Index analysis method and system for electric power communication evaluation
By constructing the index set of power communication evaluation and calculating real-time communication scores and regulatory indicators, the problems of data redundancy, poor real-time and insufficient evaluation of power communication evaluation in the existing technology are solved, and real-time comprehensive supervision of power communication and Effectively narrow the scope of the problem's source.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411532321.6
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-10-30
- Publication Date
- 2025-02-18
Smart Images

Figure CN119477063A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of communication evaluation, and specifically to an indicator analysis method and system for power communication evaluation. Background Art
[0002] As an important basis for the normal operation of the power system, the evaluation of power communication is conducive to the effective supervision of power itself and also helps to maintain the normal operation of the power system. Therefore, it is necessary to study how to effectively evaluate power communication.
[0003] In the prior art, facing a huge power communication system, various parameters in the process are often used to evaluate the power communication. However, the inventors found the following problems during the actual research process:
[0004] 1. There are too many types of parameters, and it is impossible to determine their impact on power communication during data analysis, resulting in data redundancy.
[0005] 2. The existing algorithms or models for evaluating the impact of parameters on power communication are too complex. Faced with the massive amount of data generated by the huge power communication system, the processing is too complicated, resulting in poor real-time evaluation.
[0006] 3. When trying to comprehensively evaluate power communications, most of the data is based on a single parameter or a combination of several parameters, which results in a less comprehensive evaluation.
[0007] 4. When problems are found in power communication, it is impossible to narrow down the source of the problem without collecting a large number of parameters.
[0008] In summary, the existing technology urgently needs a technical solution for indicator analysis for power communication evaluation. Summary of the invention
[0009] The purpose of this application is to provide an indicator analysis method and system for power communication evaluation to solve the technical problems raised in the above background technology.
[0010] To achieve the above objectives, this application discloses the following technical solutions:
[0011] In a first aspect, the present application discloses an index analysis method for power communication evaluation, the method comprising:
[0012] S1: construct an indicator set for power communication evaluation, wherein the indicator set includes reliability indicators and reliability scores, transmission performance indicators and transmission performance scores, security indicators and security scores, and network performance indicators and network performance scores;
[0013] S2: Preset the power communication evaluation cycle and obtain the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set;
[0014] S3: using the real-time indicator set to obtain a real-time communication score for evaluating power communication, and determining whether the real-time communication score is greater than or equal to a preset communication score threshold, if yes, executing step S4, otherwise repeating steps S2 and S3;
[0015] S4: Combining the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set to obtain a supervision indicator, wherein the supervision indicator is used to guide the maintenance of power communication.
[0016] Preferably, the process of constructing an indicator set for power communication evaluation specifically includes the following steps:
[0017] A1: Select the quantified reliability index based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding reliability score;
[0018] A2: Selecting the quantified transmission performance index based on the actual power communication network and obtaining a corresponding transmission performance score;
[0019] A3: Selecting the quantified security index based on the actual power communication network and obtaining a corresponding security score;
[0020] A4: Select the quantified network performance indicator based on the actual power communication network, and obtain the corresponding network performance score.
[0021] Preferably, the step of obtaining the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set specifically comprises the following steps:
[0022] B1: Based on the power communication evaluation cycle and time series, collect data corresponding to the indicator set;
[0023] B2: Process the data collected in step B1 to obtain the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set.
[0024] Preferably, it is characterized in that the use of the real-time indicator set to obtain a real-time communication score for evaluating power communication specifically includes:
[0025] The real-time communication score is calculated using a communication score formula, wherein the communication score formula is specifically:
[0026]
[0027] Among them, Re now The reliability score of the current power communication assessment cycle, Tr now Score the transmission performance of the current power communication evaluation cycle, Se nowTo score the security of the current power communication assessment cycle, Ne now Scoring the network performance for the current power communication evaluation cycle, CS now The real-time communication is scored and the real-time communication score is proportional to the quality of the power communication.
