A method and system for constructing a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment
By analyzing the interaction between the associated communication equipment and data of the communication service type, combining historical operation data and verification deviation data, the verification strategy is determined to perform compatibility verification processing, and the problem of compatibility assessment accuracy in a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment is solved, and efficient and reliable compatibility verification is achieved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411874705.6
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Patents(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-12-19
- Publication Date
- 2025-02-28
- Estimated Expiration
- 2044-12-19
AI Technical Summary
In the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment, there are deviations in the types of communication equipment involved in different communication service types, and there are also large differences in the amount of data processed, which affects the accuracy of the compatibility evaluation results.
By determining the associated communication equipment and its data interaction status of the communication service type, using historical operation data to determine the common data volume interval and operation frequency coefficient, and determining the verification strategy based on the data interaction deviation data and operation frequency coefficient, and carrying out compatibility verification processing for a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment.
Differentiated compatibility verification and processing for different communication service types are realized, the reliability and efficiency of verification processing are ensured, and the accuracy of compatibility evaluation of domestically produced autonomous and controllable environments is improved.
Smart Images

Figure 00000000_0000_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of information systems, and in particular, relates to a method and system for constructing a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment. Background Art
[0002] In order to improve the reliability of communication systems, more and more communication equipment of communication systems are undergoing domestic transformation. At the same time, with the domestic transformation, the compatibility and reliability evaluation of information systems has become a technical problem that needs to be solved urgently.
[0003] In order to evaluate the compatibility and reliability of information systems, the invention patent application CN202311379868.2 "A simulation test method for simulating a domestic production environment" simulates multiple domestic operating environments to find out the system performance and security bottlenecks in different environments, so as to carry out targeted performance optimization and security reinforcement. However, at the same time, the following technical problems exist:
[0004] In a domestically produced, independently controllable environment, there are deviations in the types of communication equipment involved in different types of communication services. At the same time, there are large differences in the amount of data processed corresponding to the communication service types. Therefore, if the compatibility assessment results are not determined based on different types of communication services, the accuracy of the compatibility assessment results of the operating environment cannot be guaranteed.
[0005] In response to the above technical problems, the present invention provides a method and system for constructing a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment. Summary of the invention
[0006] To achieve the purpose of the present invention, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:
[0007] According to one aspect of the present invention, a method for constructing a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment is provided.
[0008] A method for constructing a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment, specifically comprising:
[0009] S1 determines an associated communication device of a communication service type, and when it is determined that the communication service type does not need to adopt a preset verification strategy based on the data interaction of the associated communication device in the communication service type, proceeds to the next step;
[0010] S2 uses the deviation data of the data interaction between the communication service type and other communication service types in the associated communication device to determine that the communication service type does not need to adopt the preset verification strategy, and then proceeds to the next step;
[0011] S3 determines a common data volume interval and an operation frequency coefficient within the processing data volume interval based on the historical operation data of the communication service type within different processing data volume intervals;
[0012] S4 determines the verification deviation data of the data interaction situation with other communication service types based on the data interaction situation and the commonly used data volume interval, and determines the verification strategy of the communication service type in combination with the operation frequency coefficient of different commonly used data volume intervals, and uses the verification strategy to perform compatibility verification processing of the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment to obtain a verification result, and optimizes and constructs the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment based on the verification result.
[0013] The beneficial effects of the present invention are:
[0014] Based on the data interaction of associated communication devices in the communication service type, it is determined whether the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy, thereby realizing the screening of communication service types with a large number of associated communication devices or a large number of data interaction types of associated communication devices, ensuring the reliability of its verification processing, and improving the efficiency of determining the verification strategies for different communication service types.
[0015] The verification strategy is used to perform compatibility verification of the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment and obtain the verification results. This realizes the compatibility verification of the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment from the perspective of different business types, and adopts differentiated compatibility verification methods under different business types. This not only ensures the reliability of the verification process, but also improves the efficiency of the compatibility verification of the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment.
