Review method of architectural drawings, computer device and computer readable storage medium

Abstract

This invention provides a method, computer device, and computer-readable storage medium for reviewing architectural drawings. The method includes the following steps: establishing a rule base comprising one or more normative clauses for reviewing architectural drawings, the normative clauses including constraint rules; importing the architectural drawings to be reviewed and identifying the information in the architectural drawings; retrieving normative clauses containing the content to be reviewed from the rule base according to the content to be reviewed in the architectural drawings; revising the final applicable rules for reviewing the architectural drawings according to the constraint rules of the normative clauses retrieved from the rule base; and comparing the content to be reviewed in the architectural drawings with the final applicable rules to determine whether the content to be reviewed meets the requirements of the final applicable rules. This invention only requires comparing the requirements of the final applicable rules with the content to be reviewed in the architectural drawings, eliminating the need to compare each item to be reviewed with all retrieved clauses, thus reducing the number of comparisons and improving review efficiency.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of building technology, and more specifically to a method for verifying architectural drawings, a computer device, and a computer-readable storage medium. Background Technology

[0002] Currently, the use of computers to review architectural drawings is widely adopted. One existing method for computer-based architectural drawing review involves first storing multiple design standards in a standard library. After extracting information from the drawing to be reviewed, this information is compared one by one with the various design standards in the library to determine if the drawing conforms to them. When the design library contains multiple design standards, this method requires comparing the drawing to be reviewed with each standard separately, resulting in low review efficiency. Summary of the Invention

[0003] The primary objective of this invention is to provide a highly efficient method for verifying architectural drawings.

[0004] A second objective of this invention is to provide a computer device for implementing the above-described method for verifying architectural drawings.

[0005] A third objective of this invention is to provide a computer-readable storage medium for implementing the above-described architectural drawing verification method.

[0006] To achieve the aforementioned first objective, the present invention provides a method for reviewing architectural drawings, comprising the following steps: establishing a rule base, the rule base including two or more normative clauses for reviewing architectural drawings, the normative clauses including constraint rules for reviewing the review items; importing the architectural drawings to be reviewed and identifying the information of the architectural drawings; retrieving, from the rule base, normative clauses containing the content to be reviewed, based on the content to be reviewed in the architectural drawings; re-formulating the final applicable rules for reviewing the architectural drawings based on the constraint rules of the normative clauses retrieved from the rule base; and comparing the content to be reviewed in the architectural drawings with the final applicable rules to determine whether the content to be reviewed meets the requirements of the final applicable rules.

[0007] Therefore, before reviewing architectural drawings, the relevant standard clauses for reviewing architectural drawings should be retrieved from the rule base. Based on the retrieved standard clauses, the final applicable rule should be determined. At this point, it is only necessary to compare the requirements of the final applicable rule with the review content of the architectural drawings. There is no need to compare the items to be reviewed with all the retrieved clauses one by one. This reduces the number of comparisons and improves the review efficiency. Furthermore, each subsequent comparison can directly call the corresponding final applicable rule, reducing the steps required for review and further improving the review efficiency.

[0008] According to the above scheme, there are one or more items to be reviewed, and one or more final applicable rules; each item to be reviewed corresponds to one of the final applicable rules.

[0009] Furthermore, when multiple normative clauses are retrieved from the rule base, if the constraint objects in the constraint rules of the multiple normative clauses are the same, then the intersection of the multiple constraint rules is taken as the final constraint rule; if the constraint objects in the constraint rules of the multiple normative clauses are not completely the same, then the union of the multiple constraint rules is taken as the final constraint rule.

[0010] Therefore, determining the final applicable rule using different methods based on different situations can ensure that the final applicable rule simultaneously satisfies multiple normative clauses being invoked, while reducing the number of comparison items.

[0011] Further according to the above scheme, when there are both the same constraint objects and different constraint objects among multiple constraint objects, first find the intersection of the constraint rules of the same constraint objects, and then find the union of the intersection of the constraint rules of the same constraint objects and the constraint rules of other constraint objects.

[0012] Therefore, it can be seen that first finding the intersection of constraint rules with the same constraint objects, and then combining the intersection with the constraint rules of other constraint objects, can improve the speed of determining the final applicable rules, and at the same time determine the unique constraint conditions of each constraint object, ensuring that the final applicable rules are complete.

[0013] Further according to the above plan, the regulatory provisions include national standard provisions and construction industry standard provisions.

[0014] Furthermore, if the rule base does not store the normative clauses containing the content to be reviewed, then custom clauses are formulated based on the content to be reviewed, and the constraint rules of the custom clauses are used as the final applicable rules. The custom clauses include custom constraint rules.