[0028] Preferably, the step of combining the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set to obtain the supervision indicator specifically includes:
[0029] The regulatory indicator is calculated using a regulatory indicator screening formula, wherein the regulatory indicator screening formula is specifically:
[0030]
[0031] Among them, Re his Reliability score for the last power communication assessment cycle, Tr his Score the transmission performance of the last power communication evaluation cycle, Se his Score the security of the last power communication assessment cycle, Ne his is the network performance score of the previous power communication evaluation cycle, || is the absolute value operator, max is the maximum value operator, SuI is the regulatory indicator and specifically is the indicator corresponding to the numerator and denominator of the screened maximum value.
[0032] In a second aspect, the present application discloses an index analysis system for power communication evaluation, the system is applicable to the index analysis method for power communication evaluation as described above, and the system comprises:
[0033] An indicator set construction module, wherein the indicator set construction module is configured to: construct an indicator set for power communication evaluation, wherein the indicator set includes reliability indicators and reliability scores, transmission performance indicators and transmission performance scores, security indicators and security scores, and network performance indicators and network performance scores;
[0034] An indicator set acquisition module, wherein the indicator set acquisition module is configured to: preset a power communication evaluation cycle, and acquire a historical indicator set and a real-time indicator set;
[0035] A communication score calculation module, wherein the communication score calculation module is configured to: obtain a real-time communication score for evaluating power communication using the real-time indicator set, determine whether the real-time communication score is greater than or equal to a preset communication score threshold, and if so, run a regulatory indicator screening module, otherwise, repeatedly run the indicator set acquisition module and the communication score calculation module;
[0036] A supervision indicator screening module, wherein the supervision indicator screening module is configured to: obtain supervision indicators by combining the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set, wherein the supervision indicators are used to guide the maintenance of power communications.
[0037] Preferably, the process of constructing an indicator set for power communication evaluation specifically includes the following steps:
[0038] A1: Select the quantified reliability index based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding reliability score;
[0039] A2: Selecting the quantified transmission performance index based on the actual power communication network and obtaining a corresponding transmission performance score;
[0040] A3: Selecting the quantified security index based on the actual power communication network and obtaining a corresponding security score;
[0041] A4: Select the quantified network performance indicator based on the actual power communication network, and obtain the corresponding network performance score.
[0042] Preferably, the acquisition of the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set specifically includes the following steps:
[0043] B1: Based on the power communication evaluation cycle and time series, collect data corresponding to the indicator set;
[0044] B2: Process the data collected in step B1 to obtain the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set.
[0045] Preferably, the step of obtaining a real-time communication score for evaluating power communication by using the real-time indicator set specifically includes:
[0046] The real-time communication score is calculated using a communication score formula, wherein the communication score formula is specifically:
[0047]
[0048] Among them, Re now The reliability score of the current power communication assessment cycle, Tr now Score the transmission performance of the current power communication evaluation cycle, Se now To score the security of the current power communication assessment cycle, Ne now Scoring the network performance for the current power communication evaluation cycle, CS now The real-time communication is scored and the real-time communication score is proportional to the quality of the power communication.
[0049] Preferably, the combining of the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set to obtain the regulatory indicator specifically includes:
[0050] The regulatory indicator is calculated using a regulatory indicator screening formula, wherein the regulatory indicator screening formula is specifically:
[0051]
[0052] Among them, Re his Reliability score for the last power communication assessment cycle, Tr his Score the transmission performance of the last power communication evaluation cycle, Se his Score the security of the last power communication assessment cycle, Ne his is the network performance score of the previous power communication evaluation cycle, || is the absolute value operator, max is the maximum value operator, SuI is the regulatory indicator and specifically is the indicator corresponding to the numerator and denominator of the screened maximum value.
