the route start signal is occupied, etc., which can effectively reduce the risk of erroneous handling of common line segment routes in common line operation, provide protection for the project's operational stability and passengers' travel safety, and help ensure the accuracy and safety of train online operation. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0039] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for the description. Obviously, the drawings described below are an embodiment of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative work:

[0040] Figure 1 A Y-shaped collinear schematic diagram of the present invention;

[0041] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a cross-type collinearity of the present invention;

[0042] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a central area collinearity of the present invention;

[0043] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of a method for preventing erroneous handling of branch lines in a rail transit control system co-line operation according to the present invention;

[0044] Figure 5 for Figure 3 A schematic diagram of the central area of ​​the common line Zhongbaoshan Road Station;

[0045] Figure 6 A schematic diagram of another method for preventing erroneous handling of branch lines in a rail transit control system co-line operation according to the present invention;

[0046] Figure 7 It is a schematic diagram of another method of the present invention applied to the co-line operation of a rail transit control system to prevent the erroneous handling of branch line routes. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0047] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solution in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0048] It should be noted that, in this article, the terms "include", "comprises", "has" or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, method, article or terminal device including a series of elements includes not only those elements, but also includes other elements not explicitly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, article or terminal device. In the absence of further restrictions, the elements defined by the sentence "includes..." or "comprising..." do not exclude the existence of other elements in the process, method, article or terminal device including the elements.

[0049] It should be noted that the drawings are all in very simplified form and use inaccurate ratios, and are only used to conveniently and clearly assist in explaining the embodiments of the present invention.

[0050] In actual applications, co-line operation can be applied to different lines in different forms. Figures 1 to 3 As shown, there are the following types: 1) Y-type co-line, taking Chengdu Line 18 and Line 19 as an example; 2) Cross-type co-line, taking Hong Kong LAR Airport Line (including Airport Line and Tung Chung Line) as an example; 3) Central area co-line, taking Shanghai Line 3 and Line 4 as an example. As can be seen from the above, co-line operation is an efficient and new operation mode. However, due to the complexity of co-line operation, it is easy to make mistakes in handling the co-line segment route. For example, in actual applications, it is very likely that the branch line route will be handled incorrectly due to factors such as track occupation, loss of train number or carrying an incorrect train number.

[0051] On the other hand, with the continuous increase in urban residents, the demand for urban rail transit passenger transport is increasing. While new lines are constantly being opened, existing lines are also constantly adding vehicles to improve transport capacity. Technological advances have brought about the continuous introduction of new vehicles, which will lead to the existence of multiple models on the same line or between different lines. For example, Shanghai Line 3 contains 3 models, namely 03A01 electric bus, 03A02 electric bus, and 03A03 electric bus; its co-operating Line 4 has 2 models, namely 04A01 electric bus and 04A02 electric bus. Different models have different lengths, widths, and interfaces, and mixed running will affect normal functions; in addition, considering civil engineering, the gap between the platform and the train may cause safety accidents.

[0052] Figures 1 to 3The center branch route A and branch route B correspond to the routes from the common line section to different lines. After the route is processed, the signal is open, which is the basis for some non-CBTC system vehicles to move forward. The processing of the route is mainly based on the current train identification number and basic interlocking conditions. The existing signal system is based on the non-CBTC system line of the track circuit, such as Shanghai Line 3 / 4 and Hong Kong LAR Airport Line. The ATS train tracking function relies on the track circuit occupation and clearing status from a single source, and cannot guarantee that the train number identified in each extreme case is in line with expectations. Therefore, when the planned train still arrives at the next station with the wrong train number and stops steadily, there is a possibility of automatically processing the wrong route. At the same time, in extreme scenarios such as interlocking interface data transmission lag or abnormal track circuit jump timing, the possibility of vehicle number loss cannot be completely avoided.

[0053] Based on the above factors, the key point is how to avoid incorrectly handling the branch line route when the track is occupied or the train number is lost or has an incorrect train number.

[0054] Based on the above, the present invention provides a method for preventing erroneous handling of branch lines in rail transit control system co-line operation, such as Figure 4 As shown, the method comprises:

[0055] S101, initialization phase, the LATS system (Local Automatic Train Supervision, station server system) reads the parameters in the configuration file (Ars.cfg).

