Method and device for evaluating rationality of return-bid price

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of engineering cost, and provides a method and a device for evaluating rationality of a return-bid price. The method comprises the following steps: calculating the total cost required for completing a target project and the cost of each object; obtaining the current return price of various objects given by a target party bearing the target project, the current return total price of the target project and the last round of return total price; calculating the price deviation rate of each object according to the calculation cost of each object and the current return price; a total price deviation rate is calculated according to the calculation total cost and the current remarking total price; calculating a return mark change rate according to the current return mark total price and the last round of return mark total price; and determining a return price evaluation score of the target party based on the total price deviation rate, the return change rate and the price deviation rates of the various objects. By adopting the technical means, the problems of single evaluation angle of the rationality of the backmarking price, incapability of ensuring the accuracy of an analysis result and the like in the prior art are solved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of engineering cost, and in particular to a method and device for evaluating the rationality of a return bid price. Background Art

[0002] During the bidding process, construction projects need to conduct bid price clarification and evaluate the rationality of suppliers' bid prices, including whether there are significant abnormalities in the bid prices, whether there are unbalanced quotations, whether the quotations are reasonable or whether they meet the expectations of the tenderer, etc. The existing technology mainly refers to historical bid prices combined with manual experience to evaluate the rationality of suppliers' bid prices in bid clarification. The analysis angle of the rationality of suppliers' bid prices is not comprehensive, and the accuracy of the analysis results cannot be guaranteed. Summary of the invention

[0003] In view of this, the embodiments of the present application provide a method, device, electronic device and computer-readable storage medium for evaluating the rationality of a return bid price, so as to solve the problems in the prior art that the evaluation angle of the rationality of the return bid price is single and the accuracy of the analysis results cannot be guaranteed.

[0004] In a first aspect of an embodiment of the present application, a method for evaluating the rationality of a return bid price is provided, including: calculating the total calculated cost required to complete a target project and the calculated costs of various objects; obtaining the current return bid prices of various objects given by the target party undertaking the target project, as well as the current total return bid price of the target project and the total return bid price of the previous round; calculating the price deviation rate of various objects based on the calculated costs of various objects and the current return bid price; calculating the total price deviation rate based on the calculated total cost and the current total return bid price; calculating the return bid change rate based on the current total return bid price and the total return bid price of the previous round; and determining the return bid price evaluation score of the target party based on the total price deviation rate, the return bid change rate and the price deviation rate of various objects.

[0005] According to a second aspect of an embodiment of the present application, there is provided a device for evaluating the rationality of a return bid price, including: a first calculation module, configured to calculate the total cost of the proposed method required to complete a target project and the proposed costs of various objects; an acquisition module, configured to obtain the current return bid prices of various objects given by the target party undertaking the target project, as well as the current total return bid price of the target project and the total return bid price of the previous round; a second calculation module, configured to calculate the price deviation rate of various objects based on the proposed costs of various objects and the current return bid price; a third calculation module, configured to calculate the total price deviation rate based on the total cost of the proposed method and the current total return bid price; a fourth calculation module, configured to calculate the return bid change rate based on the current total return bid price and the total return bid price of the previous round; a determination module, configured to determine the return bid price evaluation score of the target party based on the total price deviation rate, the return bid change rate and the price deviation rate of various objects.

[0006] According to a third aspect of an embodiment of the present application, an electronic device is provided, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the steps of the above method when executing the computer program.

[0007] According to a fourth aspect of an embodiment of the present application, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, which stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the above method are implemented.

[0008] Compared with the prior art, the embodiments of the present application have the following beneficial effects: calculating the total cost of the set calculation required to complete the target project and the cost of the set calculation of various objects; obtaining the current bid price of various objects given by the target party undertaking the target project and the current total bid price of the target project and the total price of the previous round of bids; calculating the price deviation rate of various objects according to the set calculation costs of various objects and the current bid price; calculating the total price deviation rate according to the total cost of the set calculation and the current total bid price; calculating the bid change rate according to the current total bid price and the total bid price of the previous round; determining the bid price evaluation score of the target party based on the total price deviation rate, the bid change rate and the price deviation rate of various objects. The above technical means can solve the problems of the single evaluation angle of the rationality of the bid price in the prior art and the inability to guarantee the accuracy of the analysis results, and then evaluate the rationality of the bid price in multiple dimensions to ensure the accuracy of the analysis results. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0009] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative work.