[0053] Beneficial effect: The indicator analysis method and system for power communication evaluation of the present application realize the effective integration of complex parameter data by constructing an indicator data set, and combine the obtained historical indicator set and real-time indicator set to provide an indirect and reasonable data basis for power communication evaluation, thereby reducing the redundancy of data, and realizing real-time and comprehensive supervision of power communication by reducing the amount of calculation and optimizing the calculation of real-time communication scores, thereby improving the real-time and comprehensiveness of power communication evaluation, and screening supervision indicators to narrow the source scope of the problem, thereby realizing indicator analysis for power communication evaluation. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0054] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative work.
[0055] Figure 1 A flowchart of an indicator analysis method for power communication evaluation provided in an embodiment of the present application;
[0056] Figure 2 A structural block diagram of an indicator analysis system for power communication evaluation provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0057] The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application are described clearly and completely below. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present application, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present application.
[0058] In this article, the term "comprising" is intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, method, article or device including a series of elements includes not only those elements, but also includes other elements not explicitly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, article or device. In the absence of more restrictions, the elements defined by the sentence "comprising..." do not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, article or device including the elements.
[0059] In a first aspect, this embodiment discloses Figure 1 An indicator analysis method for power communication evaluation is shown, the method comprising:
[0060] S1: Construct an indicator set for power communication evaluation, which includes reliability indicators and reliability scores, transmission performance indicators and transmission performance scores, security indicators and security scores, and network performance indicators and network performance scores.
[0061] S2: Preset the power communication evaluation cycle and obtain the historical indicator set and real-time indicator set.
[0062] S3: using the real-time indicator set to obtain a real-time communication score for evaluating power communication, and determining whether the real-time communication score is greater than or equal to a preset communication score threshold, if yes, executing step S4, otherwise repeating steps S2 and S3.
[0063] S4: The historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set are combined to obtain the supervision indicator, which is used to guide the maintenance of power communication.
[0064] Specifically, the process of constructing an indicator set for power communication evaluation includes the following steps:
[0065] A1: Select quantified reliability indicators based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding reliability scores.
[0066] A2: Select quantified transmission performance indicators based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding transmission performance scores.
[0067] A3: Select quantified security indicators based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding security scores.
[0068] A4: Select quantified network performance indicators based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding network performance scores.
[0069] It should be noted that the data processing method used in the process of constructing the indicator set in this embodiment is any one of the existing data processing methods, which is intended to achieve quantification of each indicator, and the scoring rule used is any one of the scoring rules known to those skilled in the art, which is intended to achieve that the score is proportional to the corresponding performance. This embodiment realizes the effective integration of multiple parameters in the prior art by constructing an indicator set, reduces the amount of data, and provides a concise and reasonable data basis for calculating the real-time communication score through the corresponding score.
[0070] Specifically, it is characterized in that obtaining the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set specifically includes the following steps:
[0071] B1: Based on the power communication evaluation cycle and time series, collect data corresponding to the indicator set.
[0072] B2: Process the data collected in step B1 to obtain a historical indicator set and a real-time indicator set.
[0073] Specifically, it is characterized in that the real-time indicator set is used to obtain a real-time communication score for evaluating power communication, which specifically includes:
[0074] The real-time communication score is calculated using the communication score formula, where the communication score formula is specifically:
[0075]
[0076] Among them, Re now The reliability score of the current power communication assessment cycle, Tr now Score the transmission performance of the current power communication evaluation cycle, Se now To score the security of the current power communication assessment cycle, Ne now Scoring the network performance for the current power communication evaluation cycle, CS now The real-time communication is scored and the real-time communication score is proportional to the quality of the power communication.
[0077] This embodiment optimizes the calculation of real-time communication scores by constructing ratios between scores corresponding to various indicators. While simplifying the amount of calculation, the influence between various indicators is characterized by various ratios, thereby achieving a comprehensive and real-time power communication evaluation.
