Modern communication and geographic information technology-based method applied to factory mobile terminal task issuing and inspection

Abstract

The invention discloses a factory mobile terminal task issuing and polling method based on modern communication and geographic information technologies, and relates to the field of factory mobile terminal task issuing and polling. The problems that in the prior art, task issuing efficiency of front-line operators in the task issuing field is low, and routing inspection work is complex in daily routing inspection work are solved. The method comprises the following steps of: describing a task, namely describing the task by using characters, pictures and voices; selecting task points as self-defined point positions or known point positions; issuing the task to a corresponding front-line operator; the positioning of the task is punched; the operator forwards the task completion condition to an administrator after punching the card, and records the card punching data, time and position of the corresponding point location into a database; the inspection method comprises the following steps: a front-line operator performs card punching on task positioning; and inputting the card punching data, time and position of the corresponding point location into a database to complete inspection. And the method is also suitable for the field of task issuing and inspection for coping with emergencies.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of factory mobile terminal task distribution and inspection technology, and in particular to a method for factory mobile terminal task distribution and inspection based on modern communication and geographic information technology. Background Art

[0002] With the vigorous development of my country's secondary industry, the number and types of equipment and facilities in industrial plants have also increased. In order to meet the daily security and production work in the plant, the number and types of front-line operators responsible for different jobs in the industrial plant have also been continuously increased and improved. The daily inspection of the plant's equipment and facilities and the assignment of tasks to the front-line operators have become particularly important.

[0003] The main problems in the prior art are:

[0004] First, there are the following problems in the area of ​​task distribution:

[0005] 1.1. Tasks are issued with only text descriptions, which is too simple;

[0006] 1.2. There is no historical review of text descriptions, which results in the need to edit similar descriptions again, which can easily lead to task delays;

[0007] 1.3. The description of the target location is heavily based on reference objects;

[0008] 1.4. The target points are all known points and cannot be customized;

[0009] 1.5. After the front-line operator checks the task, the task is not executed due to subjective reasons. The issuing personnel cannot view the time and location when the operator first checked the task.

[0010] Secondly, there are mainly the following problems in daily inspections:

[0011] 2.1. Inspection clock-in has no location positioning, and it is impossible to determine where the front-line operators clock in;

[0012] 2.2. When problems are found during inspection, only text descriptions may be used;

[0013] 2.3. When the inspection plan is deleted or the personnel and locations involved are changed, the inspection clock-in records will be deleted and cannot be viewed.

[0014] In summary, in the field of task issuance in the prior art, front-line operators have low efficiency in issuing tasks and there are problems such as complex inspection work in daily inspection work. Summary of the invention

[0015] The present invention aims to solve the problems in the prior art of low efficiency of task issuance by front-line operators and complex inspection work in daily inspection work.

[0016] In order to make daily inspection work concise and clear and to assign tasks to front-line operators accurately and efficiently, the present invention proposes a method for task assignment and inspection on a mobile terminal in a factory based on modern communication and geographic information technology.

[0017] To solve the above technical problems, the present invention is achieved through the following technical solutions:

[0018] Solution 1: The present invention proposes a method for issuing tasks to a mobile terminal in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology, and the method comprises the following steps:

[0019] S1. Enter the attributes of equipment points and front-line operators into the platform, enter at least one department into the platform, and set the superior-subordinate relationship within the department;

[0020] S2. Set up administrators in each department to formulate inspection plans and issue tasks;

[0021] S3, judging whether the front-line operator is online, and if offline, prompting whether to issue a task, wherein the task includes a task for at least one point;

[0022] S4. Describe the tasks assigned;

[0023] S5. Select the task point for issuing the task as a custom point or a known point;

[0024] S6. Send the task to the front-line operators;

[0025] S7. After the front-line operator clicks for the first time, the time and location of the click are entered into the database;

[0026] S8. Frontline operators clock in for inspection tasks and set a minimum clock-in distance;

[0027] S9. After the front-line operators clock in, the task completion status is forwarded to the administrator, and the clock-in data of the corresponding points and their time and location are entered into the database;

[0028] S10. If the administrator issues a task while the operator is offline, the operator will be prompted that there is an offline task to be completed after the operator comes online again; if the operator completes the task while the administrator is offline, the administrator will be prompted that the corresponding task has been issued after the operator comes online again.

[0029] Furthermore, a preferred implementation is provided, wherein S2 also includes the step of linking the equipment and front-line operators according to the organizational structure.

