Operation position placement quality evaluation method and related equipment

Abstract

The invention provides a surgical position placement quality evaluation method and related equipment. The comprehensiveness and scientificity of surgical position placement quality evaluation can be improved. The method comprises the following steps: determining body position placement nursing quality evaluation information according to a pre-constructed operative body position placement literature database, wherein the body position placement nursing quality evaluation information comprises a quality evaluation object, a quality evaluation item and quality evaluation content; according to the quality evaluation object, the quality evaluation item and the quality evaluation content, generating a body position placement quality evaluation index system; determining a weight vector of a standard index in the body position placement quality evaluation index system; performing standardization processing on the input monitoring data to obtain standard monitoring data; and determining a comprehensive evaluation result of the operative position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data according to the weight vector of the standard index and the standard monitoring data.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention relates to the technical field of nursing quality evaluation in operating rooms, and in particular to a surgical position placement quality evaluation method and related equipment. Background Art

[0002] Surgical positioning plays a vital role in the surgical process. The patient's position not only affects the exposure of the surgical site, but also affects the patient's safety and comfort during and after the operation. Common surgical positions include supine, prone, and lateral positions. Each position has its specific application scenarios and requirements, but no matter which position is used, ensuring the patient's safety during surgery is a key issue that the surgical team must face.

[0003] In actual operation, the placement of surgical positions often depends on the coordination and cooperation between operating room nurses, surgeons and anesthesiologists. However, due to the complexity of surgical positions and the special requirements of each operation, the current positioning methods and standards are difficult to meet actual needs in some cases. This may lead to a series of problems, such as intraoperative peripheral nerve injury, intraoperative pressure injury and eye injury. At present, most clinical work uses support equipment, positioning cushions, etc. to improve the patient's positioning effect to reduce potential risks during surgery.

[0004] Although the above improvements have improved the safety of surgical positioning to a certain extent, there are still some shortcomings. For example, the existing positioning methods often lack systematicity and standardization, which makes it difficult to unify and objectively evaluate the quality of nursing. Currently, there is limited research on the evaluation of surgical positioning quality, and there is a lack of scientific and reasonable evaluation index system and standardized tools. Summary of the invention

[0005] The embodiment of the present invention provides a surgical body position placement quality evaluation method and related equipment, which can improve the comprehensiveness and scientificity of surgical body position placement quality evaluation.

[0006] A first aspect of the present invention provides a method for evaluating the quality of surgical position placement, comprising:

[0007] Determining body position placement nursing quality evaluation information according to a pre-constructed surgical body position placement literature database, wherein the body position placement nursing quality evaluation information includes a quality evaluation object, quality evaluation items, and quality evaluation content;

[0008] Generate a body positioning quality assessment index system according to the quality assessment object, the quality assessment items and the quality assessment content;

[0009] Determining the weight vector of the standard index in the body positioning quality assessment index system;

[0010] Standardize the input monitoring data to obtain standard monitoring data;

[0011] A comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data is determined according to the weight vector of the standard indicator and the standard monitoring data.

[0012] A second aspect of the present invention provides a surgical position placement quality evaluation device, comprising:

[0013] A first determination module is used to determine body position placement nursing quality evaluation information according to a pre-constructed surgical body position placement literature database, wherein the body position placement nursing quality evaluation information includes a quality evaluation object, quality evaluation items and quality evaluation content;

[0014] A generating module, used for generating a body positioning quality assessment index system according to the quality assessment object, the quality assessment items and the quality assessment content;

[0015] A second determination module is used to determine the weight vector of the standard index in the body positioning quality assessment index system;

[0016] A processing module, used for standardizing the input monitoring data to obtain standard monitoring data;

[0017] The third determination module is used to determine the comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data according to the weight vector of the standard indicator and the standard monitoring data.

[0018] In a possible design, the first determining module is specifically configured to:

[0019] Extracting objects from the surgical position literature database to obtain the quality evaluation objects;

[0020] Extracting body position placement literature data in the surgical body position placement literature database based on a pre-constructed nursing quality index extraction model to obtain nursing quality indicators;

[0021] The nursing quality index is expanded to obtain the quality evaluation items and the quality evaluation content.

[0022] In a possible design, the first determination module extracts objects from the surgical position placement literature database to obtain the quality evaluation objects including:

[0023] Extracting the objects of each body position placement document in the surgical body position placement document database by a semantic extraction method to obtain an object set;

[0024] Screening the object set according to a preset screening criterion to obtain a screened object set;

[0025] The screening object set is sampled using a preset sampling method to obtain the quality evaluation object.