[0078] Specifically, it is characterized in that the supervision indicators are obtained by combining the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set, which specifically include:
[0079] The regulatory indicators are calculated using the regulatory indicator screening formula, where the regulatory indicator screening formula is specifically:
[0080]
[0081] Among them, Re his Reliability score for the last power communication assessment cycle, Tr his Score the transmission performance of the last power communication evaluation cycle, Se his Score the security of the last power communication assessment cycle, Ne his is the network performance score of the previous power communication evaluation cycle, || is the absolute value operator, max is the maximum value operator, SuI is the regulatory indicator and specifically is the indicator corresponding to the numerator and denominator of the screened maximum value.
[0082] In this embodiment, the absolute value of the difference between the score corresponding to the historical indicator set and the score corresponding to the real-time indicator set is used to represent the impact of the indicator change in the power communication evaluation cycle. Furthermore, the ratio of the absolute value of the corresponding difference to the score corresponding to the real-time indicator set is used to represent the impact of the indicator change on the score corresponding to the real-time indicator set, thereby achieving comprehensive and real-time targeted analysis of power communication evaluation, and combining with the maximum value operation to achieve the reduction of the scope of the source of the problem, and avoiding the limitations of reducing the scope of the source of the problem based on the consideration of the original multiple indicators.
[0083] In a second aspect, this embodiment discloses Figure 2 An index analysis system for power communication evaluation is shown, the system is applicable to the index analysis method for power communication evaluation as described above, and the system includes:
[0084] The indicator set construction module is configured to: construct an indicator set for power communication evaluation, the indicator set includes reliability indicators and reliability scores, transmission performance indicators and transmission performance scores, security indicators and security scores, and network performance indicators and network performance scores.
[0085] The indicator set acquisition module is configured to: preset a power communication evaluation cycle, and acquire a historical indicator set and a real-time indicator set.
[0086] The communication score calculation module is configured as follows: using the real-time indicator set to obtain a real-time communication score for evaluating power communication, determining whether the real-time communication score is greater than or equal to a preset communication score threshold, and if so, running the regulatory indicator screening module; otherwise, repeatedly running the indicator set acquisition module and the communication score calculation module.
[0087] The supervision indicator screening module is configured to obtain supervision indicators by combining the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set. The supervision indicators are used to guide the maintenance of power communications.
[0088] It should be noted that the indicator analysis system for power communication evaluation of this embodiment corresponds to the indicator analysis method for power communication evaluation mentioned above. Therefore, the contents not specifically described in the indicator analysis system for power communication evaluation of this embodiment may include but are not limited to the functional definition, working principle and technical effect, which are the same as those of the indicator analysis method for power communication evaluation mentioned above, and this text will not elaborate on them here.
[0089] Specifically, the process of constructing an indicator set for power communication evaluation includes the following steps:
[0090] A1: Select quantified reliability indicators based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding reliability scores.
[0091] A2: Select quantified transmission performance indicators based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding transmission performance scores.
[0092] A3: Select quantified security indicators based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding security scores.
[0093] A4: Select quantified network performance indicators based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding network performance scores.
[0094] Specifically, obtaining the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set includes the following steps:
[0095] B1: Based on the power communication evaluation cycle and time series, collect data corresponding to the indicator set.
[0096] B2: Process the data collected in step B1 to obtain a historical indicator set and a real-time indicator set.
[0097] Specifically, the real-time indicator set is used to obtain the real-time communication score for evaluating power communication, including:
[0098] The real-time communication score is calculated using the communication score formula, where the communication score formula is specifically:
[0099]
[0100] Among them, Re now The reliability score of the current power communication assessment cycle, Tr now Score the transmission performance of the current power communication evaluation cycle, Se now To score the security of the current power communication assessment cycle, Nenow Scoring the network performance for the current power communication evaluation cycle, CS now The real-time communication is scored and the real-time communication score is proportional to the quality of the power communication.
