Equipment parameter determination method for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft

Abstract

The invention relates to an equipment parameter determination method for an advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, which combines a corresponding battlefield environment and a combat system, carries out a series of combat simulation deduction and efficiency evaluation analysis through a matched simulation deduction platform, and finally forms a set of equipment parameters of the advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft. Meanwhile, due to the fact that the advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft has extremely high battlefield application requirements in a future battlefield, battlefield action design can be carried out by means of battlefield simulation deduction, meanwhile, a set of index system matched with the battlefield simulation deduction is constructed, and the battlefield action design is corrected by taking a result formed by efficiency evaluation as a feedback means. And finally forming the equipment parameters of the advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft through multiple iterations. The method is used for completing the forward design process of the equipment design of the advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, has extremely high engineering significance, and effectively supports the subsequent development direction, key technology extraction and engineering prototype development of the advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft equipment.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of aviation vehicles and relates to an equipment parameter determination method for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft. Background Art

[0002] Advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft refers to aircraft that are different from conventional layouts and have innovative aerodynamic layouts (appearance characteristics), such as waverider layout aircraft, tilt-rotor aircraft, variable configuration aircraft, C-wing aircraft, etc.

[0003] In the previous demonstration and conceptual design process of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, the design process of "research needs-comparison of parameters of competing models-formation of overall equipment parameters" was usually adopted. Under the conditions that the future combat application prospects of advanced layout aircraft are unclear and the system contribution is uncertain, the development of equipment design has certain restrictions on the application of advanced aerodynamic layout characteristics and subsequent modification and innovation. In addition, the equipment design process of existing aircraft equipment has a low correlation with factors such as combat needs, combat simulation, and adaptability to application scenarios. Therefore, it is necessary to form a set of forward equipment development processes for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft through iterative combination of combat scenario design, combat simulation, and effectiveness evaluation. Summary of the invention

[0004] The technical problem solved by the present invention is: to overcome the shortcomings of the prior art, to propose a method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, to realize the combined application of the design of advanced layout aircraft with combat simulation and effectiveness evaluation, and to meet the urgent engineering needs of the overall demonstration of advanced layout aircraft, the aerodynamic design of advanced layout aircraft, combat simulation deduction, effectiveness evaluation, and the organic integration of future battlefield applications.

[0005] The technical solution of the present invention is: a method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, comprising the following steps:

[0006] (1) Select a type of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft as the target object and collect data on the corresponding advanced layout aircraft, including the layout's appearance characteristics, RCS characteristics, fuselage internal volume, control performance, lift-to-drag ratio under different conditions, and flight altitude;

[0007] (2) Combine the data collection results of advanced layout aircraft to build operational requirements;

[0008] (3) Design combat application scenarios based on the combat requirements;

[0009] (4) Carry out equipment model design based on the data collection results of advanced layout aircraft;

[0010] (5) Using the results of equipment model design, conduct battlefield action design for advanced aircraft configurations;

[0011] (6) Form a set of operational scenarios based on the battlefield action design of advanced aircraft layouts and the corresponding combat application scenarios;

[0012] (7) Using combat scenarios to develop parameter deviations, conduct the first round of large-sample combat simulations;

[0013] (8) Based on the results of the first round of large-scale combat simulations and the comparison of combat losses between the Red and Blue sides, a second round of combat simulations was conducted to form new combat scenarios;

[0014] (9) Based on the designed combat application scenarios and the process and results of the second round of combat simulation, an indicator system is constructed to conduct effectiveness evaluation and analysis;

[0015] (10) Through effectiveness evaluation and analysis, determine aerodynamic parameters, improve equipment models, optimize flight routes, and re-formulate battlefield operations to adjust the new combat scenarios and equipment model parameters in step (8);

[0016] (11) Based on the effectiveness evaluation analysis and the adjusted combat scenario in step (10), a third round of simulation is conducted, and a judgment is made based on the battle damage comparison results. If the battle damage ratio of the new round is higher than the previous battle damage ratio, the process returns to step (10). If the battle damage ratio cannot be improved for multiple consecutive times, a set of equipment parameters for advanced layout aircraft for engineering designers is formed based on the last simulation result.