[0026] In a possible design, the second determining module is specifically configured to:

[0027] Determining a judgment matrix for each indicator in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system;

[0028] Eliminating the indicator data corresponding to the judgment matrix that does not meet the preset consistency conditions in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system to obtain a set of consistent indicators;

[0029] Determine a weight vector corresponding to each lower-layer indicator in the target lower layer based on the judgment matrix, wherein each lower-layer indicator is an indicator in the consistency indicator set, the target lower layer is any layer except the first layer in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system, and the weight vector is a weight vector of each lower-layer indicator relative to an upper-layer indicator in the upper layer corresponding to the target lower layer;

[0030] The weight vector corresponding to each lower-level indicator is determined as the weight vector of the standard indicator.

[0031] In a possible design, the second determination module determines the weight vector corresponding to each lower-layer indicator in the target lower layer based on the judgment matrix, including:

[0032] Calculating the product of each row of elements in a first judgment matrix corresponding to a first lower layer indicator, wherein the first lower layer indicator is any lower layer indicator in the target lower layer;

[0033] Calculating the Nth root of the product to obtain a vector value of the first lower layer indicator, where N is the dimension of the first judgment matrix;

[0034] The vector value of the first lower-layer indicator is standardized to obtain a weight vector corresponding to each lower-layer indicator.

[0035] In one possible design, the second determining module is further used to:

[0036] Calculating the maximum eigenvalue of a second judgment matrix corresponding to a second lower layer indicator, where the second lower layer indicator is any lower layer indicator in the target lower layer;

[0037] Determining a random consistency ratio of the second lower layer indicator according to the maximum eigenvalue and the dimension of the second judgment matrix;

[0038] If the random consistency ratio of the second lower-layer indicator exceeds a preset threshold, it is determined that the second lower-layer indicator meets the preset consistency condition.

[0039] In a possible design, the third determining module is specifically used to:

[0040] Determining a target value corresponding to the standard indicator in the standard monitoring data;

[0041] Multiplying the weight vector by the target value to obtain an evaluation value of each standard indicator in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system;

[0042] The evaluation values ​​of each standard indicator are added together to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data.

[0043] A third aspect of the present invention provides an electronic device, comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the processor is configured to implement the steps of the surgical position placement quality evaluation method as described in the first aspect when executing a computer management program stored in the memory.

[0044] A fourth aspect of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer management program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the surgical position placement quality evaluation method as described in the first aspect above.

[0045] In summary, it can be seen that in the embodiment provided by the present invention, when evaluating the quality of surgical body positioning, a body positioning quality evaluation index system for the body positioning quality to be evaluated is first established, and then the weight values ​​of the indicators at each level in the body positioning quality evaluation index system are calculated and set, the monitoring data of the bottom-level indicators are input and stored, the input monitoring data is standardized, and the evaluation values ​​of the sub-targets at each level are calculated and output, and finally, the comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical body positioning quality is obtained by comprehensive calculation based on the evaluation values ​​of the sub-targets at each level. Compared with the existing reliance on coordination and cooperation between operating room nurses, surgeons and anesthesiologists, the comprehensiveness and scientificity of the surgical body positioning quality evaluation can be improved. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0046] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of a flow chart of a surgical position placement quality evaluation method provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0047] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a body positioning quality assessment index system provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0048] Figure 3 A virtual structural diagram of a surgical position placement quality evaluation device provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0049] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the hardware structure of a surgical position placement quality assessment device provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0050] Figure 5 A schematic diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0051] Figure 6 A schematic diagram of an embodiment of a computer-readable storage medium provided for an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0052] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0053] In the following description, specific embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to steps and symbols performed by one or more computers, unless otherwise stated. Therefore, these steps and operations will be mentioned several times as being performed by a computer, and computer execution referred to herein includes operations by a computer processing unit of electronic signals representing data in a structured form. This operation converts the data or maintains it at a location in the computer's memory system, which can be reconfigured or otherwise change the operation of the computer in a manner familiar to testers in the field. The data structure maintained by the data is a physical location in the memory, which has specific characteristics defined by the data format. However, the principles of the present invention are described in the above text, which does not represent a limitation, and testers in the field will understand that the various steps and operations described below can also be implemented in hardware.

[0054] The principles of the present invention operate with many other general or special purpose computing, communication environments or configurations. Examples of well-known computing systems, environments and configurations suitable for use with the present invention may include, but are not limited to, handheld phones, personal computers, servers, multiprocessor systems, microcomputer-based systems, mainframe computers, and distributed computing environments, including any of the above systems or devices.