[0015] Therefore, when there are no national standard clauses or construction industry standard clauses, custom clauses can be used to supplement them, ensuring that each project to be reviewed has applicable standard clauses.

[0016] Further according to the above scheme, if the rule base contains both the national standard clauses and custom clauses, then the final applicable rules for reviewing architectural drawings shall be re-formulated based on the national standard clauses; or, if the rule base contains both construction industry standard clauses and custom clauses, then the final applicable rules for reviewing architectural drawings shall be re-formulated based on the construction industry standard clauses; or, if the rule base contains both national standard clauses and construction industry standard clauses, then the final applicable rules for reviewing architectural drawings shall be re-formulated based on the national standard clauses and construction industry standard clauses; or, if the rule base contains both national standard clauses, construction industry standard clauses, and custom clauses, then the final applicable rules for reviewing architectural drawings shall be re-formulated based on the national standard clauses and construction industry standard clauses.

[0017] Therefore, national standard clauses and construction industry standard clauses have higher priority than custom clauses. When national standard clauses and construction industry standard clauses exist, they should be implemented first to ensure that the architectural drawings comply with the requirements of national standard clauses and construction industry standard clauses.

[0018] Further according to the above scheme, the content to be reviewed in the architectural drawings is compared with the final applicable rules. After determining whether the content to be reviewed meets the requirements of the final applicable rules, a review opinion is derived based on the comparison result between the content to be reviewed and the final applicable rules.

[0019] As can be seen from the above scheme, deriving review opinions based on the comparison results can help staff quickly understand the problems existing in the architectural drawings and solve them in a timely manner.

[0020] To achieve the second objective described above, the present invention provides a computer device including a processor and a memory, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the steps of the architectural drawing verification method described above.

[0021] To achieve the third objective mentioned above, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program thereon, wherein the computer program, when running, implements the steps of the above-mentioned architectural drawing verification method. Attached Figure Description

[0022] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of an embodiment of the method for verifying architectural drawings according to the present invention.

[0023] The present invention will be further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. Detailed Implementation

[0024] Example 1 of the method for verifying architectural drawings:

[0025] The architectural drawings in this invention include: two-dimensional drawings or three-dimensional models, and other architectural drawings, see [link / reference]. Figure 1 In this embodiment, the building is a single residential building, and the architectural drawings are a three-dimensional civil engineering model (the aforementioned three-dimensional model). This three-dimensional civil engineering model can be directly created or generated from two-dimensional drawings. The two-dimensional drawings include the single building's floor plan, elevation, and section drawings, etc. The item to be reviewed in the architectural drawings is whether the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the exterior windows of each room of the building meets the specified requirements. When executing the architectural drawing review method, S1 is executed first to establish a rule base. The rule base includes two or more normative clauses for reviewing the items to be reviewed in the architectural drawings. These normative clauses include constraint rules for reviewing the items to be reviewed. The normative clauses in the aforementioned rule base include national standard clauses related to construction, construction industry standard clauses, and custom clauses. Hereinafter, national standard clauses will be referred to as national standard clauses, and construction industry standard clauses will be referred to as industry clauses. The normative clauses in the rule base are first searched and included from existing national standard clauses and industry clauses. When there is no corresponding national standard clause for the project to be reviewed, custom clauses that can be applied to the actual situation need to be created by combining the characteristics of the project to be reviewed and industry experience. These custom clauses can be formulated from multiple perspectives, and there can be multiple custom clauses formulated from multiple perspectives. Multiple custom clauses make normative requirements on the content of the project to be reviewed.

[0026] Next, S2 is executed to import the architectural drawings to be reviewed and identify the information in the architectural drawings. Based on the content to be reviewed in the architectural drawings, the standard clauses containing the content to be reviewed are retrieved from the rule base. Among them, the priority of national standard clauses and industry clauses is higher than that of custom clauses. When national standard clauses, industry clauses and custom clauses of the item to be reviewed exist in the rule base at the same time, the national standard clauses and industry clauses are used first to review the item to be reviewed. In this embodiment, when reviewing whether the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the windows of each room of the building meets the specified requirements, the national standard clauses called are three types: building-related standard clauses, building energy-saving standard clauses, and fire smoke exhaust standard clauses. Specifically, they are the "Residential Design Code" GB50096-2011, the "Energy-Saving Design Standard for Residential Buildings in Hot Summer and Warm Winter Areas" JGJ75-2012, and the "Technical Standard for Building Smoke Control and Exhaust Systems" GB51251-2017.

[0027] Then, S3 is executed to determine the final applicable rules for reviewing architectural drawings based on the constraint rules of the specification clauses retrieved from the rule base.