[0101] Specifically, the regulatory indicators are obtained by combining the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set, including:
[0102] The regulatory indicators are calculated using the regulatory indicator screening formula, where the regulatory indicator screening formula is specifically:
[0103]
[0104] Among them, Re his Reliability score for the last power communication assessment cycle, Tr his Score the transmission performance of the last power communication evaluation cycle, Se his Score the security of the last power communication assessment cycle, Ne his is the network performance score of the previous power communication evaluation cycle, || is the absolute value operator, max is the maximum value operator, SuI is the regulatory indicator and specifically is the indicator corresponding to the numerator and denominator of the screened maximum value.
[0105] In summary, the indicator analysis method and system for power communication evaluation in this embodiment realizes the effective integration of complex parameter data by constructing an indicator data set, and combines the obtained historical indicator set and real-time indicator set to provide an indirect and reasonable data basis for power communication evaluation, thereby reducing the redundancy of data, and realizing real-time and comprehensive supervision of power communication by reducing the amount of calculation and optimizing the calculation of real-time communication scores, thereby improving the real-time and comprehensiveness of power communication evaluation, and screening supervision indicators to narrow the source scope of the problem, thereby realizing indicator analysis for power communication evaluation.
[0106] In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the embodiments described herein can be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, middleware, code or any appropriate combination thereof. For hardware implementation, the processor can be implemented in one or more of the following units: application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), digital signal processor (DSP), digital signal processing device (DSPD), programmable logic device (PLD), field programmable gate array (FPGA), processor, controller, microcontroller, microprocessor, other electronic units designed to implement the functions described herein or their combination. For software implementation, part or all of the flow of the embodiment can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program. When implemented, the above program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium or transmitted as one or more instructions or codes on a computer-readable storage medium. Computer-readable storage media include computer storage media and communication media, wherein the communication medium includes any medium that is convenient for transmitting a computer program from one place to another. The storage medium can be any available medium that a computer can access. The computer-readable storage medium can include but is not limited to RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, disk storage medium or other magnetic storage device, or any other medium that can be used to carry or store the desired program code in the form of an instruction or data structure and can be accessed by a computer.
[0107] Finally, it should be noted that the above is only a preferred embodiment of the present application and is not intended to limit the present application. Although the present application has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, it is still possible for those skilled in the art to modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments or to make equivalent substitutions for some of the technical features therein. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and principles of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.
Claims
1. An index analysis method for power communication evaluation, characterized in that: The method includes: S1: construct an indicator set for power communication evaluation, wherein the indicator set includes reliability indicators and reliability scores, transmission performance indicators and transmission performance scores, security indicators and security scores, and network performance indicators and network performance scores; S2: Preset the power communication evaluation cycle and obtain the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set; S3: using the real-time indicator set to obtain a real-time communication score for evaluating power communication, and determining whether the real-time communication score is greater than or equal to a preset communication score threshold, if yes, executing step S4, otherwise repeating steps S2 and S3; S4: Combining the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set to obtain a supervision indicator, wherein the supervision indicator is used to guide the maintenance of power communication.
2. The index analysis method for power communication evaluation according to claim 1, characterized in that: The process of constructing an indicator set for power communication evaluation specifically includes the following steps: A1: Select the quantified reliability index based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding reliability score; A2: Selecting the quantified transmission performance index based on the actual power communication network and obtaining a corresponding transmission performance score; A3: Selecting the quantified security index based on the actual power communication network and obtaining a corresponding security score; A4: Select the quantified network performance indicator based on the actual power communication network, and obtain the corresponding network performance score.
3. The index analysis method for power communication evaluation according to claim 1, characterized in that: The acquisition of the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set specifically includes the following steps: B1: Based on the power communication evaluation cycle and time series, collect data corresponding to the indicator set; B2: Process the data collected in step B1 to obtain the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set.
4. The index analysis method for power communication evaluation according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method of obtaining a real-time communication score for evaluating power communication by using the real-time indicator set specifically includes: The real-time communication score is calculated using a communication score formula, wherein the communication score formula is specifically: Among them, Re now The reliability score of the current power communication assessment cycle, Tr now Score the transmission performance of the current power communication evaluation cycle, Se now To score the security of the current power communication assessment cycle, Ne now Scoring the network performance for the current power communication evaluation cycle, CS now The real-time communication is scored and the real-time communication score is proportional to the quality of the power communication.