[0055] The terms "first", "second", and "third" in the present invention are used to distinguish different objects rather than to describe a specific order. In addition, the terms "include", "have", and any variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions.

[0056] The surgical position placement quality evaluation method provided by the present invention is described below from the perspective of a surgical position placement quality evaluation device. The surgical position placement quality evaluation device may be a server or a service unit in a server, and is not specifically limited.

[0057] See also Figure 1 , Figure 1 A flow chart of a surgical position placement quality evaluation method provided by an embodiment of the present invention, the surgical position placement quality evaluation method comprising:

[0058] 101. Determine the nursing quality evaluation information for surgical positioning based on a pre-constructed surgical positioning literature database.

[0059] In this embodiment, the surgical position placement quality evaluation device can first construct a surgical position placement literature database. Specifically, it can collect existing surgical position placement literature data and summarize the existing surgical position placement literature data to generate a surgical position placement literature database; thereafter, the surgical position placement quality evaluation device determines the position placement nursing quality evaluation information based on the surgical position placement literature database, wherein the position placement nursing quality evaluation information includes quality evaluation objects, quality evaluation items and quality evaluation content.

[0060] In one embodiment, the surgical body position placement quality evaluation device determines the body position placement nursing quality evaluation information based on a pre-constructed surgical body position placement literature database, including:

[0061] Objects were extracted from the surgical positioning literature database to obtain quality evaluation objects;

[0062] Based on the pre-built nursing quality index extraction model, the body positioning literature data in the surgical body positioning literature database is extracted to obtain the nursing quality index;

[0063] The nursing quality indicators are expanded to obtain quality evaluation items and quality evaluation contents.

[0064] In this embodiment, the surgical body position placement quality evaluation device can use a preset semantic extraction method (the semantic extraction method includes but is not limited to natural language processing, semantic network and knowledge graph, context perception, machine learning and other methods) to extract the object of each body position placement document in the surgical body position placement document database, and then obtain an object set, and filter the object set according to a preset screening standard (the preset screening standard includes but is not limited to the standardization of indicator definition, the importance of indicator and the availability of data collection) to obtain a screening object set, and finally use a preset sampling method (the preset sampling method includes but is not limited to statistical sampling, non-statistical sampling, attribute sampling, variable sampling and other sampling methods) to sample the screening object set to obtain a quality evaluation object;

[0065] At the same time, the surgical body position placement quality evaluation device can pre-construct a nursing quality index extraction model, and extract the body position placement literature data in the surgical body position placement literature database through the nursing quality index extraction model to obtain the nursing quality index; wherein, the method of constructing the nursing quality index extraction model can adopt a deep neural network or a recurrent neural network, and there is no specific limitation, as long as a model that can extract the nursing quality index can be constructed; that is, the surgical body position placement quality evaluation device can use the body position placement related literature data in the body position placement literature database as the input data of the nursing quality index extraction model, and output the nursing quality index;

[0066] Finally, after obtaining the nursing quality index, the nursing quality index can be expanded using a preset semantic expansion method to obtain quality evaluation items (the quality evaluation items are also indicators) and quality evaluation content (the quality evaluation content is also the definition of the indicator). The preset semantic expansion method includes but is not limited to synonym expansion, feature expansion, synthesis expansion and structural expansion. Synonymous expansion adds words with the same or similar meanings as the original words to the semantic model to increase the diversity and richness of the vocabulary; feature expansion adds relevant features or attributes to the vocabulary, which can describe the context, usage scenarios or other relevant characteristics of the vocabulary; synthesis expansion combines multiple words to form new words or phrases to expand the semantic model; structural expansion focuses on the structural relationship between words, and expands the semantics by analyzing the grammatical structure and relationship between words. Please refer to Table 1, which shows the quality evaluation items and quality evaluation contents in the surgical position placement quality evaluation index system provided by the embodiment of the present invention, including 3 first-level indicators, 7 second-level indicators, and 19 third-level indicators.

[0067] Table 1

[0068]

[0069]

[0070]

[0071] 102. Generate a body positioning quality assessment index system based on the quality assessment object, quality assessment items and quality assessment content.

[0072] In this embodiment, after determining the body position placement nursing quality evaluation information, the surgical body position placement quality evaluation device can generate a body position placement quality evaluation index system based on the quality evaluation object, quality evaluation items and quality evaluation content, that is, based on the characteristics of the surgical body position placement literature database and quality evaluation indicators, a multi-level body position placement quality evaluation index system is constructed. The system includes a target layer and a content layer subordinate to the target layer and having at least one indicator. The system also includes at least one intermediate layer, which is between the target layer and the content layer and has at least one indicator. The body position placement quality evaluation index system is as follows: Figure 2 shown.