[0028] Article 7.2.4 of the "Code for Design of Residential Buildings" (GB50096-2011) stipulates that the area of ​​direct or indirect natural ventilation openings in rooms using natural ventilation should comply with the following rules:

[0029] 1. The area of ​​direct natural ventilation openings in bedrooms, living rooms (halls), and bathrooms with windows should not be less than 1 / 20 of the floor area of ​​the room;

[0030] 2. The area of ​​the direct natural ventilation opening in the kitchen should not be less than 1 / 10 of the room's floor area, and should not be less than 0.60m². 2 ;

[0031] Article 4.0.13 of the "Energy-Saving Design Standard for Residential Buildings in Hot Summer and Warm Winter Areas" (JGJ75-2012) stipulates that for main rooms (bedrooms, studies, living rooms, etc.) that meet the requirements of Article 4.0.5 of this standard, the exterior windows should have a relatively large area, and the ventilation opening area should be designed to be no less than 10% of the floor area of ​​the room. For exterior windows in kitchens, bathrooms, and outdoor public areas, the ventilation opening area should be designed to be no less than 45% of the exterior window area.

[0032] Article 3.2.1 of the "Technical Standard for Smoke Control and Exhaust Systems in Buildings" (GB51251-2017) stipulates that enclosed stairwells and smoke-proof stairwells using natural ventilation should have a smoke control system with an area of ​​not less than 1.0m² at the highest point. 2 The building should have operable exterior windows or openings; when the building height exceeds 10m, additionally, an area of ​​not less than 2.0m² should be provided on the exterior walls of the stairwell every 5 floors. 2 The windows or openings can be opened, and the spacing between them should not exceed 3 floors.

[0033] Combining the above three sets of regulations and comparing the corresponding regulations for each room, the final applicable rules for verifying the natural ventilation opening area of ​​exterior windows in each room of the architectural drawings are derived. The comparison results are shown in Table 1:

[0034] Table 1

[0035]

[0036]

[0037] Furthermore, let's take the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the exterior windows in the bedroom and kitchen as examples in Table 1 for verification:

[0038] Bedroom: Building codes stipulate that the natural ventilation opening area of ​​a bedroom's exterior window should be no less than 1 / 20 of the room's floor area; building energy conservation codes stipulate that it should be no less than 10% of the room's floor area; fire safety and smoke extraction codes do not specify any restrictions on the natural ventilation opening area of ​​a bedroom's exterior window. Since both building codes and energy conservation codes apply to the room's floor area, the intersection of these two constraints is taken: the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the bedroom's exterior window must be the maximum of 1 / 20 or 10% of the bedroom's floor area. Therefore, the applicable rule is the building energy conservation code (Standard for Energy Conservation Design of Residential Buildings in Hot Summer and Warm Winter Areas JGJ75-2012). Thus, as long as the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the bedroom's exterior window is no less than 1 / 10 of the bedroom's floor area, the requirements of the building codes, energy conservation codes, and fire safety and smoke extraction codes are simultaneously met.

[0039] Kitchen: Building codes stipulate that the natural ventilation opening area of ​​a bedroom's exterior window must be no less than 1 / 10 of the room's floor area and no less than 0.60m². 2 Building energy efficiency regulations stipulate that the natural ventilation opening area of ​​bedroom windows should not be less than 45% of the window area; fire safety regulations do not specify restrictions on the natural ventilation opening area of ​​bedroom windows; however, building type regulations stipulate that it should not be less than 1 / 10 of the room's floor area, and not less than 0.60m². 2 The constraints are the percentage of the room floor area and the minimum actual area of ​​the natural ventilation opening of the exterior window, which are unrelated. Therefore, the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the exterior window must satisfy both constraints simultaneously. Meanwhile, the building energy efficiency regulations stipulate that the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the exterior window in a bedroom must be no less than 45% of the window area. This constraint is a percentage of the window area. However, the percentage of the window area cannot be directly compared to the percentage of the room floor area or the minimum natural ventilation opening area. Therefore, the kitchen exterior window area must simultaneously satisfy the constraints of both building type regulations and building energy efficiency regulations. In other words, the intersection of these two constraints will be taken as the final applicable rule for the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the kitchen exterior window.

[0040] Based on the final applicable rules for the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the exterior windows of bedrooms and kitchens, when there are both identical and different constraint objects among multiple constraint objects, the intersection of the constraint rules for the same constraint objects can be obtained first, and then the intersection of the constraint rules for the same constraint objects and the union of the constraint rules for other constraint objects can be obtained as the final applicable rule to reduce the number of constraint rules in the final applicable rule and improve the comparison efficiency.