[0030] Furthermore, a preferred implementation manner is provided, in which the method of describing the task in S4 includes using any one to three combinations of text, pictures and voice to complete the description of the assigned task.

[0031] Furthermore, a preferred implementation is provided, wherein the description of the task to be issued is implemented by sending a form via http protocol using any one to three combinations of text, pictures and voice to complete the description of the task.

[0032] Furthermore, a preferred implementation is provided, in which the task is sent to the front-line operator via the WebSocket protocol in S6.

[0033] Furthermore, a preferred implementation manner is provided, in which the minimum check-in distance for the line operator in S8 to check-in for the positioning of the inspection task is 50 m.

[0034] Solution 2: A method for mobile terminal task inspection in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology, wherein the inspection method is implemented based on the tasks issued in any one of Solution 1, and the inspection method comprises the following steps:

[0035] S11, the front-line operator receives the notification of the task issued as described in claim 1 to conduct an inspection, and locates the position of the front-line operator;

[0036] S21. Frontline operators clock in for the location of the assigned tasks;

[0037] S31, determine whether the current time is within the inspection time range, if it is within the time range, punch in, if it is outside the time range, prompt that it is overdue or time has not arrived;

[0038] S41, determine whether the location is within the range, if it is within the range, then punch in, if it is outside the range, then prompt out of range;

[0039] S51. Enter the punch-in data of the corresponding points and their time and location into the database for administrators to view and front-line operators to back up.

[0040] Solution three: a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements the method described in Solution one for issuing tasks on a mobile terminal in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology.

[0041] Solution 4: A computer device includes a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program. When the processor runs the computer program stored in the memory, the processor executes the method described in Solution 1 for issuing tasks on a mobile terminal in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology.

[0042] Solution 5. A computer program product, as a computer program, when executed, implements the method described in Solution 1 for issuing tasks on a mobile terminal in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology.

[0043] The present invention is beneficial in that:

[0044] The method described in the present invention can also distinguish and enter known equipment points and front-line operators according to their respective departments, so that administrators of different departments can assign tasks to corresponding front-line operators and formulate inspection plans for corresponding points.

[0045] The points in the method described in the present invention can also be intuitively displayed in the form of a directory tree according to their organizational structure, which is convenient for user management.

[0046] In the method described in the present invention, the front-line operators will also be displayed in the form of a directory tree according to their organizational structure, and will be prompted whether their handheld terminals are online and their real-time locations.

[0047] The present invention can accurately and efficiently formulate corresponding inspection plans and issue tasks for handling factory production and security work.

[0048] The present invention is also applicable to the task distribution and inspection fields for responding to emergencies, as well as Java frameworks (Spring, SpringMVC and Mybatis), MySQL databases and communication protocols (WebSocket and http). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0049] Figure 1 Implementation method 1 is a flowchart of a method for issuing tasks to a mobile terminal in a factory based on modern communication and geographic information technology.

[0050] Figure 2 This is a flowchart of task punching in a method for issuing tasks on a mobile terminal in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology as described in Implementation Method 1.

[0051] Figure 3 This is a flow chart of a method for applying modern communication and geographic information technology to mobile terminal task inspection in factory areas as described in Implementation Method Seven. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0052] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the implementation methods of the present application clearer, the technical solutions in the implementation methods of the present application will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the implementation methods of the present application. Obviously, the described implementation methods are only part of the implementation methods of the present application, not all of the implementation methods.

[0053] Implementation method 1: This implementation method provides a method for issuing tasks to a mobile terminal in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology, and the method includes the following steps:

[0054] S1. Enter the attributes of equipment points and front-line operators into the platform, enter at least one department into the platform, and set the superior-subordinate relationship within the department;

[0055] S2. Set up administrators in each department to formulate inspection plans and issue tasks;

[0056] S3, judging whether the front-line operator is online, and if offline, prompting whether to issue a task, wherein the task includes a task for at least one point;

[0057] S4. Describe the tasks assigned;

[0058] S5. Select the task point for issuing the task as a custom point or a known point;

[0059] S6. Send the task to the front-line operators;

[0060] S7. After the front-line operator clicks for the first time, the time and location of the click are entered into the database;

[0061] S8. Frontline operators clock in for inspection tasks and set a minimum clock-in distance;

[0062] S9. After the front-line operators clock in, the task completion status is forwarded to the administrator, and the clock-in data of the corresponding points and their time and location are entered into the database;

[0063] S10. If the administrator issues a task while the operator is offline, the operator will be prompted that there is an offline task to be completed after the operator comes online again; if the operator completes the task while the administrator is offline, the administrator will be prompted that the corresponding task has been issued after the operator comes online again.

