Power grid operation risk management and control method, device and equipment and storage medium
By calculating the average risk values of the job tasks and sorting them, the target job tasks are selected for risk control, which solves the problem that it is difficult to uniformly evaluate and control the same type of job risks, and realizes effective management of job risks and efficient utilization of resources.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411555965.7
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-11-04
- Publication Date
- 2025-02-07
AI Technical Summary
The same type of operation risk types are often difficult to obtain a unified operation risk value, resulting in the inability to take effective control measures according to priorities, and it is difficult to avoid weakening of control focus and waste of resource sharing.
By obtaining the operation risk assessment data of all workers, calculate the average value of risk consequences, exposure and possibility of each operation task, generate a unified operation risk value, and sort it from large to small according to the risk value, select the target operation task for risk. Control.
The integration of operation risk assessment data of different operators has been achieved, ensuring the consistency of risk assessment results in the same operation task, so that control measures can be taken effectively according to priorities, and the unified management of operation risks and efficient utilization of resources can be improved.
Smart Images

Figure CN119398520A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of power grid operation control, and in particular to a power grid operation risk control method, device, equipment and storage medium. Background Art
[0002] Operation risk assessment and control is a core component of the safety production risk management system and an important support for ensuring operation safety. Since October 2007, China Southern Power Grid has established a long-term mechanism for operation risk assessment and control, and has formulated a unified operation risk assessment method. Each work team must conduct an operation risk assessment in advance before each operation task begins, and take corresponding control measures based on the operation risk assessment results, so as to effectively prevent operation risks.
[0003] Since power grid operation tasks involve a wide variety of types, the types of risks involved in the operation tasks are varied. For example, a power supply bureau's risk assessment results for the "500kV oil-immersed power transformer preventive test" operation task include but are not limited to the following 10 types of risks: electric shock, blow, local power outage, sprain, equipment damage, equipment burns, equipment fatigue damage, tripping, falling, and power supply with a grounding knife or grounding wire.
[0004] At the same time, it is necessary to evaluate and determine the values of multiple parameters such as consequences, exposure, possibility, etc. of each "risk type" of operational risk in turn before calculating the baseline value of the corresponding risk. In practice, the evaluation of multiple parameters such as consequences, exposure, possibility, etc. involves many types of work, a large number of people, and uneven personnel quality. For the same type of "risk type", different consequences, exposures, possibilities (values) are often evaluated, and the calculated risk values are inconsistent. For the same type of operational risk type, it is often difficult to obtain a unified operational risk value, resulting in the inability to take effective control measures according to the degree of priority, and it is difficult to avoid the weakening of control priorities and the waste of resource distribution, which will be detrimental to the effective control of operational risks. Summary of the invention
[0005] The present invention provides a power grid operation risk management method, device, equipment and storage medium to solve the technical problem that it is often difficult to obtain a unified operation risk value for the same type of operation risk, resulting in the inability to take effective management and control measures according to the degree of urgency.
[0006] In order to solve the above technical problems, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for risk management and control of power grid operations, including:
[0007] Obtain the job risk values of all current job tasks, and sort the job risk values of each job task in descending order;
[0008] Obtain the current number of controllable tasks, and select the same number of tasks as the controllable tasks as the target tasks in descending order of the operation risk value of each operation task;
[0009] According to the risk type of each target operation task, matching the operation risk control plan corresponding to each target operation task, and then performing risk control on each target operation task according to the operation risk control plan;
[0010] The generation of the risk value includes:
[0011] Obtaining the operational risk assessment data of all operators; wherein the operational risk assessment data includes: the name of the operational task, operational hazards, risk type, risk consequence, risk exposure and risk possibility corresponding to each operational task;
[0012] For the same operation task, the risk consequences in the operation assessment data are averaged to obtain the corresponding risk consequence mean, the risk exposure in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk exposure mean, the risk possibility in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk possibility mean, and the risk value corresponding to the operation task is calculated based on the risk consequence mean, risk exposure mean and risk possibility mean.