[0016] A further technical solution is that the associated communication device of the communication service type is determined according to the communication devices involved when the communication service type is running.
[0017] A further technical solution is that the data interaction situation includes the data interaction type between associated communication devices in the communication service type.
[0018] A further technical solution is to determine that the communication service type does not need to adopt a preset verification strategy, specifically including:
[0019] Determining data interaction types of different associated communication devices in the communication service type according to data interaction conditions of the associated communication devices in the communication service type;
[0020] Determine, based on the data interaction type, the number of associated communication devices with which data interaction exists in the communication service type;
[0021] Whether the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy is determined according to the number of associated communication devices with which data interaction exists.
[0022] A further technical solution is that when the number of associated communication devices with data interaction is greater than the preset number of communication devices, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy.
[0023] A further technical solution is that the preset verification strategy is to verify the associated communication devices under the communication service type based on all data volume intervals.
[0024] A further technical solution is to use the verification strategy to perform compatibility verification processing on the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment to obtain a verification result, which specifically includes:
[0025] Based on the verification strategy, compatibility verification is performed on the associated communication equipment under the communication service type to obtain a verification result.
[0026] A further technical solution is to optimize and construct a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment based on the verification results, specifically including:
[0027] Based on the verification results, the communication equipment with compatibility problems in the domestically produced, independently controllable environment is determined, and targeted optimization processing is performed on the communication equipment with compatibility problems.
[0028] In a second aspect, the present invention provides a computer system comprising: a memory and a processor that are communicatively connected, and a computer program stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor, wherein the processor executes the above-mentioned method for constructing a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment when running the computer program.
[0029] Other features and advantages will be described in the following description. The objects and other advantages of the present invention are realized and obtained by the structures particularly pointed out in the description and drawings.
[0030] In order to make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, preferred embodiments are given below and described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0031] The above and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by describing in detail exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings;
[0032] Figure 1 It is a flowchart of a method for constructing a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment;
[0033] Figure 2 is a flow chart of a method for determining that a communication service type does not require the use of a preset verification strategy;
[0034] Figure 3is a flow chart of a method for determining a commonly used data volume interval within a processing data volume interval;
[0035] Figure 4 is a flow chart of a method for determining a verification strategy for a communication service type;
[0036] Figure 5 It is a framework diagram of a computer system. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0037] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in this specification, the technical solutions in the embodiments of this specification will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of this specification. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of this specification, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this specification, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work should fall within the scope of protection of this specification.
[0038] In a domestically produced, independently controllable environment, there are deviations in the types of communication equipment involved in different types of communication services. At the same time, there are large differences in the amount of data processed corresponding to the communication service types. Therefore, it is necessary to use different communication service types to conduct compatibility assessment results, so as to ensure the accuracy of the compatibility assessment results of the operating environment.
[0039] Determining the communication service type does not require the use of a preset verification strategy: When the number of associated communication devices with data interaction is greater than the preset number of communication devices, determining the communication service type requires the use of a preset verification strategy.
[0040] According to the associated communication devices that have deviations in data interaction types between the communication service type and other communication service types, they are used as deviation communication devices. When the number of deviation communication devices does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy.
[0041] Commonly used data volume intervals within the processing data volume interval: based on the historical operation data of the communication service type in different processing data volume intervals, the historical operation time of the communication service type in the processing data volume interval is determined; based on the proportion of the historical operation time in the historical operation time of the communication service type, the operation frequency coefficient of the communication service type in the processing data volume interval is determined; when the operation frequency coefficient is greater than 0.6, the processing data volume interval is determined to be a commonly used data volume interval.