[0041] Next, execute S4 to compare the content to be reviewed in the architectural drawings with the final applicable rules to determine whether the content to be reviewed meets the requirements of the final applicable rules.

[0042] The architectural drawings were reviewed and compared against the final applicable rules in Table 1 to check whether the ventilation opening area of ​​each room in the architectural drawings met the requirements.

[0043] Table 2 provides examples of bedrooms, bathrooms, and kitchens:

[0044] Table 2

[0045]

[0046]

[0047] As shown in Table 2, the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the exterior windows in the bedrooms and bathrooms complies with the constraint rules in the final applicable rules; the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the exterior windows in the kitchen is 0.5m². 2 Less than 0.6m 2 Therefore, the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the kitchen's exterior window does not meet the required standards.

[0048] Finally, S5 is executed to derive review opinions based on the comparison results between the content to be reviewed and the final applicable rules.

[0049] The review opinion for this embodiment is that the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the exterior windows in the bedroom and bathroom meets the specified requirements, while the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the exterior window in the kitchen does not meet the specified requirements; the natural ventilation opening area of ​​the kitchen exterior window is 0.5m². 2 Building codes stipulate that the natural ventilation opening area of ​​kitchen exterior windows must not be less than 0.6m². 2 .

[0050] Example 2 of the method for verifying architectural drawings:

[0051] The difference between the method for reviewing architectural drawings in this embodiment and that in Embodiment 1 is that the content of the review is whether the location of the split-type outdoor air conditioning unit in the residential building meets the usage requirements.

[0052] Since there are no relevant national standards or industry specifications for air conditioner unit locations, the specifications used in the rule base for verifying whether residential split-type outdoor air conditioner unit locations meet the usage requirements need to be created independently. These independently created specifications are referred to as custom specifications.

[0053] The review of the customized specifications mainly includes: whether outdoor air conditioning unit locations have been reserved, whether the locations of the air conditioning units are feasible, and whether the dimensions of the air conditioning units meet the installation requirements. Whether outdoor air conditioning unit locations have been reserved includes determining from the model whether outdoor air conditioning unit locations have been reserved for each main functional room; whether the locations of the air conditioning units are feasible includes: ① whether they can be installed and maintained within the unit; ② whether they cannot be installed in enclosed spaces; ③ whether a predetermined distance is left when two air conditioning units face each other in the recess. Whether the dimensions of the air conditioning units meet the installation requirements includes: the dimensions of the air conditioning unit locations must simultaneously meet the requirements for the dimensions of the air conditioning unit itself, the return air clearance with surrounding structures, and the louver size. Based on these requirements, the final dimensions of the air conditioning unit locations are determined, and the dimensions of the air conditioning unit locations on the architectural drawings are compared with the final dimensions to provide the review results.

[0054] When reviewing whether the size of the outdoor split air conditioner unit in a residential building meets the usage requirements, the multiple custom specifications are first included in the rule base. Then, the final applicable rules for this review are re-formulated based on the multiple custom specifications, and the review is carried out according to the review method in Example 1.

[0055] The main steps of the review are:

[0056] Identify the air conditioner-related information for the unit to be installed;

[0057] Read whether an air conditioner unit space is reserved in the architectural drawings. If an air conditioner unit space is reserved, read the length, width, and clear height of the air conditioner unit space in the architectural drawings.

[0058] The length, width, and net height of the air conditioner installation location are compared with the final dimensions of the outdoor air conditioner installation location in the applicable rules to determine the feasibility of the outdoor air conditioner installation location.

[0059] Computer device embodiment:

[0060] The computer device in this embodiment includes a processor and a memory. The memory stores a computer program. When the processor executes the computer program, it implements each step of the above-mentioned method for reviewing architectural drawings. The computer device also reserves an interface for modifying computer constraint rules according to the specification update, thereby improving future applicability.

[0061] A computer device may include, but is not limited to, a processor and memory. Those skilled in the art will understand that a computer device may include more or fewer components, or a combination of certain components, or different components; for example, a computer device may also include input / output devices, network access devices, buses, etc.

[0062] For example, a processor can be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), or other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSPs), application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. A general-purpose processor can be a microcontroller or any conventional processor. The processor is the control center of a computer device, connecting all parts of the computer device through various interfaces and lines.

[0063] The memory can be used to store computer programs and / or modules. The controller implements various functions of the computer device by running or executing the computer programs and / or modules stored in the memory, and by accessing data stored in the memory. For example, the memory may mainly include a program storage area and a data storage area. The program storage area may store the operating system, at least one application program required for a function (e.g., sound receiving function, sound-to-text function, etc.), etc.; the data storage area may store data created based on the use of the mobile phone (e.g., audio data, text data, etc.). In addition, the memory may include high-speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as hard disk, RAM, plug-in hard disk, smart media card (SMC), secure digital (SD) card, flash card, at least one disk storage device, flash memory device, or other volatile solid-state storage device.