[0013] As a preferred solution, it also includes:
[0014] According to the risk value of each work task and the preset risk level classification range, the risk level corresponding to each work task is obtained; wherein the risk level includes: acceptable risk level, low risk level, medium risk level, high risk level and extremely high risk level.
[0015] As a preferred solution, the risk types include: electric shock, falling, power transmission with grounding wire, and poisoning in a confined space;
[0016] According to the operation risk control plan, risk control is performed on each target operation task, including:
[0017] According to the operation risk control plan, anti-electric shock control is carried out for target operation tasks with risk type of electric shock, anti-falling control is carried out for target operation tasks with risk type of falling, anti-power transmission with grounding wire is carried out for target operation tasks with risk type of power transmission with grounding wire, and gas content detection control is carried out for target operation tasks with risk type of poisoning in confined space.
[0018] As a preferred solution, the anti-electric shock control for the target operation task with the risk type of electric shock includes:
[0019] For target work tasks with the risk type of electric shock, the voltage signal of the three-phase wire at the work site is obtained through a preset voltage sensor probe, and whether the three-phase wire is energized is determined based on the voltage signal, and a corresponding alarm signal is generated when it is determined that the three-phase wire is energized.
[0020] As a preferred solution, the anti-falling control for the target operation task with the risk type of falling includes:
[0021] For target work tasks with the risk type of falling, the safety belts of the workers at the work site are safety checked to determine whether the hooks on the safety belts are in an effective fastening state, and a corresponding alarm signal is generated when it is determined that the hooks on the safety belts are not in an effective fastening state.
[0022] As a preferred solution, the control of preventing power transmission with ground wire for the target operation task with risk type of power transmission with ground wire includes:
[0023] For target operation tasks with risk type of power transmission with grounding wire, the loop resistance value of the power line at the operation site is detected and compared with a preset threshold value. When it is detected that the loop resistance value is less than the preset threshold value, a corresponding alarm signal is generated.
[0024] As a preferred solution, the gas content detection and control of the target operation task with the risk type of confined space poisoning includes:
[0025] For target work tasks with the risk type of poisoning in a confined space, the gas concentration of harmful gases in the confined space at the work site is detected respectively, and the detected gas concentration is compared with a preset gas concentration threshold. When the gas concentration is greater than the gas concentration threshold, a corresponding alarm signal is generated.
[0026] Based on the above embodiment, another embodiment of the present invention provides a power grid operation risk management and control device, including: an operation risk value acquisition module, a target operation task selection module and an operation risk management and control module;
[0027] The operation risk value acquisition module is used to obtain the operation risk values of all current operation tasks, and sort the operation risk values of each operation task in order from large to small; wherein, the generation of the risk value includes: obtaining the operation risk assessment data of all operators; wherein, the operation risk assessment data includes: the operation task name, operation hazard, risk type, risk consequence, risk exposure and risk possibility corresponding to each operation task; for the same operation task, the risk consequences in the operation assessment data are averaged to obtain the corresponding risk consequence mean, the risk exposure in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk exposure mean, the risk possibility in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk possibility mean, and the risk value corresponding to the operation task is calculated based on the risk consequence mean, the risk exposure mean and the risk possibility mean;
[0028] The target task selection module is used to obtain the current number of controllable tasks, and select the same number of tasks as the controllable tasks as the target tasks in descending order of the risk value of each task;
[0029] The operation risk management module is used to match the operation risk management plan corresponding to each target operation task according to the risk type of each target operation task, and then perform risk management on each target operation task according to the operation risk management plan.
[0030] Based on the above embodiments, another embodiment of the present invention provides an electronic device, which includes a processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the processor, and when the processor executes the computer program, the power grid operation risk management method described in the above invention embodiments is implemented.
[0031] Based on the above embodiments, another embodiment of the present invention provides a storage medium, which includes a stored computer program, wherein when the computer program is running, the device where the storage medium is located is controlled to execute the power grid operation risk management method described in the above invention embodiment.