[0042] Verification strategy for communication service types: Based on the verification deviation data of data interaction with other communication service types, determine the data interaction types that deviate from other communication service types in the commonly used data volume range, and use them as deviation interaction types, determine the interaction deviation coefficients of different deviation interaction types according to the weights of the operation frequency coefficients of the commonly used data volume ranges corresponding to different deviation interaction types, and determine the comprehensive interaction deviation coefficient through the average values of the interaction deviation coefficients of different deviation interaction types, determine the set verification strategy corresponding to the comprehensive interaction deviation coefficient based on the comprehensive interaction deviation coefficient, and use the preset verification strategy to determine the verification strategy for the communication service type.
[0043] The verification strategy includes verifying the associated communication devices under the communication service type based on all data volume intervals and verifying the associated communication devices under the communication service type based on the commonly used data volume intervals.
[0044] Embodiment 1 To solve the above-mentioned problem, according to one aspect of the present invention, Figure 1 As shown, a method for constructing a domestically-produced autonomous and controllable environment is provided, which specifically includes:
[0045] S1 determines an associated communication device of a communication service type, and when it is determined that the communication service type does not need to adopt a preset verification strategy based on the data interaction of the associated communication device in the communication service type, proceeds to the next step;
[0046] S2 uses the deviation data of the data interaction between the communication service type and other communication service types in the associated communication device to determine that the communication service type does not need to adopt the preset verification strategy, and then proceeds to the next step;
[0047] S3 determines a common data volume interval and an operation frequency coefficient within the processing data volume interval based on the historical operation data of the communication service type within different processing data volume intervals;
[0048] S4 determines the verification deviation data of the data interaction situation with other communication service types based on the data interaction situation and the commonly used data volume interval, and determines the verification strategy of the communication service type in combination with the operation frequency coefficient of different commonly used data volume intervals, and uses the verification strategy to perform compatibility verification processing of the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment to obtain a verification result, and optimizes and constructs the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment based on the verification result.
[0049] Furthermore, the associated communication device of the communication service type is determined according to the communication devices involved when the communication service type is running.
[0050] Specifically, the data interaction situation includes the data interaction type between associated communication devices in the communication service type.
[0051] It should be noted that if Figure 2 As shown, determining that the communication service type does not need to adopt a preset verification strategy specifically includes:
[0052] Determining data interaction types of different associated communication devices in the communication service type according to data interaction conditions of the associated communication devices in the communication service type;
[0053] Determine, based on the data interaction type, the number of associated communication devices with which data interaction exists in the communication service type;
[0054] Whether the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy is determined according to the number of associated communication devices with which data interaction exists.
[0055] It is understandable that when the number of associated communication devices with data interaction is greater than the preset number of communication devices, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy.
[0056] Further, determining that the communication service type does not need to adopt a preset verification strategy specifically includes:
[0057] Determining data interaction types of different associated communication devices in the communication service type according to data interaction conditions of the associated communication devices in the communication service type;
[0058] Determine the number of data interaction types of different associated communication devices in the communication service type based on the data interaction type, and determine the data interaction coefficients of different associated communication devices based on the number of data interaction types;
[0059] A comprehensive interaction coefficient is determined according to data interaction coefficients of different associated communication devices, and based on the comprehensive interaction coefficient, it is determined whether the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy.
[0060] It should also be noted that the data interaction coefficient of the associated communication device is determined according to the ratio of the number of data interaction types to the number of preset interaction types.
[0061] It can be understood that the comprehensive interaction coefficient is determined according to the weighted sum of the data interaction coefficients of different associated communication devices.
[0062] In another embodiment, determining that the communication service type does not need to adopt a preset verification strategy specifically includes:
[0063] S11 obtains the number of associated communication devices of the communication service type, and determines a basic weight coefficient of the communication service type by using the number of associated communication devices of the communication service type;
[0064] Optionally, the above step S11 includes steps S111-S113, which are specifically:
[0065] S111 obtains the number of associated communication devices of the communication service type. When the number of associated communication devices of the communication service type is greater than the preset number of devices, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy. When the number of associated communication devices of the communication service type is not greater than the preset number of devices, proceeds to step S112;
[0066] S112: When the number of associated communication devices of the communication service type is within the preset device number interval, proceed to step S113; when the number of associated communication devices of the communication service type is within the preset device number interval, it is determined that the communication service type does not need to adopt the preset verification strategy;
[0067] S113 determines the basic weight coefficient of the communication service type by using the number of associated communication devices of the communication service type, and proceeds to step S12.