[0010] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of a method for evaluating the rationality of a bid return price provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0011] Figure 2 It is a flowchart of another method for evaluating the rationality of a bid return price provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0012] Figure 3 It is a structural schematic diagram of a bid price rationality evaluation device provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0013] Figure 4 It is a structural schematic diagram of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0014] In the following description, specific details such as specific system structures, technologies, etc. are provided for the purpose of illustration rather than limitation, so as to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments of the present application. However, it should be clear to those skilled in the art that the present application may also be implemented in other embodiments without these specific details. In other cases, detailed descriptions of well-known systems, devices, circuits, and methods are omitted to prevent unnecessary details from obstructing the description of the present application.

[0015] A method and device for evaluating the rationality of a return bid price according to an embodiment of the present application will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0016] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of a method for evaluating the rationality of a bid return price provided in an embodiment of the present application. Figure 1 The method for evaluating the reasonableness of the bid price can be executed by a computer or a server, or by software on the computer or the server. Figure 1 As shown in the figure, the method for evaluating the reasonableness of the bid price includes:

[0017] S101, calculating the total cost of the target project and the cost of various objects;

[0018] S102, obtaining the current bid prices of various objects given by the target party undertaking the target project, as well as the current total bid price of the target project and the total bid price of the previous round;

[0019] S103, calculating the price deviation rate of various objects according to the calculation costs of various objects and the current bid price;

[0020] S104, calculating the total price deviation rate according to the total cost of the calculation and the current total bid price;

[0021] S105, calculating the return bid change rate according to the current total return bid price and the total return bid price of the previous round;

[0022] S106, determining the target party's return bid price evaluation score based on the total price deviation rate and the return bid change rate as well as the price deviation rates of various objects.

[0023] Taking the target project as a construction project as an example, the various objects required to complete the target project include: various material costs, labor costs, various mechanical equipment costs, etc. The materials that are more needed in the construction project are steel bars, concrete, blocks, etc. The calculated costs of various objects are the various material costs, labor costs, various mechanical equipment costs, loss costs, etc. estimated by the user who established the target project. The total calculated cost is the total cost required to complete the target project estimated by the user. Generally, the total calculated cost is equal to the sum of the calculated costs of various objects. The target party who undertakes the target project is the contractor. The current total bid price is the total contract price required for the target project given by the target party. The current bid price of various objects is the contract price required by various objects. Generally, the current total bid price is equal to the sum of the current bid prices of various objects. Because in general, multiple rounds of price negotiations are required between users and contractors, the total bid price of the previous round of the current round can also be obtained, which is recorded as the total bid price of the previous round. If the current round is the first round, then the total bid price of the previous round is equal to the current total bid price by default, and the bid change rate is zero.

[0024] For an object, the percentage between the calculated cost of the object and the current bid price is calculated as the price deviation rate of the object. The percentage between the calculated total cost and the current bid total price is calculated as the total price deviation rate. The percentage between the current bid total price and the previous bid total price is calculated as the bid change rate. Finally, the total price deviation rate, the bid change rate and the price deviation rate of various objects are combined to determine the bid price evaluation score of the target party. The bid price evaluation score is determined from three dimensions. The price deviation rate of various objects is to evaluate the rationality of the bid price from the dimension of the cost of the specific object required to complete the target project; the total price deviation rate is to evaluate the rationality of the bid price from the dimension of the total cost of the target project; the bid change rate is to evaluate the rationality of the bid price from the dimension of the contractor's service attitude. It is generally believed that the greater the reduction of the current bid total price compared with the previous bid total price, the better the contractor's service attitude. By comparing the bid price evaluation score with the preset multiple scores, the evaluation result of the rationality of the bid price can be obtained.