[0073] It should be noted that the indicators of the same layer in the position placement quality assessment indicator system depend on the indicators of the upper layer or affect the indicators of the upper layer, and have a dominant effect on the indicators of the lower layer. The uppermost layer in the position placement quality assessment indicator system is the target layer (surgical position placement quality evaluation indicator system), which usually has only one factor; the lowermost layer is the content layer, which is usually a specific indicator; the middle layer can contain one or more layers, usually a criterion layer. If there are too many indicators in each layer, it can be further subdivided into sub-indicator layers. The indicators in each layer generally do not exceed 9 to avoid increasing the complexity of comparison and affecting the quality of the model. Preliminary classification is carried out according to the actual significance of the indicators.

[0074] 103. Determine the weight vector of standard indicators in the body positioning quality assessment index.

[0075] In this embodiment, the surgical body position placement quality evaluation device can first determine the judgment matrix of each indicator in the body position placement quality evaluation index, and the judgment matrix is ​​used to compare the next layer indicators of each indicator in pairs, and calculate the maximum eigenvalue of the second judgment matrix corresponding to the second lower layer indicator, the second lower layer indicator is any lower layer indicator in the target lower layer, and the target lower layer is any layer except the first layer in the body position placement quality evaluation index system; determine the random consistency ratio of the second lower layer indicator according to the maximum eigenvalue and the dimension of the second judgment matrix; then judge whether the random consistency ratio of the second lower layer indicator exceeds the preset threshold value, if the random consistency ratio of the second lower layer indicator exceeds the preset threshold value, it is determined that the second lower layer indicator meets the preset consistency condition; thereby, the indicator data corresponding to the judgment matrix that meets the preset consistency condition in the body position placement quality evaluation index system can be obtained, and the indicator data corresponding to the judgment matrix that does not meet the preset consistency condition in the body position placement quality evaluation index system is eliminated to obtain a set of indicators that meet the consistency condition; please refer to Table 1, Table 1 is the scale and meaning of the judgment matrix, taking trait A and trait B as examples, 9 importance levels and their corresponding values ​​are listed.

[0076] Table 1

[0077]

[0078] It should be noted that the consistency test is used to analyze whether there are contradictions in the judgment matrix. For example, if among the three elements A, B, and C, A is more important than B, C is more important than A, but B is more important than C, this is obviously contradictory. If the judgment matrix passes the consistency test, it can be preliminarily considered that the data is reliable; otherwise, this set of data needs to be discarded.

[0079] Then, the weight vector corresponding to each lower-level indicator in the target lower layer is determined based on the judgment matrix. Each lower-level indicator is an indicator in the consistency indicator set. The weight vector is the weight vector of each lower-level indicator relative to the upper-level indicator in the upper layer corresponding to the target lower layer, such as Figure 2 As shown, if the lower-level indicator is "the number of body positioning equipment displacements", then the target lower layer is the level where the "number of body positioning equipment displacements" is located, and the weight vector of the lower-level indicator is the weight of the "number of body positioning equipment displacements" relative to the upper-level indicator ("stability of body positioning support") in the upper layer (the level corresponding to the "stability of body positioning support").

[0080] Continue reading Figure 2 The set of consistency indicators includes the number of times positioning equipment falls off, the number of times positioning equipment is displaced, the number of times falling out of bed, the number of times endotracheal tubes are displaced or fall off, the number of times arteriovenous catheters are displaced or fall off, the number of times monitoring equipment lines are displaced or fall off, the number of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries, the number of accidental eye injuries, the number of unprotected compressed parts, the number of limb parts not in physiological functional positions, the clarity of the intraoperative visual field, the number of unplanned intraoperative operating table adjustments, the number of unplanned intraoperative surgical position adjustments, the satisfaction with the intraoperative visual field exposure, the satisfaction with the position placement, the degree of pain related to the postoperative position, the degree of limb joint mobility related to the postoperative position, the degree of human fatigue, and the degree of limb pain.