[0068] S12 determines the data interaction types of different associated communication devices in the communication service type according to the data interaction conditions of the associated communication devices in the communication service type, and determines the data interaction coefficients of different associated communication devices based on the data interaction types between the associated communication device and other associated communication devices;
[0069] Optionally, the above step S12 includes steps S121-S123, specifically:
[0070] S121 determines the data interaction types of different associated communication devices in the communication service type according to the data interaction situation of the associated communication device in the communication service type; when the total number of data interaction types of the associated communication device in the communication service type is greater than the preset number of types, determines that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy; when the total number of data interaction types of the associated communication device in the communication service type is not greater than the preset number of types, proceeds to step S122;
[0071] S122 performs different data interaction types of associated communication devices in the communication service type with different associated communication devices, and uses the number of data interaction types to calculate the number of interactive communication devices in the associated communication devices. When the number of interactive communication devices is greater than the preset number of interactive devices, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy. When the number of interactive communication devices is not greater than the preset number of interactive devices, the process proceeds to step S123.
[0072] S123 determines the data interaction coefficients of different associated communication devices based on the data interaction type between the associated communication device and other associated communication devices. When the average value of the data interaction coefficients of different associated communication devices is greater than the preset interaction coefficient threshold, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy. When the average value of the data interaction coefficients of different associated communication devices is not greater than the preset interaction coefficient threshold, proceed to step S13.
[0073] S13 determines a comprehensive interaction coefficient according to the data interaction coefficients of different associated communication devices and the basic weight coefficient, and determines whether the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy based on the comprehensive interaction coefficient.
[0074] Optionally, the above step S13 includes steps S131-S133, specifically:
[0075] When it is determined in step S131 that there is an associated communication device whose data interaction coefficient is greater than a preset coefficient threshold according to the data interaction coefficients of different associated communication devices, the process proceeds to step S132; when there is no associated communication device whose data interaction coefficient is greater than the preset coefficient threshold, the process proceeds to step S133;
[0076] S132: When the number of associated communication devices whose data interaction coefficient is greater than the preset coefficient threshold is not within the preset communication device number interval, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy; when the number of associated communication devices whose data interaction coefficient is greater than the preset coefficient threshold is within the preset communication device number interval, proceed to step S133;
[0077] S133 determines a comprehensive interaction coefficient according to the data interaction coefficients of different associated communication devices and the basic weight coefficient, and determines whether the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy based on the comprehensive interaction coefficient.
[0078] Furthermore, the deviation data of the data interaction situation of the associated communication devices includes associated communication devices whose data interaction types deviate from those of other communication service types.
[0079] It should also be noted that the communication service type does not need to adopt a preset verification strategy, which specifically includes:
[0080] Based on the deviation data of the data interaction between the communication service type and other communication service types in the associated communication device, determine the associated communication device in which the data interaction type between the communication service type and other communication service types deviates, and use it as the deviation communication device;
[0081] Whether the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy is determined according to the number of deviation communication devices.
[0082] It can be understood that when the number of deviation communication devices is greater than the preset number of deviation devices, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy.
[0083] It should also be noted that the communication service type does not need to adopt a preset verification strategy, which specifically includes:
[0084] Based on the deviation data of the data interaction between the communication service type and other communication service types in the associated communication device, determine the associated communication device in which the data interaction type between the communication service type and other communication service types deviates, and use it as the deviation communication device;
[0085] The deviation quantity of the deviation interaction type of the communication service type is determined according to the deviation situation of the data interaction type of different deviation communication devices, and whether the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy is determined based on the deviation quantity of the deviation interaction type.
