Geological element order evaluation method, system and equipment, storage medium and product

Abstract

The invention discloses a geological element sequence evaluation method and device, a storage medium and a product. The method comprises the following steps: constructing a geological element sequence evaluation mathematical model; and performing geological element sequencing by using the geological element sequencing mathematical model. According to the geological element sequencing mathematical model, the influence of time on exploration right value evaluation is clearly represented and displayed, the current exploration engineering cost can be quickly and accurately calculated according to all the current exploration engineering cost, and then the current exploration right value is quickly and accurately evaluated; the utility coefficient is decomposed into an exploration work weighted average quality coefficient, an exploration work plane arrangement rationality coefficient and an exploration work vertical arrangement rationality coefficient, so that the calculation of the utility coefficient is more detailed, and the overall meaning of each subitem coefficient and the utility coefficient is clearer; the method not only considers the influence of geological elements on the exploration right evaluation value, but also considers the influence of non-geological elements on the exploration right evaluation value, and the consideration is more comprehensive and reasonable.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of mineral resource evaluation, and in particular relates to a geological element evaluation method, system, equipment, storage medium and product. Background Art

[0002] At present, when evaluating the value of prospecting rights, the geological factor ranking method is often used to evaluate the value of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources. The geological factor ranking method is a method based on the contribution principle to indirectly estimate the value of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources. Specifically, the value estimated by the exploration cost-effectiveness method is used as the basic cost, and it is adjusted to derive the value of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources. The basis of the geological factor ranking method is the cost of all prospecting workload, and takes into account the quality and layout of the prospecting project, as well as the regional metallogenic geological conditions, prospecting signs, mineralization intensity and other factors related to geological factors, and their impact on the value of prospecting rights.

[0003] However, the traditional geological factor ranking method is not designed for the characteristics of solid mineral resources, that is, many analysis and calculation processes are not completely applicable to the value assessment of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources. Moreover, the traditional geological factor ranking method directly gives the calculation method of the current cost of prospecting workload, that is, it does not directly consider the time value of prospecting costs, and the calculation method of the utility coefficient is relatively extensive. The adjustment coefficient only considers the geological factors themselves, and does not consider the impact of non-geological factors such as politics, economy and society where the prospecting rights are located on the value of prospecting rights. In short, the traditional geological factor ranking method has the defects of not being targeted in the assessment of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources, not being comprehensive and detailed, and not being operational. The prospecting rights assessment results obtained are also difficult to truly reflect the value of the prospecting rights. Summary of the invention

[0004] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a geological element evaluation method, equipment, storage medium and product to solve the problem that the traditional geological element evaluation method is not comprehensive, making it difficult to truly reflect the value of prospecting rights, and has poor operability.

[0005] The present invention solves the above technical problems through the following technical solutions: a method for evaluating geological elements of solid mineral resources, comprising:

[0006] A mathematical model for evaluating geological elements is constructed, and the expression of the mathematical model is:

[0007] P=C r ×F×α×β;

[0008] C r =C0×(1+r) t ; F = f1 × f2 × f3;

[0009] Among them, P represents the assessed value of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources, C r represents the replacement cost, F represents the utility coefficient, α represents the geological factor adjustment coefficient, β represents the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient; C0 represents the monetary value when the exploration work is carried out, r represents the social discount rate considering price increases and inflation, t represents the number of years between the time of prospecting right transaction and the time of exploration work; f1 represents the weighted average quality coefficient of exploration work, f2 represents the rationality coefficient of the plane layout of exploration work, and f3 represents the rationality coefficient of the vertical layout of exploration work;

[0010] The geological element evaluation mathematical model is used to evaluate the geological elements of solid mineral resources.

[0011] Furthermore, the calculation formula for the monetary value of the exploration work is as follows:

[0012]

[0013] Among them, U i represents the amount of physical work completed in the i-th type of geological survey, P i represents the unit price of the physical work of geological exploration of the i-th category, N represents the number of categories of geological exploration, C I Represents indirect costs.