[0025] According to the technical solution provided in the embodiment of the present application, the total cost of the calculation required to complete the target project and the cost of the calculation of various objects are calculated; the current return bid prices of various objects given by the target party undertaking the target project and the current total return bid price of the target project and the total price of the previous round of return bids are obtained; the price deviation rate of various objects is calculated based on the calculation costs of various objects and the current return bid price; the total price deviation rate is calculated based on the total cost of the calculation and the current total return bid price; the return bid change rate is calculated based on the current total return bid price and the total return bid price of the previous round; the return bid price evaluation score of the target party is determined based on the total price deviation rate, the return bid change rate and the price deviation rate of various objects. The above technical means can be used to solve the problems of the single evaluation angle of the rationality of the return bid price in the prior art and the inability to guarantee the accuracy of the analysis results, and then the rationality of the return bid price is evaluated in multiple dimensions to ensure the accuracy of the analysis results.

[0026] Furthermore, the total cost of the proposed method and the proposed costs of various objects required to complete the target project are calculated, including: obtaining project information of the target project, wherein the project information includes the quantity of various objects required to complete the target project; obtaining the market unit prices of various objects, and calculating the proposed costs of various objects based on the quantity and market unit prices of various objects; and calculating the total cost of the proposed method based on the proposed costs of various objects.

[0027] The product of the quantity of various objects and the market unit price is taken as the calculated cost of the object, and the sum of the calculated costs of various objects is taken as the total calculated cost. The quantity of various objects is estimated based on the engineering volume of the target project and historical experience, and the market unit price of various objects will also change in real time, so the total calculated cost and the calculated costs of various objects are only estimated by the target party.

[0028] Furthermore, the target party's return bid price evaluation score is determined based on the total price deviation rate and the return bid change rate as well as the price deviation rates of various objects, including: determining the total price evaluation score, the return bid attitude evaluation score and the individual price evaluation score based on the total price deviation rate and the return bid change rate as well as the price deviation rates of various objects respectively; weightedly summing the total price evaluation score, the return bid attitude evaluation score and the individual price evaluation score according to a first preset weight to obtain the return bid price evaluation score.

[0029] Different total price deviation rates correspond to different total price evaluation scores, different bid return change rates correspond to different bid return attitude evaluation scores, and different price deviation rates of various objects correspond to different single price evaluation scores. The total price evaluation score is determined based on the total price deviation rate, the bid return attitude evaluation score is determined based on the bid return change rate, and the single price evaluation score is determined based on the price deviation rate of various objects. Finally, the total price evaluation score, the bid return attitude evaluation score, and the single price evaluation score are weighted and summed according to the first preset weight to obtain the bid return price evaluation score.

[0030] Furthermore, determining a single price evaluation score based on the price deviation rates of various objects includes: calculating a weighted average deviation rate of the price deviation rates of various objects according to a second preset weight; and determining a single price evaluation score based on the weighted average deviation rate.

[0031] In order to integrate the price deviation rates of various objects together, the weighted average deviation rate of the price deviation rates of various objects can be calculated, and finally the single price evaluation score can be determined based on the weighted average deviation rate. It should be noted that the weights of various objects in the second preset weight are related to the quantity, unit price, unit price change rate in different periods, and the role of various objects in the target project. The greater the weight of the object that plays the most basic role in the target project, such as the quality of steel bars directly affects the quality of the target project, and the weight of steel bars in the second preset weight is the largest. The unit price change rate in different periods describes the rate of change of the unit price of objects in different periods. It can be the percentage of the difference in the unit price of objects in two periods. The greater the unit price change rate in different periods, the greater the weight of the object. For example, the labor cost changes a lot in different periods, so the weight of the labor cost in the second preset weight is the largest.

[0032] Furthermore, before determining the target party's return bid price evaluation score based on the total price deviation rate and the return bid change rate as well as the price deviation rates of various objects, the method also includes: obtaining the preliminary total cost of the calculation required to complete the target project and the preliminary cost of the calculation of various objects; calculating a first calculation ratio based on the preliminary total cost of the calculation and the total cost of the calculation; calculating a second calculation ratio for various objects based on the preliminary cost of the calculation and the calculation cost of various objects; correcting the total price deviation rate based on the first calculation ratio; and correcting the price deviation rate of various objects based on the second calculation ratio of various objects.