[0081] It should be noted that when determining the weight vector corresponding to each lower-layer indicator in the target lower layer according to the judgment matrix, the product of each row element in the first judgment matrix corresponding to the first lower-layer indicator can be first calculated. The first lower-layer indicator is any lower-layer indicator in the target lower layer (such as Figure 2 ), then calculate the Nth root of the product to get the vector value of the first lower-level indicator, where N is the dimension of the first judgment matrix, and standardize the vector value of the first lower-level indicator to get the weight vector corresponding to each lower-level indicator, which is the weight vector of each indicator in the next layer of the corresponding indicator.

[0082] Combination Figure 2 The various indicators and the weights of the various indicators included in the surgical position placement quality evaluation index system of the present invention are shown in Table 2:

[0083] Table 2

[0084]

[0085]

[0086] It should be noted that for each generated judgment matrix, its maximum eigenvalue (hmax) is calculated, and then the consistency index (CI) is calculated using the formula C / =2m-", where n is the order of the matrix. The average random consistency index (RI) is obtained by averaging the consistency indexes of a large number of randomly generated judgment matrices. This value is used in subsequent consistency tests as a reference standard. In practical applications, for a given judgment matrix, its consistency ratio (CR=CI / RI) is calculated to determine whether the consistency of the matrix is ​​acceptable. If CR is less than 0.1, the consistency of the matrix is ​​considered acceptable; otherwise, the matrix needs to be corrected.

[0087] 104. Standardize the input monitoring data to obtain standard monitoring data.

[0088] In this embodiment, the surgical body position quality evaluation device can obtain input monitoring data and perform standard processing on the input monitoring data to obtain standard monitoring data, which includes indicator values ​​corresponding to standard indicators in the body position quality evaluation indicator system.

[0089] 105. Determine the comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data based on the weight vector of the standard indicators and the standard monitoring data.

[0090] In this embodiment, after determining the weight vector of the standard indicator and the standard monitoring data, the surgical position placement quality evaluation device can determine the target value corresponding to the standard monitoring data and the standard indicator, and multiply the weight vector by the corresponding target value to obtain the evaluation value of each standard indicator in the position placement quality evaluation indicator system; finally, the evaluation value of each standard indicator is added to obtain the corresponding comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality. That is, the weight of each standard indicator is multiplied by the value corresponding to the standard indicator and then added to obtain the corresponding comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality.

[0091] In summary, it can be seen that in the embodiment provided by the present invention, when evaluating the quality of surgical body positioning, a body positioning quality evaluation index system for the body positioning quality to be evaluated is first established, and then the weight values ​​of the indicators at each level in the body positioning quality evaluation index system are calculated and set, the monitoring data of the bottom-level indicators are input and stored, the input monitoring data is standardized, and the evaluation values ​​of the sub-targets at each level are calculated and output, and finally, the comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical body positioning quality is obtained by comprehensive calculation based on the evaluation values ​​of the sub-targets at each level. Compared with the existing reliance on coordination and cooperation between operating room nurses, surgeons and anesthesiologists, the comprehensiveness and scientificity of the surgical body positioning quality evaluation can be improved.

[0092] The above describes the embodiment of the present invention from the perspective of a surgical body position placement quality evaluation method. The following describes the embodiment of the present invention from the perspective of a surgical body position placement quality evaluation device.

[0093] See also Figure 3 , a virtual structural diagram of a surgical body position placement quality evaluation device in an embodiment of the present invention, the surgical body position placement quality evaluation device 300 comprises:

[0094] A first determination module 301 is used to determine body position placement nursing quality evaluation information according to a pre-constructed surgical body position placement literature database, wherein the body position placement nursing quality evaluation information includes a quality evaluation object, quality evaluation items and quality evaluation content;

[0095] A generating module 302, for generating a body positioning quality assessment index system according to the quality assessment object, the quality assessment items and the quality assessment content;

[0096] A second determination module 303 is used to determine the weight vector of the standard index in the body positioning quality assessment index system;

[0097] The processing module 304 is used to perform standardization processing on the input monitoring data to obtain standard monitoring data;

[0098] The third determination module 305 is used to determine the comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data according to the weight vector of the standard indicator and the standard monitoring data.

[0099] In a possible design, the first determining module 301 is specifically configured to:

[0100] Extracting objects from the surgical position literature database to obtain the quality evaluation objects;

[0101] Extracting body position placement literature data in the surgical body position placement literature database based on a pre-constructed nursing quality index extraction model to obtain nursing quality indicators;

[0102] The nursing quality index is expanded to obtain the quality evaluation items and the quality evaluation content.