[0014] Furthermore, the weighted average quality coefficient f1 of the exploration work is equal to the weighted average of the quality coefficients of various geological exploration works and the replacement costs of various exploration works; the value range of the quality coefficients of various geological exploration works is determined based on the construction quality, whether the geological purpose is achieved, the reliability of the data and the guiding role;

[0015] The value range of the rationality coefficient f2 of the exploration work plane layout is determined based on whether the exploration project plane layout meets the exploration specification requirements, whether the exploration project plane layout is reasonable, whether the distribution range of the ore body on the plane is clear, and the estimated distribution range of the ore body on the plane;

[0016] The value range of the rationality coefficient f3 of the vertical arrangement of the exploration work is determined based on whether the vertical arrangement of the exploration project meets the requirements of the exploration specifications, whether the vertical arrangement of the exploration project is reasonable, whether the vertical distribution range of the ore body is ascertained, and the estimated vertical distribution range of the ore body.

[0017] Furthermore, the calculation formula of the geological element adjustment coefficient α is:

[0018]

[0019] in, represents the value premium index of the i-th geological element, represents the value discount index of the i-th geological element, m + The number of geological elements that represent the existence of a value premium index, m - Indicates the number of geological features for which there is a value discount index.

[0020] Furthermore, the calculation formula of the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient β is:

[0021]

[0022] in, represents the value premium index of the i-th non-geological element, represents the value discount index of the i-th non-geological element, n + The number of non-geological elements that represent the existence of a value premium index, n - Indicates the number of non-geological features for which there is a value discount index.

[0023] Furthermore, the method also includes evaluating the merits and demerits of the solid mineral resource prospecting right according to the utility coefficient F, the geological factor adjustment coefficient α and the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient β, specifically including:

[0024] When the first condition is met: F≥2, α≥4 and β≥2, the quality level of the solid mineral resource prospecting right is the optimal level;

[0025] When conditions 1, 3 and 5 are not met, and F×α×β≥1 is met, the quality level of the prospecting right for solid mineral resources is sub-optimal;

[0026] When the third condition is met: 1.3<F<1.5, 0.5<α<2.5 and 0.75<β<1.5, the quality level of the prospecting right for solid mineral resources is medium;

[0027] When conditions 1, 3 and 5 are not met, and F×α×β<1, the quality level of the prospecting right for solid mineral resources is inferior;

[0028] When condition five is met: F<1, α<0.2 and β<0.33, the quality level of the solid mineral resource prospecting right is the worst level.

[0029] Based on the same concept, the present invention also provides a geological element evaluation system for solid mineral resources, comprising:

[0030] The model building unit is used to build a geological element evaluation mathematical model; wherein the expression of the mathematical model is:

[0031] P=C r ×F×α×β;

[0032] C r=C0×(1+r) t ; F = f1 × f2 × f3;

[0033] Among them, P represents the assessed value of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources, C r represents the replacement cost, F represents the utility coefficient, α represents the geological factor adjustment coefficient, β represents the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient; C0 represents the monetary value when the exploration work is carried out, r represents the social discount rate considering price increases and inflation, t represents the number of years between the time of prospecting right transaction and the time of exploration work; f1 represents the weighted average quality coefficient of exploration work, f2 represents the rationality coefficient of the plane layout of exploration work, and f3 represents the rationality coefficient of the vertical layout of exploration work;

[0034] The evaluation unit is used to evaluate the geological elements using the geological element evaluation mathematical model.

[0035] Based on the same concept, the present invention also provides an electronic device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program / instruction stored in the memory, wherein the processor executes the computer program / instruction to implement the geological element evaluation method as described above.

[0036] Based on the same concept, the present invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium on which a computer program / instruction is stored. When the computer program / instruction is executed by a processor, the geological element evaluation method as described above is implemented.

[0037] Based on the same concept, the present invention also provides a computer program product, including a computer program / instruction, which implements the geological element evaluation method as described above when executed by a processor.