[0032] Compared with the prior art, the embodiments of the present invention have the following beneficial effects:
[0033] The present invention provides a method for controlling the operation risk of a power grid, which obtains the operation risk values of all current operation tasks, and sorts the operation risk values of each operation task in descending order; obtains the current number of controllable tasks, and selects the same number of operation tasks as the number of controllable tasks as target operation tasks according to the operation risk values of each operation task in descending order; matches the operation risk control plan corresponding to each target operation task according to the risk type of each target operation task, and then performs risk control on each target operation task according to the operation risk control plan.
[0034] Wherein, the generation of the risk value includes: obtaining the operation risk assessment data of all operators; wherein, the operation risk assessment data includes: the operation task name, operation hazard, risk type, risk consequence, risk exposure and risk possibility corresponding to each operation task; for the same operation task, the risk consequences in the operation assessment data are averaged to obtain the corresponding risk consequence mean, the risk exposure in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk exposure mean, the risk possibility in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk possibility mean, and the risk value corresponding to the operation task is calculated based on the risk consequence mean, the risk exposure mean and the risk possibility mean.
[0035] Through the present invention, the operation risk assessment data of different operators can be integrated, and the risk consequences, risk exposure and risk possibility in the same operation task can be averaged to obtain a unified risk consequence average, risk exposure average and risk possibility average for the operation task, and then a unique risk value can be calculated based on the unified risk consequence average, risk exposure average and risk possibility average. Then, when performing the operation, the operation risk values of all current operation tasks can be sorted, and the same number of operation tasks as the number of controllable tasks can be selected as the target operation tasks, and the target operation tasks can be risk controlled, thereby achieving effective control of operation risks. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0036] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of a method for risk management and control of power grid operations provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
[0037] Figure 2 It is a structural schematic diagram of a power grid operation risk management device provided by an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0038] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of this application clearer, the technical solutions in this application will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of this application. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of this application, not all of them. Based on the embodiments in this application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of this application.
[0039] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by technicians in the technical field to which this application belongs; the terms used herein are only for the purpose of describing specific embodiments and are not intended to limit this application; the terms "including" and "having" in the specification and claims of this application and the above-mentioned figure descriptions and any variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions.
[0040] In the description of the embodiments of the present application, the technical terms "first", "second", etc. are only used to distinguish different objects, and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number, specific order or primary and secondary relationship of the indicated technical features. In the description of the embodiments of the present application, the meaning of "multiple" is more than two, unless otherwise clearly and specifically defined.
[0041] Reference to "embodiments" herein means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in conjunction with the embodiments may be included in at least one embodiment of the present application. The appearance of the phrase in various locations in the specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, nor is it an independent or alternative embodiment that is mutually exclusive with other embodiments. It is explicitly and implicitly understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments described herein may be combined with other embodiments.
[0042] In the description of the embodiments of the present application, the term "and / or" is only a description of the association relationship of the associated objects, indicating that there may be three relationships. For example, A and / or B can represent: A exists alone, A and B exist at the same time, and B exists alone. In addition, the character " / " in this article generally indicates that the associated objects before and after are in an "or" relationship.
[0043] In the description of the embodiments of the present application, the term "multiple" refers to more than two (including two). Similarly, "multiple groups" refers to more than two groups (including two groups), and "multiple pieces" refers to more than two pieces (including two pieces).
[0044] In the description of the embodiments of the present application, unless otherwise clearly specified and limited, technical terms such as "installed", "connected", "connected", "fixed" and the like should be understood in a broad sense. For example, it can be a fixed connection, a detachable connection, or an integral connection; it can be a mechanical connection or an electrical connection; it can be a direct connection or an indirect connection through an intermediate medium, and it can be the internal connection of two elements or the interaction relationship between two elements. For those of ordinary skill in the art, the specific meanings of the above terms in the embodiments of the present application can be understood according to the specific circumstances.
[0045] Embodiment 1
[0046] Please refer to Figure 1 , is a flow chart of a method for risk management and control of power grid operations provided by an embodiment of the present invention, comprising the following specific steps:
[0047] S1. Obtain the operation risk values of all current operation tasks, and sort the operation risk values of each operation task in descending order;
[0048] The generation of the risk value includes:
[0049] Obtaining the operational risk assessment data of all operators; wherein the operational risk assessment data includes: the name of the operational task, operational hazards, risk type, risk consequence, risk exposure and risk possibility corresponding to each operational task;
[0050] For the same operation task, the risk consequences in the operation assessment data are averaged to obtain the corresponding risk consequence mean, the risk exposure in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk exposure mean, the risk possibility in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk possibility mean, and the risk value corresponding to the operation task is calculated based on the risk consequence mean, risk exposure mean and risk possibility mean.