[0064] Implementation method 2: This implementation method further limits the method for issuing tasks on the mobile terminal of the factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology as described in implementation method 1. S2 also includes the step of linking equipment and front-line operators according to the organizational structure.

[0065] Implementation method three: This implementation method is a further limitation of the method for issuing mobile inspection tasks in factory areas based on modern communication and geographic information technology as described in implementation method one. The method of describing the task in S4 includes using any one to three combinations of text, pictures and voice to complete the description of the issued task.

[0066] Implementation method four: This implementation method is a further limitation of the method for issuing mobile inspection tasks in factory areas based on modern communication and geographic information technology as described in implementation method three. The described method for issuing tasks is to send a form via the http protocol using any one to three combinations of text, pictures and voice to complete the task description.

[0067] Implementation method five: This implementation method further limits the method for issuing inspection tasks on mobile terminals in factory areas based on modern communication and geographic information technology as described in implementation method one. In S6, the tasks are issued to front-line operators through the WebSocket protocol.

[0068] Implementation method six: This implementation method is a further limitation of the method described in implementation method one for issuing inspection tasks on the mobile terminal of the factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology. The minimum punch-in distance for the line operator to punch in and set the inspection task location in S8 is 50m.

[0069] Implementation method 7: This implementation method proposes a method for mobile terminal task inspection in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology. The inspection method is implemented based on the tasks issued in implementation method 1. The inspection method includes the following steps:

[0070] S11, the front-line operator receives the notification of the task issued as described in claim 1 to conduct an inspection, and locates the position of the front-line operator;

[0071] S21. Frontline operators clock in for the location of the assigned tasks;

[0072] S31, determine whether the current time is within the inspection time range, if it is within the time range, punch in, if it is outside the time range, prompt that it is overdue or time has not arrived;

[0073] S41, determine whether the location is within the range, if it is within the range, then punch in, if it is outside the range, then prompt out of range;

[0074] S51. Enter the punch-in data of the corresponding points and their time and location into the database for administrators to view and front-line operators to back up.

[0075] Embodiment 8: A computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the method described in embodiment 1 is implemented.

[0076] Embodiment 9: A computer device includes a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the processor runs the computer program stored in the memory, the processor executes the method described in embodiment 1.

[0077] Embodiment 10: A computer program product, as a computer program, implements the method described in embodiment 1 when the computer program is executed.

[0078] Implementation eleven: This implementation provides an example, which is used to explain the above implementations one to ten. The specific example is as follows:

[0079] See also Figures 1 to 3 This embodiment is described, wherein Figure 1 In the task distribution process,

[0080] Step 1: Select frontline operators based on specific tasks;

[0081] Step 2: Determine whether the front-line operator is online. If offline, prompt whether to issue the document;

[0082] Step 3: Determine whether the front-line operator has other tasks in progress. If so, prompt whether to issue the task;

[0083] Step 4: Describe the task (text, voice or picture);

[0084] Step 5: Select a known point under administrator privileges;

[0085] Step 6: Select custom points according to your needs;

[0086] Step 7: Send the task to the designated operator.

[0087] In the task delivery for responding to emergencies, this embodiment can use any one to three of text, pictures and voice to send a form through the http protocol, that is, among the three description methods, select any combination of "select one from three", "select two from three" or "select three from three" to describe the task. This method makes the description of the task clearer and more detailed. Moreover, the text description can be edited manually or filtered through the text descriptions in the historical tasks delivered, which improves the editing efficiency of the administrator. In the editing of task points, in addition to using known points, any point can also be set as a custom point for editing. A task delivery supports the mixed editing of known points, known equipment locations and custom points, where the custom points need to be manually selected by the administrator on the map, that is, a task can deliver multiple points, and these points can contain both known points and custom points.

[0088] Frontline operators can use the points on the map, including the latitude and longitude of the equipment with known locations or custom points, to accurately locate the location on the map without any reference. After the operator clicks on the task, the time and location of the first viewing of the task will be recorded to avoid subjective slacking of the operator.

[0089] in, Figure 2 The task clocking-in process for front-line operators described in the document is as follows:

[0090] Step 1: Frontline operators receive the task;

[0091] Step 2: Locate the specific location of the front-line operators;

[0092] Step 3: The frontline operator checks the task details and records the location and time of the first check;

[0093] Step 4: Determine whether the location is within the range. If it is within the range, you can check in. If it is outside the range, it will prompt that it is out of range.