[0056] Optionally, the parameters in the configuration file include at least one of: route trigger rail, basic conditions to be checked, different routes corresponding to different destinations, correspondence between train group number and line number, correspondence between route and line number, and correspondence between route and group. Of course, the parameters in the configuration file may also include other data, which is not limited by the present invention.

[0057] S102. The train is tracked and operated normally online.

[0058] Specifically, in S102, the LATS system executes the train tracking logic according to the occupation and clearance of the track, and the train window of the track where the train is located has the correct train number and destination number.

[0059] S103, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail.

[0060] Furthermore, in S103, the LATS system periodically detects whether the train is on the automatic route trigger rail. If the LATS system detects that the train is not on the trigger rail in the current cycle, the system waits for the LATS system to detect whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0061] Optionally, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in a period of 1 second.

[0062] S104. When the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks whether the basic inspection of the route conditions has been passed.

[0063] Specifically, if the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks the basic conditions of the conditional route on the train's travel path according to the train's destination number. In this embodiment, the basic route condition check includes: checking the occupancy status of the equipment in the route and the lock status of the turnout. Of course, it can also include other conditions. Further, in S104, if the basic route condition check fails, it returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0064] S105. When the basic route condition check is passed, the LATS system searches the data file to find all tracks between the current trigger track and the route start signal, and the LATS system determines whether any of the found tracks is occupied.

[0065] S106. When none of the found tracks is occupied, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to succeed.

[0066] Furthermore, the method of the present invention for preventing erroneous handling of branch routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system also includes: S107, if any track among all the tracks found is occupied, return to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0067] Based on the above, it can be known that in the method of the present invention applied to the common line operation of the rail transit control system to prevent the wrong handling of the branch line route, the LATS system checks the route conditions, whether the track section from the trigger rail to the route starting signal is occupied, etc., which can effectively reduce the risk of wrong handling of the common line section route in common line operation, provide protection for the project's operational stability and passengers' travel safety, and help ensure the accuracy and safety of the train's online operation. On the other hand, this method ensures the correct handling of the route through occupancy checks when the operating scenario remains unchanged. It can achieve effective protection through some project particularities in combination with actual conditions under the existing technical framework, has more anti-error logic, and can maximize the accuracy and safety of line operation.

[0068] like Figure 5 As shown, Figure 3 A schematic diagram of Baoshan Road Station in the embodiment. Figure 5As shown in the figure, the specific route of the Baoshan Road out of the shared line section is: X11H-X5H of Line 3; X11H-X7H of Line 4. The trigger rails are the tracks TC26H, TC28H, and TC30H of this station. The train number of the 413# train entering the station was lost due to the delay of communication messages. When the rear train 32758 arrived at the first trigger rail, it mistakenly triggered the route of Line 3, which in turn caused the Line 4 train in front to enter the Line 3 area, bringing safety risks.

[0069] In practical applications, the above-mentioned method of increasing the occupancy of the inspection section of the present invention can be applied to the co-line operation of the station to reduce the risk of incorrect handling of the branch route. Specifically, after the train passes the basic inspection on the trigger rail and meets the automatic route trigger, the occupancy check of the front track (between the trigger rail and the route start signal) is added. If any track is occupied, the automatic route condition check fails and the route cannot be automatically triggered. Figure 5 When car 32758 tries to automatically trigger the X11H-X5H route, it checks the occupancy of TC28H and TC30H. If they are occupied, automatic route processing is not allowed. When train TC28H tries to automatically trigger the X11H-X5H route, it checks the occupancy of TC30H. If they are occupied, automatic route processing is not allowed. This can effectively avoid the risk of erroneous triggering caused by the loss of the car group number.

[0070] On the other hand, the method for preventing the wrong handling of the branch line route in the rail transit control system co-operation of the present invention further includes: in the above S103, the LATS system reduces the setting range of the trigger rail, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail. In the above manner, the number of trigger rails can be reduced. For example, Figure 5 The original three trigger rails are reduced to the only rail in front of the route, which can effectively avoid the wrong triggering of the route. This method can greatly reduce the risk of wrong handling by modifying the operation scenario, such as only triggering the route on the original last trigger rail. That is, it can greatly reduce the risk of wrong handling of the route through the simplest modification.