[0017] Furthermore, the combat application scenario design refers to completing the selection of the combat location based on the three-dimensional map, selecting the position coordinates of the red and blue sides, the specific participating units, and the action rules of the combat units and the rules for the use of strike equipment.

[0018] Furthermore, the equipment model design refers to collecting and packaging data on the flight altitude, speed characteristics, infrared characteristics, stealth performance, load characteristics, damage points, and maneuverability of advanced aircraft.

[0019] Furthermore, the battlefield action design of the advanced layout aircraft refers to combining the flight altitude, speed characteristics, stealth performance, and payload characteristics of the selected advanced layout aircraft, and customizing the flight route in accordance with the blue side's troop deployment, reconnaissance capabilities of major targets, and firepower deployment in specific application scenarios to ensure that the aircraft has a survivability not less than a preset level before arriving at the predetermined action area to carry out fire strikes or detailed inspections.

[0020] Furthermore, step (6) forms a set of operational scenarios, including:

[0021] Using commercial software, the battlefield actions of advanced deployment aircraft are edited and input, the deployment of the red and blue forces is input, and the action rules and strike equipment use rules of the red and blue combat units are edited and input, and the equipment models used are imported to form a set of combat scenarios.

[0022] Furthermore, the parameter deviation is carried out to conduct the first round of large-sample combat simulation deduction, including:

[0023] The positions of the Red and Blue forces' deployment are changed, and a simulation analysis is conducted each time the changes occur. The numbers of the Red and Blue forces' deployment are changed, and a simulation analysis is conducted each time the changes occur. The reconnaissance and strike loads carried by the Red and Blue combat units are changed, and a simulation analysis is conducted each time the changes occur. Ultimately, a large sample of combat simulation is formed, forming a simulation database.

[0024] Furthermore, the second round of combat simulation deduction includes:

[0025] Based on the results of the first round of large-sample combat simulation and deduction, and the simulation and deduction database formed, a comparison of battle damage assessments was carried out. In a series of scenarios for changing the positions of the red and blue force deployments, no more than 5 groups of troop deployment positions were selected based on the optimal battle damage comparison as a screening condition; in a series of scenarios for changing the numbers of the red and blue force deployments, no more than 5 groups of troop deployment numbers were selected based on the optimal battle damage comparison as a screening condition; in a series of scenarios for changing the reconnaissance and strike loads carried by the red and blue combat units, no more than 5 groups of the layout of the loads carried by the combat units of both sides were selected based on the optimal battle damage comparison as a screening condition; all the selected situations were randomly combined, screened using battle damage assessments, and the second round of combat simulation and deductions were carried out to form new combat scenarios.

[0026] Furthermore, the construction of an indicator system for performance evaluation and analysis includes:

[0027] Combined with the process and results of the second round of combat simulation, the battlefield action time of equipment units, the communication quality of the command and control link during the whole combat process, the communication quality of the communication link between combat units during the whole combat process, and the average time of the combat unit killing link were extracted to construct an indicator system. First, multiple experts used the hierarchical analysis method to obtain the ranking vector containing each indicator, and then used expert clustering analysis to obtain the weight of each indicator. According to the obtained indicator weights and ranking vectors, the performance evaluation method was selected to complete the performance evaluation analysis, including ADC method, TOPSIS method, and weighted sum method.

[0028] Furthermore, the above-mentioned analysis and judgment of aerodynamic parameters, improvement of equipment models, optimization of flight routes, and re-formulation of battlefield operations include:

[0029] Through combat simulation deduction and testing, it was found that the combat effectiveness of advanced layout aircraft was low due to the influence of combat radius, so the aerodynamic parameters formed were modified, including lift-to-drag ratio and drag coefficient; the combat radius was directly calculated and solved by combining fuel consumption, high flight speed and speed parameters, and the model parameters in the equipment model library were modified;

[0030] After the combat simulation test, it was found that the reconnaissance radius or accuracy of the advanced layout aircraft combined with the payload was insufficient. The fuselage volume and payload weight were modified to directly calculate the reconnaissance payload or strike payload carried inside, and the model parameters in the equipment model library were modified.

[0031] The equipment model is modified according to the modified aerodynamic parameters, overall parameters, and changes in combined parameters; based on the designers' experience, the flight path of advanced layout aircraft is optimized by changing the flight heading and altitude parameters to re-form battlefield operations.