[0051] Preferably, it also includes: obtaining the risk level corresponding to each work task according to the risk value of each work task and the preset risk level division range; wherein the risk level includes: acceptable risk level, low risk level, medium risk level, high risk level and extremely high risk level.
[0052] Specifically, the present invention provides an operation risk management method. Aiming at the problem that the operation risk values and risk levels assessed by various power supply bureaus for the same type of operation risk are inconsistent, which is not conducive to the effective management and control of operation risks, firstly, the risk consequences, risk exposure, risk possibility and other data that affect the risk level results are optimized and integrated into coordinated and unified values; then, the risk values and risk levels of "similar risk types in similar operation tasks" of various power supply bureaus are coordinated and unified, and the management and control measures of each risk type are associated; finally, when performing operations, the risk values of the current operation tasks are matched and sorted, and the operation tasks with higher risk values are selected to match the management and control schemes of the corresponding risk types, so as to achieve effective management and control of operation risks, which specifically includes the following steps:
[0053] 1. Generation of Risk Value
[0054] 1. Obtain the operational risk assessment data of all operators:
[0055] Since October 2007, China Southern Power Grid has been promoting and applying the operation risk management system. The operation tasks involved are of various types and have accumulated a large amount of operation risk assessment data. These data are based on the operation risk management system. The operators conduct risk assessments on each operation task based on their subjective cognition, assess the risk level, and select risk control measures for management and control. Among them, the operation risk assessment data of similar operation tasks within the same team are integrated and consistent; moreover, some power supply bureaus also integrate and make consistent the operation risk assessment data. Among them, these operation risk assessment data are basically directly output by the human brain based on the subjective cognition of the operators, and everyone's assessment results are different.
[0056] For example, in the test type of substation, "500kV oil-immersed power transformer preventive test" is a common operation task, and the parameters involved in its risk assessment data are mainly: operation task, hazard name, risk type, risk consequence, risk exposure, risk possibility, risk value, risk level, "recommended control measures", etc. The single parameter of "risk type" includes (but not limited to): electric shock, blow, partial power outage, sprain, equipment damage, equipment burn, equipment fatigue damage, trip, fall, power supply with grounding knife or grounding wire, etc. The risk values of these "risk types" are all obtained by the operators based on subjective cognitive assessment. The assessment work involves many people and is complicated, resulting in inconsistent risk assessment results for the same "risk type". Please refer to the following Table 1, taking the operation task of "500kV oil-immersed power transformer preventive test" as an example for data display, where risk value = consequence × exposure × possibility.
[0057]
[0058] Table 1 Risk data of 500kV oil-fired transformer pre-test operation
[0059] 2. Use the mean calculation method to assess the risk value of the operation
[0060] In view of the large discreteness of the risk values assessed for the same risk type in the above-mentioned risk assessment data, an "average" algorithm is adopted for optimization and integration. For the same work task, the risk consequences in the work assessment data are averaged to obtain the corresponding risk consequence average, the risk exposure in the work assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk exposure average, the risk possibility in the work assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk possibility average, and the risk value corresponding to the work task is calculated based on the risk consequence average, the risk exposure average and the risk possibility average, so that they are basically coordinated and unified, and a relatively unified risk value is obtained, thereby eliminating the inconsistency problem caused by the large number of work risk assessors and their uneven quality, and thereby improving the coordination of risk control measures for similar work tasks and the effectiveness of on-site work risk control.
[0061] For example, the geometric mean calculation method is used to calculate the risk data of the 500kV oil-fired transformer pre-test operation in Table 1:
[0062]
[0063] Similarly, we can get:
[0064]
[0065] so:
[0066] Similarly, using the same mean calculation method, other "risk types" in the task (strike, local power outage, sprain, equipment damage, equipment burn, equipment fatigue damage, tripping, falling, power supply with grounding knife or grounding wire, etc.) can be calculated to obtain relatively uniform risk values for other "risk types".