[0103] In a possible design, the first determination module 301 extracts objects from the surgical position placement literature database to obtain the quality evaluation objects including:

[0104] Extracting the objects of each body position placement document in the surgical body position placement document database by a semantic extraction method to obtain an object set;

[0105] Screening the object set according to a preset screening criterion to obtain a screened object set;

[0106] The screening object set is sampled using a preset sampling method to obtain the quality evaluation object.

[0107] In a possible design, the second determining module 303 is specifically configured to:

[0108] Determining a judgment matrix for each indicator in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system;

[0109] Eliminating the indicator data corresponding to the judgment matrix that does not meet the preset consistency conditions in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system to obtain a set of consistent indicators;

[0110] Determine a weight vector corresponding to each lower-layer indicator in the target lower layer based on the judgment matrix, wherein each lower-layer indicator is an indicator in the consistency indicator set, the target lower layer is any layer except the first layer in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system, and the weight vector is a weight vector of each lower-layer indicator relative to an upper-layer indicator in the upper layer corresponding to the target lower layer;

[0111] The weight vector corresponding to each lower-level indicator is determined as the weight vector of the standard indicator.

[0112] In a possible design, the second determination module 303 determines the weight vector corresponding to each lower layer indicator in the target lower layer based on the judgment matrix, including:

[0113] Calculating the product of each row of elements in a first judgment matrix corresponding to a first lower layer indicator, wherein the first lower layer indicator is any lower layer indicator in the target lower layer;

[0114] Calculating the Nth root of the product to obtain a vector value of the first lower layer indicator, where N is the dimension of the first judgment matrix;

[0115] The vector value of the first lower-layer indicator is standardized to obtain a weight vector corresponding to each lower-layer indicator.

[0116] In a possible design, the second determining module 303 is further configured to:

[0117] Calculating the maximum eigenvalue of a second judgment matrix corresponding to a second lower layer indicator, where the second lower layer indicator is any lower layer indicator in the target lower layer;

[0118] Determining a random consistency ratio of the second lower layer indicator according to the maximum eigenvalue and the dimension of the second judgment matrix;

[0119] If the random consistency ratio of the second lower-layer indicator exceeds a preset threshold, it is determined that the second lower-layer indicator meets the preset consistency condition.

[0120] In a possible design, the third determining module 305 is specifically configured to:

[0121] Determining a target value corresponding to the standard indicator in the standard monitoring data;

[0122] Multiplying the weight vector by the target value to obtain an evaluation value of each standard indicator in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system;

[0123] The evaluation values ​​of each standard indicator are added together to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data.

[0124] above Figure 3 The surgical body position quality evaluation device in the embodiment of the present invention is described from the perspective of modular functional entities. The surgical body position quality evaluation device in the embodiment of the present invention is described in detail from the perspective of hardware processing. Figure 4 , a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a surgical body position placement quality evaluation device 400 in an embodiment of the present invention, the surgical body position placement quality evaluation device 400 comprises:

[0125] An input device 401, an output device 402, a processor 403 and a memory 404 (the number of the processor 403 can be one or more, Figure 4 In some embodiments of the present invention, the input device 401, the output device 402, the processor 403 and the memory 404 may be connected via a communication bus or other means, wherein: Figure 4 The communication bus connection is taken as an example.

[0126] Wherein, by calling the operation instruction stored in the memory 404, the processor 403 is used to perform the following steps:

[0127] Determining body position placement nursing quality evaluation information according to a pre-constructed surgical body position placement literature database, wherein the body position placement nursing quality evaluation information includes a quality evaluation object, quality evaluation items, and quality evaluation content;

[0128] Generate a body positioning quality assessment index system according to the quality assessment object, the quality assessment items and the quality assessment content;

[0129] Determining the weight vector of the standard index in the body positioning quality assessment index system;

[0130] Standardize the input monitoring data to obtain standard monitoring data;

[0131] A comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data is determined according to the weight vector of the standard indicator and the standard monitoring data.

[0132] By calling the operation instructions stored in the memory 404, the processor 403 is also used to execute Figure 1 Any method in the corresponding embodiment.

[0133] See also Figure 5 , Figure 5 A schematic diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0134] like Figure 5 As shown, an embodiment of the present invention provides an electronic device, including a memory 510, a processor 520, and a computer program 511 stored in the memory 510 and executable on the processor 520. When the processor 520 executes the computer program 511, the following steps are implemented:

[0135] Determining body position placement nursing quality evaluation information according to a pre-constructed surgical body position placement literature database, wherein the body position placement nursing quality evaluation information includes a quality evaluation object, quality evaluation items, and quality evaluation content;

[0136] Generate a body positioning quality assessment index system according to the quality assessment object, the quality assessment items and the quality assessment content;

[0137] Determining the weight vector of the standard index in the body positioning quality assessment index system;

[0138] Standardize the input monitoring data to obtain standard monitoring data;

[0139] A comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data is determined according to the weight vector of the standard indicator and the standard monitoring data.