[0032] The beneficial effects of the present invention compared with the prior art are:

[0033] (1) The present invention condenses and forms a design method for the equipment parameters of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, combining the design and development of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, the aerodynamic design of aerodynamic layout and combat simulation design. This method avoids the phenomenon that in the previous process of advanced aircraft design and development, aerodynamic layout design, overall parameter demonstration and combat simulation, performance evaluation, and combat application scenario design are out of touch. At the same time, with the continuous innovation of aircraft aerodynamic layout, the current status of the original design process of "research needs-comparison of parameters of competing models-formation of overall equipment parameters" has become more and more restrictive. Therefore, a method for combining the design of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft with combat simulation and performance evaluation is formed to form a set of means for forward design of equipment parameters, which provides parametric support for combat simulation and performance evaluation for some advanced aerodynamic layouts and overall parameter indicators, and is conducive to the future implementation of the concept of advanced layout aircraft.

[0034] (2) Compared with the prior art, the present invention innovatively incorporates important influencing factors such as combat scenarios, and conducts quantitative analysis on the future application of advanced layout aircraft in the early stage of design.

[0035] (3) The present invention incorporates performance evaluation based on the characteristics of advanced layout aircraft and the customized combat scenarios, and quantitatively explains the research direction of key aerodynamic parameters of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft.

[0036] (4) The present invention establishes a matching relationship between the characteristic parameters of advanced aerodynamic layout equipment and some indicators in the indicator system, and introduces important parameters of advanced aerodynamic layout into the performance evaluation process, further realizing the tight coupling between the two. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0037] Figure 1 The present invention is a flow chart of a method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft;

[0038] Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the flight mode corresponding to the flight status. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0039] The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments.

[0040] Example 1

[0041] The present invention proposes a method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, such as Figure 1 As shown, the steps are as follows:

[0042] (1) Select a type of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft as the target object and carry out data collection on the corresponding advanced layout aircraft, including the layout's appearance characteristics, RCS characteristics, fuselage internal volume, control performance, lift-to-drag ratio under different conditions, flight altitude, etc.

[0043] (2) Combine the data collection results of advanced layout aircraft to build combat requirements.

[0044] (3) Design combat application scenarios based on the established combat requirements.

[0045] Combat application scenario design refers to the selection of combat locations based on three-dimensional maps, the location coordinates of the red and blue sides, the specific participating units, and the action rules of the combat units and the rules for the use of strike equipment.

[0046] (4) Carry out equipment model design based on the data collection results of advanced layout aircraft.

[0047] Equipment model design refers to the collection and packaging of data on the flight altitude, speed characteristics, infrared characteristics, stealth performance, payload characteristics, damage points, maneuverability, etc. of advanced aircraft.

[0048] (5) Using the results of equipment model design, conduct battlefield action design for advanced aircraft configurations.

[0049] The battlefield action design of advanced-configuration aircraft refers to the combination of the flight altitude, speed characteristics, stealth performance, payload characteristics, etc. of the selected advanced-configuration aircraft, and the customization of the flight route in accordance with the blue force deployment, reconnaissance capabilities of major targets, and firepower deployment in specific application scenarios to ensure that the aircraft has a survivability not less than the preset level before arriving at the predetermined action area to carry out fire strikes or detailed inspections.

[0050] In the detailed design of battlefield operations, the focus should be on describing the flight trajectory of advanced layout aircraft, which includes but is not limited to the take-off and landing of the aircraft, flight route, and flight altitude changes.

[0051] The flight trajectory formed by the advanced layout aircraft has an accuracy of no more than 10 1 Seconds, the time accuracy requirement for combat operations of other equipment is no higher than 10 2 Seconds.

[0052] (6) Form a set of combat scenarios based on the battlefield action design of advanced aircraft layouts and the corresponding combat application scenarios.

[0053] Specifically, commercial software is used to edit and input the battlefield actions of advanced deployment aircraft, complete the input of red and blue force deployment, and edit and input the action rules and strike equipment use rules of the red and blue combat units, import the equipment models used, and form a set of combat scenarios.

[0054] (7) Using combat scenarios, we developed parameter deviations and conducted the first round of large-sample combat simulations.