[0071] Further, such as Figure 6 As shown, the method of the present invention for preventing erroneous processing of branch line routes in co-line operation of rail transit control systems also includes: S205, when the basic inspection of the route conditions is passed, the LATS system searches the configuration file, finds the line number corresponding to the current car group number and selects the line number corresponding to the route to be processed, and determines whether the two line numbers are consistent through the LATS system; S206, if the two line numbers are consistent, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.

[0072] Furthermore, the method further comprises: S207, if the line numbers of the two are inconsistent, returning to S103, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0073] Based on the above, the present invention provides a method for adding line number checks, and the preceding steps of this method are basically the same as those in the aforementioned method for adding checks on section occupancy. In this method, the parameters of the configuration file read by the LATS system include route trigger rails, basic condition checks, correspondence between car group numbers and line numbers, correspondence between routes and line numbers, etc. In this method, the correspondence between line numbers is added to the physical formation of the train through data configuration; and the correspondence between line numbers is added to the specific routes that can be automatically triggered. When the automatic route trigger meets the basic condition check, a line number check is added to prevent the wrong route from being handled. The above-mentioned method of checking the line number can effectively reduce the risk of incorrectly handling routes in co-line operations. This method can be seen as a further supplement to the aforementioned scheme, and can effectively avoid the risk of trains carrying incorrect train numbers and triggering incorrect routes. In practical applications, this method of adding line number checks can be applied to Figure 2 Of course, it can also be applied to other line types.

[0074] Further, such as Figure 7 As shown, the method of the present invention for preventing erroneous processing of branch line routes in co-line operation of rail transit control systems also includes: S305, when the basic inspection of route conditions is passed, the LATS system searches for the marshaling corresponding to the track line currently selected to process the route and the current train marshaling, and determines whether the two marshalings are consistent through the LATS system; S306, if the two marshalings are consistent, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.

[0075] Furthermore, the method further comprises: S307, if the marshaling of the two trains is inconsistent, returning to S103, the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

[0076] Based on the above method, the present invention also provides a method for increasing train marshaling inspection, and the preceding steps of this method are basically the same as those in the aforementioned method for increasing the inspection section occupancy. In this method, the parameters of the configuration file read by the LATS system include route trigger rails, basic condition checks, correspondence between routes and marshaling, etc. This method fully identifies the characteristics of each line between the co-linear lines, digs out the details, and avoids the risk of erroneous route triggering through simple condition checks. By using the above method of checking train marshaling, the risk of incorrect route handling in co-linear operations can be effectively reduced. In practical applications, this method of increasing train marshaling inspection can be applied to Figure 1In the Y-type co-line operation, the risk of wrong route handling can be reduced. For example, if one line of the co-line operation only runs 8-car marshaling and the other line only runs 4-car marshaling, it is also an effective way to control route handling through marshaling information. Of course, it can also be applied to other line types.

[0077] Based on the above, the present invention provides a variety of automatic inspection methods for the entry and exit conditions of co-line vehicles to ensure the accuracy and safety of train operation. Figure 4 On the basis of the methods shown, one or more of them can be selected according to the needs of the project to increase the automatic handling and strict control of the route of the shared line operation line, fully ensuring that the route handled is what the current train needs, so as to greatly reduce the operational risks caused by the wrong route due to abnormal track circuit tracking. This method effectively solves the pain points and difficult problems that users are concerned about, improves the robustness of the system, and provides a good guarantee for the stable operation of the project site.

[0078] Based on the same inventive concept, the present invention also provides a station server system, which is used to implement the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of rail transit control systems.

[0079] Based on the same inventive concept, the present invention also provides an electronic device, comprising: a memory, a processor, wherein a computer program is stored on the memory, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps of the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system are implemented.

[0080] Based on the same inventive concept, the present invention also provides a readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the aforementioned method for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system are implemented.

[0081] Based on the above, it can be known that the above schemes of the present invention can be automatically calculated by the background server (electronic device), do not involve user operations, do not affect the use and operation of the existing system, and do not disturb the user under the premise of ensuring accuracy. Furthermore, the above scheme designs a variety of methods applicable to the misplacement of routes for co-operating lines, which not only include software modification support, but also data modification support, and have strong versatility and flexibility. Furthermore, the above scheme can effectively reduce the risk of incorrectly handling routes for co-operating lines, and provide guarantees for the operational stability of the project and the travel safety of passengers; further, the above scheme provides solutions to key issues of co-operating lines, and provides ideas for subsequent better solutions.