[0067] Please refer to Table 2 for the mean calculation results of the risk data of the 500kV oil-fired transformer pre-test operation.
[0068]
[0069] Table 2 Mean calculation results of 500kV oil-fired transformer pre-test operation risk data
[0070] In addition, the risk level corresponding to each operation task can be obtained according to the risk value of each operation task and the preset risk level classification range; wherein the risk level includes: acceptable risk level, low risk level, medium risk level, high risk level and extremely high risk level. In a specific embodiment, please refer to the following Table 3 for the classification range of operation risk levels.
[0071]
[0072] Table 3 Scope of classification of operation risk levels
[0073] II. Operational Risk Control
[0074] 1. Risk value acquisition:
[0075] After calculating a unified risk value and risk level for each operation task, the risk value and risk level are associated with the corresponding operation task and stored in a database. Then, before performing on-site operations, the operation risk values of all current operation tasks are first obtained from the database, and the operation risk values of each operation task are sorted in descending order.
[0076] S2. Obtain the current number of controllable tasks, and select the same number of tasks as the controllable tasks as target tasks in descending order of the operation risk value of each operation task;
[0077] 2. Task selection:
[0078] Each risk type of work task has a unified risk value. The system automatically sorts them according to the size of the risk value, and then selects the part of work tasks starting with the highest risk value from these risk value lists as target work tasks for control. The number of controllable tasks can be obtained based on the actual control requirements of the work site (such as the workload of 2-person control or 4-person control).
[0079] S3, matching the operation risk control plan corresponding to each target operation task according to the risk type of each target operation task, and then performing risk control on each target operation task according to the operation risk control plan;
[0080] Preferably, the risk types include: electric shock, falling, power supply with grounding wire and poisoning in confined space; according to the operation risk control plan, risk control is performed on each target operation task, including: according to the operation risk control plan, anti-electric shock control is performed on the target operation task with the risk type of electric shock, anti-falling control is performed on the target operation task with the risk type of falling, anti-power supply with grounding wire is performed on the target operation task with the risk type of power supply with grounding wire, and gas content detection control is performed on the target operation task with the risk type of poisoning in confined space.
[0081] Preferably, the anti-electric shock control for the target work task with the risk type of electric shock includes: for the target work task with the risk type of electric shock, obtaining the voltage signal of the three-phase wire at the work site through a preset voltage sensor probe, judging whether the three-phase wire is energized according to the voltage signal, and generating a corresponding alarm signal when it is determined that the three-phase wire is energized.
[0082] Preferably, the anti-fall control for target work tasks with a risk type of falling includes: for target work tasks with a risk type of falling, performing safety checks on the safety belts of workers at the work site, determining whether the hooks on the safety belts are in an effective fastening state, and generating a corresponding alarm signal when it is determined that the hooks on the safety belts are not in an effective fastening state.
[0083] Preferably, the prevention of power transmission with a ground wire is controlled for the target operation task whose risk type is power transmission with a ground wire, including: for the target operation task whose risk type is power transmission with a ground wire, the loop resistance value of the power line at the operation site is detected, and the loop resistance value is compared with a preset threshold value, and when it is detected that the loop resistance value is less than the preset threshold value, a corresponding alarm signal is generated.
[0084] Preferably, the gas content detection and control for the target work task with the risk type of confined space poisoning includes: for the target work task with the risk type of confined space poisoning, the gas concentration of the harmful gas in the confined space of the work site is detected respectively, and the detected gas concentration is compared with a preset gas concentration threshold, and when the gas concentration is greater than the gas concentration threshold, a corresponding alarm signal is generated.
[0085] 3. Operational risk management and control plan matching:
[0086] According to the risk type of each target operation task, the operation risk management plan corresponding to each target operation task is matched, and then the risk of each target operation task is controlled according to the operation risk management plan.