[0055] According to the operator's experience and analysis, the positions of the red and blue forces are changed, and a simulation analysis is carried out every time the positions are changed; the number of red and blue forces is changed, and a simulation analysis is carried out every time the positions are changed; the important loads carried by the red and blue combat units, namely the reconnaissance load and the strike load, are changed, and a simulation analysis is carried out every time the important loads are changed. Finally, a large sample of combat simulation is formed, and a simulation database is formed.

[0056] (8) Based on the results of the first round of large-sample combat simulations and the comparison of combat losses between the Red and Blue sides, a second round of combat simulations was conducted to form new combat scenarios.

[0057] According to the results of the first round of large-sample combat simulation and the simulation database formed, a comparison of battle damage assessment was carried out. In a series of scenarios for changing the positions of the red and blue forces, no more than 5 groups of force deployment positions were selected based on the best battle damage comparison as a screening condition; in a series of scenarios for changing the number of red and blue forces, no more than 5 groups of force deployment numbers were selected based on the best battle damage comparison as a screening condition; in a series of scenarios for changing the important loads carried by the red and blue combat units, namely the reconnaissance load and the strike load, no more than 5 groups of the layout of the important loads carried by the combat units of both sides were selected based on the best battle damage comparison as a screening condition. All selected situations were randomly combined, screened using battle damage assessment, and the second round of combat simulation was carried out to form new combat scenarios.

[0058] (9) Based on the designed combat application scenarios and the process and results of the second round of combat simulation, an indicator system is constructed to conduct effectiveness evaluation and analysis.

[0059] Specifically include:

[0060] Combined with the process and results of the second round of combat simulation, a series of indicator parameters were extracted, including the battlefield action time of advanced equipment units, the communication quality of the command and control link throughout the combat process, the communication quality of the communication link between combat units throughout the combat process, and the average time of the combat unit kill link. An indicator system was constructed. First, several experts used the hierarchical analysis method to obtain the ranking vector containing each indicator, and then used expert clustering analysis to obtain the weight of each indicator. According to the obtained indicator weights and ranking vectors, the performance evaluation method was selected to complete the performance evaluation analysis.

[0061] Table 1 gives several common performance evaluation methods, and Table 2 gives several typical methods for determining indicator weights.

[0062] Table 1 Several common performance evaluation models

[0063]

[0064] Table 2 Several typical weight determination methods

[0065]

[0066] (10) Through performance evaluation and analysis, determine aerodynamic parameters, improve equipment models, optimize flight routes, and re-formulate battlefield operations to achieve fine-tuning of the new combat scenarios and equipment model parameters in step (8).

[0067] The fine-tuning for the new combat scenario mainly includes: adjusting the flight routes of advanced-layout aircraft, modifying combat regulations and the rules for the use of strike equipment; the fine-tuning for the equipment model parameters mainly includes: modifying the combat radius of advanced-layout aircraft, fuel consumption in various flight states, and RCS.

[0068] Specifically, Figure 2 As shown, the aerodynamic parameters are analyzed, the equipment model is improved, the flight path is optimized, and battlefield operations are re-formed, including:

[0069] For example, through combat simulation tests, it was found that the combat effectiveness of advanced layout aircraft was low due to the influence of the combat radius. The aerodynamic parameters formed can be modified, such as lift-to-drag ratio, drag coefficient and other parameters, combined with fuel consumption, flight high speed, speed and other parameters, to directly calculate and solve the combat radius and modify the model parameters in the equipment model library.

[0070] For example, through combat simulation tests, it is found that the reconnaissance radius or accuracy of the combination of advanced aircraft layout and payload is insufficient (or the cost-effectiveness of our attack on enemy targets is not high). Therefore, the parameters such as the fuselage internal volume and payload weight can be modified, and the reconnaissance payload or strike payload carried inside can be directly calculated and solved, and the model parameters in the equipment model library can be modified.

[0071] In summary, the equipment model is modified according to the modified aerodynamic parameters, overall parameters, and combined parameter changes. According to the experience of the designers, the flight path of the advanced layout aircraft is optimized by changing the flight heading, altitude and other parameters, and its battlefield actions are re-formed.

[0072] Then, in the newly formed combat scenario in step (8), the flight routes and battlefield actions of the advanced aircraft are modified to form a new combat scenario.