[0038] Beneficial Effects

[0039] Compared with the prior art, the advantages of the present invention are:

[0040] The present invention provides a geological element ranking method, and the constructed geological element ranking mathematical model clearly represents and displays the influence of time on the prospecting right value assessment of solid mineral resources, and can quickly and accurately calculate the current prospecting project cost from the total cost of the prospecting project at that time, and then quickly and accurately assess the current prospecting right value; decompose the utility coefficient into the influence of the weighted average quality coefficient of the exploration work, the rationality coefficient of the plane layout of the exploration work, and the rationality coefficient of the vertical layout of the exploration work, so that the calculation of the utility coefficient is more detailed, and the overall meaning of each sub-item coefficient and the utility coefficient is clearer; the present invention not only considers the influence of geological elements on the prospecting right assessment value of solid mineral resources, but also considers the influence of non-geological elements on the prospecting right assessment value of solid mineral resources, and the consideration is more comprehensive and reasonable. The present invention realizes the scientific and reasonable assessment of the prospecting right value of solid mineral resources, can truly reflect the prospecting right value of solid mineral resources, and has strong operability.

[0041] The present invention improves the calculation method of geological factor adjustment coefficient and non-geological factor adjustment coefficient, fully considers the differences in experts' cognition of geological factors and non-geological factors, considers the value index of geological factors and non-geological factors from the two directions of premium and discount, makes the value index more scientific, and makes the calculation of geological factor adjustment coefficient and non-geological factor adjustment coefficient more scientific.

[0042] The present invention also grades the quality of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources, based on the quality of exploration projects and rationality of layout, geological factor adjustment coefficients and non-geological factor adjustment coefficients, providing more comprehensive and useful information for the analysis and evaluation of the value of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0043] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only one embodiment of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.

[0044] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of the geological element evaluation method in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0045] The following is a clear and complete description of the technical solutions in the present invention in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0046] The technical solution of the present application is described in detail with specific embodiments below. The following specific embodiments can be combined with each other, and the same or similar concepts or processes may not be described in detail in some embodiments.

[0047] Example 1

[0048] like Figure 1 As shown, a method for evaluating geological elements of solid mineral resources provided by an embodiment of the present invention comprises the following steps:

[0049] Step 1: Construct a mathematical model for geological element evaluation.

[0050] In order to more scientifically and reasonably evaluate the value of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources, the present invention is based on the exploration cost-effectiveness method and the traditional geological factor ranking method. In the calculation of the evaluation value of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources, the influence of replacement cost, utility coefficient, geological factor adjustment coefficient and non-geological factor adjustment coefficient are considered. The expression of the constructed geological factor ranking mathematical model is:

[0051] P=C r ×F×α×β (1)

[0052] C r =C0×(1+r) t (2)

[0053] F=f1×f2×f3 (3)

[0054] Among them, P represents the assessed value of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources, C r represents the replacement cost, F represents the utility coefficient, α represents the geological factor adjustment coefficient, β represents the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient; C0 represents the monetary value when the exploration work is carried out, r represents the social discount rate considering price increases and inflation, t represents the number of years between the prospecting right transaction time and the exploration work start time; f1 represents the weighted average quality coefficient of the exploration work, f2 represents the rationality coefficient of the plane layout of the exploration work, and f3 represents the rationality coefficient of the vertical layout of the exploration work.

[0055] According to formula (2), the replacement cost C r Based on the monetary value C0 when the exploration work is carried out, and taking into account factors such as price increases and inflation in the interval years between the transaction time of the prospecting rights of solid mineral resources and the time when the exploration work is carried out. In a specific embodiment of the present invention, the calculation formula of the monetary value when the exploration work is carried out is:

[0056]

[0057] Among them, U irepresents the amount of physical work completed in the i-th type of geological survey, P i represents the unit price of the physical work of geological exploration of the i-th category (i.e., the product of price and standard cost), N represents the number of categories of geological exploration, C I Represents indirect costs such as rock and mineral testing, other geological work, and site construction.

[0058] The utility coefficient F is a correction coefficient for the replacement cost that is set to reflect the contribution of cost to value and is used to premium or discount the replacement cost. The utility coefficient F of the present invention includes the accumulation of the weighted average quality coefficient f1 of the exploration work, the rationality coefficient f2 of the plane layout of the exploration work, and the rationality coefficient f3 of the vertical layout of the exploration work, as shown in formula (3). In a specific embodiment of the present invention, the weighted average quality coefficient f1 of the exploration work is equal to the weighted average of the quality coefficients of various geological exploration works and the replacement costs of various exploration works. The quality coefficient of the exploration work is a coefficient set to reflect the quality of various relevant and effective exploration works, and its evaluation basis is shown in Table 1.