[0033] The total preliminary cost of the package and the preliminary cost of the package of various objects are obtained by the first estimation, which is generally obtained before the target project is established. The total cost of the package and the package costs of various objects are estimated when the user and the target party conduct the current round of price negotiation, that is, before the target party gives the current bid price of various objects and the current bid total price of the target project. The percentage of the total preliminary cost of the package and the total cost of the package is taken as the first package ratio. The percentage of the preliminary cost of the package and the package cost of various objects is taken as the second package ratio of the object. The total price deviation rate is corrected according to the difference between the first package ratio and the preset package ratio. For example, if the first package ratio is greater than the first preset package ratio, the total price deviation rate is increased according to the difference between the first package ratio and the first preset package ratio. The price deviation rate of various objects is corrected according to the second package ratio of various objects. For example, if the second package ratio is greater than the first preset package ratio, the price deviation rate is increased according to the difference between the second package ratio and the first preset package ratio.

[0034] Figure 2is a flow chart of another method for evaluating the rationality of a bid price provided in an embodiment of the present application. Figure 2 As shown:

[0035] S201, obtaining project information of a target project and project information of multiple historical projects;

[0036] S202, determining a reference project that is most similar to the target project from multiple historical projects based on the project information of the target project and the project information of each historical project;

[0037] S203, obtaining the total price of historical winning bids for the reference project, and calculating the reference total cost based on the total price of historical winning bids, the project information of the target project, and the project information of the reference project;

[0038] S204, calculating the reference price deviation rate according to the reference total cost and the current total bid price;

[0039] S205, determining the target party's return bid price evaluation score based on the reference price deviation rate, the total price deviation rate and the return bid change rate as well as the price deviation rates of various objects.

[0040] The project information of the target project and the project information of multiple historical projects both include: the location and area of ​​the project implementation, the number of various objects required to complete the project, etc. Based on the similarity between the project information of the target project and the project information of each historical project, the historical project with the greatest similarity to the target project is used as the reference project. The total price of the historical winning bid can be multiplied by the ratio of the area of ​​the target project and the reference project to obtain the reference total cost. The percentage of the reference total cost and the current total price of the bid, or the percentage of the difference, is used as the reference price deviation rate.

[0041] Furthermore, the target party's return bid price evaluation score is determined based on the reference price deviation rate, the total price deviation rate and the return bid change rate as well as the price deviation rates of various objects, including: determining the reference price evaluation score, the total price evaluation score, the return bid attitude evaluation score and the individual price evaluation score based on the reference price deviation rate, the total price deviation rate and the return bid change rate as well as the price deviation rates of various objects respectively; taking the weighted sum of the reference price evaluation score, the total price evaluation score, the return bid attitude evaluation score and the individual price evaluation score according to a third preset weight to obtain the return bid price evaluation score.

[0042] All the above optional technical solutions can be arbitrarily combined to form optional embodiments of the present application, which will not be described one by one here.

[0043] The following is an embodiment of the device of the present application, which can be used to execute the embodiment of the method of the present application. For details not disclosed in the embodiment of the device of the present application, please refer to the embodiment of the method of the present application.

[0044] Figure 3 Schematic diagram of a bid price rationality evaluation device provided in an embodiment of the present application. Figure 3 As shown, the bid price rationality evaluation device includes:

[0045] The first calculation module 301 is configured to calculate the total cost of the set calculation required to complete the target project and the set calculation costs of various objects;

[0046] The acquisition module 302 is configured to acquire the current bid prices of various objects given by the target party undertaking the target project, as well as the current total bid price of the target project and the total bid price of the previous round;

[0047] The second calculation module 303 is configured to calculate the price deviation rate of various objects according to the calculation fee of various objects and the current bid price;

[0048] The third calculation module 304 is configured to calculate the total price deviation rate according to the total cost of the package and the current total bid price;

[0049] The fourth calculation module 305 is configured to calculate the return bid change rate according to the current return bid total price and the previous round return bid total price;

[0050] The determination module 306 is configured to determine the target party's return bid price evaluation score based on the total price deviation rate and the return bid change rate as well as the price deviation rates of various objects.

[0051] According to the technical solution provided in the embodiment of the present application, the total cost of the calculation required to complete the target project and the cost of the calculation of various objects are calculated; the current return bid prices of various objects given by the target party undertaking the target project and the current total return bid price of the target project and the total price of the previous round of return bids are obtained; the price deviation rate of various objects is calculated based on the calculation costs of various objects and the current return bid price; the total price deviation rate is calculated based on the total cost of the calculation and the current total return bid price; the return bid change rate is calculated based on the current total return bid price and the total return bid price of the previous round; the return bid price evaluation score of the target party is determined based on the total price deviation rate, the return bid change rate and the price deviation rate of various objects. The above technical means can be used to solve the problems of the single evaluation angle of the rationality of the return bid price in the prior art and the inability to guarantee the accuracy of the analysis results, and then the rationality of the return bid price is evaluated in multiple dimensions to ensure the accuracy of the analysis results.