[0087] In a specific embodiment, the risk types include electric shock, falling, power transmission with grounding wires, and poisoning in confined spaces. The operation risk control schemes corresponding to these risk types are as follows:
[0088] (1) Conduct anti-electric shock control for target operations with risk types of electric shock, detect nearby live conditions, and issue relevant warning signals. First, install the electric test device on the high-voltage conductor part of the operating equipment. The card reader can wirelessly read whether the high-voltage conductor part is live to guide the anti-electric shock work during the operation. Specifically, by arranging three "source-sensing integrated" voltage sensor probes, the voltage signals of the three phases A, B, and C can be collected at any time, and the collected results can be analyzed and calculated to determine whether the (three-phase) conductor is live, thereby effectively avoiding the situation where the single-phase voltage passes through zero or near zero (lower than the "live threshold") and causes misjudgment, and realizes the full-condition, non-contact, and effective voltage collection (electricity test) of the conductor with passive collection and passive wireless transmission, further preventing personal electric shock and ensuring personal safety.
[0089] (2) Carry out fall prevention control for target work tasks with the risk type of falling, detect whether the safety belt is effectively fastened, and issue relevant warning signals. Carry out safety inspections on the safety belts of workers at the work site, and install an alarm circuit with a grating on the hook of the safety belt. When the hook of the safety belt is effectively fastened, the hook will block the light and no alarm signal will be issued; when there is no hook blocking the light, an alarm signal will be issued. Specifically, a (small and low-energy) photoelectric switch is installed at one end of the hook ring, and a light-absorbing material is coated on the inner wall of the other end of the hook ring to change the boundary conditions. When there is no object in the hook ring, the light directly irradiates the light-absorbing material, and the photoelectric switch cannot detect the reflected light; when there is an object in the hook ring, the light irradiates the object, and the photoelectric switch detects the reflected light.
[0090] (3) For the target operation task with the risk type of power transmission with grounding wire, control is carried out to prevent power transmission with grounding wire, detect whether there are unremoved grounding wires or grounding knives on the line before power transmission, and issue relevant warning signals. Measure the loop resistance value connecting "line conductor, the last (known) grounding wire and the earth". When the loop resistance value is close to infinity (the loop is open), there are no other unknown grounding wires left on the line, and the device does not issue an alarm signal; when the loop resistance value is less than the preset value (the loop is open or closed), there are other unknown grounding wires left on the line, and the device issues an alarm signal. Specifically, two clamp meters with different measurement frequencies are clamped on any group of grounding wires or the grounding lead of the line grounding knife at the same time, and the total impedance Z1 (measurement result reading of clamp meter 1) and Z2 (measurement result reading of clamp meter 2) of the power line are measured respectively, and the resistance R and reactance X of the line are calculated, and then the influence of reactance X is eliminated, and then the resistance R is effectively detected to sense whether there is a closed loop in the line, so as to accurately judge whether the remaining grounding wires of the power line are removed.
[0091] (4) For target tasks with the risk of poisoning in confined spaces, gas content detection and control are carried out to detect the gas content in the air in confined spaces such as cable tunnels and indoor GIS rooms, and issue relevant alarm signals. A four-in-one gas detector can be used in confined spaces such as cable tunnels and indoor GIS rooms to detect the concentration of oxygen, combustible gas, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen sulfide in the air. When the measured gas reaches the preset alarm, an audible and visual alarm will be automatically issued.
[0092] Embodiment 2
[0093] Please refer to Figure 2 , is a schematic diagram of the structure of a power grid operation risk management and control device provided by an embodiment of the present invention, the device comprising: an operation risk value acquisition module, a target operation task selection module and an operation risk management and control module;
[0094] The operation risk value acquisition module is used to obtain the operation risk values of all current operation tasks, and sort the operation risk values of each operation task in order from large to small; wherein, the generation of the risk value includes: obtaining the operation risk assessment data of all operators; wherein, the operation risk assessment data includes: the operation task name, operation hazard, risk type, risk consequence, risk exposure and risk possibility corresponding to each operation task; for the same operation task, the risk consequences in the operation assessment data are averaged to obtain the corresponding risk consequence mean, the risk exposure in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk exposure mean, the risk possibility in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk possibility mean, and the risk value corresponding to the operation task is calculated based on the risk consequence mean, the risk exposure mean and the risk possibility mean;
[0095] The target task selection module is used to obtain the current number of controllable tasks, and select the same number of tasks as the controllable tasks as the target tasks in descending order of the risk value of each task;
[0096] The operation risk management module is used to match the operation risk management plan corresponding to each target operation task according to the risk type of each target operation task, and then perform risk management on each target operation task according to the operation risk management plan.