[0059] Table 1 Evaluation basis of exploration work quality coefficient

[0060]

[0061] The rationality coefficient f2 of the survey work plane layout reflects the rationality coefficient of the layout on the survey work plane, and its evaluation basis is shown in Table 2.

[0062] Table 2 Evaluation basis of rationality coefficient f2 of survey work plane layout

[0063]

[0064] The rationality coefficient f3 of vertical arrangement of exploration work reflects the rationality coefficient of the arrangement of exploration work in the vertical direction. The evaluation basis is shown in Table 3.

[0065] Table 3 Evaluation basis of rationality coefficient f3 of vertical arrangement of exploration work

[0066]

[0067] The weighted average quality coefficient f1 of the exploration work, the rationality coefficient f2 of the plane layout of the exploration work, and the rationality coefficient f3 of the vertical layout of the exploration work are the average results of the assignments of multiple experts. When the assignment of a coefficient by an expert is outside the average value of all the assignments of the coefficient ±50%, it is an invalid assignment. It is necessary to eliminate the invalid assignment and recalculate the average value of the remaining valid assignments to obtain the final value of the coefficient.

[0068] The geological factor adjustment coefficient α is a coefficient of premium or discount of solid mineral resources affected by prospecting potential and resource exploitation potential. The geological factor adjustment coefficient is a comprehensive value index of factors related to geological factors, such as regional metallogenic geological conditions, prospecting signs, mineralization intensity, ore quality and processing performance, mining technical conditions, mineral products and mining rights market situation, and infrastructure completeness. In a specific embodiment of the present invention, the calculation formula of the geological factor adjustment coefficient α is:

[0069]

[0070] in, represents the value premium index (i.e., enhancement index) of the i-th geological element, represents the value discount index (i.e. weakening index) of the i-th geological element, m + The number of geological elements that represent the existence of a value premium index, m - Indicates the number of geological features for which there is a value discount index.

[0071] For a certain geological element, due to differences in expert cognition, it may have both a strengthening index and a weakening index. For the convenience of calculation, when a geological element only has a strengthening index (or weakening index), the weakening index (or strengthening index) can be assigned a value of 1.00. The evaluation criteria for the neutral values ​​of various geological elements and their value indexes are shown in Table 4.

[0072] Table 4 Evaluation criteria for neutral values ​​of various geological elements and their value indexes

[0073]

[0074] The value premium index for a certain geological element, namely the enhancement index It is the average value assigned by multiple experts based on the geological element of the prospecting right to be evaluated being superior to the neutral value judgment standard of the geological element; the value discount index of a certain geological element, that is, the weakening index It is the average value assigned by multiple experts based on the fact that the geological element of the prospecting right to be evaluated is worse than the neutral value judgment standard of the geological element.

[0075] Intensification index of each geological element and weakening index The upper and lower limits are shown in Table 5.

[0076] Table 5 Value ranges of strengthening index and weakening index of each geological element

[0077] Geological elements Enhancement Index Range Weakness index range Regional mineralization geological conditions show 1.00～1.20 1.00～2.00 Prospecting sign display 1.00～1.20 1.00～2.00 Mineralization intensity and reserve scale display 1.00～3.00 1.00～2.00 Ore quality and processing performance 1.00～1.20 1.00～2.00 Mining technical conditions 1.00～1.20 1.00～2.00 Market situation of mineral products and mining rights 1.00～1.50 1.00～2.00 Technical facilities conditions 1.00～1.20 1.00～2.00

[0078] The strengthening index or weakening index of a geological element is the result of averaging the values ​​assigned by multiple experts. When the value assigned by a certain expert to a geological element is outside the average value of all the values ​​assigned to the geological element ±30%, it is an invalid value. It is necessary to eliminate the invalid value and recalculate the average value of the remaining valid values ​​to obtain the final value of the strengthening index and weakening index of the geological element.