[0052] In some embodiments, the first calculation module 301 is also configured to obtain project information of the target project, wherein the project information includes the quantity of various objects required to complete the target project; obtain the market unit price of various objects, and calculate the set cost of various objects based on the quantity and market unit price of various objects; and calculate the total set cost based on the set cost of various objects.

[0053] The product of the quantity of various objects and the market unit price is taken as the calculated cost of the object, and the sum of the calculated costs of various objects is taken as the total calculated cost. The quantity of various objects is estimated based on the engineering volume of the target project and historical experience, and the market unit price of various objects will also change in real time, so the total calculated cost and the calculated costs of various objects are only estimated by the target party.

[0054] In some embodiments, the determination module 306 is also configured to determine the total price evaluation score, the return bid attitude evaluation score and the single price evaluation score based on the total price deviation rate and the return bid change rate and the price deviation rate of various objects respectively; and weightedly sum the total price evaluation score, the return bid attitude evaluation score and the single price evaluation score according to the first preset weight to obtain the return bid price evaluation score.

[0055] Different total price deviation rates correspond to different total price evaluation scores, different bid return change rates correspond to different bid return attitude evaluation scores, and different price deviation rates of various objects correspond to different single price evaluation scores. The total price evaluation score is determined based on the total price deviation rate, the bid return attitude evaluation score is determined based on the bid return change rate, and the single price evaluation score is determined based on the price deviation rate of various objects. Finally, the total price evaluation score, the bid return attitude evaluation score, and the single price evaluation score are weighted and summed according to the first preset weight to obtain the bid return price evaluation score.

[0056] In some embodiments, the determination module 306 is further configured to calculate a weighted average deviation rate of price deviation rates of various objects according to a second preset weight; and determine a single price evaluation score based on the weighted average deviation rate.

[0057] In order to integrate the price deviation rates of various objects together, the weighted average deviation rate of the price deviation rates of various objects can be calculated, and finally the single price evaluation score can be determined based on the weighted average deviation rate. It should be noted that the weights of various objects in the second preset weight are related to the quantity, unit price, unit price change rate in different periods, and the role of various objects in the target project. The greater the weight of the object that plays the most basic role in the target project, such as the quality of steel bars directly affects the quality of the target project, and the weight of steel bars in the second preset weight is the largest. The unit price change rate in different periods describes the rate of change of the unit price of objects in different periods. It can be the percentage of the difference in the unit price of objects in two periods. The greater the unit price change rate in different periods, the greater the weight of the object. For example, the labor cost changes a lot in different periods, so the weight of the labor cost in the second preset weight is the largest.

[0058] In some embodiments, the third calculation module 304 is also configured to obtain the preliminary total cost required to complete the target project and the preliminary cost of various objects; calculate the first calculation ratio based on the preliminary total cost and the total cost; calculate the second calculation ratio of various objects based on the preliminary cost and the cost of various objects; correct the total price deviation rate based on the first calculation ratio; correct the price deviation rate of various objects based on the second calculation ratio of various objects.

[0059] The total preliminary cost of the package and the preliminary cost of the package of various objects are obtained by the first estimation, which is generally obtained before the target project is established. The total cost of the package and the package costs of various objects are estimated when the user and the target party conduct the current round of price negotiation, that is, before the target party gives the current bid price of various objects and the current bid total price of the target project. The percentage of the total preliminary cost of the package and the total cost of the package is taken as the first package ratio. The percentage of the preliminary cost of the package and the package cost of various objects is taken as the second package ratio of the object. The total price deviation rate is corrected according to the difference between the first package ratio and the preset package ratio. For example, if the first package ratio is greater than the first preset package ratio, the total price deviation rate is increased according to the difference between the first package ratio and the first preset package ratio. The price deviation rate of various objects is corrected according to the second package ratio of various objects. For example, if the second package ratio is greater than the first preset package ratio, the price deviation rate is increased according to the difference between the second package ratio and the first preset package ratio.