[0086] It is understandable that the communication service type does not need to adopt a preset verification strategy, which specifically includes:
[0087] S21 determines, based on the deviation data of the data interaction between the communication service type and other communication service types in the associated communication device, an associated communication device in which the data interaction type between the communication service type and other communication service types deviates, and uses the associated communication device as the deviation communication device;
[0088] S22 determines the deviation amount of the deviation interaction type of different deviation communication devices according to the deviation situation of the data interaction type of different deviation communication devices, and determines the interaction deviation coefficient of different deviation communication devices by using the deviation amount of the deviation interaction type;
[0089] S23 determines a comprehensive deviation coefficient of the communication service type according to the interaction deviation coefficients of different deviation communication devices, and determines whether the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy based on the comprehensive deviation coefficient.
[0090] Further, the interaction deviation coefficient of the deviation communication device is determined according to a preset deviation coefficient corresponding to the deviation number of the deviation interaction type of the deviation communication device.
[0091] Specifically, the comprehensive deviation coefficient of the communication service type is determined according to the product of the interaction deviation coefficients of different deviation communication devices.
[0092] It can be understood that when the comprehensive deviation coefficient of the communication service type is greater than the preset deviation coefficient threshold, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy.
[0093] Optionally, the above step S21 includes steps S211-S212, which are specifically:
[0094] S211 determines, based on the deviation data of the data interaction between the communication service type and other communication service types in the associated communication devices, an associated communication device in which there is a deviation in the data interaction type between the communication service type and other communication service types, and enters step S212. When there is no associated communication device in which there is a deviation in the data interaction type, it is determined that the communication service type does not need to adopt the preset verification strategy.
[0095] S212 regards the associated communication devices with deviations in data interaction as deviation communication devices. When the number of the deviation communication devices is greater than the preset deviation number threshold, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy. When the number of the deviation communication devices is not greater than the preset deviation number threshold, proceed to step S22.
[0096] Optionally, the above step S22 includes steps S221-S223, specifically:
[0097] S221 determines the deviation quantity of the deviation interaction type of different deviation communication devices according to the deviation situation of the data interaction type of different deviation communication devices, and when the total deviation quantity of the deviation interaction type does not meet the requirement, proceeds to step S222; when the total deviation quantity of the deviation interaction type meets the requirement, proceeds to step S223;
[0098] S222 when the number of communication devices is within the preset number of deviation devices interval, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy, when the number of communication devices is not within the preset number of deviation devices interval, proceeds to step S223;
[0099] S223 uses the deviation number of the deviation interaction type to determine the interaction deviation coefficients of different deviation communication devices. When the number of deviation communication devices whose interaction deviation coefficients do not meet the requirements does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy. When the number of deviation communication devices whose interaction deviation coefficients do not meet the requirements meets the requirements, proceed to step S23.
[0100] Further, such as Figure 3 As shown, the method for determining the commonly used data volume interval within the processing data volume interval is:
[0101] Determine the historical operation time of the communication service type in the processing data volume interval based on the historical operation data of the communication service type in different processing data volume intervals;
[0102] An operation frequency coefficient of the communication service type within the processing data volume interval is determined based on the historical operation time, and whether the processing data volume interval is a common data volume interval is determined according to the operation frequency coefficient.
[0103] It can be understood that the operation frequency coefficient is determined according to the proportion of the historical operation duration to the historical operation duration in the communication service type.
[0104] Specifically, Figure 4 As shown, the method for determining the verification strategy of the communication service type is:
[0105] Based on the verification deviation data of the data interaction with other communication service types, determine the data interaction type with other communication service types that deviates in the common data volume range, and use it as the deviation interaction type;
[0106] Determine the interaction deviation coefficients of different deviation interaction types according to the weights of the operation frequency coefficients of the commonly used data volume intervals corresponding to different deviation interaction types;
[0107] The comprehensive interaction deviation coefficient is determined by using the interaction deviation coefficients of different deviation interaction types, and the verification strategy of the communication service type is determined based on the comprehensive interaction deviation coefficient.