[0082] In summary, in a method of preventing erroneous handling of branch line approaches in co-line operation of a rail transit control system of the present invention, the LATS system checks the approach conditions, whether the track section from the trigger rail to the approach starting signal is occupied, etc., which can effectively reduce the risk of erroneous handling of co-line segment approaches in co-line operation, provide guarantees for the stable operation of the project and the travel safety of passengers, and help ensure the accuracy and safety of online train operation.

[0083] Furthermore, the present invention adds more condition checks based on the project characteristics on the premise that the basic condition checks for route processing are passed, fully ensuring that the route processed is what the current train needs, which can greatly reduce the operational and safety risks caused by incorrect route processing due to abnormal track circuit tracking, effectively solve the pain points and difficult problems that users are concerned about, improve the robustness of the system, and provide good guarantees for stable operation of the project site.

[0084] Although the content of the present invention has been described in detail through the above preferred embodiments, it should be appreciated that the above description should not be considered as a limitation of the present invention. After reading the above content, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and substitutions of the present invention will occur. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention should be limited by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation, characterized in that: Include: S102, the train is running normally online; S103, LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail; S104, when the train is on the trigger rail, the LATS system checks whether the basic inspection of the route conditions has passed; S105. When the basic route condition check is passed, all tracks between the current trigger track and the route start signal are searched, and all the tracks found are checked to see whether any track is occupied; S106. When none of the found tracks is occupied, the LATS system issues a route processing command and waits for the route processing to succeed.

2. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S103, the LATS system periodically detects whether the train is on the trigger rail. If the LATS system detects that the train is not on the trigger rail in the current cycle, the system waits for the LATS system to detect whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

3. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that: The cycle of the LATS system to detect whether a train is on the trigger rail is 1 second.

4. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The basic inspection of route conditions includes: checking the occupancy status of equipment within the route and the locking status of switches.

5. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S104, if the basic route condition check fails, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

6. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: S107. If any track among all the tracks found is occupied, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger track in the next cycle.

7. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: Before S102, it also includes: S101, initialization phase, the LATS system reads the parameters in the configuration file.

8. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that: The parameters in the configuration file include: route trigger rails, basic conditions that need to be checked, different routes corresponding to different destinations, correspondence between train set number and line number, correspondence between route and line number, and at least one of the correspondence between route and formation.

9. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S102, the LATS system executes the train tracking logic according to the occupation and clearance of the track, and the train window of the track where the train is located has the correct train number and destination number.

10. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: S205, when the basic route condition check is passed, the LATS system searches for the route number corresponding to the current vehicle group number and the route number corresponding to the route to be processed, and determines whether the two route numbers are consistent; S206. If the line numbers of the two are the same, the LATS system sends a route processing command and waits for the route processing to be successful.

11. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in a rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 10, characterized in that: Also includes: S207. If the two line numbers are inconsistent, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

12. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: S305. When the basic route condition check is passed, the LATS system searches for the marshaling corresponding to the line currently selected for route entry and the current train marshaling, and determines whether the two marshalings are consistent; S306. If the two groups are consistent, the LATS system issues an access processing command and waits for the access processing to succeed.

13. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 12, characterized in that: Also includes: S307. If the marshaling of the two trains is inconsistent, the process returns to S103, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail in the next cycle.

14. The method for preventing erroneous handling of line routing in rail transit control system co-line operation as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S103, the LATS system reduces the setting range of the trigger rail, and the LATS system detects whether the train is on the trigger rail.

15. A station server system, characterized in that: The station server system is used to implement the method for preventing erroneous handling of branch lines in co-line operation of a rail transit control system as described in any one of claims 1 to 14.

16. An electronic device, characterized in that: The electronic device includes: a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps of the method for preventing erroneous handling of branch line routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system as described in any one of claims 1 to 14 are implemented.

17. A readable storage medium, characterized in that: The readable storage medium stores a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of a method for preventing erroneous handling of branch routes in co-line operation of a rail transit control system as described in any one of claims 1 to 14.

Images