[0097] It should be noted that the device embodiments described above are merely schematic, wherein the units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components displayed as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place, or they may be distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the modules may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the scheme of this embodiment. In addition, in the accompanying drawings of the device embodiments provided by the present invention, the connection relationship between the modules indicates that there is a communication connection between them, which may be specifically implemented as one or more communication buses or signal lines. A person of ordinary skill in the art may understand and implement it without paying any creative effort.
[0098] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the specific working process of the device described above can refer to the corresponding process in the aforementioned method embodiment, and will not be repeated here.
[0099] Embodiment 3
[0100] Accordingly, an embodiment of the present invention provides an electronic device, comprising a processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the processor, wherein the processor implements the power grid operation risk management method described in the above-mentioned embodiment of the invention when executing the computer program.
[0101] The electronic device may be a computing device such as a desktop computer, a notebook, a palm computer, a cloud server, etc. The device may include, but is not limited to, a processor and a memory.
[0102] The processor may be a central processing unit (CPU), other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSP), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. A general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor or any conventional processor, etc. The processor is the control center of the device, and various interfaces and lines are used to connect various parts of the entire device.
[0103] Embodiment 4
[0104] Accordingly, an embodiment of the present invention provides a storage medium, which includes a stored computer program, wherein when the computer program is running, the device where the storage medium is located is controlled to execute the power grid operation risk management method described in the above-mentioned embodiment of the invention.
[0105] The memory can be used to store the computer program, and the processor realizes various functions of the device by running or executing the computer program stored in the memory and calling the data stored in the memory. The memory can mainly include a program storage area and a data storage area, wherein the program storage area can store an operating system, at least one application required for a function, etc.; the data storage area can store data created according to the use of the mobile phone, etc. In addition, the memory can include a high-speed random access memory, and can also include a non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk, a memory, a plug-in hard disk, a smart memory card (Smart Media Card, SMC), a secure digital (Secure Digital, SD) card, a flash card (FlashCard), at least one disk storage device, a flash memory device, or other volatile solid-state storage devices.
[0106] The storage medium is a computer-readable storage medium, and the computer program is stored in the computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps of each method embodiment described above can be implemented. Among them, the computer program includes computer program code, and the computer program code can be in source code form, object code form, executable file or some intermediate form, etc. The computer-readable medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program code, recording medium, USB flash drive, mobile hard disk, disk, optical disk, computer memory, read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), electric carrier signal, telecommunication signal and software distribution medium, etc. It should be noted that the content contained in the computer-readable medium can be appropriately increased or decreased according to the requirements of legislation and patent practice in the jurisdiction. For example, in some jurisdictions, according to legislation and patent practice, computer-readable media do not include electric carrier signals and telecommunication signals.
[0107] The above is a preferred embodiment of the present invention. It should be pointed out that a person skilled in the art can make several improvements and modifications without departing from the principle of the present invention. These improvements and modifications are also considered to be within the scope of protection of the present invention.
Claims
1. A method for risk management and control of power grid operations, characterized in that: include: Obtain the job risk values of all current job tasks, and sort the job risk values of each job task in descending order; Obtain the current number of controllable tasks, and select the same number of tasks as the controllable tasks as the target tasks in descending order of the operation risk value of each operation task; According to the risk type of each target operation task, matching the operation risk control plan corresponding to each target operation task, and then performing risk control on each target operation task according to the operation risk control plan; The generation of the risk value includes: Obtaining the operational risk assessment data of all operators; wherein the operational risk assessment data includes: the name of the operational task, operational hazards, risk type, risk consequence, risk exposure and risk possibility corresponding to each operational task; For the same operation task, the risk consequences in the operation assessment data are averaged to obtain the corresponding risk consequence mean, the risk exposure in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk exposure mean, the risk possibility in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk possibility mean, and the risk value corresponding to the operation task is calculated based on the risk consequence mean, risk exposure mean and risk possibility mean.