[0064] Examples of computer-readable storage media:

[0065] If the modules integrated into the computer device in the above embodiments are implemented as software functional units and sold or used as independent products, they can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, all or part of the processes in the method embodiments for reviewing architectural drawings can also be implemented by a computer program instructing related hardware. The computer program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When executed by a controller, the computer program can implement the steps of the method embodiments for playing back and analyzing violation data during tunnel construction. The computer program includes computer program code, which can be in the form of source code, object code, executable files, or certain intermediate forms. The storage medium can include: any entity or device capable of carrying computer program code, recording media, USB flash drives, portable hard drives, magnetic disks, optical disks, computer memory, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), electrical carrier signals, telecommunication signals, and software distribution media, etc. It should be noted that the content contained in computer-readable media may be appropriately added to or subtracted from the requirements of legislation and patent practice in a jurisdiction. For example, in some jurisdictions, computer-readable media may not include electrical carrier signals and telecommunication signals, in accordance with legislation and patent practice.

[0066] It should be noted that the above are only preferred embodiments of the present invention, but the design concept of the invention is not limited thereto. Any non-substantial modifications made to the present invention using this concept also fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for verifying architectural drawings, comprising: S1: Establish a rule base, which includes two or more standard clauses for reviewing the architectural drawings and the standard clauses include constraint rules for reviewing the architectural drawings. S2: Import the architectural drawings to be reviewed, identify the information of the architectural drawings; based on the content to be reviewed in the architectural drawings, retrieve the standard clauses containing the content to be reviewed from the rule base; Its features are: S3: Based on the constraint rules of the specification clauses retrieved from the rule base, formulate the final applicable rules for reviewing the architectural drawings; S4: Compare the content to be reviewed in the architectural drawings with the final applicable rules to determine whether the content to be reviewed meets the requirements of the final applicable rules; Step S3 includes: If the constraint objects in the constraint rules of multiple normative clauses are the same, then the intersection of the multiple constraint rules shall be taken as the final constraint rule. If the constraint objects in the constraint rules of multiple normative clauses are not completely the same, the union of the multiple constraint rules is taken as the final constraint rule: when there are both the same constraint object and different constraint objects among the multiple constraint objects, first find the intersection of the constraint rules with the same constraint object, and then find the union of the intersection of the constraint rules with the same constraint object and the constraint rules with other constraint objects.

2. The method for verifying architectural drawings according to claim 1, characterized in that: The content to be reviewed may be one or more, and the final applicable rule may be one or more; each content to be reviewed corresponds to one final applicable rule.

3. The method for verifying architectural drawings according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that: The aforementioned regulations include national standard regulations and construction industry standard regulations.

4. The method for verifying architectural drawings according to claim 3, characterized in that, Step S3 further includes: If the rule base does not store the standard clause containing the content to be reviewed, then a custom clause is formulated based on the content to be reviewed, and the constraint rules of the custom clause are used as the final applicable rules. The custom clause includes the custom constraint rules.

5. The method for verifying architectural drawings according to claim 4, characterized in that, Step S3 further includes: If the rule base contains both the national standard clauses and the custom clauses, then the final applicable rules for reviewing the architectural drawings shall be re-formulated based on the national standard clauses. Alternatively, if the rule base contains both the construction industry standard clauses and the custom clauses, then the final applicable rules for reviewing the architectural drawings shall be re-formulated based on the construction industry standard clauses. Alternatively, if the rule base contains both the national standard clauses and the construction industry standard clauses, then the final applicable rules for reviewing the architectural drawings shall be re-formulated based on the national standard clauses and the construction industry standard clauses. Alternatively, if the rule base contains the national standard clauses, construction industry standard clauses, and the custom clauses, then the final applicable rules for reviewing the architectural drawings shall be re-formulated based on the national standard clauses and construction industry standard clauses.

6. The method for verifying architectural drawings according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that, The method for reviewing architectural drawings also includes: After performing step S4, step S5 is also performed: based on the comparison results between the content to be reviewed and the final applicable rules, a review opinion is derived.

7. A computer device, comprising a processor and a memory, characterized in that: The memory stores a computer program that, when executed by the processor, implements the steps of the architectural drawing verification method as described in any one of claims 1 to 6.

8. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is run, it implements the steps of the method for verifying architectural drawings as described in any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images