[0108] Furthermore, the comprehensive interaction deviation coefficient is determined according to the weighted sum of interaction deviation coefficients of different deviation interaction types.
[0109] It can be understood that determining the verification strategy of the communication service type based on the comprehensive interaction deviation coefficient specifically includes:
[0110] Based on the comprehensive interaction deviation coefficient, a set verification strategy corresponding to the comprehensive interaction deviation coefficient is determined, and the preset verification strategy is used to determine the verification strategy of the communication service type.
[0111] Furthermore, the verification strategy includes verifying the associated communication devices under the communication service type based on all data volume intervals, and verifying the associated communication devices under the communication service type based on commonly used data volume intervals.
[0112] Optionally, the method for determining the verification strategy of the communication service type is:
[0113] Based on the verification deviation data of the data interaction with other communication service types, determine the data interaction type with other communication service types that deviates in the commonly used data volume range, and use it as the deviation interaction type; when the number of the deviation interaction type does not meet the requirement, determine the verification strategy of the communication service type based on the preset verification strategy;
[0114] When the number of the deviation interaction types meets the requirement:
[0115] Determine the deviation-associated interaction devices using the associated interaction devices corresponding to different deviation interaction types, and when the number of the deviation-associated interaction devices is greater than a preset deviation device number threshold: determine the verification strategy of the communication service type based on a preset verification strategy;
[0116] When the number of the deviation-associated interaction devices is not greater than the preset deviation device number threshold:
[0117] Determine the interaction deviation coefficients of different deviation interaction types according to the weights of the operation frequency coefficients of the commonly used data volume intervals corresponding to different deviation interaction types, and when the number of deviation interaction types whose interaction deviation coefficients are greater than the preset interaction deviation coefficient threshold does not meet the requirements, determine the verification strategy of the communication service type based on the preset verification strategy;
[0118] When the number of deviation interaction types whose interaction deviation coefficient is greater than the preset interaction deviation coefficient threshold meets the requirement:
[0119] Determine the device deviation coefficients of different deviation-associated interaction devices by using the interaction deviation coefficients of the deviation interaction types corresponding to different deviation-associated interaction devices, and when there is an associated interaction device whose device deviation coefficient does not meet the requirements, determine the verification strategy of the communication service type based on the preset verification strategy;
[0120] When there is no associated interactive device whose device deviation coefficient does not meet the requirements:
[0121] The comprehensive interaction deviation coefficient is determined by using the device deviation coefficients of different associated interaction devices, and the verification strategy of the communication service type is determined based on the comprehensive interaction deviation coefficient.
[0122] Furthermore, the preset verification strategy is to verify the associated communication devices under the communication service type based on all data volume intervals.
[0123] It should also be noted that the verification results obtained by using the verification strategy to conduct compatibility verification of the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment include:
[0124] Based on the verification strategy, compatibility verification is performed on the associated communication devices under the communication service type to obtain a verification result.
[0125] It is understandable that the optimization and construction of the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment based on the verification results specifically includes:
[0126] Based on the verification results, the communication equipment with compatibility problems in the domestically produced, independently controllable environment is determined, and targeted optimization processing is performed on the communication equipment with compatibility problems.
[0127] Embodiment 2 The second aspect, as Figure 5 As shown, the present invention provides a computer system, comprising: a memory and a processor that are communicatively connected, and a computer program stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor, wherein the processor executes the above-mentioned method for constructing a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment when running the computer program.
[0128] Each embodiment in this specification is described in a progressive manner, and the same or similar parts between the embodiments can be referred to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from other embodiments. In particular, for the device, equipment, and non-volatile computer storage medium embodiments, since they are basically similar to the method embodiments, the description is relatively simple, and the relevant parts can be referred to the partial description of the method embodiment.