[0073] (11) Based on the effectiveness evaluation analysis and the combat scenario formed after adjustment in step (10), a third round of simulation is carried out, and a judgment is made based on the battle damage comparison results. If the battle damage ratio of the new round is higher than that of the previous round, the process returns to step (10). If the battle damage ratio cannot be improved for 7 consecutive times or more, a set of equipment parameters for advanced layout aircraft for engineering designers is formed based on the last simulation result.

[0074] The present invention utilizes Figure 1 The method of forming the design process shown, combined with the corresponding battlefield environment, combat system and a series of combat simulation and deduction, effectiveness evaluation and analysis carried out through the supporting simulation and deduction platform, ultimately forms a set of equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft.

[0075] At the same time, since advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft have strong battlefield application requirements in future battlefields, combat simulation can be used to design combat operations, and a set of indicators that are compatible with it can be constructed. The results of performance evaluation can be used as feedback to correct the combat operation design, and the equipment parameters of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft can be finally formed through multiple iterations. This method is used to complete the forward design process of equipment design of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, which has strong engineering significance.

[0076] This invention conducts in-depth research and analysis, summarizes the equipment characteristics of various types of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, uses new battlefield applications to locate the battlefield functions of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, and extracts the characteristic elements of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft equipment units in combination with the results of simulation deduction. The characteristics and application scenarios of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft equipment units are jointly designed, combined with combat simulation deduction and effectiveness evaluation data, to effectively support the subsequent development direction of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft equipment, key technology refinement, and the development of engineering prototypes.

[0077] Although the present invention has been disclosed as above in the form of a preferred embodiment, it is not intended to limit the present invention. Any person skilled in the art may make possible changes and modifications to the technical solution of the present invention by using the methods and technical contents disclosed above without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Therefore, any simple modifications, equivalent changes and modifications made to the above embodiments based on the technical essence of the present invention without departing from the content of the technical solution of the present invention shall fall within the protection scope of the technical solution of the present invention.

[0078] The contents not described in detail in the specification of the present invention belong to the common knowledge of those skilled in the art.

Claims

1. A method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: (1) Select a type of advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft as the target object and collect data on the corresponding advanced layout aircraft, including the layout's appearance characteristics, RCS characteristics, fuselage internal volume, control performance, lift-to-drag ratio under different conditions, and flight altitude; (2) Combine the data collection results of advanced layout aircraft to build operational requirements; (3) Design combat application scenarios based on the combat requirements; (4) Carry out equipment model design based on the data collection results of advanced layout aircraft; (5) Using the results of equipment model design, conduct battlefield action design for advanced aircraft configurations; (6) Form a set of operational scenarios based on the battlefield action design of advanced aircraft layouts and the corresponding combat application scenarios; (7) Using combat scenarios to develop parameter deviations, conduct the first round of large-sample combat simulations; (8) Based on the results of the first round of large-scale combat simulations and the comparison of combat losses between the Red and Blue sides, a second round of combat simulations was conducted to form new combat scenarios; (9) Based on the designed combat application scenarios and the process and results of the second round of combat simulation, an indicator system is constructed to conduct effectiveness evaluation and analysis; (10) Through effectiveness evaluation and analysis, determine aerodynamic parameters, improve equipment models, optimize flight routes, and re-formulate battlefield operations to adjust the new combat scenarios and equipment model parameters in step (8); (11) Based on the effectiveness evaluation analysis and the adjusted combat scenario in step (10), a third round of simulation is conducted, and a judgment is made based on the battle damage comparison results. If the battle damage ratio of the new round is higher than the previous battle damage ratio, the process returns to step (10). If the battle damage ratio cannot be improved for multiple consecutive times, a set of equipment parameters for advanced layout aircraft for engineering designers is formed based on the last simulation result.

2. The method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic layout aircraft according to claim 1, characterized in that: The combat application scenario design refers to completing the selection of the combat location based on the three-dimensional map, selecting the position coordinates of the red and blue sides, the specific participating units, and the action rules of the combat units and the rules for the use of strike equipment.