[0060] In some embodiments, the determination module 306 is also configured to obtain project information of the target project and project information of multiple historical projects; based on the project information of the target project and the project information of each historical project, determine a reference project that is most similar to the target project from multiple historical projects; obtain the historical total winning bid prices of the reference projects, and calculate the reference total cost based on the historical total winning bid prices, the project information of the target project, and the project information of the reference projects; calculate the reference price deviation rate based on the reference total cost and the current return bid total price; determine the target party's return bid price evaluation score based on the reference price deviation rate, the total price deviation rate, the return bid change rate, and the price deviation rates of various objects.

[0061] The project information of the target project and the project information of multiple historical projects both include: the location and area of ​​the project implementation, the number of various objects required to complete the project, etc. Based on the similarity between the project information of the target project and the project information of each historical project, the historical project with the greatest similarity to the target project is used as the reference project. The total price of the historical winning bid can be multiplied by the ratio of the area of ​​the target project and the reference project to obtain the reference total cost. The percentage of the reference total cost and the current total price of the bid, or the percentage of the difference, is used as the reference price deviation rate.

[0062] In some embodiments, the determination module 306 is also configured to determine the reference price evaluation score, the total price evaluation score, the return bid attitude evaluation score and the single price evaluation score based on the reference price deviation rate, the total price deviation rate and the return bid change rate, as well as the price deviation rate of various objects, respectively; and to weight and sum the reference price evaluation score, the total price evaluation score, the return bid attitude evaluation score and the single price evaluation score according to a third preset weight to obtain the return bid price evaluation score.

[0063] It should be understood that the size of the serial numbers of the steps in the above embodiments does not mean the order of execution. The execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of the present application.

[0064] Figure 4 Schematic diagram of an electronic device 4 provided in an embodiment of the present application. Figure 4 As shown, the electronic device 4 of this embodiment includes: a processor 401, a memory 402, and a computer program 403 stored in the memory 402 and executable on the processor 401. When the processor 401 executes the computer program 403, the steps in the above-mentioned method embodiments are implemented. Alternatively, when the processor 401 executes the computer program 403, the functions of the modules / units in the above-mentioned device embodiments are implemented.

[0065] The electronic device 4 may be a desktop computer, a notebook, a PDA, a cloud server, or other electronic device. The electronic device 4 may include, but is not limited to, a processor 401 and a memory 402. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that Figure 4 The electronic device 4 is merely an example and does not limit the electronic device 4 , and may include more or less components than those shown in the figure, or different components.

[0066] The processor 401 may be a central processing unit (CPU), or other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSP), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc.

[0067] The memory 402 may be an internal storage unit of the electronic device 4, for example, a hard disk or memory of the electronic device 4. The memory 402 may also be an external storage device of the electronic device 4, for example, a plug-in hard disk, a smart media card (SMC), a secure digital (SD) card, a flash card, etc. equipped on the electronic device 4. The memory 402 may also include both an internal storage unit and an external storage device of the electronic device 4. The memory 402 is used to store computer programs and other programs and data required by the electronic device.

[0068] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that for the convenience and simplicity of description, only the division of the above-mentioned functional units and modules is used as an example. In actual applications, the above-mentioned functions can be assigned to different functional units and modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the device can be divided into different functional units or modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. The functional units and modules in the embodiments can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit. The above-mentioned integrated unit can be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional units.

[0069] If the integrated module / unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the present application implements all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment method, and can also be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program. The computer program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and the computer program can implement the steps of the above-mentioned various method embodiments when executed by the processor. The computer program may include computer program code, and the computer program code may be in source code form, object code form, executable file or some intermediate form. The computer-readable medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying computer program code, recording medium, U disk, mobile hard disk, magnetic disk, optical disk, computer memory, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), electric carrier signal, telecommunication signal and software distribution medium. It should be noted that the content contained in the computer-readable medium can be appropriately increased or decreased according to the requirements of legislation and patent practice in the jurisdiction. For example, in some jurisdictions, according to legislation and patent practice, the computer-readable medium does not include electric carrier signals and telecommunication signals.