[0129] The above is a description of a specific embodiment of the specification. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recorded in the claims can be performed in an order different from that in the embodiments and still achieve the desired results. In addition, the processes depicted in the drawings do not necessarily require the specific order or continuous order shown to achieve the desired results. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.
[0130] The above description is only one or more embodiments of this specification and is not intended to limit this specification. For those skilled in the art, one or more embodiments of this specification may have various changes and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of one or more embodiments of this specification shall be included in the scope of the claims of this specification.
Claims
1. A method for constructing a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment, characterized in that: Specifically include: Determine an associated communication device of a communication service type, and proceed to the next step when it is determined that the communication service type does not need to adopt a preset verification strategy based on data interaction of the associated communication device in the communication service type; When it is determined that the communication service type does not need to adopt a preset verification strategy by using the deviation data of the data interaction between the communication service type and other communication service types in the associated communication device, proceed to the next step; Based on the historical operation data of the communication service type in different processing data volume intervals, determining the commonly used data volume interval and the operation frequency coefficient in the processing data volume interval; The verification deviation data of the data interaction situation with other communication service types is determined based on the data interaction situation and the commonly used data volume interval, and the verification strategy of the communication service type is determined in combination with the operation frequency coefficient of different commonly used data volume intervals. The verification strategy is used to perform compatibility verification processing of the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment to obtain a verification result, and the optimization construction processing of the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment is performed based on the verification result.
2. The method for constructing a localized autonomous controllable environment as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The associated communication device of the communication service type is determined according to the communication devices involved in the operation of the communication service type.
3. The method for constructing a localized autonomous controllable environment as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The data interaction situation includes the data interaction type between associated communication devices in the communication service type.
4. The method for constructing a localized autonomous controllable environment as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: Determining that the communication service type does not require the use of a preset verification strategy specifically includes: Determining data interaction types of different associated communication devices in the communication service type according to data interaction conditions of the associated communication devices in the communication service type; Determine, based on the data interaction type, the number of associated communication devices with which data interaction exists in the communication service type; Whether the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy is determined according to the number of associated communication devices with which data interaction exists.
5. The method for constructing a localized autonomous controllable environment as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that: When the number of associated communication devices with data interaction is greater than the preset number of communication devices, it is determined that the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy.
6. The method for constructing a localized autonomous controllable environment according to claim 1, characterized in that: The deviation data of the data interaction situation of the associated communication devices includes associated communication devices whose data interaction types deviate from those of other communication service types.
7. The method for constructing a localized autonomous controllable environment as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: Determining that the communication service type does not require the use of a preset verification strategy specifically includes: Based on the deviation data of the data interaction between the communication service type and other communication service types in the associated communication device, determine the associated communication device in which the data interaction type between the communication service type and other communication service types deviates, and use it as the deviation communication device; Whether the communication service type needs to adopt a preset verification strategy is determined according to the number of deviation communication devices.
8. The method for constructing a localized autonomous controllable environment as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The verification strategy is used to perform compatibility verification of the domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment to obtain verification results, including: Based on the verification strategy, compatibility verification is performed on the associated communication devices under the communication service type to obtain a verification result.
9. The method for constructing a localized autonomous controllable environment as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: Based on the verification results, the optimization construction of the domestically produced independent and controllable environment is carried out, which specifically includes: Based on the verification results, the communication equipment with compatibility problems in the domestically produced, independently controllable environment is determined, and targeted optimization processing is performed on the communication equipment with compatibility problems.
10. A computer system comprising: A memory and a processor connected in communication, and a computer program stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor, characterized in that: when the processor runs the computer program, a method for constructing a domestically produced autonomous and controllable environment as described in any one of claims 1-9 is executed.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Simulation test method for simulating domestic production environment
CN117130942A
Automatic network performance test method based on domestic operating system
CN112583663A
Full-scene GSM-R interface server test platform system
CN113704089A