3. The method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic configuration aircraft according to claim 1, characterized in that: The equipment model design refers to the collection and packaging of data on the flight altitude, speed characteristics, infrared characteristics, stealth performance, load characteristics, damage points, and maneuverability of advanced aircraft.

4. The method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic configuration aircraft according to claim 1, characterized in that: The battlefield action design of the advanced layout aircraft refers to combining the flight altitude, speed characteristics, stealth performance, and payload characteristics of the selected advanced layout aircraft, and customizing the flight route in accordance with the blue side's troop deployment, reconnaissance capabilities of major targets, and firepower deployment in specific application scenarios to ensure that the aircraft has a survivability not less than the preset level before arriving at the predetermined action area to carry out fire strikes or detailed inspections.

5. The method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic configuration aircraft according to claim 1, characterized in that: Step (6) develop a set of operational scenarios, including: Using commercial software, the battlefield actions of advanced deployment aircraft are edited and input, the deployment of the red and blue forces is input, and the action rules and strike equipment use rules of the red and blue combat units are edited and input, and the equipment models used are imported to form a set of combat scenarios.

6. The method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic configuration aircraft according to claim 1, characterized in that: The above-mentioned parameter deviation and the first round of large-sample combat simulation deduction include: The positions of the Red and Blue forces' deployment are changed, and a simulation analysis is conducted each time the changes occur. The numbers of the Red and Blue forces' deployment are changed, and a simulation analysis is conducted each time the changes occur. The reconnaissance and strike loads carried by the Red and Blue combat units are changed, and a simulation analysis is conducted each time the changes occur. Ultimately, a large sample of combat simulation is formed, forming a simulation database.

7. The method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic configuration aircraft according to claim 6, characterized in that: The second round of combat simulation exercises includes: Based on the results of the first round of large-sample combat simulation and deduction, and the simulation and deduction database formed, a comparison of battle damage assessments was carried out. In a series of scenarios for changing the positions of the red and blue force deployments, no more than 5 groups of troop deployment positions were selected based on the optimal battle damage comparison as a screening condition; in a series of scenarios for changing the numbers of the red and blue force deployments, no more than 5 groups of troop deployment numbers were selected based on the optimal battle damage comparison as a screening condition; in a series of scenarios for changing the reconnaissance and strike loads carried by the red and blue combat units, no more than 5 groups of the layout of the loads carried by the combat units of both sides were selected based on the optimal battle damage comparison as a screening condition; all the selected situations were randomly combined, screened using battle damage assessments, and the second round of combat simulation and deductions were carried out to form new combat scenarios.

8. The method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic configuration aircraft according to claim 1, characterized in that: The construction of the index system for performance evaluation and analysis includes: Combined with the process and results of the second round of combat simulation, the battlefield action time of equipment units, the communication quality of the command and control link during the whole combat process, the communication quality of the communication link between combat units during the whole combat process, and the average time of the combat unit killing link were extracted to construct an indicator system. First, multiple experts used the hierarchical analysis method to obtain the ranking vector containing each indicator, and then used expert clustering analysis to obtain the weight of each indicator. According to the obtained indicator weights and ranking vectors, the performance evaluation method was selected to complete the performance evaluation analysis, including ADC method, TOPSIS method, and weighted sum method.

9. The method for determining equipment parameters for advanced aerodynamic configuration aircraft according to claim 1, characterized in that: The aforementioned analysis of aerodynamic parameters, improvement of equipment models, optimization of flight routes, and re-formation of battlefield operations include: Through combat simulation deduction and testing, it was found that the combat effectiveness of advanced layout aircraft was low due to the influence of combat radius, so the aerodynamic parameters formed were modified, including lift-to-drag ratio and drag coefficient; the combat radius was directly calculated and solved by combining fuel consumption, high flight speed and speed parameters, and the model parameters in the equipment model library were modified; After the combat simulation test, it was found that the reconnaissance radius or accuracy of the advanced layout aircraft combined with the payload was insufficient. The fuselage volume and payload weight were modified to directly calculate the reconnaissance payload or strike payload carried inside, and the model parameters in the equipment model library were modified. The equipment model is modified according to the modified aerodynamic parameters, overall parameters, and changes in combined parameters; based on the designers' experience, the flight path of advanced layout aircraft is optimized by changing the flight heading and altitude parameters to re-form battlefield operations.

Images