[0079] The non-geological factor adjustment coefficient β is a coefficient of premium or discount of solid mineral resources affected by non-mineral geological factors such as the political, economic, financial, social and external construction conditions of the country or location where the prospecting right is located. The non-geological factor adjustment coefficient β is a comprehensive value index of factors related to political, economic and social factors that affect the value of the prospecting right of solid mineral resources, such as the national political environment, rule of law construction, financing difficulty, socio-economic situation, labor acquisition and external construction conditions of the country where the prospecting right of solid mineral resources is located. In a specific embodiment of the present invention, the calculation formula of the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient β is:

[0080]

[0081] in, represents the value premium index of the i-th non-geological element, represents the value discount index of the i-th non-geological element, n + The number of non-geological elements that represent the existence of a value premium index, n - Indicates the number of non-geological features for which there is a value discount index.

[0082] For a certain non-geological element, due to differences in expert cognition, it may have both a strengthening index and a weakening index. For the convenience of calculation, when a non-geological element only has a strengthening index (or weakening index), the weakening index (or strengthening index) can be assigned a value of 1.00. The evaluation criteria for the neutral values ​​of each non-geological element and its value index are shown in Table 6.

[0083] Table 6 Evaluation criteria for the neutral values ​​of non-geological elements and their value indexes

[0084]

[0085] For a non-geological element, the value premium index is the enhancement index. It is the average value of the neutral value judgment standard of the non-geological element that multiple experts believe is better than the non-geological element of the prospecting right to be evaluated; the value discount index of a certain non-geological element, that is, the weakening index It is the average value of the values ​​assigned by multiple experts that the non-geological element of the prospecting right to be evaluated is worse than the neutral value judgment standard of the non-geological element. The upper and lower limits of the strengthening index and weakening index of each factor of each non-geological element are shown in Table 7.

[0086] Table 7 Value ranges of strengthening index and weakening index of each non-geological element

[0087]

[0088] The strengthening index and weakening index of non-geological elements are the average results of the assignments of multiple experts. When the assignment of a non-geological element by an expert is outside the average value of all the assignments of the non-geological element ±30%, it is an invalid assignment. It is necessary to eliminate the invalid assignment and recalculate the average value of the remaining valid assignments to obtain the final value of the strengthening index and weakening index of the non-geological element.

[0089] Step 2: Use the mathematical model of geological element ranking to evaluate geological elements.

[0090] Substitute each parameter into formula (1) to (3) to calculate the prospecting right assessment value P.

[0091] Step 3: Evaluate the merits of the solid mineral resource prospecting rights based on the utility coefficient F, the geological factor adjustment coefficient α and the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient β, as shown in Table 8.

[0092] Table 8 Evaluation criteria for the quality of prospecting rights

[0093]

[0094] Example 2

[0095] This example takes the valuation of a prospecting right for a solid mineral resource in 2024 as an example. The prospecting right for the solid mineral resource was explored in 2017. The total exploration cost (including indirect costs of rock and mineral testing) was US$1.3 million at that time, and the average social discount rate from 2017 to date is 10%. The quality of the exploration project, the plane layout and vertical layout of the exploration project, and the evaluation and assignment of various geological elements and non-geological elements are obtained through analysis by the evaluators and experts, as shown in Table 9.

[0096] Table 9 Analysis and assignment of various coefficients or value indexes of a certain solid mineral resource prospecting right

[0097]

[0098]

[0099]

[0100] According to the data in Table 9 and formulas (2) and (4), the replacement cost of the prospecting right assessment is calculated as:

[0101] C r =130×(1+10%) 2024-2017 = US$2,533,300 (7)

[0102] According to formula (3), the utility coefficient of the prospecting right evaluation is calculated as:

[0103] F=1.35×1×2.2=2.97 (8)

[0104] According to formula (5), the geological factor adjustment coefficient for the prospecting right assessment is calculated as:

[0105]

[0106] According to formula (6), the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient for the prospecting right assessment is calculated as:

[0107]

[0108] Finally, the estimated value of the prospecting right is calculated according to formula (1):

[0109] P = 253.33 × 2.97 × 1.25 × 0.6 = 5.6429 million US dollars (11)

[0110] Therefore, when the prospecting rights are evaluated in 2024, the assessed value of the prospecting rights is US$5,642,900.