5. The index analysis method for power communication evaluation according to claim 4, characterized in that: The combining of the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set to obtain the regulatory indicator specifically includes: The regulatory indicator is calculated using a regulatory indicator screening formula, wherein the regulatory indicator screening formula is specifically: Among them, Re his Reliability score for the last power communication assessment cycle, Tr his Score the transmission performance of the last power communication evaluation cycle, Se his Score the security of the last power communication assessment cycle, Ne his is the network performance score of the previous power communication evaluation cycle, is the absolute value operator, max is the maximum value operator, SuI is the regulatory indicator and specifically is the indicator corresponding to the numerator and denominator of the screened maximum value respectively.
6. An index analysis system for power communication evaluation, the system being applicable to the index analysis method for power communication evaluation as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that: The system includes: An indicator set construction module, wherein the indicator set construction module is configured to: construct an indicator set for power communication evaluation, wherein the indicator set includes reliability indicators and reliability scores, transmission performance indicators and transmission performance scores, security indicators and security scores, and network performance indicators and network performance scores; An indicator set acquisition module, wherein the indicator set acquisition module is configured to: preset a power communication evaluation cycle, and acquire a historical indicator set and a real-time indicator set; A communication score calculation module, wherein the communication score calculation module is configured to: obtain a real-time communication score for evaluating power communication using the real-time indicator set, determine whether the real-time communication score is greater than or equal to a preset communication score threshold, and if so, run a regulatory indicator screening module, otherwise, repeatedly run the indicator set acquisition module and the communication score calculation module; A supervision indicator screening module, wherein the supervision indicator screening module is configured to: obtain supervision indicators by combining the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set, wherein the supervision indicators are used to guide the maintenance of power communications.
7. The index analysis system for power communication evaluation according to claim 6, characterized in that: The process of constructing an indicator set for power communication evaluation specifically includes the following steps: A1: Select the quantified reliability index based on the actual power communication network and obtain the corresponding reliability score; A2: Selecting the quantified transmission performance index based on the actual power communication network and obtaining a corresponding transmission performance score; A3: Selecting the quantified security index based on the actual power communication network and obtaining a corresponding security score; A4: Select the quantified network performance indicator based on the actual power communication network, and obtain the corresponding network performance score.
8. The index analysis system for power communication evaluation according to claim 6, characterized in that: The acquisition of the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set specifically includes the following steps: B1: Based on the power communication evaluation cycle and time series, collect data corresponding to the indicator set; B2: Process the data collected in step B1 to obtain the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set.
9. The index analysis system for power communication evaluation according to claim 6, characterized in that: The method of obtaining a real-time communication score for evaluating power communication by using the real-time indicator set specifically includes: The real-time communication score is calculated using a communication score formula, wherein the communication score formula is specifically: Among them, Re now The reliability score of the current power communication assessment cycle, Tr now Score the transmission performance of the current power communication evaluation cycle, Se now To score the security of the current power communication assessment cycle, Ne now Scoring the network performance for the current power communication evaluation cycle, CS now The real-time communication is scored and the real-time communication score is proportional to the quality of the power communication.
10. The index analysis system for power communication evaluation according to claim 9, characterized in that: The combining of the historical indicator set and the real-time indicator set to obtain the regulatory indicator specifically includes: The regulatory indicator is calculated using a regulatory indicator screening formula, wherein the regulatory indicator screening formula is specifically: Among them, Re his Reliability score for the last power communication assessment cycle, Tr his Score the transmission performance of the last power communication evaluation cycle, Se his Score the security of the last power communication assessment cycle, Ne his is the network performance score of the previous power communication evaluation cycle, is the absolute value operator, max is the maximum value operator, SuI is the regulatory indicator and specifically is the indicator corresponding to the numerator and denominator of the screened maximum value respectively.