[0140] In a specific implementation process, when the processor 520 executes the computer program 511, it can achieve Figure 1 Any implementation manner in the corresponding embodiments.

[0141] Since the electronic device introduced in this embodiment is a device used to implement a surgical position placement quality evaluation device in the embodiment of the present invention, based on the method introduced in the embodiment of the present invention, technical personnel in this field can understand the specific implementation mode of the electronic device of this embodiment and its various variations. Therefore, how the electronic device implements the method in the embodiment of the present invention will not be described in detail here. As long as the equipment used by technical personnel in this field to implement the method in the embodiment of the present invention falls within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0142] See also Figure 6 , Figure 6 A schematic diagram of an embodiment of a computer-readable storage medium provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0143] like Figure 6 As shown, the embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium 600, on which a computer program 611 is stored. When the computer program 611 is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0144] Determining body position placement nursing quality evaluation information according to a pre-constructed surgical body position placement literature database, wherein the body position placement nursing quality evaluation information includes a quality evaluation object, quality evaluation items, and quality evaluation content;

[0145] Generate a body positioning quality assessment index system according to the quality assessment object, the quality assessment items and the quality assessment content;

[0146] Determining the weight vector of the standard index in the body positioning quality assessment index system;

[0147] Standardize the input monitoring data to obtain standard monitoring data;

[0148] A comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data is determined according to the weight vector of the standard indicator and the standard monitoring data.

[0149] In the specific implementation process, the computer program 611 is executed by the processor to achieve Figure 1 Any implementation manner in the corresponding embodiments.

[0150] It should be noted that in the above embodiments, the description of each embodiment has its own emphasis, and for parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference can be made to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0151] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that embodiments of the present invention may be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Therefore, the present invention may take the form of a complete hardware embodiment, a complete software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware. Moreover, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) containing computer-usable program code.

[0152] The present invention is described with reference to flowcharts and / or block diagrams of methods, devices (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the present invention. It should be understood that each process and / or block in the flowchart and / or block diagram, as well as the combination of processes and / or blocks in the flowchart and / or block diagram, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, an embedded computer, or other programmable data processing device to generate a machine, so that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing device generate instructions for implementing the processes in the flowchart and / or block diagram. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in a block or multiple blocks.

[0153] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory capable of directing a computer or other programmable data processing device to operate in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture comprising an instruction device, which implements the process Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A function specified in one or more boxes.

[0154] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that a series of operating steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process, thereby providing instructions for implementing the process. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The steps for the functions specified in one or more boxes.

[0155] The embodiment of the present invention also provides a computer program product, which includes computer software instructions. When the computer software instructions are executed on a processing device, the processing device executes the following Figure 1 The process in the corresponding embodiment.

[0156] The computer program product includes one or more computer instructions. When the computer program instructions are loaded and executed on a computer, the process or function described in the embodiment of the present invention is generated in whole or in part. The computer may be a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, a computer network, or other programmable device. The computer instructions may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, or transmitted from one computer-readable storage medium to another computer-readable storage medium. For example, the computer instructions may be transmitted from one website site, computer, server or data center to another website site, computer, server or data center by wired (e.g., coaxial cable, optical fiber, digital subscriber line (DSL)) or wireless (e.g., infrared, wireless, microwave, etc.) means. The computer-readable storage medium may be any available medium that a computer can store or a data storage device such as a server or data center that includes one or more available media integrated. The available medium may be a magnetic medium (e.g., a floppy disk, a hard disk, a tape), an optical medium (e.g., a DVD), or a semiconductor medium (e.g., a solid state disk (SSD)), etc.

[0157] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the systems, devices and units described above can refer to the corresponding processes in the aforementioned method embodiments and will not be repeated here.

[0158] In the several embodiments provided by the present invention, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, devices and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device embodiments described above are only schematic. For example, the division of the units is only a logical function division. There are other division methods in actual implementation. For example, multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Another point is that the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, devices or units, which can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.

[0159] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0160] In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit. The above-mentioned integrated unit may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional units.

[0161] If the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product, and the computer software product is stored in a storage medium, including a number of instructions for a computer device (which can be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the method described in each embodiment of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), disk or optical disk, etc., various media that can store program codes.