[0070] The above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present application, rather than to limit them. Although the present application has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or make equivalent replacements for some of the technical features therein. These modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, and should all be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the rationality of a bid price, characterized in that: include: Calculate the total cost of the project and the cost of each object required to complete the target project; Obtain the current bid prices of various objects given by the target party undertaking the target project, as well as the current total bid price of the target project and the total bid price of the previous round; Calculate the price deviation rate of various objects based on the calculation costs of various objects and the current bid price; Calculate the total price deviation rate based on the total calculated cost and the current total bid price; Calculate the return bid change rate based on the current return bid total price and the previous round return bid total price; The target party's return bid price evaluation score is determined based on the total price deviation rate, the return bid change rate, and the price deviation rates of various objects.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Calculate the total cost of completing the target project and the cost of various objects, including: Acquire project information of the target project, wherein the project information includes the quantity of various objects required to complete the target project; Obtain the market unit price of various objects, and calculate the set cost of various objects according to the quantity and market unit price of various objects; The total set fee is calculated based on the set fees of various objects.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Determining the target party's bid price evaluation score based on the total price deviation rate, the bid return change rate, and the price deviation rates of various objects includes: Determine the total price evaluation score, the return bid attitude evaluation score and the single item price evaluation score based on the total price deviation rate, the return bid change rate and the price deviation rates of various objects respectively; The total price evaluation score, the return bid attitude evaluation score and the single price evaluation score are weighted and summed according to a first preset weight to obtain the return bid price evaluation score.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that The individual price assessment scores are determined based on the price deviation rates of various objects, including: Calculate the weighted average deviation rate of the price deviation rates of various objects according to the second preset weight; The individual price evaluation scores are determined based on the weighted average deviation rate.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Before determining the target party's return bid price evaluation score based on the total price deviation rate, the return bid change rate, and the price deviation rates of various objects, the method further includes: Obtain the total preliminary cost of the project and the preliminary cost of each object required to complete the target project; Calculate a first calculation ratio based on the preliminary total cost of the calculation and the total cost of the calculation; Calculate the second cost-calculation ratio of various objects based on the preliminary cost-calculation and cost-calculation of various objects; Correcting the total price deviation rate according to the first set of calculation ratios; The price deviation rate of various objects is corrected based on the second set of calculation ratios for various objects.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that After calculating the return bid change rate according to the current return bid total price and the previous round return bid total price, the method further includes: Acquire project information of the target project and project information of multiple historical projects; Based on the project information of the target project and the project information of each historical project, determining a reference project that is most similar to the target project from a plurality of historical projects; Obtaining the total price of historical winning bids for the reference project, and calculating a reference total cost based on the total price of historical winning bids, the project information of the target project, and the project information of the reference project; Calculate the reference price deviation rate based on the reference total cost and the current total bid price; The target party's return bid price evaluation score is determined based on the reference price deviation rate, the total price deviation rate, the return bid change rate, and the price deviation rates of various objects.

7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that Determining the target party's bid price evaluation score based on the reference price deviation rate, the total price deviation rate, the bid return change rate, and the price deviation rates of various objects includes: Determine a reference price evaluation score, a total price evaluation score, a return bid attitude evaluation score and a single price evaluation score based on the reference price deviation rate, the total price deviation rate and the return bid change rate as well as the price deviation rates of various objects respectively; The reference price evaluation score, the total price evaluation score, the return bid attitude evaluation score and the single price evaluation score are weighted and summed according to a third preset weight to obtain the return bid price evaluation score.

8. A device for evaluating the rationality of a bid price, characterized in that: include: A first calculation module is configured to calculate the total cost of the set calculation required to complete the target project and the cost of the set calculation of various objects; An acquisition module is configured to acquire current bid prices of various objects given by the target party undertaking the target project, as well as the current total bid price of the target project and the total bid price of the previous round; The second calculation module is configured to calculate the price deviation rate of various objects according to the calculation fee of various objects and the current bid price; A third calculation module is configured to calculate a total price deviation rate according to the total calculated cost and the current total bid price; A fourth calculation module is configured to calculate a return bid change rate according to the current return bid total price and the previous round return bid total price; The determination module is configured to determine the target party's return bid price evaluation score based on the total price deviation rate, the return bid change rate, and the price deviation rates of various objects.

9. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that: When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

10. A computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

Images