[0094] Step 5: Determine whether the point is a known point or a custom point;

[0095] Step 6: If it is a known point, set it according to the known point. If it is a custom point, set it according to the custom point;

[0096] Step 7: Describe the point (text, voice or picture);

[0097] Step 8: Check in and forward to the corresponding administrator;

[0098] When frontline operators clock in at task points, they can also use any one to three of text, pictures, and voice to describe the completion of the task. In addition, if the mobile terminal signal is unstable and the transmission fails, the clock-in data will not be cleared for secondary transmission. After completing the clock-in, the system will forward the execution status of this task to the administrator and record the clock-in location and time. In addition, if the frontline operator is offline when the administrator issues the task, the task will be temporarily stored. When the person goes online again, he will be prompted that he has an offline task to perform. Similarly, if the operator completes the task while the administrator is offline, the administrator will be prompted that the corresponding task has been completed when he goes online again.

[0099] Figure 3 This is the inspection and clocking-in process for front-line operators described in this implementation mode. The specific process is as follows:

[0100] Step 1: Frontline operators receive inspection requests;

[0101] Step 2: Locate the specific location of the front-line operators;

[0102] Step 3: Determine whether the current time is within the inspection time range. If it is within the range, you can clock in. If it is outside the range, it will indicate that the time has expired or the time has not arrived.

[0103] Step 4: Determine whether the location is within the range. If it is within the range, you can check in. If it is outside the range, it will prompt that it is out of range.

[0104] Step 5: Describe the point, wherein the description method is any combination of text, voice or picture;

[0105] Step 6: Check in.

[0106] In daily inspections, this implementation method sets the time range of the inspection on the basis of setting the inspection plan name, inspection points and inspection personnel, that is, the clock-in time shall not be earlier than the start time and later than the end time, and the clock-in outside the specified time range shall be invalid. In addition, the inspection cycle can be set to only once or every day to meet temporary inspection needs. When the front-line operators clock in at the inspection points, they can also use any one to three methods of text, pictures and voice to describe the completion of the inspection. After completing the clock-in, the system will record the clock-in location and time. If the inspection plan is deleted, the database will set the plan to the deleted state, and will not actually delete the inspection plan, so as to facilitate the query of the clock-in record of the inspection in the future. All clock-in behaviors of the front-line operators need to be carried out within the minimum clock-in distance set by the system. The clock-in distance needs to be set by the administrator according to actual needs. The system defaults to 50m. Otherwise, the clock-in fails.

[0107] Figures 1 to 3Any process or method description in the flowchart described in or otherwise described herein can be understood as representing a module, fragment or portion of a code including one or more executable instructions for implementing the steps of a custom logic function or process, and the scope of the preferred embodiment of the present invention includes other implementations, in which the functions may be performed in a substantially simultaneous manner or in a reverse order according to the functions involved, which should be understood by a person skilled in the art of the present invention. The logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein illustrate the possible implementation architecture, functions and operations of the apparatus and methods according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. In this regard, each box in the flowchart or block diagram can represent a module, a program segment, or a part of a code, and the above-mentioned module, program segment, or a part of a code contains one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logic function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions marked in the box can also occur in an order different from that marked in the accompanying drawings. For example, two boxes represented in succession can actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they can sometimes be executed in reverse order, depending on the functions involved. It is also noted that each block in the block diagram or flowchart, and combinations of blocks in the block diagram or flowchart, may be implemented by a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified functions or operations, or may be implemented by a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions. For example, what may be considered as an ordered list of executable instructions for implementing a logical function may be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device (such as a computer-based system, a system including a processor, or other system that can fetch instructions from and execute instructions in an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device).

[0108] For the purposes of the present specification, "computer-readable medium" may be any device that can contain, store, communicate, propagate or transmit a program for use with an instruction execution system, device or equipment or in conjunction with these instruction execution systems, devices or equipment. More specific examples of computer-readable media (non-exhaustive list) include the following: an electrical connection with one or N wirings (electronic device), a portable computer disk box (magnetic device), a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable and editable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber device, and a portable compact disk read-only memory (CDROM). In addition, the computer-readable medium may even be paper or other suitable medium on which the program may be printed, because the program may be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other medium, followed by editing, interpreting or processing in other suitable ways as necessary, and then stored in a computer memory. It should be understood that the various parts of the present invention may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, the N steps or methods may be implemented in software or firmware stored in a memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented in hardware, as in another embodiment, it can be implemented using any one of the following technologies known in the art or a combination thereof: a discrete logic circuit having a logic gate circuit for implementing a logic function on a data signal, a dedicated integrated circuit having a suitable combination of logic gate circuits, a programmable gate array (PGA), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), etc.