[0111] According to the values ​​of the utility coefficient, geological factor adjustment coefficient and non-geological factor adjustment coefficient, it can be seen that the quality and layout of the prospecting project of the solid mineral resource prospecting right are relatively good, the overall geological factors are conducive to the prospecting right premium, and the political and economic factors are generally not conducive to the prospecting right premium. Combined with Table 8, it can be seen that the quality level of the solid mineral resource prospecting right is sub-optimal.

[0112] Example 3

[0113] A geological element evaluation system for solid mineral resources provided by an embodiment of the present invention includes a model building unit and an evaluation unit.

[0114] The model building unit is used to build a mathematical model for evaluating geological elements; wherein the expression of the mathematical model is as shown in formulas (1) to (3) of Example 1.

[0115] The evaluation unit is used to evaluate geological elements using a geological element evaluation mathematical model.

[0116] Example 4

[0117] An embodiment of the present invention further provides an electronic device, which includes: a memory, a processor, and a computer program / instructions stored in the memory, and the processor executes the computer program / instructions to implement the geological element evaluation method in the embodiment of the present application.

[0118] Although not shown, the electronic device includes a processor, which can perform various appropriate operations and processes according to the program and / or data stored in the read-only memory (ROM) or the program and / or data loaded from the storage portion into the random access memory (RAM). The processor can be a multi-core processor, or it can include multiple processors. In some embodiments, the processor can include a general main processor and one or more special coprocessors, such as a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit (GPU), a neural network processor (NPU), a digital signal processor (DSP), etc. In RAM, various programs and data required for device operation are also stored. The processor, ROM and RAM are connected to each other via a bus. The input / output (I / O) interface is also connected to the bus.

[0119] The processor and memory are used together to execute the program / instructions stored in the memory. When the program / instructions are executed by the computer, the methods, steps or functions described in the above embodiments can be implemented.

[0120] Although not shown, the embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium on which a computer program / instruction is stored. When the computer program / instruction is executed by a processor, the geological element evaluation method in the embodiment of the present application is implemented.

[0121] Storage media in embodiments of the present invention include permanent and non-permanent, removable and non-removable items that can be implemented by any method or technology to store information. Examples of storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), other types of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices or any other non-transmission medium that can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device.

[0122] Readable storage media include permanent and non-permanent, removable and non-removable media that can be implemented by any method or technology to store information. Information can be computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), other types of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, disk storage or other magnetic storage devices or any other non-transmission media that can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. As defined herein, computer-readable media does not include temporary computer-readable media (transitory media), such as modulated data signals and carrier waves.

[0123] Although not shown, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer program product, including: a computer program / instruction, which, when executed by a processor, implements the geological element evaluation method in the embodiment of the present application.

[0124] What is disclosed above is only a specific implementation mode of the present invention, but the protection scope of the present invention is not limited thereto. Any technician familiar with the technical field can easily think of changes or modifications within the technical scope disclosed in the present invention, which should be covered within the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating geological elements of solid mineral resources, characterized in that: The method comprises: A mathematical model for evaluating geological elements is constructed, and the expression of the mathematical model is: P=C r ×F×α×β; C r =C0×(1+r) t ;F=f1×f2×f3; Among them, P represents the assessed value of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources, C r represents the replacement cost, F represents the utility coefficient, α represents the geological factor adjustment coefficient, β represents the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient; C0 represents the monetary value when the exploration work is carried out, r represents the social discount rate considering price increases and inflation, t represents the number of years between the time of prospecting right transaction and the time of exploration work; f1 represents the weighted average quality coefficient of exploration work, f2 represents the rationality coefficient of the plane layout of exploration work, and f3 represents the rationality coefficient of the vertical layout of exploration work; The geological element evaluation mathematical model is used to evaluate the geological elements of solid mineral resources.