2. The power grid operation risk management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: According to the risk value of each work task and the preset risk level classification range, the risk level corresponding to each work task is obtained; wherein the risk level includes: acceptable risk level, low risk level, medium risk level, high risk level and extremely high risk level.
3. The power grid operation risk management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The types of risks described include: electric shock, falling, power transmission with grounding wires, and poisoning in confined spaces; According to the operation risk control plan, risk control is performed on each target operation task, including: According to the operation risk control plan, anti-electric shock control is carried out for target operation tasks with risk type of electric shock, anti-falling control is carried out for target operation tasks with risk type of falling, anti-power transmission with grounding wire is carried out for target operation tasks with risk type of power transmission with grounding wire, and gas content detection control is carried out for target operation tasks with risk type of poisoning in confined space.
4. The method for controlling the risk of power grid operations according to claim 3, characterized in that: The anti-electric shock control for the target operation task with the risk type of electric shock includes: For target work tasks with the risk type of electric shock, the voltage signal of the three-phase wire at the work site is obtained through a preset voltage sensor probe, and whether the three-phase wire is energized is determined based on the voltage signal, and a corresponding alarm signal is generated when it is determined that the three-phase wire is energized.
5. The power grid operation risk management method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The anti-fall control for the target operation task with the risk type of falling includes: For target work tasks with the risk type of falling, the safety belts of the workers at the work site are safety checked to determine whether the hooks on the safety belts are in an effective fastening state, and a corresponding alarm signal is generated when it is determined that the hooks on the safety belts are not in an effective fastening state.
6. The method for controlling the risk of power grid operations according to claim 3, characterized in that: The control of preventing power transmission with ground wire for the target operation task with risk type of power transmission with ground wire includes: For target operation tasks with risk type of power transmission with grounding wire, the loop resistance value of the power line at the operation site is detected and compared with a preset threshold value. When it is detected that the loop resistance value is less than the preset threshold value, a corresponding alarm signal is generated.
7. The method for controlling the risk of power grid operations according to claim 3, characterized in that: The gas content detection and control for the target operation task with the risk type of confined space poisoning includes: For target work tasks with the risk type of poisoning in a confined space, the gas concentration of harmful gases in the confined space at the work site is detected respectively, and the detected gas concentration is compared with a preset gas concentration threshold. When the gas concentration is greater than the gas concentration threshold, a corresponding alarm signal is generated.
8. A power grid operation risk management and control device, characterized in that: include: Operation risk value acquisition module, target operation task selection module and operation risk management module; The operation risk value acquisition module is used to obtain the operation risk values of all current operation tasks, and sort the operation risk values of each operation task in order from large to small; wherein, the generation of the risk value includes: obtaining the operation risk assessment data of all operators; wherein, the operation risk assessment data includes: the operation task name, operation hazard, risk type, risk consequence, risk exposure and risk possibility corresponding to each operation task; for the same operation task, the risk consequences in the operation assessment data are averaged to obtain the corresponding risk consequence mean, the risk exposure in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk exposure mean, the risk possibility in the operation assessment data is averaged to obtain the corresponding risk possibility mean, and the risk value corresponding to the operation task is calculated based on the risk consequence mean, the risk exposure mean and the risk possibility mean; The target task selection module is used to obtain the current number of controllable tasks, and select the same number of tasks as the controllable tasks as the target tasks in descending order of the risk value of each task; The operation risk management module is used to match the operation risk management plan corresponding to each target operation task according to the risk type of each target operation task, and then perform risk management on each target operation task according to the operation risk management plan.
9. An electronic device, characterized in that: The method comprises a processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the processor, wherein when the processor executes the computer program, the method for controlling the risk of power grid operations as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 is implemented.
10. A storage medium, characterized in that: The storage medium includes a stored computer program, wherein when the computer program is running, the device where the storage medium is located is controlled to execute the power grid operation risk management method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.