[0109] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the above are only preferred embodiments of the present invention, and the various embodiments of the present disclosure and / or the features described in the claims may be combined or combined in various ways, even if such combinations or combinations are not explicitly described in the present disclosure. It is not intended to limit the present invention. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art may still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or perform equivalent substitutions on some of the technical features therein. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and principles of the present invention shall be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

[0110] Although preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described, additional changes and modifications may be made to these embodiments by those skilled in the art once the basic inventive concepts are known. Therefore, the appended claims are intended to be interpreted as including the preferred embodiments and all changes and modifications that fall within the scope of the present invention. Obviously, those skilled in the art may make various changes and modifications to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, if these modifications and variations of the present invention fall within the scope of the claims of the present invention and their equivalents, the present invention is also intended to include these modifications and variations.

Claims

1. A method for issuing tasks to a mobile terminal in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology, characterized in that: The method comprises the following steps: S1. Enter the attributes of equipment points and front-line operators into the platform, enter at least one department into the platform, and set the superior-subordinate relationship within the department; S2. Set up administrators in each department to formulate inspection plans and issue tasks; S3, judging whether the front-line operator is online, and if offline, prompting whether to issue a task, wherein the task includes a task for at least one point; S4. Describe the tasks assigned; S5. Select the task point for issuing the task as a custom point or a known point; S6. Send the task to the front-line operators; S7. After the front-line operator clicks for the first time, the time and location of the click are entered into the database; S8. Frontline operators clock in for inspection tasks and set a minimum clock-in distance; S9. After the front-line operators clock in, the task completion status is forwarded to the administrator, and the clock-in data of the corresponding points and their time and location are entered into the database; S10. If the administrator issues a task while the operator is offline, the operator will be prompted that there is an offline task to be completed after the operator comes online again; if the operator completes the task while the administrator is offline, the administrator will be prompted that the corresponding task has been issued after the operator comes online again.

2. The method for issuing inspection tasks on a mobile terminal in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology according to claim 1 is characterized in that: S2 also includes the steps of linking equipment and front-line operators according to the organizational structure.

3. The method for issuing inspection tasks on a mobile terminal in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The method of describing the task in S4 includes using any one to three combinations of text, pictures and voice to complete the description of the assigned task.

4. The method for issuing inspection tasks on a mobile terminal in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology according to claim 3 is characterized in that: The method of describing the task to be issued is to send a form through the http protocol and use any one to three combinations of text, pictures and voice to complete the description of the task.

5. The method for issuing inspection tasks on a mobile terminal in a factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology according to claim 1 is characterized in that: In S6, tasks are sent to front-line operators through the WebSocket protocol.

6. According to the method for issuing mobile terminal inspection tasks in factory areas based on modern communication and geographic information technology as described in claim 1, the minimum punch-in distance for the line operator in S8 to punch in and set the positioning of the inspection task is 50m.

7. A method for mobile terminal task inspection in factory area based on modern communication and geographic information technology, characterized in that: The inspection method is implemented based on the task issued according to any one of claims 1 to 6, and the inspection method comprises the following steps: S11, the front-line operator receives the notification of the task issued as described in claim 1 to conduct an inspection, and locates the position of the front-line operator; S21. Frontline operators clock in for the location of the assigned tasks; S31, determine whether the current time is within the inspection time range, if it is within the time range, punch in, if it is outside the time range, prompt that it is overdue or time has not arrived; S41, determine whether the location is within the range, if it is within the range, then punch in, if it is outside the range, then prompt out of range; S51. Enter the punch-in data of the corresponding points and their time and location into the database for administrators to view and front-line operators to back up.

8. A computer storage medium for storing a computer program, characterized in that: When the computer program is read by a computer, the computer executes the method described in claim 1.

9. A computer device comprising a processor and a storage medium, characterized in that A computer program is stored in the memory. When the processor runs the computer program stored in the memory, the processor implements the method described in claim 1.

10. A computer program product, in which a computer program is embedded, characterized in that When the computer program is read, the method described in claim 1 is implemented.

Images