2. The method for evaluating geological elements of solid mineral resources according to claim 1, characterized in that: The formula for calculating the monetary value at the time of the exploration work is: Among them, U i represents the amount of physical work completed in the i-th type of geological survey, P i represents the unit price of the physical work of geological exploration of the i-th category, N represents the number of categories of geological exploration, C I Represents indirect costs.

3. The method for evaluating geological elements of solid mineral resources according to claim 1, characterized in that: The weighted average quality coefficient f1 of the exploration work is equal to the weighted average of the quality coefficients of various geological exploration works and the replacement costs of various exploration works; the value range of the quality coefficients of various geological exploration works is determined based on the construction quality, whether the geological purpose is achieved, the reliability of the data and the guiding role; The value range of the rationality coefficient f2 of the exploration work plane layout is determined based on whether the exploration project plane layout meets the exploration specification requirements, whether the exploration project plane layout is reasonable, whether the distribution range of the ore body on the plane is clear, and the estimated distribution range of the ore body on the plane; The value range of the rationality coefficient f3 of the vertical arrangement of the exploration work is determined based on whether the vertical arrangement of the exploration project meets the requirements of the exploration specifications, whether the vertical arrangement of the exploration project is reasonable, whether the vertical distribution range of the ore body is ascertained, and the estimated vertical distribution range of the ore body.

4. The method for evaluating geological elements of solid mineral resources according to claim 1, characterized in that: The calculation formula of the geological element adjustment coefficient α is: in, represents the value premium index of the i-th geological element, represents the value discount index of the i-th geological element, m + The number of geological elements that represent the existence of a value premium index, m - Indicates the number of geological features for which there is a value discount index.

5. The method for evaluating geological elements of solid mineral resources according to claim 1, characterized in that: The calculation formula of the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient β is: in, represents the value premium index of the i-th non-geological element, represents the value discount index of the i-th non-geological element, n + The number of non-geological elements that represent the existence of a value premium index, n - Indicates the number of non-geological features for which there is a value discount index.

6. The method for evaluating geological elements of solid mineral resources according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that: The method further includes evaluating the quality of the solid mineral resource prospecting right according to the utility coefficient F, the geological factor adjustment coefficient α and the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient β, specifically including: When the first condition is met: F≥2, α≥4 and β≥2, the quality level of the solid mineral resource prospecting right is the optimal level; When conditions 1, 3 and 5 are not met, and F×α×β≥1 is met, the quality level of the prospecting right for solid mineral resources is sub-optimal; When the third condition is met: 1.3<F<1.5, 0.5<α<2.5 and 0.75<β<1.5, the quality level of the prospecting right for solid mineral resources is medium; When conditions 1, 3 and 5 are not met, and F×α×β<1, the quality level of the prospecting right for solid mineral resources is inferior; When condition five is met: F<1, α<0.2 and β<0.33, the quality level of the solid mineral resource prospecting right is the worst level.

7. A geological element ranking system for solid mineral resources, characterized in that: The system comprises: The model building unit is used to build a geological element evaluation mathematical model; wherein the expression of the mathematical model is: P=C r ×F×α×β; C r =C0×(1+r) t ;F=f1×f2×f3; Among them, P represents the assessed value of prospecting rights for solid mineral resources, C r represents the replacement cost, F represents the utility coefficient, α represents the geological factor adjustment coefficient, β represents the non-geological factor adjustment coefficient; C0 represents the monetary value when the exploration work is carried out, r represents the social discount rate considering price increases and inflation, t represents the number of years between the time of prospecting right transaction and the time of exploration work; f1 represents the weighted average quality coefficient of exploration work, f2 represents the rationality coefficient of the plane layout of exploration work, and f3 represents the rationality coefficient of the vertical layout of exploration work; The evaluation unit is used to evaluate the geological elements using the geological element evaluation mathematical model.

8. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program / instruction stored in the memory, characterized in that: The processor executes the computer program / instructions to implement the geological element evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program / instruction stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program / instruction is executed by a processor, the geological element evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 is implemented.

10. A computer program product comprising a computer program / instructions, characterized in that When the computer program / instruction is executed by a processor, the geological element evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 is implemented.

Images