[0162] As described above, the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit the same. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments may still be modified, or some of the technical features thereof may be replaced by equivalents. However, these modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the quality of surgical position placement, characterized in that: include: Determining body position placement nursing quality evaluation information according to a pre-constructed surgical body position placement literature database, wherein the body position placement nursing quality evaluation information includes a quality evaluation object, quality evaluation items, and quality evaluation content; Generate a body positioning quality assessment index system according to the quality assessment object, the quality assessment items and the quality assessment content; Determining the weight vector of the standard index in the body positioning quality assessment index system; Standardize the input monitoring data to obtain standard monitoring data; A comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data is determined according to the weight vector of the standard indicator and the standard monitoring data.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The determining of the body positioning nursing quality evaluation information based on the pre-constructed surgical body positioning literature database includes: Extracting objects from the surgical position literature database to obtain the quality evaluation objects; Extracting body position placement literature data in the surgical body position placement literature database based on a pre-constructed nursing quality index extraction model to obtain nursing quality indicators; The nursing quality index is expanded to obtain the quality evaluation items and the quality evaluation content.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The object extraction from the surgical position placement literature database to obtain the quality evaluation object includes: Extracting the objects of each body position placement document in the surgical body position placement document database by a semantic extraction method to obtain an object set; Screening the object set according to a preset screening criterion to obtain a screened object set; The screening object set is sampled using a preset sampling method to obtain the quality evaluation object.

4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that The weight vector of the standard index in the body positioning quality assessment index system is determined as follows: Determining a judgment matrix for each indicator in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system; Eliminating the indicator data corresponding to the judgment matrix that does not meet the preset consistency conditions in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system to obtain a set of consistent indicators; Determine a weight vector corresponding to each lower-layer indicator in the target lower layer based on the judgment matrix, wherein each lower-layer indicator is an indicator in the consistency indicator set, the target lower layer is any layer except the first layer in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system, and the weight vector is a weight vector of each lower-layer indicator relative to an upper-layer indicator in the upper layer corresponding to the target lower layer; The weight vector corresponding to each lower-level indicator is determined as the weight vector of the standard indicator.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that The step of determining the weight vector corresponding to each lower layer indicator in the target lower layer based on the judgment matrix includes: Calculating the product of each row of elements in a first judgment matrix corresponding to a first lower layer indicator, wherein the first lower layer indicator is any lower layer indicator in the target lower layer; Calculating the Nth root of the product to obtain a vector value of the first lower layer indicator, where N is the dimension of the first judgment matrix; The vector value of the first lower-layer indicator is standardized to obtain a weight vector corresponding to each lower-layer indicator.

6. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that Before eliminating the indicator data corresponding to the judgment matrix that does not meet the preset consistency condition in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system to obtain a consistent indicator set, the method further includes: Calculating the maximum eigenvalue of a second judgment matrix corresponding to a second lower layer indicator, where the second lower layer indicator is any lower layer indicator in the target lower layer; Determining a random consistency ratio of the second lower layer indicator according to the maximum eigenvalue and the dimension of the second judgment matrix; If the random consistency ratio of the second lower-layer indicator exceeds a preset threshold, it is determined that the second lower-layer indicator meets the preset consistency condition.

7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, 5 and 6, characterized in that: The comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data is determined according to the weight vector of the standard indicator and the standard monitoring data, including: Determining a target value corresponding to the standard indicator in the standard monitoring data; Multiplying the weight vector by the target value to obtain an evaluation value of each standard indicator in the body positioning quality assessment indicator system; The evaluation values ​​of each standard indicator are added together to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data.

8. A surgical position placement quality evaluation device, characterized in that: include: A first determination module is used to determine body position placement nursing quality evaluation information according to a pre-constructed surgical body position placement literature database, wherein the body position placement nursing quality evaluation information includes a quality evaluation object, quality evaluation items and quality evaluation content; A generating module, used for generating a body positioning quality assessment index system according to the quality assessment object, the quality assessment items and the quality assessment content; A second determination module is used to determine the weight vector of the standard index in the body positioning quality assessment index system; A processing module is used to perform standardization processing on the input monitoring data to obtain standard monitoring data; The third determination module is used to determine the comprehensive evaluation result of the surgical position placement quality corresponding to the input monitoring data according to the weight vector of the standard indicator and the standard monitoring data.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: include: A memory and a processor, wherein the processor is used to implement the surgical position placement quality evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 when executing the computer management program stored in the memory.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer management program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer management program is executed by the processor, the surgical position placement quality evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 is implemented.

Images